This site aims to break the silence on the economic crimes committed with magistrates' power which violate their Oath to observe the Constitution and with the power of lawyers which deceive privileges which bind them to the Courts.

Last update : Wednesday, November 14 th, 2018 RETURN


Principal Theme:


The new federal lock which allows banks and lawyers to use screen-lawyers to commit crimes with complete impunity in Switzerland and abroad with the protection of the federal Court.
 
     
Today Theme: Respect of article 30 of the Constitution by Swiss Authorities.
In Switzerland, the relations which bind the brotherhoods of lawyers to the Courts prevent the investigation of crimes committed with screen-lawyers. The victims of these crimes have no access to neutral and independent Courts. There is violation of the article 30 of the Swiss supreme law.
The Swiss politicians are here invited to end this violation of the Swiss Constitution.
 
     
1st Result The Swiss Justice is infiltrated by a criminal organization named: "le Réseau OAV". The Kamikazes of Daech use the same modus operandi which is used by this occult organisation to impose their law and impose a climate of terror with the power of their State "Damage caused with secret procedures from which we cannot protect ourselves  

HISTORY FILE:

DATE ACTION COMMENT LINK
       
14.11.18 101 INSPECTORS OF THE JUDICIAL POLICE REFUSE TO OBEY TO A MINISTER OF JUSTICE WHO USES A STRATEGY OF LYING AND MANIPULATING... AND WHO IS THEIR CHIEF!

Magnificent lesson of ethics of a Force of police inspectors from the criminal investigation, who made the Oath to respect the federal Constitution and the fundamental rights of the citizens. To honour this Serment they refuse to obey to a Chief who uses a strategy of lying and manipulating which is not compatible with confidence and respect of the Values of the Constitution.

See TV News of 18H30 from November 3 rd, 2018

Inspecteurs de police judiciaire refusant la corruption
Pierre MAUDET
Minister of Justice
of Geneva State,
who betrayer his Oath to respect the federal Constitution

The labour union of Police reminds that their first duty is to enforce the Constitution. Their role is not to work for MINISTER OF JUSTICE WHO DOES NOT SHARE THESE VALUES, but who uses the strategy of lying and of manipulating.

.

ONE THANK YOU TO THE POLICE FORCE OF THE JUDICIAL INSPECTORS OF THE STATE OF GENEVA TO REMIND THAT THE ROLE OF A MINISTER OF JUSTICE IS TO ENFORCE THE VALUES OF OUR CONSTITUTION!

THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE of the State of Geneva forgot that we are sovereign people.

He forgot that the leading role of a Minister and a Magistrate is to apply and to enforce the Values of our Constitution.

He forgot that every police inspector from the criminal investigation made the Oath to respect the Values of the federal Constitution.

He forgot that his role of Minister of Justice is to be the servant of all the citizens who elected him to enforce the Values of their Constitution.

 

Of the historic importance of the decision of 101 inspectors of the Criminal Investigation Department to refuse to obey to a magistrate, Minister of Justice, who uses a the strategy of lying and manipulating :

In 1918, Switzerland was on the brink of a civil war further to that the Authorities did not want to enforce the fundamental rights of the weakest citizens guaranteed by the Constitution.

At that time, there was no deceit made by senior magistrates. It was a balance of power. The Committee of Olten found the necessary strength with the organization of the general strike of Olten to enforce the Values of the Constitution.

Today, if we look at the behaviour of Pierre MAUDET, nothing has changed, except that the senior magistrates use now the strategy of lying and manipulating to violate the Values of our Constitution.

The decision of the judicial Force of police inspectors of Geneva, to refuse to obey to a Minister of Justice who lies, is as important as the General Strike organized by the Committee of OLTEN to enforce the Values of our Constitution.

This lesson of ethics of the judicial Force of Police should incite our SWISS MINISTER OF JUSTICE, Simonetta Sommaruga, to make condemn in an exemplary way the senior magistrates and the elected representatives who are using a "Fake LAW" to assure  the impunity of members of corrupt elites, who as Pierre Maudet, have too much power.

An official request has been sent to Simonetta Sommaruga to enforce the federal Constitution and to take example on the actions made by the Commitee of Olten or the writer "Lukas Hartmann" to protect the fundamental rights of the weakest citizens, see :

181114DE_SS

Ethic Lesson

181114DE_SS

181030DE_VP

181020DE_ML

 

 

07.11.18 DO YOU KNOW: WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A SWISS LAWYER AND A PAKISTANI LAWYER WHO MUST DEFEND THE RESPECT OF THE HUMAN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN FRONT OF THE AUTHORITIES?

In both cases the fundamental rights of their customers are violated. In Switzerland, the customer is deprived of the human right to be defended by his lawyer, while in Pakistan the lawyer defending the customer has to flee the country to save his life.

Me SAIF UL MULOOK
Me SAIF UL MULOOK
Lawyer of ASIA BIBI
In Pakistan

This lawyer is not deprived of the right to defend his customer by the Authorities although they do not want to respect human rights!

But he had to flee in Holland for his safety and to mobilize the International opinion, see part :

181106DE_RJ

ASIABIBI

 

THE SIMPLE INVENTED SOLUTION BY THE SWISS GOVERNMENT TO OBTAIN A GOOD SCORE WITH TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL: THEY HAVE JUST TO DEPRIVE A CITIZEN OF THE RESPECT OF HIS HUMAN RIGHTS TO BE DEFENDED BY HIS LAWYER, SO THAT THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF THIS CITIZEN IS NOT VISIBLE ANYMORE!

Of each to appreciate that on an ethical point of view, the federal Council uses a process of traitor and that the score published by Transparency International has no Value !

Presentation below of the process of traitor, used in Switzerland by ruling elites to violate the human rights, which knows well Alain Berset, President of the Confederacy.
Of each to assess it from an ethical point of view:

In Pakistan :
Lawyers can defend their customer and prove the violation of human rights. Their work is of no use. Their customers have their fundamental rights infringed further to that the Islamist elites, who manage the country, do not respect human rights.
Lawyers have to flee the country for their safety, further to the violation of the fundamental rights of their customers by the Authorities. Abroad, they can nevertheless mobilize the international opinion.

See case ASIABIBI

The transparency on the respect of the rights of the lawyers to defend their customers by the authorities gives a bad score with Transparency International for the respect of the Human rights of the lawyer customers by the Authorities

 

In Switzerland :
Lawyers are deprived of the right to defend their customer by the Authorities to prove the violation of human rights. Their customers have their fundamental rights infringed, as in Pakistan, following what ruling elites at the head of the country do not respect human rights.
Lawyers censored by the Authorities cannot mobilized the international opinion. They do not need to flee from their country for their safety as they are censored and cannot reveal the violation of the fundamental rights of their customers.

See case BETTEX

The absence of transparency, on the violation of the rights of the lawyers to defend the fundamental rights of their customers by the ruling elites, gives a wrongly good score with Transparency International for the Human rights respect by the Authorities due to the censorhip of the lawyer.

On an ethical point of view, we can hope that in Switzerland, elected representatives who are different of the ruling elites, alerted by the existence of this process of traitor used by ruling elites to hide the violation of human rights, are going to end it!

181106DE_RJ

181106DE_RJ

ASIABIBI

31.10.18 BEAUTIFUL LESSON OF ETHICS OF the PRESIDENT OF THE MEDICAL SOCIETY OF FRENCH-SPEAKING SWITZERLAND GIVEN TO ALAIN BERSET, PRESIDENT OF THE CONFEDERACY

It is not because we are a high magistrate that we can violate the rules of the good faith with a report containing misleading figures

Dr_Philippe_Eggimann
Dr Philippe Eggimann
President of the Medical Society
of french-speaking Switzerland

Dr Eggimann has the opportunity that his RIGHT to be heard couldn’t be violated by high magistrates with a misleading report. He gives a beautiful lesson of ethics to Alain Berset who is also valid for the misleading report made by Me Claude Rouiller

Dr EGGIMANN HAS THE OPPORTUNITY THAT HIS RIGHT TO BE HEARD COULD’NT BE VIOLATED BY A VERY HIGH MAGISTRATE WHO USES STUDIES WITH MISLEADING FIGURES TO MISLEAD THE CITIZENS ON THE REALITY OF THE FACTS

He shows that the silence of the President of the Confederacy on the deliberately vitiated report of Claude ROUILLER would not be acceptable for the members of the society of medicine.

For the members of the SVM, the high magistrates do not have the right to resort to studies containing misleading figures to cover dysfunctions of the Authorities.

The President of the Confederacy is made aware that a lawyer has just explained that the condition imposed by the Bar association to block the legal action is not a LAW, but an outlaw way used by the members of brotherhoods to obtain the prescription on their crimes.


In view of this new fact and of the lesson of ethics of Dr Eggimann, it is requested from Alain BERSET, President of the Confederacy, that he enforces the federal Constitutione

The criminal complaint filed against the Bar association, further to this LAW which does not exist, is sent to him for action.

181031DE_AB

181020DE_ML

It has been also requested from Dominique de BUMAN, President of the Parliament, to enforce the federal Constitution with the file of this criminal complaint delivered personally by hand to him

181025DE_DB

181031DE_AB

181025DE_DB

181020DE_ML

24.10.18 The SILENCE OF THE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES, ON THE CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE PRESIDENTS OF THE BAR TO the COURTS TO HINDER THE LEGAL ACTION, IS BROKEN BY A LAWYER :

The conditions imposed by the Presidents of the bar are not a LAW. It is the reason why we cannot find them in the codes of procedures.

This lawyer explains that the crimes, committed with these conditions imposed by the Bar association to the Courts, are imprescriptible!

A criminal complaint was filed against the Bar association further to the interventions of the Presidents of the bar, Philippe Richard, Yves BURNAND, Christian BETTEX, Claude ROUILLER, Philippe BAUER, etc.

Me Christian BETTEX
Me Christian BETTEX
Former President of the Bar
State Lawyer
Parliament Lawyer

The former President of the bar, Christian BETTEX, had explained that the conditions imposed by the Bar association to hinder the President of the Court, Bertrand SAUTEREL, of questioning a key witness, have allowed the members of the bar association to violate the constitutional fundamental rights

He omitted to say that these conditions imposed by himself were not a LAW and that the crimes committed with these conditions imposed to the Courts are imprescriptible !

THE BAR ASSOCIATION ENFORCES THE FEDERAL COURT TO APPLY A LAW WHICH DOES NOT EXIST, IN ORDER THAT THE MEMBERS OF THEIR BAR ASSOCIATION OBTAIN THE PRESCRIPTION WITH COMPLETE IMPUNITY FOR THEIR CRIMES

A lawyer questioned about the limitation periods for the conditions imposed by the Presidents of the bar to block the legal action against their members, as the authorization request of the President of the bar to lodge a complaint against their members, completes the explanations of Me of ROUGEMONT.
He asserts that :

« The authorization request to be obtained from the President of the bar to be able to lodge a penal complaint against a PDG who violates the copyright, if he is a member of the bar association, does not exist in the LAW »

After having acquainted with the request of parliamentary inquiry which gives evidence of its existence, he observes that it is a way outside the LAW used by the members of bar association to obtain the prescription !

See content of the request of parliamentary inquiry, top of page 3: 051217DP_GC

In the case described by the request of parliamentary inquiry, he confirms that there is violation of the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution.

He specifies that the notion of limitation period has no sense, because the codes of procedures do not allow to manage the cases.

It is an imprescriptible case : the Bar association cannot hinder the legal action with conditions imposed to the Courts to obtain the prescription and then to take advantage of the prescription in this given context !

If these conditions imposed by the Bar association are not in the codes of procedures available for  the public, it is simply because they do not exist in LAW !

The silence of the elected representatives of our people on the violation of the fundamental rights, with these conditions imposed by the Bar association, takes a new dimension which reminds the Carpostal case.

We remind that for the case of Carpostal, national Councillors wanted that there is no prescription.

This time, it is even a lawyer who observes that it is an imprescriptible case, which shows the existence of a corrupt elite.

He explained that the Bar association, with its conditions imposed to the Courts to hinder legal action, violates the article 5 of the federal Constitution.

"Article 5 : the LAW is the base and the limit of the activity of the State"

A criminal complaint was filed against the bar association and the magistrates implicated in this case with the requirement of the access to neutral and independent Courts of the bar association.

181020DE_ML

051217DP_GC

181020DE_ML

181010DE_PM

181016DE_NG

 

17.10.18 A LAWYER STAND IN FOR A WITNESS TO COVER ORGANIZED CRIME BY USING THE RELATIONS BINDING THE COURTS TO THE BAR ASSOCIATION

Comments made by Me de ROUGEMONT, appointed by the vaudois Parliament, for the case presented here :

"THE COURTS ARE NOT COMPETENT TO HANDLE THIS CASE, BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT INDEPENDENT OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION"

WHO IS COMPETENT TO ENFORCE THE GUARANTEED FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION HERE ?

Nuria GORRITE
Nuria GORRITE
President of the State Council
of Vaud

She has certainly the power to do it or to find solutions!

The principle of separation of power applied correctly gives the competence to the other powers that the one of the justice to take corrective actions to assure the respect of the Values of the Constitution

SIX JUDGES REVEAL HOW THE CODES OF PROCEDURES ALLOW A LAWYER TO MAKE THEM INTRODUCE INTO A JUDGMENT A PERJURY OF A WITNESS WHO HAS NEVER EXISTED :

Transparency is finally given on this unfailing method

They have invented the simple solution!

Disclosure of the method in two points:

Point 1 : During his last intervention in an audience of witnesses, the defence counsel explains to the President of the Court what a (fictitious) witness should have said, for example: (yadda… yadda)

Point 2 : The President of the Court notes then in his judgment with the standard formula : a witness, (for whom the judge has omitted the name in the judgment), said:  (yadda … yadda)

It's already over : It appears in the judgment witnesses audition report, the testimony (yadda … yadda) of a witness who has never existed and for whom the name is not quoted !

Explanations of a lawyer on the infallibility of this method:

Point A : The code of procedure does not allow the complainant counsel to dispute the registration of the testimony (yadda … yadda) by the President of the Court in its judgment

Point B :If the complainant counsel disputes this testimony by a mail (of clarification) sent to the President, the code of procedure allows the President to return him this mail so that the mail does not appear in the Court file.

Point C: If the complainant counsel wants to call upon this mail (of clarification) in a trial, the code of procedure does not allow him to do it.

Demonstration made by the lawyer Diego-Bischof with as President of the Court: Sir de Montmollin

In the case presented here, Diego Bischof shows how this method allowed him to introduce in the judgment the testimony of a (fictitious) witness who said that a CD containing a digital application cost 90 000 CHF, while its contractual price was 40 000 CHF.

For those who did not know this method applied by members of the Bar association,  to discover here the case presented to Mrs Nuria GORRITE : 181016DE_NG

To read on pages 8 and 9 comments quoted by 6 judges. They are brilliant! They explain that the codes of procedures allow them to make tell anything to witnesses auditioned in Court!

These judges confirm in this example that the Courts are not competent to enforce the fundamental rights as has already said it Me de ROUGEMONT !

181016DE_NG

181010DE_PM

051217DP_GC

10.10.18 DID THE LAWYER OF THE COUNCIL OF STATE VAUDOIS BETRAY THE CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENCY OF THE SWISS LABOUR UNION?

Cynthia FIVAZ
Me Cynthia FIVAZ
Lawyer of Vaud State Council
FSA MEDIATOR

The angelic smile which adore the members of brotherhoods of lawyers, but which is dangerous for the members of the syndicates who want the respect of their constitutional rights !

AFTER PIERRE MAUDET, PASCAL BROUILIS, IT IS CYNTHIA FIVAZ, A LAWYER OF THE STATE OF VAUD, WHO IS IMPLIED IN INFLUENCE PEDDLING BY BEING AS ACCOMPLICE OF ORGANIZED CRIME AGAINST OUR NATION.

Did Pierre-Yves MAILLARD know the activities of influence peddling of this lawyer of the state Council, when he was President of council of State?

Did she act alone or did she only executed Pierre - Yves MAILLARD's orders, which would have encouraged her to violate) the federal Constitution?

Did she correctly inform Pierre-Yves MAILLARD about her activities, or did she deceive him ?

A story to make shiver behind the scenes of the Council of State.

181010DE_PM

Pierre-Yves MAILLARD was invited to clarify the situation.

If he is involved in this influence peddling to allow a corrupt elite to violate the rights of the other citizens, he will not be credible at the head of the Swiss Labour Union.

To wash his hands, Pierre-Yves MAILLARD absolutely has to pursue a process of confrontation between Me Claude ROUILLER, former federal judge, and Me Rudolf SCHALLER.

It is Claude ROUILLER's answers to questions asked on his report that will allow to establish the Truth.

See part : 180909DE_CR

051217DP_GC

181010DE_PM

180909DE_CR

 

03.10.18 THE UBS BANK IS FACING CRIMINALITY COMMITTED BY MEMBERS OF BROTHERHOOD OF LAWYERS :

The employees of UBS detected the dysfunction of the procedures and gave the alert in time

Sergio Ermotti CEO UBSSergio Ermotti
UBS CEO

It is now the responsibility of the CEO of UBS to take the adequate measures, so that the bank procedures have to assure the security of the financials assets of its customers as well as the respect of the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution

THE EMPLOYEES OF UBS REACT BY DETECTING A DOUBTFUL COURT ORDER WHICH COULD VIOLATE THE SWISS CONSTITUTION

After the violation of the American Constitution with delirious procedures, the employees of UBS learned from defects of bank procedures put in evidence by Bradley Birkenfeld.

It is the Jackpot: they have just detected a doubtful Court ORDER:

De facto, it is members of brotherhoods of lawyers that use their privileges to finance some organized crime by using cunningly services of prosecution.

The chief of the Service of the prosecution, Bertrand TSCHANZ, was warned that he applies codes of procedures which are not applicables.

180929DE_BT

Sergio Ermotti, CEO of UBS, who has the responsibility to ensure that the Bank procedures assure the respect of the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution, was made aware of this swindle. 180929DE_SE

He knows that members of brotherhoods of lawyers, among them Me Foetisch, found the way to finance some organized crime by using cunningly the services of prosecution to make court order with documents established by not competent Courts. 051217DP_GC

It is almost as vicious as the procedures described by Bradley Birkenfeld to violate the Constitution

This time, the CEO of UBS is informed in time to end this violation of the federal Constitution with vicious and delirious procedures. 180929DE_SE

180929DE_SE

051217DP_GC

180929DE_BT

26.09.18 THE RED LIMIT NOT TO BE CROSSED WAS EXCEEDS WITH THE TRAPS USED BY GENERAL PROSECUTORS TO DECEIVE CITIZENS

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF INNOCENT CITIZENS ARE VIOLATED IN a GRIME WAY BY PROSECUTORS

Wolfang WOHLERS, Professor penalist of the University of Basel trembles with indignation in front of the violation of innocents' fundamental rights by deceit

Prof. Wolfgang WOHLERS
Wolfgang WOHLERS
Penalist Professeur
University of Basel

A report by the TSR, not to be missed

An intervention of the Swiss Conference of the Prosecutors was required:

It concerns the case of the VIOLATION OF the RIGHT TO BE HEARD BY NEUTRAL AND INDEPENDENT COURTS, of which his President Fabien GASSER is accused, in response to the considerations of right violation established by Me François de ROUGEMONT

180626DE_FG

VIOLATION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF AN INNOCENT FOR HAVING USED " THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT "

A report of the RTS which shows that we are back in the time of the inquisition of the Middle Ages

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Meu7D3BODSc

OBSERVATION OF a PENALIST PROFESSOR
Trembling with indignation, Wolgang WOHLERS suggests to delete the RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT if the Prosecutors use it as pretext to violate innocents' fundamental rights by deceit with traps.

To note that: the General prosecutor justifies his deceit with traps and the violation of the fundamental rights of an innocent in the only purpose to try to establish the Truth, and without having the assurance to be able to establish it

THE GOLDEN PALM OF THE HORROR FOR THE VIOLATION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF AN INNOCENT IS GIVEN TO the GENERAL PROSECUTOR FABIEN GASSER

While the Prosecution of Fribourg was involved in an case of violation of the access to neutral and independent Courts, established by the processing of a request of parliamentary inquiry.
While Me of ROUGEMONT had explained that the codes of procedures were not applicable in the given context.
While he is the President of the CPS, Prosecutor Fabien GASSER did not hesitate to violate THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD BY NEUTRAL AND INDEPENDENT COURTS to prevent the Truth from being established. His action aimed at allowing a criminal, member of a brotherhood, to escape justice.

OBSERVATION OF A PENALIST PROFESSOR
Prof. F. RIKLIN of the University of FRIBOURG had already given evidence of the violation of the fundamental rights in 2005 for this case. Fabien Gasser who knew it continues to violate the fundamental rights!

To note that contrary to the first Prosecutor, Fabien GASSER violates the fundamental rights to prevent the Truth from being established. He contradicts himself. In an interview given to Sébastien FAURE, he considered that a Prosecutor can violate the fundamental rights in case he wants to establish the Truth

See interview de Fabien Gasser

TO VIOLATE THE "RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT" for establishing the Truth is not the same thing as TO VIOLATE THE "RIGHT TO BE HEARD" for preventing the Truth to be established. Funny defintion of the Truth for Fabien GASSER !

It is the job of the CPS to give its observations on these substantive topics, where Prosecutors do not want to enforce the RULE OF LAW, see : 180626DE_FG

180626DE_FG

051217DP_GC

070116DP_FR

19.09.18 IS THERE ONLY ONE SINGLE PERSON CORRUPTED IN BERN ?
By waiving the immunity of the national Councillor Christian Miesch for a suspicion of passive corruption, the Parliament opened the Pandora's box.

Editorial of the Newspaper: le MATIN par Eric FELLEY 13.09.2018

Serment du Grütli de Christian Miesch
Oath to respect
the federal Constitution:

What meant this Oath for Christian MIESCH, NATIONAL COUNCILLOR ?

What means this oath for Simonetta SOMMARUGA, our Minister of Justice ?,

What means this Oath for Philippe BAUER, national Councillor, when he is in the skin of a President of the bar ?

WHAT IS THE HIDDEN SIDE OF EACH OF OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES? INFLUENCE PEDDLING? UNFAIR MANAGEMENT OF THE INTERESTS OF OURS NATION? WHAT CONTAINS THE PANDORA'S BOX ?

Philippe SCHWAB has already revealed that the elected representatives planned in the law of the Parliament that they can keep silent when they are informed about dysfunction of our institutions.

When we open the Pandora's box, come out that our elected representatives planned the rule that: "the accused has the right to lie to defend itself, nothing of what he says can be retained against him". This rule allows every smart elected representative to violate its Oath to respect the federal Constitution. He just has to lie in a way that a prosecutor cannot prove the direct link between given advantages and counterparty received by the elected representative !

Do you know Philippe Bauer's hidden side, when he is acting in the skin of a President of the bar?
Do you know that he obtained from the federal Court advantages for the members of brotherhoods of lawyers which allow them to commit offences and crimes with complete impunity ?

Do you know that Me François de ROUGEMONT explained that there is no division of powers between brotherhood of lawyers and Courts. He concluded that there are no independent Courts to judge the crimes and the offences committed by members of brotherhoods of lawyers !

What is worth Philippe BAUER's oath to respect the federal Constitution, while he sets up advantages for the members of brotherhoods who allow them to manage disloyally the interests of our people.
Do you know how Philippe BAUER made break a judgment of Neuchâtel Court to allow his colleague, Me Foetisch, to escape the justice for his crimes ?

Discover three questions asked to our Minister of Justice, Simonetta SOMMARUGA, on the advantages that the Presidents of the bar obtained from the Parliament to allow the members of their brotherhoods to escape the justice !

Discover how a big Swiss bank asserts being forced to steal his customers to finance organized crime for members of brotherhoods, further to the advantages given by Phillippe Bauer to the members of its brotherhood.
The key issue: how Simonetta SOMMARUGA, who made the Oath to respect the federal Constitution, is she going to end these advantages ?

To discover Philippe BAUER's hidden side acting in the skin of a President of the bar: answer the three questions asked in the front page of the following document :

180917DE_SS

051217DP_GC

180917DE_SS

070116DP_FR

070329PB_TC

12.09.18 INFLUENCE PEDDLING AND ABSENCE OF SUPERVISORY ORGAN :
The newspaper “La Tribune de Genève” reveals that politicians think of having found the Egg of Colomb to end the abuses of power of magistrates which benefit from hidden compensation by offering advantages to third parties :

WE MUST REQUIRE FROM THE PROSECUTION TO INVESTIGATE INTO THE BENEFITS RECEIVED BY THE MAGISTRATES AS COMPENSATION FOR THE OFFERED ADVANTAGES:

article du 12 septembre 2018 :

FIRST TEST MADE WITH PASCAL BROULIS:

Pascal BROULIS
Pascal BROULIS
State Councillor of Vaud
Decision-maker for the tax-benefits
Very discreet on the financing of its journeys in Russia

To note that the Prosecution has to be independent, or, this egg of Colomb would have to be a new absolute farce!

THE ABSENCE OR THE FAILURE OF SUPERVISERY ORGAN FOR PREVENTING INFLUENCE PEDDLING IS FINALLY RECOGNIZED BY POLITICIANS

To require from the Prosecution to investigate into the benefits received by magistrates as compensation for the advantages which they offer is an initiative to remedy with a stopgap measure to the failure or the absence of supervisory organ.

It would be more effective to set up supervisory organ to verify that the magistrates respect in their decision their Oath to apply the federal Constitution.

It would be essential to make sure that the legislator sets up simple and effective supervision systems for identifying influence peddling.

OF THE SLAP GIVEN BY ME PHILIPPE BAUER, NATIONAL COUNCILLOR, TO THE FEDERAL ASSEMBLY

Do you know that an authorization of the President of the bar is requested for filing a criminal complaint against a Chairman of the Board of a company who commits a criminal offence, in the case where he is a member of a brotherhood of lawyers? ?

Do you know that Me Philippe BAUER, as President of the bar, has explained that:  the Chairman of the Board of a company who commits a criminal offence, has just to ignore the summons of the President of the bar to prevent that the President of the Bar can give an authorization. If the President of the Bar don’t give the authorization, it is not possible to file a criminal complaint against him ? IN PRACTISE HE IS UNTOUCHABLE WITH THIS PRIVILEGE!

Do you know that it is an advantage offered by the legislator to the members of brotherhood? Do you know that this advantage is hidden to our people?

As a result the Egg of Colomb could be a new absolute farce if the Prosecution has its power reduced by the privileges which the members of brotherhoods have set up for them with the approval of the Parliament.

For the national Councillor Philippe BAUER, the Swiss Constitution is not the supreme law which is applicable to the members of brotherhoods. They have a hidden law which allows them to make some influence peddling "legalized by the Parliament of which he is a member ".

OF A SIMPLE AND EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE MEASURE TO FIGHT AGAINST THE INFLUENCE PEDDLING AND THE DISLOYAL MANAGEMENT OF THE INTERESTS OF THE STATE BY MAGISTRATES:

Referring to the obligation of magistrate to respect the federal Constitution, it has been requested from the former federal Judge, Me Claude ROUILLER, to indicate where is written in the law these privileges used by the colleagues of Me Philippe BAUER to give advantages to third parties.

See part 180909DE_CR

051217DP_GC

070329PB_TC

180909DE_CR

 

05.09.18 INFLUENCE PEDDLING AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE PROSECUTORS:
"AN ABSOLUTE FARCE"
REVEALED BY THE NEWSPAPER : « LA TRIBUNE DE GENÈVE », see
:

article du 4 septembre 2018.:

The application laws to enforce the Constitution, set up by the Parliament, allow people in charge of a task of the State, as Pierre MAUDET or Philippe SCHWAB to violate the federal Constitution by making judge their offences by Prosecutors who are not independent.

Pierre Maudet
Pierre MAUDET
State Council President, GE
Head of the Justice, GE
"accused" of influence peddling
Considered innocent

Philippe SCHWAB, General Secretary of the Parliament, as Pierre MAUDET are considered innocents while the facts on the substantive items give evidence that they are involved in influence peddling.

Their acts are investigated by prosecutors who are not independent, that is an absolute farce which allows to explain their choice to make some influence peddling

Analysis of Pierre MAUDET case:

The General prosecutor of the Canton of Geneva depends on Pierre Maudet. He cannot be independent.

On the other hand, he is elected by the Geneve people. If he informs the people that he leads an investigation for influence peddling and lie against Pierre MAUDET, he has a certain life insurance not to be dismissed. Indeed those who will want to censor the investigation could provoke the anger of those who denounce this absolute farce, where the Prosecutor is not independent !

Seen the situation, it is important that all the citizens are informed about the substantive questions. They can so form their own opinion of the capacity of the Prosecutor to enforce the Constitution independently of the influence peddling of which he could be the object!

For the substantive questions, according to his own ethics, the Prosecutor can prevent his investigation to become an absolute farce, by enforcing the Values of the Constitution in his judgment!

 

Analysis of Philippe SCHWAB case:

The General prosecutor of the Confederacy is elected by members of parliament.

If he leads an investigation on Philippe SCHWAB's calumny against Dominique de BUMAN, he will have to accuse the national Councillor Philippe BAUER of influence peddling further to the advantages whom Philippe BAUER gave to Me Foetisch and to his criminal organization.

As the election of the General prosecutor depends in particular on Philippe BAUER, the Prosecutor risks to be dismissed and to be the object of blackmail and influence peddling if he does not give up to the pressure of Philippe BAUER and members of brotherhoods of lawyers.

Seen the situation, it is important that all the citizens are informed about the substantive questions by Philippe SCHWAB. Indeed the latter could also have made the object of blackmail.

Soon, it will be exposed on this site the influence peddling in which is involved the national Councillor Philippe BAUER with millions of damage caused to our Nation.

For the substantive questions, Philippe SCHWAB is considered for the moment innocent. If he made the object of blackmail forcing him to malign Dominique de BUMAN, as well as the Authors and the signatories of the demand of parliamentary inquiry, he has the right of reply!

It is instructed to exercise this right to enforce the Values of the Constitution. See part :

180901DE_PS

051217DP_GC

180825DE_DB

180901DE_PS

29.08.2018 DEMONIC MAIL OF THE SECRETARY OF THE SWISS PARLIAMENT:
Dominique de BUMAN, President of the Parliament, is maligned in a disturbing way by Philippe SCHWAB. He makes him be thought of as a Son of Satan, manipulator

Philippe SCHWAB
Philippe SCHWAB
General Secretary of the Parliament

Philippe SCHWAB, in a demonic mail signed by him only, agrees with the colleague of Pascal COUCHEPIN by questioning the enforcement of the Constitution by Dominique de BUMAN.

Outrageous approach because this mail was not signed by Dominique de BUMAN.

Philippe SCHWAB knows that the President of the federal Assembly, Dominique de BUMAN, has to enforce the federal Constitution. Nevertheless, he agrees with the colleague of Pascal Couchepin. We remind that the latter asserted that most top leaders of the country do not want to enforce any more the federal Constitution. To do it, he maligns Dominique de BUMAN, the first citizen of the Country.

Philippe SCHWAB knows that Dominique de BUMAN is a strong supporter of the Christian Values and that he would not allow to betray our nation by asserting that :

"The Parliament, which has the mission to enforce the federal Constitution, introduced a legislation which allows him to by-pass the compliance of the Constitution for its members "

But that is in fact what Philippe SCHWAB asserts in a mail signed by himself, with a reasoning which leaves stunned.

To do things correctly, this demonic mail was transmitted to Dominique de BUMAN, so that he can contradict it.

We remind here that such a mail serves to cover with the "trading in influence" and millions of damage caused by professionals of the law, who are protected by Presidents of the bar/former Presidents of the bar, as Philippe BAUER, national Councillor !

In each to base judgement on evidence :

180825DE_DB

180703DB_DE

For the non-jurists, we remind here that the federal Constitution is the supreme right and that all the laws must be established to enforce her, including the law on the Parliament !!!!

051217DP_GC

180825DE_DB

15.08.2018 The Bridge of "Dominique de BUMAN" between the Parliament and the Swiss people threatens to collapse as the Bridge MORANDI in Genoa for defect of structure and surveillance

Pont Morandi effondré

Collapse of the Bridge MORANDI due to a critical vulnerability of the bridge structure and well own dysfunctions of the supervision groups : in Italy, Personalities notice that are needed 30 deaths in order that the politicians - who have the duty to assure the safety of the citizens -  assume their duty to make check and maintain Bridges in time !

In Switzerland, it is not better! During the summer period, the Bridge established by Dominique de BUMAN between the people and the supervisory boards of the Parliament did not work.

All the mails requiring measures to end the risks and the damage caused by the critical vulnerability of the judicial system, revealed by Me François de ROUGEMONT, stayed without answer.

The only solution, proposed at present time by a professional of the law to end the critical vulnerability of the judicial system, is the death of a federal Councillor.

The coming to an end summer period, it's time to make sure that the solution proposed by the colleague to Pascal COUCHEPIN - who has this project to eliminate a federal Councillor to assure the safety of the citizens - corresponds to the will of the Parliament as asserts it this Couchepin colleague.

The collapse of the Bridge MORANDI shows that this solution (30 deaths to be heard in this case) seems to be effective to obtain that the political world assumes its responsibilities.

Next publication at the end of August

 

 
  Summer Break Next publication at the middle of August  
04.07.18 2018, UNWORTHY JUSTICE:
Discovery of Black Holes disrupting the decisions of the Parliament which explain the reference made for Maurice BAVAUD by the colleague of Pascal COUCHEPIN.
Nobody anymore will wonder of the elimination of a federal Councillor when the colleague to Pascal COUCHEPIN will carry out his project.

Pascal COUCHEPIN
Pascal COUCHEPIN,
President de la Confederation
Lawyer

2008-unworthy justice-reminder
Pascal COUCHEPIN, President of the Confederacy, denounces the SILENCE AND THE BREACHES of the federal Council in front of a German government applying an unworthy justice that fought Maurice BAVAUD, abandoned by the Swiss Authorities.

La suisse en faute

2016-unworthy justice-reminder
One of the colleagues to Pascal COUCHEPIN, dissident lawyer, accuses the Swiss federal Authorities of applying the methods of the Nazi justice, fought by Maurice BAVAUD, who became a hero of the Roman Catholic Church

2018-unworthy justice-reminder
In front of the violation of human rights by States, Roman Catholic Church makes a commitment to fight against the violation of human rights by the members of the governments. This time, it is the members of federal council who are implicated by the colleague to Pascal COUCHEPIN, further to the SILENCE of the FEDERAL COUNCIL MEMBERS on the critical vulnerability of the judicial system which they hid to the Swiss people.

The President of the federal Assembly, Dominique de BUMAN, the practising Catholic, opened a breach showing the existence of BLACK HOLES in the Parliament.

180626DE_DB

2018, UNWORTHY JUSTICE
In 2005, a request of parliamentary inquiry revealed the existence of hidden relations binding the bar association to the Courts, hidden from the Swiss people by the federal Authorities, allowing the members of brotherhoods of lawyers to commit crimes with complete impunity.

051217DP_GC

This request of investigation showed a dysfunction of the monitoring system of the Parliament checking the respect for the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitutione.

UPDATE ON THE SITUATION, JUNE 2018
Since then the scandals on the violation of the Values of the Constitution by the federal authorities became transparent, but monitoring system are still not functioning, we observe that:

a) Nothing changed since the faults of the federal authorities have been highlighted by the tribute to the memory of Maurice BAVAUD returned by Pascal COUCHEPIN and by the Roman Catholic Church.

b) Nothing changed since the investigation of Lord Charles MOREROD on the violation of human rights in the scandal of the INSTITUTE MARINI.

We observe simply that not only the monitoring system for controlling the respect of the fundamental rights is always neutralized by those who exercise an unworthy justice, but that now, they are lawyers - who want to denounce the violation of human rights - who are the object of constraint exercised by criminal organizations involving elected representatives.

 

OF THE PRESENCE OF BLACK HOLES IN THE PARLIAMENT

Recently, M Dominique de BUMAN, who shows his Values of practising Catholic and who made a commitment to break silence on the critical vulnerability of the judicial system, shows that there are Black Holes in the Parliament which force to SILENCE the members of the supervisory boards of the Parliament.

There are de facto members of parliament who have the power to silence all the members of supervisory boards who must control that the Values of the federal Constitution are respected.

 

OF THE ALERT PUT OUT BY THE COLLEAGUE TO PASCAL COUCHEPIN

We can appreciate that a lawyer has the courage to denounce the critical vulnerability of the judicial system by showing that it is associated with its corporation.

We can appreciate that this lawyer made a reference to Maurice BAVAUD and set the project to eliminate a federal Councillor for ending this critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

On the other hand, as citizens of sovereign people, we cannot tolerate that the members of supervisory boards, who must check that the fundamental rights are respected, allow BLACK HOLES of the PARLIAMENT to establish a climate of terror in Switzerland by exercising some constraint on lawyers.

 

OF THE FAULT OF THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSIONS OF SURVEILLANCE WHO TURN A BLIND EYE ON THE WAY USED BY ME FOETISCH TO FINANCE HIS CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION, BY MAKING EXERCISE SOME CONSTRAINT ON LAWYER WITH THE CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF the JUDICIAL SYSTEM

The constraint exercised by Me Foetisch and the members of his criminal organization to establish a climate of terror in Switzerland do not any more allow the members of the commissions of surveillance to keep silent.

They have to resign, or to end this climate of terror which justifies the project of elimination of a federal Councillor by the colleague to Pascal COUCHEPIN.

All the members of the Commissions of surveillance of the Parliament are instructed to break the silence further to the commitment taken by their President not to turn a blind eye to the critical vulnerability of the judicial system

180702DE_CG

051217DP_GC

180626DE_DB

180702DE_CG

 

27.06.18 REQUEST OF INTERVENTION OF POPE FRANCOIS WHO IS LISTENED AND RESPECTED BY Alain BERSET

Alain écoute le Pape FrançoisThursday, June 20th

Alain BERSET meets POPE FRANÇOIS, Head of State of Vatican, who is also the spiritual leader of the Roman Catholic Church.

It is time to remind the existence of the request of parliamentary inquiry, which notices the violation of human rights by the Swiss justice.

051217DP_GC

POPE FRANÇOIS IS INFORMED ABOUT THE CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM WITH THE ATTITUDE OF DENIAL of Alain BERSET WHO DOES NOT ACT IN FRONT OF THE CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION WHICH VIOLATES THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE WEAKEST CITIZENS

He knows now that Mr. Dominique de BUMAN and Mrs Doris LEUTHARD, who received him in the presence of Alain BERSET, are witnesses of the violation of the fundamental rights with the critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

He also knows now that freemasons, who deny the existence of GOD, are members of the criminal organization which allows Me Foetisch and his colleagues to commit crimes with complete impunity with the power and help of the Swiss Courts.

If GOD exists, POPE FRANCOIS should be able to convince Alain BERSET - who listens to him and respects him - to enforce the fundamental rights of all the Swiss citizens by ending the existence of the critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

Alain BERSET has taken the oath to respect the federal Constitution.

By taking measures to make condemn those who violate the fundamental rights of the weakest with the critical vulnerability of the judicial system, Alain BERSET would make only his duty of function of President of the Confederacy!

180626DE_PF

180626DE_AB

051217DP_GC

180626DE_PF

180626DE_AB

27.06.18 INVESTIGATION INTO THE SCANDAL OF CORRUPTION BOUND TO the REPORT OF THE FORMER FEDERAL JUDGE CLAUDE ROUILLER:

PARLEMENT_SUISSE

JEAN-BENOÌT MEUWLY, PRESIDENT OF the COURT OF LA BROYE, HAS BEEN GIVEN NOTICE TO EXPLAIN ITS BEHAVIOR IN FRONT OF THE PARLIAMENT

 

CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF THE JUDICIARY SYSTEM : J.-B. MEUWLY HAS BEEN GIVEN NOTICE TO EXPLAIN WITHIN 10 DAYS ITS BEHAVIOR TO THE COMMITTEES OF SURVEILLANCE OF the PARLIAMENT

See part: 180610DE_JM

The scandal of CARPOSTAL showed the dysfunction of the supervisory boards of the State.

Jean-Benoît MEUWLY, President of the COURT of “la BROYE”, makes a masterful demonstration how the COURTS CAN BE ACCOMPLICE OF CORRUPTION if the supervisory boards of the State do not react in time in front of a critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

He tries even to make the President of the Chamber of the pursuits and the bankruptcies CANTONAL, Madam Catherine OVERNAY, complicit in hiding to her the existence of the critical vulnerability of the judicial system. See part: 180620 DE_CO

We observe that he gives the date of June 7th to his mail, (180607JM_DE) while he had already received the mail of June 10th where he has been given notice to explain its behaviour to the committees of surveillance of Parliament !

If the judges - who have to enforce the fundamental rights - can be financed by the State to create damage of several millions by violating these rights:  The first curative measure is to make them jointly responsible for the damage that they create, rather than to finance these magistrates with our taxes to create the damages for a minority corrupt elite: Let us follow the example of South Korea !

051217DP_GC

180610DE_JM

180620 DE_CO

13.06.18 FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION OF HIGH MAGISTRATES AND STATE OFFICER:
The removal of the President of South Korea by NETIZENS is reminded to the General prosecutor Fabien Gasser. It is also reminded to him that the Fribourgeois Prosecution, at the head of which he is, took hostage a lawyer to cover the passive corruption of the former federal judge Me Claude ROUILLER.
(Me BK was the object of a false denunciation suspended by the Prosecution to vitiate the civil procedure as revealed by a dissident lawyer, who has belonged to the dark world, 170916DE_TC)

Park_Geun_Hye
Park Geun-Hye
President of South Korea
Removed by public-spirited Internet users : THE NETIZENS

In this context, which nobody anymore can ignore, Fabien GASSER applies a code of procedure which is not applicable to cover passive corruption. He does it with full knowledge of the facts. Fabien GASSER has been given a formal notice to explain within 10 days his behaviour to the commissions of surveillancee
180610DE_FG

The Court has been made aware that it is not competent to handle the case further to the existence of the critical vulnerability of the judicial system

180610DE_JM

THE SOUTH KOREAN NETIZENS, WITH A STEP AHEAD ON THE SWISS CITIZENS, SHOWED THAT IN FRONT OF FAILING MONITORING SYSTEM OF THE POLITICAL WORLD AND IN FRONT OF THE CORRUPTION OF TOP LEADERS AND STATE OFFICER:
THEY HAVE THE POWER TO ENFORCE THE VALUES OF THEIR CONSTITUTION

See the upholders of the law of the NET:
(Envoyé spécial / France 2 du 8 juin 2018)

THEY HAVE INVENTED THE SIMPLE SOLUTION!
In front of magistrates who do not investigate and hinder the legal action, in front of media which do not tell the truth, the NETIZENS, public-spirited Internet users, leads their own investigation in a neutral and independent way of the Prosecutor, judicial Authorities and the media.

They publish these inquiries on the NET by showing how the corrupt politicians and the disrespectful employees of the Values of the Constitution proceed to allow a corrupt elite to violate the Values of their Constitution.

The NETIZENS require furthermore that the members of the corrupt elites have to pay off the damage with which they are in collusion.

The efficiency of their action was shown with the scandal of corruption of their President and his inner circle! With their investigation, they managed to make her remove, and to make her condemn by elected representatives who did not want to be in collusion with this corruption.

OF OURS INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION ON THE SCANDAL OF PASSIVE CORRUPTION BOUND TO THE CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND TO THE ROLE OF THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR FABIEN GASSER

The General Prosecutor Fabien GASSER and his deputy know well the request of parliamentary inquiry 051217DP_GC, and its processing made by Me de ROUGEMONT.

They know that the codes of procedures cannot take into account the hidden relations which bind the Bar association to the Courts. They know that it is a critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

They know that Me Foetisch and the members of the criminal organization - who protect him - uses this vulnerability of the judicial system to commit crimes with complete impunity. They know that the commission of surveillance have been alerted.

...Nevertheless, they continue to help Me Foetisch and his criminal organization to commit crimes with complete impunity and to escape the justice by applying these codes of procedure which are not applicable to cover this scandal of violation of the Values of the Swiss Constitution.

Within the framework of this scandal of corruption, where the Fribourgeois Prosecution even took hostage a lawyer by suspending a false denunciation of Me Foetisch for vitiating civil procedure, instead to investigate it, the General Prosecutor Fabien GASSER has been given notice to explain his behaviour to the Commissions of surveillance
180610DE_FG

051217DP_GC

180610DE_JM

180610DE_FG

 

06.06.18 THE OECD ASSERTS THAT THE SWISS CAN DO BETTER TO FIGHT AGAINST THE CORRUPTION:
A NATIONAL COUNCILLOR SAYS THE MEA CULPA OF THE PARLIAMENT WHICH DOES NOT ACT IN TIME!

Hugues HILTPOLD
Hugues HILTPOLD
Architect, national Councillor
Committee management member

Our national Councillor, Hugues Hiltpold, is not selling any alibis. He noted that :
" The processes of corruption described by two journalists show that the Parliament does not act in time!"

It's time that the Committee of management reacts in time in front of the critical vulnerability of the judicial system!

180605DE_HH

A REPORT OF THE OECD SHOWING THAT THE CORRUPTION IS ALSO A PLAGUE IN SWITZERLAND BRING TWO JOURNALISTS TO INVESTIGATE INTO THE SCANDALS OF CORRUPTION WHICH SHAKE THE SWITZERLAND (Temps Présent, jeudi 31 mai 2018)

Eric Serge JEANNET, of the federal control of the finances, interviewed on one of the biggest financial scandals bound to the corruption, gives the key of the problem, quote :
«There are people who have a high position, where they can make decisions without the other people can contradict them, or question them »

The investigative journalist, Arnaud BÉDAT, describes the reprisals which undergo really, those who take the risk to denounce the violation of the Values of the Constitution, as he has experienced it himself.

The General prosecutor of the Canton of Geneva underlines that reprisals against whistle-blower is not the alone problem to eradicate the corruption: the Prosecutors are also helpless against corruption process to enforce the Values of the Constitution !

Thanks to our national Councillor Hugo HILTPOLD to notice that it is to the Parliament and to the Commissions of surveillance to act in time !
See part 180605DE_HH

Thanks to the journalists Yannick TENET and Dominique WILLEMIN for their broadcasted investigation which shows that the problem of the corruption in Switzerland, could be summarized with this sentence :
« There are people who have a high position, where they can take decisions without the other people can contradict them, or question them »

This sentence applies in any case to the former federal judge Claude ROUILLER who makes false reports, as well as for Me Foetisch, who for more than 20 years compromises all the Swiss justice and makes a fool of all the Prosecutors with his criminal organization.
These two figures have effectively a position more than high in Switzerland, ……as they are even protected by a critical vulnerability of the judicial system put in place by the members of their network

Again the Parliament has not reacted yet, while it knows that a lawyer asserts that the Swiss needs a Maurice BAVAUD so that their government enforces the Values of the federal Constitution! (See comments below of May 9th, 2018)

180605DE_HH
30.05.18 MICHAEL LAUPER IS MADE AWARE OF HIS OBLIGATION TO DENOUNCE LAW VIOLATIONS FOR RESPECTING THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION

Michael_Lauper
Michael LAUPER
General Prosecutor of the
Swiss Confederation

The General Prosecutor of the Confederation was warned that a plane has to crash on the Parliament !

Question : what is his duty if he has no competence to act in time as consequence of the existence of the critical vulnerability of the judicial system ?

THE PROSECUTION OF THE CONFEDERATION IS CLARIFYING THE FEDERAL COMPETENCE, FURTHER TO the CRIMES COMMITTED BY THE PROFESSIONALS OF THE LAW WITH THE HIDDEN RELATIONS WHICH BIND THEM TO the COURTS.

This clarification was announced on December 14th, 2017. It is still not ended. 171214MP_DE

Since then, members of Me Foetisch’s life, who exploit the critical vulnerability of the judicial system to violate the fundamental rights, are taking advantage of this waiting time to keep exploiting the critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

They exploit it while they know that they are the object of a criminal complaint lodged at the  Prosecution of the Confederation and that the latter wants at first to clarify the federal competence to enforce the fundamental rights, further to the existence of this critical vulnerability of the codes of procedures.

In view of the gravity of the facts and the obligation to denounce in case of incompetence

Given that the majority of the citizens are taken for idiots by a minority elite which allows Me Foetisch and his entourage, among them Prosecutor Raphaël BOURQUIN, to commit crimes with complete impunity,
See part : 180501DE_RB

The General Prosecutor of the Confederacy, Michael LAUPER is made aware of his obligation to denounce the existence of this critical vulnerability of the judicial system to the Commissions of management of the Parliament.
See part
: 180530DE_ML

The same approach was made with the President of the Penal Chamber of the cantonal Court of Fribourg, M. Hubert BUGNON
See part :
180529DE_HB

On his side, Sir Bertrand TSCHANZ shows that the code of procedure allows him to held bank as hostage for financing the crimes committed by the criminal organization which uses the critical vulnerability of the judicial system.
See part:
180529DE_BT

051217DP_GC

180501DE_RB

180530DE_ML

180529DE_HB

23.05.18 CRITICAL VULNERABILIY OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM : THE PRESIDENT OF THE PENAL CHAMBER OF THE FRIBOURG CANTONAL COURT IS MADE AWARE OF HIS OBLIGATION TO DENOUNCE LAW VIOLATIONS TO RESPECT THE VALUES OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION

Hubert BUGNON
Hubert BUGNON
President of the Penal Chamber
Fribourg Cantonal Court

What is going to do this President of the Cantonal Court to honour his Oath to make apply the Values of the federal Constitution in view of the existence of the critical vulnerability of the judicial system, highlighted by the processing of the request of parliamentary inquiry?

See part 180519DE_HB

The cantonal and federal Committees of surveillance were informed about this critical vulnerability of the judicial system which the code of procedure does not allow to manage!

180519DE_GC

180521DE_DF

180521DE_AS

The criminal complaint, sent to Alain BERSET, was updated:

180521DE_AB

ART. 302, CP 312 : OBLIGATION TO DENOUNCE
"The penal authorities have to denounce to competent authorities all the breaches which they noticed in the exercise of their duties or who were announced to them if they are not competent themselves to pursue them "

WHAT HAS TO DO Mr HUBERT BUGNON TO HONOR HIS OATH TO MAKE APPLY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION, FURTHER TO WHAT IT WAS DULY INFORMED ABOUT THE CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM WHICH USE THE MAGISTRATES, AMONG THEM PROSECUTOR RAPHAËL BOURQUIN, TO TAKE THE 90% OF THE CITIZENS FOR “IDIOTS” BY VIOLATING IN A GRIME WAY THE GUARANTEED FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION?

See part : 180501DE_RB
and part: 180504RB_TC

The critical vulnerability of the judicial system, according to the facts established with Me de ROUGEMONT during the processing of the request of parliamentary inquiry, made that the codes of procedures are not applicable. We deduct from this statement that a Cantonal Presiding judge, quibbling, could use this statement to pretend that he is not kept by the obligation to denounce as the code of procedure is not applicable !

It is in any case what would argue the members of the criminal organization who allow Me FOETISCH to commit crimes with complete impunity with the critical vulnerability of the judicial system! It is the vulnerability which uses Prosecutor Raphaël Bourquin to cover organised crime !

180521DE_AB

According to the Spirit of the laws, even if the codes of procedures are not applicable, the federal Constitution is applicable. It is the supreme law, which makes the reference !

The duty of every sworn senior magistrate being to respect the supreme right, and particularly the article 35 of the federal Constitution, we observe that the duty, in any case morale of Hubert BUGNON, is to inform the Parliament surveillance Commission of the existence of the critical vulnerability of the judicial system. He has to specify that he has no independence and no competence to judge the acts of abuse of authority of Prosecutor Raphaël Bourquin in this given context ! 180508DE_TC

He could even recommend to the Parliament commissions of management to organize a confrontation with Me Claude ROUILLER and to make public the recording which heard the federal Councillor Doris LEUTHARD who shows some blackmail with threaten of dismissal to cover organised crime. He could so highlight the critical vulnerability of the judicial system which hides millions of damage by respecting his Oath to make apply the federal Constitution !

IN VIEW OF the GIVEN CONTEXT, WHAT IS GOING TO MAKE THE PRESIDENT OF the CANTONAL COURT, HUBERT BUGNON, TO DENOUNCE THE ACTS OF ABUSE OF AUTHORITY OF PROSECUTOR RAPHAËL BOURQUIN???

180519DE_HB

051217DP_GC

180501DE_RB

180504RB_TC

180508DE_TC

180507HB_DE

180519DE_HB

180519DE_GC

180521DE_DF

180521DE_AS

180521DE_AB

 

 

16.05.18 SWISS FINANCIAL CENTER ENDANGERED BY ONE "WE" WHO WORK FOR A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION ALLOWING the MEMBERS OF BROTHERHOODS TO COMMIT CRIMES  WITH COMPLETE IMPUNITY

Markus ITH
Markus ITH
President Grand Council Fribourg

Our new President of the Big Council of Fribourg, Markus ITH listen to the citizens.
For the next judicial elections, it has been reported to him that several senior government officials and magistrates make an excessive use of a critical vulnerability of the judicial system and that they are the object of a criminal complaint. It is recommended not to elect magistrates who work against the interest of our nation and who take the 90 % of the citizens for "IDIOTS".
See part :180513DE_MI
See part : 180501DE_RB

FRIBOURGEOIS MAGISTRATES WHO USE THE CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM WITH THE COMPLICITY OF BERTRAND TSCHANZ CUNNINGLY WANTS TO FORCE SWISS BANKS TO FINANCE SOME ORGANIZED CRIME BY EMPTYING THE ACCOUNTS OF THE VICTIMS AND BY DECEIVING CUNNINGLY BANKS. SEE PART : 180513DE_BT

THE ALERT IS GIVEN TO BANKS AND TO COMMISSIONS OF SURVEILLANCE OF the SWISS PARLIAMENT AND TO THE PRESIDENT OF FRIBOURGEOIS COUNCIL OF STATE:
See part 180513DE_AS
See part 180513DE_CM
See part 180513DE_GG

GOOD NEWS FOR THE CRIMINAL ORGANIZATIONS:
By knowing that the Price of the justice is proportional in its control by corrupt elites, the SWISS receives the best score for the exorbitant price of its justice
See article of May 10th of Beobachter:

As prestigious award for the authors of this unequalled score in the glory of the corrupt Swiss elites:

We recommend to nominate Dr Adrian URWYLER for its code of procedure which is at the origin of a justice which violates systematically the right to be heard and which blows up its price

To offer the prestigious OSCAR of “the magistrate who takes the 90 % of the citizens for "idiots" “ to The Prosecutor Raphaël Bourquin.

THE GOLDEN PALM to the criminal Organization of Me FOETISCH who shows how high magistrates can violate the fundamental rights of the citizens in Switzerland.

AWARD GIVEN BY THE 90 % OF THE CITIZENS WHO ARE TAKEN FOR "IDIOTS" BY THESE PROFESSIONALS OF THE LAW I

To reward these magistrates for their remarkable deceits, the citizens who are taken for idiots, that means the majority of the citizens of our State, recommend to Nicolas CHARRIÈRE, President of the Commission of surveillance of the Judicial Council, to propose to the Big Council fribourgeois :

"To elect magistrates who respect the federal Constitution, instead of these magistrates who violate their Oath to respect the federal Constitution by taking the 90 % of the citizens for idiots to serve the interests of a corrupt elite and those of the criminal organizations instead of those of the majority of the citizens."

See part : 180513DE_CM

051217DP_GC

180501DE_RB

180513DE_BT

 

180513DE_MI

180513DE_CM

180513DE_GG

 

180513DE_AS

180513DE_CM

09.05.18 "WE" FOUND ANOTHER WAY TO VIOLATE THE VALUES OF THE SWISS CONSTITUTION:

Georges GODEL
Georges GODEL
Farmer-Entrepreneur
President of Council of State

This President of Council of State, who is also taken for a "IDIOT" by Prosecutor Raphaël BOURQUIN, has the power to enforce the Values of the Constitution.
As PDC farmer entrepreneur, he should be interested in the general interest of our people, who is the one of the 90 % of the citizens taken for "IDIOTS" by the criminal organization to which belongs Me Foetisch

REMINDER: Bertrand TSCHANZ, PROSECUTION OFFICE CHIEF, MADE TAKE HOSTAGE A FAMILY BY THE BANK BCV TO FINANCE SOME ORGANIZED CRIME COMMITTED BY MAGISTRATES OF THE STATE OF FRIBOURG WHO TAKE THE 90 % OF THE CITIZENS FOR "IDIOTS"

First surprising fact:

The managing director of the BCV, invited to justify this hostage taking after having been informed about the content of the case, let know that Bertrand TSCHANZ had removed his request of seizure.

Second surprising fact:

Bertrand TSCHANZ contacted then by telephone one of the hoirs to tell him, quote :

"WE" found another way ....."

The "WE" is a new danger for the federal Council

The "WE" then showed itself to get the proof the dissident lawyer needed. We remind that this lawyer, who worked with the Swiss underworld, said that the words are of use to nothing more and that Switzerland needs a Maurice BAVAUD who shoots down a federal Councillor in order that the AUTHORITIES enforce again the Values of the Constitution.

The "WE" show clearly the existence of a corrupt elite which takes the 90 % of the citizens for "IDIOTS" by financing magistrates such Prosecutor Raphaël BOURQUIN with public money to destroy the Values of the Constitution.

It would be surprising that Georges GODEL, who is also taken for a "IDIOT" by the "WE", does not make his work of President of council of STATE when he will discover the case content.
See part 180509DE_GG

051217DP_GC

180509DE_GG

02.05.18 THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR OF FRIBOURG, RAPHAËL BOURQUIN, TAKES FOR "IDIOTS" THE ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES AND THE CITIZENS WHO WANT THE COURTS TO RESPECT THE VALUES OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF CRIMES COMMITTED WITH THE HIDDEN RELATIONS LINKING THE BAR ASSOCIATION TO THE COURTS

Bruno BOSCHUNG
Bruno BOSCHUNG
Member of Parliament
President of Parliament in 2017

Bruno BOSCHUNG, President of the Fribourg Parliament in 2017, contrary to Prosecutor Raphaël Bourquin, worried about the contents of the demand of parliamentary inquiry. In a few minutes, he discovered the existence of the hidden relations which bind the Bar association to the Courts. He understood how Me Foetisch and his team used the power of the Courts to commit crimes with complete impunity. He made a commitment to clarify this critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

The Prosecutor BOURQUIN then makes Bruno BOSCHUNG sound like as an "IDIOT" as the 90 % of the citizens"

To be called "idiot" by a cheater who violates his Oath to respect the federal Constitution does not allow to erase the act of abuse of authority. On the contrary, it is an encouragement to clarify the situation, see part :
180502DE_BB

REMINDER, THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR BOURQUIN HAS ALREADY SHOWN THAT HE USED HIS BIG POWER OF PROSECUTOR  TO MYSTIFY OUR PEOPLE AND TO SERVE THE INTERESTS OF A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION. SEE COMMENTS BELOW AT THE DATE OF 30.09.17. HE UPHOLDS THE VALUES OF A GARGAMEL INSTEAD OF THOSE OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION.
WHILE HE IS THE OBJECT OF A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, HE IS AGAIN A BLESSING FOR THIS CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION, BUT A MAJOR DANGER FOR THE 90 % OF THE CITIZENS EXPECTING FROM A PROSECUTOR THAT HE RESPECTS HIS OATH AND HIS DUTY TO ENFORCE THE VALUES OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION

With breathtaking arrogance, while he is the object of a criminal complaint and while he is stackholder in a conflict, Prosecutor Raphaël Bourquin delivers a new judgment to cover his acts of abuse of authority in this conflict, rather than to recuse himself. The kicker is that the criminal complaint, which he judges, was not sent to him because he was stackholder.

With this new act of abuse of authority, he makes look like such a fool all the elected representatives who worry about the violation of the Values of the Constitution with the hidden relations which bind the members of brotherhoods of lawyers to the Courts and who expressed their will not to turn a blind eye on this critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

Among them, we have :

Bruno BOSCHUNG,

Doris LEUTHARD

Dominique de BUMAN

Me François de ROUGEMONT

Me Rudolf SCHALLER

The dissident lawyer

The WITNESSES of the violation of the fundamental rights by the members of brotherhoods of lawyers who files the demand of parliamentary inquiry

....especially the 90 % of the citizens who cannot trust anymore the Swiss justice.

Bruno BOSCHUNG understood at once, that if an authorization of the President of the bar is needed to lodge a complaint against a President administrator who commits a crime and who is a member of a brotherhood of lawyers, while no authorization is needed to lodge a complaint against a President administrator, who is not a member of a brotherhood of lawyers :
There is violation in a grime way of the Values of the Constitution .....

A new complaint is lodged against Prosecutor Bourquin for its new act of abuse of authority in front of a COURT which does not still exist, but which is planned and guaranteed by the federal Constitution

See part: 180501DE_RB

051217DP_GC

180502DE_BB

180501DE_RB

25.04.18 TAKEN HOSTAGE OF A FAMILY BY A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION TO COVER THE CRIMES COMMITTED BY ME FOETISCH WITH THE HIDDEN RELATIONS BINDING HIS BROTHERHOOD TO THE COURTS

Alain BERSET
Alain BERSET
President of the Confederation

Alain BERSET called as additional help to end the taken hostage of a family showing into the open the way used by corrupt elites in Switzerland to violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution

If Alain Berset, touched, wrote to the  Scanio family who has been despised by the Authorities, he cannot tolerate the taken hostage of a family by a criminal organization, which shows an obvious violation of the Values of the Constitution by a corrupt elite

IN APRIL, 2016, THE DISSIDENT LAWYER HAD NOT EXAGGERATED WHEN HE SAID THAT THE WORDS ARE OF USE TO NOTHING MORE AND THAT SWITZERLAND NEEDS A NEW MAURICE BAVAUD WHO SHOOT A FEDERAL COUNCILLOR FOR RESTORING THE RESPECT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.

Mr ERNI HAS JUST HAD HIS FAMILY TAKEN HOSTAGE BY A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION TO BLACKMAIL HIM!

In 2016, the dissident lawyer had warned Mr ERNI that the Federal Court would prevent his lawyer from representing him in front of the Big Council on the report of the former federal judge, Claude ROUILLER, where his right to be heard had been violated, while this report was disputed for its obvious hypocrisy, attested with the elements established with Me of ROUGEMONT.

As Mr. Erni had announced that he would not give up enforcing his fundamental right to be heard, guaranteed by the federal Constitution, the dissident lawyer had warned him that it had to deal with members of a criminal organization, quote :

"c’est incroyable vous m’apprenez que vous voulez recourir au TF pour que votre avocat puisse vous représenter devant le Grand Conseil alors que Me Bettex vous a refusé ce droit. Je vous mets en garde qu’ils vont vous censurer et essayer par tous les moyens de vous anéantir. J’ai appartenu à leur milieu et vous n’avez aucune idée des moyens qu’ils peuvent utiliser"

See part: 161003DE_IG

Reprisals are even worse than those whom the dissident lawyer had announced. Now, those who want to prevent that Me SCHALLER is heard on the Claude ROUILLER's report got in touch with Mr. Erni's members of the family to threaten them with damage to silence Mr. Erni on this critical vulnerability of the judicial system used by professionals of the law to commit crimes with complete impunity.

See part 180425DE_AB

Thank you, Alain BERSET to enforce the Values of the Constitution

It is not any more a question here of identifying the direction in which swims the fish on the Flag of the City of Nyon, but to end the actions of a criminal organization protected by a corrupt elite.

051217DP_GC

161003DE_IG

180425DE_AB

18.04.18 ULRICH MEYER, PRESIDENT OF the FEDERAL COURT, CONFIRMED ITS INCOMPETENCE TO DEAL WITH THE ISSUE OF THE CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF the JUDICIAL SYSTEM

Anne SEYDOUX-CHRISTE
Anne SEYDOUX-CHRISTE
Living in Délémont
(Jurist of The Uni of Fribourg)
PRESIDENTE of CDG-E

HEAVY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE JURA JURIST, THE PRESIDENT OF THE COMMISSION OF MANAGEMENT OF THE PARLIAMENT, TO END THE CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM

To be President of the Commission of surveillance of the Parliament, it is to be responsible for assuring that the Values of the Constitution are respected or to take the necessary corrective actions

It is interesting to note that the President of the federal Court confirms not only that he is not competent to deal with the critical vulnerability of the judicial system, but he specifies that in the past he would have already indicated in October, 2014, the weaknesses of the procedural system which allow professionals of the law to by-pass the respect of the Values of the Constitution.

TO GOVERN: IT IS TO ENFORCE THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION.
THE PARLIAMENT COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT, WHOSE THE JURIST OF DÉLÉMONT IS THE PRESIDENT, HAS  THE RESPONSIBILITY TO CHECK THAT THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION ARE EFFECTIVELY MET WITH THE LAWS OF APPLICATION SET UP BY THE PARLIAMENT AS WELL AS  TO TAKE THE CURATIVE MEASURES IN CASE OF NON-RESPECT OF THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION.

Of the Existence of corrupt Elites of Leaders
Recently, the national Councillor Regula Rytz highlighted the dysfunctions of a public service by the actions of a corrupt elite and a monitoring system which does not work, to see below comments dated March 21st, 2018.

The paper of the former Vaud Deputy, Pierre Santschi entitled :
LA CONSTITUTION EN ETAT DE DISGRÂCE, 24 Heures of 21.03.2018,
shows that the corrupt elites are a threat for the Swiss democracy.

Of the Critical Vulnerability of the judicial System
After that the critical vulnerability of the judicial system was duly explained to Ulrich Meyer, President of the federal Court, quote:

« En 1994, j’ai signé un contrat avec un Président administrateur d’entreprise qui était avocat de métier.
Dans ce contrat, il n’était pas précisé qu’il existe une relation cachée qui lie les avocats aux tribunaux, soit une « disposition légale », cachée à la majorité du peuple, qui stipule que l’on doit obtenir une autorisation du Bâtonnier pour pouvoir porter plainte pénale contre un Président administrateur d’entreprise, qui est avocat de métier, alors qu’il n’en faut pas pour pouvoir porter plainte pénale contre un Président administrateur d’entreprise,  qui n’est pas avocat….. »

...see part 180327DE_TF

Ulrich MEYER confirmed that he had no competence to end this hidden relation which allows a corrupt elite to commit some organized crime with the power of the Courts, see part 180410TF_DE

Of Anne Seydoux's responsibility
It is reminded to the Jura jurist that these hidden relations have already provoked a request of parliamentary inquiry. It belongs to this President of the Parliament Committee of management to check that Swiss citizens, who could be her children, are not betrayed by this corrupt elite, quote:

« Lors de cette audience, nous avons été témoins de pratiques utilisées qui font frémir. Elles mettent en cause toute la crédibilité et l’indépendance de notre justice en particulier face à l'Ordre des avocats. Elles violent la Convention Européenne des Droits de l'Homme à laquelle la Suisse a adhéré »

See part 180417DE_CE

051217DP_GC

180328DE_CE

180327DE_TF

180410TF_DE

180417DE_CE

11.04.18 IT’S JUST LIKE WE ARE AT BROADCASTED GAME OF KOH-LANTA !!!

GOVERNMENT OF VAUD STATE :
THE REIGN OF THE SUSPICION

Nuria GORRITE
Nuria GORRITE
President of Council of State

Citizens are ready to give “Mobile phones”  to the Members of the Council of State, so that they can launch alerts to the Press for magistrate suspected of violating the federal Constitution without the risk to be identified on their "Mobile phone" invoice

THE COUNCIL OF STATE OF VAUD PUBLICLY ANNOUNCED THAT  IT SET UP A TREACHEROUS MEASURE TO IDENTIFY THE LAUNCHER  OF ALERTS TO THE PRESS FOR THEIR MEMBERS WHO ARE SUSPECTED TO VIOLATE  THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION.

They are going to analyze the phone invoices of their colleagues to identify the members who launch alerts by leaking information out to the Press

The public announcement already shows that a part of the Members of the Council of State do not approve the measure, but undergo it !

TO GOVERN, IT IS TO RESPECT THE VALUES OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION, BUT IT IS NOT TO PLAY the GAME OF KOH-LANTA WITH  ITS TREACHEROUS RULES

See part 180411DE_NG

The Members of the  Vaud Council of State, who want to enforce the Values of the federal Constitution could benefit from the help of an association of citizens to launch alerts without being worried by the analysis of their phone invoice.

The Council of  VAUD State has to require from the former federal judge, Claude ROUILLER, that he must explain publicly it contested report in its context to end in a credible way the reign of the suspicion.

Further to the set up of this treacherous rule of censorship set up by the Council of State, the mail sent to Cesla AMARELLE was communicated to the President of the Council of State. It is a public confrontation of Claude ROUILLER with those who disputed his expertise which can end the reign of the suspicion. In fact, it is the opposite of this measure of censorship with the surveillance of phone invoice which is necessary, because this measure of censorship can only aggravate this suspicion !!!

180403DE_CA

180411DE_NG

180403DE_CA

04.04.18 DYSFUNCTION OF A PUBLIC SERVICE: A YOUNG MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL OF STATE HOLD ALL THE CARDS TO RESTORE THE RESPECT FOR THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS!

Cesla AMARELLE
Celsa AMARELLE
Councillor of VAUD STATE

Madam Cesla AMARELLE wants to clarify the dysfunctions of the public service and to learn from it to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution, but she will not obtain it with an investigation made by the former federal judge Claude ROUILLER

See part: 180403DE_CA

Apparently we hid her that the former federal judge, Claude ROUILLER, has already made an expertise challenged for its unsoundness and bad faith to hide the dysfunctions of a service of the State. She don't know that a criminal complaint has been lodged against criminal organization, and that Claude ROUILLER is directly concerned by this penal complaint with his expertise where he denies the dysfunctions of a service public established with an other expert.

 

THE STATE OF VAUD HAS ONE OF THE STRONGER CASE OF DYSFUNCTION OF A PUBLIC SERVICE WITH CHILDREN DECEIVED FOR YEARS BY THEIR FATHER DIRECT CONSEQUENCE OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE PROCEDURES WHICH DO NOT ALLOW TO ENFORCE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE CITIZENS

The federal Constitution in state of disgrace (page 4 of the newspaper 24 HOURS of March 21st, 2018):
It is the Title of the article where, “the guest” : Pierre SANTSCHI, former deputy of the Big Council of the State VAUD, sound the alarm on the violation of the Values of the Constitution by the members of the Swiss Authorities, who forget to respect their Oath to enforce the fundamental rights in their decisions.

See extract article : 180321_24H

The contents of this article were taken back and quoted by several Internet users who severely criticized the investigation entrusted by the State of VAUD to the former federal judge Claude ROUILLER.

Mr Erni received the request of several Internet users to inform the Councillor Cesla AMARELLE of the false expertise which this former federal judge made for the Council of State with the aim of denying the dysfunctions of a Service of the State. Expertise which had been made after these dysfunctions had been already established and explained by Me De ROUGEMONT in 2007 within the framework of the processing of the request of a parliamentary inquiry (051217DP_GC).

Mr Erni then simply invited the Council of State to organize a broadcast public debate so that every citizen has the ability to enquire of the situation in an independent way, (see part 180403DE_CA page 3, quote :

"Il y a actuellement plainte pénale contre organisation criminelle suite à cette fausse expertise de l’ancien juge fédéral Claude ROUILLER  utilisée par l’Etat de Vaud pour vicier un jugement. L’affaire est devant les Commissions de gestion du Parlement.

Dans l’esprit du respect des droits fondamentaux de notre Constitution, je requière que le Conseil d’ETAT organise un débat public télévisé entre Claude ROUILLER et Me Rudolf SCHALLER avec les témoins qui ont signé la demande d’enquête parlementaire pour briser cette loi du SILENCE"

Cesla AMARELLE hold now all the cards to restore the confidence of the citizens in the Authorities!

To request from the former federal judge, Claude ROUILLER, to explain, in a contradictory public debate, the content of its expertise which denies the dysfunctions of the system already established with Me of ROUGEMONT, another expert of the law, is a simple and effective measure. It would be unacceptable that the State of VAUD pays huge amounts of money to this expert whose integrity was questioned for very serious reasons!

051217DP_GC

180321_24H

180403DE_CA

28.03.18 AFTER THE "NO BILLAGS" INITIATIVE REJECTION  GILLES MARCHAND CAN GET CLOSER TO THE PEOPLE BY SPREADING THE INFORMATION ON TRICKS USED BY CORRUPTED ELITES TO CHEAT

Gilles MARCHAND
Gilles MARCHAND
Director of the RTS

Gilles MARCHAND is informed about one of the tricks that the Courts with the brotherhoods of lawyers set up to allow a President administrator of company, lawyer, to commit crimes with complete impunity by violating in a grime way the fundamental rights of the other citizens:

This is the authorization, which a President of the bar has to give, as precondition to be able to lodge a complaint against a President administrator of company, lawyer :

See part: 180328DE_GM

AFTER THE PEOPLE ASSURED HIM AN INDEPENDENT FINANCING TO DEFEND THE SWISS VALUES, THE RTS WANTS TO MAKE THE DIFFERENCE AND TO GET CLOSER TO THE PEOPLE. THEN, LET US TAKE ADVANTAGE TO CONGRATULATE THE NATIONAL COUNCILLORS WHO WANT NO MORE ELITES CORRUPTED AT THE HEAD OF THE SERVICES OF THE STATE AND WHO WANT TO MAKE PUNISH THOSE WHO COMMIT OFFENCES.
LET US ASK FOR A TELEVISION PROGRAM WHICH PRESENTS THE TRICKS OF THE CORRUPT ELITES WHICH CHEAT AND LET US MAKE PUNISH THE AUTHORS

For the first broadcast, we suggest informing the people about the crimes that can commit with complete impunity Presidents administrators of company, lawyers, thanks to the hidden relations which bind lawyers to the Courts, with tricks which make shiver :

Do you know that?

« To lodge a penal complaint against a President administrator of company, lawyer, is needed an authorization of the President of the bar, while to lodge a penal complaint against a President administrator of company, who is not lawyer, is not needed an authorization of the President of the bar »

Do you know that?

The President of the bar can wait several months before giving his answer and he can refuse to give the authorization 

This authorization request is a part of a customary law (= trick) that the people cannot know but which is applied well and truly by professionnals of the law. It is a hidden door in the judicial system which has set up the professionnals of the law who drafted the codes to be able to rob citizens with complete impunity.

One of the specialists who uses this critical vulnerability of the judicial system is Dr Adrian URWYLER. He has just made a demonstration at the federal Court, how with this trick, criminals can cheat and escape from the justice, at the condition that he help them by committing denials of justice. To commit denials of justice with a code of procedure which is not applicable, he turned out to be a real Maestro, to see part 180311DE_TF

The President of the Federal Court, Ulrich Meyer was informed about trick used by this Maestro to cheat :

See part : 180327DE_TF.

The case is now in the hand of the federal Assembly, but a television debate would avoid to the citizens, who cannot know these tricks, to be despoiled by professionals of the law, as for example Dr Adrian URWYLER who cheats with a code of procedure which he knows that it is not applicable!

180328DE_GM

180311DE_TF

180327DE_TF

21.03.18 IN A BROADCASTED PARLIAMENT DEBATE, NATIONAL COUNCILLORS BREAK THE OMERTA ON THE EXISTENCE OF CORRUPT ELITES WHO MANAGE DISLOYALLY PUBLIC SERVICES.

Regula RYTZ
Regula RYTZ
National Councillor

Above, the National Councillor Regulated RYTZ breaking the OMERTA on the corruption which reigns in the management of a public service as CarPostal.

Quote:
" With these alleged acts we rather have to do with corrupt elites of Third World countries rather than with Swiss Post office"

 

 

IN RESPONSE TO THIS REPORT OF THE EXISTENCE OF CORRUPT ELITES, A MESSAGE OF A RADICAL CHANGE IS GIVEN BY NATIONAL COUNCILLORS of WHOM THE COUNCILLOR HUGUES HILTPOLD :

Those who commit criminal offences with tricks to cheat - that is trickeries - do not have to remain any more unpunished and, this rule should be applied at all level !

 

To discover some extracts of this Parliament debate at the origin of this new paradigm, to see pages 3 and 4 of the following document :

180320DE_CN

 

 

THIS DEBATE IS THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF AN INDISPENSABLE CHANGE OF PARADIGM WITH THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES WHICH GIVE TOO MUCH POWER TO THE CORRUPT ELITES :

The deceit with procedural tricks should not allow anymore corrupt elites to commit economic crimes with complete impunity, measures should be taken so that their members, who commit criminal offences, are punished

 

A warm congratulations and one THANKS TO the National Councillors who want that the members of a corrupt elite at the head of public service do not enjoy any more the impunity for the violation of the rules of the good faith by using tricks to cheat and by-pass the respect of the Values of the Constitution.

 

 

SUMMARY OF THE INTERVENTIONS OF THE NATIONAL COUNCILLORS OF the DEBATE OF MARCH 14TH, 2018 AT THE PARLIAMENT :

The scandal which grips a public service as CarPostal is due to the members of a corrupt ruling elite which uses tricks to cheat. They know that these tricks would send them directly in jail, if they would work for the private sector, but they use them by knowing that they have no risk, because they work at the head of a public service, for which the control systems are failing.
See the intervention at pages 2 to 4 : 180320DE_CN

IT IS EXACTLY THE ANALYSIS WHICH HAD MADE ME DE ROUGEMONT FOR THE DYSFUNCTION OF the PUBLIC SERVICE OF THE "JUSTICE COUPLED WITH THE BAR ASSOCIATION" DESCRIBED IN THE DEMAND OF PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY AND FOR WHICH HE HAD PROPOSED TWO CURATIVE MEASURES:

a) To record all the audiences
b) To punish automatically those who violate the fundamental rights

See demand of parliament enquiry : 051217DP_GC

 

REMINDER OF SOME TRICKS USED TO CHEAT, EXPLAINED BY ME DE ROUGEMONT

1) One of the hidden tricks to the people put at disposal of a President of company, lawyer, to cheat
There are hidden relations which bind the Bar association to the Courts which requires that is needed an authorization of the President of the bar to lodge a complaint against a President of company, lawyer, while such an authorization is not needed to lodge a complaint against a President of company who is not lawyer. This requirement is hidden to the people.

In 1995, Me Foetisch, President of ICSA explained that he committed criminal offences because his Title of lawyer assured him the impunity. He used, among others, this trick of the authorization request hidden to the people to cheat, namely that he could not be the object of a criminal complaint without the authorization of the President of the bar and that he was assured that the President of the bar would refuse to give the authorization.

2) Tricks hidden to the people to cheat, put at disposal of the Presidents of Courts in the codes of procedures
Me De Rougemont had explained that :

The codes of procedures allow a judge to vitiate a judgment by ruling out the facts in favour of one of the parties without risking to be penalised.

The authors of the codes of procedures have planned no means of control to assure that a magistrate respects the fundamental rights in his decisions, among which the rules of the good faith.

By definition, the authors of code of procedures consider that a judge cannot be corrupted because he is sworn.

Me de Rougemont had confirmed :

The existence of the hiddenrelations to the people which bind the members of brotherhoods of lawyers to the Courts which allow them to commit economic crimes with complete impunity.

Me of ROUGEMONT had explained that a judge who commits a denial of justice knows that he will never be penalised. This principle with the hidden relations binding the bar association to the Courts allowed Me Foetisch with his colleagues to commit crimes with complete impunity. He qualified this critical dysfunction of the judiciary system as a deficiency of the application laws which do not give access to neutral and independent Courts.

When he learnt that Judge Bertrand Sauterel had asserted that a damage, estimated at more than 2 million for the violation of the copyright by judicial expertise, was only worth 4000 CHF, Me de ROUGEMONT could not explain it with the tricks put at disposal of the Courts to cheat. He wanted that judge SAUTEREL meets the public to explain such a judgment which violates in an incomprehensible way the rules of the good faith.

A QUESTION HAS RAISED WITH THE NEW PARADIGM AND THE RECOGNITION OF THE EXISTENCE OF CORRUPT ELITES:
Would the Judges, who assert respecting the fundamental rights as judge Bertrand SAUTEREL or judge Christine HABERMACHER, have been threatened in order that  Me De ROUGEMONT did not manage to explain how they can assert that a damage of 2 millions = a damage of 4000 CHFF

How come that the author of the code of procedure, Adrian URWYLER, did not take into account elements established with Me De ROUGEMONT to draft the code of procedure?

As underlined it the National Councillor Jean-Jacques MAIRE, it is now necessary to wonder about the motivations which push the members of an elite, as for example here magistrates, to commit ciminal offences among which of the denials of justice while they have to apply the article 35 in their decisionss !
Especially, it is necessary to take measures so that those who commit criminal offences as the denial of justice to grant advantages to a party must be automatically penalised and should not be allowed to get the prescription for their criminal offences,
See part : 180320DE_CE

051217DP_GC

180320DE_CN

180320DE_CE

14.03.18 THE CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF the JUDICIAL SYSTEM, WITH THE COVER PROVIDED BY THE ROUILLER REPORT GRANTED BY THE FEDERAL COURT TO Me FOETISCH FOR ITS CRIMES, JAMS THE FUNCTIONING OF THE FEDERAL COURT

Président du TF
Ulrich MEYER
President of the Federal Court

Ulrich Meyer cannot enforce any more the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution further to the judgment of the Federal Court which deprived Dr Erni to be represented by Me Schaller on the Rouilller Report.

See part 160819RS_TF

Me Foetisch and his colleagues finally managed to block the functioning of the Federal Court with the cover provided by the Rouiller Report granted by the Federal Court to Me Foetisch to cover up his economic crimes

Called at the bedside of the Federal Court, Dr Adrian URWYLER makes a masterful demonstration of the way the code of procedure, which he has drafted, allows to block the judicial system for the citizens who ask the respect of the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution, by forcing them to make excessive constitutional appeals.

See part : 180201TC_DE

.... but there will be no constitutional appeal.

See part : 180311DE_TF

This time the alert is given to the Committees of surveillance of the Federal Court :

See part : 180311DE_CN

 

A project of curative measure to restore the respect of the fundamental rights, among which the equality and the protection against the arbitrary power, the articles 8 and 9 of the federal Constitution, is proposed:

It is simply necessary to apply the principle of equality in front of the law for all and first and foremost for the Presidents of Courts:

“Since Presidents of Courts find normal to make dismiss citizens to protect members of brotherhoods, it is also necessary to make dismiss these Presidents of Courts by making them undergo the same damage as the one that they make undergo to the victims of crimes committed by lawyers with the cover, that the Federal Court grant to them "

See page 8 of part :180311DE_CE

IN SPITE OF THE CALL FOR HELP OF THE AUTHOR OF THE CODE OF PROCEDURE, Dr ADRIAN URWYLER, THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM JAMMED BY THE HIDDEN RELATIONS BINDING THE BAR ASSOCIATION TO THE COURTS DOES NOT ANY MORE MANAGE TO ENFORCE THE FUNDAMENTAL GUARANTEED RIGHTS BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION. A CURATIVE MEASURE BASED ON THE RESPECT OF THE EQUALITY IN FRONT OF THE LAW IS PROPOSED TO THE COMMITTEES OF SURVEILLANCE

Of the cover granted by the Federal Court and Professor Claude ROUILLER to Patrick Foetisch further to the hidden relations which bind the members of brotherhoods of lawyers to the Courts

In 1995, Claude ROUILLER is President of the Federal Court.
This year, Me Foetisch, as PRESIDENT of the executive board of ICSA Company commits 3 breaches : unfair management, swindle, and violation of the copyright to allow his friend Penel, manager of ICSA, to compete disloyally with Mr Erni. To do it, Me Foetisch declares that the contract of October 19th, 1994, which bound ICSA to Mr. Erni and which allowed him to have access to the know-how developed by Mr. Erni and protected by the copyright, was never valid. Then the President of ICSA announces that they are going to use the know-how and the product acquired with this contract in a illicit way, further to what he declared that the contract was never valid and that he does not want to return the product and knowhow benefits.

Of the cover granted by the Federal Court, of whom Claude ROUILLER is member, to the President of ICSA further to the hidden relations binding the bar association to the courts :
Me Foetisch explains to Mr. Erni that as lawyer he is protected at the highest level of the justice that means by the Federal Court, of whom the President is Claude ROUILLER, and that his breaches will never be investigate. He explains to Mr. Erni that if the latter dares to lodge a complaint, he will make him ruin and demolish by the Courts to must undergo unfair and abusive procedure until he gives up. He makes observe to Mr. Erni that he ruined him and that Mr. Erni does not have more than the choice to close his company immobilized by his breaches.

Of the bar association which confirms that the President of ICSA enjoys a protection cover of the judiciary system assuring him the impunity of his breaches (economical crimes)
Mr. Erni learns that he needs an authorization of the President of the Bar to lodge a complaint against the President of ICSA, because he is lawyer, while no authorization is needed to lodge a complaint against a President who is not lawyer. This authorization is refused.
Mr. Erni would never have signed a contract with the President of ICSA if he had known this occult right.
He is going to discover a whole series of hidden relations which allow Me Foetisch to commit crimes with complete impunity, as the latter announced it.

Of the confirmation by Me de ROUGEMONT of the existence of the hidden relations, which bind the Bar association to the Courts, which creates a breach in the cover granted by the Federal Court and Claude Rouiller, cited by Me Foetisch in 1995 to justify his crimes which would remain unpunished.

In 2007, further to a request of parliamentary inquiry, Me de ROUGEMONT confirms the existence of these hidden relations, binding lawyers to the Courts, which allow Me Foetisch to commit crimes with complete impunity.
He explains how Me Foetisch and his colleagues use these hidden relations binding them to the Courts to ruin their victims by forcing them to comply with unfair prescribed procedure.

He explains that the codes of procedures are not applicable, because they do not allow to take into account these hidden relations. That is how the Presidents of executive board of a Company, with a Title of lawyer, benefit of a cover of the Federal Court which assures them the impunity. He confirms that it does not belong to Mr Erni to have to undergo damage and to have to finance the judicial procedures with this lacking in the legislation which does not give access to neutral and independent Courts.

To seal the breach in the protection cover of Me Foetisch, made by the public revelations of Me de ROUGEMONT, the case is removed from him and transferred to Professor Claude ROUILLERR

Professor Claude ROUILLER drafts then a report which denies the established facts with Me de ROUGEMENT

The Federal Court violates then to Me Schaller the right guaranteed by the ECHR to represent Mr. Erni on the contents of this report of the former president of the Federal Court, while this report is disputed for its bad faith further to the revelations made by Me de ROUGEMONT. It is a censorship process which assures again the smooth running of the cover granted by the Federal Court and Claude ROUILLER to Me Foetisch to allow him to ruin the victims of his crimes to comply with unfair prescribed procedure.

See part 160520RS_TF then : 160819RS_TF

New curative measure proposed to the committees of surveillance of the judiciary system to end the cover provided by the Rouiller report granted by the Federal Court to Me Foetisch, which allows him to create damage by violating the fundamental rights of his victims with a code of not applicable and unfair prescribed procedures:

To apply the principle of the equality of the citizens, with the criterion of control :

" DO NOT DO TO OTHERS,WHAT YOU WOULD NOT WANT DONE TO YOU"

... and to charge to the magistrates the damage which they impose to the citizens to comply with unfair prescribed procedures violating the fundamental rights, and which they would not tolerate for themselves...

...with this measure, the critical vulnerability of the judiciary system, which allow Professional of the law to commit crimes with full impunity with the hidden relations would be then ended by applying the principe of equality guaranteed by the Constitution !

See curative measure page 8 : 180311DE_CE

We indicate that in 2002, the President of ICSA compromised all the judicial system by testifying on oath that the Contract of October 19th, 1994, which he had refused to honour to torpedo the company to Mr. Erni and compete with him disloyally, was the only valid contract !
It is the best given proof by the Professional of the law that the codes of procedures do not allow to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution, as had explained it Me de ROUGEMONT!

160819RS_TF

180201TC_DE

180311DE_TF

051217DP_GC

180311DE_CN

180311DE_CE

 

 

 

07.03.18 ME PATRICK FOETISCH BECOMES A DANGEROUS MOUNTAIN FOR THE FEDERAL COUNCIL AND THE MAGISTRATES, UNPUNISHED FOR THEIR DENIAL OF JUSTICE

Me Patrick FOETISCH
Me Patrick FOETISCH

1.- President of ICSA SA
2.- The MOUNTAIN of P. Penel
3.- The Hidden Lawyer of Penel
4.- Board of Directors Kudelski
5.- The favorite of Bar President
6.- The Brotherhoods Machiavelli

Jean TRECCANI was promoted substitute federal judge after having removed illicitly the private correspondences between the President of ICSA and the Mr. Penel which were under sequestration,...
..... but the photocopy of some parts before their disappearance left a dangerous track showing the hidden relations which assure him the impunity

The President of the Court Bertrand Sauterel was promoted State Judge for having asserted in his judgment that the damage for violation of the copyright was not upper to 4000 CHF while he knew that a judicial expertise had established it for more than 2 million. He made this act of abuse of authority to hide the professional blackmail with a false denunciation exercised by Me Foetisch and his colleagues against Mr Erni, further to what the latter had interrupted the prescription for the swindle and what he refused to remove it in exchange for a dismissal of the charges for the false denunciation, ...
..but a request of parliamentary inquiry filed by witnesses of the audience of judgment highlighted the act of abuse of authority
051217DP_GC

The Professor, Me Claude ROUILLER, promoted in the past federal Judge, made a false expertise to deny the established facts with the request of parliamentary inquiry. The hypocrisy of its expertise was not able to be established further to the violation made for Mr. Erni's lawyer to represent him. These facts were the object of a public conference in 2010 .....
... This act of unimaginable abuse of authority for the majority of the citizens led a dissident lawyer, to ask to consult all the file. He confirmed that Me Foetisch was a dangerous MOUNTAIN which could provoke at any time the death of a federal Councillor.....

We remind that at the origin of this case the President of the bar forbade that Me Foetisch can be the object of a criminal complaint.
961019DE_OP

Me Maire declared that the behavior of Me Foetisch was Machiavellian
970224JM_DE

The President of the Bar : Philippe Richard, Ives Burnand, Christian Bettex, Philippe Bauer,...., all showed that they did not hesitate to violate the Values of the Constitution to allow the President of ICSA being able to commit crimes with complete impunity.

SOCIETY 2.00: THE CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF the JUDICIAL SYSTEM CANNOT BE ANY MORE HIDDEN.

IN 2018, THE SOCIETY 2.0, WITH THE ACCESSIBLE DIGITAL DATA TO EVERYBODY, DOES NOT ALLOW ANY MORE THOSE WHO MAKE AN EXCESSIVE USE OF THEIR POWER TO MAKE IT SHIELDED FROM THE LIGHTS. FOR EXAMPLE, WIKILEAKS SHOWS THAT THE CENSORSHIP OF THE PRESS AND THE CRIMINALITY OF STATE CAN BE MADE PUBLIC; ANONYMOUS SHOWS THAT THE CITIZENS HAVE NEW WAYS TO UNMASK THE PROFESSIONALS OF THE JUSTICE WHO DO NOT WANT TO ENFORCE THE FUNDAMENTAL GUARANTEED RIGHTS BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION.

HIDDEN RELATIONS BINDING the BAR ASSOCIATION TO THE COURTS WHICH CAUSED MR. PENEL’S DEATH ACCORDING TO THE EXPLANATIONS OF THE DISSIDENT LAWYER

OF THE DEATH OF POISONED P. PENEL
In 2016, in the above given context, a dissident lawyer, which had recordings taken between magistrates and lawyers showing negotiations for hidden arrangements, which could concern Mr. Erni, asked to see all the file concerning the crimes committed by the President of ICSA.

He was very interested in Mr. Penel's death. Like it was mentioned below, to see comments on February 7th, 2018, he considered that:

"Pierre PENEL would have been murdered (poisoned) further to what the hidden relations which bind the Bar association to the Courts allowed Judge de Montmollin to remove of the file the contents of the mail of January 18th, 1996"

OF THE ILLICIT REMOVING THE SEQUESTRATION OF PRIVATE CORRESPONDENCES BETWEEN FOETISCH and PENEL BY THE JUDGE TRECCANI
In 2007, Me Paratte had testified on the illicit removing the sequestration of parts (among which there was private correspondences between Mr. Penel and Me Foetisch) who had been returned to Mr. Penel by Judge Treccani.
See part d506 (point 1). Unbelieving Me Nardin had asked for an investigation to the Prosecution which had confirmed the illicit removing the sequestration.

The dissident lawyer had told Mr. Erni that Me Nardin had done well to ask for an investigation on this illicit removing the sequestration.
Some private correspondences (between Foetisch and Penel) under sequestration had been able to be photocopied before their disappearance. The dissident lawyer had made a Kafka's, but very relevant analysis of the illicit removing the sequestration of these private correspondences, made by Judge Jean Treccani.

We quote here two of these parts with the comments that the dissident lawyer had made for Mr. ERNI:

"THE MOUNTAIN OF Mr. PENEL" see part 950707PP_PF
The dissident lawyer had said, in this mail: you see that Judge Treccani knew that the President of ICSA, Me Foetisch, who must respect the non-competition clause, had announced to Mr. PENEL that he had the power of a MOUNTAIN and that he would make you annihilate by the Courts by violating this clause.
Dans ce courrier: you see that Judge Treccani knew that the President of ICSA, Me Foetisch, worked against the interests of ICSA to allow his friend Penel to compete with you as well as the administrator Hennard in an unfair way.

"THE HIDDEN LAWYER OF Mr. PENEL" see part 950515PF_PP
'The dissident lawyer had said, in this mail: in this mail, you see that Judge Treccani knew that the President of ICSA, Me Foetisch, acted as Mr. Penel's lawyer, who set up his own business while the contract which binds him to ICSA did not allow him to do it. Me Foetisch, as President of the Board of ICSA, couldn’t be the lawyer of Penel to swindle ICSA. This was unfair management.

"OF THE TESTIMONY ON OATH OF ME FOETISCH IN 2002"
The dissident lawyer had also found the testimony of the President of ICSA made on oath in 2002, to see comments below of January 2nd, 2018.
He had pointed out that by testifying that it was the Contract of October 19th, 1994 which was the only applicable contract, Patrick Foetisch had de facto sentenced to death Pierre PENEL whose hidden lawyer or the "MOUNTAIN" he was. (If Pierre PENEL had not been murdered, he had documents to make condemn Me Foetisch who had betrayed him with his testimony on OATH)".

He had observed that Judge Jean Treccani knew that when there is criminal complaint for swindle, violation of the copyright and unfair management, he could not remove the sequestration and give back to Mr. Penel the private correspondences (between Penel and Foetisch) which would have allowed him to charge the President of ICSA, in order to be able to grant a dismissal of the charges to Me Foetisch. It asked for no comment, except that the ban made by the Bar Association that Me Foetisch can be the object of a criminal complaint had put down all the functioning of the judicial system.

The dissident lawyer had simply explained to Mr Erni that: he had to deal with a powerful criminal organization and that the words were of use to nothing more. The dissident lawyer had said that he knew who had poisoned Mr Penel, and he had found in the file elements that it would not have imagined.

Since this organization had made murder P. Penel and had asked Professor Claude ROUILLER, former President of the federal Court to make a false report to contradict the established facts with Me de ROUGEMONT by depriving Mr. Erni of the right to be represented by his lawyer, the dissident lawyer asserted that the federal Court would violate to Mr. Erni the right to be represented by his lawyer if  he would appeal to get it !
He has been proved right, but the dissident lawyer is also committed to make a surgical strike if he has been proved right.
Today, Me Foetisch also became a dangerous MOUNTAIN for the federal Council and the unpunished magistrates for their denial of justice which the SOCIETY 2.0 cannot hide anymore !

961019DE_OP

950707PP_PF

950515PF_PP

051217DP_GC

970224JM_DE

 

 

28.02.18 CALL UPON THE TRIPLE SKILL OF Me MAURICE ROPRAZ TO END THE VIOLATION OF OUR FRIBOURG CONSTITUTION BY PROFESSIONALS OF THE LAW

Par Chancellerie Fribourg
Me Maurice ROPRAZ

1.- Lawyer (Fribourg University)
2.- Member of Judicial Council
3.- Councillor of Fribourg State

As Lawyer, Me Ropraz knows well the hidden relations from the Public, binding lawyers to the Courts, used by Me Foetisch and his colleagues to commit crimes with complete impunity.

As Lawyer, member of the Judicial Council, Me Ropraz knows well the process of denials of justice applied by the judges, who are assured that their abuses of authority will never be punished, as they made them to allow the members of brotherhoods of lawyers to commit crimes with complete impunity. He knows that the magistrates are incited to commit denials of justice to be promoted in the judicial hierarchy, while they should be condemned to violate the fundamental rights.

As representative of the Council of State for the Judicial Council, Me Maurice Ropraz can end the violation of the fundamental rights by requiring on the legislative level that the Judges, who commit denials of justice, cannot be any more promoted, but on the contrary must be condemned in a exemplary way.

He  knows that the codes of procedures are used by Me Foetisch and his colleagues to by-pass the respect for the fundamental rights by going, as far as depriving a citizen of the right to be represented by his lawyer within the framework of crimes committed by professionals of the law.

He knows that the vulnerability of the judicial system is that the codes of procedures do not force the professionals of the law to respect the fundamental rights in their decision

Me Ropraz, as Member of the Council of State, acting as Lawyer for an Average customer, knows that he could not enforce the fundamental rights if he had been deprived by Me Bettex and the federal Court of the right to pronounce on the report ROUILLER. He knows that, if the federal Court or the authorities violate the right of his Average customer to be represented by him on the report ROUILLER, the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution are violated.

He knows that such a process is unbearable in a democratic state governed by the rule of law.

WITH HIS THREE SKILLS: (1) OF EXPERIENCED LAWYER, (2) OF MEMBER OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL  AND (3) OF MEMBER OF THE COUNCIL OF STATE, Me MAURICE ROPRAZ HAS THE POWER TO END  THE CRIMINALITY COMMITTED BY ME FOETISCH AND HIS COLLEAGUES WITH THE HIDDEN RELATIONS BINDING THEM TO THE COURTS BY CORRECTING THE LAWS Of APPLICATION WITH TWO MEASURES :
1) To delete the privileges of lawyers
2) To end the impunity of denial of justice

THE PRIVILEGES & HIDDEN RELATIONS (Correction 1)
As experienced lawyer, Me Maurice ROPRAZ, as Me De ROUGEMONT explained it, knows that the codes of procedures are not applicable in this context because they do not allow to take into account the hidden relations, binding the Bar association to the Courts, which allow the members of brotherhoods to commit crimes with complete impunity.

As showed it the Presidents of the bar: Me Philippe Richard, Me Philippe BAUER, Me Christian BETTEX, then Professor Claude ROUILLER and the dissident lawyer,…, Me Maurice ROPRAZ knows that these hidden relations are critical vulnerabilities of the judicial system, which are used by the professionals of the law to violate in grime way the respect of the fundamental rights of a whole part of the population.

Of the authorization requested to lodge a complaint against a President of company, lawyer
Me Ropraz knows that it is not necessary to have an authorization of the President of the Bar to lodge a complaint against a President administrator of company, who is not lawyer, while it is needed for lodging a complaint against a President administrator, who is lawyer. He knows that Me Foetisch and his colleagues use this hidden privilege from the public to commit their crimes in full impunity.

Of the false denunciation which cannot be contradicted
Me Ropraz knows that the Bar association with a false denunciation, which it is not possible to contradict further to the hidden relations which bind the Bar association to the Courts, can ruin the victim of a crime committed by their members by forcing her to do excessive procedure in front of Courts which are not independent, as gave evidence of it Me Bettex.

Of the professional blackmail with a false denunciation
Me Ropraz knows that there is a real criminal organization behind Me Foetisch and his colleagues who use the false denunciation to make some professional blackmail. Me Ropraz knows that these criminal acts are possible thanks to the fact that Prosecutors, as "Raphaël Bourquin", "Fabien Gasser" who have the duty to enforce the fundamental rights in their decision, don’t do it because the code of procedures are vitiated with the hidden relations which bind the Courts to the bar Association. He knows that these hidden relations allow the members of the brotherhoods of lawyers to prevent the investigation of crimes committed by their members by violating with complete impunity the fundamental rights of the victims with permanent denials of justice.

Of the pressures exercised on the lawyers of the victims
Me Ropraz knows that the Bar association, by means of the federal Court, can censor the lawyer of the victim of Me Foetisch crime by depriving the lawyer of the right to represent his customer (Example: case of the report ROUILLER).
He knows that if lawyers refuse to take a mandate for defending the victim against Me Foetisch and his colleagues, the Courts will constraint the victim to pay arbitrary fees to the lawyers who have refused to take the mandate. For example, President Meuwly made it.

As state Councillor, Me Ropraz knows that, to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution, he has the duty to make delete these hidden relations and these privileges which lawyers have.

DENIALS OF JUSTICE CHARACTERIZED (Correction 2)
OF THE IMPUNITY OF THE DENIALS OF JUSTICE WHICH IS A SCANDAL ACCORDING TO ME De ROUGEMONT AND SEVERAL LAWYERS

As experienced lawyer, Me Maurice ROPRAZ, as Me De ROUGEMONT explained it, knows that it is incomprehensible that Judge Sauterel can argue that a damage estimated at more than 2 millions CHF with a judicial expertise was worth of only 4000 CHF.
He knows that it would not be possible if judges - who make denials of justice - were condemned and were deprived of any promotion.

He knows that today the system of evaluation of the prosecutors and the judges does not take into account the respect of the fundamental rights, but the number of handled files.
Me Ropraz knows that it is the critical vulnerability of the judicial system that a judge who commits a denial of justice, by not respecting the fundamental rights in his decisions, is not automatically accused of violation of the fundamental rights, but on the contrary is often rewarded by a promotion in the judicial hierarchy.

As noticed it Me De ROUGEMONT, Me Ropraz knows that it does not belong to the victims of denial of justice to have to finance of the procedure to enforce their fundamental rights, but it is the DUTY of the state to force the judges to enforce the fundamental rights in their decisions and to condemn those who violate the fundamental rights with codes of the procedures vitiated on purpose

With his three skills, Me Maurice ROPRAZ can end this critical vulnerability of the judicial system, see request below :

180225DE_CM

180225DE_OP

180225DE_CM

21.02.18 ME CHRISTIAN BETTEX MAKES THE FEDERAL JUDGES JUGGLE TO HIDE THE CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM USED BY HIS BROTHERHOOD TO COMMIT ECONOMIC CRIMES WITH COMPLETE IMPUNITY

Me Claude ROUILLERProfessor Claude ROUILLER,
President of the federal Court
in 1995

In 2007, during the handling of a request of parliamentary inquiry, Me de ROUGEMONT had revealed that the codes of procedures were not applicable to judge the economic crimes committed by members of brotherhoods of lawyers, because they did not allow to take into account the hidden relations which bind the Bar association to the Courts, it is:

"a critical vulnerability of the judicial system"

In this context, he could not explain the behavior of the President of the Court Bertrand SAUTEREL, who put in his judgment that the damage estimated at more than 2 millions by judicial expertise for a violation of the copyright, were only of 4000 CHF. Me de ROUGEMONT had made a commitment to organize an interview between the judge and the authors of the parliamentary inquiry so that he answers directly their questions. Big surprise:

" Me de ROUGEMONT was then forbidden to organize the interview and he would have been  removed from the case"

Members of the Big Council (most probably freemasons) asked to Professor Claude ROUILLER, one of the former Presidents OF THE FEDERAL COURT, to resume the file. This professor, a  kind of legend of the judicial system, asserted in his report the opposite of the elements established with Me de ROUGEMONT.

The contents of the report of Me Claude ROUILLER having been disputed by Me Rudolf Schaller, Me Christian BETTEX asked to the "colleagues of the federal Court" of this former President of the federal Court to censor Me Rudolf SCHALLER.

(In each to consult the documents to verify that this story is not the one of a horror movie, but a reality due to the fact that the codes of procedures do not allow enforcing the fundamental rights in this given context)

HOW CAN THE FEDERAL COURT REMAIN CREDIBLE AND ENFORCE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IF IT VIOLATES THE RIGHT OF ME SCHALLER TO PRONOUNCE ON THE REPORT OF Me CLAUDE ROUILLER, THE FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL COURT, "BY APPLYING, IN FULL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FACTS,  CODES OF PROCEDURES WHICH ARE NOT APPLICABLE", ACCORDING TO Me de ROUGEMONT?

On the hidden relations binding Me Foetisch to the Courts
In 1995, the Chairman of the board of the Company ICSA, Me Foetisch, violates the copyright and torpedos the company of Mr Erni to compete with him disloyally.
Me FOETISCH justifies it in calling upon its Title of lawyer and the hidden relations which bind his brotherhood to the Courts, which allow him to commit economic crimes with complete impunity.
The bar association confirms the existence of the hidden relations, by forbidding that a criminal complaint can be lodged against Me Foetisch. The damages caused by this violation of the copyright, committed with full impunity with the use of this critical vulnerability of the judicial system, are going to be estimated at more than 2 millions. It is only the beginning.

On the professional blackmail to force Mr Erni to give up his rights
Mr.  Erni interrupts the prescription.
He is then falsely accused by accomplices of Me Foetisch, among whom are members of the order of lawyers. They make him some professional blackmail to dismiss him by intriguing with his employer to force him to remove his interruption of prescription. There is a witness, who can prove the false accusation.

On the inequitable judgment of Judge Bertrand SAUTEREL, further to Mr. Erni's refusal to give in to the blackmail
Mr. Erni refuses to give in to the professional blackmail. He requires the testimony of the unique witness of the false accusation which can prove the falsity of the accusation.
The Judge Bertrand SAUTEREL says that he cannot make testify the unique witness, because this witness was forbidden by Me Christian BETTEX, vice-President of the bar, to testify.
Knowing that no Court can make testify this witness forbidden to testify by the Bar association, the judge Bertrand Sauterel asserts in his judgment that the damage was only 4000 CHF, while he knew that it was estimated  at more than 2 millions by judicial expertise.
This trick is used to persuade that the interruption of prescription was unjustified.

On the Codes of procedures which are not applicable in this given context
In 2007, Me de ROUGEMONT, appointed by the Big Council, explains that the codes of procedures are not applicable, because they cannot take into account the hidden relations which bind the bar association to the Courts. He explains that it is this principle which uses Me Foetisch and his colleagues to commit economic crimes with complete impunity. They force their victims to defend themselves with codes of procedures which are not applicable and inequitable.

On the the heavy artillery organized with a former President of the federal Court to counter the  facts established with Me de  ROUGEMONT
Me de ROUGEMONT would have been removed from the file. The latter is confided to one of a kind of legend of the justice, who is the former President of the federal Court: Professor Claude ROUILLER.
Me Claude ROUILLER drafts a report where he denies the established facts with Me de ROUGEMONT.
Me Schaller disputes the contents of the report, but his right to be able to represent Mr. Erni is violated, while he was officially appointed by Mr. Erni to represent him. This violation to be heard lasts for 8 years.

On the critical vulnerability of the judicial system, used by the federal Court to cover the organized crime
In 2016, during mediation, Me Bettex, who prevented the unique witness of the false accusation from testifying, confirms to Mr. Erni that it is impossible to contradict this false accusation in this given context. In front of Me Schaller, who maintains that Mr. Erni's fundamental rights have been violated, acting with its Title of lawyer of the State, Me BETTEX makes apply by the federal Court these codes of procedures which are not applicable, according to the elements established with Me de ROUGEMONT, to deprive Me Schaller to be able to pronounce on this report of Professor Claude ROUILLER, a kind of legend of the justice.

See part 180218DE_JS

 

(A dissident lawyer summarized these 21 years of unfair procedures made with these codes of procedures which are not applicable by saying that Switzerland needs a Maurice BAVAUD)

051217DP_GC

180218DE_JS

14.02.18 THE DEFICIENCIES OF THE JUSTICE ARE NOT ANYMORE A TABOO SUBJECT!
IT IS A REAL CHANGE OF PARADIGM INTRODUCED BY OUR NEW PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL ASSEMBLY

Président Parlement Dominique de BUMAN,
President of the Parliament

(See comments below at the date of January 9th, 2018)

SINCE THE BEGINNING OF HIS TERM AS CHAIRMAN OF THE FEDERAL ASSEMBLY, Mr DOMINIQUE DE BUMAN HAS REFOCUSED THE PARLIAMENT ON THE RESPECT OF THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION. IT IS A REAL CHANGE OF PARADIGM COMPARED WITH ITS PREDECESSORS.

Thanks to him, for the first time, the deficiencies of the justice are not anymore a TABOO subject.

The Management Committees of The Parliament have just been informed about a critical vulnerability of the judicial system which allows the Professionals of the law to abuse of their power and to violate in a grimeway the fundamental rights of a part of the population!

With the new rule:

" The Zero Tolerance becomes the Standard at Parliament" :

THE HIDDEN RELATIONS WHICH BIND LAWYERS, MEMBERS OF BROTHERHOODS, TO THE COURTS, USED BY LAWYERS TO COMMIT CRIMES WITH COMPLETE IMPUNITY, ARE NOT ANY MORE HIDDEN TO THE MEMBERS OF THE SUPERVISORY COMMISSIONS OF the PARLIAMENT

Management Committee of the Council of the States, to read:
Part : 180129DE_CE and part: 180212DE_CE

Management Committee of the National Council, to read :
Part : 180129DE_CN and part: 180212DE_CN

On this day of St Valentine's Day, it is a beautiful present for the lovers of the respect for the Values of the Constitution

180129DE_CE

180212DE_CE

180129DE_CN

180212DE_CN

07.02.18 INVESTIGATION ON THE  MURDER OF PIERRE PENEL : THE TRUE MOTIVE FOR  THE MURDER  WOULD BE THE DYSFUNCTION OF THE CODES OF PROCEDURES, DEMONSTRATED BY Me FOETISCH, AS CONFIRMS IT AN EXPERT OF the DOMAIN
Adrian URWYLER
Dr ADRIAN URWYLER
This President of the judiciary council and President of the  Fribourg state Court is one of the authors of the codes of procedures which allow to explain Pierre PENEL's murder.

Click here fore more info

Informed that the code of procedure is not applicable further to the elements established with Me  de ROUGEMONT, Dr Adrian Urwyler, with a breathtaking self-assurance, shows how the code of procedure allows to by-pass the respect of the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution.

See part 180204DE_AU

The Newspaper the HEBDO had sound the alarm on the dysfunction of the codes of procedures, Dr Adrian Urwyler, one of the authors of the codes, confirmed it !
See part:
160407_HEBDO

THE EXPLANATION OF the DYSFUNCTION OF OUR CODES OF PROCEDURES GIVEN BY OUR HARVEY  WEINSTEIN, THE NATIONAL COUNCILLOR, PHILIPPE BAUER, AS FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE BAR
On March 31st, 2010, Philippe BAUER obtained that the federal Court breaks the judgment of Neuchâtel of February 3rd, 2009, jugement_NE, which would have allowed to end the crimes committed by the members of brotherhoods with the hidden relations which bind them to the Courts. .
The President of the bar, Philippe BAUER, wanted that the federal Court admits that, if Me BETTEX had forbidden a member of their brotherhood - unique witness of a false accusation - to testify,  it was this witness who must take the risk of violating  the ban to testify  with the risk of being excluded from the Brotherhood for this disobeying orders. Everybody must know that Me de ROUGEMONT had explained in 2006 that no member of Brotherhood could take this economic risk to be excluded from the Brotherhood.
In summary, the President of the Bar, Philippe BAUER, wanted to put the private interest of its brotherhood ahead of those of our Nation by violating in a grime way the fundamental rights with the hidden relations binding his Brotherhood to the federal Court.

THE FEDERAL COURT APPLYING THE CODE OF PROCEDURE, VITIATED  WITH THE HIDDEN RELATIONS, AGREED WITH HIM.
AT THE PAGE 10 OF HIS JUDGMENT, THE FEDERAL COURT CONFIRMED THAT IT IS THE MEMBER OF THE BROTHERHOOD WHO MUST TAKE THE ECONOMIC RISK TO VIOLATE THE BAN TO TESTIFY MADE BY THE BROTHERHOOD IN ORDER TO RESPECT THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT GUARANTEED BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF THE FALSE ACCUSED WITH A FALSE DENUNCIATION MADE BY MEMBERS OF THE BROTHERHOOD.

In short, the National Councillor, Me Philippe BAUER, had demonstrated masterfully that the codes of procedures do not yet have any measure for the control of the constitutional fundamental rights respect, because, in contrary, procedures are de facto drafted to allow the members of brotherhoods to commit crimes with complete impunity.

The federal Court, by this judgment, confirmed that the power of Presiding judges is reduced by the Bar association. The latter can force them to violate the fundamental rights of the citizens by depriving them of the right to be able to make testify the unique witness of a false accusation made by members of the Bar association.

ACCORDING TO A DISSIDENT LAWYER, PIERRE PENEL WOULD HAVE BEEN MURDERED FURTHER TO WHAT THE HIDDEN RELATIONS, WHICH BIND the BAR ASSOCIATION TO THE COURTS, ALLOWED THE JUDGE de MONTMOLLIN TO REMOVE OF THE FILE THE CONTENTS OF THE MAIL OF JANUARY 18TH, 1996. THIS TIME, IT IS ONE OF AUTHORS OF THE CODE, Dr Adrian URWYLER, WHO CONFIRMS THAT THE CODES OF PROCEDURES ALLOW THE PROFESSIONALS OF THE LAW TO VIOLATE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE CITIZENS BY MAKING THEM DOING UNFAIR PROCEDURE, AS HAD ANNOUNCED  IT IN 1995 ME FOETISCH AND AS HAS DEMONSTRATED  IT Me PHILIPPE BAUER !

FUNCTION OF THE CODES OF PROCEDURES:
THE CODES OF PROCEDURES AIM AT ENFORCING THE SUPERIOR RIGHTS, WHICH ARE THE FUNDAMENTAL GUARANTEED RIGHTS BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION

HIDDEN RELATIONS VITIATING THE CODES OF PROCEDURES
EN 1995, ME FOETISCH, PRESIDENT OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD OF ICSA COMPANY, LAWYER, MEMBER OF A BROTHERHOOD, ANNOUNCED THAT HIS TITLE OF LAWYER, WITH THE RELATIONS BINDING HIM WITH HIS BROTHERHOOD TO THE COURTS, ALLOWED HIM TO COMMIT CRIMES WITH COMPLETE IMPUNITY.
IN 2005, ME de ROUGEMONT CONFIRMED THE EXISTENCE OF THESE HIDDEN RELATIONS WHICH THE PUBLIC CANNOT KNOW.

THE DEMONSTRATION OF ME FOETISCH WHICH PROVOKED THE MURDER OF PIERRE PENEL
In 1995, Me Foetisch, PRESIDENT of the executive board of ICSA Company commits 3 breaches, unfair management, swindle, and violation of the copyright to allow his friend Penel, manager of ICSA, to compete disloyally with Mr Erni.
At the time, when the codes of procedures must be applied to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution, the professionals of the law teach to Mr Erni that is needed an authorization of the President of the Bar to lodge a complaint against the President of the executive board of ICSA, because he is lawyer. This authorization will be refused.
In 2002, Me Foetisch, who must testify on oath, will compromise with his testimony all the judicial system by saying that the contract, which he disputed in 1995 to swindle Mr Erni, was valid. A little time after Mr Penel dies suddenly. According to a dissident lawyer, Mr Penel, become too annoying, was murdered by poisoning.
In 2006,5 minutes are necessary to Me de ROUGEMONT, to read the contract and notice breaches.
Me de ROUGEMONT declares that Me Foetisch should have been charged in 1995, ....
.... But he also confirms the existence of these hidden relations binding the Bar association to the Courts which do that the code of procedure is not applicable. He explains how the Bar association use them to allow their members to commit crimes with complete impunity. Facts confirmed in 2016 by Me Christian BETTEX.

PUBLIC QUESTIONS TO THE Dr ADRIAN URWYLER, ONE OF THE AUTHORS OF THE CODES OF PROCEDURES
Sir, Dr Adrian Urwyler, you have just shown how the code of procedure, of which you are one of authors, allows to by-pass the respect of the fundamental rights in this given context : 180204DE_AU

If we resume the demonstration made by the National Councillor, Me Philippe BAUER, namely that the codes of procedures do not yet have any measure for the control of the constitutional fundamental rights respect, because, in contrary, they are de facto drafted to allow the members of the brotherhoods to commit crimes with complete impunity:

1) Does it correspond to your Values?

2) Why did not you plan that the code of procedure forces the judges to verify that their decision respects the fundamental rights, because it is the first purpose of the codes of procedures?

3) How you can support that your code of procedure allowed Me Philippe BAUER to obtain that the federal Court breaks the judgment of Neuchâtel with the motivation that:
When a Court cannot make testify the unique witness of a false denunciation because it is forbidden to testify by the President of the Bar, it is the role of the  witness forbidden to testify by the brotherhood, to take the risk of undergoing an economic damage which is not bearable according to Me de ROUGEMONT, by violating the ban to testify made by the President of the BAR, to assure the respect for the fundamental rights of the accused citizen falsely accused?

4) How this economic risk for the witness forbidden to testify can be ignored by your code of procedure, when a false denunciation is made by members of the brotherhood for allowing a President of the Court, as Bertrand SAUTEREL, to assert that the violation of the copyright caused only a damage of 4000 CHF, while he knows that the judicial expertise calculated it for more than 2 million? How your code of procedure can allow such an act of abuse of authority which was inconceivable for Me de Rougemont?

5) How can your code of procedure assure the respect of the fundamental rights if a judge can remove the contents of the mail of January 18th, 1996, see comments at date 24.01.18 below?

6) What would you answer instead of Me Schaller to the questions asked in the document below?
180119DE_RS

7) How is it possible that your code of procedure allows to Me Christian BETTEX to be in the same case : President of the Bar, the lawyer of the State, the lawyer of the Parliament and to act as he made it?
How does your code of procedure allow to respect the fundamental rights by allowing that Judge Habermacher retrieve from the file, the document which describes this intervention of the former President of the Bar, Me Christian BETTEX, at all levels?, see part 170405DE_TA

8) How it is possible that your code of procedure allows two judges Mr CHAPUIS and Mr BRIAND to judge an case, where nobody knows them. We do not even know if they exist. They are maybe only virtual! See parts :
180119DE_BC
180119DE_CB

By knowing that only 5 minutes were necessary for Me de ROUGEMONT to read the contract and to declare that Me Foetisch should have been charged in 1995, by knowing that Me de Rougemont couldn't explain the behavior of Judge Treccani and Judge Sauterel, see comments below on January 31st, 2018, how do you explain that your code of procedure allows one such violation of the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution during 23 years of procedure?

How come that your code of procedure allows that a Court sends a file with ban to photocopy it, see below, comments at the date of 31.01.2018 ?

How come that your code of procedure can prevent Presiding judge from making  testify the unique witness of a false accusation made by members of the Bar association? Etc. …,it lasts for 23 years !

EACH OF US HAS TO APPRECIATE THAT YOUR CODE OF PROCEDURE HAS A SINGLE DEFECT, HE DOES NOT ALLOW TO ENFORCE THE FUNDAMENTAL GUARANTEED RIGHTS BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION, WHILE IT MUST BE ITS MAIN FUNCTION !

180204DE_AU

jugement_NE

180119DE_RS

180119DE_BC

180119DE_CB

170405DE_TA

31.01.18 PROJECT OF A NEW CHAIR IN LAW ON THE HIDDEN RELATIONS BINDING LAWYERS TO THE COURTS
Jean Treccani
JEAN TRECCANI,
This former substitute federal judge is one of the biggest experts of the domain of the hidden relations binding the lawyers to Courts.

He could explain that there is not only the contents kept in the dark of the Letter dated  January 18th, 1996, which shows the functioning of the hidden relations, highlighted further to what the judge de Montmollin had not planned that Mr Erni would write him a Letter by short-circuiting his lawyer. (See below comments at the date of January 24 th, 2018)

He could explain for example, how the contents kept in the dark of the secret questioning of July 15th, 1999 of Adel Michael shows the functioning of the hidden relations, highlighted further to what himself, as investigating judge, had not planned that Mr Erni comes to consult the file in the Court without his lawyer announced the surprised visit of Mr Erni.

We remind that Me de Rougemont explained that the code of procedures does not allow to take into account these hidden relations which allow the members of brotherhoods to commit crimes with complete impunity.
See part 171210DE_GB

With this project of a Chair in Law of the hidden relations, we expose here, for Judge Grégoire BOVET, this case of the secret questioning of July 15th, 1999, of Adel Michael. How, Judge Bovet could be appointed Professor for this new Chair in law of the hidden relations binding lawyers, members of brotherhoods, to the Courts, he will can certainly give an instructive lesson in law justifying the way taken by judge Jean Treccani, former substitute federal Judge, to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution by applying a code of procedure vitiated with the hidden relations !
180119DE_GB

If the criminal justice did not have its power reduced by the hidden relations which bind the national Councillor Philippe BAUER and his colleagues to the Federal Court, it is the choice of each citizen to assess that Prosecutor Fabien GASSER would not have violated the obligation to denounce!
(See below comments at the date January 17th 2018)

THE LETTER OF JANUARY 18TH, 1996, KEPT IN THE DARK BY THE JUDGE DE MONTMOLLIN, WHO WOULD ALLOW TO EXPLAIN THE MURDER OF PIERRE PENEL, WAKES MISSED VOCATIONS.
The Judge Grégoire BOVET, fascinated by this case, began giving lessons in law. His first lesson in law was,
(see part 171231DE_GB ), citation :
"To ask for the creation of an ad hoc Court not established by the law for the need of the case"

The Judge Virginie SONNEY could have the vocation to defend the members of the criminal organization which enriches Me Foetisch by violating in a way grime the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution. (See part 180119DE_VS)

THE SECRET QUESTIONING, OF JULY 15TH, 1999, OF ADEL MICHAEL BY THE JUDGE TRECCANI, SHOULD FASCINATE THE FUTURE PROFESSOR OF THE CHAIR IN LAW OF THE HIDDEN RELATIONS. IN ANY CASE IT DID NOT LEAVE INDIFFERENT THE DISSIDENT LAWYER, FOR DETAILS SEE BELOW:
Chronological facts (1995....)
1) The President of ICSA, Me Foetisch, with his accomplices 4M (Adel Michael) violate the copyright.
2) The Bar association forbids that a criminal complaint can be lodge against Me Foetisch, it could be lodged only against 4M.
See part 950822PR_OB
3) In August 15th, 1995, Mr Erni makes to judge Treccani, with a portable reader, a demonstration of the digital application stolen and copied illicitly by Me Foetisch. The Judge has the formal proof that the application specifications has been ordered with the contract of October 19th, 1994. The Judge knows that the copyright was violated by Me Foetisch who declared that contract of October 19th, 1994, binding its company to Mr Erni, has never been valid.
4) Mr Erni's lawyer cannot obtain, that the judge Treccani questionned 4M (Adel Michael), accused of violation of the copyright, so he cannot obtain that the accused produces the contract which he used to violate the copyright. Nevertheless, the judge Treccani, who does not want to question Adel Michael, knows that the contract is a false one further to the demonstration of the digital application which made to him Mr Erni.
5) In 2000, the Judge Treccani pronounced the dismissal of the charges for Me Foetisch and 4M, without having never questionned the accused of 4M according to Mr Erni's Lawyers. The dismissal of the charges was granted with benefit of the doubt further to that nobody could see the contract handed by Me Foetisch to 4M for violating the copyright. This procedure, used by the judge to dismiss the charges, has scandalized the public who attended the conference on this business case of the MBA-HEC in 2010. Nobody could understand that 4M (Adel Michael) did not have to show the contract received from Me Foetisch which, according to them, allowed them to reproduce the digital application.
See part 101208HEC

Chronological facts after the dismissal of the charges (2000)
1) Mr Erni pays a visit not announced to the Court, he discovers in the  trial file that Judge Treccani has questionned  in secret 4M (Adel Michael), on July 15th, 1999. He notes that Judge Treccani knew the contract which Me Foetisch handed to 4M, and he had the formal proof that Me Foetisch and 4M had violated the copyright.
2) Mr Erni interrupts the prescription further to this inconceivable discovery. His family will then be the object of pressure.
3) Mr Erni appoints another lawyer to obtain a certified true copy of the file. In the file sent by the Court, the Minutes of the secret questioning of 4M does not exist. Mr Erni will then be the object of outrageous professional blackmail.
4) Mr Erni appoints a new lawyer, Me Paratte. The latter discovers that there is a track in one of the operation Minutes of the file, which indicates that on July 15th 1999, 4M have been questioned. So the proof was brought that Judge Treccani questionned in secret the accused 4M!
5) Me Paratte requires again from the Court to get the original file.
6) The Court send the original file to the office of the Court of Neuchâtel with ban to allow Me Paratte doing copy of the file.
7) Me Paratte discovers that Mr Erni was right: the Minutes of the questioning dated July 15th 1999 existed in this original file and proved the violation of the copyright. But he was only the eyewitness of the existence of these Minutes, because he were forbidden by the Court to photocopy them. d506

To underline that in civil procedure, in 2002, Me Foetisch heard as witness, on oath, has confirmed that the contract of October 19th, 1994, was valid and was the contract which was linking his company to Mr Erni, while he had violated this contract in 1995 to compete unfairly against Mr Erni with an Italian company and to torpedo the company of Mr Erni with the hidden relations which bound him to the Courts.

Question to Mr Grégoire BOVET : After your two lessons in law, Sir, the future Professor of the Chair of the hidden relations: 180119DE_GB
1) Do you consider that Jean TRECCANI respected the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution in his decisions?
2) Do you agree with Me de Rougemont who says that the code of procedures is not applicable because the Courts have their power reduced by the hidden relations which bind them to the brotherhoods of lawyers?
3) Did Me Philippe BAUER respect the fundamental rights by calling upon the hidden relations who binds him to the federal Court to hand down the Neuchâtel judgment which restored the equality in front of the law? See comments below under date of December 20th, 2017, and of January 2nd, 2018?

171210DE_GB

180119DE_GB

180119DE_VS

950822PR_OB

101208HEC

24.01.18 THE PIERRE PENEL STIFF HAUNTS THE SWISS PARLIAMENT :

Mr Penel would have been murdered with the hidden relations which bind Me Philippe BAUER and his colleagues to the Courts !

Cadavre de P. Penel

Two vaudois Judges, Bernard CHAPUIS and Cédric BRIAND, were instructed to explain to the Parliament vaudois the procedures which they used "to respect" the article 35 of the federal Constitution with a state of the facts that they knew to be incomplete and misleading.
180119DE_BC
180119DE_CB

(Let us hope that they will have the honesty of Yannick BUTTET which resigned when he realized that he had had a disrespectful behaviour of the Values of the Constitution. Their answer will be published on this site.)

If the criminal justice had not its power reduced by the hidden relations which bind the National Councillor Philippe BAUER and his colleagues to the Federal Court, Pierre PENEL would not have been murdered and Prosecutor Fabien GASSER would not have violated the obligation to denounce !

IN APRIL, 2016, THE DISSIDENT LAWYER ASSERTED THAT THE LETTER OF JANUARY 18TH, 1996, REMOVED FROM THE FILE BY THE JUDGE de MONTMOLLIN, ALLOWED TO EXPLAIN THE MURDER OF PIERRE PENEL.

This letter of January 18th, 1996 has again been kept in the dark, apart from the file, in 2017 by Judge Christine HABERMACHER, to be able to deliver an inequitable judgment.
180119DE_RS

We underline that the existence of this letter, received on January 19th, 1996, by the judge de Montmollin and returned on January 23rd, 1996, couldn’t be erased from the list of the Minutes of the trial, as page 8 from file 153 of the Minutes gives evidence of it, see part quoted below.
0990607TC_DE

The dissident lawyer, who is the lawyer of the GER, (see below the date of 21.10.2016) asserted that Mr. Penel died poisoned. He is one of the 3 lawyers, who had knowledge of the contents of this letter of January 18th, 1996, which they consider to be as a time bomb.
He explained to Mr Erni that this letter of January 18th, 1996, that he discovered in April, 2016, had an impact which Mr Erni could not imagine when he wrote it. For the curious, see his explanations in the first and second paragraph of the page 14 and see the question G on the page 16 of the following document:
180119DE_RS

According to the dissident lawyer Mr Penel would have been murdered: because in 1996, Mr Erni lost the provisional measures further to what a lawyer, colleague of Me Foetisch, ordered to Judge de Montmollin to persuade in his judgment that Mr Erni was not competitive, while he did not have to prove it.
The lawyer made introduce by the judge a false price into his judgment, while the judge knew the real price which appeared in the contract and while he knew that this contractual price had been confirmed by the testimony of the signatory of the contract. The false price which the judge had to introduce in his judgment, to persuade that Mr Erni was not competitive, was more than the double of the contractual price. The judge introduced this false price in the judgment by asserting that it had been given by a witness, while he knew that this witness has never existed.
The judge did not plan that Mr Erni was going to point out it to him by a letter dated January 18th, 1996....
When the damage was estimated at more than two millions CHF, Mr Penel, who knew this agreement made between the colleague of Me Foetisch and the judge de Montmollin, would then have become a risk for the Bar association. He would then have died poisoned, and the lawyer of the GER would know his murderer.
The Bar association then made a false denunciation, which cannot be denied,  to persuade that Mr Erni had undergone only a damage of 4000 CHF by preventing the Judge from making testify  the unique witness of this false accusation.
The neuchâteloise justice having blamed the Bar association to have prevented the judge from making testify the witness, Me Philippe BAUER then called upon the privileges of the members of the Bar association which bind them to the Courts to hand down this judgment by the federal Court ... The privileges of the Bar association were considered more important than the respect for the guaranteed fundamental rights by the Constitutionn.

180119DE_RS

180119DE_BC

180119DE_CB

0990607TC_DE

17.01.18 CRIMINAL COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE OBLIGATION TO DENOUNCE (art. 302 CPP) LODGED AGAINST THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR OF FRIBOURG
Procureur Fabien Gasser
PROSECUTOR Fabien GASSER,

Very respectful of the hidden relations which bind him to the members of the Brotherhoods of lawyers, he forgets his general prosecutor's duty !

Criminal complaint has been lodged :

180103DE_AF

Note : The national Councillor Philippe BAUER showed that there was actually no neutral and independent Court to handle such a complaint, but the Swiss Constitution guarantees it !

PROSECUTOR FABIEN GASSER MADE ITS CHOICE WITH FULL KNOWLEDGE OF THE FACTS: HE VIOLATED THE OBLIGATION TO DENOUNCE THE BREACHES OF HIS ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR RAPHAËL BOURQUIN TO ALLOW THE NATIONAL COUNCILLOR ME PHILIPPE BAUER AND IN HIS ASSOCIATES, Me FOETISCH, ME BETTEX, Me BURNAND, ... TO PUT THE INTERESTS OF THEIR BROTHERHOOD BEFORE THOSE OF OURS NATION.
171004FG_DE

Question to our fellow citizens :
What a General Prosecutor has to do, if he knows the following request for a parliamentary inquiry : 051217DP_GC
... and that he knows that Me Christian BETTEX, state Lawyer, confirmed, in this given context, that the power of the judges is reduced as indicates it the request for a parliamentary inquiry ?

Who knew that in the judgment described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry, the President of the Court (Bertrand Sauterel) declared that Mr. Erni had undergone only a damage of 4000 CHF for the violation of the copyright while he had a judicial expertise, in his file, which estimated the damage at more than 2 million CHF?

Who knew that Judge Sauterel was forbidden by Me Foetisch Brotherhoods to make Me Burnet testify, because the latter made do the judicial expertise and that he could give evidence that judge Sauterel knew that the damage had been estimated at more than 2 millions and that Mr Erni was the object of a false complaint ?

Who knew that the national Councillor Philippe Bauer forced the federal Court to kneel before the Bar association to hand down the cantonal judgment which had ended this privilege. Privilèges

....according to the example of the national Councillor Philippe BAUER, Prosecutor Raphaël Bourquin violated the article 35 of the federal Constitution to protect the hidden privileges of the lawyers association. Prosecutor Fabien GASSER, in turn, violates the application of the article 302 CPP (obligation to denounce), while he has the duty to apply it. We remind that the Prosecutor has the obligation to respect the fundamental rights in his decisions (art 35 federal Constitution).

180103DE_AF

180103DE_MP

180103DE_DB

180103DE_AB

180103DE_BB

10.01.18
THE ZERO TOLERANCE BECOMES THE STANDARD AT PARLIAMENT
Président Parlement Dominique de BUMAN,
President of the Parliament

Contrary to his predecessors, he does not want to ignore the deficiencies of the justice and the violation of the fundamental rights

 

THE PRESIDENT OF THE PARLIAMENT GIVES THE EXAMPLE
On November 29th, after his election of First Citizen of the Country, Dominique De BUMAN, had announced its VALUES and how he saw his function.

He begins his year of Presidency by giving the example. Contrary to his predecessors, not only he answers the mails, but consequent with his VALUES and his function, he does not want to close his eyes on personalities who make an excessive use of their balance of power.

As soon as Mr. Erni got in conctact with him, Mr. de BUMAN invited Mr. Erni to carry this case of deficiencies of the justice in front of both Chambers of management of the PARLIAMENT which have the competence to enforce the federal Constitution.

Thanks to the President of the federal Assembly wanting to apply Zero tolerance for those who make an excessive use of their position of strength.
As a reminder, see part 171208DE_DB

Are the chambers of management of the Parliament going to create an ad hoc, not statutory Court, to end the economic criminality committed by professionals of the law with their privileges, as suggests it, judge Grégoire BOVET?
See Part 171231DE_GB

After Yannick BUTTET, it's time that the OMERTA is broken on the Harassment made by people like Me Philippe BAUER, who makes an excessive use of the balance of power which they have with their Title of lawyer, former President of a brotherhood, and their Parliament function.

171208DE_DB

171231DE_GB

02.01.18 ROYAL PRESENT OF THE NATIONAL COUNCILLOR, PHILIPPE BAUER, TO THE BOSS OF THE ORGANISED CRIME WITH THE HIDDEN RELATIONS BINDING THE LAWYERS, MEMBERS OF THE BROTHERHOODS TO THE COURTS
~EREPOULE A PHILIPPE BAUER

This national Councillor, puppeteer of Judges, with his Droit de Seigneur of former President of the Bar, made lay an egg of more than 40 000 CHF from one of his golden geese to thank his colleague Me Patrick Foetisch.
We remind that Me Patrick Foetisch showed that the judges have their power reduced by their privileges and that they are only their minions.

We wonder how Harvey Weinstein, who has violated the dignity of hundred women, was able to make an excessive use of his power during so many years with complete impunity?

Even more, each has to wonder how a National Councillor, as Philippe Bauer, who has no respect for the human dignity, was able to be elected to the Parliament having helped his colleague Foetisch to escape from justice by calling upon the privileges of his profession.

Who knew, when he elected Philippe BAUER, that the latter laughs completely with the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution and that he makes an excessive use of his power and of the privileges of his profession to favour the members of his brotherhood by the Courts by allowing them to violate the rights of the other citizens?

All the members of Parliament, who made a commitment not to tolerate any more a behaviour by one of theirs that publicly harms the human dignity, are invited to apply it for 2018 !

JUDGE SONIA BULLIARD GROSSET CONSIDERS FORCED, BY THE HIDDEN RELATIONS BIDING TO THE FEDERAL COURT OUR SWISS WEINSTEIN ( THE NATIONAL COUNCILLOR PHILIPPE BAUER), TO VIOLATE THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION IN HER DECISIONS !
GIVING IN TO PHILIPPE BAUER'S DROIT DU SEIGNEUR, SHE OFFERS 40 000 CHF, OBTAINED BY GRIME VIOLATION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, TO HIS COLLEAGUE, Me FOETISCH !
171222DE_TB
Our national Councillor, Philippe BAUER, with his Droit du Seigneur of former President of the Bar, is even worse than Harvey Weinstein. He is a real pimp of high-class prostitutes, minions of members of brotherhoods, from whom he get his golden eggs.

REMINDER OF THE HISTORY OF THIS GOLD EGG LAID FOR Me PHILIPPE BAUER IN THANKS OF HIS SERVICES PROVIDED TO THE MEMBERS OF THE BROTHERHOODS.

Audience of September 4th. 2002 ,
Me Burnet obtains the testimony of Me Foetisch made under oath. The latter gave evidence that the contract which bound him to Mr Erni is the one that judge showed him. This contract was dated October 19th, 1994. According to this contract Mr Erni holds the copyright. A judicial expertise estimates the damage due to the violation of the copyright to more than 2 millions of CHF according to this contract authenticated by Me Foetisch.

Audience of October 26th 2005,
Mr Erni is falsely accused by Me Foetisch Brotherhood and by his associates 4M / Jean-Claude Roch with a contract which they did not put in the criminal complaint so that the falsehood of that allegation cannot be verified. They assert that Mr Erni did not hold the copyright by attributing false phone words to Me Burnet. Me Burnet is the only witness who can deny this false allegation. Me BETTEX, President of the Bar of Me Foetisch brotherhood forbade that Me Burnet can testify in Court.
The President of the Court says that he cannot make him testify since Me Bettex, Bar President of the brotherhood, forbade him to testify.
J.S., a witness of the audience of September 4th, 2002, will testify on what was established on September 4th, 2002 with Me Burnet. The judge had by this way the evidence of the false allegation, 020909PF_JS.
President of the Court, Judge Sauterel, will cunningly not mention this evidence in his judgment. He will assert in his judgment that Mr Erni did not undergo a damage greater than 4000 CHF, while he knows that the judicial expertise established it of more than 2 millions CHF based on the evidence of the testimony of Me Foetisch.
Me Foetisch brotherhood refuses to make a commitment to allow the unique witness of the false allegation to testify in the future, what makes impossible to deny the cunningly deceit of the Judge Sauterel.
A request of parliamentary inquiry is put down on these hidden relations which bind lawyers, members of brotherhoods, to the Courts 051217DP_GC
Me de Rougemont, lawyer mandated by the Parliament, confirms the existence of these hidden relations which bind lawyers, members of brotherhoods, to the Courts. He stressed that the code of procedure cannot take into account this hidden relations. Consequently, it is not applicable.

Judgement of Neuchâtel February 3rd, 2009
The Court of Neuchâtel, made aware of the violation of the fundamental rights by the brotherhood of Me Foetisch - who makes an excessive use of his hidden privileges - and made aware of the evidence established by Me Burnet on September 3rd, 2002, agrees with Mr Erni. The Court confirms that the brotherhood of Me Foetisch did not have the right to forbid Me Burnet to testify under these circumstances 090203_jugement_NE
Intervention of our Swiss Weinstein at the Federal Court
Philippe BAUER, big President of the Bar, laughing completely with the respect for the fundamental rights, requires and obtains cunningly from the Federal Court that it breaks this judgment of Neuchâtel based on the respect of the fundamental rights.
Philippe BAUER is then going to require the gratitude for the power of his brotherhood which can commit crimes with complete impunity
Further to this Philippe BAUER's intervention, one of its geese that lays the golden eggs, Sonia BULLIARD GROSSET, has just given 40 000 CHF to Me Foetisch for having shown that Me Philippe BAUER, National Councillor, defends unworthy Values for a PARLIAMENTARY. It should be stressed that the Values of Philippe BAUER are worse than those of Yannick BUTTET. Nobody was aware of this hidden face of Me Philippe BAUER during his election campaign to the Parliament and the way he is using his Droit du Seigneur with a code of procedure which cannot take into account his hidden privileges which bind him to the Federal Court.

051217DP_GC

Privilèges

170919DE_TB

171207TB_DE

171222DE_TB

2017 2018 TARGET

Continue to unmask people in charge of a task of the State who violate the respect of the constitutional fundamental rights in their decision or their behavior.

Theme of the Year 2018:
The right to respect for the human dignity is not negotiable

"ZERO TOLERANCE BECOMES THE STANDARD TO THE PARLIAMENT"

"Let us act with the members of the honorable Authorities to enforce the constitutional guaranteed fundamental rights by unmasking publicly the elected representatives who have a behavior contrary to the Values of our Constitution "

 
2018 HAPPY NEW YEAR
****************
Thanks

 

Best Wishes to all the readers for a good Health.
***********************************************************************
THANK YOU to everyone who dared to denounce in a public way the personalities and magistrates who are abusing their position and power, despite the risks of reprisals.

Sohn von Tell

 
2017 THE YEAR 2017 IN REVIEW RIGHT IN THE RESPECT FOR THE HUMAN DIGNITY....
For the first time national Councillors dared to break the OMERTA on those who make an excessive use of their position of strength.

Sohn von Tell

 
27.12.17 COMPLAINT AGAINST THE BCV FOR VIOLATION OF THE BANK SECRECY
CEO BCV
PASCAL KIENER, CEO OF THE BCV, SEEMS QUITE AMAZED

Jean-Claude Roch's silence, with the silence of Me Claude ROUILLER and harassment of the national Councillor Philippe Bauer should refresh him the memory !

OUR SWISS WEINSTEIN, THE NATIONAL COUNCILLOR, PHILIPPE BAUER, CAN AFFORD TO HAVE A VERY BIG SMILE:
After the hidden relations, binding the members of brotherhoods of lawyers to the Courts, which put our Swiss Weinstein over the laws, the BCV announces that it also has hidden legal requirements to finance the organized crime with these hidden relations binding the members of brotherhoods to the Courts.

IN A MORE PRECISE WAY, DO YOU KNOW THAT THE EMPLOYEES OF THE BCV HAVE THE RIGHT, WITH HIDDEN LEGAL REQUIREMENTS, TO VIOLATE THE BANK SECRECY ON THE ACCOUNTS OF THEIR CUSTOMERS TO ALLOW MEMBERS OF BROTHERHOODS TO EMPTY THESE ACCOUNTS FOR FINANCING SOME ORGANIZED CRIME:
Pascal Kiener, CEO of the BCV, seems quite amazed to hear from these hidden legal requirements which violate in a grime way the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution. Nevertheless, his employees apply them and he already knew in 2015 that Jean-Claude Roch was directly involved in this business of economic criminality which is made public today. See part d2480.

...Criminal complaint has been lodged, : 171222DE_AF

The president of the Confederacy and the President of the federal Assembly are informed about the situation which raises the issue of the access to neutral and independent Courts.

The instruction of the criminal complaint should allow Pascal KIENER to bring the precisions on the private data protection and the assets protection of the customers of the BCV, who can be swindled by criminal organizations with these hidden legal requirements applied by the BCV staff.

171222DE_AF

d2480

171222DE_DL

171222DE_DB

20.12.17 HE IS NOT HARVEY WEINSTEIN !
HE IS OUR SWISS WEINSTEIN, WHO, USING THE HIDDEN RELATIONS BINDING HIM WITH HIS COLLEAGUES OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION TO THE FEDERAL COURT, CAN VIOLATE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE VICTIMS OF THEIR CRIMES WITH COMPLETE IMPUNITY !

GRAND BÂTONNIER

You have recognized him !!!
He is the FORMER BIG PRESIDENT of the BAR ASSOCIATION,
THE NATIONAL COUNCILLOR,
ME PHILIPPE BAUER
!

As Yannick BUTTET, he is the subject of a criminal complaint lodged for the violation of the fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Constitution to have made an excessive use of his power with his hidden privileges.

He laughs because the hidden relations, which bind him to the Courts, make judges his minions!

The victims of Harvey Weinstein did not dare to break the silence by fear of reprisals.
The Former Big President of the BAR, with the members of his brotherhood, deserve the GOLDEN PALM for the omerta that they make reign over the violation of the fundamental rights by the members of their brotherhood by means of their hidden relations which bind them to the federal Courts !


THE PDC AND THE PARLIAMENT LADIES HAD THE COURAGE TO DEFEND THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION AND TO BREAK THE OMERTA FOR ADDRESSING ON THE SUBSTANCE ISSUES OF HARASSEMENT :

Yannick BUTTET have to leave the Parliament for an unworthy behavior of a Member of Parliament while he has extenuating circumstances.

WITH THIS RETURN TOWARDS THE RESPECT OF THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION, IT'S TIME THAT THE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT DARE TO BREAK THE OMERTA ON THE MEMBERS OF BROTHERHOODS WHICH DO NOT LIMIT THEMSELVES WITH INAPPRORIATE TOUCHING AS YANNICK BUTTET HAS DONE IT, BUT WHICH COMMIT REAL CRIMES AGAINST WEAKER CITIZENS WITH AN EXCESSIVE USE OF THEIR POWER AS P. BAUER.

Philippe BAUER is required to answer in front of our nation for an excessive use of his power much more graver, without extenuating circumstances as professionnal of the law. For that purpose, the members of Parliament have to dare to break the OMERTA by organizing a confrontation between the witnesses of the existence of the hidden relations and P. Bauer, further to what this TITAN of the World of the brotherhoods was propelled in the National Council with an unworthy behavior of member of Parliament, but deserving of members of a criminal organization and deteriorated by his profession and the power of his public service function.

SEE PROPOSAL :171217DE_DB

DISCOVER THE WORLD OF THE BROTHERWOODS WITH THE HIDDEN RELATIONS LINKING P. BAUER TO THE COURTS, OVER WHOM, HIS COLLEAGUES OF THE BAR, Me BETTEX AND Me ROUILLER MAKE REIGN THE OMERTA WITH MINIONS AT EVERY LEVEL OF OUR COURTS :
See page 2 to 4 of part :171217DE_AF

Example of questions on which P. BAUER would have to give some explanation during a confrontation :
1) Do you know that a President of the Bar, with the hidden relations linking his brotherhood to the Courts, can prevent the lodging and the investigation of a criminal complaint against a Director who commits a swindle, because he is a member of a Brotherhood ?

Not you ?!!!, But P. BAUER knows it, because it is a hidden right which does not appear in the Constitution. Furthermore, as Former President of the Bar P. BAUER defended this hidden privilege by using the hidden relations which bound him to the Courts!

2) Do you know that the members of a Brotherhood can lodge a false denunciation, with the relations linking them to the Courts, which is impossible to contradict, to make professionnal blackmail against citizens who require that Courts apply the federal Constitution and do not accept that the members of a brotherhoods can harass and violate the fundamental rights with complete impunity as can do it P. BAUER with the members of the brotherhoods. ?

No You ?!!, And Yannick BUTTET either did not know it !, That's reserved to the members of Brotherhoods among whom P. BAUET is a Leader !

171217DE_DB

171217DE_AF

171217DE_DL

13.12.17 NATIONAL COUNCILLORS LADIES DARE TO BREAK THE SILENCE ON THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS VIOLATION
BY MR. Yannick BUTTET

Conseiller NationalHis party, the PDC, reacts to defend the Values of the Constitution.
As a result : The national Councillor Yannick BUTTET cannot violate anymore the fundamental rights. He has to apologize and assume his behavior
CONGRATULATIONS TO THE NATIONAL COUNCILLOR LADIES WHO DARED TO BREAK SILENCE ON THESE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO FORGET TO RESPECT THE CITIZENS WHO DO NOT HAVE THEIR POWER !
PDC Party Position reminder that they are the defenders of the Values of the Constitution must be welcomed !

It must be raised that there are national Councillor who violate in a clearly more grime way the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution than Mr BUTTET did it by abusing of his power.
It is just that the national Councillor YANNICK BUTTET has to assume its abuses of power, but we must not forget that a national Councillor, as Me PHILIPPE BAUER, exerted much graver harassment than Yannick BUTTET by making an excessive use of the power of its lawyer association and by exploiting the hidden relations to the public which bind him to the Courts.

We remind that Me Philippe Bauer was the object of a criminal complaint before being elected. This penal complaint was clearly graver than the one deposited against Yannick BUTTET. It was cancelled with the violation of the fundamental rights to cover economical crimes committed by his colleagues of his lawyer association by using the hidden privileges to the public which bind him to the Courts.

Today national Councillor Me Philippe BAUER is the object of a new criminal complaint. 171208DE_AF
Let us hope that national Councillors will dare this time to break the silence on the abuses of power of the national Councillor Me Philippe Bauer and that the President of the federal Assembly will confirm the will of his party to enforce the fundamental rights.
171208DE_DB

171208DE_DB

171208DE_AF

171208DE_TB

171208DE_DL

171208DE_BB

171208DE_FB

171208DE_ML

 

06.12.17 PORTRAIT IN THE GLORY OF ALL THESE CRIMINALS ADMINISTERING JUSTICE IN SWITZERLAND
BABOUPORTRAIT OF THE SLAVE BABOU
One of the martyrs of Me FOETISCH
A picture to be displayed on the bed of each magistrate !
ALREADY IN 1992, ME PATRICK FOETISCH WAS THE IDOL OF THE CRIMINALS ADMINISTERING JUSTICE IN SWITZERLAND
It is the duty of the seniors to remind to the young magistrates that the Great Lord of Lawyers, Me Patrick FOETISCH, gives the image to the world that justice is administered by criminals in Switzerland.

Even if the President of the penal federal Court, Daniel Kipfer Fasciati or if Virignie SONNEY prefer to have displayed on their bed the picture of the Great Lord, Patrick Foetisch, for whom they sacrified their soul and who they worship with all their heart, see part 171126DE_TB......, it will be innovative, to display the picture of the SLAVE BABOU (Babou) instead of the picture of Me Foetisch on their Bed !
171204DE_TB

They would so have a certificate in the glory of the Great Master which would give evidence that in 2000, they could already violate the fundamental rights of the weakest citizen during more than 8 years by applying the hidden law from their Great Lord who allows them to by-pass the article 35 of the Constitution in a grime way in their decision.

This certificate would remind them why Me de ROUGEMONT tells them that their code of procedures does not allow them to respect the federal Constitution, ...and if they use it, they must be considered as criminals who commit an abuse of power by administering justice !
171205DE_DF

171126DE_TB

171204DE_TB

171205DE_DF

 

29.11.17
ANSWER IS REQUIRED FROM
THE 2016-2017 PRESIDENT
OF THE FEDERAL ASSEMBLY

Juerg Stahl
Jürg Stahl
WHAT IS THE DUTY OF A FATHER TOWARDS HIS WIFE, HER DAUGHTER AND ALL THOSE WHO ELECTED HIM TO ENFORCE THE GUARANTEED FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE FOLLOWING ISSUE:

" Do you know that the hidden relations - which bind lawyers to the Courts - allow a President of the Bar to prevent the instruction of a complaint against a President of a company, member of its brotherhood, which commits economic crimes.
To see part : 171125DE_JS

"Do you know that the members of criminal organizations use this principle to commit crimes with complet impunity by violating in a grime way the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution..."

The same issue has been submitted to five of our elected representatives who have the skill to enforce the federal Constitution !
See page 8 of part : 171125DE_AF

171125DE_JS

171125DE_AF

22.11.17 CHALLENGE OF THE COURT REJECTED BY THE LAWYER 49 YEARS OLD YOUNGER CHILD OF Me PATRICK FOETISCH, THE GREAT LORDS OF THE LAWYERS
It is with a incredible withcraft trick that Virginia Sonney, Fribourg University Graduate LAWYER, managed to decide on of her own challenge as well as the complete Court challenge which she all rejected.
See part 171030TB_DE

The magicians do not have the right to reveal how they do their magic trick, but an engineer can do it.
For the sorcerer's apprentices, learn the brilliant and fabulous trick used by Virginia Sonney to violate the federal Constitution, see part. 171118DE_TB

THE EXPLANATIONS OF Me De ROUGEMONT ON THE VIOLATION OF THE ACCESS TO NEUTRAL AND INDEPENDENT COURTS WERE NOT ENOUGH FOR VIRGINIA SONNEY, REVERING THE GREAT LORDS, TO MAKE APPLY THE CONSTITUTION.
While she knows that her code of procedure is not applicable because it does not allow to take into account the relations which bind lawyers to the Courts, see page 8 of part 171118DE_TB,
while she knows that the Fribourg Prosecution exerted constraint on the lawyer of the plaintiff with a criminal complaint lodged by Me Foetisch, see page 8 of the part 170919DE_TB,
while she knows that a complaint is lodged with the Big Council of Fribourg State for violation of the article 35 of the federal Constitution,
..... she revealed her power of big witch to allow Me Patrick FOETISCH to increase the damage by violation the access to neutral and independent Courts.

Only drawback, we are not in the Castle of POUDLARD, she is not the lawyer of the Great Lord FOETISCH, but she is the President of the Court.
An example of audit made by a lead auditor shows that she violates the article 35 of the federal Constitution and that the BIG COUNCIL should make sure that it appoints Judges who did not go out quite straight ahead of HARRY POTTER'S SAGA,
see page 14 of part 171118DE_TB

170919DE_TB

171030TB_DE

171118DE_TB

15.11.17 FIGHT AGAINST UNETHICAL PROSECUTORS WHO SEEM TO THINK THEY ARE GARGAMEL
GARGAMEL PROCUREUR

SORCERER PROSECUTOR
Gargamel Bourquin

THE PROSECUTION AUTHORITY QUESTIONED TO HAVE THREATEN THE LAWYER OF THE VICTIM FOR AFFECTING THE TRIAL IN FAVOUR OF THE CRIMINAL
171112DE_MP

PROSECUTOR RAPHAËL BOURQUIN HAS THE POWER TO CREATE DAMAGE TO THE VICTIMS OF CRIMES COMMITTED BY MEMBERS OF LAWYERS ASSOCIATION BY VIOLATING IN A GRIME WAY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION
See below date of 30.09.2017
170929RB_DE
A prosecutor or a magistrate who, as Tariq RAMADAN or Harley WEINSTEIN, got used to making an excessive use of his power to censor and falsify the public information when he creates damages to those who depend on him, cannot do it anymore shielded from the lights.
A Prosecutor, who takes a decision "not to consider the application" by violating the right to be heard and who charges expenses to the victims to discourage them from obtaining the respect of their rights, is more dangerous than a Tariq RAMADAN or a Harley WEINSTEIN.
It is particlarly bad when in the same case, the same Prosecution helped the author of the crimes to threaten the lawyer of the plaintiff with a false denunciation.
Such a prosecutor acts as a member of the EI which protects the criminal by establishing a climate of fear! It is called an abuse of authority by a professional of the law !
171112DE_MP
171112DE_MP
08.11.17 JÜRG STAHL, PRESIDENT OF THE PARLIAMENT, HAS TO BREAK THE OMERTA ON THE DAMAGES CAUSED WITH THE PRIVILEGES OF THE LAWYERS WHICH REDUCE THE DECISION-MAKING OF THE COURTS
There are not only in ANGOLA that powerful leaders create damages by making an excessive use of their privileges. The role of Jürg Stahl is to act as soon as he has been informed about these violations of the Values of the federal Constitution.
171029DE_AF

He is now duly informed !
As Ruth Metzler, he has to act to show that he does not want to be in collusion with organized crime while he has the duty to enforce the will of our nation !

THE RESIGNATION OF RUTH METZLER OF THE GROUP QUANTUM SHOWS TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE PARLIAMENT THAT THE TOP LEADERS OF THE COUNTRY CAN NO MORE EXERCISE THE OMERTA ON THE DAMAGES CAUSED WITH PRIVILEGES BY THOSE WHO HOLD THE POWER
The serious charge on the "commercial Practices in Angola" revealed by the journalistic investigation on Paradises PAPERS led Ruth METZLER, former federal Councillor, in announced publicly his resignation of the Group QUANTUM. Duly informed, she chose to defend her Values (source 20 minutes)

At present Me Foetisch, the extremely powerful lawyer of Lausanne, makes the federal Councillor Simonetta SOMMARUGA trembling in her boots, to the point that she does not dare to make her duty of Minister of Justice, and to the point that she chose to make the OMERTA reign over the privileges of the lawyers which reduce the decision-making power of the Courts.
In spite of this code of Silence that makes reign Simonetta Sommaruga, thanks to the digital technologies, the OMERTA cannot be any more maintained on the damages caused with the privileges of the members of association of lawyers in Switzerland.
For the curious who want to discover some of these privileges, to read page 8, 9 of the following part :
170919DE_TB

171029DE_AF

170919DE_TB

01.11.17 THE MEMBERS OF FEDERAL COUNCIL IN CHORUS WITH A DECISION BY PROXY AGREE WITH THE DISSIDENT LAWYER !
According to their decision, they violate in way grime the right of every citizen to have access to neutral and independent Courts !
They are reminded that the Shaman asked them 5 questions which they have to answer in individual way to identify the "WEINSTEINS among them, who do not want to respect the fundamental rights of the citizens which depend on their decision !
FOR THE FIRST TIME THE MEMBERS OF FEDERAL COUNCIL CONFIRM THAT THEY DO NOT WANT TO ENFORCE ANY MORE THE FUNDAMENTAL GUARANTEED RIGHTS BY THE CONSTITUTION !
This answer is against the Values of Didier Burkhalter unless he is a sun of Satan : 171024DE_DB
This answer confirms the behavior of Simonetta SOMMARUGA : 171029DE_SS
This answer by proxy does not correspond to the public commitments taken by the other federal Councillors to enforce the guaranteed human rights by the federal Constitution.
171027DE_DL; 171029DE_JS; 171029DE_GP; 171029DE_UM; 171029DE_AB
Even, if they confirm to the dissident lawyer that he has their approval to make brring down one of them with this outrageous and provocative decision who violate human rights, they are not freed to respect their personal Values which they defended to be elected!
An individual answer is required from those who do not agree with this outrageous answer given on their behalf by proxy!

171027DE_DL

171024DE_DB

171029DE_JS

171029DE_GP

171029DE_UM

171029DE_AB

171029DE_SS

25.10.17 WARNING OF THE VIOLATION OF THE ACCESS TO A NEUTRAL AND INDEPENDENT COURT
To change Judge is of no use to counter the crimes committed with the relations which bind lawyers to the Courts !
Court President Virginie SONNEY is warned !
171016DE_TB

The President of the Big Council of Fribourg State is informed !

IF A JUDGE WANTS TO RESPECT THE FUNDAMENTAL GUARANTEED RIGHTS BY THE CONSTITUTION, HE HAS THE OBLIGATION TO RECUSE HIMSELF IN THIS SITUATION
The code de procedure does not allow to take into consideration that the judgment was deceitfully obtained with the relations which bind lawyers to the Courts and constraint on lawyer.
He does not allow to take into account that Prosecutor Bourquin used an illicit process worthy of Gargamel to hide the affair BETTEX ! 170929DE_RB
The former President of the Council of Vaud State, Pierre-Yves MAILLARD can estimate the impact of its SILENCE on Human Right Violation, while the Chancellery of State had made a commitment not to turn a blind eye on the violation of the access to neutral and independent Courts.
171020DE_PM

171016DE_TB

171020DE_PM

18.10.17 THE WHYS OF THE LIFE OF A GENERAL PROSECUTOR :
WHY DOES NOT PROSECUTOR FABIEN GASSER WANT TO MAKE RESPECT THE FUNDAMENTAL GUARANTEED RIGHTS BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION ?

171004FG_DE
Answer brought with the scientific approach described by Jacques DUBOCHET !
171013DE_FB
TO UNDERSTAND IN ORDER NOT TO BE AFRAID : IT IS THE SCIENTIFIC APPROACH RECOMMENDED BY JACQUES DUBOCHET, NOBEL PRIZE IN CHEMISTRY 2017, JOYFUL ATHEIST.
The scientific approach proposed by Jacques DUBOCHET allows to understand why the dissident lawyer recommends to the victims of denial of justice : "to make bring down a federal Councillor to force the members of Federal Council to enforce by the Courts the fundamental Rights further to what Prosecutors violate the fundamental rights to allow criminal to act with complete impunity with their protection !
To know its fate and the whys of his Life, Prosecutor Fabien GASSER has still to answer to the questions of the Shaman which are not explicable with the scientific approach. These 5 questions are meaningful for a scientist, even if he cannot answer them ! 171013DE_FB

171004FG_DE

171013DE_FB

11.10.17 MATTER OF COMMON SENSE:
NO NEUTRAL COURT =
NO POSSIBLE DECISIONS

It is reminded to the magistrates that if they work for a Court which is not independent, their code of procedure is not applicable.
It does not free them from the duty to respect the federal Constitution. In such a case they have the obligation to recuse themselves spontaneously to assure the respect for the guaranted fundamental rights by the Constitution.
171006DE_TB
THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION GUARANTEES THE ACCESS TO NEUTRAL AND INDEPENDENT COURTS. THE CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION WHICH PROTECTS ME FOETISCH OBSTRUCTS HIS VICTIMS TO THE ACCESS OF NEUTRAL AND INDEPENDENT COURTS.
It is reminded that the criminal organizations force the citizens to commit unfair procedures in front of Courts which are not independent to despoil them.
For the magistrate who does not want to be in collusion with the criminal organization which protects Me Foetisch, he does not need a code of procedure to recuse himself. He just has to say that, further to the relations which bind the members of the Brotherhoods of lawyers to the Courts, he has to recuse himself because he cannot respect the federal Constitution with his Court which is not independent and which has no code of applicable procedure for this case.
In case of conflict of right, it is always the supreme right, which must be taken as references and to apply, that is the federal Constitution !
171006DE_TB
04.10.17 A RED ALERT HAS BEEN ISSUED TO THE HIGH AUTHORITIES OF THE STATE: A LAWYER IS CUNNINGLY FORCED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTION WITH THE USE OF A SUSPENDED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT TO VIOLATE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF HIS CUSTOMER:
170930DE_FG
A complaint for aggravated permanent denial of justice is sent to the Highest Authorities of the State
171001DE_MR
THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE HIJACKED BY THE CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION OF Me FOETISCH CANNOT RESPECT ANYMORE THE FUNDAMENTAL DIGNITY OF THE CITIZEN. THE HIJACKING VINDICATES THE SHAMAN PREDICTION :
The violation of the human dignity of fribourgeois citizens by the terrible and Machiavellian trap of the Prosecutor nicknamed " Gargamel" is of the responsibility of State Top leaders.
170929DE_RB
It's time to unmask the Top Leaders who protect the criminal organization of Me Foetisch and would betray their duty of elected representatives.
The federal Court is directly involved with the censorship which it exercised on the Report " ROUILLER" to violate the human dignity.
160819RS_TF
It is time to identify the freemasonry members who are traitor to the Country and who help Me Foetisch to commit his crimes with full impunity.

170930DE_FG

171001DE_MR

30.09.17 MACHIAVELLIAN & TERRIFYING ANSWER OF PROSECUTOR RAPHAËL BOURQUIN FOR THE CITIZENS OF FRIBOURG STATE
170916DE_RB
He is not the Prosecutor of all the citizens but only the Prosecutor of those who want to trick the citizens by violating in a grime way the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution. He is a Traitor to the Country !
170920RB_DE
Prosecutor Raphaël Bourquin forgot that he is paid by our taxes to enforce the respect of the article 35 of the Federal Constitution. He could be the object of reprisals of the GER as all magistates who violate the fundamental rights.
HIS ANSWER WILL BE TRANSMITTED TO THE HIGHESTS AUTHORITIES OF THE COUNTRY. THE PREDICTION OF THE SHAMAN BECOMES MORE AND MORE SUPRISING BUT TRUE !
170929RB_DE
Our elected representatives have named as Prosecutor : a Machiavellian magistate who has the VALUES of A GARGAMEL, while they have to name a Prosecutor who has the ethics and the Values of the PAPA SMURF !.
The word will be given to the members of the highest cantonal and federal Authorities to check if they want Prosecutors who are Gargamel who protect the interests of criminal organizations as those of the high freemasonry, or unlike Prosecutors who protect the rights of all the citizens who make the strength, the independence and the pride of Switzerland.
Prosecutor Raphaël Bourquin shows that the dissident lawyer of the GER did no exaggerate, when he says that the Words are of use to nothing more in front of Authorities which do not want to enforce any more the guaranteed fundamental rights by the the federal Constitution. He agrees with the lawyer who says that Switzerland needs a Maurice Bavaud to end the actions of the criminal organizations.
161010DE_SS
170916DE_RB

170920RB_DE

170929RB_DE

161010DE_SS

25.09.17 Me de MONTMOLLIN GIVES A WARNING OF DEAD MAN TO THE FEDERAL COUNCILLORS
170923DE_SS
Professor BOHNET hid to the authorities the terrible secret which Me de Montmollin took in his grave, see page 8 in the part : 170919DE_TB
The role of the justice is not to support the criminal organizations with terrorists disguised in judge, but to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution.
DEAD, Me DE MONTMOLLIN HAD TO BREAK, IN SPITE OF HIM, HIS SILENCE OF DEAD MAN ON THE TERRIBLE SECRET WHICH HE HAS TAKEN IN HIS GRAVE
The limit of the permanent denial of justice are marked by the death of those who participate in it.
The role of the criminal justice is not to work on incomplete files or to setting aside cases against one of the parties. His role is not to discourage the citizens to obtain the respect of their constitutional fundamental rights
170920DE_FB
It is time that the top leaders of the country end the permanent denial of justice before the death stikes those who make exercise the OMERTA ON THE ROUILLER REPORT.
The death of Me de Montmollin is here to remind it. this reminder applies as well to the Cantonal level as the federal one.
170922DE_MR

170919DE_TB

170920DE_FB

170922DE_MR

170923DE_SS

19.09.17 PROSECUTOR RAPHAËL BOURQUIN HAS DIFFICULTIES TO BE HEARD BY THE PENAL CHAMBER
Since he decided to break the SILENCE for avoiding to create deliberate damage and violating the constitutional fundamental rights, the Prosecutor get difficulties to be heard
170908TC_DE
TO ENFORCE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE SWISS CONSTITUTION IS MORE DIFFICULT THAN TO SERVE THE INTERESTS OF A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION:
If Prosecutor Raphaël Bourquin put an end to the abuses of authority and make condemn the professionals of the law who abuse of their privileges, it will be a first turn for the penal courts which will finally apply the article 3 of Penal Procedure code 312.0
170916DE_TC
170916DE_RB
It belongs to Prosecutor Bourquin to bring an answer on its objective in order that a decision can be taken for the next step

170908TC_DE

170916DE_TC

170916DE_RB

 

17.09.17 SIMONETTA SOMMARUGA WITH HER ENDANGERED FAMILY LIFE CLOSES HER EYES
Ministre de la Justice
HER FIGHT AGAINST THE DEATH WITH HER SILENCE WHICH SHE DOES NOT DARE TO BREAK
THE TERRIBLE FATE OF SIMONETTA SOMMARUGA IS NOT PLAYED YET ! BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE, SHE CAN STILL OPEN HER EYES AND BREAK HER SILENCE TO BE FOCUSED ON THE VALUES OF THE LIFE !
A Shaman asks her 5 questions to help her to take the control of the situation in hand. She could rely on the support of her husband

She has to remind to her colllaborators that she is their Cheffe and that she doesn't allow them to treat the victims of denial of justice as shit by forcing her to keep silence !

She has the power and the means to show to the members of the criminal organizations and to the members of the freemasonry that they cannot invert anymore the law for committing their crime with full impunity.

Wake up Simonetta, Open your eyes SImonetta, it is time to break your SILENCE, it is time to show that you are the minister of Justice who defends the fundamental rights of all citizens.

170915DE_SS
13.09.17 THE BREAKING OF THE WALL OF SILENCE BY PROSECUTOR RAPHAËL BOURQUIN IS ENIGMATIC FOR THE PENAL COURT
170828TC_DE

The most important is to hear what he knows and why he chose to say of its own responsibility in front of those who violate the guaranteed rights by the federal Constitution
170906DE_TC

THE INTERVENTION BY THE SHAMAN 161010DE_SS,...
THE PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY 051217DP_GC,...
THE INTERVENTION BY Me DE ROUGEMONT 070424DP_GC,...
THE INTERVENTION BYMe BETTEX 160610DE_PM,...
THE INTERVENTION BY THE DISSIDENT LAWYER 161003DE_IG,...
...
GIVE EVIDENCE OF THE EXISTENCE OF A HIDDEN WORLD CONNECTED TO THE ACTIONS OF THE CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION
In this given context, it is not surprising that Prosecutor Bourquin decides to break the wall of silence on the Report of Me ROUILLER, of his own responsibility
170830DE_RB

170819DE_RB

170830DE_RB

170828TC_DE

170906DE_TC

07.09.17 DAD, YOU HAVE TO ACT OR I CANNOT SMILE ANY MORE !
It is the cry that every child could throw to a father lawyer, colleague to Me Foetisch and Me AD.

Which action can take the father of a child if he is lawyer, President of The council of state, and he wants that his child can always smile ?

The question is asked to Maurice ROPRAZ, President of the council of state of Fribourg.
170904DE_MR

ME FOETISCH REQUIRES FROM COURTS THAT THEY RUIN THE VICTIMS OF HIS CRIMES BY PRACTISING THE PERMANENT DENIAL OF JUSTICE
Me Foetisch requires that a victim of his swindle pays him 40 000 CHF. He justifies this requirement by saying that he brought the proof during more than 20 years that Swiss Courts would never investigate his crimes, thanks to his Title of lawyer and the hidden rules which bind lawyers to Swiss Courts.
170825TB_DE
Today," youtube" and the social network allow the children to discover unfair behavior of members of their family who could disgrace them.
Assessment : Censorship exercised by the federal Court on the report of Me Claude Rouiller will not resist to the social network. Me AD will not have more than to hold its commitment to make bring down a federal Councillor to force the federal Councillors to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the Courts.
160520RS_TF and 160819RS_TF

170904DE_MR

170825TB_DE

160520RS_TF

160819RS_TF

04.09.17 PROSECUTOR RAPHAËL BOURQUIN WANTS TO BREAK SILENCE ON THE REPORT OF ME CLAUDE ROUILLER
Prosecutor R. Bourquin gives the green light so that the violation of the fundamental rights, which is a direct consequence of the report on the permanent denial of justice of Me Claude Rouiller is the object of interviews under "youtube"
170819DE_RB
MADE AWARE THAT THE VICTIMS OF DENIAL OF JUSTICE ARE NOT DOGS AND THAT HE IS NOT A STUPID FREEMASON, THE PROSECUTOR HAS TAKEN THIS DECISION.
His decision suggest that he did not receive a complete file which allowed him to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution.
170830DE_RB
One THANK YOU to the indignant who suggested making interviews under "youtube" and who will help to spread them.
Thanks to the dissident lawyer for the quality of the references and the information which he supplied on those who protect Me Foetisch. A subject which will be proposed for youtube is: "Which federal Councillor and which person in charge of a task of the state is ready be brought down to turn a blind eye on the organized crime"

170819DE_RB

170830DE_RB

03.09.17 ECOMONICAL CRIMINALITY:
WHISTLE BLOWING ON TIME AT BCV DIRECTION

There is a serious glitch in the bank procedures which allows the members of a criminal organisation to be self financed by empting the private customer accounts with fraudulent statement obtained by the violation of the guaranteed fundamental rights of the Swiss Constitution.
This criminal organisation uses the principle of "the opposite of the presentation" to commit its crimes. It is the typical method used by the top freemasonry in economical criminality.
170831DE_BC
EACH KNOWS HOW CUNNING PROCEDURES ALLOWED BANKS TO BY-PASS THE USA CONSTITUTION
This time, it is the Swiss Constitution which is violated by professionals of the law. Among them are members of the Courts.
There is a Lecturer in Law, Me Claude ROUILLER, who made a report on this case of criminality, which is called "permanent justice denial. The good faith of his report has been disputed by professional of the law.
The Direction of the BCV has the opportunity and responsibility to show that it protects the interests of his customers and that it is going to assure the respect of the fundamental rights guaranteed by by the Swiss Constitution. The Direction cannot ignore anymore these professionnals of the law who divert the power of the Courts to commit crimes with complete impunity.
The federal Council is directly concerned by this report of Me Claude ROUILLER. He is informed about the situation.
170831DE_CF
It is recommended to the bank to require of Me Claude ROUILLER that he answers publicly the questions of the specialists on his report.

170831DE_BC

170831DE_CF

29.08.17 ECONOMICAL CRIMINALITY: CHECK OF THE DATA SUPPLIED BY POWER OF PROCURATION EMPLOYEES OF THE BCV
Power of procuration Employees of the BCV assert it received from the Prosecution officer, Mr Bertand Tschanz, the order to make a seizure at the expense of Mr Erni.
170822DE_BK
BANKS HAVE TO RESPECT THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THEIR CUSTOMER GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION
How come that the Prosecution Officer could have ordered a bank to make a seizure without informing Mr Erni about it.
Is it an act of constraint in relation with the vitiated report of Me Claude Rouiller ?
At first, it is necessary to verify the bankers assertion !
If the State wants to finance some organized crime by empting the bank accounts of citizens, it will be the challenge of the bankers to show that their procedures respect the fundamental rights of their customer, guaranteed by the SWISS CONSTITUTION !
170822DE_BK
19.08.17 PERMANENT DENIAL OF JUSTICE: EMPLOYEES FROM COURTS READY TO SACRIFY A FEDERAL COUNCILLOR RATHER THAN TO RESPECT THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
It is reminded to these employees that even if they are the object of pressure on behalf of a criminal organization, they have to respect the guaranteed rights by the Constitution. If their boss asks them to execute an order which violates the fundamental rights, they have to refuse or require a disclaimer of responsibility from their superior.
1170818DE_TB
IT IS INCREDIBLE THAT ME CLAUDE ROUILLER, A FORMER FEDERAL JUDGE, CANNOT PRESENT AND DEFEND PUBLICILY HIS REPORT WHICH HE WROTE ON THE PERMANENT DENIAL, WHILE PROFESSIONALS OF THE LAW DISPUTED IT.
ME AD had announced it. Me AD says that one needs that a Maurice BAVAUD who brings down a federal Councillor to end the violation of the fundamental rights with the permanent denial of justice.
Eric FIORIL is a reference given by Me AD to understand the functioning ot the criminal organization behind this case. The latterr implicates all the freemasonry, see son youtube :
"Préparez vous au Grand Chaos pour 2018"
URL ALTERNATIF : "Préparez-vous au Grand Chaos pour 2018"

Nevertheless every citizen who is obliged to violate the fundamental rights by the freemasonry can always require a disclaimer of responsibility of his boss.

1170818DE_TB
08.08.17 EXEMPLARY BEHAVIOR OF THE LEADER OF THE FREIBOURG STATE POLICE
He transmits the file to the delegate Prosecutor who has the skill and the duty to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution
170724MA_DE
THE SILENCE OF THE FEDERAL COUNCIL IN FRONT OF AN ABUSE OF AUTHORITY MADE WITH A VITIATED PROCEDURE DOESN'T OBLIGE A STATE EMPLOYEE TO APPLY THIS PROCEDURE
As shows it the leader of the state police :
If a state employee ask him to apply a procedure which is disputed by penal way, not only he doesn't say that he is obliged to violate the fundamental rights, but especially he makes the effort to transmit the file to the Prosecutor to be sure that the prosecutor received it and that the Prosecutor will enforce the article 35 of the federal Constitution.

170724MA_DE

170724DE_MA

170724DE_FG

170726DE_CF

07.07.17 THE SUICIDE OF THE LEADER OF THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT OF THE CANTON OF NEUCHÂTEL, OLIVIER GUÉNIAT, IS BOUND TO A ETHICAL VALUE CONFLICT WITH THE AUTHORITIES ESTEEM CERTAIN OBSERVERS
A criminal complaint was filed against those who make pressure on state employees so that they apply procedures which serve to by-pass in a grime way the respect for the fundamental rights (violation of article 35 of the Constitution).
170705DE_FG
TODAY, LEADERS OF THE POLICE ARE ENFORCED BY MAGISTRATES AND UNSCRUPULOUS MEMBERS OF AUTHORITIES TO APPLY PROCEDURES WHICH VIOLATE THE RESPECT FOR THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.
In this given context, May 15th, 2017, Olivier GUÉNIAT, a Police Leader, who was strongly engaged for the respect of Human Right, made the BIG JUMP.
The dysfonctionnnement of the Public Prosecution and the appeal in police forces to harass and to silence citizens had to remove any sense to his Life with his commitment for the respect of the fundamental rights.
He would have been a member of the leaders of the police who would not have supported that citizens are the object of a threat of arrest warrant because Me Claude ROUILLER, former president of the federal Court, could not defend publicly its report on the permanent denial of justice, disputed for its good faith.
170704DE_BT

170529BT_DE

170704DE_BT

170705DE_FG

30.06.17 PILOT PROJECT WITH THE PRESIDENT OF THE CRIMINAL FEDERAL COURT TO PROTECT VICTIMS OF DENIAL OF JUSTICE : BECOME A PROACTIVE JUDGE FOR THE RESPECT FOR THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS !
Daniel Kipfer, President of the Federal Court, has to give a strong signal to the Federal Council by paying of his pocket the expenses of judicial decision which is inequitable within the framework of the context of a denial of justice.
Furthermore he must require of Me Claude ROUILLER to clarify publicly the contents of his report on the permanent denial of justice, the good faith of which was disputed.
ME CLAUDE ROUILLER DISCREDITS ALL THE FEDERAL JUSTICE AND PUTS IN DANGER OF DEATH A FEDERAL COUNCILLOR WITH HIS REPORT ON THE PERMANENT DENIAL OF JUSTICE THE GOOD FAITH OF WHICH WAS DISPUTED
It is recommended to Daniel Kipfer to be proactive by asking to his colleague, the former President fo the TF, Me Claude Rouiller, to give some explanation on the contents of its report the good faith of which was disputed by professionals of the law and authors of the demand of parliamentary inquiry.
To remind to the state employees that they have to assure the realization of the fundamental rights in their decision, it is asked to Daniel Kipfer to pay of its pocket the expenses of a decision which would not exist if the fundamental rights would have been respected. This is a very strong signal on behalf of the President of the Criminal Federal Court for the magistrates and the state employees who do not respect in their decision the superior law. He must give the example that a decision which do not respect the fundamental rights is not applicable ( it is a denial of justice or violation of the obligation to respect the article 35 of the federal Constitution).
170629DE_DF
21.06.17 LP 18 COMPLAINT CLASSIFIED WITH A GHOST PROCEDURE CODE AND A MODIFIED OR DISREGARDED FEDERAL CONSTITUTION

The classification with a ghost procedure code is disputed
170621DE_CP

 

THE UPPER AUTHORITY OF SURVEILLANCE OF THE SERVICE OF PURSUIT REVEALS THAT THEY DO NOT APPLY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION
They do not have a lower authority of surveillance of the service of pursuit !!!

WHO ARE THE CONTRACTORS WHO PREVENT THEM TO RESPECT THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION AND THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS (art. 35) ?

How many citizens had their fundamental rights violated with this process ?

170523DE_CM

170601CP_DE

170621DE_CP

11.06.17 WHO ARE THE CONTRACTORS OF THE CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION WHICH CONTROLS THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE
The President of the Penal Federal Court answers that he knows that he cannot enforce the constitutional fundamental rights within the framework of crimes committed by members of the lawyer association.
It is asked to him to make public the names of the contractors which prevent him from respecting the guaranteed rights by the federal Constitution.
The federal Council is informed !
DANIEL KIPFER FASCIATI BROKE THE OMERTA MADE ON THE REQUEST OF PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY ON LAWYER ASSOCIATION AND THE REPORT OF THE FEDERAL JUDGE ME CLAUDE ROUILLER : HE AGREES WITH ME AD WHO SAYS THAT THE WORDS SERVE IN NOTHING MORE AND THAT ONE NEEDS THAT "A MAURICE BAVAUD" WHO BRINGS DOWN A FEDERAL COUNCILLOR TO RESTORE THE RESPECT FOR THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
Who sponsored Me Claude Rouiller to draft a report against the rules of the good faith to contradict the facts established with Me de Rougemont ? d2470
Who gave the order that Mr Erni's lawyer does not have the right to pronounce on this report while he had the mandate of it ?
Who gave the order to the federal Court to prevent Mr Erni's lawyer , which appeal for violation of the fundamental right, to pronounce on this report ? 160520RS_TF
Who are the contractors of such a criminal organization ?
Who prevents the federal Court from assuring the respect for the fundamental rights and who puts in danger a federal Councillor ?

051217DP_GC

d2470

160520RS_TF

170610DE_DF

02.06.17 NEW EXAMPLES OF ABUSES OF AUTHORITY MAILED TO PROSECUTOR FABIEN GASSER
Here is a question of Me AD which the criminal justice has to answer in order to be not compromised by abuses of authority of her members :
"Who is the contractor who made forbid that Mr Erni's lawyer can make photocopies of the file which he had to study ?"
IN APRIL 2016, Me AD HAD SAID THAT THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE IS UNDER THE CONTROL OF A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION
When Me AD discovered that Mr Erni's lawyer had been forbidden to photocopy the file for which it was appointed, he wanted to know the name of the contractor of this abuse of authority !
It is time for the magistrates, who are the defenders of the fundamental rights, to show to Me AD that the criminal justice is not under the control of a criminal organization !
So that the justice becomes again credible, Me AD is right, the contractors of abuse of authority have to be identified and punished !
The light has to me made on the identity of the contractors who ordered that the Professor Claude Rouiller drafted a report that he cannot support in front of professionals of the law !
170601DE_FG
26.05.17 THE FEDERAL COUNCIL ON THE HOT SEAT.
The dissident Lawyer, Me AD, is proved right in front of the LOWER AUTHORITY OF SURVEILLANCE OF THE SERVICE OF PURSUITS AND COVERY :
The procedure - which violates the fundamental rights and which should end in the death of a federal Councillor - must be applied.

Coming up next : This decision of the lower Authority of surveillance is the object of a Complaint in front of the Judicial Council for matters of common sense !

FINALLY AN AUTHORITY OF SURVEILLANCE OF THE SWISS JUSTICE RECOGNIZES THAT THE CONTROL OF THE SWISS CRIMINAL JUSTICE IS MADE BY A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION WHICH CAUSES A DISCRIMINATION OF A PART OF THE CITIZENS
Me AD showed brilliantly that the abuses of authority and the characterized denials of justice are used by the highest authorities of the country to violate the fundamental rights of a part of the population.
He showed that the criminal justice does not any more serve to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution but to protect the interests of a criminal organization. The latter sets up procedures to by-pass the respect of the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution.
THE LOWER AUTHORITY OF SURVEILLANCE confirms that the filing of a criminal complaint does not any more allow to protect the interests of the citizens, victims of abuse of authority. She confirms that the duty of a state employee is not to respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution but to apply the procedures which allow to by-pass the respect for the fundamental rights of citizens, victims of abuse of Authority. She confirms it by knowing that, in the context of the false expertise of Professor Claude Rouiller, Me AD made a commitment to make bring down a federal Councillor to end these abuses of Authority ! She confirms that Switzerland needs a new Maurice BAVAUD, as Me AD has explained it.

170523DE_CM

170523DE_FB

18.05.17 VALIDITY OF A TITLE OBTAINED WITH AN ABUSE OF AUTHORITY
The lodging of a criminal complaint for abuse of authority was deposited.
Test for showing to Me AD, that it is not necessary to shoot down a federal Councillor to end an abuse of authority committed by a member of the judiciary !
IN 1999, THE STATE EMPLOYEES OF THE PROSECUTION OFFICE HAD THE POWER TO INTERRUPT A RECOVERY PROCEDURE IF A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT DISPUTED THE LEGAL TITLE FOR ABUSE OF AUTHORITY (DENIAL OF JUSTICE)
According to Me AD, the state employees of the prosecution office have to obey a criminal organization today which does not allow them any more to respect the article 35 of the federal Constitution.
He advises to shoot down a federal Councillor to end the actions of the criminal organization !

170517DE_BT

170518DE_FB

170506DE_FB

10.05.17 ENGINEER'S SOLUTION PROPOSED AS ALTERNATIVE OF THE ONE PROPOSED BY THE LAWYER "AD" TO MAKE RESTORE BY THE AUTHORITIES THE RESPECT FOR THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION :
A criminal complaint is lodged with the PROSECUTOR FABIEN GASSER so that he enforces the supreme law by thoses who get used to abuse of their privileges and skills in their decisions by not respecting the article 35 of the Constitution. Facts noticed by several lawyers and lecturers in law quoted in the complaint.
THE LAWYER "AD" ADVISED AND WANTS TO SHOOT DOWN A FEDERAL COUNCILLOR SO THAT THE AUTHORITIES ENFORCE BY THE MEMBERS OF THE JUDICIAL ORDER THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN THEIR DECISION. HE GIVES SERIOUS INDICATIONS THAT THE JUSTICE IS UNDER THE CONTROL OF A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION IN THE STUDIED CASE
An engineer lodges a penal complaint againts criminal organization to ask a Prosecutor - who must have this ethics by its function - to enforce the fundamental rights within the framework of the instruction of this complaint.
The latter highlights privileges and unfair procedures used by people in charge of a task of the State to violate the fundamental rights (art. 35 violated).

Me AD can appreciate that there is now engineeer's alternative solution to his professional's solutions of master of the law to make restore the respect for the fundamental rights by the Authorities.

It remains to be seen whether Prosecutor FABIEN GASSER will prefer the solutions of the engineer to that of Me AD, a professional of the law.

170506DE_FB
03.05.17 THE PRESIDENT OF THE FEDERAL COURT, THE VICTIM AS CHILD OF SEXUAL ABUSE AND ABUSE OF AUTHORITY, IS INVITED TO END THE ABUSES OF AUTHORITY AND TO ENFORCE THE FUNDAMENTAL GUARANTEED RIGHTS BY THE SWISS CONSTITUTION

170502DE_DF

POLITICAL ACT : REFUSAL TO PAY AN INVOICE OF THE FEDERAL COURT DIRECTLY BOUNDED TO THE REFUSAL OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE TO HEAR THE VICTIMS OF ABUSE OF AUTHORITY AND TO ENFORCE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE SWISS CONSTITUTION
How DANIEL KIPFER FASCIATI, President of the Federal Court, is going to enforce constitutional fundamental rights of citizens, who are victims of abuse of Authority and abuse of power ?
Is Daniel a reliable person or a monster who turns a blind eye to the actions of the people without ethitcs which abuse of their power and their authority ?
Do we need a new Maurice BAVAUD to end the abuses of Authority used to cover acts of criminal organisation in Switzerland ?
170503DE_SS

170502DE_DF

170503DE_SS

26.04.17 FORMER PROSECUTOR PIERRE CORNU HAS DOUBTS THAT A CIVIL APPEAL ALLOWS TO MAKE RESPECT THE FUNDAMENTAL GUARANTEED RIGHTS BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION !
See part : 170330TC_DE

It is the job of the Federal Council, who holds a "hidden" recording showing that the False Contract and the false accusation were used to make some professional blackmail, to assure that the criminal justice works to enforce the guaranteed fundamental Rights by the Federal Constitution.
See part : 170424DE_SS

IT IS NOT ENOUGH FOR A MAGISTRATE TO FORBID TO PRONOUNCE THE TERM OF "FALSE CONTRACT", SO THAT THE "FALSE CONTRACT" BECOMES A VALID CONTRACT TO JUSTIFY THE RIGHT TO COPY A STOLEN NUMERICAL APPLICATION !

Me Christian BETTEX said that it was impossible to prove the false accusation with this "False Contract" where he forbade the unique witness of the false accusation to testify !

Me De Rougemont said that the behavior of the criminal justice was incomprehensible !

The lawyer of the GER speaks about a criminal organization who has the control of the criminal justice !

One hudge thank you to the unique witness of the false accusation who broke the silence and to the engineer who put his brilliant talent of hacker to put on listening of the tactless personalities.
Thanks to the lawyer of the GER to have intervened after the severly flawed mediation with Me Bettex, without our knowledge, one year ago !

170324DE_LM

170327LM_TC

170330TC_DE

170424DE_TC

170424DE_SS

20.04.17 SELECTIVE JUSTICE : THE FLOOR IS GIVEN TO THE PRESIDENTIAL CLERK TO MAKE STATEMENTS
Mr Ludovic FARINE

How to fight against obvious abuses of authority based on a selective justice ?

WHO CHECKS THAT THE CRIMINAL COURT PUNISHES THE OBVIOUS ABUSES OF AUTHORITY ?
Why an employee of the State decides to amend a category of citizens for a letter sent by ordinary post (mail B), which they did not receive within 10 days, while he knows that it is an obvious Abuse of Authority and that it is penal ?
Would this employee of State take the risk of amending Mr Ludovic Farine for the same cause, while he is a professional of the law ?
170414DE_TC
12.04.17 NOTICE OF SEIZURE: FILED COMPLAINT FOR A TITLE OBTAINED WITH A CHARACTERIZED DENIAL OF JUSTICE A LAWYER SAYS THAT THERE IS NO WAY TO FIGHT AGAINST A CHARACTERIZED DENIAL OF JUSTICE !
It has still to be proved !
Soon more information on this site and on the example quoted here !
170403DE_OP
02.04.17 INVESTIGATION AGAINST THE SWISS CREDIT : THE PROSECUTION OF THE CONFEDERACY IS ON THE HOT SEAT
THE EUROJUST EXCLUDES THE SWISS PROSECUTION OF AN INVESTIGATION CONCERNING A SWISS BANK
The whistle blowers cannot trust anymore the Swiss Justice. They contact directly the groups which want to get rid of the corruption. A new resistance is born ! It is the direct consequence of the denials of justice made by the SwissFederal Court.
Eurojust => 170401_24Heures
New generation of whistle Blower=> 170402DE_TP

MADAME SIMONETTA SOMMARUGA IS ALERTED ON TIME
The attitude of the leaders of the Prosecution abusing of their power is comparable to that of the leaders of the Institute MARINI. They remind the worst years of the Violation of Human rights by the Swiss leaders Class :
150329_la_liberté
170402DE_SS

LE FILM A TEMPS PRESENT

170402DE_TP

170402DE_SS

24.03.17 RED ALERT IN BERN ACTIVATED BY THE BEHAVIOR OF THE JUDGE LAURENT MARGOT
A document drafted by Laurent Margot could cost the Life to a federal Councillor according to the interview made in April 2016 with the lawyer Me le Confédéré Remarquable.
See part :170324DE_LM

If the judicial audiences were filmed, the Swiss must to be frightened by the functioning of their Courts, as observed it, in October, 2005 the Public witness of a judicial audience in this case treated by judge Margot
See part: 051217DP_GC

MADAM SIMONETTA SOMMARUGA IS ALERTED ON TIME.
See part 170324DE_SS

IN FEBRUARY 1997, Me JP MAIRE SPOKE ABOUT A MACHIAVELLIAN CASE, WITHOUT BEING ALLOWED TO GIVE MORE DETAILS
See part 970224JM_DE

IN APRIL 2016, 19 YEARS LATER, Me Le Confédéré Remarquable SPOKE ABOUT A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION !
For the Swiss, judge Laurent Margot shows that Me le Confédéré Remarquable, who is also a lawyer member of the GER, did not exaggerate when he speaks about criminal organization.
It is time that our elected representatives inquire on the report Rouiller "concerning the hidden right" which the TF wants to prevent from making public. It is time that they take
measures to restore the respect for the constitutional fundamental rights
See part : 170211DE_CF
See part : 170304DE_AF

170324DE_SS

170324DE_LM
970224JM_DE

15.03.17 BUG WITH THE FINANCIAL SERVICE OF THE FEDERAL COURT
(See point 08.11.16 below)
Request of a system of quality control to the Parliament for the Federal Court.
THE BUG CONTINUES WHATEVER THE POST CONFIRMED TO HAVE MADE THE PAYthe MENT

Inexplicable situation !
Are there state employees who misappropriate payments ?

170315DE_AF
08.03.17 NEW FACT: THE UNIQUE WITNESS OF THE FALSE ACCUSATION, FORBIDDEN TO TESTIFY BY THE OAV, AGREES TO TESTIFY IN A DIVERTED WAY.
Me François de Rougemont, mediating lawyer of the Big Council, had proposed a method to obtain the testimony of the unique witness of the false accusation in a diverted way, further to what the Court was forbidden to make the witness testify. This witness had been forbidden to testify by Me Christian Bettex to cover crimes committed by his colleague Me Foetisch using the links binding the OAV to the Courts.
170304DE_AF

This testimony shows the gravity of the act of abuse of authority of the President of the Tribunal Bertrand Sauterel with the Hidden Rights
170211DE_CF

ME CHRISTIAN BETTEX, STATE LAWYER, HAD ASSERTED THAT THE FALSE ACCUSATION COULD BE NEVER CONTRADICTED IN THE GIVEN CONTEXT WHERE HE HAD FORBIDDEN TO THE UNIQUE WITNESS TO TESTIFY.
Thanks to the unique witness to have agreed to testify in a diverted way to contradict a lie which served to make do 21 years of unfair procedure and create millions of damage with the relations binding the OAV to the Federal Court. Thanks to Me De Rougemont to have proposed this diverted method.
It is now a question to the Members of the Federal Parliament of not agreing with the lawyer which says that the Hightest Authorities of the Country do not want any more to respect the guaranted fundamental rights by the Constitution and that is necessary to shoot down a federal councillor for restablishing the respect of these Rights !
A criminal complaint was deposited in Bern so that the professionals of the law - included the federal judges there who did not respect the constitutional fundamental rights in their decision - are condemned and so that the Confederacy turns around against them for the damage which they caused !
It is not because the federal Assembly did not plan neutral Courts to judge the crimes committed by Presidents administrators of company, who are lawyer OAV, that the judges can violate the fundamental rights by the federal Constitution in their decision !
170304DE_AF

170304DE_AF

170216DE_JS

01.03.17 FEEDBACK OF THE COMPLAINT SENT TO THE PARLIAMENT.
An internet user announces that a lawyer, OAV member, blew the whistle ont the major dysfuctions of the Swiss Courts.
See : 170301DE_IG
THANKS TO THE PRESS TO HAVE BROKEN THE OMERTA ON THE ABSENCE OF SYSTEM OF CONTROL OF DECISION-MAKING BY JUGES.
The President of the Parliament with the members of Parliament are informed about this analysis made by a confirmed lawyer.
see 170301DE_JS
It's time that the members of Parliament end the selective system of justice. It would be in compliance with the Values of the Constitution that the Press give a voice to the Victims of this Selective System of Justice and that it follows the processing of the complaint ! 170211DE_CF

170301DE_JS

170301DE_IG

21.02.17 Let us identify the members of Parliament who do not want to enforce the GUARANTEED FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS BY OUR CONSTITUTION !
Let us be vigilant! Let us not let members of Parliament lie us and betray a part of the citizens with the HIDDENT RIGHT!
Certain elected representatives confuse the federal Constitution with some toilet paper to wipe their ass. They forget that they were elected by promising to make it apply !
Let us force them to reveal their double game! Let us not let them destroy the Live of a part of the citizens by betrayal!
Let us not let lawyers give privileges to their brotherhoods as the Member of Parliament, Me PHILIPPE BAUER, did it, to see : 170216DE_JS

170216DE_JS

170211DE_CF

17.02.16 COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS WITH THE HIDDEN RIGHT
It is requested from the Federal Council to end the selective system of Justice which denied a part of the citizens to see justice done !
THE MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT SET UP A HIDDEN RIGHT WHICH GIVES ACCESS TO A SELECTIVE JUSTICE
If we apply this hidden rights to our elected representatives, according to the rate applied by the President of The Court Bertrand Sauterel :
The one who would kill a member of Parliament with a hired killer would be responsible for a damage which is not upper to the amount which he had to pay to the hired killer, that is 25000 CHF.
Did you know it ?
It is only the headland of the Iceberg of the hidden right, to read the complaint for more details.170211DE_CF
170211DE_CF
04.02.17 PERMANENT DENIAL OF JUSTICE OR HIDDEN CODE OF PROCEDURE
Judge Meuwly did not yet indicate the law which allowed him to violate the constitutional fundamental rights in his decisions. See example of December 12th, page 2, in mail sent to the State of Council:
170122DE_MR
After deciding by his own on the application for his recusal, see:
161212JM_DE
161229DE_JM
the Juge continues to take decisions violating the guaranteed rights by the Constitution 170204DE_MR
IS THERE A HIDDEN CODE OF PROCEDURE WHICH RESTRICTS THE SCOPE OF THE GUARANTEED RIGHTS BY THE CONSTITUTION ?
To our knowledge, there is no elected representative who received a fine of 400 CHF for a mail B, which was not notified to him within ten day ! (which is an arbitrary procedure)
To our knowledge, there is no elected representative who was obliged by a Court to pay an invoice for a mandate which a lawyer refused to honor invoiced with a price list which was not announced!
160126DE_JM

President of State of Council, Maurice ROPRAZ is invited to handle this permanent denial of justice which violate the equality before the law ! Because, state employees and Courts respect the fundamental rights in their decision for the elected representative but not for the other citizens !
170204DE_MR

170204DE_MR
23.01.17 QUESTION: WHERE MAY I FIND THIS LAW?
160126DE_JM
Answer of the magistrate : you must make en appeal to obtain the answer !
170104JM_DE
The President of the State Council is informed
170122DE_MR
THE PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL OF STATE HAS BEEN INVITED TO ENFORCE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN RESPONSE TO THIS ANSWER OF THE MAGISTRATE !
Let us hope that President of State Council of Fribourg will be pleased to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the Constitution by the Fribourgeois magistrates !
170122DE_MR
For the moment, it is the lawyer of the GER that is right on all the line ! But, perhaps others lawyers will propose others ways to enforce the fundamental Rights, that the way to shoot down a federal councillor !
170122DE_MR
11.01.17 WHAT DO KNOW THE FEDERAL COUNCILLORS ABOUT ME BETTEX ACTS ? WHAT DO THEY WANT TO DO REALLY ?
Do they know that the relations which bind brotherhoods to the courts are used to violate fundamentals rights ? Are they ready to be shoot down for violating the constitutional fundamental rights ?
CITIZENS CONSIDER THAT THE FEDERAL COUNCILLORS DO NOT KNOW THE ACTS OF ME BETTEX FOR DESTROYING THE SWISS DEMOCRACY AND THE INTERVENTION OF THE LAWYER OF THE GER FOR SAVING THE SWISS DEMOCRACY!
Amazingly, none of them pronounced on the reproaches of refusing to enforce the fundamental rights, which makes them the lawyer of the GER.
A mail of control is sent to them through Mrs Simonetta Sommaruga to check if their silence means that they do not want to respect any more the fundamental constitutionals rights !

170110DE_SS

161010DE_SS

02.01.17 CALL FOR RESISTANCE
A judge is invited to recuse himself rather than to violate the article 35 of the Federal Constitution!
See part 161229DE_JM
IT IS NOT BECAUSE THE AUTHORITIES DO NOT WANT TO RESPECT ANYMORE THE CONSTITUTIONAL FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS THAN THE MAGISTRATES CAN VIOLATE THE ARTICLE 35 CSTE IN THEIR DECISION
If tomorrow a federal Councillor is shot down, because persons in charge of the task of the State violate the article 35 cste : these persons will be liable !
161229DE_JM
2017 2017 Target

Obtain from the Authorities that they take measures to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.

To unmask the people in charge of a task of the State which violates the respect of the fundamental rights in their decision.

Theme of the Year 2017 : (call for resistance)

The lawyer of the GER said that the words are of use to nothing more in front of Authorities which do not want to respect anymore the constitutional fundamental rights, it is necessary to act, then :

"Let us act to force the Authorities to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution ! "

Let us require that the Authorities criminally prosecute the persons in charge of a task of the State who do not respect the article 35 cste.
Let us require the transparency on the members of lodges who ordered Mr Penel Murder !

 
2017 HAPPY NEW YEAR
****************
Thanks

 

 

 

Best Wishes to all the readers for a good Health.
***********************************************************************
Thank you to everyone who dared to denounce the dysfunctions of the justice in 2016, in spite of the reprisals exercised by the Authorities.
One big thank you also to all those who act in the shade to fight against the dishonesty of some of our politicians and members of our Authorities !
Thank you in particular to those who allow the publication of this site.
Thank you also to the lawyer of the GER to have chosen to defend the respect for the constitutional fundamental rights rather than the privileges of the brotherhoods and of the members of the lodges, which are at the origin of the dysfunction of the Courts.

Sohn von Tell

 
2016 THE YEAR 2016 IN REVIEW On April 7th, 2016, the Weekly magazine "HEBDO" made public that the swiss justice was paralyzed by delirious procedures...
It raised the problem of the new code of procedure which doesn't allow to respect the guaranteed rights by the federal Constitution.

Hebdo of April 7th 2016

Shortly before, on March 22nd, 2016, Me Christian Bettex, lawyer of the State of Vaud had explained that there was no division of powers between the brotherhoods of lawyers and the Courts.
In the name of the Vaud Parliament that he represented, Me Bettex asserted that members of parliament did not want to respect anymore the fundamental right "to be heard". He asserted that the federal Court which is not independent of his brotherhood of lawyers would agree with him.

A few days later, a dissident lawyer confirmed the words held by Me Bettex. He revealed that a citizen M. Penel would have been poisoned (murdered) by a member of lodge to grant Me Foetisch of the penal prescription.
This lawyer questioned directly the responsibility of the members of the Federal Council, who do not want to respect any more the constitutional fundamental rights.
He revealed the existence of a group of ethics of resistance which is going to make surgical strikes to end the dysfunctions of the justice attributed to the Federal Council. The murder of Mr Penel by the highest Authorities or our Country is not acceptable for him.
This group wants to make bring down a Federal Councillor in order to obtain that the Authorities respect again the fundamental guaranteed rights by the Federal Constitution.
If the federal Councillors restore in time the respect of the fundamental rights, their objective will be groundless.

In this order of idea for ending the violation of the fundamental rights by the Authorities, other citizens has launched a petition to obtain the implementation of a supervisory board of the justice.

SIGN THE PETITION HERE !

In summary, the dysfunctions of the justice become transparent and their origin has been identified :

" It is the highest Authorities of the country who do not want to respect anymore the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution."

Sohn von Tell

 
28.12.16 ACCORDING TO RULINGS SET UP BY THE FEDERAL COURT, a judge asserts that :
The judges of a Court can refuse to recuse themselves and it even if they are involved in an affair of organized crime involving lawyers where the absence of independence of the Courts violate the Constitution rights and should provoke the death of a federal Councillor.
See part 161226DE_JM

It is certainly neither Me Bettex nor Me Rouiller who will contradict this judge!

THIS EXPLANATION GIVEN BY THIS JUDGE SHOWS THAT THE RULINGS OF THE FEDERAL COURT DO NOT ALLOW TO RESPECT THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.
It allows to understand why the lawyer of the GER recommends to shoot down one federal Councillor for restoring the respect of the constitutional rights.
We must observe that the Federal Court substitutes itself to the Parliament by implementing such Rulings which allows to by-pass the respect for the fundamental rights for covering organized crime.
Mme Simonetta Sommaruga will be informed about the situation which concerns the federal Council.
It is obvious that contrary to Mr Penel, who was murdered for this dysfunctioning of the Federal Court, the federal Council has the competence to enforce the guaranted fundamental rights by the federal Constitution. It only needs to implement rulings with an efficient control for assuring that magistrates respect in their decision and in the set up of Rulings the article 35 of the federal Constitution. It is a requirement of our nation already written in the Constitution !
161226DE_JM
25.12.16 THOUGHT OF CHRISTMAS:
What happened to the almighty God of The Constitution?
GOD of the CONSTITUTION
Why a lawyer advises to bring down a federal Councillor to restore the guaranteed fundamental rights by the Constitution ?
Who is the Great Master or obedience - who doesn't want to respect any more the constitutional fundamental rights - that the federal Councillor serve ?
Constitution
21.12.16 THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT WANTS TO KNOW IF THE MURDER OF PENEL IS A THREAT ONLY FOR THE FEDERAL COUNCIL OR FOR HER TOO !

Nobody can answer instead or the GER, but we can make observations on known elements.
161220DE_TB

ANSWER: THE MURDER OF P. PENEL PUTS IN DEATH DANGER ALL THE CITIZENS WHO ASK FOR THE RESPECT FOR THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS BY THE AUTHORITIES:
LOGICAL OBSERVATION : The intervention of the lawyer of the GER, after Me Bettex prevented Mr Erni from being represented by his lawyer in front of the Parliament, suggests that Me Bettex would know not only the person who was at Mr PENEL home the day of his death, but also those who appointed her to poison Mr Penel !
De facto situation : The lawyer of the GER considers that the Federal Council is responsible for this murder. According to him, Mr Penel would not have been murdered if the federal Court had to assure the respect for the fundamental rights in its decisions. It would be the federal Council who closes his eyes on this major dysfunction of the Federal Court. In practise the Rulings of the Federal Court do not enforce the respect of the fundamental rights but in contrary allow priviledged persons to violate the fundamental rights.

 

161220DE_TB

12.12.16 I DID NOT RESPECT THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN MY DECISION, BUT YOU CAN APPEAL
With this incredible comportment, the President of the Court agrees on the Content with the lawyer of the GER who says that the Authorities do not want to respect any more the fundamental rights.
161201TB_DE
ACCORDING TO THE LAWYER OF THE GER, IT IS A PENAL COMPORTMENT AND AN APPEAL HAS NO SENSE !
At least, each can understand how unfair people assuming a state task can use the Courts to by-pass the respect for the constitutional fundamental rights.
It also explains why more and more state employees are threatend by unsatisfied citizen !

161211DE_TB

161201TB_DE

161128DE_TB

161129DE_TB

161211DE_TB

02.12.16 ANSWER AT THE APPLICATION FOR RECUSAL OF THE COURT :
To answer the request, ADRIAN URWYLER, President of the Cantonal Court, asserts that according to the code of procedure : It is a Judge of the Court for whose recusal is requested to take the decision,....it is a vicious circle !

To each citizen to read the parts in detail in their context for making its own opinion on this Kafka's answer !

See 161128TC_TB

IN EACH TO APPRECIATE THE REDUCTIO AD ABSURDUM HELD BY THE LAWYER OF THE GER WHICH SHOWS THAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT CANNOT ENFORCE THE RESPECT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS WITH THE CURRENT CODE OF PROCEDURES :
He asked the quite logical question, see 161128TC_TB page 4:

Do you think that the professional of the law would take the risk of breaking the law if they had the slightest risk of being condemned by the Courts while the law plans it ?

When we hear on the radio that President of council of the judiciary says that the judges are overwhelmed :
161123RTS_INFO
.....with such a code of procedure which allows the professionals of the law to violate the respect of the constitutional Rights by knowing that they do not risk to be condemned, each can understand that the number of disputes explodes and overloads the judges.

How come that a lawyer dares to overload a Court to charge a service that he refused to make and for whom he had not announced the price ?, see 161125DE_TB page 3. He would have been good that ADRIAN URWYLER explains this typical case !

Corollary : the lawyer of the GER says basically that it is the criminal Court which are malfunctionning !

161116DE_TB

161128TC_TB

30.11.16 40 000 CHF OF EXPENSES GRANTED BY THE COURTS AND A TERRIBLE SWORD OF DAMOCLES ON THE FEDERAL COUNCIL

You have to read it to believe in it !

See part 161129DE_FB

20 YEARS AGO, ME FOETISCH HAD ANNOUNCED THAT THE FEDERAL COURT WILL GRANT HIM THE PRESCRIPTION FOR HIS CRIMES WITH THE PRIVILEGES WHICH BIND HIM TO THE COURTS.

See PART : 160921DE_JS

Will be the next victim of Me Patrick FOETISCH be a federal Councillor ?

ALEA JACTA EST !

161112DE_TF

161129DE_FB

27.11.16 DETERMINATION OF THE JUDGE MEUWLY ON THE APPLICATION FOR ITS RECUSAL BOUNDED TO THE PERMANENT DENIAL OF JUSTICE BASED ON THE HIDDEN RIGHT LINKING LAWYERS TO THE COURTS.

"Explanation of the Judge" to be appreciated by each according to the parts :
" In this given context, the code of procedures doesn't allow the Judge to respect the constitutional fundamental rights !"

See part : 161125DE_TB
Context : 051217DP_GC
and part :2203

IN 2013, THE LAWYER PATRICK GRUBER REFUSED TO ACCEPT A MANDATE CONCERNING CRIMINALITY COMMITTED BY LAWYERS WITH THEIR PRIVILEGES BINDING THEM TO THE COURTS
HE ASSERTS BEING ENTITLED TO FEES FOR THIS REFUSED SERVICE WITH A PRICE LIST WHICH HE DID NOT ANNOUNCE. HE REQUESTED THE PAYMENT OF HIS INVOICE BY COMMAND TO PAY AND RELEASE REQUEST !

The Courts has validated the Request of the lawyer, although no code of procedure accessible to the citizen, to our knowledge, can justify this privilege given to the lawyers by the Courts to send an arbitrary invoice. (It is a hidden Right and a privilege reserved only for lawyers) !

In each to wonder if a Court would give to a plumber, (as they do it for a lawyer), the release for the payment of a Service, which he refused to give, invoiced with a price list that he did not announce, required by command to pay ?
=> There is hidden Right wich binds lawyers to the Courts which violates the constitutional fundamental rights. The main violation is the access to a neutral and independent Court !
For more details, to read : 161125DE_TB

161111TB_DE

161125DE_TB

22.11.16 APPLICATION FOR RECUSAL OF ALL COURTS
The impartiality of judge is a necessary but not sufficient condition to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the Constitution
161118TB_TC
WHY DOES A LAWYER ADVISE TO SHOOT DOWN A FEDERAL COUNCILLOR TO OBTAIN THE RESPECT FOR THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION ?
ANSWER (trivial observation): It is because the codes of procedures to not oblige the Courts to respect these rights and do not allow to respect them within the framework of a permanent denial of justice => This lawyer considers most probably that the Federal Council doesn't assume its responsabilities !
161120DE_TC

161111DE_TB

161118TB_TC

161120DE_TC

18.11.16 VIOLATION OF THE RESPECT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS BY THE FEDERAL COURT REQUIRES THAT ALL COURTS WITH POSSIBILITY TO APPEAL TO THE FEDERAL COURT RECUSE THEMSELEVES
Who would agree to be fined with 400 CHF, because he did not receive a mail "B" in time ?
TODAY, STATE SERVICES USE THE FACT THAT THE FEDERAL COURT DOES NOT RESPECT THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS TO CONSTRAINT CITIZEN TO DO UNFAIR PROCEDURES.
If the appeal to the Federal Court dysfunctions, all the other Courts do not have the means anymore to enforce the guaranteed rights by the Constitution in case of denial of justice. All the Courts have to recuse themselves in order to oblige the Parliament and the State Council to take corrective actions before a federal councillor will be shoot down as advises a lawyer !
Everyone can consult the case here and appreciates the request which requires that the complete Court recuses itself when we are fined for a mail that we did no receive in time!
161111DE_TB

161112DE_TF

160625DE_EJ

161019DE_FO

161019DE_EJ

161111DE_TB

14.11.16 THE FEDERALE JUDGE CHRISTINA KISS GIVES BY JUDGMENT THE GREEN LIGHT TO THE GER TO SHOOT DOWN A FEDERAL COUNCILLOR
See part : 161112DE_TF
This choice could be invalidated by the federal Council by taking on time measures to restore the respect for the guaranteed rights by the Constitution.
VENI, VIDI, almost VICI, THE ANALYSIS MADE BY THE LAWYER OF THE GER IN APRIL 2016 IS 100% CONFIRMED BY THE JUDGE KISS
Me Foetisch won all the battles with its relations who binds him to the federal Court! See top of page 5 part :160819RS_TF
On the other hand, so tomorrow the GER makes shoot down a federal Councillor, the judgment annotated of Christina KISS (see part 161112DE_TF) will allow every citizen to understand the necessity of this death wanted by the TF in order that the Authorities restore the respect for the Constitutional Fundamental Rights by the Courts.
Me Foetisch and his colleagues, who won all the battles by abusing of their relations which bind them to the Courts - will have lost WAR as predicted by the lawyer of the GER !
The commitment of ethics taken by the GER in April, 2016, gives to the federal Councillors the possibility of restoring the respect for the constitutional fundamental rights by another way. The choice is in the hands of the federal Council.
In the meantime, Mme Christina KISS with her crazy judgment has been recorded by the GER.

161003DE_IG

160914DE_TF

160909DE_IG

160929DE_TF

161016DE_TF

161112DE_TF

08.11.16 BUG WITH THE FINANCIAL SERVICE OF THE FEDERAL COURT
Payment in advance not received by the Federal Court.
161103TF_DE
BOYCOTT OR DELIRIOUS PROCEDURES IN ALL STATE ADMINISTRATIF SERVICES.
After that a mail notified by courrier B didn't arrive in the deadlines, it is a payment in advance for the Federal Court, which isn't received within the deadlines.
Cabale, boycott or bad luck?
... or prediction confirmation of the GER Lawyer given in april 2016 on the method used by the underworld for destroying a citizen ?, see page 3 "de l'importance du dossier pour eux" part: 161003DE_IG
Mail office must clarify this mysterious bug : 161104DE_OP
161105DE_TF
07.11.16 FINE OF 400 CHF WITH A DELIRIOUS PROCEDURE :
The Service of the Contributions give a fine of 400CHF to whose do not receive a mail notified by "courrier B" within the dealines to be able to reply within ten days.

161105DE_JM

ARBITRARY AND UNFAIR PROCEDURE FOLLOWED BY THE GER
A notification by registred mail costs 6 CHF: it is shocking to see that the service of the contributions allows to give a fine of 400CHF to the citizens who didn't receive a mail on time for respecting a deadlines of ten days, because they did not receive on time the mail, which was notified by "courrier B" instead of registered mail.
After Me Patrick GRUBER found the Goose that lays the Golden Eggs in the personality of Judge MEUWLY - the latter judged that the lawyer could charge a service which he had not given with a price list which had not announced - the Service of the Contributions wants to take advantage of it. 161031DE_JM
Only inconvenient, the state employee who call on the Goose that lays the Colden Eggs will be recorded by the GER because they violate in a grime way the rights guaranteed by the Constitution (art. 35 cste).
They discredit the justice by means of denial of justice to validate arbitrary and unfair procedures. According to the rules of the good faith, this behaviour is an abuse of power and an act of constraint. It is a penal behaviour !

161105DE_JM

161031DE_JM

 

02.11.16 TWO LAWYERS WENT TO WAR FOR FIGHTING DENIALS OF JUSTICE
The President of the State of Council, Erwin Jutzet, lawyer, is called now for backup
161101DE_EJ
IN 2005, ACCORDING TO THE LEGAL RIGHT, A JUDICIAL EXPERTISE SHOWED A DAMAGE CLEARLY UPPER TO THE MILLION FOR THE VIOLATION OF THE COPYRIGHT,
ACCORDING TO A HIDDEN RIGHT, THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT DECLARED THAT THE DAMAGE WAS SMALLER THAN 4000 CHF.

In 2005, A FIRST LAWYER signs a request for a parliamentary inquiry to clarify the existence of this hidden Right. In 2007, he testifies in presence of Me François de ROUGEMONT, mediating lawyer of the Vaud Parliament.
In 2016, the question not being still clarified, A SECOND LAWYER, member of the GER, advices to shoot down a federal Councillor for ending the use of this hidden Right !
QUESTIONS :
Who gave the order to the judge to say that the damage was not upper to 4000 CHF?
Is it the same person who gave the order to murder Pierre Penel ?
Which role played Me Christian BETTEX in this murder ?

ANSWER : How to end the hidden Right which binds lawyers to the Courts ?

051217DP_GC

161101DE_EJ

161031DE_JM

31.10.16 JUSTICE DENIED :
Erwin Jutzet, President of State Council has been consulted to end the violation of fundamental rights with denial of justice
The JUDGE BENOÌT MEUWLY HAS BEEN RECORDED BY THE GER:
The lawyer of the GER considered that the behavior of the Judge Meuwly in the case of the false accusation with the behavior of the lawyer Patrick Gruber should be published !.
Now, it is done ! He risks reprisals as all those who do not respect the fundamental rights in their decision.
P. Penel murder is an alarm bell which shoul be not ignored !
161031DE_JM
21.10.16 WHO HAS MUDERED P. PENEL ?
Penel
ACCORDING TO A LAWYER, P. PENEL WAS MUDERED FOR INSURING THE PENAL PRESCRIPTION TO Me FOETISCH
The killing order could have come from the Federal Court Relation of Mr Foetisch
At the Question "why don't you have appeal to the federal Court" which asks M. Frédéric Oberson,
See part 161019DE_FO
The answer is that the Federal Court is not independent as the analysis of the lawyer of the GER shows it.
The refusal to examine a complaint can hide a murder.
See part 161019DE_IG
It is the job of state of council to respect the federal rights
See part :161019DE_EJ

161019DE_IG

161019DE_FO

161019DE_EJ

18.10.16 THREAT AND CENSORSHIP AGAINST LAWYERS
Proposed solution : The Federal Court must find a Pearl
See part : 161016DE_TF
UNFORESEEN SITUATION: NO LAWYER FOR DOING AN APPEAL!
April 2016 : the dissident lawyer said :" "you cannot imagine the means which they can use against you ! " :
See part : 161003DE_IG
We believed to have already seen most of the means :
See part : 16101DE_IG
He was right ! We haven't imagine the Threat and censorship of lawyer
1) see :160914DE_TF
2) see :160916TF_DE
3) see : 160929DE_TF MAIL DESCRIBING THE HIDDEN LAW
4) see : 160930DE_TF
5) see : 161003DE_TF
It is worst that all we could imagine, but there are solution, which we test here for our readers
6) see : 161016DE_TF
161016DE_TF
11.10.16 HIDDEN LAW : Criminal complaint for abuse of authority deposited against the Delegate General Prosecutor Ruedi MONTANARI to insure the safety of the FEDERAL COUNCILLORS and others citizens !

See part : 161010DE_SS

THE DELEGATE GENERAL PROSECUTOR Ruedi MONATANARI puts in danger of death the federal Councillors and citizens by having wanting to hide the existence of the HIDDEN LAW.
He should ask himself on the Values of his confreres

Me Christian BETTEX
Me Dominique SCHUPP
Me Yves BURNAND
Me Philippe RICHARD
Me Claude ROUILLER
Me Philippe BAUER
All prostrated in front of their Saint President Foetisch among whom the Values are see part : 16101DE_IG
We invite Ruedi MONTANARI to answer to the questions of the Chamane, see page 3 point 1.1 complaint : 161010DE_SS

161010DE_SS

16101DE_IG

04.10.16 HIDDEN LAW : SUCCESSFUL DEMONSTRATION BRILLIANTLY
Président Foetisch

In 1995, President Administrator had announced that there was a hidden Law linking the OAV to the Courts which would allow him to commit crimes with complete impunity !
He just brought the proof brilliantly by obtaining the prescription thanks to this hidden right. It is the State of non-Law
We make this case public as recommends the Remarquable Confederate who can act with other means that we.
The case is not closed.
We also inform Mr Pierre-Yves Maillard who as head of state allows the OAV to use this hidden law to despoil citizens.
1) see :160909DE_PM
2) see :160914DE_TF
3) see :160916TF_DE
4) see : 160929DE_TF MAIL DESCRIBING THE HIDDEN LAW
5) see : 160930DE_TF
160929DE_TF
03.10.16 MISSION ACCOMPLISHED :
Publication of the interview with the Remarkable Confederate, so strange as the one who has taken place with Me Bettex, on March 22nd 2016
DOES ME BETTEX KNOW THE REMARKABLE CONFEDERATE ?
When and how will act the Remarkable Confederate for restoring the fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution ?

161003DE_IG
01.10.16 AN UNEXPECTED JUDGMENT OF THE FEDERAL COURT THE FEDERAL COURT REFUSES TO MR ERNI THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED BY HIS LAWYER IN FRONT OF THE VAUD COUNCIL
REMINDER:
May 20st, Appeal of the lawyer to Federal Court :160520RS_TF
June 20 st: Appeal For defending his client rejected:160620TF_RS
August 19 st: Federal Court jugement revision requested:
160819RS_TF
September 29st: Revision rejected: 160929TF_RS
It is an unexpected results which confirms the analysis of the dissident lawyer that the Autorities don't want anymore to respect Fundamental Rights. His proposal is to shoot a Federal Councillor if the Federal Court don't allow you to be represented by your lawyer.
160929TF_RS
26.09.16 ALERT : PUBLIC MINISTERY OF CONFEDERATION PUTS IN DEATH DANGER ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES AND A FEDERAL COUNCILLOR THE ALERT IS CHARGED 2000 CHF BY THE PENAL FEDERAL COURT
Exemption is required as it is lawyers who want to shoot the elected representative by violating in a dirty way Values of the Constitution. An other issue is the lack of independance of the Penal Federal Court !
If tomorrow a federal Councillor is shoot by a Maurice Bavaud, new national heroe, as a lawyer recommand it for saving fundamental rights, nobody could say that the arlert wasn't given.
See letter to Federal Court : 160923DE_TP
and wake-up Call to Federal Council: 160921DE_JS
The family of the deceased and all citizens will be able in a document of about 1500 caracters to discover in detail the motivation of the MPC on the appeal and its VALUES which lead him to sacrifice a federal Councillor in order to restore the fundamental rights guaranted by the Constitution.
Appeal :160905DE_TP
Motivation request: 160907TP_MP
MPC motivation : 160908MP_TP
160923DE_TP
22.09.16 WAKE-UP CALL OF THE FEDERAL AUTHORITIES :
After the wake-up call for respecting the form exerted by Mr Comte, It is now the wake-up call for respecting the content which is first priority for the EPF engineers.
FEDERAL COUNCILLOR IN DEATH DANGER : WAKE-UP CALL OF THE FEDERAL COUNCIL REQUESTED BY AN EPF ENGINEER
The wake-up call for the dressing of the deputees is still not sufficient to make the EPF engineers smile.
See Newspaper 24 heures of Septembre 14th: 24733988

The key objective is now to wake-up call the deputees who don't want to respect anymore the fundamental rights of the Constitution.
See WAKE-UP CALL : 160921DE_JS

By chance, the President of the Swiss Confederation is an EPF engineer. Much mor than everybody, he knows the Values of the Oath of Archimède. He is able to the defend the Values of the engineers in front of the Lawyer who recommand to shoot a federal Councillor for restoring the fundamental rights !
See OATH OF ARCHIMEDE : Serment_ING_EPF

160921DE_JS
19.09.16 PUBLIC MINISTERY OF CONFEDERATION MOTIVATES HIS JUDICIAL ORDER WITH 1500 CARACTERS ACCORDING TO WORD COUNTER! TO READ IT ABSOLUTELY !
Everyone should think about what we expect from respectful magistrates of the VALUE OF the Swiss Constitution !
Complaint :160628DE_MP
Judicial Order: 160816MP_DE
Appeal :160905DE_TP
Motivation request: 160907TP_MP

MPC motivation : 160908MP_TP

160908MP_TP
15.09.16 RESPECT OF THE VALUES OF THE SWISS CONSTITUTION : FEDERAL COURT PUT ON THE ALERT FOR A VITIATED APPEAL WITH A HIDDEN CONDITION!
After that the lawyer of the appellant learned that the trial was vitiated with a hidden condition involving Me Foetisch Brotherhoods in the contract, he decided not to appeal.

The appellant informed the Federal Court about this situation bound to this hidden condition.

See part 160914DE_TF

The President administrator of the company, Me Foetisch, takes advantage of the prescription for the violation of a contract. He was able to commit this violation thanks to a hidden condition linking his lawyer brotherhood to the Courts.
The appellant makes notice to the Federal Court, that he would never have signed a contract with Me Foetisch, if the latter had indicated in the contract the hidden condition : " as he was a lawyer, he was protected by the relations which bind his brotherhood to the Courts and he could commit crimes in full impunity with this protection.

The appellant reminds that there is a penal complaint against criminal organisation. He reminds also that a dissident lawyer considers that words were of no use in front of authorities which don't want to enforce anymore the respect of fundamental rights as show this trial vitiated since 21 years with a hidden condition. This lawyer considers that Switzerland needs a "Maurice Bavaud" to shoot a federal councillor to retore the fundamental rights.
160905DE_TP_recours

According the the respect of the Values of the Constitution, the key point is that without this hidden condition, The President administrator, lawyer, couldn't commit his crime with the privileges which are binding his lawyer brotherhood to the Courts !

It is time that the Federal Council call to order the members of the Parliament to end the organized crime committed with the privileges of lawyers brotherhood !

160914DE_TF

160909DE_IG

11.09.16 FOR EXCEPTIONAL THREATS / EXCEPTIONAL REQUESTS :
1) State of Council P.-Y. MAILLARD invited to take measures to prevent that Mr Foetisch benefits of the prescription for a trial severly vitiated,
see URL :160909DE_PM

2) The federal Councillor, S. Sommaruga invited to identify the freemasons at the origin of the false accusation in Yverdon trial,
see URL:160909DE_SS

IF THE WORDS WERE OF NO USE IN FRONT OF AUTHORITIES WHICH DON'T WANT TO ENFORCE ANYMORE THE RESPECT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS:
The proposal of the dissident lawyer - to shoot a federal Councillor to restore the fundamental righsts" - is not a unique solution.
To inform the stakeholders, which have the power to act and who show that they are attached to the respect of the fundamental rights, is a more constructive solution. It allows the elected representatives to show their real commitment for the respect of the constitutional fundamental rights.

See URL :160909DE_PM , message to Mr Maillard

See URL : 160909DE_SS , message to Ms Sommaruga

 

 
08.09.16 INTERNET USERS TAKE A STAND ON THE VALUES OF THE PROSECUTOR

Thank you for this feedback which leaves the appelant again stunned !

A) GENERAL PROSECUTOR IS ACCUSED TO PUT IN DANGER THE SAFETY OF THE SWISS
Charge against him are given by former Federal Prosecutor, Felix Reinmann :
Michael Lauber prevents the complaint processing of case involving organised crime... It could explain why the members of the criminal organisation "Réseau OAV", of whom is part the lawyer of the State of Vaud, can commit crimes with complete impunity with the Protection of the General Prosecutor :
It belongs to each to appreciate how the MPC prevented the processing of the complaints by reading elements exposed in the appeal : 160905DE_TP_recours

See also URL : http://www.tdg.ch/suisse/violentes-critiques-procureur-general/story/27151294
(in case of censorship : 27151294)

B) THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR OF THE CONFEDERACY WOULD ALSO BE ACCUSED OF PERJURY ACCORDING TO AN ARTICLE WHICH AN INTERNET USER COMMUNICATED US
See URL : http://www.lematin.ch/suisse/procureur-extraordinaire-enquetera-lauber/story/18315514
(in case of censorship :18315514)

Thanks to the internet users to open eyes to our fellow countrymen on the Values of The General prosecutor and those who elected him.

The law on the spying intelligence and wiretapping should only foresee cameras and microphones in Prosecutors office to assure the Safety of Switzerland and not protect the activities of criminal organisation. Real danger comes from MPC who prevent to process complaint against criminal organisation.
Records taken in a Prosecutor office with hidden microphone should be published!

 
07.09.16 WHICH ARE THE REAL VALUES OF MICHAEL LAUBER, LAWYER, GENERAL PROSECUTOR OF THE CONFEDERACY AS WELL AS HIS GENERAL STAFF Reminder, on June 28th, 2016 a criminal complaint was put down against criminal organization further to what a dissident lawyer suggested use a hired killer to enforce the guaranteed constitutional rights by the Constitution.

To see complaint text, click here : 160628DE_MP_PLAINTE

After a thorough examination of the facts of the criminal complaint, the general prosecutor and his general staff consider that the behavior of their colleagues lawyers is not a matter of the penal. He agrees with the dissident lawyer.

See motivated judicial order of the General Staff of the general prosecutor of the Confederacy after the thorough examination that they made of the contents of the complaint :
To see judicial order text, click here : 160816MP_DE_ordonnance

This decision contradicts the criminal law taught by university professors to the EPF engineers, the President of the Confederacy, who is EPF engineer, is called to witness.
To see letter sent to the President of the Confederacy^, EPF engineer called to witness, click here: 160905DE_JS_Temoin

Further to this decision of the General prosecutor which has enough to worry the EPF engineers who expect from the Prosecutor and from his General Staff that they respect the right taught to the Engineers, an appeal was put down with the Federal Criminal Court of Bellinzone.

To see appeal text, click here : 160905DE_TP_recours

The appellant believed that it was a joke, when a dissident lawyer explained him that the words were of no use in front of Authorities which do not want to enforce any more the constitutional fundamental rights, it was necessary to use a hired killer.
Apparently, it was not a joke. This lawyer is a visionary. It is necessary to notice that for the citizens attached to the Respect for the constitutional Values, the General prosecutor and his General staff represent a threat for the protection of the VALUES of the SWISS, but a chance of a lifetime for the lawyers which work for the criminal organizations.

Me De Rougemont, mediating lawyer of the Parliament, had explained that an atheistic prosecutor without morality, as some freemason are, is not afraid of killing citizens because he does not believe in the devil and the punishment after the death. To kill is also normal for him as for a Jihadiste.
Soon there will be a danger of the OAVISTE (= Member of the OAV Network) which will use the new law on the spy intelligence and wiretapping to commit crimes with complete impunity :

ACCORDING TO THE ABOVE PRESCRIPTION, THE VALUES of the GENERAL PROSECUTOR AND HIS GENERAL STAFF ARE THE ONES OF CITIZENS ATHEISTS, WITHOUT MORALITY, WORKING FOR CRIMINAL ORGANIZATIONS => It is necessary to forbid to elect atheistic Prosecutors, without morality who belong to secret societies.

Thanks to the Internet users and dissident lawyers to break the OMERTA on this discovery which leaves the appellant completely STUNNED and speechless !

As the Prosecutors will be the users of the law on the spying intelligence and wiretapping, thank you for warning the Swiss of this risk hidden for the voting!
The voting on the law on the spying intelligence and wiretapping is going to be polluted with this discovery! The law on the spying intelligence and wiretapping will be under the control of the criminal organizations and will help them to commit crimes with full impunity !






160628DE_MP

 

 




160816MP_DE





160905DE_JS






160905DE_TP

29.08.16 Violation of the right to be heard According to Me de Rougemont, Parliament mediating lawyer, members of the Vaud Parliament choose to be killed to violate the right to be heard.
This incredible case is brought before the Federal Court. This Court should oblige members of parliament to respect the right to be heard.
see part 160819RS_TF

The Press is invited to launch a debate on the respect for the Values of our CONSTITUTION by judges atheists
see part 160829DE_IG

160829DE_IG

22.08.16

1st SIGNIFICANT RESULT"

A VIP RAPIST OF THE VALUE OF THE SWISS CONSTITUTION MADE VISIBLE : HUDGE SURPRISE, HE IS THE STATE LAWYER AND USES THE STATE POWER TO PROTECT A PRIVATE CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION.

RESULT WITH CHILLING DETAILS

Me Bettex, a state representative lawyer reveals the existence of a criminal organisation bounded to the State. Main issue, he is an executive member of this criminal organisation. This organisation should provokes slaughters according to Me François de Rougemont. Several of his members could be elected representatives. Among them, there would be freemason atheists who do not respect the Values of the GOD of THE SWISS CONSTITUTION.

A criminal complaint has been filled again the lawyer and the criminal organisation

complaint

18.04.16 The Press breaks finally the omerta on the slippage of the swiss judicial system. The Newspaper "L'HEBDO" of April 7th, 2016 gives alarming figures:
According to the Genevan lawyer Jean-Cédric Michel, about 100% of the users of the swiss judicial system are dissatisfied with it.
It is a dismal and major failure for the political world which does not any more manage to enforce the guaranteed rights by the Constitution.

One solution exists for solving this issue :
Mme Michèle HERZOG has just launched a petition to end these slippage of the swiss judicial system.

Save the SWISS VALUE, sign here the petition : click here

Petition
13.01.16 Respect for the Constitution and computing attacks
Since December, we have to regret that hackers crashed two computers of members of our network containing strategic data for this site !
The damage caused by this IT war delay the publication and the debate on the disloyale election of Me Philippe Bauer
This attack also delays the publication and the debate on the behavior of Mrs Kaelin Murith which is the object of a criminal complaint too !

We cannot exclude that the authors of the these computing attacks are the same one that those made censror the site "doublefaces.net"

One year ago, in front of terrorist attacks, we said " I am CHARLIE".
Today, in front of these attacks to violate the constitutional laws, I say : "I am SWISSTRIBUNE"

Sohn von Tell

 
 

2016 TARGET

Learn from year 2015 :

" MAKE VISIBLE THE RAPISTS OF THE CONSTITUTION"

To engage a debate with the members of the Authorities concerned by the Violation of the Values of the Constitution.

Allow our readers to ask questions to our leaders on the respect of the Values of the Constitution in complete safety without risking of reprisals.

Theme of the Year 2016:


"LET US MAKE TOGETHER VISIBLE THE RAPISTS OF THE VALUES OF THE SWISS CONSTITUTION"

...let us hail publicly those who do not respect the Values of the Constitution

 

...let us express ourselves publicly in complete safety with avatars in front of those who impose their power by using censorship and threats of reprisals

 
2016 HAPPY NEW YEAR
****************
Thanks

 

 

 

Best wishes to all the readers for a good HEALTH !
***********************************************************************
Thank you to everyone who fought in 2015 for the respect of the Values of the Constitution, among which the freedom of expression and the protection of private data.
One Big Thank you also to all those who act in the shade to fight against the dishonesty of some of our politicians and members of our AUTHORITIES !

Sohn von Tell

 
2015 THE YEAR 2015 IN REVIEW The site content strongly disturbed the members of the underworld to the point that they forced the host to break the hosting contract of swisstribune.org in an anonymous way.

The defenders of Human Rights and freedom of expression allowed the swisstribune.org site to survive by finding him a respectful host of the Values of the Swiss Constitution. It is a big STEP on the Internet in the fight against censorship and the manipulation of citizens by top Swiss leaders and Underworld Members.

BCV Bank ends its year with a fine of 50 millions to be paid to USA. She would not have had to pay this fine if the Swiss Authorities and her leaders would have respected the Values of the Swiss Constitution.

The disloyal election of the national Councillor Philippe Bauer shows that the elections are falsified by the power of the underworld ....we elect members of Parliament who manipulate us and who deceive us thanks to the power of the underworld. They work for private interest against the Values of our Nation !

The partei of the Greens speaks of lodging a complaint against the Authorities which do not respect the will of our nation expressed in the federal Constitution....

.....the disloyal election of Philippe Bauer is only the ICEBERG peak of a general malaise in front of the dishonesty of some of our elected representatives who betray the Values of our Nation !

NUMEROUS READERS THANKED US AND ENCOURAGED US TO PURSUE THE DEBATE ON THE VIOLATION OF THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION BY OUR AUTHORITIES !

Sohn von Tell

 
31.12.15 Discover the letter sent by Pythagore on December 16th to the national Councillor Philippe Bauer
Philippe BAUER hasn't yet answered to this letter !
In case where the national Councillor, Philippe Bauer, gives no answer to his letter, Pythagore has requested that the letter is published on the site www.swisstribune.org
Pythagore suggests two others actions against the law of silence exerted by the national Councillor Philippe BAUER, one of them is a complaint, see d2565.
- the letter is now published according to Pythagore request !
- for information, the case of disloyal election has already been brought in front of a swiss criminal court. Detailed will follow soon on this website !
d2565
  Scared to be registred ? Securely communicate without registration ===> click here d2566
08.12.15 Censorship of doublefaces.net and disloyal election of the national Councillor Philippe Bauer
The code of Silence broken by Cedric.

Thanks Cedric to have broken the unfair silence of the national Councillor Philippe Bauer !

Cedric makes troubling revelations on the actions of the Masons in Switzerland.
Violation of the constitutional fundamental rights revealed in the public request of a parliamentary enquiry (see d311) and the disloyal election of Philippe Bauer is the work of politicians Masons who act in an anonymous way. (see also Voldemort)

For our safety and to limit the power of the Masons, Cedric recommends to sign the referendum voir d2564

If facts revealed by CEDRIC are incomplete, we invite the National Councillor PLR Philippe Bauer et the Masons to use the right of reply !

d2564
18.11.15 Why did Friedrich Leibacher commit suicide?
Why young Muslims radicalize them to commit suicide in Paris?

At the origin, there is a violation of the VALUES OF THE LIFE and ABUSES of INFLUCENCE by WORLD MASTERS. These Masters are IMAMS and POLITICIANS who, by their silence and power of influence, encourage the suicides.
They should be forced to take their respective responsibilities !

Among them, there is a SWISS NATIONAL COUNCILLOR OF THE PLR, PHILIPPE BAUER, ONE OF THE GREAT MASTERS OF THE SWISS UNDERWORLD LAW or CENSORSHIP !

For those who are not ready anymore to pay the price of the suicides, IT IS TIME TO BREAK THE SILENCE ON THE ABUSES OF INFLUENCE OF IMAMS AND POLITICIANS WITH DOUBTFUL VALUES who violate by their behavior the VALUES OF THE LIFE:
It is easy to say: " I am CHARLIE", and then to do nothing !.
For the Islamic World, IMAM MASTERS, who take refuge behind the SHARIA rather than to fight the radicalization of their young believers are at the origin of the suicides.
For Swiss citizens, Politicians MASTERS, who take refuge behind the underworld law (or censorship law) rather to fight against the violation of the VALUES of the Swiss Constitution are at the origin of Friedrich Leibacher's suicide.....
It is time that the POLITICIANS and the PRESS break the silence on the actions of the WORLD MASTERS who do not respect the VALUES of the LIFE.
For those who feel concerned : do not say I am CHARLIE, but show that you apply the VALUES OF CHARLIE and respect the Values of the LIFE
Demand openly that IMAMS MASTERS and POLITICIANS MASTERS, with doubtful Values, end their behavior at the origin of these suicides ! Break the silence ! see exhibit d2562
d2562
13.10.15 EDITORIAL Nr 2
"Censorship and disloyal federal elections
"The erasing of the Hard disk has started... "
New method of censorship, which is a shame of an election campaign. We wait on answers for the respect of the constitutional fundamental rights. Censorship is not a loyal answer !
Ed002
12.10.15 SILENCE GIVES CONSENT
Are we going to have a Traitor of "Bernard MADOFF" Style in the Parliament ?
Censorship and deceit in the federal elections
Mr Damien Humbert Droz, President of neuchâtel PLR and Mr Philipp Müller, President of the Swiss PLR are invited not to repeat the errors of the past.
The voters have the right to know, before the elections, how the candidate PLR, the Grand MASTER Philippe BAUER, is the defender of CENSORED PRACTICE WHICH MAKE THE PUBLIC SHIVER !

d2542

d2543

06.10.15 The Great Lawyer Master, Me Bauer, has joined the VW engineers with his deceit in the federal elections ! What is the difference between the use of a secret logiciel to deceive the citizen (VW case) or the use of censorship to deceive his electorate ?
There is no differences. Both methods hide data for deceiving the citizens. After that VW engineers must clarify their deceit with a secret logiciel, Me Bauer must clarify his deceit with censorhip for protecting lawyers from the Swiss underworld !
d2540
28.10.15 Deceit in the federal elections
Bailli des temps modernes

The lawyer Bauer, the PLR candidate for the National council with the double hat, takes advantage of the censorship of a Website to mystify his electorate.

GCN=Neuchâtel Parliament

FSA=Swiss Federation of lawyers

Gessler = Baiiff who violated the rights of Guillaume Tell (Swiss history)

The violation of the Freedom of expression could lead to the disloyal election of the PLR candidate, the lawyer Bauer, for the National Council, with the deceit of the Swiss citizens on his real Values of ethics
The opposite image comes from the " www.doublefaces.net" site which presented both faces of the lawyer Bauer. The provider of this site - further to a secret complaint coming most probably from powerful Swiss politicians - has broken the hosting contract for the site.
Neither Me Bauer, nor those who threatened the Provider asked for the right of reply on the facts presented on the site.
The Truthfulness of the facts was not disputed ! The facts are simply censored !

Further to this censorhip, sorry for the readers who cannot be informed on the real Values of ethics of the lawyer Bauer.They will not be able to appreciate how Me Bauer mystifies them during its electoral propaganda with its network of relation to the Big Council. They will not know that he is as the Pilot of Germanwings who did not inform his passengers on his real Values of ethics
This deceit cost them the Life!
In this case, further to this censorship, Me Bauer was invited to present its real Valeurs to the Swiss citizens, see exhibit d2500. He did not make it.
The President of the Neuchâtel PLR and the President of the Swiss PLR were informed about this electoral deceit based on the Violation of the freedom of expression and the right of the voters to be loyally informed.
A confrontation with Me Bauer was requested from them, see exhibit d2536 and d2537. It was also requested from them to withdraw the candidacy of Me Bauer because his Values are not compatible with the duty of fonction of an elected representative at the Parliament.

d2500

d2536

d2537

26.06.15 Unusual discovery : the secret of the FSA President
A reader let us know that the President of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers has a bigger secret to hide than the one of the President of FIFA
The Lawyer who get from the Federal Court the jugement which allow the lawyers to commit crime in full impunity with the protection of the Federal Court is other than the President of the Swiss association of Lawyers.
Thank you to this reader, who revealed this incredible secret. It shows that the separation of powers doesn't exist.
After Sepp Blatter, it is time that Me Dominique Schupp gives publicly explanations !
d2506
20.06.15 Swiss Constitution Value Respect and particularly art. 30 cste
Identity Control of the elected representatives of the big Council of Fribourg having received a falsified or distorted file.
The President of the Committee of justice required within 10 days to confirm the identity of 7 elected representatives.
For avoiding any error of people, the identity of every elected representative who had in hands the file concerning the crimes committed with the privileges which bind the lawyers to the federal Court (see exhibit 2501) is verified (see exhibit 2504). On the ethical plan, every elected represntative who doesn't want to be associated with the organized crime and with the forgery or denaturation of file will be able to act with full knowledge of the facts.
d2504

d2501

12.06.15 Was there forgery or denaturation of a file at the big Parliament of Fribourg ?
The President of the committee of justice invited to clarify this issue.
Further to the complaint lodged with the Parliament of Fribourg (exhibit d2495), a mail of the President of the Committee of the justice (exhibit d2498) could question the ethics and loyalty of some of our elected representatives or officials (exhibit d2503)
For each of us, Fribourgeois and Swiss citizens, to acquaint with these exhibits for appeciating the loyaty and ethics of our elected representatives
The candidate of the PLR for the National Council, Philippe Bauer, at the origin of this case of violation of the constitutional rights is cordially invited to give some explanation on this site.
This is a matter to follow closely for the credibility of our Swiss institutions.
d2503

d2498

d2495

02.06.15 Swiss Parliament Candidate
The PLR party proposes a candidate who destroys the VALUES of our Democracy
Is it necessary to set up a code of morality for the Swiss Parliament Candidates which the Party PLR proposes ?
After the charges of espionage against the Councillor Ms Markwalder of the PLR and the good resolutions of the head of the party, it is amazing that the Party proposes as Candidate for the national Council, the lawyer Philippe Bauer.
Either the members of the PLR do not know the Hidden VALUES of Philippe Bauer and the way he violates the Values of our Constitution, or they want to deceive the voters !
For each of us to discover on this website the Hidden VALUES of Philippe Bauer and the abuses of power which he commits to cover with the organized crime committed by his colleagues with the lawyers secrecy and the protection of the Courts.

To elect Philippe Bauer, it is to give up the respect for the guaranteed fundamental rights of our Constitution, it is to have Courts helping Philippe Bauer colleagues to commit crimes in full impunity ! (article 30 cste violation).

d2500
25.04.15 EDITORIAL Nr 1
"Censorship and procedural misappropriation"
SWISSTRIBUNE.ORG VICTIM OF AN ANONYMOUS ATTACK BY WHOSE WHO VIOLATE THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION :
ONE BIG THANK YOU to the defenders of the humnan rights, who have the courage to accommodate and protect those who denounce the violation of human rights and in particular the Freedom of Expression !
Thanks to them swisstribune.org was not able to be censored by the Underworld!
The courage is not to say :
" I AM CHARLIE", but it is to take the risk of defending those who fight for the respect of Human Right

THANK YOU AGAIN IN THOSE WHO HAVE THESE VALUES OF ETHIC.

Sohn von TELL

ED001
08.04.15 Follow up with the BCV direction Wrong Security established with fundamental Rights Violation not yet reimbursed
A complaint deposited for Constitution Rights Violation and a tentative of censorhip to be clarified.
d2496
08.04.15 150 dead of the A320 of Germanwings mentioned as example to lodge a complaint againts judiciary procedure abuse At the instigation of the President of Council of State, a complaint is deposited to the Parliament for enforcing the constitutional fundamental rights
A comparison of the power abuse of the pilot of Germanwings made with the power abuses of the state employee to motivate the complaint.
d2495
01.04.15 Proposal of a law anti-corruption by the Member of the council of State to the Fribourgeois Parliament It will have been necessary to wait for April Fool's Day so that the Member of the Council of State Erwin Jutzet act with his skills.
Better than never, let us hope that it is not an April fool, but the will of President of council of State to respect the guaranteed Rights by the federal Constitution.
d2492
27.03.15 Fundamental Rights guaranted by the Constitution violated by the BCV procedures State Councillor Etat Erwin Jutzet makes the commitment to answer the mails which depends on its skills. According to him gangster's procedures of the BCV depends on Parliament skills.
This Kafka's observation confirms that the criminality committed with gangster's procedures of banks uses gaps of the Swiss law. Each understands that lawyers should not be ables to use the relation which bind their brotherhood to the Courts for committing crimes with complete impunity. The legislator planned nothing to fight against this shape of terrorism of state based on the secret of lawyers and the protection of the federal Court.The employees of the BCV take advantage of it to despoil their customers with these gangster's procedures and the cover of the federal Court.
d2491
04.03.15 Security obtained with the violation of article 30 of Swiss Constitution Criminality committed with screen lawyers : Councillor Erwin Jutzet informed about the violation of the guaranteed Constitutional fundamental Rights by the BCV.
The Member of the State Council of Fribourg, Erwin Jutzet, made attentive that the employees of the BCV use its silence to justify the violation of the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution.
The role of the State of Council is to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the Constitution. Without respecting this duty, the State of Council makes a denial of democracy !
To underline that the non-respect of his duty by the Sate of Council doesn't allow the BCV to justify the financing of Security obtained with the violation of the article 30 cste. BCV has to respect the Swiss highest Law.
d2482
02.03.15 Pascal KIENER, CEO of the BCV, kept informed of the unfair practice of his bank employees Jean-Claude Roch, former administrator of the BCV, enjoyed the protection of the screen lawyer Yves Burnand in the case of an economical crime committed with a monstrous process !
Today, Pascal Kiener will have to show for this criminal case how his bank respects the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution.
To underline that at present time, Bradley Birkenfeld is heard by the French Justice on the methods used by banks to violate the rules of the good faith. His testimony doesn't allow anymore the legal departments of the banks to be credible. It is the duty of the bank Directors to assure the respect of the rights guaranteed by the CEDH and the Constitutions !
d2480
20.02.15 Explanations of the BCV employees Apparently,Pascal KIener didn't receive the mail d2474
As Raoul Weil, Pascal Kiener is not informed by his employees on the procedures and the bank requirements organized to violate the Constitution !
d2476
17.02.15 Banque BCV The employees of the Bank call upon legal requirements to violate the Swiss Constitution and cover crimes committed with screen-lawyers against one of their customer. It is state terrorism methods which remind the gangster methods used in USA !
It is cunning to call upon legal requirements to violate the Swiss Constitution, but it is impossible ! A legal requirement which violates the federal Constitution cannot be legal by definition !
A formal notice has been given to the CEO of the Bank, Pascal Kiener, for ending these gangster's methods of his employees. If necessary, help will be required from American senate which knew how to convince the BCV headquarters to deliver to USA the name of their potentially dishonest employees !
d2474
03.02.15 Deborah, who is not "one CHARLIE", testifies of its fear in front of the actions of the Swiss Authorities Is it necessary to kill the Children of the Federal Councillors for getting the respect of the Constitutional Fundamental Rights ?
The Lady who is not Winkelried (see d2463) observes that Micheline Calmy-Rey acts as the jihadists, see d2471. She supposes that the death of family members of federal Councillors could make them break the OMERTA on the violation of Human Rights by the Federal Council for covering crimes committed by the Swiss underworld, see d2466.
A moving testimony in front of unworthy actions of federal Councillors. See also d2464
d2471
       
08.01.15

LET US NOT GIVE IN TO THE BLACKMAIL OF THE FEAR TO GIVE UP THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND THE FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION

LET US ARREST AND LET US CONDEMN THOSE WHO EXERCISE TERRORIST ACTS TO REIGN WITH THE LAW OF THE SILENCE BY VIOLATING THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

D. Erni

Je suis Charlie
       
2015

2015 TARGET
To end the law of silence exercised by the Authorities on the crimes committed with the brotherhoods of lawyers with the Swiss Courts.

To enforce the constitutional fundamental rights by the magistrates (article 35 cste)

Best WIshes for a good health and a lot of success for all whose are fighting against the law of silence and the violation of the fundamental rights by those who hold the power.

Sohn von Tell

 
2014 THE YEAR 2016 in REVIEW

The site was visited by more than 1000 unique visitors.
Other cases of violation of the constitutional fundamental rights by the relations which bind the brotherhoods of lawyers to the Courts have been announced.
Around thirty testimony on the violation of the fundamental rights where commnicated to us.

The law of the silence exercised by the AUTHORiTIES frightens the readers. They are afraid of economic reprisals if they express themselves publicly. The freedom of expression don't exist anymore in Switzerland.

The mail of the Lady, who is not Winkelried, D2463 reflects a general feeling of the readers in front of the Authorities.

Readers wishes that other cases of violation of fundamental rights are published.

 

Sohn von Tell

 
31.12.14 Micheline invited to break its silence on her traitor of oath. Arthur was understood ! Micheline Calmy-Rey owes explanations to the Swiss nation on her oath breaking to respect the federal Constitution.
Micheline Calmy-Rey established a gangster's procedure so that lawyers can commit crimes with complete impunity with the protection of the federal Court and the violation of article 30 cste.Without corrective action from her part, the matter could discredit Swiss government and impact its relation with Bruxelles !
d2466
25.12.14 Erwin Jutzet invited to break the code of silence on the crimes committed with the State power We are not any more in 1941. The role of the Council of State is not to establish the law of the terror for allowing lawyers to strip the citizens with the power of the state
Erwin Jutzet invited for Christmas to reveal himself and to show his Values and his commitment for the respect of the fundamental rights in front of crimes committed by lawyers with the judiciary power and the relations which bind them to the federal Court

d2465

d2464

15.12.14 Two readers are fighting for the respect of fundamental rights Thanks to the two readers who sent by mail the address of Micheline Calmy-Rey.
Thanks to the LADY, who is not "Winkelried" for her very warmfull message, see part D2463. For those who want to look forward to Micheline Calmy-Rey commented report of July 6, 2011, click here. For the complete text, see part d1003
D2463
09.12.14 Arthur, a reader, fights for the respect of fundamental rights We look for Micheline Calmy-Rey's address so that she has the right to be heard according to Arthur's invitation.
Micheline Calmy-Rey et Claude Rouiller will be invited to express themselves on this site on the respect of the fundamental rights and their actions in this respect.
( For information, M. Jutzet has not taken yet the measures for respecting the rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution)
D2462
24.11.2014 Erwin Jutzet
Erwin Jutzet
State Councillor+ Lawyer
A lawyer let us know that Mr Erwin Jutzet is a qualified lawyer. He is the right person to deal with the case.
The respect of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution is the responsibility of the State Council according to this lawyer. Mr Erni has only to apply for the respect of his fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.

Thank you for the information and the advice ! The warranty cas has been announced to the state Councillor, lawyer !

Answer resquested within 10 days !

D2461
20.11.2014 Johan Rochel, one of the guest of INFRAROUGE takes position The debate on the application of the Swiss nation decisions is a fundamental question.He don't like the debate formulation
M. Erni observes that the important is to answer the questions. The debate formulation is based on the study of a case of dysfunction of the Swiss democracy. It is a method encouraged by the standards ISO 9001-2008.
D2457r1
16.11.2014 UDC Initiative : two answers of the "Infrarouge" guests UDC initiative is a necessary condition to make apply the decisions of the people but it is not a sufficient condition for getting the application of these decisions.
Rules of "NO-RIGHT" exist in Switzerland. It is the Parliament responsibility which don't check that decision of the people are applied!. We are waiting on the answers of the other guests of "INFRAROUGE"
d2457
08.11.2014 UDC Initiative : to make apply the decision of the people How to make apply the decisions of the people with the code of silence exercised by the Authorities on the criminality committed with screen lawyers
It is the question asked to the guests of the TV_program "INFRAROUGE" of October 28th, 2014. Guest list :
Director of Amnesty International : Mme Manon Schick
Socialiste national Councillor : Mme Cesla AMARELLE
UDC National Councillor: M. Yves Nidegger
UDC Corporate Secretary : M. Kevin Grangier
Geneva Uni Professor:Jean-Francois Perrin (adresse manquante)

P.S. We are still waiting on the answers of Mr. Kolly see d2448 and of FSA President see d2428

D2451
d2452
d2453
d2454
06.11.2014 The state Councillor Erwin Jutzet deals with one issue of mails According to article 85 of state Constitution, Court implementation is the responsibility of Parlament.
This answer don't deal with the issue of fundamental rights respect of the Federal Constitution. To be followed.
d2460
31.10.2014 According to art.30 Constitution Mr Kolly has the right to answer as a private person Federal Court cannot forbid federal Court President to answer as a private person. He must do it for ethics reason
The respect for the democratic decisions of the people has to be applied before the locking procedures of the Federal Court which allow lawyers to commit crimes with gangster method.
d2448
30.10.2014 State Councillor E.J. Informed about art.9 violation by Mr Kolly
The resignation letter of the Federal Court President violates obviously the article 9 of the federal Constitution.
The Swiss nation has never allowed the Courts to apply occult legal rules. The member of the Council of State, Erwin Jutzet is informed about this nasty violation of the constitutionnal fundamental rights by the Federal Court. Violation of the article 9 of the Constitution.
d2449
29.10.2014 Fundamental Rights Respect:
Federal Court President resigns

 

Thunder Boom: Federal Court President send his letter of resignation for respecting Constitution Fundamental Rights
We remind that we asked to the Federal Court President to indicate where was the rule that : a Presiding judge cannot make testify a witness (screen-lawyer) who was forbiddon to testity by a lawyer brotherhood, see part d2429 . Nobody will know the answer. Within the time delay, Federal Court President sent his letter of resignation for the respect of the Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Swiss Constitution.
d2447
28.10.2014 Crimes committed with the power of Swiss Courts :
Explanations of the Pursuits Chamber of The State Court are followed to The State Council of Fribourg see part d2438
According to the Pursuit Chamber of the State Court, responsibility of Fribourg Authorities is involved see part d2445:
It is the Council of State, which have the competence to enforce the respect of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution.
He has to confirm that illicit debt obligations obtained with criminality committed with the power of Courts (article 30 cste violation) are not valid !

d2446

d2445

23.10.2014 Fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution violated with the lawyer brotherhood rules and with the Swiss Ethics Code of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers (FSA): Mr Erni refer this matter to the State Council of Fribourg which is competent to enforce the respect of the article 30 of the Swiss Constitution. Mrs Cindy Gachet acted to obtain the payment of a Illicit Title of Justice obtained with a procedural swindle committed with a double hats (see d2442).
Did Prosecutor Raphael Bourquin want to protect Mrs Cindy Gachet? See part d2436 . Would the latter one be only the Victim of a hudge caballe organized by several top leaders of Switzerland for covering criminality committed with screen lawyer and with the rules of lawyers brotherhoods. (Gangster methods)
Everybody can discover here with the State Council of Fribourg : the rules of the lawyer brotherhood and the Ethics Code of the Swiss Federation of lawyers used here to commit the crimes with screen lawyer....
As soon as the State Council would have enforced the respect of article 30 of the Constitution, more information will be given !
FSA members are welcome to take position on this website on these gangster methods! see contact

d2443

d2442

13.10.2014 Forgery in the Titles made with the Swiss Code of Ethics of the Swiss lawyer Federation (gangster methods):
Prosecutor Raphael Bourquin put the cart before the horses !
Article 30 cste violation : The Swiss Constitution guaranteed the access to a neutral and independent Tribunal.
This condition was required to judge the criminal complaint lodged against Mrs Cindy Gachet and other persons who has used the power of Courts for obtaining the payment of a Forgery in the Titles made with the Swiss lawyer brotherhood rules of the Swiss Federation of lawyers" (gangster methods), see part d2381.
While the precondition for the article 30 cste was not filled, Prosecutor Raphael Bourquin has taken a decision which is has not the right to take.
As a party involved in the trial, his judgement can only forget the violation of fundamental rights at the origin of this forgery in the Titles
d2436
15.10.2014 Anonymous intervention of a lawyer on the postmail sent to the President of the FSA The publication of the case on the Internet is worthfull:
After taking cognizance of the mail d2428, a lawyer specifies that there is a Swiss code of Ethics on the site of the FSA: click here. Thank you for this useful information for Mr. Erni.
Everybody can draw his conclusions on the Fixed Price Rate of honorary applied by Me PG! see d2420.
Now, we are waiting on the answer of the President of the FSA, for drawing our conclusions.
d2437
13.10.2014 Federal Court President, Gilbert Kolly, invited to confirm the existence of one hidden rule of right, which violate the fundamental rights warranted by the Constitution Violation of the fundamental rights warranted by the Constitution:
Does the rule really exists which says that a Court President cannot make testify a screen lawyer, who was forbidden to testify in writing by a brotherhood lawyer.
d2429
13.10.2014 President of the Swiss lawyer Federation is invited to confirm the existence of two hidden rules of right, which violate the respect of the fundamental rights. Violation of the fundamental rights warranted by the Constitution:
Does the rule exists really which says that a Court President cannot make testify a screen lawyer, who was forbidden to testify in writing by a brotherhood lawyer.
Me Gruber applied a fixed Price of honorary for a refusal to take a mandate, validated by a judge. Is this price respectful of the ethics principle of the Swiss lawyer Federation.
d2428
09.10.2014 Fundamental Rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution honored by UBS who protects the fundamental rights of his customers. These same rights are violated by the BCV. UBS and BCV have been made aware of the violation of the fundamental rights of their customer with Titles resulting from crimes committed with screen lawyers and the complicity of the federal Court.
UBS has blocked the monney in order to protect the fundamental rights of his customer and to avoid to be complice of criminality commited with screen lawyer.
BCV violated the fundamental right of his customer guaranteed by the swiss Constitution. Behind this forgery in Title is a violation of the general guaranteed procedures of the Swiss Constitution by the former President of the federal Court, Dr Claude Rouiller
...to be followed
d2426
08.10.2014 Crimes committed with the Power of the Courts :Pursuit Chamber of the State Court gives a complement of explanation to the position taken by State Councillor Erwin Jutzet Crimes committed with the power of Courts ( art. 30 cste violation), see part d2414r :
Responsibility of Fribourg State could be involved. According to the the pursuit chamber, it is the For Legal of the decision which allows to determine the responsibilities.
d2438
06.10.2014 Requirement of respect of 30 article of the Constitution. Mr Erni appealed against the decision fo President of La Broye Court in favour of Sir Patrick Gruber. The appeal is send to the State of Council for having an independent Court. Article 30 Cste Violation. Mr Erni wants to know why :
" A Court President cannot make testify a screen lawyer, who was forbidden to testify in writing by a brotherhood of lawyer, while he knows that only the testimony of this screen lawyer allows to prove the innocence of a citizen wrongly accused and to avoid him millions of damages".
It was all the stake of the mandate that Patrick Gruber refused to honor. The last one is welcome to give an explanation on this website. Here, IT IS FREE OF CHARGE, everybody pays what he wants to pay depending on its satisfaction !

D2421

d2420

01.10.2014 President of La Broye Court, Jean-Benoît Meuwly don't want to know, why Patrick Gruber invoices a mandate which he refused to honor September 26th, 2014, Mr Erni received this decision of the President of La Broye Court. We underline here that the decision is dated of July 15th, 2014. We observe that the seizure has already taken place while legal appealed delay are not yet exhausted. Apparently the victims of crimes in Switzerland committed with screens lawyers are treated by all the Courts in a arbitrary way. Article 9 cste violation. It is the reason why we are publishing all this case on Internet. If a Court President wants to give some explanation on this site, his is welcome. WE EMPHASIZE HERE THAT IT WILL BE FREE OF CHARGE! d2418
30.09.2014 The Council of State is invited to respect its function duty to guarantee the constitutional fundamental rights Article 30 cste violation : The Council of State is made attentive that the Prosecution is obliged to observe the code of silence on the relations which bind him to the brotherhoods of lawyers. The Prosecution cannot act for this case which did not plan the legislator.
It is time for the Council of State to take measures for enforcing the constitutional fundamental rights of the victims of crimes committed with screen lawyers and the violation of the article 30 cste
d2419
28.09.2014 The Prosecution breaks its silence to be even more silent Article 30 cste violation: we waited that the Prosecution takes measures to protect the interests of the victims of crimes committed with screen lawyers and the violation of the constitutional fundamental rights. For reminder, click here.
The code of silence is applied.
Nobody will know why Patrick Gruber charges a mandate which he refused to honor.
d2417
28.09.2014 The chamber of the office of the pursuits invited to repair the damage according to the instructions of the Member of the Council of State Erwin Jutzet Article 30 cste violation: the Fribourg Councillor Erwin Jutztet said to contact the chamber of the pursuits for obtainning the repair of the damage caused with the violation of the article 30 cste by the office of the pursuits. Independently of the repair of the damage, the Council of State must still enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the Constitution. He has to forbid offices of pursuits to make seizures for claims stemming from criminal activities committed with screen lawyers and the protection of the Courts. State of Council made the Oath to respect the Constitution. They will betray their Oath if they do allow the criminality committed with the violation of the article 30 cste. d2414
27.09.2014 The Office of the pursuits says that he is obliged to violate Human Right guaranteed by the CEDH Article 30 cste violation: the office of the pursuits reply to the questions. It is forced by the Courts to violate the constitutional fundamental rights for covering criminality committed with screen lawyers or violation of article 30 cste. For reminder, here are the questions (click here) which had to be answered by the Office of pursuits. d2416
25.09.2014 The warning bell given to UBS following the Human Right violation by Prosecutor Pierre Aubert The power abuse of Prosecutor Pierre Aubert will not be ignored. UBS is not ready any more at present time to finance a contested claim committed with a screen lawyer and an audition with Human Right violation, without documentary evidences! d2415
23.09.2014 Serment du Président No one is a prophet in his own land ! After his function duty oath to respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Swiss Constitution and his successful results abroad for the respect of human rights, the President of the Swiss Confederacy, Didier Burkhalter, is informed about his biggest and most difficult challenge in Switzerland :
"to end the violation of Human Fundamental Rights by members of its close neighborhood as Micheline Calmy-Rey, the Prosecutor Pierre Aubert and members of the federal Court"
d2412
22.09.2014 The warning bell given to the member of federal council of States, Luc Recordon, for the criminality committed with screen lawyers with the violation of article 30 of the Constitution. Violation of article 30 cste: the office of the pursuits of the Broye assists the federal Judges to use banks for covering economic criminality committed with screen lawyers and the legal rules which bind lawyers to the federal Court. It's time that banks refuse claims bound to crimes committed with screen lawyers under the protection of the federal Court! It is a matter of their credibility with the American senate! It would be necessary to send to the American senate the list of the federal judges who cover the crimes committed with screen lawyers. d2411
19.09.2014 The Fribourg State Council acknowledges receipt of the dysfunctionning of the protective measures We remind that on 1st September measures to protect the fundamental rights have been required. They still don't work on September 13th, see d2399 d2408
19.09.2014 The office of the pursuits is invited to take position on the respect of article 35 of the Federal Constitution for this case which has not been planned by the legislator If the legislator did not plan a case, by default it is the article 35 cste which should be applicable. It is also possible that the federal lock prevents the state employees to respect the article fo the Constitution. Situation to be clarified ! D2407
18.09.2014 The office of pursuits sends an notice of seizure for rhe claimed debt of lawyer Patrick Gruber We remind that the lawyer Patrick Gruber has refused to take the mandate to enforce the article 30 cste. In turn, he deceived relations which bind his lawyer brotherhood to the Courts by wanting to charge a service which he refused to honour. d2406
17.09.2014 The state Councillor Erwin Jutzet thanked for his involvement and precisions Three actions will be taken on the basis of the precisions given by State Councillor Erwin Jutzet. The first one with the Aaudois Council of State, the second one with the Fribourg "Chamber of bankrupties", the third one with the FSA (Swiss Federation of Lawyers. d2404
15.09.2014 Fribourg government acknowledges receipt of the new facts An example to be followed ! The post d2391 is just arrived that it is already processed.! d2403
15.09.2014 The State Council take partial position on the violation of the article 30 cste It would be the State of Vaud, who is responsible for the crimes committed with violation article 30 cste with the use of screen lawyer, see d2385. We will come back on this point which raises quite a lot of questions on this criminal case. d2402
13.09.2014 A common mail, regarding the violation of article 30cste, is sent to all the concerned parties. Protective measures required further to the violation of the article 30 cste are not known of all the parties. A clarification is made to avoid any misunderstanding. d2400
13.09.2014 Risk is confirmed. The State Council is informed. The State Police informed Mr Erni that he was the object of an arrest warrant direct consequence of the violation of the article 30 cste. Mr Erni informs the State Council about the article 30 cste violation and requests protections according to guaranteed rights by the swiss Constitution (article 9 cste) d2399
10.09.2014 Preventive Action by the State Police following the violation of article 30 cste. State Police is informed about the harassing risks and constraint acts which could com from the violation of article 30 cste. It is requested from the State Police to inform the State Council and the Prosecution if the risks become a reality. d2398
10.09.2014 Request to the Prosecution to watch for the respect of the article 9 cste The Prosecutor knows the content of the parliamentary inquiry demand. He knows that no magistrate would agree to be so treated . He can watch for the respect of the article 9 cste, as Mr Erni requires it d2397
10.09.2014 Precision given to the Court for proceeding to an appeal in respect of article 30 of the Constitution A jurist advises to appeal but by requiring the respect of the article 30 cste. He also suggests that the FSA takes position because this case would not exist without the relations which bind the lawyers to the Courts, relations which are at the origin of the crimes for the complete case as proves it the parliamentary inquiry demand. d2396
10.09.2014 Complaint transmitted to the government of Fribourg with the objective to set up a Court which fulfills the requirement or article 30 of the Swiss Constitution. The parliamentary inquiry demand showed that the relations which bound the lawyers to the Courts allowed them to commit crimes with complete impunity ! It is one case which the legislator did not plan. The State Council has the power and the duty of function to complete the law to protect the victims of these crimes by setting up a Court which can respect the requirements of article 30 cste for this particular case of crime. It has to be made in association with the Swiss government. d2391
09.09.2014 A Court which gives of appeal delay already overpassed for a recourse avenue which doesn't exist. This registred letter was received on September 9th against signature. It indicates an appeal delay up to September 5th and there is no appeal avenue in front of an independent Court. Violation article 30 cste. It is harassing! Furthermore, it is the lawyer who did not want to take the mandate for enforcing the respect of the article 30 cste which is at the origin of the procedure. It is David against Goliath! d2394
09.09.2014 Crimes committed with the relations which bind lawyers to the Courts / A complaint has been laid by the Prosecution. It will be transmitted to the government of Fribourg and to the Swiss government. In Switzerland: a Court President is not allowed to make testify a screen lawyer forbidden to testify by a lawyer brotherhood, while he is the unique witness of a crime committed by lawyers. There is evidence violation of the article 30 of Swiss Constitution.
A complaint is laid further to the refusal of Me Patrick Gruber to take the mandate to enforce the article 30 cste in this given context. The objective is to identify and to make condemn the members of the Swiss underworld who set up this brotherhood rule which allows the lawyers to use the power of the Courts to commit crimes with screen lawyers.
d2390
03.09.2014 Fribourg government acknowledges receipt of the case Thanks to the fribourgeoises Authorities to have acknowledged receipt of the file d2389
02.09.2014 The President of the federal Assembly is contacted for enforcing articles 30 cste and 169 Cste in front of criminality committed with screen lawyers The situation is explained to the President of the federal Assembly so that he enforces the will of the Swiss expressed in the federal Constitution and so that he ends the criminality committed with screen lawyers who use the power of the federal Court to commit their crimes. d2387
30.08.2014 A lawyer refuses to take the mandate to enforce the article 30 cste Me Patrick Gruber refused to take the mandate to enforce the article 30 cste. He goes to court for obtaining the payment of a note of honorary for this service which he refused to honor.
This case which protect swiss underworld interest will be soon developed on this site!
d2388
28.08.2014 The fribourg Council of State is contacted for enforcing the article 30 cste in front of criminality committed by lawyers The case which did not plan the legislator is explained to the Council of State d2385
22.08.2014 A complaint is lodged against Me Kolly and those who help screen lawyers to commit crimes with complete impunity. The complaint aims at ending the criminality committed with screen lawyers. As the legislator did not plan the case, the case is carried in front of the fribourgeois government and in front of the federal Assembly. d2381
21.08.2014 Me Kolly violates again its Oath of function. Me Kolly confirms cunningly that the federal Court grants the immunity to those who use screen lawyers to commit crimes. See demand follow up
28.07.2014 the President of the Neuchâtel government challenged to end the Swiss constitution violation by Prosecutor Pierre AUBERT Me Alain RIBAUX, president of Neuchâtel government knows that the legislator did not plan neutral and independent Courts to judge the crimes committed with screen lawyers. He is challenged to respect its Oath of function in front of Constitution violation by Prosecutor Pierre AUBERT d2373
23.07.2014 The President of the federal Court challenged to confirm his Oath of function within the framework of a mobbing action led by his Court to cover the crimes committed with screen lawyers and with obvious violation of the respect of the article 30 cste Me Kolly is made aware that its Court makes harass a citizen with a forgery in the Titles bound to crimes committed with a screen lawyer. He knows that the forgery in the Titles concerns the criminals described in the parliamentary inquiry demand. He knows that these criminals escaped penal condemnations thanks to the abuse of authority of the federal Court. He is challenged to confirm that he respects his Oath of function by letting make this act of harassment based on the corruption. He knows that this act of harassment aims at covering Micheline Calmy-Rey's perfidy and acts of abuses of authority of Prosecutor Pierre AUBERT to allow the bankers and the lawyers to use the power of the federal Court to commit crimes with complete impunity with screen lawyers. d2370
nov. 2012 The Neuchâtel Prosecutor Pierre AUBERT covers the organized crime committed with screen lawyers The Neuchâtel Prosecutor who has the duty of function by its Oath to judge the criminal organization violates his prosecutor's Oath. He takes measures to reinforce the power of the criminal organization which uses the power of the federal Court with screen lawyers to commit crimes. Faits à l'abri des lumières
06.07.2011 The perfidy of the President of the Confederacy Micheline Calmy-Rey who has the duty of function to end the criminality committed with screen lawyers violates her Oath of function. She gives an alleged statement of the federal council for reinforcing the power of the criminal organization. She sets up the new federal lock which allows the bankers and the lawyers to use screen lawyers to commit crimes with complete impunity. Felonie
17.12.2005 Parliamentary inquiry demand on the crimes committed by lawyers with the power of the Swiss Courts. The Public who attends a trial discovers that the relations which bind the lawyers brotherhoods to the Courts allows the lawyers to use the Courts to commit crimes with complete impunity. The described facts show that Courts are under the control of a real criminal organization which uses screen lawyers to commit its crimes.

d311

see also
Homepage tab