This site aims to break the silence on the economic crimes committed with magistrates' power which violate their Oath to observe the Constitution and with the power of lawyers which deceive privileges which bind them to the Courts.

Last update : Wednesday, 12 th May 2021 RETURN


Principal Theme:


The new federal lock which allows banks and lawyers to use screen-lawyers to commit crimes with complete impunity in Switzerland and abroad with the protection of the federal Court.
 
     
Today Theme: Respect of article 30 of the Constitution by Swiss Authorities.
In Switzerland, the relations which bind the brotherhoods of lawyers to the Courts prevent the investigation of crimes committed with screen-lawyers. The victims of these crimes have no access to neutral and independent Courts. There is violation of the article 30 of the Swiss supreme law.
The Swiss politicians are here invited to end this violation of the Swiss Constitution.
 
     
1st Result The Swiss Justice is infiltrated by a criminal organization named: "le Réseau OAV". The Kamikazes of Daech use the same modus operandi which is used by this occult organisation to impose their law and impose a climate of terror with the power of their State "Damage caused with secret procedures from which we cannot protect ourselves  

HISTORY FILE:

DATE ACTION COMMENT LINK
       
12.05.21 FIFA CASE: RECUSAL OF EXTRAORDINARY FEDERAL PROSECUTOR STEFAN KELLER FOR ALLEGED LIE:

Senator Philippe Bauer admits the mistakes of the legislator by hiding the solution proposed by the expert of the Parliament F. de Rougemont.

The Federal Prosecutor, Stefan KELLER, recused by the Federal Court in the Infantino case, dismissed the charges of lying, quote:

"Dans un communiqué, Stefan Keller dit prendre note de la décision. Il rejette toutefois les accusations formulées dans l'arrêt selon lesquelles il aurait "communiqué des informations trompeuses et incorrectes sur le plan factuel".

Source : RTS_INFO 5.05.21

 

COMMENTS BY SENATOR P. BAUER

The Senator P. Bauer, member of the Committee on Legal Affairs of the Parliament, well known for having forced the Federal Court to pronounce a judgment which states in substance that:

"a lawyer must disobey the President of the Bar so that the Federal Council can respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution"

criticized, as an initiate, the laws put in place by the legislator.

Me Philippe BAUER knew in detail the practices described in the request for parliamentary investigation

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

and the facts established by Me de Rougemont, which had convinced the Neuchâtel justice of the violation of fundamental rights with the injunctions of the Presidents of the Bar

See jugement NE

he had already shown that the legislator gave the members of the Chambers of Lawyers an advantage by having obtained that the Federal Court overturn this judgment with the argument that the lawyers had to disobey the Presidents of the Bar so that the fundamental rights of the litigants would not be violated.

He confirms again that the Federal Council cannot enforce fundamental rights, with its comments on the recusal of the Federal Prosecutor Stefan KELLER, which show that the legislator puts in place laws that cannot work !

To listen to his interview
TJ 19h30 du 5.5.2021

Sénateur Philippe BAUER
Me Philippe BAUER
Former President of the Bar
Highly Neuchâtel paid lawyer
Senator in Parliament
Representative of PLR Values in Parliamentt

Note that in his interview, Philippe Bauer omits to say that Stefan KELLER rejected the accusations made in the judgment of the Federal Judges

To listen the interview with Stefan Keller

TJ 19h30/ SK05.05.21

DID THE FEDERAL JUDGES, WHO CHALLENGED STEFAN KELLER, LIE BY OMISSION?, OR DID A PRESIDENT OF THE BAR, COLLEAGUE OF SENATOR PHILIPPE BAUER, INTERVENE TO HAVE STEFAN KELLER RECUSED FOR ALLEGED LIES?

Senator Philippe BAUER knows that the lie by omission and the right of the accused: "to lie to defend himself" are two means made available to prosecutors and magistrates by the legislator (the Parliament) to prevent the Federal Council from enforcing fundamental rights.

 

Solution proposed by the expert of the Parliament of Vaud to enable the Federal Council to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitutionn

Reminder

Parliament’s expert, François de Rougemont, was appointed following the Zug massacre. He had the mandate to avoid another Zug massacre.

He explained that the laws put in place by Parliament allow lawmakers to commit crimes with impunity, preventing substantive issues from being addressed.

To avoid another Zug massacre, he undertook to answer all the substantive issues.

 

The lie by omission of judicial magistrates

Me de Rougemont had explained that it was a common practice of magistrates and prosecutors to set aside facts to benefit a party.

The legislator had not provided any means to control that the Prosecutors did not rule out facts.

On the contrary, the lack of independence of the Chamber of Lawyers from the Tribunals prevented any transparency on these practices, which make us shudder.

Moreover, the principle put in place by Parliament, that the accused has the right to lie in order to defend himself, benefited the members of criminal organizations to obtain the dismissal with benefit of the doubt.

 

The solution proposed by Parliament’s expert to put an end to these practices which make us shudder

Me de Rougemont had said that it would be sufficient for the legislator to require that all interviews and hearings made with judicial magistrates be recorded and even filmed so that prosecutors and judges can no longer use the lie by omission for giving benefits to a party.

This solution is mentioned by the public in an interview he had on January 12, 2007 with this expert from Parliament.

See exhibit 070116DP_FR

 

Advantage of this solution proposed by Parliament’s expert

In 2002, the General Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter in the presence of Jacques Antenen, member of the judges' supervisory authority, organized an interview of which there should be no trace to cover lies by omission of Judge Treccani. They would not have been able to do so if the legislator had implemented the solution proposed by Parliament’s expert.

See exhibit 020616DE_JS

Michael Lauber and Gianni Infantino would not have been able to hold secret talks without minute if this solution were implemented by the legislator.

Federal prosecutor Stefan KELLER, recused for alleged lies by federal judges, would have the recordings that allow him to show the people that he did not lie as he claims.

He could also show the people that Senator Philippe BAUER failed to speak of these alleged lies and that he knows the solution proposed by the Parliament’s expert to put an end to the discredit of the Prosecutors.

The lawyer who promised to shoot down a Federal Councillor, to force Parliament to put in place laws that allow the Federal Council to respect the Constitution, would no longer have any reason to do so.

See exhibit 210511DE_UM

The Valais Parliament would no longer have any reason to elect its General Prosecutor with a hearing forbidden to the public.

See Info_RTS_du 7.05.2021

 

Disadvantage of this solution
Members of criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament would be partially unmasked.

They could no longer receive the millions of salaries that the State pays to their members to set up and enforce despicable laws that prevent the members of the Federal Council from enforcing the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.

Advantages of the disadvantage

It should be noted that this disadvantage would make it possible to finance extensively the recordings required by this solution proposed by the Parliament’s expert.

Parliaments would no longer have to look for judges who are willing to lie by omission to violate the fundamental rights of litigants and give benefits to members of lawyers' brotherhoods.

Senator Bauer would have no more reason to criticize the despicable laws put in place by the legislator.

The Cantonal and Federal Police would no longer need to be deprived of independent Public Ministries whose Prosecutors do not have the competence to judge crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the Bar

See exhibit 210512DE_PA

 
05.05.21 THE REQUEST FOR TRANSPARENCY MADE BY ALAIN BERSET ON THE MANDATE OF PHILIPPE SCHWAB IS PROCESSED WITHOUT DELAY BY AN EXTRAORDINARY FEDERAL PROSECUTOR

In 2009, the current Senator, Me Philippe BAUER, obtained a judgment of the Federal Court which states in substance that a lawyer must disobey the President of the Bar so that the fundamental rights of his client are not violated.

The Federal Councillor, Alain BERSET, knows that the General Secretary of Parliament has been given the mandate to deal with a claim for compensation for the damage caused by the Confederation without rights.

He knows that it relates to these above words of Senator Philippe BAUER who revealed the existence of a hidden right to the people.

He knows that federal judges have given advantages to Philippe BAUER’s colleagues by confirming that a lawyer must disobey the President of the BAR so that prosecutors are not forced by the Bar Association to violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.

He noted that Philippe SCHWAB, General Secretary of Parliament, cannot respect human dignity with his mandate.

He asked the Federal Police for details on this blatantly crass violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution that allows to destroy the lives of citizens.

Alain BERSET

Alain BERSET
FEDERAL COUNCILLOR
Minister of Health

From experience, he knows that the law of silence does not allow to fight a covid-19 pandemic, nor does it allow to stop a criminal organization infiltrated Parliament

IN RESPONSE TO THIS REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION FROM THE FEDERAL COUNCILLOR TO THE FEDERAL POLICE, AN EXTRAORDINARY FEDERAL PROSECUTOR DECIDED TO MAKE VISIBLE THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOME MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT AND GENERAL PROSECUTORS

This extraordinary Federal Prosecutor replied by return of the mail, on February 16, 2021, to this request for transparency of Alain BERSET and the Federal Police.

This extraordinary Federal Prosecutor has given evidence that a criminal organization is infiltrated into Parliament

According to the powerful observation methodology of physicists, he revealed that the members of this criminal organization impose on the General Prosecutors the application of hidden rules to the people that allow their members to commit crimes with full impunity.

In this case, he made it apparent that the General Prosecutors did not have the jurisdiction to deal with crimes committed with the injunctions of the Bar President!

All Prosecutors and Members of the Bar Association knew this!

 

The existence of the criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament that had not revealed the expert of the Vaudois Parliament

In 2007, the expert of the Parliament of Vaud, Me François de ROUGEMONT, had explained to the members of the delegation of the public who filed the request for parliamentary investigation, quote :

« les particularités de la loi vaudoise qui permettent la criminalité économique par des hommes de loi en toute impunité. »

See exhibit: 070827DP_GC

On the other hand, Me de Rougemont never spoke of the hidden relations to the people that bind members of Parliament to the General Prosecutor. He did not say that these relationships allow them to force the general Prosecutor, with rules hidden from the people, to violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution.

He has never spoken, and let alone given the evidence, about the existence of members of a criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament that has put in place these hidden rules to the people, which force judges to give benefits to members of their organization.

 

The Federal Police was tasked to communicate to Alain BERSET, the response by return of the mail, of the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor.

See exhibit: 210505DE_IB

We can welcome Alain BERSET’s request for transparency. He, with his experience in managing Covid-19, knows that it is not possible to legislate an end to a pandemic.

He knows even more that the Federal Council has no right to destroy Lives with a criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament.

Now he knows that Members of Parliament, who hire General Prosecutors, are imposing hidden rules on them to cover up organized crime. These rules allow the Prosecutors to use backmail on CEO, death threats and even murder as shown by the alleged murder of the right-hand man of the Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA.

He knows that the Federal Council has an obligation to respect the lives of citizens and that it must put an end to the actions of the members of this organization infiltrated in Parliament.

Meanwhile, as with Covid-19, he knows that the Federal Council must take urgent measures to end the persecution of citizens with rules hidden from the people, put in place by members of this criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament.

210505DE_IB
28.04.21 AN EXTRAORDINARY FEDERAL PROSECUTOR GIVES EVIDENCE THAT PARLIAMENT IS INFILTRATED BY MEMBERS OF A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION

He reveals the secret weapon that the superheroes of the criminal organization are equipped with. He showed how this weapon allows members of the criminal organization to violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

He gave a rational explanation to understand the reasons that led a dissenting lawyer to commit to shoot down a Federal Councillor to enforce Parliament to restore respect for fundamental rights.

Each must objectively observe these facts, including the handling of the secret weapon by the superheroes of the state, reported with the methodology of physicists.

Jacques Antenen
Monsignor
Jacques ANTENEN
Commander of the Vaud Cantonal Police

One of the superheroes, engaged in a key position of the State, one of whose Dogmas is reported on March 17, 2021, below!

 

Unlike the head of the Vatican, Jacques Antenen never questioned the credibility of his Dogma.

It is recalled that after denying the observations made by Galileo in 1633, the Head of State of the Vatican rehabilitated him on October 31, 1992, 360 years later.

In 2021, everyone should be able to understand that the secret weapon that superheroes are equipped with, like Jacques ANTENEN, Jean Marc SCHWENTER, Eric COTTIER, Michael LAUBER, the federal judges,..., is used to violate the fundamental rights of the people

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT WAS FILED AGAINST THIS CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION SO THAT MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT AND OF THE FEDERAL COUNCIL COULD DISCOVER ITS EXISTENCE, IDENTIFY ITS SUPERHEROES, AND STOP ITS ACTIVITIES

See exhibit: 210426DE_AA

By having publicly revealed the existence of this criminal organization, the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor agreed with the lawyer who committed to shoot down a Federal Councillor to put an end to the activities of the criminal organization.

Most importantly, he gave the Federal Council the means to identify the members of the criminal organization and to take public action to show that, contrary to the dissenting lawyer’s assertions, it is out of the question for the Federal Council to allow members of this criminal organization, infiltrated into the state, to violate the fundamental rights of citizens.

He gave the Federal Council, which has the same power as the head of the Vatican, the means to act to put an end to the deceptions of the people by the State, as did the head of the Vatican in confirming the accuracy of Galileo’s observations..

 

The secret weapon that equips magistrates in key positions

This weapon is a hidden rule for the people put in place by members of Parliament Criminal Organisation, which states :

“The MAGISTRATES have no jurisdiction to judge the obligation of a lawyer to have the defence of a client override any directives or injunctions of a President of the BAR.”

 

For example (theoretical case):

Prosecutors have no jurisdiction to enforce the fundamental rights of citizens, guaranteed by the Constitution, who are victims of a crime committed by the Chairman of the Board of Directors of a company in the following case :

The President of the Board of Directors is a member of the Bar Association and the President of the Bar Association has forbidden him to be the subject of a criminal complaint.

 

For example (practical case)

In 1995, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA committed the offences of unfair management, fraud and copyright infringement. He justifies his offences by stating that they will never be investigated because he is a member of the Chamber of Lawyers!

Read the request for a parliamentary inquiry to find out how the President of the Bar prevent prosecutors from investigating offences using rules hidden from the people set up by Parliament

See exhibit: 051217DP_GC

 

The interventions of the superheroes of the criminal organization

The criminal organization has placed superheroes at the key posts in the state, whose claims are not dared to be questioned.

For example :
Jaques Antenen said that, quote:

" If the judge Jean Treccani made disappear the unfair management offence from his Court order, it was because there were none"

See exhibit: 020616DE_JS

It is like the time of Galileo when the Monsignors of the State claimed that the Earth was still at the center of the Universe, despite the evidence that it was false.

Discover on this site the interventions of other superheroes, like Eric COTTIER, Bertrand Sauterel, with the rules hidden from the people put in place by the Parliament.

Read also, the criminal complaint: 210426DE_AA

This criminal complaint gives the Federal Council the means to show publicly that the dissenting lawyer wrongly believes that the Federal Authorities do not want to enforce fundamental rights.

Case to be followed !

210426DE_AA
21.04.21 THE SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE SWISS PARLIAMENT IS MADE AWARE OF THE MANDATE OF THE EXPERT OF THE VAUDOIS PARLIAMENT, Me DE ROUGEMONT

On February 16, 2021, the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, mandated to deal with crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar, revealed that Prosecutors do not have the jurisdiction to judge crimes committed by members of the Bar, when a lawyer refuses to disobey to the President of the BAR.

The expert from the Vaudois Parliament, who had dealt with the same issue in 2006, revealed that he regretted that the orphans of the Zug massacre did not know why their parents were killeds.

He gave the magic formula that the elected representatives should have applied to prevent the killing and respect the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

This formula is obviously circumvented with the collective amnesia disease suffered by some of our Prosecutors and with the new procedures applied by Prosecutor Eric Cottier

Philippe Schwab

Philippe SCHWAB
General Secretary of the Swiss Parliament

 

He obviously does not know the magic formula given by the expert of the Parliament of Vaud

IT’S NO ORDINARY THING TO HEAR AN EXPERIENCED LAWYER TELL YOU THAT HE HAS BEEN MANDATED BY THE VAUDOIS PARLIAMENT TO AVOID ANOTHER ZUG MASSACRE AND THAT PARLIAMENTARIANS KNOW THE MAGIC FORMULA TO AVOID A MASSACRE

When we consult the Internet or wikipedia, we do not find traces of the mandate given by the Parliament of Vaud to Me François de ROUGEMONT.

Yet this expert, an experienced lawyer, did indeed exist, as shown by one of the minutes of the meeting of the public delegation with him.

See exhibit: 070116DP_FR

After the Zug massacre, this expert received the litigants by saying: that he had been mandated by the Vaudois Parliament to avoid another massacre.

¨

He is the expert who was tasked with processing the request for a parliamentary inquiry

See exhibit: 051217DP_GC

To avoid further killing:

« He said that he was committed to answering all the substantive questions, without using the doublespeak »

It was the magic formula that would have prevented the killing of Zug and that would have prevented another killing.

Me De ROUGEMONT said that he had one regret, it was that the orphans of the killing of Zug did not know why their parents had been killed.

 

To the public’s question:

“How is it possible that the President of the Bar BETTEX was able to prohibit the witness of the false denunciation from testifying,” he replied:

"The Courts were not independent of the Chamber of Lawyers" »

He had confirmed that the President of ICSA, Me Foetisch, who was a member of the Bar Association, used this lack of independence hidden from the people to commit his crimes.

In 2016, a dissident lawyer will confirm these facts by talking about Initiates who all know it.

He will claim that Friedrich LEIBACHER, better known as the Zug killer, was an Initiate. He sacrificed His Life so that elected officials would put an end to these procedures that prevent dealing with substantive issues and which the magistrates use to violate the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

From now on, no one can ignore the magic formula revealed by the Parliament’s expert to prevent another Zug massacre. In particular, it is important that Philippe Schwab knows this magic formula that was put in place by those who know what really happened on September 27, 2001 in Zug:

It is the secret of 27 September 2001 of the Initiates revealed by the lawyer of the Parliament

See exhibit: 210421DE_PS

210421DE_PS
14.04.21 IS SWITZERLAND A DEMOCRACY OR A "BARCRACY" ?

It is reminded that Albert Einstein said:

"Those who have the privilege of knowing has a duty to act!"

An extraordinary Federal Prosecutor reveals for the first time that the power of the members of the “BAR ASSOCIATION” is above the power of the Federal Judges and General Prosecutors.

It must be observed that all lawyers, members of the Bar Association, knew it!

 

Of the alert given by a senior lawyer

A dissident lawyer had already sounded the alarm in 2016, saying that the federal authorities are infiltrated by members of a criminal organization that controls power and deceives the people.......

 

From the dissenting lawyer’s message

He was saying that:

« Those who knew it dared not say it »

 

... this lawyer called them "The Initiates".  They were all bound by the initiates rule : 

«WE DON’T DARE TALK ABOUT IT»

According to him, among these INITIATES, there were members of a criminal organization, and elected representatives who dared not speak out by fear of economic and political reprisals.

 

The duty of the President of the Federal Assembly

The President of the Federal Assembly has the privilege to have been informed about the situation.

He knows that a federal prosecutor broke the law of silence.

He now has a duty to act.

 

 

Andreas AEBI

Andreas AEBI
Swiss Parliament President

 

Successor of Isabelle MORET who sent him the file on the crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the Bar Association

 

THE EXTRAORDINARY FEDERAL PROSECUTOR HAS PUT AN END TO THE “WE DON’T DARE TALK ABOUT IT” RULE, BY REVEALING THAT SWITZERLAND IS A "BARCRACY" !

By breaking a taboo on the existence of a criminal organization, he has just applied the message of young people who say :
« Silence on the violation of constitutional rights is no longer an option ».

Specialist in financial crime, this extraordinary Federal Prosecutor has dared to break the silence on the hidden relation to the people that bind the Chamber of Lawyers to the magistrates of the judicial system.

 

The rule hidden from the people by the Bar Association

This Prosecutor dared to speak about the rule hidden from the people, which allowed Foetisch to commit crimes with impunity by having the insurance that his crimes would never be investigated.

This rule is as follows:

« No magistrate has any jurisdiction to judge the obligation of a lawyer to have the defence of a client override any directives or injunctions of a President of the Bar Association »

 

From the pyramid of Ponzi made with the hidden rule

The Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor pointed out that if a member of the Bar Association uses this rule that:

"the magistrates have no jurisdiction to judge the obligation of a lawyer to have the defence of a client override any directives or injunctions of the President of the Bar Association",

then he can commit crimes with full impunity.

=> It is a chain of PONZI, worthy of the one used by Bernard MADOFF, to defraud the citizens. Here it allows members of the Bar Assocition to swindle citizens with state power

Everyone can observe that:

« It is enough for the member of the Bar Association, like Foetisch, to obtain an injunction from the President of the Bar that prevents the investigation of his crimes so that: the Federal Judges and all lower courts, who have not juridiction to judge his crimes and who do not recuse themselves spontaneously, are forced to make permanent denials of justice to cover his crimes»

 

FROM THE FOETISCH GANG THAT PRACTICES THE RULE OF THE INITIATES: "WE DO NOT DARE SPEAK OF IT"

Patrick Foetisch uses this pyramid of Ponzi to commit his crimes. He is as great as Bernard Madoff who died this Wednesday.

The Journalist Romain GUBERT, who wrote the book entitled:

"And above all, do not tell anyone, ….. in the heart of the Madoff gang" (ref.: Romain Gubert)

shows how Madoff could use the institutions to commit the biggest scam in history with a Ponzi chain. He could have written the same book on the crimes committed by Patrick Foetisch, with the title:

"And above all, don’t tell anyone, ….. at the heart of the Foetisch gang"

 

The end of the rule: "you don’t dare talk about it"

By revealing this hidden rule to the people that Foetisch uses to commit his crimes, this Federal Prosecutor has especially shown the existence of this gang or criminal organization infiltrated in the highest authorities of the Country. It made it possible to understand the behaviour of these initiated magistrates, who invent diseases and procedures, which do not exist, so as not to disobey the injunctions of the Presidents of the Bar Association.

The most screwed up, among them, make secret sessions, without Minutes, which we dare not talk about, as Jean-Marc SCHWENTER, Jacques Antenen,...... , Michael LAUBER,... as shown in the following document:

exhibit: 020616DE_JS

with the terrible disease of collective amnesia, which Michael LAUBER suffers, which show the existence of this Foetisch Gang with its brilliant operating procedures hidden from the people.

 

Action to stop crimes committed with the PONZI chain

To end a chain of PONZI, we must cut the head of the Pyramid as it was done for Bernard Madoff.

The Federal Prosecutor has for the first time given an explanation why a dissenting lawyer proposed to shoot down a Federal Councillor to put an end to this form of criminality :

To observe that the Federal Council is at the top of the pyramid. If the federal Council spontaneously terminates the activities of the criminal organization, or if it is neutralized by the dissenting lawyer, the PONZI chain can no longer function and the lower links of the PONZI chain are automatically neutralized.

The alternative is to set up neutral and independent courts with the competence to judge crimes committed with this pyramid.

It is the role of the President of the Federal Assembly, who has the privilege of knowing and the duty to act !

See exhibit : 210414DE_AA

 

210414DE_AA
07.04.21 SINCE 16 FEBRUARY 2021, THE SECRETARY GENERAL OF THE SWISS PARLIAMENT HAS NO REASON TO REMAIN SILENT, ON THE CONTRARY HE HAS THE DUTY TO ACT!

The INITIATES rule that says:

"WE DON’T DARE TALK ABOUT IT"

…… is no longer applicable, since an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor took a written position on the crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR.

 

See exhibit: 210407DE_PS

Philippe SCHWAB
Philippe Schwab
General Secretary of the Swiss Parliament

He’s one of the Initiates.

He knows that an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor has for the first time confirmed in writing that Prosecutors do not have the jurisdiction to judge crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR

 

He knows that Einstein said:

« Those who have the privilege of knowing have the duty to act »

 

In this case, he no longer has to fear breaking the silence and enforcing the Values of the Constitution, since a Federal Prosecutor has already broken the law of Silence.

ON FEBRUARY 16TH, 2021, FOR THE FIRST TIME, AN EXTRAORDINARY FEDERAL PROSECUTOR TOOK THE INITIATIVE TO EXPOSE IN WRITING ONE OF THE METHODS OF JUDICIAL AND MEDIA CONTROL BY THE BAR ASSOCIATION, WHICH ACTS AS A FIREWALL BETWEEN PARLIAMENT AND THE PEOPLE

Before February 16th, 2021

Swiss media never reported on Foetisch’s crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR.

Me Foetisch was Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA, when he committed his crimes. He justified them by saying that he was protected by his membership in the Chamber of Advocates.

Exhibit: 051217DP_GC

 

The law of silence broken in writing on February 16th, by an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor

For the first time, on February 16th, 2021, an experienced lawyer, mandated as an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor to deal with crimes committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR, explained that the Prosecutors do not have the jurisdiction to judge these crimes, quote :

«His mandate does not confer on him any jurisdiction to judge the obligation of a lawyer to have the defence of a client override any directives or injunctions of a President of the BAR»

Observation #1

We find here the description of a method of the P2 lodge, of which his venerable Master, Licio GELLI, made several times the front page of the Swiss media.

He had even been housed in a prestigious Geneva building at Champ-Dollon. His sneaky departure by the big door to take his helicopter had made the headlines of the press, see tdg 16.12.2015

Observation #2

The Swiss Press never spoke about Foetisch’s methods to control the judges and the media, while it spoke at length about it for Licio GELLI who could have been his disciple.

Observation #3

With the written position of this extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, Philippe Schwab, and the INITIATES, know that it is officially made public that the Prosecutors do not have the competence to judge the crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR.

With the written revelations of this Federal Prosecutor, all parliamentarians know that there is a Firewall exercised by the Chamber of Advocates on the information transmitted to Parliament. This firewall allows members of the Chamber of Advocates to prevent elected members of parliament from enforcing the fundamental rights of the people.

Observation #4

This extraordinary Federal Prosecutor revealed that Switzerland has a State in the State, the CHAMBER OF ADVOCATES, which controls the power of judges with secret rules, as Lodge P2 was considered a state in the state that controlled power with rules hidden from the people.

210407DE_PS
31.03.21 TWO NOBEL PRIZE WINNER EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE AND THE CIVIL DUTY OF TRANSPARENCY

Two scientists, physicist and biophysicist, Nobel Prize winner, give a lesson in ethics and respect for the Values of the Constitution to the Swiss authorities…

They explain to the people the difference for a scientist that there is between:

 

« civil duty of transparency »

and

« civil disobedience »

 

One of them, Albert Einstein, says that, quote:

« Those who have the privilege of knowing have a duty to act »

 

Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein
Physicist
Nobel Prize in Physics

 

…. Albert Einstein and biophysicist Jacques Dubochet come to the aid of researchers from the largest Swiss universities and scientists from a dozen countries, They are warning about the destruction of the planet by the censorship of scientific data by members of the political authorities.

 

To listen :

TJ 19h30 of March 25th 2021

 

Observation

Scientists observe that the data they generate are ignored by the political world, they seek the cause......

None of them thought that the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR allow to distort and ignore the data established by the observations of the scientists and those of the people

ON FEBRUARY 16 TH, 2021, AN EXTRAORDINARY FEDERAL PROSECUTOR DEMONSTRATED THAT MEMBERS OF FEDERAL AUTHORITIES VIOLATE THEIR CIVIL DUTY OF TRANSPARENCY AND THEY ARE CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE BY ENACTING LAWS THAT ALLOW MEMBERS OF THE CHAMBER OF ADVOCATES TO MISREPRESENT THE DATA OBSERVED BY SCIENTISTS AND DECEIVE THE PEOPLE WITH THE LAW OF SILENCE

It took two NOBELS PRIZE, Albert EINSTEIN and Jacques DUBOCHET - who have the privilege of knowing - to show that they have a duty to act and that they act, for an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, an initiate, decides to act in turn by showing that elected members of Parliament are putting in place laws to decree that facts do not exist.

 

An extraordinary Federal Prosecutor - who has the privilege of knowing - acted on February 16th, 2021, revealing a practice of the political world that makes us shudder

This extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, appointed to deal with crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR, had at his disposal the data published on this site. In particular:

1) He knew that Senator Philippe BAUER said that a lawyer must disobey the President of the BAR so that the fundamental rights of his client are not violated by the injunction of the President of the BAR, who forced this lawyer, witness of crime committed by other lawyers, to remain silent

2) He was aware of the terrible illness that struck Michael LAUBER: "the collective amnesia". He knew that the Prosecutors, suffering from this terrible disease, make sessions without minutes that they do not remember and that allow to deny the existence of facts showing corruption and organized crime, ....

 

This extraordinary Federal Prosecutor then revealed on February 16th, 2021, that the Parliament has put in place a law to investigate the crime committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR, which has as consequence that, quote:

« His mandate does not confer on him any jurisdiction to judge the obligation of a lawyer to have the defence of a client override any directives or injunctions of a President of the BAR »

 

Censorship of scientists by parliamentarians is no longer taboo since March 9th

On March 9th, the Swiss Press reported that parliamentarians wanted to censor information given by Covid-19 taskforce scientists to the people, on the grounds that: a law allowed to end the pandemic by having decreed that it was over.

A few elected members or Parliaments remembered that if the scientist, that was Galileo, observed that the Earth rotates, it was not enough for a parliamentarian to decree in a law that it does not rotate for this to be true. They said, quote :

« we cannot legislate an end to an epidemic, we must fight it »

See exhibit : 210309-MSN

 

Covid-19 pandemic is just the tip of the iceberg

Today parliamentarians know that they can no longer be credible by putting in place laws that declare that facts do not exist, while every citizen can verify by himself the existence of facts.

As Albert Einstein said and Jacques Dubochet demonstrated, parliamentarians know that:

« Those who have the privilege of knowing have a duty to act »

.... This is the first time that an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor has explained that the Presidents of the BAR has a role of Firewall that allows the Federal Authorities to violate their civil duty of transparency by denying the existence of facts or by distorting them.

 

After Michael LAUBER revealed the terrible disease he was suffering from, collective amnesia, the scientists have data that show that Vaudois personalities such as Jean-Marc SCHWENTER, Jacques ANTENEN, already suffered from this disease in 2002:

See exhibit: 020616DE_JS

The origin of this disease was observed in 2005 by reliable witnesses. It is due to the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR.

See exhibit: 051217DP_GC

210309-MSN

020616DE_JS

24.03.21 THE SYNOD MUST ANSWER THE QUESTIONS OF THE SHAMAN FOR THE 11th COMMANDMENT ISSUED BY THE MEMBERS OF A MASONIC LODGE INFILTRATED IN THE STATE

 

The  Ten  Commandments

Everyone knows the 10 commandments given by God to men, the third of which says:

« YOU SHALL NOT USE THE NAME OF THE ETERNAL YOUR GOD TO DECEIVE »

 

Of the Almighty God of the Constitution

The Federal Constitution begins its preamble by referring to Almighty God and His Values for Creation. Quote :

In the name of Almighty God!
The Swiss People and the Cantons,
mindful of their responsibility towards creation,
resolved to renew their alliance so as to strengthen liberty, democracy, independence and peace in a spirit of solidarity and openness towards the world,
determined to live together with mutual consideration and respect for their diversity
...

 

Of the 11th Commandment

The Constitution does not speak of the 11th COMMANDMENT, which is the command to pay.

The latter was not given by God to men, but it was given by members of a Masonic lodge infiltrated into the state.

This 11th commandment is currently used by the State, in the name of the Church, or in the name of Almighty God, to force citizens to fund members of a criminal organization. In particular, the state used it against a physicist.

The Synod was alerted by this physicist, a scientist like Galileo, of the risks associated with this 11th Commandment.

This physicist chose to resign from the church to observe in complete independence the effects of this  11th commandment which makes the happiness of the members of a Masonic lodge.

 

Observation :

This 11th command is used to violate the first 10 commandments by members of a criminal organization!

 

The SYNOD is alerted

The SYNOD must control how the State respects the 10 commandments, or the human rights guaranteed by the ECHR which are based on the same Values.

Evelyne BORER
Evelyne BORER
President of Synod

A heavy responsibility for the name of God not to be used to deceive the people by members of a Masonic lodge infiltrated into the state.

 

See exhibit 210317DE_EB

 

IN AN ORGANIZED CRIME CASE INVOLVING THE INTERVENTIONS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE BAR, AN EXTRAORDINARY FEDERAL PROSECUTOR, MANDATED TO DEAL WITH THE CASE, SAID THAT QUOTE: “His mandate does not confer on him any jurisdiction to judge the obligation of a lawyer to have the defence of a client override any directives or injunctions of the President of the BAR”

 

Gross violation of the Value of the Constitution

These crimes are committed by members of brotherhoods of lawyers and persons, in charge of a task of the State, who lie, who steal, who make false testimonies against their neighbour, who kill (see the conditions of the death of Foetisch’s right-hand man on this site) and who use the name of the GOD of the Constitution to deceive the people,

In short: they violate the 10 commandments of Almighty God which are recalled here :

Reminder of the Ten Commandments

1 -You shall have no other gods before Me
2 - You shall not make idols
3 - You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain
4 - Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy
5- Honor your father and your mother
6 -You shall not murder.
7- You shall not commit adultery.
8- You shall not steal.
9- You shall not bear false witness against your neighbour.
10 -You shall not covet.

 

Questions from the Shaman
Concerning these crimes committed, for example by Me Foetisch, with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR, a Shaman had said in 2001 that it was necessary to ask the highest leaders of the country five questions, one of which was the following :

« Do you believe that the forces of evil exist »

 

Comment #1 :
For the members of the Masonic lodges, who do not believe in God, we observe that the question of the Shaman has no meaning.
Their Oath to respect the Constitution has no value for them. What matters to them is not to disobey their Master, for example the President of the Bar for lawyers..

It is noted that this is the full scope of the above fact established by the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor.

 

Comment #2 :
The power of the Shamans is not explainable by scientists. They can only apply the recommendations of the Shamans and observe the effects announced by the Shamans:

(1) This question of the Shaman on the existence of the forces of evil, relating to the crimes committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR, was asked according to her recommendation to the President of the Confederation, Simonetta Sommaruga.

(2) First unpredictable effect: Mr. Vincent Goumaz - who was aware of the situation - then made a Securities fraud to hide this case of crimes committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR

(3) Criminal complaint was filed against Mr. Vincent Goumaz, but second unpredictable effect before the Federal Prosecutor explained that the Prosecutors were not competent to investigate the crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR, the Prosecutors refused to investigate the criminal complaint for forgery in Securities, hiding their incompetence.

(4) Third unpredictable effect: Vincent GOUMAZ applied the 11th Commandment. He put a commandment to pay in the name of the Church against the physicist, specifying that the fraud in Securities served to finance the Church. He did not know that the Shaman is of Christian culture => she had specified that her questions were addressed to the senior leaders that the Physicist would be brought to meet. By Applying 11th Commandment, Vincent Goumaz showed that the Church was not independent of the Order of Lawyers and that the questions of the Shaman were addressed to the SYNOD which would have made agreements with the State that allow the State to use the name of GOD to deceive the people and persecute the faithful..

5) Fourth unpredictable effect: the physicist refused to allow the Church to finance the members of a criminal organization with public funds. He asked Vincent GOUMAZ to inform the synod and he resigned from the church to escape this persecution

(6) Fifth unpredictable effect: Mr. Vincent Goumaz refused in the name of the Church that the Physicist resigned, he wanted the Church to make him a certificate attesting that he had resigned... =>the questions of the Shaman took meaning, when she said that her questions should be asked to expose leaders who violate the values of Life and serve to bring about change

Observation of the Physicist :
The Shaman had said to ask her questions to the senior leaders of the country.

This "Way of the Cross", with the position of Vincent Goumaz, shows that the questions of the Shaman are addressed particularly to the members of the SYNOD, who would not know these agreements made with the members of a Masonic lodge, to persecute the faithful.

As Vincent Goumaz wants a response from the Church, it is these members of the SYNOD - who must ensure that the Church is not infiltrated by members of a Masonic lodge to persecute the Swiss people -  who will have to specify :

What the Synod will do to end the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar, as long as the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor has confirmed that he does not have the competence to judge the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR and that despite this fact, the State replaces the God of Christians to persecute them with members of a criminal organization

210317DE_EB
17.03.21 “IF THE JUDGE (JT) MADE DISAPPEAR THE UNFAIR MANAGEMENT OFFENCE FROM HIS COURT ORDER, IT WAS BECAUSE THERE WERE NONE” 

See exhibit 020616DE_JS,
read top of page 3 of 4

This maxim was considered as a dogma by all the deputies of the Vaudois Parliament until 2020.

The Maxim was not said by the High Priest of the Temple of Solomon, but by a magistrate, equally starry. It was His Highness the magistrate Jacques ANTENEN, presumed High Priest of the temple of a Masonic lodge in Vaud State.

This dogma was questioned with the secret auditions without Minutes of Michael LAUBER.

Since the terrible disease of collective amnesia was discovered, Christian deputies of the Vaud Parliament are invited to take a position on this dogma

Jacques ANTENEN
Monsignor
Jacques ANTENEN
Commander of the Vaud State Police
Author of the DOGMA (JT)

 

He will have to undergo the test of the super propagators of the collective amnesia virus, following the enormous damage that this disease has already caused in his entourage.

10 MARCH 2021: STRUCK DOWN BY THE COLLECTIVE AMNESIA VIRUS THAT STRIKES MAGISTRATES, CONTAMINATED CANTONAL JUDGES TAKE THE PLACE OF DEPUTIES OF THE VAUDOIS PARLIAMENT TO SPREAD THE PANDEMIC... BUT DEPUTIES KNOW THAT IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO STOP A PANDEMIC WITH A DOGMA! !

They know that the Cantonal Court has neither the competence to set up an independent Court, nor the competence to rule on the crime committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR,…. since 16 February 2021.

In 2007, the expert of the Vaudois Parliament, Me De Rougemont, explained that Me Foetisch could not have committed his crimes if the Vaudois Parliament had set up an independent courts to judge the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR.

Senator Philippe BAUER agreed with this expert by saying that lawyers must disobey the President of the BAR so that the rights of their clients are not violated. In practice the lawyers do not dare to disobey their President, as the police officers do not dare disobey their Commander (even if he is very ill, as it is the case here).

The deputies of the Vaudois Parliament were asked to set up independent courts to judge the crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR.

On February 16, 2021, the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, appointed to deal with crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR, confirmed officially the remarks of Me De Rougemont, by saying that::

 "HIS MANDATE DOES NOT CONFER ON HIM ANY JURISDICTION TO JUDGE THE OBLIGATION OF A LAWYER TO HAVE THE DEFENCE OF A CLIENT TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ANY DIRECTIONS OR INJUNCTIONS OF A PRESIDENT OF THE BAR "

Jacques Antenen already knew this on June 12, 2002, during the interview with the Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter on the crimes committed by Me Foetisch, whose minutes were kept secret.

But no Christian in Parliament could have imagined that at that time Jean-Marc SCHWENTER and Jacques ANTENEN were already struck by the terrible disease of collective amnesia.

No one could have suspected that this virus has infiltrated the state, with the Order of Lawyers as site of infection, and then has formed a cluster with the members of a Vaud Masonic lodge who hold interviews without minutes or secret minutes..

As the Swiss Parliament’s plenum established, you can’t end a pandemic with a law or a dogma. You have to fight it.

Members of Parliament, who call themselves Christians, are invited to fight this pandemic, now that we know that Jacques ANTENEN was very ill when he said :

"If the judge Jean Treccani made disappear the unfair management offence from his Court order, it was because there were none."

For more details, see exhibit 210315DE_GC, with its appendices.

...This is all the more so since an expertise of Professor Franz Riklin has shown that dogma does not resist the examination of Professionals of the Law.

020616DE_JS

210315DE_GC

10.03.21 AFTER DISCOVERING THE EXISTENCE OF COLLECTIVE AMNESIA OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATES :

TO END THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE NATIONAL COUNCIL PLENUM REFUSES TO MUZZLE SCIENTISTS AND USE THE ORDER-IN-COUNCIL METHOD OF SENATOR PHILIPPE BAUER WHICH IS THE PRIMARY VECTOR FOR THE SPREAD OF THE COLLECTIVE AMNESIA VIRUS.

 

ORDER-IN-COUNCIL METHODIt is reminded that Senator Philippe BAUER obtained a judgment of the Federal Court which decrees in substance that lawyers must disobey the President of the BAR, so that their clients, victims of crimes committed with the interventions of the President of the BAR, do not suffer millions of damages and crass violation of their rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.

 

THE COLLECTIVE AMNESIA VIRUS

We recall that our highest prosecutors and judicial magistrates are overwhelmed by the pandemic of a terrible disease :

It is collective amnesia

This illness, as dangerous as Covid-19, causes the magistrates to forget having held secret sessions without minutes.

A prosecutor even started to become delirious by applying laws that do not exist!

"None of them remembers that they are paid by public funds to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution".

They have become, in spite of themselves, dangers for the Swiss people.

 

 

DAMAGE CREATED BY COVID-19 THAT WORKS LIKE THE DAMAGE CREATED BY THE INTERVENTION OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE BAR OR THE COLLECTIVE AMNESIA VIRUS

It took Covid-19 to show that it caused as much damage as the one created by the interventions of the President of the BAR, for Parliament’s plenum to find that:

« we cannot legislate an end to an epidemic, we must fight it »

See exhibit 210309-MSN

 

 

Philippe BAUER

Senator
Philippe BAUER
Neuchâtel State

Big-shot lawyer

This brilliant former President of the BAR had obtained a judgment from the Federal Court which decrees in substance that :

"lawyers must disobey the President of the BAR so that their clients do not suffer millions of damages due to the relations that bind the Bar Association to the Courts,...

...this decree does not allow to respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution, because the lawyers do not dare to disobey their President and their disobedience would not put an end to the collective amnesia of the judicial magistrates

 

In contrast, this decree has been very effective in making citizens insecure and provoking the curiosity of Federal Councillor Alain BERSET, who has the experience of his fight against covid-19.

See exhibit: 210211DE_IB

THE EXTRAORDINARY FEDERAL PROSECUTOR, APPOINTED TO DEAL WITH SENATOR BAUER’S ORDER-IN-COUNCIL METHOD, STATED ON FEBRUARY 16, 2021, THAT:

« HIS MANDATE DOES NOT CONFER ON HIM ANY JURISDICTION TO JUDGE THE OBLIGATION OF A LAWYER TO HAVE THE DEFENCE OF A CLIENT TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ANY DIRECTIONS OR INJUNCTIONS OF A BAR PRESIDENT "

IT IS NOTED THAT THIS FEDERAL PROSECUTOR WAS NOT INFECTED WITH THE COLLECTIVE AMNESIA VIRUS. HE AGREES WITH THE PLENUM OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL, WHICH HAS UNDERSTOOD THAT AN EPIDEMIC CANNOT BE ENDED WITH A LAW, BUT THAT IT MUST BE FOUGHT!.

 

SCIENTISTS COMMENT ON THE EFFECTS OF THE COLLECTIVE AMNESIA VIRUS

 

A) Facts known to magistrates not infected with the collective amnesia virus

A1) Courts' Lack of Jurisdiction to Judge Crime Committed by Injunctions of the Bar Presidents

All federal prosecutors and judges knew that they did not have the jurisdiction to override a client’s defence against the injunctions of a Bar President. This was noted in the public request for a parliamentary inquiry, which states, quote:

"The Bar Association reduces the power of the Judge"

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

Everyone knew that this observation was confirmed in 2007 by the Expert of Parliament, who explained that the Courts were not independent of the Bar Association and that the codes of procedure were not applicable, as described in these Minutes of a Public Interview with the Parliamentary Expert:

See exhibit 070116DP_FR

 

A2) The millions of damages caused by the interventions of the Bar Presidents and the alleged poisoning of Foetisch’s right arm

All the Federal Prosecutors and Judges knew that the magistrate Eric COTTIER, before he was struck down by the virus of collective amnesia, had established that the Value of the damage caused with the interventions of the Bar Presidents was several millions.
The sudden death of Mr. Penel, Foetisch’s right-hand man, was never correlated with the secret interview of 12 June 2002, with Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter and Jacques Antenen, whose minutes were kept secret.
It is noted that the Prosecutor Eric COTTIER, successor of this prestigious Prosecutor, who was Jean-Marc Schwenter, had access to the file which contained the minutes of the interview of June 12, 2002, kept secret. We underlines that a lawyer mentioned in the minutes, forced to wait outside, can attest the existence of this secret interview

See exhibit : 020616DE_JS

 

B) Delusions of magistrates infected with the collective amnesia virus

B1) Secret interview with General Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter, on 12 June 2002, the Minutes of which were kept secret

It was only in 2019 that Members of Parliament discovered that our prestigious Federal Prosecutor, Michael LAUBER, was conducting secret sessions without Minutes, which he did not remember. It was not until 2020 that it was determined that the Federal Prosecutor was seriously ill, contaminated and devastated by the collective amnesia virus..

It is only since 2021, that we dare to talk about this terrible disease, which had visibly reached already in 2002, the Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter, as shown by the Minutes of a secret interview, of which the Prosecutor COTTIER had access to the file.

See exhibit: 020616DE_JS

 

B2) Serious delusions caused by the collective amnesia virus in particular for the General Prosecutor COTTIER.

Overwhelmed by this disease, in good faith, the General Prosecutor Cottier believed that the Vaudois Parliament has put in place a law that decrees that : "when a defendant has not received a Court Order sent by mail A, it was sufficient for him to say that the post office had not returned the A mail document  to him, so that he brought formal proof that the defendant had received this Court Order".

Even though a CAP lawyer explained that this procedure does not work and that it does not exist, Prosecutor Cottier did not realize that he was delirious. He didn’t realize in his delusion that he may never have written that Court Order.
It was an unknown effect of the collective amnesia virus that made him forget that he was paid with taxpayers' money to uphold the fundamental rights of citizens, instead of having to give benefits to criminals.

This terrible collective amnesia virus was acting like Covid-19 that changes the taste of cooks and no longer allows them to appreciate the Values required by those who are not sick.

 

C) Formal conclusion of the scientists

Our people is in danger if the prosecutors, struck down by the terrible virus of collective amnesia, begin to give benefits to criminals with secret interviews without Minutes, of which they forget the existence.

The delusions of Prosecutor Cottier show that it is not enough to obtain a judgment of the Federal Court, which says in substance that the lawyer must disobey the Bar President, so that the victims of crimes, committed with the interventions of the Bar President, do not suffer damage, like Senator PLR, Philippe BAUER, decreed it.

Parliament must take seriously the damage caused by the collective amnesia virus, the acute form of which cannot be eradicated, by putting in place a law that decrees the end of the epidemic.

No one can ignore that this terrible virus, responsible for the delusions of Prosecutor Cottier and the secret keeping of the Minutes of this interview of June 12, 2002, may have caused the death of Mr. Penel, by those who launched this Virus. It would be murder, as a dissident lawyer claims.

=> It was time for the National Council Plenum to refuse to muzzle scientists by stressing that :

« We cannot legislate an end to an epidemic, we must fight it »

The President of the Federal Assembly was informed of the situation: Read more:

210310DE_AA

210310DE_AA

020616DE_JS

210309-MSN

051217DP_GC

03.03.21 WHAT MUST BE DONE BY UBS’S CEO IF THE EXTRAORDINARY FEDERAL PROSECUTOR HAS CONFIRMED THAT HE DOES NOT HAVE THE JURISDICTION TO DEAL WITH CRIMES COMMITTED WITH THE INTERVENTIONS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE BAR

The days of Bradley Birkenfeld and Marcel OSPEL are over.

The prestigious school of Michael LAUBER being affected with the terrible disease of Michael LAUBER, which is collective amnesia, the consequences are the following:

The CEO of UBS inherits the procedures that have made the glory of the Swiss justice but that have become toxic like those described by Bradley Birkenfeld!

Ralph HAMER

Ralph HAMERS
UBS CEO

He cannot ignore the fact that the Swiss Confederation no longer has an Attorney General as a result of this terrible illness that struck Michael LAUBER..

He cannot ignore the fact that Senator P. Bauer did not foresee that UBS clients could suffer damage if their lawyer refuses to disobey the President’s Bar!

UBS’S NEW CEO, WHO KNOWS BRADLEY BIRKENFELD’S CHILDISH WAYS OF CIRCUMVENTING THE CONSTITUTION, IS ENTITLED TO OPEN DOORS ON THE PRESTIGIOUS METHODS USED BY OUR HIGHEST PROSECUTORS TO CIRCUMVENT RIGHTS GUARANTEEED BY THE CONSTITUTION, SUCH AS THOSE OF MICHAEL LAUBER, JACQUES RAYROUD, ERIC COTTIER, JEAN-MARC SCHWENTER, THAT MADE THE FORTUNE OF PATRICK FOETISCH WITH HIS POWERFUL BROTHERHOOD

For the younger generation, who has never had the privilege of having an interview with the General Prosecutor, Jean-Marc SCHWENTER, and who has never been informed by Eric COTTIER, his successor, about the proceedings of these interviews, where Jean-Marc Prosecutor received the litigants with red carpet welcome, .... , we ask you to read the minutes of one of those great Moments of anthology that made the glory of the Vaudois Parliament.

It was the great time, when lawyers had to stay outside in front of the office of the General Prosecutor who was only concerned with the well-being of the members of the Brotherhood of Patrick Foetisch by kindly receiving the litigants :

To read and relive here one of these unforgettable moments of anthology :

Exhibit : 020616DE_JM

It is over.

The General Prosecutor Eric COTTIER tried to innovate with his clever procedure so that a litigant does not receive his Court Orders.

It is recalled that Eric COTTIER states that if he sends an order by mail A, and the Post office does not return the mail A, then he has the formal proof that the defendant received it.

But a lawyer from the CAP explained that this procedure did not work. The Prosecutor Eric COTTIER had forgotten to say that if he did not post the Court Order then the post office could not return it to him, moreover the postmen do not have the duty to return a mail A which the recipient did not receive....

This is a toxic procedure for a CEO of a bank who has to empty a client’s account to finance organized crime with a method that is not legal according to a CAP lawyer.

This is all the more toxic, since the extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, appointed to deal with crime committed with the interventions of the Bar Officers, said:

« Its mandate does not confer to him any jurisdiction to judge the obligation of a lawyer to have the defence of a client override any directives or injunctions of a President of the BAR »

.....The Prosecutor Eric COTTIER knew like this Federal Prosecutor that he did not have this competence....He knew that he had no right to write Court Orders, even if his clever procedure made that the defendant did not receive them and would never have knowledge of them. It is observed that Jean-Marc Schwenter never made such an act of forfeiture. On contrary, he received the litigants with a big ceremony worthy of an Alcapone!

To discover the Challenge of Ralph HAMERS so that UBS is not complicit in organized crime and such acts of forfeiture, by applying obsolete and toxic procedures:

Exhibit : 210304DE_RH

210304DE_RH
24.02.21 SENTENCE AND BENEFITS RECEIVED BY MAGISTRATE P. MAUDET MAKE SENATOR PHILIPPE BAUER REACT ON FUTURE TRANSPARENCY ACT

See TJ 19h30, 23.02.21

The Tenor of the Neuchâtelois Bar, Senator Philippe BAUER, is aware that candidates for elections may receive hidden benefits, other than funding, that distort the elections. He wants all these benefits to be visible with the new Transparency Act

See Tj 19h30, 23.02.21

Philippe BAUER
Senator P. BAUER
Tenor of the
Neuchâelois BAR

 

WHO KNOWS THAT A FEDERAL PROSECUTOR HAS NO JURISDICTION TO JUDGE THE DUTY OF A LAWYER TO OVERRIDE THE DEFENCE OF A CLIENT AGAINST POSSIBLE DIRECTIONS AND INJUNCTIONS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE BAR? THIS IS A CONSIDERABLE AND UNFAIR ADVANTAGE AVAILABLE TO CANDIDATES IN ELECTIONS TO MEMBERS OF LAWYERS' ASSOCIATIONS

The Senator Philippe BAUER is aware that to win an election, an injunction of the President of the BAR, against which a Prosecutor can do nothing, is a hidden advantage to the people that can be disloyal or even criminal.

The well-known example given by this Senator

In 2009, this Tenor of the Neuchâtel Bar had obtained a judgment from the TF which said in substance that the lawyer must disobey the President of the BAR to preserve the fundamental rights of his client guaranteed by the Constitution in the context of a crime, where members of the BAR associations are stakeholders.

This Tenor of the Neuchâtel Bar had not specified that, if the lawyer did not dare to disobey the President of the BAR for fear of reprisals, his client could be robbed by his Confreres before Courts whose power was reduced.

He omitted to say that federal prosecutors, such as Michael LAUBER or Jacques RAYROUD, did not have the jurisdiction to have the defence of the lawyer’s client override any instructions or injunctions given by the President of the BAR to the lawyer's client.

It was an advantage, which the members of his brotherhood enjoyed, that allowed them, for example, to eliminate competing candidates in elections with hidden advantages.

Observation

The text of the Transparency Act - which mentions all the benefits offered to members of the Order of Lawyers - has not yet been published.

To be continued

 
17.02.21 ALAIN BERSET WANTS TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE PARLIAMENTARY EXPERT WHO WAS CENSORED AFTER HAVING LAUNCHED THE ALARM ON CRIMES COMMITTED BY MEMBERS OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION

The press criticized Alain Berset for not listening to Covid-19 experts

He reacts well by worrying about the censorship exercised on the expert of the Vaudois Parliament

Alain BERSET

Alain BERSET
Federal Councillor

He is concerned about state censorship of an expert appointed to prevent a new killing of Zug

AFTER NOT LISTENING TO THE EXPERTS WHO WERE LAUNCHING THE ALARM FOR THE SECOND WAVE OF COVID-19, ALAIN BERSET WANTS TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE CENSORED VAUDOIS PARLIAMENT EXPERT FOR HAVING LAUNCHED THE ALARM ON CRIMES COMMITTED WITH THE INTERVENTIONS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE BAR AS EXPLAINED BY SENATOR PHILIPPE BAUER

According to the press, the second wave of Covid-19 could have been less deadly if the experts had been listened to by Alain Berset

See article 20 minutes

For another issue concerning respect for Life:

Alain BERSET knows that Senator Philippe BAUER has said that lawyers must disobey the President of the Bar in order to ensure that the fundamental rights of their clients, guaranteed by the Constitution, are not violated, see comments below dated 06.01.21

Alain Berset understood the lesson given by the Press. He is the first Federal Councillor to worry about the censorship exercised on the expert of the Vaudois Parliament, Me de Rougemont, who warned the authorities that the crimes committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the bar could provoke a new killing of Zug.

He has delegated his collaborators to clarify this case of expert censored by the State.

Since an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor has already been appointed to deal with the issue of crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the bar, nothing has yet filtered.

We can only salute the courage of Alain BERSET who want to break the LAW OF SILENCE on this censorship exercised on an expert.

See exhibit 210211DE_IB

051217DP_GC

210211DE_IB

10.02.21 STATE FRAUD WITH SECURITIES FRAUD :

AN OFFICIAL REQUIRES THE CHURCH TO GET INVOLVED TO SIGN A DEPARTURE CERTIFICATE

Vincent GOUMAZ, tax officer, skillfully appeals to the church to judge the economic crime committed with the Interventions of the Presidents of the bar

Avocat dissident

The remarkable Confederate
Dissident lawyer
Whistleblower

'

Prosecutors Michael LAUBER and Jacques RAYROUD will have to disclose to the ecclesiastical authorities the result of their investigation on the dissident lawyer, see below the comments dated 26.06.19



VINCENT GOUMAZ, TAX OFFICER, HEARD THE ALERT ISSUED FROM THE DISSIDENT LAWYER:

HE MADE A SECURITY FRAUD TO FORCE THE CHURCH TO INTERVENE IN THIS CASE OF CRIME COMMITTED BY MEMBERS OF A MASONIC LODGE

Monsieur Vincent Goumaz, facing a challenge worthy of Ninja Warrior, had a brilliant idea to fight fairly Jacques RAYROUD, one of the best students trained by the prestigious school of Michael LAUBER.

Forced to establish a security fraud to charge ecclesiastical taxes with procedures that cannot take into account the crimes committed with the interventions of Presidents of the BAR, Vincent Goumaz sued for debt Dr.Erni, who did not want to pay for Securities Fraud which is used to finance organized crime by a masonic lodge, of which Jacques RAYROUD and the Prosecutor Eric COTTIER are accomplices.

Unsurprisingly, Dr. Erni has :

1) on the one hand opposes the prosecution with the following motivation  :

Security Fraud, crime case committed with the interventions of the President of the Bar and procedural codes which are not applicable. To verify that the State has informed the synod !

2) On the other hand he announced that he was leaving the church immediately considering that the role of the church is not to cover up crimes committed by a masonic lodge.

Skillfully, Mr. Vincent GOUMAZ pointed out that it is impossible to leave the church without an attestation signed by its leaders.

See exhibit 210202VG_DE

Consequence : The Church will be obliged to judge the Security Fraud which serves to finance the members of a masonic lodge and the manner in which the Prosecutor Jacques RAYROUD, from the famous school of Michael LAUBER, respects human rights and the values of the New Testament of Fribourg

See exhibit 210210DE_VG

210210DE_VG
03.02.21 DISTURBING BUG FOR MARCH 7 VOTE ON THE NAKED FACE INITIATIVE:

THE PEOPLE CANNOT VOTE ON PARLIAMENT’S COUNTER-PROJECT FOR THE INITIATIVE WITH A BAN ON COVERING HIS FACE IN PUBLIC

 

IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE NOT TO HAVE THE RIGHT TO ACCEPT OR REJECT THE COUNTER-PROJECT OF THE PARLIAMENT

 

ALAIN BERSET DESCRIBED IN A SPEECH THIS COUNTER-PROJECT WHICH DOES NOT ALLOW THE STATUS QUO TO BE MAINTAINED IN THE EVENT THAT THE INITIATIVE IS REFUSED

Listen here February 1st speech by Alain BERSET

=> in case of rejection of the initiative, there is a bug that does not allow to obtain the status quo for those who are not allowed to strip their face.

 

Consequences of the counter-project

If the initiative is refused, the counter-project imposed by the Parliament allows people with veiled faces to be counted and registered by the Authorities, whereas if :

"individuals may not hide their faces, as required by the initiative",

Individuals or believer will not be subjected to this surveillance and enslavement imposed by members of the Authorities, with the counter-project.

=> People with veiled faces will be legally monitored and registered with the counter project, and those who are forced to wear the veil will not be protected. Those who force them to wear the veil will be protected !

Observation #1:

The face hidden in public is a correct dress in Islamic country, which is contrary to Swiss values


Unknown with face veiled in public in a city

The believer who hides her face must obey a divine Master, or a husband. This constraint will lead the State to record her name and to list it as shown in the Parliament’s counter-project.

Observation #2:

The completely naked body in public is a proper dress in India for a sadhu, contrary to Swiss Values


Sadhu in proper public dress in the city

There is no dress code for sadhus monks:

The ascetic SADHUS do not hide their face nor their body. They have the freedom to walk completely naked in the cities.

DRESS CODES ARE INTENDED TO IMPOSE VALUES BY THOSE WHO PUT THEM IN PLACE. THIS IS THE CASE FOR THE NAKED FACE INITIATIVE, WHICH SEEKS TO IMPOSE THE VALUE OF TRANSPARENCY:

ONE OF THE VALUES, WHICH MAKES IT POSSIBLE TO PROTECT HUMAN RIGHTS, IS THE TRANSPARENCY ON THE OCCULT CONSTRAINT EXERTED ON CITIZENS WITH DRESS CODES

WHOSE WHO WANT TO BE FREE SHOULD FOLLOW THE WISDOM OF THE INDIAN SADHUS.

CITIZENS MUST ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE ON PARLIAMENT’S COUNTER-PROJECT WHICH DOES NOT RESPECT THE VALUE OF TRANSPARENCY AND THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN FORCED TO WEAR THE VEIL

 

THE EXAMPLE OF THE WISDOM OF THE SADHUS OF INDIA, WHO DO NOT STRIP THEMSELVES COMPLETELY IN SWITZERLAND WHEN THEY CAN DO IT IN THE INDIES, SHOWS THE STIGMATIZING SIDE OF THE COUNTER-PROJECT

In India, the SADHUS are yogi monks highly respected by the people and the Authorities..

They are not subject to any dress code. They are very respectful of other citizens. The most ascetic of them walk completely naked, as they came into the world.

If they would come to Switzerland and walk naked in the streets, they would be called exhibitionists, because Christian Values do not allow naked walks in cities, and they would be registered !

In practice, when they come to Switzerland, the SADHUS do not strip themselves completely, because they know that the majority of Swiss would not allow them to have the freedom of clothing they have in India!

By the wisdom of their behaviour, according to the country where they are located, the SADHUS show on the one hand the importance of this Value which is transparency, which is partially hindered by the dress codes in Switzerland, and on the other hand the importance of this Value which is the respect of the dress code of the country where they are located, which they also respect in Switzerland by not completely stripping themselves.

The Sadhus set an example by respecting the Swiss Values, when they come to Switzerland, which are neither those of their country that allow them to walk completely naked, nor those of the believers of Islamic countries forced not to be able to strip their faces. They are an example of wisdom for Parliament!

 

THE DANGER TO THE SWISS PEOPLE OF NOT BEING ABLE TO VOTE ON THE PARLIAMENT’S COUNTER-PROJECT, WHICH DOES NOT RESPECT SWISS HUMAN RIGHTS AND VALUES.

Reminder:

Values of Islamist countries allow clitoral excision, polygamy and submission of women to men.

The Swiss Constitution guarantees equality before the law to all Swiss citizens. If a single citizen had their rights violated, the state should protect them.

Details provided by one Federal Councillor on this counter-project

The Federal Councillor suggests that these women, who are under the influence of a religion or a husband, freely wear the veil, which seems contradictory at best !

See RTS REPLAY/forum speech Federal Councillor of 19 January 2021

 

The obligation for the Parliament to respect the fundamental rights of all Swiss citizens

For defenders of the Values of the Constitution, if one child or one Swiss woman has her fundamental rights violated, Parliament must protect them.

The counter-project that puts veiled believers under surveillance, without protecting them, should be subject to the vote of the people.

If the counter-project is imposed by Parliament to the Swiss people, it could encourage rich foreigners, or husbands, to impose the veil on women who travel or live in Switzerland.

With a counter-project, which has not been approved by the people, the members of the Authorities, who will have the right to monitor these veiled people, will have too much power. They could abuse this power, to cover cases of gross human rights violations, by powerful people, magistrates and husbands who discriminate against women.

Of the experience of the past that must not be forgotten

Switzerland has the sad reputation of having put in place crazy codes of procedures that no longer allow to respect fundamental rights

See Article of 7 April 2016 Of hebdo paper

Senator Philippe BAUER has already explained that there is a procedure hidden from the public, which provides that a lawyer must disobey the President of the Bar to protect the rights of a client, who is the object of a false denunciation. See comments below, dated 23.12.20.

The people cannot know this process of discrimination of citizens by the State with the power of the President of the Bar and the links that bind them to the magistrates.

If now, without the approval of the people, Parliament sets up a counter-project to monitor women, who under the influence of a religion, a husband or a "master", cannot strip their faces, there is a major bug in this vote that has not received the approval of the people.

Like the victims of crimes committed with lawyers who do not want to disobey the Bar Presidents, these women will have their fundamental rights violated with procedures that do not allow the authorities to respect the rights of the people.

We must accept the initiative to protect the rights of all citizens in order to prevent this counter-project, which has a bug, from being imposed to the people without their consent.

 
20.01.27 THE MOTTO :

TOO SMALL TO BE RESPECTED

SHOUD NOT BE PART OF THE VALUES OF UBS TO SPOLIATE SMALL CLIENT ACCOUNTS WITH THE INTERVENTIONS OF THE BAR PRESIDENTS

See exhibit : 210127DE_RH

It is the challenge of Ralph HAMERS, new CEO of UBS, to ensure that the bank’s procedures do not make it possible to circumvent compliance with the Constitution, even under the constraint of members of brotherhoods of lawyers.

Ralph HAMERS

Ralph HAMERS
UBS CEO

THE EXPERIENCE OF THE MOTTO :

TOO BIG TO FAIL

WITH THE LECON GIVEN BY THE AMERICAN SENATE, MUST ALLOW RALPH HAMERS TO SET UP PROCEDURES THAT RESPECT THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION ON LINE WITHOUT PLUNDERING THE ASSETS OF SMALL CLIENTS WITH THE INTERVENTIONS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE BAR

Ralph HAMERS, the new CEO of UBS, discovers in Switzerland, that if a lawyer refuses to disobey the President of the Bar, then his bank has a flawed procedure that allows members of a criminal organization, who are professionals of the law, to finance oneself on the backs of UBS clients by asking to make seizures with Securities obtained fraudulently with the relations that bind the Order of Lawyers to the Courts.

The modus operandi of the criminal organization is known. It would have been admired by Bradley Birkenfeld:

  1. Members of the criminal organization, to cover their economic crime, falsely accuse a citizen of their crime, whose lawyer is the one witness to this crime and the falsity of the accusation.
  2. At the Court, the President of the Bar forbids the lawyer, the one witness to the crime, to be able to testify
  3. The citizen, the victim of the economic crime, has no way of proving the falsehood of the charge, because the sole witness was forbidden to testify. He is dispossessed by a flawed judgment, where his rights are violated by the Presidents of the Bar with their relationship with the judgess.
  4. Members of the criminal organization ransom the victim of the economic crime by obtaining fraudulent securities based on this economic crime that is impossible to deny

Ralph HAMERS has all the elements in hand to put in place procedures that ensure live compliance with the Constitution without being polluted by the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar.

See exhibit: 210127DE_RH

To be followed !

210127DE_RH
20.01.21 WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY COVID-19 OR THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE LAWYER REFUSING TO DISOBEY TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE BAR?

Alain BERSET breaks the law of silence for the damage caused by Covid-19.

He is made aware that the victims of COVID-19 are experiencing the same experience as the victims of the crimes committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the bar.

Alain BERSET

Alain BERSET
FEDERAL COUNCILLOR
MINISTER OF HEALTH

 

He faces a more serious scourge than Covid-19: it is the damage caused by the lawyer who refuses to disobey the President of the bar

Even if it is impossible to eradicate this scourge worse than Covid-19, Alain BERSET has shown that the Federal Council can compensate the victims.

 

ALAIN BERSET BREAKS THE LAW OF SILENCE FOR COVID-19 DAMAGE:

"IT IS NOT THE VICTIMS OF THE DAMAGE WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE. THEY ARE NOT AT FAULT FOR WHAT HAPPENS!"

Quote: (Interview A. Berset, TJ 19h30 /13.01.2021)

" les magasins, les restaurants, les centres culturels, les institutions culturelles, les institutions de temps libre, ne sont pas responsables, ne sont pas fautives de ce qui arrive "

Alain BERSET is made aware that in the case of the damages caused by the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR, the current Senator, Philippe BAUER, had explained in 2009 that the victims of the damages were not responsible or at fault.

The damage came only from the fact that their lawyer had refused to disobey the President of the Bar.

 

Observation for the damage caused by the covid-19

Scientists cannot explain how COVID-19 was born or how it works. It is not clear that the vaccine will stop the deaths and damage caused by COVID-19.

At least covid-19 has made the Federal Council aware of its virus power:  it can act as a President of the Bar who prevents the one witness of a crime from testifying, ...., and it may cause damage similar to that caused by the lawyer who refuses to disobey this President of the Bar, who prohibited the lawyer from testifying to the crime he witnessed.

 

Observation for the damage caused by the lawyer who refuses to disobey the President of the Bar

Senator Philippe BAUER was able to explain how the refusal of a lawyer to disobey the President of the Bar creates damage comparable to that created by Covid-19. However, there is no vaccine to put an end to the actions of the Presidents of the Bars.

In 2016, a lawyer said that it was impossible to break the law of silence on the damage caused by the lawyer who refuses to disobey the President of the Bar, in the context described by the request for a parliamentary inquiry.

See exhibit: 051217DP_GC

In this case a CEO was threatened by members of a criminal organization.

The damage caused by COVID-19 shows that the government can change procedures, even the economic model, when it knows the cause of damage. It can also determine responsibilities and compensate victims who are not responsible.

Even if Senator Philippe BAUER has no solutions to avoid the damage caused by the lawyer who refuses to disobey the President of the Bar, Alain BERSET knows that he can already say that the victims are not responsible, they are not at fault for what is happening and he can compensate them!

See exhibit 210121DE_PS

 

210121DE_PS
13.01.21 A SHAMAN ASKS FIVE QUESTIONS TO VAUD PARLIAMENTARIANS TO ENABLE THEM TO MONITOR COMPLIANCE WITH THEIR OATH

During each plenary session of the Vaudois Parliament, the President of the Parliament reminds each to each deputies that they have taken an Oath and that some are waiting for the divine blessing for their work done under Oath

Sonia BUTERA

SONYA BUTERA
PRESIDENT
VAUD PARLIAMENT

Expl. Session of 27.10.2020

Quote: « Je rappelle à chacune et chacun d’entre vous le serment que nous avons prêté  et pour celle et ceux que pour qui cela revêt de l’importance, j’invoque la bénédiction divine pour nos travaux. »

Expl. Other sessions

 

THE METHOD OF CONTROL OF THE OATH COMPLIANCE

A SHAMANE gives each deputy a method so that he can check whether their work respects his Oath and the divine will.

Eric COTTIER and François DANTHE, TWO PROSECUTORS, ELECTED BY THESE DEPUTIES, SHOW THE RESULT OF THE WORK OF PARLIAMENT AND OF THE PROCEDURES THAT DEPUTIES HAVE THEM FOLLOW, WHICH MUST RESPECT HUMAN RIGHTS AND SHOULD BE DIVINE FOR A PART OF THE ELECTED MEMBERS

 

WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO RESPECT HUMAN RIGHTS ?

Our people have defined these fundamental rights in the Constitution, it has provided article 35 that enforce prosecutors and deputies to respect them

See : Fundamental rights Constitution

Duties of Deputies and Prosecutors: article 35 Cste

 

RESULTS OF THE DIVINE WORKS

Two sworn Prosecutors, Eric COTTIER and François DANTHE, understood that: what matters is the result.

They show to the members of the Parliament how the procedures, that each Member of Parliament make them follow to accomplish their work, enable them to respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution in a divine way for a part of the elected deputies.

For example :

Eric COTTIER shows that the procedures, put in place by the Parliament for the litigant to receive his court orders, has the result that the litigant do not receive them. On the other hand, Eric COTTIER shows that these procedures allows him to quote, in his court order, the existence of a lawyer determinations that he has not received!

Exhibit: 201229DE_JS

François DANTHE shows that these procedures have the quality to serve the interests of a criminal organization and to recall the observations of the expert of the Parliament, Me de ROUGEMONT, on the killing of Zug in this year of commemoration

Exhibit : 201229DE_JS

 

WHAT IT MEANS FOR PROSECUTORS AND DEPUTIES: TO RESPECT HUMAN RIGHTS WITH THESE RESULTS GIVEN BY THE APPLICATION OF THEIR PROCEDURES

A Shaman, who predicted the attack on New York, proposes to the prosecutors and members of Parliament, to answer 5 questions - which concern all humans - to check that human rights are respected with the application of their procedures :

1)   Why does man exist ?
2)   What is my destinity ?
3)   Do the forces of evil exist ?

....

see important information to members of Parliament/ respect of the Values of the Constitution by the Public Prosecutor /...

210113DE_GC
06.01.21 ANYONE WHO DISOBEYS THE PRESIDENT OF THE BAR TO BREAK THE LAW OF SILENCE COULD BE IN DANGER OF DEATH AS JULIAN ASSANGE IS IN DANGER OF DEATH IF HE IS EXTRADITED TO THE USA

See TJ 19h30, of 04.01.2021

The General Prosecutor, Eric COTTIER, can confirm that in 2002, the Director of ICSA, Mr. Penel, represented a danger for Patrick FOETISCH, Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA, following the disappearance by the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Canton of Vaud of documents proving unfair management.

Pierre PENEL

Pierre Penel
Foetisch’s right-hand
Director of ICSA

He died suddenly, without reason, after Eric COTTIER had established that Foetisch had violated the copyright with a contract that had been cancelled

SENATOR PHILIPPE BAUER ARGUED IN 2009 THAT THE ONE WITNESS OF A FALSE DENONCIATION HAD TO BREAK THE LAW OF SILENCE IMPOSED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE BAR TO PROTECT HIS CLIENT’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. THE SUDDEN DEATH OF FOETISCH’S RIGHT-HAND SHOWS THAT THIS ONE WITNESS MAY BE IN DANGER OF DEATH

The Presidents of the Bar and former Presidents of the Bar such as Senator Philippe BAUER and Me Christian BETTEX, lawyer of the State of Vaud, are aware that the codes of procedure contain delirious procedures which do not allow to respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.

See newspaper of 7 April 2016 of the HEBDO

As a delirious procedure, we have seen that the President of the Bar may forbid a lawyer, one witness of a false denunciation involving members of the Order of Lawyers, to testify. In this case, the lawyer’s client will have his life destroyed if the lawyer who wanted to testify refuses to do so because of the ban made by the President of the Bar.

We saw on this site that Senator Philippe BAUER did not find as illegal, this discrimination of citizens with this delirious procedure. He simply said that the lawyer, one witness, must disobey the President of the Bar if he does not want his client’s fundamental rights to be violated.

We saw on this site on 23.12.2020, that the senator, Philippe BAUER, even obtained a judgment from the FEDERAL COURT in 2009, which confirmed that the lawyer, member of the Order of Lawyers, had to disobey the President of the Bar and break the law of silence imposed by the President of the Bar to safeguard the fundamental rights of his client.

Senator Bauer failed to mention the risks for a lawyer, one witness, who disobeys an authority as powerful as that of a President of the Bar.

Observation

The General Prosecutor, Eric COTTIER, who knows the case well, should have asked for the right of reply on this site to expose these risks.

He could have explained that if Me Burnet had disobeyed the President of the Bar : Me Burnet could attest by testimony that the Public Prosecutor of the Canton of Vaud had made disappear the exhibits to prove the unfair management of Foetisch.

It is not excluded that Mr. Penel died because of these exhibits that disappeared, which would have allowed to indict Foetisch.

Therefore Mr.Burnet could have been in danger of death by testifying, while the President of the Bar had forbidden him to do it.

It is likely that the British judges, unlike the Federal Court, would not have agreed with Senator BAUER. They would have deemed unlawful the prohibition made by the President of the Bar to the witness to testify, instead of saying that he must disobey the President of the Bar and risk his life for having broken the law of silence imposed by the President of the Bar....

To read :  210106DE_PS

210106DE_PS
2021 OBJECTIVES MAKING TRANSPARENT THE SECRET ACTIONS OF MAGISTRATES AND ELECTED OFFICIALS WHO CONTINUE TO IMPOSE THE LAW OF SILENCE IN ORDER TO VIOLATE HUMAN RIGHTS WITH DELIRIOUS PROCEDURES AND HAVE THEM REMOVED  

 

2021

 

HAPPY NEW YEAR

 

BEST OF HEALTH WISHES TO ALL OUR READERS

 

 

2020

 

REVIEW OF THE YEAR

SLOGAN

 

THANKS

 

CITIZENS HAVE MADE CLEAR THAT THE SILENCE OF ELECTED OFFICIALS IS NO LONGER AN OPTION FOR THOSE WHO HAVE TOO MUCH POWER AND DO NOT WANT TO UPHOLD THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION

COVID-19 HAS SHOWN THAT DEMOCRACY IS AT RISK IF ELECTED OFFICIALS PUT IN PLACE PROCEDURES THAT DO NOT MEET THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION

 

A BIG THANK-YOU TO CITIZENS WHO HAVE THE COURAGE TO BREAK THE LAW OF SILENCE, INCLUDING THOSE WHO ALLOW THIS INFORMATION SITE TO EXIST

 

 

 
30.12.20 MORE DANGEROUS THAN COVID-19 ALERT TO DGAIC:

TO PASS A JUDGMENT, ERIC COTTIER CLAIMS TO HAVE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT SECRET DETERMINATIONS, WHICH WERE ON THE COMPUTER OF A LAWYER, WHO HAD NOT SENT THEM YET

A request for reimbursement of penal expenses by an employee of the DGAIC, to cover the crime committed with the interventions of the President of the BAR, highlights the existence of the judgment of Eric COTTIER, above mentioned, which was rendered collectively with two other senior magistrates of the State of Vaud. There were therefore three magistrates who knew in an illicit way, or by a paranormal phenomenon, these secret determinations!

The General Director of the DGAIC has become witness of this procedural scam, with the alleged intervention of the State Espionage Service, which violates the respect for fundamental rights guaranteed by Article 35 of the Swiss Constitution.

This is a false Title made collectively by magistrates, since Eric COTTIER and his colleagues could not mention the existence of these determinations which were secret on a lawyer’s computer disk, and of which they could, without spying, not legally know the existence, when they wrote the judgment.

See exhibit 201229DE_JS

Me Jean-Luc Schwaar
Me Jean-Luc Schwaar
DGAIC Director

This experienced lawyer is a member of the Swiss Law Society Committee.

He has the same competence as the expert of Parliament, Me François de ROUGEMONT, who has dealt with the request for a parliamentary inquiry in this matter.

See exhibit : 051217DP_GC

 

THE GENERAL DIRECTOR OF DGAIC, Me JEAN-LUC SCHWAAR, WITNESSED A PARANORMAL COLLECTIVE FALSE TITLE, PARANORMAL :

IT IS INEXPLICABLE THAT ERIC COTTIER COULD TAKE ACCOUNT IN A JUDGMENT OF DETERMINATIONS THAT HAD NOT BEEN SENT TO HIM YET! IT CAN ALSO BE A SCAM SET UP BY SENIOR JUDGES WITH THE INFORMATION OBTAINED BY THE STATE SPY SERVICE… TO PROVIDE BENEFITS TO MEMBERS OF BROTHERHOODS OF LAWYERS IN THE CONTEXT OF CRIME COMMITTED WITH THE INTERVENTIONS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE BARS

Me Jean-Luc Schwaar knows that justice is completely paralyzed with the introduction of new delirious procedures.

See article 160407hebdo

Me François de ROUGEMONT, the expert of the Parliament, said that it would be necessary to record all the judicial hearings with video cameras to put an end to the practices that make us shudder described in the request for parliamentary investigation,

See page 2, exhibit 071116DP_GC

Everyone will appreciate that if the court hearing - where Eric COTTIER claims with his colleagues to have taken into consideration the secret determinations - had been filmed, we would know these determinations and we would know how he obtained them!

 

BREACH OF PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES WITH PROCEDURES THAT ARE HIDDEN FROM THE PEOPLE, OR EVEN DO NOT EXIST

The witness, Mr. Schwaar, has been notified of the reason why his DGAIC staff must claim CHF 500 from Dr. Erni. The reason is that Dr ERNI reported that a lawyer from the CAP Legal Insurance said that the Prosecutor applied a procedure that does not exist, to protect criminal, quote :

"On the internet link above, you have been able to take note of the new procedure applied by Eric COTTIER to give benefits to third parties. He does so when he knows that the procedural codes are not applicable and that he commits an act of forfeiture by applying such a procedure.

You saw that the CAP legal counsel was adamant:  « the procedure applied by Eric COTTIER does not exist ».

See exhibit 201229DE_JS

The witness, Me Schwaar, also knows that Eric COTTIER, with two high magistrates, pronounced a judgment claiming to have taken into account secret determinations, found in the computer of the lawyer of Dr Erni, that the latter had not yet sent and of which they could not know the content

The witness, Me Schwaar, also knows that Me de ROUGEMONT said that the codes of procedures were not applicable to treat the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR

The witness, Mr. Schwaar, also knows that Senator Philippe BAUER said that witnesses, members of the Order of Lawyers, forbidden to testify by the President of the BAR, must disobey him so that the fundamental rights of their clients are not violated,

The witness, Me Schwaar, as the expert Me of ROUGEMONT must be able to answer the question of whether the President of the Bar can authorize the Prosecutor Eric COTTIER to spy on the computer of the lawyer of Dr Erni, or if this procedure does not exist! The question has not been submitted to the CAP Legal Insurance lawyer !

In any case, the director of the DGAIC can explain to the Parliament and the Council of State, that the codes of procedures are not applicable to treat the crime committed with the interventions of the President of the BAR, as had explained Me De ROUGEMONT, the expert of the Parliament.

It is obvious that the Prosecutor DANTHE, who charges CHF 500, for the procedure that does not exist that ERIC COTTIER is applying, cannot ignore it. This Prosecutor could be a member of the masonic lodge which would be at the origin of the false denunciation described in the request for parliamentary investigation

Me Schwaar can also remind the PARLIAMENT that Me de ROUGEMONT was hired to avoid a new killing of ZOUG. He said that these thrilling practices observed by the public could cause a new killing of Zug

This is an observation from a experienced lawyer who knows the relationships between lawyers and the courts!

201229DE_JS
23.12.20 AT A JUDGMENT HEARING, A COMPUTER OBEYS THE SIGNS OF THE MEMBERS OF A MACONIC LODGE TO HELP THE PRESIDING OFFICER WHO DOES NOT WANT TO DISOBEY THE PRESIDENT OF THE BAR

The prankster computer (or tetanised by fear) simulates a breakdown in the trial to erase a testimony forbidden by the President of the Bar.

See anecdote on page 2 of the following letter:

Exhibit : 201222DE_SS

The public, who witnessed this hearing, filed a request for a parliamentary inquiry that immortalized the interventions of the President of the Bar.

To read : 051217DP_GC

A member of the public, freemason, witness of this judgment hearing, like the computer, recognized secret signs of members of a masonic lodge… He revealed it to the public, who announced himself as a witness to these judicial practices that make us shudder...

The failure of the prankster computer was immortalized during the processing of the request for investigation, thanks to the testimony gathered by the expert of Parliament..

See exhibit : 070116DP_FR

Me Philippe BAUER

Me Philippe BAUER
Former President of the Bar
National Councillor PLR

MMe Philippe BAUER, our national councillor, specialist in judicial affairs and surveillance of justice, obtained, as a former President of the Bar, a judgment of the Federal Court which said :

"the witness should have disobeyed the President of the BAR to enforce fundamental rights"

…in practice the witness did not want to disobey the President of the BAR

=> As a result, the fundamental rights of victims have been violated and criminals are still at large….

PHILIPPE BAUER IS ONE OF THOSE PERSONALITIES WHO HAVE A GREAT POWER, AS A NATIONAL COUNCILLOR, A MEMBER OF THE COMMITTEE ON STATE LEGAL AFFAIRS, AND ALSO A MEMBER OF THE DELEGATION OF THE MANAGEMENT COMMITTEES WHICH SPIES. HE PRESENTS HIMSELF AS A HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER WITH NO TRANSPARENCY ABOUT THE SOLUTIONS HE PROPOSES.

Recently the majority of Swiss citizens have accepted the initiative on responsible multinationals, so that the human rights of the weakest are respected by those who have too much power.

National Councillor Philippe BAUER, who presents himself as a human rights defender guaranteed by the Federal Constitution, was against the initiative, but did not propose any solutions to ensure respect for the human rights of the weakest.

See interview RTS

The result of the votes showed that the majority of the people do not trust Philippe Bauer for his inaction as National Advisor on the violation of human rights by those who have too much power.

 

THE TESTIMONY OF A MEMBER OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION, ERASED BY A PRANKSTER COMPUTER DURING A HEARING O JUDGMENT, WHO GAVE PHILIPPE BAUER HIS LETTERS OF NOBILITY AND HIS ENORMOUS POWER

It is especially important to note that Me Philippe BAUER wet his shirt, proposing a new solution to fight against the crime committed with the interventions of the President of the Bar, and this prankster computer which obeys the secret signs of the members of a masonic lodge, at a judgment hearing!

Facts:

In 2005, the President of the TRIBUNAL, Bertrand Sauterel, found himself in distress when the sole witness of a false denunciation, a member of the Order of Lawyers, came to the Tribunal to say that he wanted to testify and that he could not testify, because the President of the Bar forbade him to testify.

The President of the Tribunal had to note this testimony in the Minutes, namely that « the witness wants to testify but says he cannot testify so as not to disobey the President of the Bar” »

At this precise moment, the computer simulates a breakdown and the clerk announces that the testimony has disappeared…., but there were in the room witnesses of the dishonesty of this computer which obeys the secret signs of the members of a masonic lodge.

Me Schaller asked the Court of Neuchâtel to assess by judgment that this prohibition made by the President of the Bar to the witness to testify, violates the rights of the victim. He pointed out that members of brotherhoods have important advantages that they risk losing by disobeying the President of the Bar.

…it was a Bar Association scam where the Bar Officers gave benefits to members of the lodge by prohibiting the witness from testifying…

The Court of Neuchâtel confirmed by judgment that this prohibition on the witness to testify was an unlawful act..

See exhibit 090203CC_DE

Me Philippe BAUER, former President of the Bar, who represented the Bar Association and who knew the request for a parliamentary investigation, understood very well the reason why human rights were violated

Me Philippe BAUER then asked the Federal Court to declare unlawful the judgment of Neuchâtel with the unimaginable argument that the witness, members of the bar association, must disobey the Bar President to protect the fundamental rights of his client

Me Schaller said that it was the duty of the President of the Court to disobey the President of the Bar by declaring unlawful his prohibition made by the President of the BAR to the witness to testify !

The Federal Court ruled in favour of Philippe BAUER. The latter with this exemplary judgment which shows how he supposedly manages to enforce human rights, has received an enormous power related to the actions of the members of this mysterious masonic lodge, which manages to obtain from a computer that it simulates a breakdown during the judgment hearing to erase the testimony of the witness prohibited from testifying by the President of the BAR!

The only blemisch is that the witnesses, members of the Order of Lawyers, do not agree to disobey the BAR PRESIDENT to protect the fundamental rights of their clients. It is a real fraud and violation of human rights according to the rules of good faith !

201222DE_SS

051217DP_GC

070116DP_FR

16.12.20 GREAT ETHICS LESSON OF A PROFESSOR OF MEDICINE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA, MEMBER OF THE COVID-19 TASK FORCE.

We are in the Red Zone. . . . We warned the Federal Council. . . . but does the public not also have the right to know what the situation is?

We also have this role of transparency about the epidemiological situation towards the population

To listen to SAMIA HURST’s message to the TSR journalist who is surprised that scientists communicate to the population the data they communicate to the Federal Council

TJ19h30 of 15.12.2020

Prof. Samia HURST

Samia HURST
Prof. UNI Genève
Physician

Curriculum Vitae

A scientist who reminds that the people, sovereign, has the right to know the data that the magistrates receive to make their decision.

 

Note :

The request for a parliamentary inquiry filed by the Public in 2005 on the relations that bind the Bar Association to the Courts, requested already this transparency for the population!

See exhibit : 051217DP_GC

 

Thanks to Professor Samia HURST for reminding us that trust in the Authorities is based on the transparency of the data provided by scientists to the Authorities and the use made of it by the magistrates and the political world!

GRETA THUNBERG BLAMED POLITICIANS FOR IGNORING SCIENTIFIC DATA AND REPORTS. TODAY SCIENTISTS SAY THAT THE PUBLIC HAS THE RIGHT TO BE INFORMED OF THE RED AREAS IN WHICH THEY ARE LOCATED AND OF THE DATA AND REPORTS THEY PROVIDE TO POLITICIANS

The days of Galilee are over. It is no longer enough for magistrates to assert without evidence that the Earth is still at the center of the UNIVERSE for the scientists - who have shown that this is false - to accept it by whisper as Galileo: «…and yet it turns»

The Crypto case, the Michael Lauber case, the Cottier case, the Jacques Rayroud case, show that it is no longer enough for a magistrate or politicians to say that the codes of procedure ensure transparency and respect for the rights of the population for this to be true!

After Jacques DUBOCHET who wants the population to be informed about the red zone of the climate emergency, it is another scientific authority, Samia Hurst, who wants the people to be properly informed about the red zone of the covid-19

These two leading scientists have a common message :

"the people must have access to the data received by the political world so that they can understand the decisions and verify that these decisions, taken by the political world, respect the Values of the Constitution."

The collective amnesia of the Attorney General of the confederation, with the codes of delirious procedures set up by the legislator, no longer allow to trust decisions taken by the political world, without possible control by the population.

It is recalled here that Switzerland has adopted a new code of procedure to enforce the Values of the Constitution. The only quality of this code is to paralyze justice with delirious procedures, without any transparency, and to make the happiness of criminal organizations:

See the observation made by the professionals of the law:

160407hebdo

After the red zone of the management of covid-19 shown by Samia Hurst, that of the climate emergency shown by Jacques DUBOCHET, two magistrates sound the alarm for the red zone of the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar, by making transparent two practices that thrill allowed by the new code of procedures :

First practice that thrill :

"the invention of an alleged court appeal by a professional of the law"

This is Dina BETI who shows that her Tribunal can violate Article 35 of the Constitution by treating an alleged appeal, by cleverly substituting itself for an independent Tribunal

See exhibit: 201216DE_DB

Second practice that thrill :

"Violation art. 35 Constitution by the Criminal Court"

This is the Deputy Judge of the Criminal Court who confirmed that the judgment of 16 November 2020 grossly violates the respect of Article 35 of the Constitution by not mentioning the essential facts namely that: a criminal complaint is filed against Prosecutor Mooser before an independent Tribunal

See exhibit: 201216DE_JD

In both cases, it is the control of the content of the documents provided by a scientist that shows that the decisions of the magistrates are not related to the existing data.

Without this transparency on the data and reports of scientists provided to politicians, trust in the authorities can no longer exist.

TJ19h30

160407hebdo

201216DE_DB

201216DE_JD

09.12.20 PARALYZED JUSTICE: A LAWYER PROPOSED A SOLUTION TO STOP CRIME COMMITED BY THOSE WHO HAVE TOO MUCH POWER :

"WE MUST RESTORE THE POPULAR JURIES".

In 2016, HEBDO journalist Clément Bürge sounded the alarm in his article dated 7 April about the paralysis of justice with the new Code of Procedures.

160407hebdo

According to a professional of the law, this paralysis is not a coincidence. It is the direct consequence of the suppression of the popular jury, which allows the Prosecutors to serve the interests of those who have too much power.

Eric Cottier

Eric COTTIER
General Prosecutor
State of Vaud

He is one of the prosecutors who applies the delirious procedures that would thrill a popular jury.

IN 2016, A LAWYER EXPLAINED THAT THE PEOPLE’S JURY WAS THE ORGAN AVAILABLE TO THE PEOPLE TO PARTICIPATE IN JUDICIAL DECISIONS AND TO ENSURE THAT THE JUDICIARY RESPECTED ITS CONSTITUTIONAL WILL.

BY ABOLISHING THIS ORGAN, THE LEGISLATOR ABOLISHED THE DIRECT CONTROL OF THE COURTS BY THE PEOPLE.

Sir Clément Bürge quotes in his article that several lawyers deplored the suppression of popular juries.

However, he did not explain that by abolishing this organ which the people had to have to participate in judicial decisions and ensure that the magistrates respected the will of the people, the legislator abolished the direct control of the Courts by the people.

The lawyer, who explains that popular juries must be restored to put an end to the crime committed by those who have too much power, says, quote :

""… since the new Code of Procedure has excluded popular juries, the courts can do anything. The magistrates all became judges and parties at once."

On this site, we quoted one of these new delirious procedures used by the Prosecutor Eric COTTIER, see below comments dated April 15, 2020, namely that :

"To check that the defendant did indeed receive an alleged court order that he sent by mail A, the Prosecutor examines whether the post office returned the mail to him. If the post office did not return the mail to him, then he has the formal proof that the defendant received it!"

…a CAP insurance lawyer said that this procedure does not exist, see comment dated July 8, 2020…

… however Prosecutor Eric COTTIER used it to cover up the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar…

…if there had been a popular jury of citizens who filed the request for a parliamentary inquiry,

... see exhibit : 051217DP_GC

.this jury would have found the gross violation of fundamental rights by this Prosecutor, and it would have been harassed,….

This importance of the popular jury with examples of new delirious procedures was reported to the Parliament in Bern.

Documents were requested from another Prosecutor to clarify another delirious procedure…

See exhibit 201209DE_JS

To be continued !

160407hebdo

051217DP_GC

201209DE_JS

02.12.20 FEDERAL VOTE: THE SWISS PEOPLE, WITH ITS MAJORITY, WANTS ITS AUTHORITIES TO ENSURE RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS WITHOUT YIELDING TO THE ECONOMIC BLACKMAIL OF THOSE WHO HAVE TOO MUCH POWER

The Swiss people, by an absolute majority of their citizens, have said yes to the initiative on responsible multinationals.

The initiative was supported by Dick MARTY, a former Attorney General, who was a member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.

Dick MARTY

Dick Marty
Former Attorney General of Ticino

One of the few former prosecutors, defenders of the values of the Swiss Constitution, who does not believe that it is enough for one who has too much power to say :

“I have respected human rights"

...to make it true.

The people agreed with him against the Federal Council which supported the opposite with a counter-project!

 

 

SILENCE ON HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS WITH ECONOMIC BLACKMAIL IS NO LONGER AN OPTION. DICK MARTY, WHO HAS NOT BEEN INFECTED WITH THE TERRIBLE DISEASE OF MICHAEL LAUBER, ALONG WITH OTHER PERSONALITIES, STRESSED THAT THE PEOPLE CANNOT TRUST THOSE WHO HAVE TOO MUCH POWER AND WHO CAN JUDGE THEIR OWN BEHAVIOUR

Dick MARTY is one of the few prosecutors who has not been infected by the terrible disease of Michael LAUBER which is collective amnesia.

Like the Swiss people, Dick MARTY knows that silence is no longer an option when those who have too much power violate the human rights of the weakest. He showed that the role of prosecutors is to defend human rights rather than allow the strongest to dominate and destroy the lives of the weakest.

The initiative was accepted by the majority of the citizens and rejected by the majority of the Cantons.

Observations of the people for the Federal Council

To read: 201201DE_JS

A multinational (Glencore) tried to put pressure on the vote with a complaint against the initiators of the initiative.

« A citizen observed that the reason Glencore took the liberty of filing a complaint against the initiators of the initiative is that they are certain that our Prosecutors do not respect human rights »

It is neither Michael LAUBER, nor Jacques RAYROUD, nor Eric COTTIER, nor many others, who will deny this reflection of a citizen who is concerned about the functioning of our Public Ministries.

After the scandals of FIFA, Car Postal, Crypto, the crime committed with the interventions of the President of the Bar, the majority of the people have said that they expect the authorities to enforce human rights and to bring to trial those who violate human rights

The people wants full transparency on this economic crime that violates human rights

It is not the one who has violated human rights who has the competence to say that this is not true! Only a neutral and independent authority can establish it !

Observation

After that Presidents of the bar (who benefit from it) have raised the alarm about the codes of delirious procedures that do not allow to respect the Constitution :

See exhibit 160407_hebdo

The Federal Assembly should already provide access to neutral and independent courts free of charge to judge the violation of human rights and crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the bars

See exhibit 201127DE _TA

160407hebdo

201201DE_JS

25.11.20 Vote...... YES
TO THE INITIATIVE FOR RESPONSIBLE MULTINATIONALS

To read exhibit :

201121MC_DE

This is the message sent by Micheline Calmy-Rey to the Swiss citizens, defenders of human rights.

Micheline Calmy-Rey

Micheline Calmy-Rey
Former President of the Federal Council

An INSIDER who knows how lobbies put pressure on the Authorities

AS A FORMER FEDERAL COUNCILLOR, MICHELINE CALMY-REY DISAVOWS THE FEDERAL COUNCIL WHICH HIDES THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS BY MULTINATIONAL CORPORATION LOBBIES

To respect the values of our Constitutional State, she contradicts the Federal Council by saying:

Vote YES to the initiative for responsible multinationals ...

... by making serious charges against those who exercise the law of silence:

Citation:

"Hello ...

I’m not in the habit of appealing as a former federal councillor, but the multinational initiative is very close to my heart...

... Encourage your family and friends to vote YES to the initiative for responsible multinational corporations

...I confess that, for as long as I can remember, I have rarely seen a voting campaign in which so many untruths were propagated on an initiative,...

Full Text : 201121MC_DE

This is a huge slap in the face for the Federal Council, from the part of its former Leader, but a great hope for children and human rights defenders who denounce the corruption and abuses of the authorities who hold power…

After the amnesia of Michael LAUBER and the corruption cases with the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar, it is time that a former Federal Councillor breaks the law of silence imposed on the Authorities by the lobbies and those who have too much power.

201121MC_DE
18.11.20 TWO DECISIONS (HORRORS) OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL COURT REMIND THE PRESIDENT OF THE CONFEDERATION OF THE 5 QUESTIONS OF THE SHAMANESS

1) Do you know why you were born?
2) Do you know what your destiny is?
3) Do you know why you met me?
4) Do you know that in the face of death, you will be alone with full responsibility for the acts of your Life?
5) Do you believe that the forces of evil exist ?

See exhibit 201115DE_JS

Simonetta Sommaruga

Ms Simonetta Sommaruga
Président of the Swiss Confederation

 

 

IN 2001, BEFORE MAGISTRATE ERIC COTTIER PUBLICLY PROVED THAT FOETISCH HAD INFRINGED COPYRIGHT WITH A CONTRACT THAT HAD BEEN CANCELLED, A SHAMANESS ASKED DR ERNI THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: "DO YOU KNOW WHY WE MET AND WHY YOU MET MR. FOETISCH?"

At that time Dr Erni had not yet been blackmailed by the INSIDERS. His CEO had not yet been the subject of coercion by Insiders...

The request for a parliamentary inquiry did not exist. See exhibit :051217DP_GC. Mr. Penel, Foetisch’s right-hand man, had not yet died of poisoning. Mr. Schaller, lawyer, did not yet represent Dr. Erni, and Michael LAUBER was not yet General Prosecutor of the Confederation

However, the Shamaness had already announced to Dr. Erni that Me Foetisch was part of a group of INSIDERS. Inexplicably, she predicted that Dr. Erni would be under enormous pressure from these Insiders. He should unmask state leaders who violate the Values of Life and bring about change to end the violation of fundamental rights.

In 2016, the fate wants that a dissident lawyer, who also talks about Insiders, will lead Dr. Erni to contact the President of the Confederation..

See exhibit 161010DE_SS

Dr. Erni made contact because he is a physicist by profession. Like Galileo, he observes, describes what he sees and confronts it with the people concerned to verify it.

It is inexplicable for a physicist that a Shamaness predicted this fate. On the other hand, Dr Erni observes that if fate wanted to make visible the existence of Insiders who allow legal professionals to commit crimes with impunity, he chose him because he is a physicist. Note that all physicists can do this since it is their job to observe and describe the invisible!

Now it is the turn of Simonetta Sommaruga, who is a pianist, to take measures to put an end to these abominable dissonances caused by these INITIATES with a hidden right to the people.

201115DE_JS
11.11.20 PARLIAMENTARIANS DISCOVER THAT SWITZERLAND HAS A STATE IN THE STATE

Michael Lauber slapped Parliament with his terrible illness, the Crypto AG report slaps Parliament again.

See TJ 19.30, of 11.11.20

It is not over, Me Christian BETTEX, who made the people discover the crime committed without right with the interventions of the Bar Presidents, has just given another slap to the Parliament.

Isabelle Moret

Isabelle MORET
Parliament President

is facing a big challenge :

"to put an end to the State in the State."

IN 2016, A DISSIDENT LAWYER WAS TALKING ABOUT INSIDERS WHO CONTROL POWER IN SWITZERLAND. TODAY, PARLIAMENTARIANS ARE TALKING ABOUT A STATE IN THE STATE.

Example 1: FIFA case

The terrible illness Michael LAUBER was suffering from, namely collective amnesia, showed that he had received too much power from Parliament. Only the insiders of Parliament knew that.

For others, the discovery of this terrible disease was a slap in the face. They understood the need for constant coaching and to supervise the services of the State so that they respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

Example 2: Crypto AG case

The Crypto AG report, in turn, showed that parliamentarians gave too much power to the spy service. Only the insiders knew.

It is a new slap in the face for parliamentarians who see that they must supervise and monitor the services of the State so that they respect the Values of the Constitution.

Example 3: Bar Presidents Case

It is not over, Me Christian BETTEX has recently revealed how professionals of the law can commit crime with impunity with the interventions of the Bar Presidents.

This is another slap in the face for parliamentarians who must supervise and monitor the activities of the Bar Presidents to ensure fundamental rights of the people are respected, including access to independent courts. This all the more since a magistrate and a public servant say that they want to impose the law of silence on the crime committed with the Interventions of the Bar Presidents :

See exhibit 201109DE_IG

This is another slap in the face for parliamentarians who must supervise and monitor the activities of the Bar Presidents to ensure fundamental rights of the people are respected, including access to independent courts

See TJ 19.30, of 11.11.20

201109DE_IG
04.11.20 A GENEVA MINISTER AND HIS STAFF ARE IN VERY SERIOUS DANGER

Geneva’s Council of State does not want to take responsibility for not having taken into consideration the conclusions of an expert who sounded the alarm

Unlike the authorities of other cantons, the Geneva State Council has external audits carried out to supervise the work of its magistrates.

It shall take account of the observations of the experts. He acts with emergency measures when he discovers that the human rights of the weakest are violated.

Pierre MAUDET

Pierre MAUDET
Counsellor of State
Geneva

Pierre Maudet, who suffered from selective amnesia, is protected by the Council of State for his safety and the one of his staff

He can no longer have contact with his staff for the safety of all.

See TJ 19h30 of 28 October 2020

 

GENEVA STATE COUNCIL SETS AN EXAMPLE BY TRUSTING THE OBSERVATIONS OF AN EXPERT WHO IS SOUNDING THE ALARM: WE ARE NO LONGER IN THE TIME OF GALILEO

DSince Michael LAUBER suffered from this terrible disease which is collective selective amnesia. Since we found out this disease is contagious. Since we know that the codes of procedure promote the development of this terrible disease, Geneva magistrates have grasp the nettle. They have experts who carried out audits on the work of the magistrates who have suffered from this disease. They take into account the observations of these experts.

See TJ 19h30 of 28 October 2020

At the time of Galileo, the magistrates were always right, even if the observations of independent experts proved the contrary.

If a lawman or a magistrate asserted that the Earth was motionless in the center of the Universe, the scientist who showed by observation that it was false, was falsely accused.

The magistrates harassed him until he admitted that the Earth was at the center of the world. Galileo, stigmatized by magistrates, had to admit that she was motionless in the center of the universe.

On leaving the trial, Galileo murmured the famous maxim :

«  and yet it moves  »

The Geneva State Council sets an example by listening to the observations of external experts.

He realized that the codes of procedure do not allow to fight against this terrible disease which is the selective amnesia of judicial magistrates.

It sets an example by having an audit done on the work of magistrates and making it transparent.

The most serious danger for Swiss democracy today is the collective amnesia of high-ranking magistrates who forget the existence of the relations between the Bar Association and the Courts.

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

This collective amnesia allows members of criminal organizations to commit crimes with impunity with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar.

This is no longer Galileo’s time.

To put an end to this terrible danger for the people, the Swiss Parliament has only to set up independent courts to judge the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar

See exhibit 201030DE_IG

TJ 19h30

051217DP_GC

201030DE_IG

28.10.20 ACTION = REACTION

The warning cry of Me Christian BETTEX on the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar was heard by the supervisory authority. See comments below dated 21.10.200

Hanspeter USTER

Hanspeter USTER
Chairman of the  
Supervisory Authority
Of MPC

(OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL)

 

MPC SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY REACTS

No one expected Michael LAUBER’s disease, which is collective selective amnesia, to be so contagious.

The supervisory authority wants to make transparency about these rules hidden from the people that allow the professionals of the law to commit crimes with impunity.

See exhibit 201022BC_DE

The crime committed by members of a criminal organization, with procedural codes that do not allow to take into account the interventions of the Bar Officers, is no longer a taboo.

Me Christian Bettex, devastated by his terrible disease, explained in detail how members of the lawyers' brotherhoods can commit crimes with impunity with the relationships that bind them to federal judges.

For each citizen to review the findings in Exhibit 201021DE_TB, after answering questions Q1 and Q2 on page 2 of Exhibit 201021DE_TB

On the basis of the observations of Me Christian BETTEX, the establishment of an independent Tribunal - able to judge the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar - was requirede

See exhibit 201023DE_IM

Me Christian BETTEX became the “BRADLEY BIRKENFELD” of the Order of Lawyers. He showed the importance that the Authorities make transparent at all levels these interventions of the Presidents of the Bar to eradicate this terrible disease which is collective amnesia.

See exhibit 201028DE_IG

201022BC_DE

201023DE_IM

21.10.20 OUTRAGE !

Stéphane HESSEL’s message is 10 years old.

See TJ, 19:30 of 21 Oct 2020

The prodigal lawyer of the Vaudois Parliament, Me Christian BETTEX, shows that this message is more true than ever for the crimes committed by members of the Order of Lawyers with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar

See exhibit 201020MailGC

Christian BETTEX
Me Christian BETTEX
The prodigal lawyer
of the Vaudois Parliament

FEAR MUST CHANGE SIDES !

Me Christian BETTEX, devastated by the terrible disease of Michael LAUBER, launches the alert in the Vaudois Parliament for fear to change sides!

In France teachers no longer dare to speak freely about Islamism for fear of being beheaded. In Switzerland, it is the federal judges and Prosecutors who no longer dare to investigate the crimes committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar for fear of being "beheaded" during their elections.

France reacted with the highest authorities of the country who take measures with the slogan :

FEAR MUST CHANGE SIDES

See TJ, 19.30 of 19 Oct.2020

The former President of the Bar Christian BETTEX, devastated by the disease of Michael LAUBER, decided to show the Swiss authorities that the crime committed by members of the Bar Association, with the interventions of the Bar Association, is due to the fact that the Presidents of the Bar have received too much power from the Authorities. They’re above the Judges !

With a masterful demonstration, due to his terrible disease which is collective selective amnesia, he urges the indignants of the people to ask the Authorities to reduce the power of the Presidents of the Bar with a simple corrective measure :

"to set up independent Courts, with the task of judging crimes committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar"

See exhibit 201020DE_GC

Parliament has the solution given by a former President of the Bar Association so that : FEAR changes of SIDES

What is Parliament going to do ? Case to be followed

201020MailGC
14.10.20 PROTECTING THE HUMAN RIGHTS OF YOUNG PEOPLE OR BEING ELECTED AS A FEDERAL JUDGE WITHOUT BEING ABLE TO RESPECT THE FUTURE OF YOUNG PEOPLE

A magnificent message given by Christian Lüscher to the federal judges to be elected by him.

Christian Luescher

Christian LUSCHER
National Councillor

IT’S HARD FOR CHRISTIAN LUSCHER TO HEAR YOUNG PEOPLE SHOWING THAT PARLIAMENTARIANS CAN NO LONGER ENFORCE HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER THE CURRENT JUDICIAL SYSTEMS

 

He shows by attacking the Greens that as long as parliamentarians elect their judges, there will be no separation of powers, and only federal judges who do not want to respect the human rights of youth will be elected by preference

He reminds that judges do not have the task of verifying that the human rights guaranteed by the Constitution are respected.

Their role is limited to enforcing laws even if they do not respect constitutionally guaranteed rights.

See TJ 19h30 of Wednesday 14 October

To launch an initiative so that the people can control the work of Parliament by electing federal judges, what a magnificent message given by Christian Luscher to the Youth.

Finally, a solution proposed to ensure the respect of the Constitution by an independent oversight body elected by the people

 
07.10.20 BLACK FRIDAY FOR THE VAUDOIS STATE COUNCIL DEPRIVED OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Public Prosecutor of the Canton of Vaud announces through his spokesperson the Prosecutor François Danthe that he no longer wants to work for the people..

Nuria Gorrite

Nuria GORRITE
State Council President
Vaud State

must appeal to the Office of the General Prosecutor of the Confederation to fight organized crime

See exhibit 201002DE_GC

THE NEW INVENTED PROCEDURE BY THE COTTIER PROSECUTOR SO THAT THE COMPLAIGNANT DOES NOT RECEIVE HIS COURT ORDERS IS MAKING A HIT AT THE PUBLIC PROSEUTOR’S OFFICE

Procedure description reminder :

200616DE_PC

Eric COTTIER’s idea of genius, to send his court orders by mail A so that they do not arrive, creates an incredible spirit of competition at the Vaudois Public Ministry.

The weakness of this method is that we cannot know whether the court order never existed or was not sent.

The Prosecutor François Danthe has just improved the procedure, he simply announces that the Public Prosecutor no longer deals with the complaints concerning the crime committed with the practices that are chilling, described in the request for parliamentary investigation.

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

See exhibit 201002DE_GC

To that end, He presents a whole arsenal of practices that make people shudder and use them to deny justice. See Note 1 to Note 23 in the following document : 200914FD_DA

He brilliantly shows that his new complaint handling technique is a huge step forward for the perpetrators of the crimes committed with the interventions of the Bar Presidents who will no longer be disturbed by the Public Prosecutor’s Office.

The only minor disadvantage is that the taxes of the vaudois are used to finance organized crime instead of fundamental rights

See exhibit 201002DE_GC

201002DE_GC

200914FD_DA

051217DP_GC

30.09.20 CLIMATE EMERGENCY: PROSECUTOR ERIC COTTIER GIVES THE SOLUTION TO THE RESISTANCE SO THAT A LEGAL SOLUTION CAN BE FOUND BEFORE THE GREEK CALENDS

This prestigious Prosecutor comes to the aid of young people by offering them a legal solution with the guarantee that the deadline of the Calendes Grecques will not be exceeded.

See TJof 19:30 , of Thursday, September 30, 2020.

Procureur Eric COTTIER

General Prosecutor
Eric COTTIER

The brilliant inventor of the procedure that could put an end to the Climate Emergency

ANOTHER SOLUTION PROPOSED BY THE EXAMPLE BY THIS INVENTIVE GENERAL PROSECUTOR TO YOUNG RESISTANTS TO FIND A SOLUTION TO THE CLIMATE EMERGENCY IN ABOUT 5 LONG YEARS:

« DO THE JOB OF GENERAL PROSECUTOR »

 

The Prosecutor Eric COTTIER showed, by example, to young people who waste a lot of time to demonstrate, that it would be enough for them to do the job of General Prosecutor to legalize the occupation of the premises of a bank.

He explained that he himself, in order to allow the wealthiest to circumvent the Constitution legally, has developed a procedure that released them for sure

It is quite simple: He puts on record that the complainants received a negative decision by mail A and that they did not applied within the time limits.

In practice, the complainants never received his decisions because the court order did not exist or was not sent. With this new cunning procedure the criminals are automatically released.

By becoming General Prosecutor, the young resistance will be able to legalize the occupations of banks etc., with the power they will have!

Here is an example :

Procedure description 200616DE_PC

Application of the procedure in the field:

See point 4 of the document 200930DE_VS

 
23.09.20 THE OPERATION OF SEPARATING THE POWER OF FEDERAL JUDGES FROM THAT OF POLITICIANS HAS FAILED

The election of federal judges has not been postponed.

The people end up with a team of federal judges who cannot enforce the values of the Constitution.

Yves Donzallaz
Yves DONZALLAZ
Federal Judge

Federal Judge Yves Donzallaz has shown that the system of electing federal judges does not allow the people to have an independent Federal Court that respects the Values of the Constitution.

See rts info du 10 sept.

 

 

THE SWISS PEOPLE STILL DO NOT HAVE A NEUTRAL AND INDEPENDENT FEDERAL COURT. YOUTH WILL CONTINUE TO USE CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE TO COMPENSATE FOR THE LACK OF INDEPENDENCE OF FEDERAL JUDGES IN UPHOLDING THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION

The terrible disease of Michael LAUBER, which is collective amnesia, which was not detected before his election, shows the weakness of the system of electing judges.

Parliamentarians have become aware of this

See article le matin du 23 septembre.

Federal judges do not pass any medical examination to verify that they do not suffer from collective amnesia and that they are not under the control of malicious members of a criminal organization.

Just this week two judges of the Criminal Court of Bellinzona were diagnosed as very sick with a progressive version of Michael LAUBER’s disease.

Like Michael LAUBER, they have terrible gaps of memory to the point of forgetting that they are paid with public funds to defend the rights of the litigants and to enforce the Values of the Constitution.

A complaint has been lodged so that the State can quarantine them and prevent them from discrediting the entire judiciary with this terrible disease that seems to be linked to the interventions of the bar Presidents.

See exhibit : 200920DE_MP

It’s a really worrisome disease like the coronavirus: when these federal judges discover that prosecutors like Jacques Rayroud, Eric Cottier, Michael Lauber violated the procedural guarantees, they are so disoriented and amnesiac that it is the victims who are billed for the faults of the Prosecutors. This form of amnesia is reminiscent of prion-induced dementia. With such a lack of discernment, magistrates can be under the influence of malicious people.

The civic disobedience of young people in this context to save the climate is the only reasonable solution as long as the Federal Judges are contaminated by the terrible disease of Michael LAUBER which could be due to a prion.

le matin

200920DE_MP

16.09.20 PROSECUTOR FRANCOIS DANTHE COMES TO THE AID OF PROSECUTOR JACQUES RAYROUD WITH THE LAUBER METHOD

It is not a collective amnesia, but the collective denial by all the fans of the prestigious school of the judiciary of Michael LAUBER

See exhibit 200914DE_GC

Jacques RAYROUD

Jacques Rayroud

Deputy Prosecutor of Michael LAUBER after having acquired his letters of nobility with the case Paul Grossrieder

 

 

A NEW NON-INVASIVE TEST IS PUT IN PLACE TO DETECT PRODIGAL MAGISTRATES FROM THE PRESTIGIOUS LAUBER SCHOOL WHO GIVE BENEFITS TO MEMBERS OF CRIMINAL ORGANIZATIONS WITH COLLECTIVE DENIAL

This is a simple question like the one asked to people who may be contaminated with Covid-19,

Here is the test :

1. Read the document below

051217DP_GC

2.Locate the intervention of the Bâtonnier Richard

3. Indicate the Code of Procedure where it states that an authorization from the Bâtonnier Richard is required to file a criminal complaint against a corporate lawyer who violates copyright

Your answer :

(A) This intervention by the Bâtonnier does not exist in any code of procedure, the codes of procedure do not allow to treat this intervention, the judge must recuse himself because the Tribunal is not independentt

(B) This intervention of the Bâtonnier does not exist in any code of procedure, the judge has the right to make a denial of justice, because it is a privilege granted to members of the Order of Lawyers by members of the school LAUBER

Test results :

The magistrate who answered (B) is a fan of the prestigious Michael LAUBER School of Magistrates. He is positive on the test

Three magistrates have just been detected positive to the Test. Parliament will have to confine them. See exhibit:

200915DE_MP

 

051217DP_GC

200914DE_GC

200915DE_MP

09.09.20 THE PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL OF STATE, WITNESS TO THE PRACTICE OF PROSECUTOR WHO MAKES HIM SHUDDER, MUST TESTIFY

See exhibit 200909DE_AD

Anne-Claude Demierre
Anne-Claude Demierre
Council of Fribourg State

She will simply have to testify to the existence of procedures that give the creeps to the citizens of a rule of law

PUBLIC MINISTRIES HAVE THEIR FUTURE ASSURED BY THE YOUNG PRODIGIES WHO CAME OUT OF MICHAEL LAUBER’S SCHOOL OF PROSECUTORS.  AMONG THEM, IS THE YOUNG PROSECUTOR FROM FRIBOURG, JEAN-LUC MOOSER, WHO USES PRACTICES THAT MAKE PEOPLE SHUDDER EVEN MICHAEL LAUBER DID NOT THINK TO USE THEM

After Jacques RAYROUD, who paid tribute to Michael LAUBER by using methods that are not imaginable in a State of Law, the succession is assured for the MPC.

It is incredible, even the Department of Justice and Police does not dare to act against these young Prosecutors, who grew up with the methods of Michael LAUBER.

 

SILENCE IS NO LONGER AN OPTION

Even though Michael LAUBER’s methods are mesmerizing and have proven their worth in granting statute of limitations to members of criminal organizations, they have only one flaw: it discredits the entire judicial system.

Anne-Claude DEMIERRE, witness of the practice of Prosecutor who makes you shudder, will be the first President of the Council of State to recall that a Prosecutor is paid to enforce the Values of the Constitution

200909DE_AD
02.09.20 AFTER MICHAEL LAUBER’S EXPLANATIONS, FEDERAL JUDGES REVEAL A NEW PROCEDURE USED TO VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION

There is worse than the collective amnesia of Michael LAUBER. It is federal judges who report the wrongdoings of Prosecutors and charge them to victims by indicating that there is no remedies available

See exhibit 200819TP_DE

Simonetta Sommaruga

Simonetta SOMMAGURA
Federal President

In addition, federal judges did not say everything :

Voir pièce 200822DE_TP

The LAUBER method had to run at full capacity

WHAT IS THE FEDERAL COUNCIL GOING TO DO WITH ITS PRESIDENT, SIMONETTA SOMMARUGA, TO PUT AN END TO THESE PRACTICES THAT MAKE PEOPLE SHUDDER AND SERVE THE INTERESTS OF A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION AGAINST OUR PEOPLE

While in 2016 silence was an option, today it is no longer with the use of these procedures, revealed by the professionals of the law, which do not appear in any code of procedure.

See exhibit 200901DE_SS

Thanks to Michael LAUBER for introducing us to the procedure of collective amnesia

Thanks to Eric COTTIER for having made us discover the procedure which makes that the litigant does not receive his orders or he receives them after the time limit of appeal is passed

Thank you to the Federal Judges of the Criminal Court for having revealed the procedure that allows them to invoice the faults of prosecutors to the victims, with an argument to tetanise of fear the litigants who address the Criminal Court!

See exhibit 200819TP_DE

In 2016, Simonetta Sommaruga knew that the dissident lawyer considered it pointless to file a criminal complaint. The people had to render justice themselves.

In 2020, the Silence is no longer an Option, if the highest magistrates of the country do not hesitate to reveal their practices that make tremble to violate the Constitution, we can try to file a criminal complaint

See exhibit 200827DE_MP

What is the Federal Council going to do to put an end to these practices that make you shudder?

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

See exhibit 200901DE_SS

051217DP_GC

200901DE_SS

26.08.20 MICHAEL LAUBER USED THE DEFICIENCIES IN UBS’S CONTROL PROCEDURES, WHICH DO NOT VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTION, TO FUND ORGANIZED CRIME COMMITTED BY LAW PROFESSIONALS WITH CLIENT ACCOUNTS

Sergio ERMOTTI was briefed on the request for a parliamentary investigation on crime committed with the interventions of the bar Presidents.

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

He knows that Michael LAUBER violates the fundamental rights of small UBS clients, with procedures that violate the Swiss Constitution.

CEO UBS
Sergio ERMOTTI
CEO UBS

His latest challenge is to show that UBS customers can trust him..

 

See exhibit 200826DE_SE

AFTER THE BRADLEY BIRKENFELD CASE, SERGIO ERMOTTI, CEO OF UBS, HAS THE CHALLENGE OF SHOWING THAT UBS IS WORTHY OF THE TRUST OF ITS SMALL CLIENTS FOR FACING ECONOMIC CRIME COMMITTED WITH THE LINKS BETWEEN THE BAR PRESIDENTS AND THE COURTS.
IN PARTICULAR, HE MUST SHOW THAT UBS HAS CONTROL PROCEDURES WHICH ENABLE IT TO REJECT THE CLAIM FOR PAYMENT OF RECEIVABLES OBTAINED WITH PROCEDURAL CODES THAT ARE NOT APPLICABLE.

Sergio ERMOTTI knows the request for a parliamentary inquiry.

He was made aware that the “NOTICES OF SEIZURE OF A DEBT ISSUED BY THE PROSECUTION OFFICE” may be the result of a scam developed by Michael LAUBER with his collective amnesias and the public hidden relations that bind the Bar Association to the Courts..

He even has the evidence that Me Christian BETTEX and Me François de ROUGEMONT confirmed that the Courts were not independent and that NOTICES OF SEIZURE OF A CLAIM had been established with procedural codes which were not applicable..

He knows there’s a criminal complaint against a criminal organization. He knows that there have already been irregularities in the establishment of the forum to deal with this criminal complaint against criminal organization.

See exhibit : 200822DE_TP

As CEO, he must ensure that UBS has set up control procedures that its employees do not violate the Constitution when they receive NOTIFICATION OF SEIZURE OF A DEBT established with practices that thrill by courts that are not independent.

He is familiar with these practices, which are similar to those described by Bradley Birkenfeld and even more dishonest.

He is given notice to act so that UBS does not violate the Constitution with its procedures, knowing that the political world knows the terrible disease of Michael LAUBER which is collective amnesia.

He knows that today the Silence on Organized Crime with the Complicity of the Banks is no longer an option for the Swiss people.

No one can ignore the explanations of Me BETTEX, lawyer of the Vaudois Parliament, who explains how the Judges and the Prosecutors violate the Constitution with the interventions of the Bar Presidents.

Read on page 3, Exhibit   : 200822DE_TP : The Hidden Public Rule on Bar President Operations!

200826DE_SE

051217DP_GC

200822DE_TP

19.08.20 MAIL WITH A SUSPICIOUS RED BARCODE TURNS OUT TO BE A FORMIDABLE WEAPON USED BY PROSECUTORS TO COVER UP ORGANIZED CRIME

The Prosecutor General Fabien GASSER was asked to address the question of the crime committed with the interventions of the Bar Presidents at the conference of the Swiss Prosecutors.

See exhibit 181002DE_ML

Fabien GASSER
Fabien Gasser
Fribourg General Prosecutor

Neither Fabien GASSER, nor Jacques RAYROUD, nor Michael LAUBER have taken steps to prevent this crime. On the contrary, Eric Cottier revealed some of the procedures used by the Public Ministries to cover up organized crime by sending A letters

In turn, it is the Justice Department of Fribourg that explains how Eric COTTIER was able to make his letters A, which are orders with appeal, arrive too late

AFTER PROSECUTOR ERIC COTTIER EXPLAINED THE CHILLING PRACTICES HE USES TO PREVENT HIS ORDERS FROM REACHING A DEFENDANT, DR. ERNI WONDERS ABOUT THE FUNCTIONING OF THE POST OFFICE, WHICH MAKES, THAT HE RECEIVED A LETTER DATED JULY 21 FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IN FRIBOURG ONLY ON AUGUST 5

Each one receives state administrations letters where there is no longer a postal stamp on the envelope, but a red barcode. This is the new generation of A mail. How is it that the post office waits 14 days to distribute an A mail with a red barcode, when it comes from the Justice Department of Fribourg? That was the question Dr. ERNI asked the prosecution officer.

See exhibit 200809DE_OP

The prosecution officer of the Justice Department tells him that it is normal, that he received it only on August 5, because before there were court recess. Note that this letter A is indeed dated July 21. If it is invoked in court, it will be this date that will refer, not August 5..

The prosecution officer showed that with digital technologies, it is easy for Eric COTTIER to send a letter A, that the litigant receives only after the time limits for appeal have expired..

If the Public Prosecutor programs the Greek Calends with his red barcode, the defendant will never receive his order. This is the case for the order that the General Staff of ERIC COTTIER allegedly sent for not having to investigate the fraud committed by the Order of Lawyers with the interventions of the bar President and the coercion exerted on the lawyers of Dr Erni.

After the collective amnesias of the General Prosecutor of the Confederation, on sessions without protocols, there are the red barcode of the justice services that allow to deceive the readers of a mail on its date of receipt by the recipient.

Why not use digital technologies to track Prosecutors and their couriers, such as tracking COVID carriers. Why not monitor with image recognition, as China knows how to do, the country’s top judges who have not understood that engineers are not there to help them violate the rights of citizens.

…. collective amnesia, letters A that do not arrive, the interventions of the bar Presidents show that the Initiates exist and that silence is no longer an option…

 

 
12.08.20 COLLECTIVE AMNESIA DISEASE IS NO LONGER AN OPTION

Prosecutor Eric Cottier, contaminated by the collective amnesia virus, will not be able to justify his silence on the crime committed with the interventions of the bar Presidents by invoking this terrible disease to which succumb of the Prosecutors.

Procureur Eric Cottier

General Prosecutor
Eric COTTIER
infected with the virus
of collective amnesia

PROSECUTOR ERIC COTTIER MAY HAVE BEEN INFECTED WITH THE COLLECTIVE AMNESIA VIRUS AT THE SWISS PROSECUTORS' CONFERENCE CHAIRED BY FABIEN GASSER

In 2016, Fabien Gasser was President of the Conference of Prosecutors and Michael LAUBER Vice-Presidentt.

He was asked to deal with the case of crime committed with the interventions of the bar Presidents described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry.

.

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

Michael LAUBER was informed

See exhibit 181002DE_ML

At that time, a dissident lawyer said that words were no longer useful. Prosecutors of the MPC wanted to impose the law of silence to this lawyer.

This year, the Administrative Court followed the slogan of young people who say that “SILENCE IS NO LONGER AN OPTION” by saying that “MICHAEL LAUBER’S COLLECTIVE AMNESIA IS NOT AN OPTION”

The first consequence is that the Prosecutor Eric COTTIER will not be able to invoke collective amnesia to explain his new procedure invented for not investigating the criminal complaint against the Deputy Prosecutor of Michael LAUBER .

The Prosecutor François DANTHE now speaks of denial of justice, but the exact name would be the «collective denial of justice», because several Prosecutors have been contaminated by this virus, including the Prosecutor FABIEN GASSER

See exhibit 200728MP_DE

Politicians want to cancel the office of General Prosecutor. They are not all wrong. This would prevent the gathering of the Conference of Prosecutors and the spread of the Collective Amnesia Virus.

 
05.08.20 PARLIAMENTARIANS, PROFESSIONALS OF THE LAW, HAVE UNDERSTOOD THAT CRIME COMMITTED BY GENERAL PROSECUTOR IS NO LONGER AN OPTION FOR THE PEOPLE

Andrea Caroni

Me Andrea Caroni
President Judicial Commission

He is the first President of the Judicial Commission to demand the dismissal of the General Prosecutor of the Confederation for having violated his Oath to respect the Constitution

See TJ of 24 July 2020

IN 2016, A DISSIDENT LAWYER RAISED THE ALARM ABOUT THE DYSFUNCTION OF PUBLIC MINISTRIES SAYING THAT WORDS WERE USELESS, AND THAT THE NEED TO ORGANIZE A STRIKE AGAINST A FEDERAL COUNCILLOR WAS HIS RECOMMENDATION FOR STOPPING THE DYSFUNCTION OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM.

General Prosecutors Michael LAUBER and Jacques RAYROUD have agreed with the dissident lawyer by the way they handled the FIFA case, and the request for a parliamentary inquiry into the economic crimes committed by Me Patrick Foetisch with the interventions of the bar Presidents.

To rediscover these thrilling methods, described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry, which violate the rights guaranteed by the Constitution and which are no longer an option:

see exhibit : 051217DP_GC

 

The appointment of Special Prosecutor Stephan KELLER may break the law of silence:

See TJ 19h30 of 30 July 2020

 

The reaction of parliamentarians who want to reform the functioning of the Public Ministries is an awareness that the violation of the rules of good faith by General Prosecutors is no longer an option :

See TJ 19h30 of 26 July 2020

 

 
29.07.20 REQUEST FOR AN INTERVIEW WITH THE PRESIDENT OF THE STATE COUNCIL OF FRIBOURG TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE OF STATE FRAUD COMMITTED BY PROSECUTORS

Anne-Claude Demierre is familiar with the interventions of the Presidents of the bar described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry. She knows that in year 2017, Dr Erni get an interview with the President of the Parliament, Mr. Bruno Boschung. This interview allowed Mr Bruno Boschung  to understand immediately why the interventions of the Presidents of the bar violated the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

She knows that the President of the Parliament has never been able to clarify the reasons allowing to justify the fraud committed with these interventions of the bar Presidents. She knows that it is the Omerta exercised by the General prosecutors that allows criminals to escape justice.

It is his turn to address this open issue.

Anne-Claude DEMIERRE
Anne-Claude Demierre
Council of State Fribourg
President

To reread the request for a parliamentary inquiry :

051217DP_GC

INTERVENTIONS OF BAR PRESIDENTS WHICH ALLOW PROSECUTORS TO VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION,  SECRET SESSIONS WITHOUT PROTOCOLS BY MICHAEL LAUBER TO GIVE BENEFITS TO ONE PARTY, ARE NO LONGER AN OPTION!
INFANTINO-LAUBER CASE IS THE LAST STRAW THAT HAS BROKEN THE CAMEL’S BACK

In 2017, the legislator claimed that the people could trust the highest Prosecutors of justice such as, Michael LAUBER, Jacques RAYROUD, Eric COTTIER, etc. According to him, they were above all suspicion.

Today, Silence is no longer an option. The Presidents of the Councils of Swiss States know that the people can no longer trust these Prosecutors.

They know that these prosecutors were aware of the request for a parliamentary inquiry. The latter testified to the existence of practices, which make us shudder, applied by the high magistrates of the Courts to give advantages to members of brotherhoods of lawyers.

They know that an interview on this request for a parliamentary inquiry, made by an elite of witnesses, allows them to see the panoply of practices that make organized crime shudder. The interventions of the bar Presidents or the hearings without protocols of the Prosecutor LAUBER are only the tip of the iceberg

Anne-Claude DEMIERRE, in particular, after the WEINSTEIN case, knows that Silence is no longer an option. She is in the right place to protect the rights of the victims of those violators of the Constitution who have too much power.

Like all Swiss citizens, Anne-Claude DEMIERRE knows that the people cannot admit that a General Prosecutor like Michael LAUBER, or the Prosecutors of the Canton of Fribourg, can allow a P. Foetisch to obtain the prescription with the interventions of the Presidents of the bar.

She knows that the INFANTINO–LAUBER case no longer allows us to observe silence on the practices that make us shudder, cited in the request for a parliamentary inquiry. She knows that the former President of the Grand Council, Mr. Bruno Boschung, is a key witness!!

She knows that this is a real state scam committed by these prosecutors who knew the request for parliamentary investigation. Above all, she knows that she has the means to act, just as women have found the means to act against a Harvey Weinstein who had too much power! !

See you on August 19!

200727DE_CE

051217DP_GC

200727DE_CE

22.07.20 ME CHRISTIAN BETTEX SHOWS THAT THE ABSENCE OF A REGISTER OF THE LAWYERS' PRIVATE ADDRESSES ALLOWS THEM TO HINDER INTERRUPTION OF PRESCRIPTION

The Office of Prosecutions states that it is not possible to interrupt the prescription against a lawyer who has made a mistake at the address of his study.

See : 200710OP_DE

Me Christian Bettex demonstrates that a lawyer can refuse to disclose his private address, which forces his client to go through an abusive and costly procedure in order to interrupt the prescription. The  General Prosecutor of the Canton of BERN has been made aware of  this discrimination of citizens

See exhibit: 200720DE_MP

Me Christian BETTEX

Address to interrupt the prescription :
Me Christian BETTEX
SELANÈCHE 17, 1009 Pully

WHO KNOWS THIS PRIVATE ADDRESS: “ME CHRISTIAN BETTEX, SENALÈCHE 17, 1009 PULLY”, WHO SHOULD APPEAR IN A REGISTER OF LAWYERS' PRIVATE ADDRESSES FOR THE PERSON WHO WANTS TO INTERRUPT THE PRESCRIPTION AGAINST ME CHRISTIAN BETTEX

For all those who do not know this private address, you will be told that it is necessary to check all the controls of the inhabitants of the Municipalities of Switzerland, until a Municipality informs you that Me Christian BETTEX is domiciled in their Municipality. Several Municipalities charge the request for information: 20 francs.

If you need to contact 100 municipalities before finding the municipality where Me Christian BETTEX is domiciled, it could cost you 2,000 CHF, plus working hours, or 4,000 CHF if we consider that the applicant can also charge 20 CHF by request.

While waiting for the legislator to put an end to this privilege of lawyers, it is recommended that all citizens make on social networks a register of the lawyers' private addresses, where each communicates the private addresses of the lawyers he knows.

It will be :

THE FREE PUBLIC REGISTER OF LAWYERS' PRIVATE ADDRESSES

The first address in this register is :

Me Christian BETTEX, SENALÈCHE 17, 1009 PULLY

Suggestion :

When a lawyer refuses to give his private address, one could plan to make a flashmob at his private home, broadcast on youtube, to show that this lawyer discriminates against his clients!

 

Thank you to Me Christian BETTEX, this former President of the bar for showing how the absence of this register of private addresses of lawyers allows the professionals of the law to discriminate citizens!!

200710OP_DE

200720DE_MP

15.07.20 SILENCE ON THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS BY PROSECUTORS IS NO LONGER AN OPTION, AS PROSECUTOR ALEXANDER ACOSTA CAN SHOW IT TO PROSECUTOR ERIC COTTIER

The violation of human rights by the Prosecutors can no longer protect the Men who have too much power like Harvey WEINSTEIN, Jeffrey EPSTEIN, etc.

Alexander ACOSTA
Alexander ACOSTA
Former Prosecutor of Florida State
TRUMP Secretary for Labour



SILENCE IS NO LONGER AN OPTION FOR PROSECUTORS WHO WANT TO GRANT IMMUNITY TO MEN OF POWER BY VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS. THE LAWYER OF THE "CAP PROTECTION JURIDIQUE" FOUND THAT THE PROSECUTOR ERIC COTTIER HAD INVENTED PROCEDURES THAT DID NOT EXIST SO THAT HIS ORDERS DID NOT ARRIVE AT THEIR DESTINATION! 

The #Metoo movement has shown that the victims of Power Men no longer accept SILENCE on the protections granted to Power Men by Prosecutors

See 200715_MPT

Like the Prosecutor Alexander ACOSTA who protected the couple Jeffrey EPSTEIN, the Prosecutor Eric COTTIER found the means by his actions to protect the Men of Power, members of brotherhoods of lawyers, with a procedure hidden from the public.

Former Prosecutor Alexander ACOSTA can testify that the #Metoo movement no longer allows a Prosecutor to grant secret protections to POWER Men by violating victims' fundamental rights.

See TJ of 19:30 of 14 July, EPSTEIN CASE

See also the article of Francis Pryer in the diplomatic world of October 2019 on page 10

Article by F. Pryer

In Switzerland, the General Prosecutor, Eric COTTIER, makes even stronger by inventing procedures that do not exist to grant protections to Presidents of the bar and the Man of Power, who is Foetisch, whose criminal offences he knows.

The Vaud Parliament, which elected this Prosecutor, must now examine the respect of human rights in the Vaud State, which no longer exists with the actions of Prosecutor Eric COTTIER.

See exhibit : 200715DE_GC

200715DE_GC

200715_MPT

08.07.20 VIOLATION OF PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES BY THE COUNTRY’S HIGHEST MAGISRATS, THIS CONTINUES

After Pierre MAUDET, Michael LAUBER, it is Eric COTTIER’s turn to violate the procedural guarantees

He does it for the happiness of criminals and the misfortune of litigants!

Vaud State
General Prosecutor
ERIC COTTIER

With an astounding front, Eric COTTIER, made a litigant believe that, according to the code of procedure, the latter had the burden of proof that an court order, which he did not receive, had been sent to him.

See point below dated 15.04.20

 

A LAWYER OF THE "CAP PROTECTION JURIDIQUE" NOTES THAT THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR OF THE VAUD STATE, ERIC COTTIER, USES AND JUSTIFIES THE EXISTENCE OF A PROCEDURE THAT DOES NOT EXIST TO EXPLAIN THAT LITIGANTS DO NOT RECEIVE HIS COURT ORDERS

Why is it that the highest magistrates of the country - who must ensure the respect of the Constitution - allow themselves to lie and violate the procedural guarantees, …., even with arrogance!

Pierre MAUDET gives a first answer by refusing to resign :

Pierre Maudet shows that the legislator has so strongly protected the high magistrates, that if the high magistrates lie and do not resign, they put the institutions in crisis! 

See TJ 19h30 of Tuesday 6 July, interview with Laurent Dufour

Michael LAUBER made the same demonstration by applying again as General Prosecutor, when he had lied

Michael LAUBER shows that if the lie has become a normality for a high magistrate, it destabilizes the institutions

ERIC COTTIER vient de rejoindre ces hauts magistrats qui trompent le peuple avec un mensonge. Cette violation des garanties de procédures a été constatée par une juriste de la CAP PROTECTION JURIDIQUE

Eric COTTIER could destabilize our institutions with his incredible lie, which is incomprehensible and unpredictable from the part of the highest magistrate of the Vaud State, who has the duty to fight against organized crime

 

To be continued !

 

 
01.07.20 BOOMERANG EFFECT FOR THE PRESIDENT OF THE STATE COUNCIL OF FRIBOURG

Delegating is a quality, on the condition to ensure that the result is achieved.

Anne-Claude Demierre has the quality of knowing how to delegate, but she did not know the rules taught in management schools to manage organized crime.

When the result is not achieved, it is these rules, which specify the responsibility of the President of the State, that apply and allow to respect the Constitution


Anne-Claude Demierre
President of the State Council of Fribourg

ME MAURICE ROPRAZ TOOK TOO LONG TO PROCESS THE LETTER OF 29 JANUARY 2020, THE PRESIDENT MUST TAKE BACK THE WHEEL

The President of the Council of State had delegated to Me Maurice ROPRAZ, the processing of the violation of fundamental rights, caused with the interventions of the bar Presidents, described in the request for parliamentary investigation.

051217DP_GC

Me Maurice ROPAZ acted too late. The damage worsened without the fundamental rights were restored.

Certainly, he confirmed that the people could not know that Foetisch had told the Truth when he said that his offences would never be investigated.

Of course, he confirmed that the people cannot know the interventions of the bar Presidents that allow members of a criminal organization to use the State Power to commit crimes with full impunity.

However, he did not manage in 5 months to restore the fundamental rights of citizens.

It is the management rules taught to fight against criminal organizations that must now apply.

See exhibit 200701DE_AD

The President of the Council of State, who has the responsibility of the result, must take back the wheel.

She has proof that the codes of procedure do not allow to take into account the interventions of bar Presidents to put an end to the activities of this criminal organization infiltrated in the State.

200701DE_AD

051217DP_GC

24.06.20 SILENCE ON THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE INTERVENTIONS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE BAR IS NO LONGER AN OPTION

The State Councillor, Me Maurice ROPRAZ, lawyer by profession, gives instructions to enforce fundamental rights.

Me Maurice ROPRAZ

Me Maurice ROPRAZ
Councillor of STATE Fribourg

He is the Great Specialist of the illicit damages created with the interventions of the Presidents of the bar.

 

His magic formula to repair the damage caused by the interventions of the Presidents of the bar, as well as to obtain the respect of fundamental rights, is :

"the filing of a complaint LP17"

ME MAURICE ROPRAZ ADDRESS THE INTERVENTIONS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE BAR, WHICH VIOLATE THE RESPECT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND THE ACCESS TO NEUTRAL AND INDEPENDENT COURTS.

His instructions, to file a complaint LP17 in the aim to access to neutral and independent Courts and to repair the damage, are followed under his direction as coach and mentor

Phase 1 :
The complaint LP17 was filed with the mention that: "it is Me Maurice ROPRAZ who wants to show that this means makes it possible to enforce fundamental rights in the case described by the request for parliamentary investigation"

See exhibit: 200603DE_TC

Phase 2:
The President of the Court Christine OVERNAY asked for clarification on the instructions given by Maurice ROPRAZ to ensure the respect of fundamental rights

See exhibit: 200608CO_DE

Phase 3:
Ms Christine OVERNAY is put in contact with the coach, State Councillor, to apply the complaint LP17. The latter can thus answer the questions she would have on the way in which the LP17 complaint can ensure access to neutral and independent Courts and repair the damage

See exhibit:200624DE_CO

Phase 4:
It remains only to Me Maurice ROPRAZ to show that his procedure works when Patrick Foetisch obtains the penal prescription simply by not responding to the summons of the President of the bar.

See exhibit: 070329PB_TC

This request for permission to obtain from the President of the bar to file a criminal complaint is a procedure hidden from the public that violates fundamental rights as well as access to neutral and independent Courts.

This is an example of the interventions of the President of the bar who create damage by allowing criminals, with a title of lawyer, to escape justice

051217DP_GC

070329PB_TC

200603DE_TC

200608CO_DE

200624DE_CO

17.06.20 VIOLATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE CONSTITUTION BY THE AUTHORITIES

The new generation of demonstrators makes the following statement very clear for the authorities:

Le silence n'est plus une option

Demonstration in Geneva on 10 th June for the respect of human rights guaranteed by the Constitutions

The Silence of the Authorities violated the fundamental rights of Georg FLOYD, it killed him, it is no longer an option

 

SILENCE IS NO LONGER AN OPTION. FOR THE FIRST TIME AN ASSOCIATION IS BEING FORMED TO RESTORE POWER TO THE PEOPLE. IT IS CALLED "THE FRIENDS OF THE CONSTITUTION". IT USES THE PRINCIPLE THAT  :

Wenn das Volk führt, werden die Führer folgen.

See exhibit 200616_FDV

The association «THE FRIENDS OF THE CONSTITUTION» could become the first independent supervisory organization of the respect of the Constitution by the Authorities, that allows citizens to put an end to the actions of elected officials who abuse their power.

The request for a discharge from Bertrand TSCHANZ to break the silence of the violation of fundamental rights, by those who must render justice, could become a standard procedure.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. For example, who knows that when you sign a deposition report, the state can refuse you a copy??

See exhibit  200610DE_CE

Who drafted such procedures that clearly violate the fundamental rights of citizens?

200616_FDV

200610DE_CE

10.06.20 ACCOUNTABILITY OF THE HIGH AUTHORITIES THROUGH A DEMAND FOR DISCHARGE TO ENSURE TRANSPARENCY ON THE ACTIONS OF A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION HIGHLIGHTED BY A RECORDING

The Prosecuting Officer, Bertrand Tschanz, has proof that he has received fraudulently established Securities with codes of procedure which are not applicable.

200430DE_OP

He is aware of the existence of a record that shows that these fraudulently established Securities are linked to a horrible blackmail done on a CEO. He knows that the General Prosecutor of the Confederation and members of the Fribourg judicial order are concerned.

200506DE_OP

He knows that he has the power to act so as not to violate fundamental rights. He knows that a dissident lawyer has launched an offensive against those who violate fundamental rights, based on this and other recordings. He knows that he is putting himself in danger if he violates fundamental rights rather than respecting article 35 of the Constitution.

200327DE_IG

He knows that the President of the Council of State is aware of the violation of fundamental rights with the interventions of the BAR Presidents

200429DE_CE

 

He knows that she can act to avoid having to violate the fundamental rights of citizens with these fraudulently established Titles with codes of procedure which are not applicable.

 

 

Anne-Claude Demierre

Anne-Claude Demierre
President of Fribourg
Council of State

 

Like the Minneapolis Authorities, the President of the State Council has the power and duty to uphold human rights

 

She knows that Me Schaller was prevented from being able to represent his client by the Vaudois Council of State, when he had taken the mandate to defend him and had the power of attorney

150907RS_DE

The President of the Council of State is a mother. She knows that young people have to be able to trust the authorities.

She knows that young people will never accept a justice system that helps criminals violate the rights of other citizens with processes that make them shudder

200605DE_CE

THANKS TO A RECORDING, THE WHOLE WORLD KNOWS THAT GEORGE FLOYD WAS KILLED BY THE JUDICIARY WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO GUARANTEE RESPECT OF HIS FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS. THE WHOLE FUNCTIONING OF THE JUDICIARY IS CALLED INTO QUESTION BY THE TRANSPARENCY BROUGHT BY THIS RECORDING. IT SHOWS THAT JUSTICE DOES NOT EXIST FOR ALL.

Young people understand that silence is not an option in the face of discrimination!

See : TJ 19:30 of 10th June


MINNEAPOLIS HIGH AUTHORITIES REACT TO RESTORE JUSTICE FOR ALL.

The high authorities want to dismantle the rotten part of the judiciary.

They want to remove the immunity that protects public servants who use their power to violate human rights

See TJ 19:30 of Monday 8th June

 

THANKS TO A RECORDING SHOWING THE HORRIBLE BLACKMAIL MADE BY A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION ON A CEO, THE HIGH AUTHORITIES OF THE STATE OF FRIBOURG KNOW HOW THE JUDICIAL APPARATUS IS USED BY MEMBERS OF BROTHERHOODS OF LAWYERS TO VIOLATE FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS. THE ENTIRE FUNCTIONING OF THE SWISS JUDICIAL SYSTEM IS CHALLENGED BY THE TRANSPARENCY PROVIDED BY THIS RECORDING. IT SHOWS THAT JUSTICE DOES NOT EXIST FOR ALL IN SWITZERLAND.

Citizens are asking for justice for all

The Prosecution Officer knows that an elite of citizens has filed a request for a parliamentary inquiry into this dysfunction of the judicial system that allows members of brotherhoods of lawyers to commit crimes with impunity. See exhibit 051217DP_GC

 

BREACH OF ACCESS TO INDEPENDENT TRIBUNALS BY PARLIAMENT

He knows that the expert of the Vaudois Parliament, who processed the request for a parliamentary inquiry, explained that :

1) Courts were not independent of the lawyers brotherhoods.

2) Codes of procedures were not applicable because they do not allow to take into account the interventions of the BAR Presidents

He knows that this is the means used by members of the brotherhoods of lawyers to obtain that prosecutors and magistrates of justice allow them to spoliate citizens with false denunciations.

 

POWER AND DUTY OF THE PROSECUTING OFFICER TO RESPECT HUMAN RIGHTS

The Prosecution Officer knows that he has the power and duty to request a discharge from the President of the Council of State to avoid violating fundamental rights.

See application for discharge : 200604DE_BT

He knows that the latter has the power to act as the Minneapolis authorities did when they discovered the recording that showed the malfunctions of the judiciary.

200605DE_CE

The Prosecution Officer has documents that give evidence of human rights violations, including :

the request for a parliamentary inquiry

051217DP_GC

The intervention of the President of the BAR, Me Richard, which prevents the filing of the criminal complaint against Foetisch so that he can obtain the prescription by not responding to his summons

070329PB_TC

The violation made to Me Schaller by the Council of State of Vaud to be able to defend his client.

150907RS_DE

The document that explains the protection given by the discharge, to avoid having to violate fundamental rights, even if it is threatened by high magistrates.

200608DE_BT

The Prosecution Officer is officially informed by this site that the lawyer of the State of Vaud, who prevented Me Schaller from defending his client, is also the BAR PRESIDENT who intervened to prevent the President of the Court from having Mr. Burnet testify, in the request for a parliamentary inquiry. 

The prosecution officer must know that the dissident lawyer had announced that the Federal Court would confirm this prohibition on Mr. Schaller from being able to represent his client. The facts proved him right. He announced a strike against those who violate fundamental rights.

Swiss judges behave like modern-day slavers. Young people want justice for all and transparent. The rotten part of the judiciary must be dismantled.

See TJ 19:30 of 8th June

 

 
03.06.20 GEORGE FLOYD DIED ASPHYXIATED BY A PUBLIC SERVANT’S KNEE

George Floyd

Video

He died because three sworn white civil servants, who swore to respect the rights guaranteed by the American Constitution, watched him suffocate instead of defending his fundamental rights.

 

 

"They only did it because he was black instead of white"

 

 

IF THE HIGH AUTHORITIES OF THE COUNTRY DO NOT RESPECT THE CONSTITUTION, THEN THERE ARE DEADS

The observation in the USA is that if the high authorities of the country do not want to enforce human rights, it is the beginning of the civil war !

See TJ 19:30 of Sunday, 1st June

It is the transparency of information that makes the country evolve

The Courts are then forced to uphold the Constitution by judging those who violate human rights

 

The situation in Switzerland for the respect of human rights guaranteed by the Constitution

In Switzerland we have an even worse situation than in USA with the members of the brotherhoods of lawyers who have their own rules

Unlike the United States, which can try crimes committed by whites against blacks, Switzerland has no independent court to try crimes committed by members of brotherhoods of lawyers against the people !

It is the challenge of the citizens to obtain that the High Authorities of the country break the silence on this power of members of brotherhoods of lawyers

See exhibit 200603DE_MR

Young people do not know that members of Brotherhoods of lawyers can commit crimes with full impunity, because of the lack of transparency of the country’s high authorities.

They must be informed : See exhibit 200605DE_CE

 
27.05.20 LAUBER CASE: THE JUDICIAL COMMISSION SAVES THE FACE OF THE FEDERAL PARLIAMENT BY REQUESTING THE DISMISSAL OF THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR

See TJ 19h30 du 20.05.20

Me Maurice ROPRAZ declares a new alert :
the game is not won to restore confidence to citizens!

He stresses that his Title of Lawyer does not allow him to enforce fundamental rights

Maurice Ropraz
Me Maurice ROPRAZ
Fribourg State Councillor

Even if he cannot act, Me Maurice ROPRAZ can confirm the facts established by the expert of the Vaudois Parliament which show the violation of fundamental rights.

He is given notice to confirm the facts established by the expert of the Vaudois Parliament and for avoiding a new killing of Zug

See exhibit 200525DE_MR


 

THE STATE COUNCILLOR, LAWYER, ME MAURICE ROPRAZ, DECLARES A NEW ALERT:

"THE DISMISSAL OF THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO RESTORE RESPECT FOR THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF VICTIMS OF ORGANIZED CRIME INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE BAR""

As Michael LAUBER with his Staff, Maurice ROPRAZ, lawyer and State Councillor, knows that a President of the Board of Directors of a company, with a Title of lawyer, can obtain the criminal prescription on his crimes by not responding to the summons of the BAR President..

Me Maurice ROPRAZ declares the alert that a State Councillor, with a Title of lawyer, can do nothing to protect the victims of such crimes. He does not have the means to enforce the fundamental rights of victims. He has no solution to propose !

On the other hand, he does not exclude that State Councillors, who do not have the title of lawyer, including the President of the Council of State of Fribourg, have the power to enforce fundamental rights!

See exhibit 200527DE_CE

 

Me Maurice ROPRAZ can however confirm facts that show the violation of fundamental rights, by the members of the Order of lawyers, in the case where he is given notice to do so

Formal notice

Me Maurice ROPRAZ is therefore given notice to confirm the facts established by the expert of the Vaudois Parliament, which show the violation of fundamental rights with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR

See exhibit 200525DE_MR

The members of the new Judicial Commission of Parliament have just shown that they are aware that they have the power to enforce the Federal Constitution, even if the General Prosecutor and his Staff does not process ion time complaints to give statute of limitations to accused persons.

The confirmation by Maurice ROPRAZ of the facts established by the parliamentary expert is essential to reduce the risk of a civil war with digital weapons soon available to the public.

See exhibit 200527DE_CE

200525DE_MR

200527DE_CE

051217DP_GC

070329PB_TC

20.05.20 LAUBER CASE: REACTION OF PHILIPPE BAUER, STATE COUNCILLOR, TO BE CLARIFIED

How did the FIFA defendants get the prescription of the offence? What happens in the other cases handled by the Attorney General and his General Staff?

The Judicial Commission and its President, Andrea GARONI, have a great responsibility to answer these questions. They must verify that Prosecutor Lauber respects the Constitution with his way of working!

See interview of May 13, 2020 de Andrea GARONI.

The State Councillor, Philippe BAUER, reacts by saying that a file must be established and a decision must be taken.

See reaction of May 13, 2020 of Philippe BAUER

His statement is worrisome, when we know that Philippe BAUER says that a Bar President has the right to prevent a Prosecutor from investigating a criminal complaint so that criminals get the prescription of the offence!

Andrea CARONI
Andrea GARONI
CJ Président
LAWYER

PHILIPPE BAUER’S DISTURBING STATEMENT: ACCORDING TO HIM, A BAR PRESIDENT RESPECTS THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION WHEN THANKS TO HIS INTERVENTION AN ACCUSED CAN GET THE PRESCRIPTION OF THE OFFENCE

Should we consider that the President of the Bar of FIFA intervened with the General Prosecutor Michael LAUBER so that the FIFA defendants could get the prescription?

This disrespectful scenario of the Constitution is very likely. In fact, Philippe BAUER was himself the subject of a criminal complaint that the Prosecutor LAUBER with his General Staff prevented from investigating.

 

This criminal complaint concerned the interventions of the President of the Bar, that allow criminals, members of brotherhoods of lawyers, to commit crimes with impunity

See exhibit: 200518DE_CJ

 

The approach of Andrea GARONI, President of the new judicial commission, to want to question the Attorney General, is very important.

The questions will have to be about constitutional compliance.

He is the ideal President to clarify the existence of these interventions of the President of the BAR, which allow to violate fundamental rights.

Citizens need to know whether Parliament is defending the values of Philippe BAUER or those of the Swiss Constitution

 

These Constitutional Values had been described by Me François de ROUGEMONT, the parliamentary expert who had processed the request for parliamentary inquiry

 

De Rougemont was a lawyer himself. He said that the procedural codes were not applicable in the "OA" case. Yet Philippe BAUER used them to give advantages to his brotherhood !

Prosecutor LAUBER protected him by knowing the contents of the request for parliamentary investigation

See exhibit : 051217DP_GC

 

To be continued !

200518DE_CJ
13.05.20 AN INSIDER OF PARLIAMENT, WITNESS OF CRIME ORGANIZED BY HIS BROTHERHOOD, MUST BLOW THE WHISTLE TO PARLIAMENT

On 21 February 2020, Nicolas Mattenberger was elected Member of Parliament. He discovered the request for a parliamentary inquiry.

See exhibit : 051217DP_GC

He can confirm to the parliamentarians, that they allow the members of his brotherhood to commit crimes with impunity with a rule hidden to the people.

Me Nicolas MATTENBERGER

Me Nicolas Mattenberger
Vaud Parliament Deputy
Bar Association Member

THE DEPUTY, ME NICOLAS MATTENBERGER, HAS JUST DISCOVERED THAT HIS COLLEAGUE FOETISCH OBTAINED THE PENAL PESCRIPTION BY NOT RESPONDING TO THE CONVOCATIONS OF THE BAR PRESIDENT

This rule, hidden from the people, was highlighted in 2006 by the parliamentary expert who had to process the request for a parliamentary inquiry.

He raised the question:

« “What was the reason given by Bar President Richard to deny your lawyer the right to file a criminal complaint against Patrick Foetisch, when he had violated the copyright and was going to reach the prescription for the penal offence.»

The answer was :

« That Foetisch did not respond to the summons of the Bar President. »

It is likely that among the 150 members of Parliament, the majority of them do not know that it is enough for a member of his brotherhood not to answer to the Bar President summons to obtain the criminal prescription on a penal offence.

 

Me Nicolas MATTENBERGER can confirm to all the deputies that this rule does not appear in any code of procedure, as explained, Me de Rougemont, the expert of Parliament in 2006.

See exhibit 200512DE_NM

In 2007, the parliamentary expert, Me De ROUGEMONT, had already repeated it to the Public delegation. Nicolas MATTENBERGER had been kept out of the processing of this request for a parliamentary inquiry by Me De Rougemont.

See exhibit 070827DP_GC

Today, he is the witness who must raise the alarm to put an end to this situation. As a member of Parliament, he cannot allow his brotherhood to discredit Parliament with a right hidden to the people.

 

200512DE_NM
06.05.20 THE JUDICIAL COMMISSION IS EXAMINING THE LAUBER METHOD FOR OBTAINING THE PRESCRIPTION IN THE CASE OF THE “NOBLE REASON”

Christian Luscher
Christian Luscher
Parliament Leader
CJ MEMBER

(Judicial Commission Member)

Christian Luscher called back on the news, that a company blocked by confinement no longer generates revenue. This endangers the Swiss economy

See TJ 19h30, 3.05.2020

MICHAEL LAUBER MUST ANSWER 6 QUESTIONS TO THE JUDICIAL COMMISSION OF PARLIAMENT ON THE ACTIONS HE TOOK TO ENFORCE THE CONSTITUTION WHEN HE KNEW THAT A PRESIDENT WAS UNDER PRESSURE FROM A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION

He will have to reveal the technique of the *NOBLE REASON" which allows an executive Board President, member of the Bar Association, to obtain the prescription simply by not responding to the convocations of the Bar President.

The members of the Judicial Commission will have to clarify the reasons why, the public does not know that an executive board President of company can obtain the prescription for criminal offences that he commits with impunity at the following condition:

“to be a member of the Bar Association and not to respond to the summons of the Bar President”

See exhibit 200507DE_CJ

In 2007, Me de Rougemont, an expert of Parliament, had explained these shortcomings of the codes of procedure.

See 070928DP_GC

He had said that this prescription, obtained by the members of the Bar Association, who are not responding to the summons of the bar President, could provoke a new killing of Zug.

Is that what the Prosecutors are trying to do ?

 

The only thing, which is sure,is that by being able to obtain the prescription by not responding to the summons of the President, an executive board President, member of the Bar Association, can block a company, as does the confinement due to the coronavirus.

As Christian Luscher explains, this jeopardizes the economy.

What will Michael Lauber answer to question Nr 6 ? 

(question 6 is at page 7 of exhibit 200205DE_ML)

200507DE_CJ
29.04.20 PARLIAMENTARIANS RIDICULED BY THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR THEY ELECTED: A NATIONAL COUNCILLOR FINALLY REACTS!

Defendants obtain prescription with General Prosecutor violating procedural guarantees

See TJ 19h30 27.04.2020

The National Councillor, Lorenz HESS, does not appreciate the way in which Parliament is ridiculed to the people by the General Prosecutor, whom he elected.

Lorenz HESS
Lorenz HESS
National
Councillor

He recalls that the lack of transparency of the General Prosecutor’s work is unacceptable

He is calling for the dismissal of the General Prosecutor

 

The General Prosecutor must be transparent. He does not have the right to conduct secret sessions, just as a motorist does not have the right to drive in the wrong direction on the highway.

The one who has a lot of power cannot afford to do what another citizen could not do.

THE PARLIAMENT OF FRIBOURG IS INVITED TO ENHANCE THE ROLE OF PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, BY MAKING THE ACTIONS OF PROSECUTORS TRANSPARENT AND INVOLVING THEM IN THE RESULTS

An expert of the Vaudois Parliament has already made the same analysis as Lorenz HESS. He name is François de Rougemont.

The latter had been mandated by the Vaudois parliament to make transparent the actions of the judicial magistrates after the killing of Zug.

 

Here is an example on the lack of transparency, given by Me de Rougemont, which shows a dysfunction of justice, as noted by Lorenz HESSS

Me de Rougemont had to address the following request for parliamentary inquiry : 051217DP_GC

After reading the request for inquiry, he asked the question :

« What is the reason given by President Richard for refusing to allow Mr. Foetisch to be the subject of a criminal complaint? »

When he became aware of the invoked reason by the President of the Bar, he said that this type of reason could lead to one killing of Zug.

No General Prosecutor wanted to know this Noble REASON invoked by the President of the Bar to prevent the filing of a criminal complaint against Foetisch.

No parliamentarian knows this Noble REASON, while it puts them in danger of death.

The General Prosecutors used this prohibition against filing a complaint, made by the President of the Bar, to grant the prescription to Mr. Foetisch

This Noble REASON is like the content of the secret interviews between Michael LAUBER and the FIFA defendants. It is used to cover up organized crime. The lack of transparency ridicules the parliamentarians who elected these magistrates and puts them in danger of death without them knowing it

This Noble REASON invoked by the President of the BAR will be revealed to the President of the Council of State, who was also deceived by the General Prosecutor

See 200429DE_CE

A draft amendment to the Code of Procedure was submitted to the Fribourg Parliament to enhance the function of Prosecutor by making his actions transparent and by involving him in the results he obtained.

See 200427_24H

(Update of April, 30th)

See Project submission to Parliament:

200430DE_KW

200430DE_KW

200427_24H

 

22.04.20 CORONAVIRUS DEATHS FORCE AUTHORITIES TO BE TRANSPARENT ABOUT THE INVENTIONS OF THE WORLD’S DISRESPECTFUL ECONOMISTS

CORONAVIRUS has destroyed the fabulous grey curtain that has surrounded PUNJAB for 30 years

Pendjab1
The Punjab Paradise, protected by
the fabulous grey curtain of economists, as always known by young people under 30
.

For the first time, PUNJAB youth discover that economists, who set up this fabulous grey curtain, were hiding a wonder of the world: «the HIMALAYAN chain

See TJ 19h30, 13/04/2020

PENDJAB

The grey curtain of the Punjab Paradise severely damaged by the CORONAVIRUS reveals to young people :
Another World

 

 

THE SWISS HAVE NOT YET DISCOVERED THE VERY «NOBLE REASON» THAT ALLOWS THE BÂTONNIERS TO FORCE JUDGES TO IMMOBILIZE COMPANIES FOR ECONOMISTS WHO VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION. NEVERTHELESS, THANKS TO THE CORONAVIRUS,THEY KNOW THE COST OF A COMPANY IMMOBILIZATION DURING 3 MONTHS.

Thanks to the deaths of the CORONAVIRUS, two Fribourg judges, Dina BETI and Catherine OVERNAY, have just realized that the immobilization of a company by Bâtonniers, with a VERY NOBLE REASON KEPT SECRET, violates the Constitution and creates damage.

These judges heard the alarmist statement of the General PROSECUTOR, Eric COTTIER. The latter complains about the new procedures, put in place by some parliamentarians, which he must applied to respect this very NOBLE REASON.

These judges will ask the General Prosecutor, Eric COTTIER, to reveal to all Parliamentarians this very NOBLE REASON, which allows the Bâtonnier to immobilize a company and to create economic damages like a coronavirus.

In 10 days, not only will the CORONAVIRUS have destroyed the grey curtain that hid the HIMALAYAS from the young, but it will also have made all the transparency on this very NOBLE REASON, which can be invoked by the Bâtonniers to allow the economists to violate the Constitution.

Thanks to Dina BETI and Catherine OVERNAY to reveal to all parliamentarians: the very NOBLE REASON invoked by the Bâtonniers which allows them to immobilize a company.

Read : 200421DE_DB

To read the message sent to the Vaudois Parliamentarians who do not know the very NOBLE REASON :

200422DE_GC

Soon on this site, everyone will know the very NOBLE REASON, which can invoke the Bâtonniers to immobilize a company

200422DE_GC

TJ 19h30

15.04.20 THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR HAS CLEARED HIS STAFF

Read :

Prosecutor’s response

Eric Cottier
General Prosecutor
Eric COTTIER

 

ALARMIST STATEMENT BY GENERAL PROESECUTOR ERIC COTTIER 

The new procedures, which the legislator makes him do, do not works !

These new procedures could lead to the killing of Zug, according to the expertise of Me de Rougemont

 

He has the burden of proof that an order has been received by the recipient and the new procedures are flawed.

He said that orders should be sent by registered mail so that he has proof that the recipient has received it

Read page 11 and 12 of Exhibit  200414DE_EC

All parliamentarians are notified of the malfunctioning of their new procedures

Read : 200415DE_GC

 

 
08.04.20 60 DEATHS IN EMS RETREAT HOUSE KILLED BY THOSE WHO HAD TO PROTECT THEM: HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ACCUSE THE AUTHORITIES OF HAVING IMPLEMENTED FLAWED PROCEDURES

60 seniors were confined in a Vaud EMS RETREAT HOUSE. They were infected without their knowledge by those who were supposed to protect them. They died because the procedures put in place to protect them were not designed to protect them from coronavirus

Pandemic professionals warned the Authorities that those who had to protect them had neither the equipment nor the proper procedures to protect these seniors from a virus escaped from a P4 laboratory

 

Listen:

TJ 19h30 du 4 avril

Coronavirus

 

This is the sad record of the Vaud executive power which failed to manage the risk of coronavirus for EMS RETREAT HOUSE

 

MORALITY

If the authorities want to avoid deaths, they must set up procedures that are efficient.

This is true for all areas, as the Zug killing showed it in the past

14 DEAD KILLED IN THE ZOUG PARLIAMENT BY THOSE WHO WERE SUPPOSED TO PROTECT THEM: THE EXPERT OF THE VAUD PARLIAMENT EXPLAINED THAT IT WAS THE JUDICIAL PROCEDURES PUT IN PLACE BY THE PARLIAMENT THAT HAD KILLED THEM

In 2001, there were 14 bereaved families in Zug because the legal procedures that Parliament had put in place were flawed. Their deaths were caused by these procedures which should have protected them.

The Vaud Parliament commissioned an expert to identify flawed legal procedures that endangered citizens and could lead to the death of parliamentarians.

In a request for a parliamentary investigation, the parliament expert had identified two procedures allowing the President of the Bar to obstruct and distort the judicial action. These procedures violated human rights and could lead to the death of Members of Parliament.

The first procedure was the authorization required of the President of the Bar to file a complaint against a member of a association of lawyers

The second procedure was the prohibition that the President of the Bar can make to a single witness of a false denunciation to testify

See investigation request :051217DP_GC

Parliament’s expert explained that :

1) No President of the Court could disobey the President of the BAR

2) In order not to disobey the President of the Bar, a President of the Court may issue an order violating human rights, (=Denial of justice)

None of these procedures allowing a President of the Bar to falsify a trial has been corrected by Parliament

 

FROM THE LESSON TO DRAW OF 60 NEW DEATHS

There are now 60 families in mourning in the Vaud State because the procedures put in place by the Authorities are flawed and they killed the seniors they were supposed to protect.

This is the worst score of all the French Swiss State.

There may be an explanation: the Authorities do not listen to the experts of Parliament

 

THE ALERT IS SENT TO THE COUNCIL OF STATE AND PARLIAMENT AND THEIR FAMILIES TO ANSWER TWO QUESTIONS:

These two questions show the danger that awaits all citizens who have a dispute with a member of an association of lawyers.

It is the danger established by the parliament expert that has not been corrected.

Each to answer the Q1 and Q2 questions put to the President of the Council of State of Fribourg

See : 200407DE_CE

Two Fribourg magistrates will also answer these two questions,

To be continued

200407DE_CE
01.04.20 THE VICE-CHAIRMAN OF THE FRIBOURG COURT BLOWS THE WHISTLE ON THE PARLIAMENTARIAN’S COMPULSION ON THE COURTS EXERTED BY A FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE BAR. SHE MAKES A PROFESSIONAL MISTAKE TO BE HEARD

Forced to recuse herself, Catherine Overney does not do so to remind that the Councilor of States, Philippe BAUER, has obtained from the TF that the judges cannot disobey to a Bar President, member of a criminal organization.

Philippe BAUER

Philippe BAUER
Parliament Councillor
Put on the spot by a Fribourg Judge

 

This interdiction to disobey allows former Bar President, members of criminal organization, to commit economic crimes with full impunity.

 

IN 2005, THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT, BERTRAND SAUTEREL, SAID THAT HE COULD NOT DISOBEY THE BAR PRESIDENT WHO HAD FORBIDDEN A WITNESS TO TESTIFY. HE COULD THEREFORE NOT MAKE TESTIFY THE SINGLE WITNESS OF A FALSE DENUNCIATION WHERE A CEO HAD BEEN FORCED TO THREATEN ONE OF HIS DIRECTORS OF DISMISSAL, FOR THE CASE WHERE HE WOULD REFUSED TO YIELD TO THE CLAME OF A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION!

The Court of Neuchâtel had ruled unlawful that a President of the Bar could prevent a witness of a false denunciation from testifying, as the Bar President was knowing that the President of the Courts could not disobey him, and consequently he could not he could not oppose this ban made by the Bar President

Philippe BAUER had obtained that the TF reversed the judgment by saying that it was up to the victim’s lawyer, to disobey the Bar President to avoid damage to the victim, rather that it is the President of the Court who has the right to disobey the Bar President in order to have the witness testify about the false denunciation

 

FOR INTRODUCTION :

Everyone has to read the following form:

200327DE_IG

and answer questions Q1 and Q2 on page 3, point 2.2.2

THEN DISCOVER C. OVERNEY’S STRATEGY :

Since she could not disobey the Bar President, she chose to make a professional mistake to be put on notice to take a position on questions Q1 and Q2.

To read : 200401DE_CO

This is not an "april poisson" !

It is up to everyone to appreciate his approach which shows that Philippe BAUER is a member of a criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament!

And also that this criminal organization is protected by Michael LAUBER who violates procedural safeguards with lies !

 

051217DP_GC

200327DE_IG

200401DE_CO

25.03.20 ON MARCH 20 : ENIGMATIC LETTER (DATED 12.03) FROM THE MPC SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY CONCERNING 2020 FEBRUARY MONTH

Did the Vaud Public Prosecutor contact the MPC Supervisory Authority in February 2020 ?

Michael LAUBER

Michael LAUBER
Confederation
General Prosecutor

Did Michael Lauber violate procedural safeguards with lies only for FIFA case or also for other cases ?

 

 

Can a Prosecutor logically violate his oath only in one case ?

 

 

Who pays a prosecutor’s salary
and for what purpose ?

 

JUST BEFORE THE MPC SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY FOUND THAT MICHAEL LAUBER VIOLATED THE PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS WITH LIES, RESURGENCES OF HIS METHOD APPEARED IN ANOTHER CASE.

In February, General Prosecutor Eric COTTIER has to investigate violations of procedural safeguards with lies, where the MPC and the Bar association were involved.

He was aware that the MPC Supervisory Authority has to provide a response to Mr. Erni on the matter described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry. He knew that this case concerned the actions of Christian BETTEX, the President of the Bar association 051217DP_GC

He also knew that the MPC Supervisory Authority had not yet completed its investigation into the breach of procedural safeguards by Michael LAUBER.

How to explain that the MPC Supervisory Authority suddenly sent a response showing that it had not completed its investigation to Mr. Erni and that this response was never notified to Mr. Erni?

Was there an informal meeting, without Minutes, between the Public Ministries?

Who organized the sending of these registered letters that do not arrived ? There have been several letters. There is the example of the order of December 6, 2019, quoted by the General Staff of the Prosecutor Cottier, see Exhibit 200313DE_GC page 3, point 2 (still not found)

There is here, the letter of February 10 from the Supervisory Authority of the MPC, whose existence was first revealed on March 20?

See exhibit 200325DE_CC

 

PRICE TO BE PAID BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE VIOLATION OF PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS BY THOSE WHO HAVE TOO MUCH POWER :

Today the World is in danger by the risk of coronavirus resurgence. The global contamination is obviously coming from people who have too much power and who have violated security procedures.

If we want credible justice, we cannot tolerate a general Prosecutor violating his oath, just as we cannot tolerate people with too much power endangering citizens with coronavirus.

Prosecutors are paid to protect citizens, and not to destroy them by violating procedural safeguards with lies

 
18.3.20 VIOLATION OF THE GUARANTEES OF PROCEEDINGS WITH LIES: ERIC COTTIER FALSELY ACCUSED

Finding of 7 March 2020 :

The General Staff of the Prosecutor General Eric COTTIER makes the Prosecutor appear to be the accomplice of a fraud with a judicial order that can only be a fake Title.

See exhibit: 200207DE_EC

Eric COTTIER
Eric COTTIER
Vaud General Prosecutor
slandered on March 7, 2020

13 March 2020:

Complaint is filed with the Vaud Parliament

200313DE_GC

See explanations point 2, page 3 of the complaint

 

 

14 MARCH: ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC COTTIER PARTIALLY DISAVOWS HIS STAFF FOR ACCUSING HIM OF GIVING ADVANTAGES TO ME CHRISTIAN BETTEX

The General Staff of Eric COTTIER claimed that a decision concerning Me Christian BETTEX was final and enforceable on 7 March 2020.

The General Prosecutor disavowed his General Staff by stating that the decision was not binding and final on 7 March 2020. It was still possible to appeal against the judicial order on March 7!!

See exhibit 200314DE_EC

The Prosecutor suggested that he was aware of the gross violation of procedural guarantees, but he refuses to give explanations.

 

The case is much more serious than we thought.

It could help to understand the blackmail done with false denunciation and death threats that were apparently mounted by magistrates against the victim of professional blackmail

The Parliament is informed of the position taken by the General Prosecutor which is for the moment not comprehensible, in view of his refusal to give explanations

See complaint addendum addressed to the Vaud Parliament

200318DE_GC

Observation :

The Prosecutor’s Silence on the violation of procedural guarantees is worrisome.

He proceeded like Michael Lauber. A lawyer, who is the subject of an investigation by the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Confederation, claims that these Prosecutors violate the guarantees of proceedings under pressure from members of Parliament.

C'This is very serious since Eric Cottier knows the methods of coercion used against a CEO to blackmail one of his directors. He knows how Me BETTEX censored Me Schaller who was not a member of the Bar Association

To be continued.

 

 
11.03.20 TERRIFYING SANCTION AGAINST THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR OF THE CONFEDERATION WHO VIOLATED HIS OATH

For one year the General Prosecutor will receive only 92% of his salary, that is an invitation made to him to continue to violate the guarantees of procedures and to lie to give benefits to third parties.

Michael LAUBER
Michael LAUBER
General Prosecutor

Encouraged by Parliament to violate his Oath if not revoked

TJ du 4 mars

PARLIAMENT COULD ENCOURAGE PROSECUTORS AND JUDICIAL OFFICERS TO VIOLATE PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES AND TO LIE BY NOT DISMISSING THE PROSECUTOR

By reducing the Prosecutor’s salary by 8% for one year, instead of revoking it Parliament could show that the Value of the Oath of the magistrates who must render justice has no value.

If he does not dismiss the Prosecutor, Parliament gives a strong signal to the dissident lawyer who has undertaken to have a Federal Councillor shot down by saying that the most senior leaders of Swiss Authoroties no longer want to enforce the Federal Constitution

The advantages that an Attorney General can give to members of a criminal organization by lying with secret hearings are well above 8% of his salary, or CHF 24,000

We understand that a former Federal Judge, like Claude ROUILLER, made a false expertise to cover organized crime. Indeed, if the Prosecutors who protect him risk only 8% of their salary for one year, they can amply compensate this loss of salary with secret agreements made without Minutes! !

PrWe understand that a former Federal Judge, like Claude ROUILLER, made a false expertise to cover organized crime. Indeed, if the Prosecutors who protect him risk only 8% of their salary for one year, they can amply compensate this loss of salary with secret agreements without Minutes! :

171214MP_DE

Attention will also be given to the General Staff of Vaud general Prosecutor, and to the answers given by the Vaud Parliament:

200207DE_EC

 
04.03.20 MORE DANGEROUS DEATH THREATS TO OUR PEOPLE THAN CORONAVIRUS

On March 1st, the President of the Council of State discovered that a lawyer, unique witness of a false denunciation against his client, must disobey the President of the Bar in order to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of his client .

Anne-Claude Demierre

Anne-Claude DEMIERRE
President of
Fribourg State Council

She knows that Fribourg judges are complicit in death threats against a lawyer client, victim of a false denunciation, but she does not know the pressure exerted by the Attorney General of the Confederation, Michael Lauber, who had to give explanations to the Supervisory Authority on this case.

To read :

200301DE_CE

+ annexes

200225DE_TC

200226DE_TC

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE CONFEDERATION COMPLICIT IN CONSTRAINT ON LAWYER AND DEATH THREATS ON CITIZENS TO GIVE BENEFITS TO LAW PROFESSIONALS

The President of the Council of State discovered that no lawyer dared to disobey the President of the Bar following the threats of reprisal that are heard in a recording taken by a private detective.

She does not yet know that this case was brought before the Supervisory Authority of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Confederation with the argument that the Attorney General of the Confederation had failed to respect the fundamental rights that his duty of office required him to perform respect.

On the contrary, he would have grossly violated procedural guarantees to give benefits to law enforcement professionals.

She does not know that Attorney General, Eric COTTIER, is awaiting a response from this Supervisory Authority in the context of the criminal complaint filed against Jean-Benoît Meuwly and Sonia Bulliard Grosset.

Michael LAUBER

Michael LAUBER
General Prosecutor
Of the confederation

Today, March 4, 2020, the Supervisory Authority of the Office of the Attorney General announced that the Attorney General had lied.

From now on, Attorney General Eric Cottier should be able to break the OMERTA on this case of fraud committed by the Bar Association with the protection of the Attorney General of the Confederation. The investigation of the criminal complaint could finally begin, without the pressure exerted by Michael Lauber, the Prosecutor.

200301DE_EC

 
26.02.20 FRIBOURGEOIS JUDGES COMPLICIT IN FRAUD AND DEATH THREATS 

The President of the Council of State, Anne-Claude DEMIERRE is alerted

See the letter:

200226DE_CE

Anne-Claude DEMIERRE
Anne-Claude Demierre
Président
Fribourg State Council

 

Criminal complaint was filed

MR. BRUNO BOSCHUNG, FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE GRAND COUNCIL OF FRIBOURG, HAD SOUGHT TO CLARIFY THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BAR AND THE COURTS

He was surprised that the Constitution allowed a President to prevent the filing of a criminal complaint against the President of a company that violated copyright.

This was the case described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry in which the President of the Bar, Philippe RICHARD, had forbidden Patrick Foetisch, President of ICSA, to be the subject of a criminal complaint.

 

TWO FRIBOURGEOIS JUDGES HAVE JUST RESPONDED IN THEIR OWN WAY:

he is Jean-Benoît Meuwly, see 200225DE_TC

and Sonia Bulliard Grosset, see 200226DE_TC

They judge their own recusal, they violate the right to be heard to give benefits to members of the Bar Association

they could be the responsible for death threats in a case of professional blackmail, involving Vaudois judges. They use these threats so that their victims don’t dare complain about the violation of procedural guarantees.

This is the case where the President of the Bar, Philippe Richard, had forbidden Patrick Foetisch to be the subject of a criminal complaint

200226DE_CE
19.02.20 CRYPTO CASE: SERIOUS VIOLATION OF THE CONSTITUTION BY FEDERAL COUNCILLORS ACTING FOR A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION

A lawyer says that Switzerland needs a Maurice Bavaud who shoot a Federal Councillor to restore respect for the Values of the Constitution… an opinion from a law enforcement professional that is less and less surprising with the Crypto Case

Micheline Calmy-Rey

Micheline Calmy-Rey questioned by the RTS on February 12 chooses to remain silent

Silence du 12.02.2020

Federal Councillors are not above the law !

They are sworn in. They cannot give benefits to members of secret societies by violating the Constitution.

Why did a lawyer say that Switzerland needs a Maurice BAVAUD who shoots a Federal Councillor ?

What is the relationship between the Federal Council and the Swiss Bar Association that provoked this lawyer’s reaction ?

 

ENCRYPTED COMMUNICATION MONITORING OF APPROXIMATELY 100 COUNTRIES WITH A CODE MACHINE THAT IS RIGGED WITHOUT THE KNOWLEDGE OF USERS IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE INVOLVING SEVERAL FEDERAL COUNCILLORS

Federal Councillors are expected not to allow a private company to rig machines to secretly monitor countries on behalf of third countries.

It is clear that Micheline Calmy-REY, who chose to remain silent, also helped Patrick Foetisch and his criminal organization to violate the Constitution in a filthy way.

If a lawyer claims that Federal Councillors violate the Constitution to serve the interests of a powerful criminal organization, the Crypto case gives a terrifying dimension to his remarks :

"We observe that the discrimination in the by-election to the Council of State of the Canton of Vaud, described below, is related to the censorship exercised by federal councillors alleged accomplices of this criminal organization”.

Their modus operandi is to impose the Law of Silence on organized crime.

It is time for the Federal Council to break the silence on the actions of members of this criminal organization who collaborate with foreign powers and the Swiss Federation of Lawyers.

Everyone must be wondering why the Crypto case is only made public today.

It should be noted that many lawyers complain about being threatened and censored when they want to defend the Values of the Constitution….

...the recordings made public by Edward Snowden and private detectives may explain the press’s choice to reveal the Crypto case today.

See TJ 19h30 12.02.2020

See TJ 19h30 14.02.2020

Explanations will be required from the Federal Council and the Swiss Federation of Lawyers on the actions of their members that violate the Constitution

 

To be continued

 
12.02.20 REPEATED BREACH OF PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS BY THE GRAND COUNCIL OFFICE

Sonia BUTERA

Sonia BUTERA
Grand Council
Vice President

 

THE OFFICE OF THE GRAND COUNCIL, WHOSE RECUSAL HAS BEEN REQUESTED, CONTINUES TO MAKE DECISIONS THAT RAISE QUESTIONS OF ETHICS AND DIGNITY OF PARLIAMENT

Lawyer reported breach of procedural safeguards by Grand Council Office:

See exhibit 200130DE_GC

Grand Council Office does not take this into account

See exhibit: 200204SB_DE

The candidate of the Group on Ethics of Respect for the Swiss Constitutions recalls the rules of ethics that the people are entitled to expect from elected officials. He points out that the lawyer only did his work by pointing out that the Grand Council Office could not judge itself for its request for recusal.

See exhibit 200206DE_SB

 
05.02.20 THE DIGNITY OF PARLIAMENT IS AT STAKE

Marc-Olivier BUFFAT

The Deputy Marc Olivier Buffat reacts

THE GRAND COUNCIL OFFICE MANIPULATES THE PUBLIC, A LAWYER RESPONDS :

1) Members of the Office of the Grand Council are not entitled to judge themselves for the application of their recusal

2) Members of the Grand Council Office do not have the right to decide that an appeal is not an appeal

On the recommendation of the lawyer an appeal is filed as well as a complaint to the Management Commission


See the appeal 200130DE_GC


See the vidéo of the session du January 28, 2020

 
29.01.20 RESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION NOT YET WON

What will BETTEX advise to do?

THE GRAND COUNCIL OFFICE HAS DECIDED THAT IT MAY RULE ON ITS OWN OBJECTION: IT REFUSES TO RECUSE ITSELF

 

NEW APPEAL IS FILED

To read : 200125DE_GC

The Constitution does not allow the Grand Council Office to judge itself for the application of its recusal and the law on political rights does not allow it any more

The deputies should know it!

 

To be  continued

 
23.01.20 REQUEST FOR THE IMPEACHMENT OF THE KING AND MENTOR OF THE SWISS BÂTONNIERS

Patrick Foetisch
Me Patrick FOETISCH
Mentor of the Swiss Bâtonniers

LAWYERS, MAGISTRATES OR MEMBERS OF THE ORDER, USE DENIAL OF JUSTICE AND DEATH THREATS TO OPPOSE THE IMPEACHMENT OF THEIR MENTOR AND KING OF EXCEPTION

Patrick FOETISCH is the prestigious member of a criminal organization. This organization does not hesitate to use false denunciation with professional blackmail as a record shows.

To discover how Sonia Bulliard Grosset, President of the Tribunal de la Broye, makes a denial of justice so that the lower right takes precedence over the higher right.

To discover the relations that bind the judges to the Bâtonniers which allows a judge to judge his own application for recusal:

200123DE_TC


After the climate emergency, there is the extreme legal emergency

200123DE_TC
15.01.20 CONSTITUTION VALUES RESPECT

Jeunes activistes

Bank violates Constitutional Values

JUDGMENT :
“it is the higher right that must prevail!”

IF HE LAW DOES NOT ALLOW TO RESPECT THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION: THE BANK IS IN ITS WRONG

EXEMPLARY JUGMENT :

See Judgment (TJ 19h30 RTS / Monday January 13, 2020)

"One can act by breaking the law to defend a higher Right""

WELL DONE THE YOUNG ACTIVISTS
for having the courage to break the law to uphold the superior law that protects the Values of the Constitution
.

The right must not be used to circumvent the Values of our Constitution.

 “The bank did not have the right to violate the Values of the Constitution on the pretext that the law allows it to do so”

 

 
8.01.20
APPEAL

VAUD

RESPECT ET TRANSPARENCY

These are the two key values that Denis ERNI, the candidate for the complementary election to the Council of State, will apply to enforce the Vaud Constitution.


He hopes that his appeal, to put an end to his discrimination for this election, will be treated with these two Values

 
1.01.20 THE "DIS" WANTS TO VIOLATE THE VAUD CONSTITUTION AGAIN".

Grand Council expert, hired by members of Parliament to avoid another Zug killing, would turn in his grave !

Béatrice Métraux

Béatrice Métraux
State Councillor
DIS Chief

 

THE COUNCILLOR OF STATE BÉATRICE MÉTRAUX  IS GIVEN NOTICE THAT HER DEPARTMENT HAS ALREADY BEEN REJECTED THREE TIMES BY COURT FOR VIOLATING PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES.

Denis ERNI, the candidate for election to the Council of State, has sent to Béatrice MÉTRAUX the explanations of François de ROUGEMONT, the expert of the Grand Council, concerning the violation of procedural guarantees by her department

From now on, Ms Béatrice MÉTRAUX can no longer ignore how the Grand Council allows legal professionals to commit economic crime with impunity…. and with the help of his department!!

Discover here the explanations of the Grand Council expert, François de Rougemont :

191231DE_BM

191231DE_BM

 

2020 2020 GOALS MAKING TRANSPARENT THE ACTIONS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND JUDGES, WHO ARE VIOLATING THE VALUES OF OUR CONSTITUTION

 

 

 

2020

 

HAPPY NEW YEAR

 

Best Wishes to all the readers for a good Health

 

 

2019

 

THE YEAR 2019 IN REVIEW

 

CITIZENS BEGIN TO REALIZE THAT THEY CAN NO LONGER TRUST THEIR ELECTED PEOPLE TO ENFORCE FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS

 

 
25.12.19 VINCENT DUVOISIN INFORMED OF THE APPEAL ON THE IRREGULARITIES OF THE PREPARATION OF THE ELECTIONS TO THE COUNCIL OF STATE: THE APPEAL MUST AVOID DISCRIMINATION OF A CANDIDATE FOR THE ELECTION

The Ethics and Respect for the Constitution group presented its Candidate with flaws in its list related to the actions of the State Lawyer. It calls for the correction of irregularities in the preparation of elections so that the Vaud Constitution can be respected.

Candidats

TJ du 19h30 du 23.12.2019

Vincent Duvoisin is made aware that the application of the law on political rights is not possible until the Grand Council has corrected the irregularities that led to this election. He received the copy of the letter below

To read :191223DE_GC

THE DATE OF 24 DECEMBER IS NOT BLOCKING FOR DENIS ERNI, THE SURPRISE CANDIDATE, PROVIDED THAT THE AUTHORITIES RESPECT THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE VAUD CONSTITUTION

Today :

Women complain that the authorities do not respect the principle of equality guaranteed in the Constitution.

Young people complain that the authorities are not taking the necessary measures in the face of the climate emergency to preserve the quality of life, which is a fundamental right enshrined in the Constitution.

They are trying to change the codes for the election to the Council of State to be heard

The Grand Council has taken no corrective action to enforce the Values of the Constitution. On the contrary, lawyers from the state, such as Me Christian BETTEX, block respect for the fundamental rights of citizens enshrined in in the Vaud Constitution.

The Ethics and Respect for the Constitution group observes that to put an end to all these demands, it is enough to have elected members of the Council of State who enforce the Values of the Constitution.

This group presented a candidate who wants to enforce the Values of the Constitution and who can fulfill all the conditions laid down by the application of the law on political rights. This is possible only if he is not discriminated against by the irregularities which led to this election.

A recording, taken by a private detective, shows how state lawyers have the means to economically boycott candidates who demand respect for the Values of the Constitution by blackmailing them.

To be continued

 

Candidats

191211DE_GC

191222DE_GC

191223DE_GC

18.12.19 A LEGAL RECOURSE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE ELECTION TO THE COUNCIL OF STATE

The actions of Christian BETTEX, State lawyer, violate the Vaud Constitution. They disadvantage candidates who are victims of economic boycott organized by the Bar Association..

The President of the Grand Council  will have to ensure compliance with the Vaud Constitution

Yves Ravenel
Yves RAVENEL
President of
the Grand Council

ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES MUST ENSURE RESPECT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF VAUD FOR ALL CITIZENS, NOT ONLY FOR MEMBERS OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION AND THEIR PROTECTED RELATIONS

The Grand Council must ensure that candidates for election to the Council of State, victim of economic boycott by the Bar Association with the complicity of the State Lawyer, Me Christian BETTEX, have the means to conduct fairly their electoral campaign.

It will be up to the President of the Grand Council, Yves RAVENEL, to enforce the Values of the Constitution.

The group of respect for the Swiss Constitutions will support the candidacy of Denis ERNI with the list «Ethics and Respect for the Constitution».

To read the recourse  :

 

191211DE_GC

 

To be continued

191211DE_GC
11.12.19 SERIOUS IRREGULARITIES OF THE STATE LAWYER WILL VITIATE THE ELECTIONS OF THE SUCCESSOR OF JACQUELINE DE QUATTRO

If Pascal Broulis and Jacqueline de QUATTRO made the taxpayer pay their lawyer to deal with private matters, Pierre-Yves MAILLARD surpassed them.

191206_24H

The latter observed silence on an organized crime case, where he made the taxpayer pay the state lawyer to give benefits to members of his brotherhood.

Me Christian BETTEX
Me Christian BETTEX
State Lawyer

A RECORDING MADE BY A PRIVATE DETECTIVE HAS FINALLY BEEN MADE PUBLIC. IT PROVES THAT THE STATE LAWYER, CHRISTIAN BETTEX, WAS INVOLVED IN A BLACKMAIL CASE TO ECONOMIC BOYCOTT IN CONFLICT OF INTEREST WITH HIS FUNCTION AS A STATE LAWYER.

The silence of Pierre-Yves MAILLARD on the violation of fundamental rights by the state lawyer, with this case of blackmail, must cause the postponement of the elections of the successor of Jacqueline de QUATTRO

Indeed, the victim of the blackmail wants to apply to succeed to Jacqueline de QUATTRO.

 

The President of the Council of State, Nuria GORRITE, is informed of the situation.

191210DE_NG

The victim shares the values of young people and Greens who fight for the quality of lifee.

If elected, the victim will defend the freedom of the press and the values of the Constitution.

 

An appeal will be filed with the Grand Council to put an end to these irregularities in the preparation of the elections

191206_24H

191210DE_NG

191021DE_NG

04.12.19 IS PIERRE-YVES MAILLARD FIGHTING FOR OR AGAINST RESPECT FOR THE LAW OF THE STRONGEST?

This is the question to be studied by Christian LEVRAT and the speakers of the assembly of the Socialist Party following the decrease of the PS in the federal elections. It is an issue that affects the integrity and credibility of party leaders!

See exhibit 191204DE_CL

Christian LEVRAT
Christian LEVRAT
President of PS
Swiss Socialist Party
Council of States Member

 

A COMMON-SENSE OBSERVATION MADE BY A SPEAKER AT THE PS ASSEMBLY HELPS TO UNDERSTAND THE SOCIALIST PARTY’S DECREASE IN FEDERAL ELECTIONS

« How many times during the campaign, people have told us: you don’t talk about the Swiss, the little ones, the weak, the pensioners, the ones who are in pain and we have to thematize this ! »

Listen to the PS speakers at the TJ at 7.30 pm :

"The diagnosis of Barbara Lanthemann"

The best example is Pierre-Yves MAILLARD who does not want to talk about the content of the recording of an interview without a protocol, which he knows exists. This recording shows the violation of the rights of the weakest by a criminal organization.

A lawyer, who is under investigation by the MPC, claims that a former socialist federal judge is a member of this criminal organization.

It is not because a socialist federal judge grossly violates party values by enriching the richest with the law of the strongest, that party leaders should not talk about the rights of the weakest violated by the law of the strongest!

 

The speakers of the PS received the copy of the record without protocol, they must now act to restore confidence in the Socialist Party.

See exhibit 191204DE_CL

191204DE_CL
27.11.19 ELECTIONS OF FEDERAL JUDGES BY ELECTED MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT

The new National Councillor Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, will check that the Federal Judges respect the guarantees of procedures by analyzing a case that concerns him directly. He will not be alone, other experts will also be able to give their opinion in order to have a fair justice for all.

Pierre-Yves MAILLARD

Pierre-Yves MAILLARD
National Councillor

THE MPC SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY HAS HIGHLIGHTED THE VIOLATION OF PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES BY THE MPC? WHAT ABOUT FEDERAL JUDGES?

Pierre-Yves MAILLARD is witness to the existence of a recording of a session without protocol. This recording shows professional blackmail. Federal judges are involved.

He received a judicial order from the MPC that prevents him from discussing the content of this recording. As a stakeholder, he can verify whether there has been a violation of guarantees procedural.

As National Councillor, he will have to elect Federal Judges. He was asked to check whether the procedural guarantees had been respected in this case in which he was involved.

See exhibit 191127DE_PM

 

Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, President of the Swiss Trade Union Association, will be able to show what it means to fight against the LAW OF THE STRONGEST, with this mission based on transparency that he promotes as VALUE

 

To be continued !

91127DE_PM
20.11.19 The Council of State reacts to the election of Jacqueline Quattro to the Federal Parliament

An investigation into the malfunctions of his staff is opened

RTS TJ 19h30 of 19.11.19

Jacqueline de QUATTRO
Jacqueline de Quattro
Councillor of Vaud State

IT IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR JACQUELINE DE QUATTRO TO MAKE ALL THE TRANSPARENCY ON THESE MALFUNCTIONS THAT ALSO INVOLVED PIERRE-YVES MAILLARD

These two Councillors of State, who were elected to the Federal Parliament, have to explain the relationship between the Council of State and the Bar Association and the Courts 

 

They must above all take remedial and corrective actions to repair the damage caused by their General Staff with judicial magistrates who are not independent of the Authorities.

Transparency is demanded from these elected officials, whose General Staff allow and help professionals of the Law to commit economic crime with impunity.

See letter 191120DE_JQ

191120DE_JQ

TJ 19h30

13.11.19 WHO DESERVES TO BE TRULY CONDEMNED ?

A question from a group of lawyers who volunteer to defend the Values of Life!

See le Temps du 18.07.19

Among them is the former chairman of the bar, Antonella Cereghetti, but there is also a black sheep. It is the lawyer of the State who destroys the Values of Life by being financed by the State!

See 191113DE_AC

Antonella Cereghetti
Antonella Cereghetti
First woman of the Canton of Vaud
Chairman of the bar

ANTONELLA CEREGHETTI CALLED TO THE RESCUE TO HAVE HIS COLLEAGUE TO REPAIR THE DAMAGE HE CREATED BY BEING PAID BY THE STATE!

Antonella Cereghetti was criticized for her Progressive Values when she was elected Vice President of the Bar

See 24 H du 21 mars 2014

She replied that :

«I think that the position of Chairman of the bar is beyond political divisions. We do not seek this position for political reasons»

Let us hope that she has remained faithful to her Values and that she will require from his colleague, Me Christian BETTEX, lawyer of the State, that he will repair the damage that he created by protecting criminals with a false denunciation !

 

It is all the more important that he was paid by the State, that is by our taxes, to give advantages to the members of his brotherhood!

See 191113DE_AC

191113DE_AC
06.11.19 CARNAGE OF 14 ELECTED AT THE ZUG PARLIAMENT EXPLAINED BY TWO LAWYERS WITH A RECORD

A copy of the record is sent to the President of the Supervisory Authority of the MPC, a survivor of the Zug Carnage Parliamente

See exhibit 191106DE_HU

Hanspeter USTER
Hanspeter USTER
Chairman of the MPC Supervisory Authority

A survivor of the Carnage of the 14 elected officials, who has all the elements to act to end the violation of fundamental rights with the law of silence exercised by the MPC

THE TWO LAWYERS DEMONSTRATE BRILLIANTLY THAT THE CARNAGE OF THE 14 ELECTED OFFICIALS IS THE WORK OF JUDGES ELECTED BY MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT

These lawyers denounce the violation of the respect of the fundamental rights of the Swiss people by members of a criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament.

One of the lawyers explains that to get elected the Federal Judges are forced to serve the members of this criminal organization that infiltrated Parliament

See exhibit 191106DE_HU

The advantages given by Philippe BAUER to his colleagues prompted one of the lawyers to break the Law of Silence on the Carnage of these 14 elected officials of the Parliament of Zug.

See exhibit 101113DE_GC

It should be noted that Philippe BAUER was invited on December 8, 2010 to attend a conference on his actions. It was finally this other lawyer, who followed the debate, who revealed the existence of this criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament.

What will Michael LAUBER do ?

See exhibit 191106DE_HU

This lawyer explains that the Federal Judges, who are elected and paid by Parliament, are forced to return the favor to the elected ones who choose them! His analysis that the Zug killing was caused by federal judges shows a major dysfunction of the judicial system.

191106DE_HU
30.10.19 A RECORD OF A NON PROTOCOLATED BLACKMAIL SESSION IS SENT TO MPC SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY

Question :

Did the MPC lie in his determinations sent to the MPC Surveillance Authority on this blackmail case to cover up organized crime?

Claude ROUILLER
Claude ROUILLER
Former President of the TF prevents the victim’s lawyer from ruling on his report with the support of Federal Judges

 

Behind the scenes, he confirmed that the dismissal with this professional blackmail was illegal!!!

FEDERAL JUDGES ELECTED BY PARLIAMENT PREVENTED THE LAWYER OF THE VICTIM OF THE BLACKMAIL SESSION FROM BEING ABLE TO REPRESENT HIS CLIENT ON A REPORT BY FORMER FEDERAL JUSTICE CLAUDE ROUILLER ON THIS CASE

Claude ROUILLER failed to mention in his report the existence of this professional blackmail!

Me Christian BETTEX, lawyer of the State, with the approval of Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, asked federal judges to prevent Me Schaller to be able to represent his client on the ROUILLER report, while Me Christian BETTEX was a private stakeholder!

191021DE_NG

The MPC was aware of this recording and his analysis made by a lawyer. The latter said that justice was infiltrated by a criminal organization.

The MPC opened an investigation to put under surveillance this lawyer who denounced the violation of fundamental rights by a criminal organization !

 

THE DETERMINATIONS OF THE MPC ADDRESSED TO THE SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY ON THIS CASE OF BLACKMAIL AND ECONOMIC BOYCOTT ORGANISED BY LAW PROFESSIONALS

Apparently the MPC is using the absence of protocol of the blackmail session to deny its existence.

191030DE_SW

The recording sent to the MPC Supervisory Authority attests to the existence of this blackmail session!

The right to be able to consult the MPC’s determinations and to be able to pronounce on them was required by the victim of the blackmail

191030DE_SW

191030DE_SW

191021DE_NG


23.10.19 WERE THE WOMEN OF THE VAUDOIS COUNCIL OF STATE DECEIVED BY PIERRE-YVES MAILLARD, CHRISTIAN BETTEX AND JACQUES RAYROUD?

Nuria GORRITE has just received her free copy of the recording of an interview, not protocoled, in the possession of Doris LEUTHARD.

Nuria GORRITE
Nuria GORRITE
President of the Council of vaud State

To discover the explanations of the letter accompanying the copy of the recording

191021DE_NG

THE WELCOME TIDAL WAVE OF WOMEN IN PARLIAMENT COULD END THE VIOLATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS WITH THE METHOD OF MICHAEL LAUBER AND THE CHARISMA OF PIERRE-YVES MAILLARD

An official document, issued by the Public Ministry of the Confederation, shows that Nuria GORRITE would not have been aware of the recording of the professional blackmail session in which Pierre-YVES MAILLARD is involved.

It seems clear that young women elected to the federal Parliament will no longer allow «Pierre-Yves MAILLARD» to use state lawyers to violate the rights of the weakest.

By discovering the actions of his predecessor, Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, thanks to the copy of this recording made public, Nuria GORRITE now knows the reasons why Pierre-Yves MAILLARD used the State Attorney to prevent Me Schaller from representing his client.

It is up to her, as President of the Council of State, to show that she does not tolerate that public funds were used by her predecessor to give advantages to the brotherhood of the state lawyer.

Like Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, she knows that blackmail to dismiss, used to economically boycott a citizen and silence him, is a weapon of war.

She knows that citizens who do not give in to blackmail will no longer be able to feed their families.

She knows that Pierre-Yves MAILLARD used a perverse and cowardly method of war to cover state crime!.

This recording allowed her to discover the true face of Pierre-Yves MAILLARD..

191021DE_NG
16.10.19 RED ALERT FOR THE ELECTION OF THE NEW PARLIAMENT :

Federal Prosecutor Jacques RAYROUD intervened to promote the election of candidates for Parliament who are ready to elect federal judges and prosecutors who are working against the benefits of the people

Jacques RAYROUD
Jacques RAYROUD
Federal Prosecutor
Staff Member of
Michael LAUBER

Jacques RAYROUD has hidden from the people the existence of an investigation and a recording which shows that he has given overriding advantages to candidates for election to parliament!

These candidates have appealed to federal judges to provide benefits to members of organized crime fraternities. They have received these benefits. If these candidates are elected, they will have to elect our future federal judges and prosecutors.

They will have to return the favor to Jacques RAYROUD and the federal judges who helped them to cover organized crime.

DUTY AND RESPONSIBILITY OF PARTY PRESIDENTS TO ELECTORS FOR CANDIDATES PRESENTED TO PARLIAMENT BY THEIR PARTY :

The Party Presidents received a copy of the recording of a meeting without protocol in the possession of Doris LEUTHARD. They know how Jacques RAYROUD gave advantages to candidates of their party by not having made public this recording and the investigation he made on it.

Watch the video showing the information broadcast by Philippe BAUER with his PLR campaign committee at the TSR on the 19.30 news of 14.10.2019 :

Video commented by Pierre NEBEL

Everyone can check that voters have not received a CD-ROM containing the recording of the meeting without protocol in the possession of Doris LEUTHARD. The video clearly shows that it is only a sandwich with ham.

Everyone can verify that it is not explained in any way that Philippe BAUER works against the people, with the help of federal judges, by allowing his brotherhood to prevent witnesses of crimes committed by law professional from testifying .

See letter addressed to the President of the Party

Letter : 191012DE_PG

He’s not the only one.

By controlling the information disseminated by Pierre-Yves MAILLARD and his PS campaign committee :

Everyone can check that Pierre-Yves Maillard did not distribute the copy of this recording in the possession of Doris LEUTHARD, whose existence he knew well.

Anyone can verify that Pierre-Yves MAILLARD has hidden from the voters that he was using the State lawyer, with the help of federal judges, to hide the existence of the content of this recording to the people.

See letter addressed to the President of the Party

Letter :191014DE_CL

The Presidents of the Parties concerned must make public the content of this recording with the actions of these candidates who will have to elect our future judges and federal prosecutors.

They must organize a public debate with them on their actions.

Logically, they should exclude from their party those candidates who betray voters.

191009DE_KK

191012DE_PG

191014DE_CL

09.10.19 A RECORDING OF A MEETING WITHOUT MINUTES SHOWS THAT A MEMBER OF MICHAEL LAUBER’S STAFF IS WORKING AGAINST THE BENEFIT OF OUR PEOPLE

Like France, Switzerland also has a Wolf in the Gate. The Swiss Wolf is not called Michael HARPON, but Jacques RAYROUD.

Michael HARPON, the Wolf in the Gate of Christophe CASTANER

Our Minister of Justice has been directly informed.

Karin Keller-Sutter
Swiss Justice Minister
Karin Keller-Sutter

Jacques RAYROUD, the Wolf in the Gate of
Karin Keller-Sutter

THE FEDERAL ELECTION CAMPAIGN FOR PARLIAMENT IS FLAWED BY A SENIOR JUDGE WORKING FOR A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION:

 

This magistrate is a member of the MPC staff. By hiding and censoring the content of this recording, he gives advantages to candidates for the federal election to Parliament who should not be elected for their hidden criminal activities.

 

According to a lawyer, the contents of this recording show the actions of a powerful criminal organization that is infiltrated at the top of the State.

Several candidates for Parliament election would work for this criminal organization.

The Presidents of the most concerned political parties are informed that there is a Wolf in the Gate

This Wolf is not called Michael HARPON, but Jacques RAYROUD.

The people have the right to know the content of this recording which shows that Jacques RAYROUD gives advantages to members of a criminal organization.

Karin Keller-Suter has received a copy of this recording.

 

See part :191009DE_KK

 

191009DE_KK
02.10.19 NOBEL PRIZE-WINNING PHYSICIST SHOWS THE NEED TO DISOBEY AUTHORITIES TO BE HEARD BY PARLIAMENT

On Friday 27 September, when the Public Security Forces declared that the demonstration was illegal, Jacques Dubochet sat in the middle of Rhodanie Avenue in Lasuanne to be heard.

See TJ 19h30,27.09.2019

Jacques Dubochet
Un Prix NOBEL
Jacques Dubochet
Nobel Prize Winning
donne l'exemple en résistant

Il n’a pas été emporté dans une brouette !

 

L’ABSENCE DE SÉPARATION DES POUVOIRS ENTRE LE PROCUREUR GÉNÉRAL DE LA CONFÉDÉRATION ET LE PARLEMENT NE PERMET PLUS AU PEUPLE DE SE FAIRE ENTENDRE PAR LE PARLEMENT

Les parlementaires commencent à réaliser qu’il y a un dysfonctionnement systémique de la justice avec l’élection du Procureur par le Parlement.

Le candidat au poste de Procureur doit charmer le lobby de la justice au Parlement pour se faire élire. Il n’hésitera pas à violer les droits du peuple si le lobby de la justice du Parlement le lui demande.

 

Il n’y a pas beaucoup de candidats qui veulent ce poste, parce qu’il est sous l’influence du lobby de la justice au Parlement.

 

Voir réélection TJ 19h30 du 25 septembre

 

Le député Christian Lüscher ne voit pas de fautes graves. Il est surtout conscient qu’il est difficile de trouver des candidats qui veulent charmer le lobby judiciaire du Parlement !

Que fait-il du respect des droits fondamentaux du peuple ?

Voir réélection TJ 19h30 du 25 septembre

Que va-t-il dire pour le comportement de Jacques RAYROUD qui donne des avantages à des candidats au Parlement complices de crimes organisés en cachant astucieusement les faits.

voir 190920DE_HU

 
25.09.19 URGENT ALERT TO THE PRESIDENT OF PARLIAMENT

The federal election campaign is badly damaged by a decision of the Deputy Attorney General of the Confederation, Jacques Rayroud, notified on 18 September

 

To read: 190923DE_MC

Marina Carobbio
Marina CAROBBIO
Swiss Parliament
President

This decision makes it possible to hide from voters that candidates for election to Parliament, accomplices of economic crime, are the subject of criminal complaints that were blocked at the MPC

The case has been referred to the supervisory Authority of the MPC

HAS MICHAEL LAUBER BEEN BETRAYED BY HIS GENERAL DEPUTY ATTORNEY, JACQUES RAYROUD, WHO GIVE BENEFITS TO CANDIDATES FOR PARLIAMENT, ACCOMPLICES TO ORGANIZED CRIME?

In its decision, notified on 18 September 2019, Jacques RAYROUD dixit(190913MP_DE) :

« In the present case, the complainant’s criticisms are not justified and have no criminal relevance that would justify the initiation of a criminal investigation »

He does not even quote the number of the criminal complaint of 25 November 2017 which showed justified reproaches with the violation of access to independent tribunals, see 171214MP_DE

Everyone can check that he knows that at the basis of this complaint, there were witnesses who filed a request for a parliamentary inquiry saying (voir : 051217DP_GC)

« we have witnessed practices that are chilling… they violate the European Convention on Human Rights to which Switzerland has acceded »

Jacques Rayroud knows moreover that at the origin of this request for parliamentary investigation, there is a false denunciation (it is criminal) that cannot be denied according to Me Christian Bettex, State Attorney ! (voir 190920DE_HU)

In short, Michael LAUBER must absolutely call these witnesses to show that he is able to enforce the Constitution in the face of these practices that make people tremble, and of this misleading and outrageous decision of September 18, taken by Jacques Rayroud, a member of his staff

Michael LAUBER must inform the voters on these facts reproached to candidates for election to Parliament, accomplices of economic crime

051217DP_GC

171214MP_DE

190913MP_DE

190923DE_MC

190920DE_HU

18.09.19 SUBMISSION OF THE FEDERAL INITIATIVE ONTHE ELECTION OF JUDGES BY LOT SIDED WITH THE DISSENTING LAWYER

Who knew that the Federal Authorities did not plan to elect and fund Federal Judges to enforce the Federal Constitution? …Who knew their election violated the separation of powers? ... Who knew they were chosen by influential people from political parties to do influence peddling?

View comments from the author of this initiative that was submitted at the end of August 2019.

Initiative comments

The President of the Vaudois Council of State, Nuria GORRITE, will have to take into account the 128,000 signatures of this initiative to explain the refusal of the Council of State to allow Me Rudolf SCHALLER to represent his client on a disputed expertise, mandated by the State.

190917DE_NG

Nuria GORRITE
Nuria GORRITE
Vaud Council of State
President

 

IN 2016, THE DISSENTING LAWYER (see comments of 26.06.19, below) EXPLAINED THAT A PROFESSOR OF LAW WHO WANTS TO BECOME A " FEDERAL JUDGE" MUST SHOW THAT HE IS PUTTING THE INTERESTS OF INITIATES, MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT, BEFORE THE RESPECT OF THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION

The submission of the federal initiative on the election of federal judges by lot confirms the violation of the separation of powers with the current method of selecting federal judges. The content of this initiative explains: "why the dissenting lawyer said that a Professor of Law, who undertakes to respect the Federal Constitution, cannot become a federal judge"".

Me Christian BETTEX, Vaud State lawyer, had announced that the Federal Court would violate the right to Me Rudolf SCHALLER to represent Dr D. Erni on the expertise made by Me Claude ROUILLER.

Me Claude ROUILLER is a former federal judge, Professor of Law, mandated by the State of Vaud to make an expertise that was challenged for its falsehood by independent law professionals.

Today, Nuria GORRITE, President of the Vaudois Council of State, must give explanations on this grime violation of the procedural guarantees by the Vaud Council of State.

190917DE_CE

 

Everyone can appreciate the scope of this initiative, which shows that federal judges cannot be trusted with such a systemic dysfunction of the judiciary.

 

It is above all for the few Federal Judges, who do not agree to have to return the favor to the Initiates of Parliament, to show that they exist by supporting this initiative.


This initiative must allow the Federal Judges, defenders of the Values of our democracy, to show that they exist and that they no longer tolerate the constraint of the corrupt elites.


Dissident lawyer raised the alert on the pressure exerted by Parliament’s Initiates on judges. 

It is now up to the Federal Judges with Integrity to show that they exist by supporting this initiative and denouncing the abuses of authority linked to the violation of the separation of powers and the constraint exercised by the Initiates of Parliament.

initiative

190917DE_NG

190917DE_CE

11.09.19 HIDDEN RECORDINGS TO THE PUBLIC REDUCE THE TIME FOR ACTION AVAILABLE TO MICHAEL LAUBER TO ENFORCE THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION

Michael LAUBER confirmed that he was the author of Berne’s investigation into the dissident lawyer. He would be the one who was interested in the recordings hidden from the public held by this lawyer, including the one heard by Doris LEUTHARD

E. MOSER, of the State judiciary Service, demands payment of fraudulent Securities without delay, only after Pierre-Yves MAILLARD has resigned from the Council of State

190904CE_DE

Pierre-Yves Maillard
Pierre-Yves MAILLARD
Swiss Trade Union Association President

ARE PIERRE-YVES MAILLARD AND MICHAEL LAUBER PLAYING A DOUBLE GAME AGAINST THE PEOPLE ?
WHY E. MOSER WAITED FOR PIERRE-YVES MAILLARD TO LEAVE THE VAUDOIS GOVERNMENT FOR CLAIMING PAYMENT WITHOUT DELAY OF FRAUDULENT SECURITIES OBTAINED WITH THE INTERVENTION OF THE OAV

Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, as President of the Vaudois Council of State, knew of the existence of these recordings hidden from the people! …. He knew that Michael LAUBER had proof that the President of the Council of State gave advantages to the members of the brotherhood of lawyers by turning a blind eye on these Securities obtained fraudulently with the intervention of the State lawyer!

To everyone to appreciate that Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, as State Councillor, cannot give advantages to the rich by hiding it from the Public, and as President of the USS publicly become the defender of the weakest by demanding wage increases.

TJ News of 6.09.2019

Pierre-Yves MAILLARD must explain himself publicly on this double game!

See Letter 190911DE_CE

 

Michael LAUBER knows that by violating the procedural guarantees, he allows E. MOSER to claim the payment of fraudulent Securities obtained with the intervention of the "OAV".

Michael LAUBER must explain himself on this investigation he is doing on this dissident lawyer who holds recordings hidden from the public and he must act without delay to avoid further damage !

See Letter 190911DE_ML

190904CE_DE

TJ 190906

190911DE_CE

190911DE_ML

04.09.19 30 DAYS ARE GIVEN TO MICHAEL LAUBER BY AN OFFICIAL TO AVOID THE CREATION OF IMMINENT DAMAGE

Christophe GUERRY, Vaudois official, grants 30 days to Michael LAUBER to break the Law of Silence and repair the damage caused with the LAUBER method

190830DE_JG

Michael LAUBER
Michael LAUBER
The Prosecutor with the method supported by those who practice Abuse of Authority

THE LAUBER METHOD IS APPRECIATED BY THOSE INVOLVED IN INFLUENCE PEDDLING. THIS METHOD MAKES IT POSSIBLE TO COVER ABUSES OF AUTHORITIES WITH THE LAW OF SILENCE. IT ALLOWS JUDGES TO ISSUE FRAUDULENT SECURITIES (flawed judgment) WITH IMPUNITY

Victims of fraud with fraudulent Securities issued by Magistrates are treated arbitrarily by the State.

C. Guerry understood the functioning of the LAUBER method. He understood that it allows corrupt elites to issue these Securities.

To avoid being responsible for imminent damage, C. Guerry gives 30 days to Michael LAUBER to break the silence and compensate the damage caused with his famous Lauber method.

 

Michael LAUBER was put on notice to break the Law of Silence.

The ball is now in his court:

190830DE_ML

190830DE_JG

190830DE_ML

28.08.19 SUPPORTING PROSECUTOR MICHAEL LAUBER IN A DECISION THAT IS NOT BIASED

190827DE_JG

An example of the hidden face of the iceberg is sent to the President of the Judicial Commission and two National Councillors

Jean-Paul Gschwind
Jean-Paul GSCHWIND
Judiciary Commission
President

TV News Summary

TJ 19h30 27.08.2019

FIFA IS ONLY THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG OF BREACH OF PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS. MICHAEL LAUBER HAS THE RIGHT AND DUTY TO EXPLAIN THE HIDDEN SIDE OF THE ICEBERG

 

It is up to everyone to take a look at one of the examples of the hidden side of the Iceberg, where Michael LAUBER and his staff do not act to advantage a party by blocking files without responding to letters

Even if they are given 10 days’ notice to respond, they don’t do it. This method is used to remove exhibits for evidence …..

……to follow.

They don’t even acknowledge receipt of files sent by the Surveillance Authority !

190408HU_DE

190804DE_SW

190807CC_DE

Thanks to the Surveillance Authority for issuing the alert !

MThanks to the members of the Judicial Commission for demanding explanations so that our institutions remain credible

Our people need to be able to trust Parliament and have a Prosecutor worthy of our Constitution

190827DE_JG
08.07.19

SUMMER BREAK

Next update August 28, 2019 on Michael LAUBER’s counterattack

Michael LAUBER

Michael LAUBER organizes the response on all fronts.

Info payante

SUMMER BREAK

FIFA IS NOT THE ONLY PROBLEM OF THE PROSECUTOR OF CONFEDERATION

 

How will Prosecutor Michael LAUBER justify the advantages he has given Me Patrick Foetish, Me Philippe BAUER, etc., by robbing their victims ?

 

IIt is also time for him to break the silence on the methods he applied in other cases than FIFA’s....

See RTS comments of Monday July 1st and Thursday 4 th, 2019

 

Coming soon on this site: Treatment of cases other than FIFA.

 
03.07.19 PARLIAMENT HIT HARD BY THE SUPRISE RETURN OF ITS SUPER SILENT BOOMERANG :  Michael LAUBER

National Councillors wonder if the Confederation needs a Federal Prosecutor.

However, the parliamentarians, who deified Michael LAUBER to get him elected, thought they had found a communicator above the fray who could impose the Law of Silence on constitutional violations by corrupt elites

Among them is the Geneva lawyer Carlo Sommaruga

See 20 Minutes Newspaper Article of June 23 rd, 2019

Carlo SOMMARUGA
Carlo SOMMARUGA
Genevan Lawyer
National Councilllor

Carlo Sommaruga has the chance to live in the Canton of Geneva, one of the only Cantons where the Prosecutor General is elected by the peoplee

 

Carlo Sommaruga knows that the independence of the General Prosecutor of Geneva allows him to investigate a Minister of Justice, like Pierre MAUDET, without having to organize hearings without protocols, even if it bothers some elected officials that a General Prosecutor plays the transparency and the respect of the Values of his voters.

While Michael LAUBER is a boomerang launched by Parliament who is coming back at him at great speed

The project of the launch of an initiative for a Law for the supervision of oaths of elected officials and magistrates by the people with curative measure would make it possible to remedy this scandal

See project : LSSEMP_19

MICHAEL LAUBER’S SUPER SILENT METHODS TO VIOLATE THE CONSTITUTION HAVE PROVOKED A TSUNAMI ON SOCIAL NETWORKS:  THE PEOPLE NO LONGER ACCEPTS THE CENSORSHIP EXERCISED BY THE SWISS AUTHORITIES ON ECONOMIC CRIME ORGANIZED BY ELECTED OFFICIALS

The Federal Prosecutor chosen and elected by Parliament appears to be a pure product of corrupt elites.

The income for Life of young politicians is described as a golden Parachute that the corrupt elites grant to the magistrates so that they can make influence peddling with impunity : This is also the last lesson given by the Minister of Justice who is Pierre MAUDET which circulates on social networks

See 20 Minutes Newspaper Article of June 27th, 2019

VSee also 20 Minutes Newspaper Article of June 29th , 2019

 

THE PEOPLE WANT TO BE ABLE TO HOLD THEIR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES AND MAGISTRATES TO ACCOUNT AND THEY WANT TO ABOLISH PRIVILEGES

Earlier this year, the editor of IROmagazine had given this key message on social networks :

"We are the ones who choose our elected representatives and we never ask them to account ! (see his message and video on youtube)

Watch also his video which shows that seniors and young people can no longer trust their elected representatives and magistrates

Birthday gift for Mrs Rosenstiel’s 95th birthday

 

More and more petitions to uphold the Constitution 

To be signed here the petition to study the abuse of authority suffered by the victims 1982 to 2019

Sign here : http://chng.it/TXzcGCJm5D

 

Law professionals begin to react

INNOCENCE PROJECT:It is Professor André KUHN and lawyer Gugliemo Palumbo who will fight against the miscarriage of justice.

See Michèle Herzog Journalist Blog

REMOVAL OF THE HEAD OF THE DYSFUNCTIONAL JUSTICE PROJECT : National Councillors, including lawyer Carlo Sommaruga, suggest a shock measure to put an end to this systemic dysfunction of the Swiss Authorities :

They wonder if Switzerland needs a Federal Prosecutor !

TO HIRE A "Maurice BAVAUD " PROJECT: This observation that “the position of Federal Prosecutor elected by Parliament is a source of justice dysfunction” supports another lawyer’ comments, the dissident lawyer. He said in 2016, that words were no longer useful and that Switzerland needed to have a Maurice BAVAUD who shot down a Federal Councillor to obtain that the Federal Authorities enforce the Values of the Constitutionn

Every citizen understands that if the Federal Prosecutor organizes hearings without protocols to investigate complaints, then one cannot know the thousands of victims, without resources, robbed by the State and its magistrates. Everyone understands that it is necessary to abolish income for Life to these magistrates

Today, National Councillors, including Carlo SOMMARUGA, have finally explained why the dissident lawyer said that “words are no longer useful” and that a strike against the Authorities is needed.

National women’s strike on June 14 th has also confirms the dissident lawyer comments !

20minutes du 23 juin 2019

20minutes du 27 juin 2019

20minutes du 29 juin 2019

message

Cadeau

blog de MH

Pétition

26.06.19 WHO IS MICHAEL LAUBER WORKING FOR ?

IS HE BERN’S STRANGER WHO ASKED A POLICE INSPECTOR TO GET HIM THE ADDRESS OF A WHISTLE-BLOWER WITHOUT WANTING TO MAKE HIMSELF KNOWN? 

In the frame of FIFA file, Thierry Clémence says that a 25-page report shows that the methods of investigation of Prosecutor Michael LAUBER violate the rules, they are not legal !

To listen to TJ 19h30 of 18.06.09

What about the other files besides FIFA ?

In 2016, a Fribourg police inspector was sent to investigate a whistle-blower, the dissident lawyer. The latter had recordings showing influence peddling involving Magistrates. This lawyer said that Switzerland needed a Maurice BAVAUD to put an end to the dysfunctions of justice

Le confédéré remarquable
"Le Confédéré remarquable"
Dissident Lawyer
Whistle-Blower

This dissident lawyer heard the hidden recording that Doris LEUTHARD heard…..

....he then spoke of the existence of a criminal organization behind this case !

Michael LAUBER may have good reasons for wanting to impose the Law of Silence to this dissident lawyer!

HOW IS IT POSSIBLE THAT IN OUR STATE OF LAW, A FRIBOURG POLICE INSPECTOR CAN BE MANDATED BY AN ILLUSTRIOUS STRANGER TO CONDUCT A SECRET INVESTIGATION INTO A WHISTLE-BLOWER, WITHOUT THE RIGHT TO COMMUNICATE THE NAME OF THE PERSON WHO MANDATED IT ?

 

WHY DIDN’T THE PRESS MENTION IT?

Does Michael LAUBER’s 25-page report on illegal investigative methods describe this process ?

Is Michael LAUBER the famous stranger of Bern who would have helped Foetisch escape justice by imposing the Law of Silence with illegal methods of investigation ?

WHEN THE REALITY EXCEEDS THE FICTION

Do these 25 pages of the report on Michael LAUBER describe the methods of illegal investigation that led the dissident lawyer to say in April 2016, quote :

« Je vous mets en garde qu’ils vont vous censurer et essayer par tous les moyens de vous anéantir. J’ai appartenu à leur milieu et vous n’avez aucune idée des moyens qu’ils peuvent utiliser »

See exhibit 161003DE_IG

SERIOUSNESS OF THE ALERT ISSUED BY THE DISSIDENT LAWYER

Following the discovery of the existence of these methods of illegal and secret investigations applied by the General Prosecutor of the Confederation, everyone is invited to reread on this site the facts revealed by the dissident Lawyer, for example:

"Read below the comments dated 31.01.18 on the methods of investigation of the prosecutor Jean Treccani which relates to a secret hearing dated 15 July 1999"

"Read also below the comment dated 24.01.18 which explained that a letter dated 18 January 1996, rejected by the Judge of Montmollin, allowed to explain the murder of Pierre PENEL »

etc.

WHO IS MICHAEL LAUBER WORKING FOR ?

If Michael LAUBER is the stranger from Bern who mandated a Fribourg police inspector, then we can understand why the dissident lawyer took enormous precautions to remain anonymous. He must consider himself in danger of death as a swiss whistle-blower !

ABOUT THE PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF THE FRIBOURG POLICE INSPECTOR?

It was proposed to the President of the Tribunal Sonia Bulliard Grosset to reveal the name of the inspector. There are e-mail exchanges in security abroad that attest its existence,... for those who would doubt its existence

But nobody knows what’s going on in Bern. It may be a secret file...and empty, based on a hearing without protocol !

See exhibit: 170919DE_TB

TJ 19h30-01

161003DE_IG

170919DE_TB

 

 

19.06.19 THE SWISS PARLIAMENT DISCREDITED BY THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR OF THE CONFEDERATION, WHOM HE ELECTED

The Federal Court agrees with litigants who no longer trust the General Prosecutor of the Confederation

To listen to TJ 19h30 of 18.06.09

Rouven_GUEISSAZ
Rouven GUEISSAZ
Journalist
RTS Bern correspondent

Journalist Rouven GUEISSAZ explains that the General Prosecutor is fully wrong both on the content and on the process

To listen to interview of R. GUEISSAZ of TJ 19h30 of 18.06.09

IT IS REMINDED THAT THE ELECTION OF MICHAEL LAUBER IN 2011 BY THE PARLIAMENT HAD BEEN STRONGLY CRITICIZED BY THE APOLITICAL ELITES OF THE PEOPLE BECAUSE IT WAS VITIATED

The Justice Commission was criticized for having chosen candidates for their qualities as communicator, while the credibility of justice depends on the Candidate’s ability to uphold the Values of the Constitution

It was above all criticized that the Justice Commission had proposed only its preferred candidate for its election by Parliament. It was a vitiated election, where parliamentarians had not had the choice of several candidates

See Denis MASMEJAN Paper
Newspaper le Temps of September 26th, 2011

 

Fortunately, the Supervisory Authority of the Federal Prosecutor’s Office sounded the alarm

 

Corrective actions to be considered

The apolitical elites want the General Prosecutor to be chosen by an independent commission of Parliament composed of apolitical elites. They want his election to be made by the people.

The project of launching an initiative for “THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES,would also limit the risks of such a scandal.

 

See project : LSSEMP_19

TJ 19h30-01

TJ 19h30-02

le Temps

LSSEMP_19

12.06.19 THE LAW OF SILENCE IMPOSED BY THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR ON HIS INVESTIGATIONS IS EXPLOITED BY A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION TO OBTAIN PAYMENT OF FRAUDULENT EXECUTORY TITLE BY BANKS

The General Manager of UBS (CEO) has been instructed to take measures to ensure the security of the assets of his clients, following that the Public Prosecutor of the Confederation causes damage to UBS clients by violating procedural guarantees

See exhibit 190612DE_SE

Sergio ERMOTTI
Sergio Ermotti
UBS CEO

Michael LAUBER is not Bradley BIRKENFELD, but Sergio ERMOTTI should immediately understand that it is unacceptable that a General Prosecutor of the Confederation does not process criminal complaints on time in order that the Prosecution Office can request  payment of fraudulent executory Title.

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION WAS FILED. THE UBS CEO HAS BEEN MADE AWARE OF THE ACTIONS OF THIS CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION WHICH REQUIRES THE PAYMENT OF EXECUTORY TITLE OBTAINED FRAUDULENTLY KNOWING THAT IT IS PROTECTED BY THE LAW OF SILENCE IMPOSED BY PROSECUTOR LAUBER ON ITS INVESTIGATIONS

It is not necessary to have done studies to know that if a General Prosecutor of the Confederation does not process on time the criminal complaint he receives, then criminal organizations have the door open to commit crimes with full impunity by using fraudulent executory TITLE.

We saw Wednesday, June 5, see below, that if Bertrand TSCHANZ receives the order to make a seizure for a executory Title obtained fraudulently, he says he is obliged to obey even if he knows that the Title is contested with a criminal complaint filed against a criminal organization.

We have seen that if the General Prosecutor of the Confederation, who received the criminal complaint, applies the Law of Silence, then the suspensive effect is masked by the Law of Silence.

 

UBS employee reactions

It’s up to everyone to discover their reaction

See Exhibit 190528SE_DE

Requirement to respect the rules of ethics and values of the Constitution

Sergio ERMOTTI has the power to enforce the Values of the Constitution. It is up to him to show that UBS refuses to use its clients' assets to finance executive Title obtained fraudulently by a criminal organization.

See exhibit 190612DE_SE

He has the proof given by the supervisory Autority of the Public Ministry of the Confederation that the General Prosecutor of the Confederation received the complaint.

See exhibit :190408CC_DE

By this evidence, he cannot ignore that Michael LAUBER violates the guarantees of proceedings as in the FIFA case by imposing the Law of Silence on the existence of this criminal complaint and its scope.

 

 

190528SE_DE

190612DE_SE

190408CC_DE

05.06.19 FIFA IS NOT THE ONLY CASE WHERE THERE ARE AGREEMENTS MADE BY THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR WITH THE SILENCE LAW

Lawyer Grégoire MANGEAT quotes another case explaining the seriousness of the breach of procedural rules: he explains how the entire balance of justice is broken if the  General Prosecutor does not respect the rules of procedures.

To listen to his interview in the TV show “Mise au point”of 19 May 2019, which starts at the minute 5

RTS Interview of 19.05.2019

Grégoire MANGEAT
Genevan Lawyer
Grégoire MANGEAT

In another case, Estavayer-le-lac Prosecution office chief, Bertrand TSCHANZ, says he is forced to violate the rights of citizens following the violation of the rules of procedure made by the General Prosecutor of Confederation.

See exhibit 190527BT_DE

WHAT HAPPENS IF THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR OF THE CONFEDERATION DECIDES TO APPLY THE LAW OF SILENCE ON THE FILING OF A CRIMINAL COMPLAINT AGAINST A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION BY VIOLATING THE RESPECT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS

Bertrand TSCHANZ explains that he does not have the power of the General Prosecutor of Confederation.

Even if he knows that a criminal organization exerts coercion on a citizen by using the prosecution office to seize with a document contested by a criminal complaint, its action depends on the behavior of the General Prosecutor of the Confederation.

In this case, Bertrand TSCHANZ knows that the General Prosecutor violates the rules of procedure by applying the law of silence on this complaint against criminal organization.

He knows that a criminal complaint gives right to a suspensive effect, but in case where the General Prosecutor does not make a protocol, the suspensive effect is masked by the law of silence.

Bertrand TSCHANZ can only explain that he is forced to make the seizure, knowing that the victims can do nothing against a General Prosecutor of Confederation who holds secret hearings rather than hearing in full transparency, and who applies the law of silence on the letters addressed to him.

Like Grégoire MANGEAT, he can only observe that the violation of the rules of procedure by the General Prosecutor of the Confederation discredits the entire Swiss justice system.

Everyone will observe that there is an inconsistency when Bertrand Tschanz says that the judgment would be dated October 4, 2018 and that it is only in May 2019 that he makes the seizure.


One may wonder if Michael LAUBER had an interview without minutes with those who ask to make the seizure!

Bertrand TSCHANZ was asked to provide answers to identify those who force him to make this seizure.

See exhibit 190521DE_BT

Everyone will observe the difficulty in obtaining the information.

See Exhibit : 190527BT_DE

To be followed soon on this page !

Interview

190527BT_DE

190521DE_BT

 

29.05.19 RE-ELECTION OF GENERAL PROSECUTOR MICHAEL LAUBER POSTPONED

The charm operation of the Prosecutor Michael LAUBER gives him the confidence of the Parliament Management Committees, with the exception of one of the National Councillor: Valérie PILLER CARRARD

To listen to the 7.30 pm TJ interview

Valérie Piller Carrard
Valérie Piller CARRARD
National Councillor
Supervisory Committee Member

WHAT MORE DOES SHE KNOW TO SAY THAT TRUST IS BROKEN?

See exhibit 190529DE_VP

The Prosecutor’s charm operation is not sufficient for the Justice supervision committee, who postpones the election

To listen to the 7.30 pm TJ interview

THE NATIONAL COUNCILLOR VALÉRIE PILLER CARRARD IS IN POSSESSION OF A "JOCKER" WHICH ALLOWS HER TO SAY THAT TRUST IS BROKEN WITH THE PROSECUTOR M. LAUBER

Here is the Jocker

In a case of crimes committed by members of lawyers' brotherhoods, the National Councillor knows that the Prosecutor LAUBER with his Operating Committee uses the pretext of establishing competences to postpone all instruction within a reasonable times

See exhibit 190529DE_VP

 

Moreover, in the context of this case of economic crime, she knows that Me François de ROUGEMONT, who ruled on a request for a parliamentary investigation concerning the dysfunctions of the justice, explained that in order to limit abuse of authority by the Prosecutors, they had to record the proceedings of the audition. This has already been done once by a magistrate :

See page 8 point D5 of exhibit 18030DE_VP

 

Trust in justice cannot be based on the charm of a General Prosecutor but on facts.

Thanks to Hanspeter USTER, President of the Supervisory Authority of the Public Ministry of the Confederation, for requesting that the General Prosecutor do not apply arbitrary justice. He is aware of the request for a parliamentary inquiry that describes the dysfunctions of the justice system with the recommendations of Mr. De ROUGEMONT.

 

The requirement for a Minutes of Proceedings, or even the recording of all court proceedings, is like the requirement to turn on the headlights when driving at night, everything must be visible to ensure credible justice!

We request from Valérie PILLER CARRARD that she informs the members of the supervisory Committee of the documents she has in hand with the conclusions of Me de ROUGEMONT

interview_1

190529DE_VP

interview_2

181105DE_VP

18030DE_VP

22.05.19 THE LAWYER PIERRE CHIFFELLE DEMANDS THE CANCELLATION OF THE VOTES ON THE RFFA FOLLOWING THE HOSTAGE TAKING OF CITIZENS BY PARLIAMENTARIANS.

The interview of one of the hostage takers, Me Philippe BAUER, by the RTS raises questions about the independence and neutrality of the RTS.

 

Pierre_CHIFFELLE
Pierre CHIFFELLE, lawyer
defender of the hostages,
and defender of the Values
of the Swiss Constitution

See interview of May 12th at the TJ of 7PM30

As Pierre CHIFFELLE explains well in the above interview, Swiss citizens were deprived of the right to vote on two distinct objects, which were independent

They were being cleverly taken as hostage by parliamentarians who wanted to force them to accept their solution, when there were other constitutional solutions

The RTS also interviews one of the hostage takers, former President of the Bar, Philippe BAUER, who uses his mandate as National Councillor and his Title of Lawyer, to influence the vote.

THE INTERVIEW BY THE RTS OF THE PLR NATIONAL COUNCILLOR, PHILIPPE BAUER, FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE BAR, WHO HAS ALREADY SHOWN THAT HIS TITLE OF LAWYER AND HIS MANDATE OF NATIONAL COUNCILLOR ALLOWED HIM TO GIVE ADVANTAGES TO THIRD PARTIES, RAISES REAL QUESTIONS ABOUT RTS NEUTRALITY.

On this website of www.swisstribune.org, it was reminded that the publicity, made by Philippe BAUER for the advantages he could give to third parties, as a former President of the Bar with his mandate of National Councillor, had shocked a High School Student, but also several journalists. See comments below dated 03.04.19.

See also the letter addressed to Philippe BAUER, to which he never answered. Exhibit: 190403DE_PB

Against all understanding, the RTS - aware of these abuses of authority made by Me Philippe BAUER - questions him about this hostage taking of citizens by parliamentarians.

Not only does Philippe BAUER not hide that he is one of the authors of this hostage-taking, but he points out, presented as a lawyer and National Councillor, that it is enough to "change the rules" to put an end to the rights of hostages to be able to decide on two independent objects so that the vote becomes legal.

It was a very good publicity of the RTS made to Philippe BAUER among citizens who are looking for a lawyer, unethical, who showed that he does not hesitate to use his title as a lawyer, his relations and his power of an elected official to violate the Constitution with full impunity.

Ethically, in any case, the RTS is clearly violating its concession with his duty to inform the public in accordance with the respect of the values of our Constitution.

His role is not to advertise for a lawyer, former President of the Bar, who shows that his role as a member of Parliament allows him to violate the rights of citizens and to give benefits to members of brotherhoods involved in organized crime as attested by the exhibit : 190403DE_PB.

It should be stressed that National Councillor Philippe BAUER could not abuse his power if the parliamentary surveillance commission were not neutralized by professionals of the law who violate the separation of powers.

This is all the more serious since all parliamentarians had received a legal notice of the Federal Office of Justice warning them about the respect of the rights of citizens to be able to speak freely on independent matters

See interview of May 12th at the TJ of 7PM30

 

Hence the importance of the project of launching an initiative for “THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES"

 

See Project: LSSEMP_19

interview

190403DE_PB

LSSEMP_19

15.05.19 PUBLIC RIGHT TO BE INFORMED ON FIFA CASE AND INVESTIGATION METHOD:

Prerequisite to be known
In 2016, a dissident lawyer explained that in order to cover organized crime, the country’s top authorities neutralized surveillance and information systems


IN THIS GIVEN CONTEXT A TELEVISION BROADCAST OF “INFRAROUGE SERIAL” SHOCKED SWISS CITIZENS BY IMPOSING THE LAW OF SILENCE TO WHISTLEBLOWERS OF SWISS SCANDALS:

In particular, whistleblowers dealing with Swiss scandals, including the FIFA case, were not allowed to speak at the TSR

Observation
Those who watched the “infrarouge” broadcast on Wednesday, May 8, were very disappointed that the presenter of the show, Alexis FAVRE, did not invite the whistleblowers, awarded in Strasbourg to show the malfunctions of the Swiss authorities, to address the public on the whistleblowers issue.

Among them were Jasmine MOTARJEMI (Nestlé case) and Rui PINTO (FIFA case)

See Michèle Herzog Blog

The explanation of this violation of the public’s right to be informed has already been given by the dissident lawyer: Swiss journalists are threatened with economic death if they do not apply the LAW OF SILENCE on these scandals

The journalists of the TSR have understood that they must exercise the law of SILENCE on state crime or else they must take the risk of having their Life destroyed by the Authorities as Julian Assange showed that this was the case for foreign journalists

See interview of Stéphanie GIBAUD on the TV broadcast of “Infrarouge”.

Thanks to Stéphanie GIBAUD for reminding in this TV broadcast that American soldiers have silenced journalists by murdering them. It is thanks to Julian ASSANGE that the documents showing these assassinations were made known to the public.

Stéphanie GIBAUDStéphanie GIBAUD
Whistleblower

Author of :
la traque des lanceurs d'alerte

METHODS OF THE SWISS AUTHORITIES TO IMPOSE THE LAW OF SILENCE ON SWISS SCANDALS INCLUDING THE USE OF A REVOLUTIONARY METHOD FOR THE FIFA CASE:

Prerequisite to be known
In 2016, the dissident lawyer explained that in Switzerland the country’s high authorities did not murder journalists to silence them. They neutralized them simply by threatening them with economic death (boycott and job loss) if they wanted to reveal state scandals. For him, whistleblowers are journalists that the state cannot censor


FOR REMINDER, THE ROLE OF JOURNALISTS IS TO WORK FOR THE GENERAL INTEREST. THE LATTER IS NOT TO ALLOW THE HIGH AUTHORITIES OF A STATE TO VIOLATE HUMAN RIGHTS BY IMPOSING THE LAW OF SILENCE ON CRIMES INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE STATE WITH ANY METHOD AT ALL !

In particular, the revolutionary new method of neutralizing surveillance and information systems used by the Swiss authorities to cover organized crime, used in the frame of the FIFA case, must be made public in detail.

Historical background
Thanks to Julian ASSANGE and Rui PINTO, who made secret documents public, the LAW OF SILENCE was broken for the public. The latter was made aware that journalists, witnesses of the violation of human rights, were silenced by being murdered. He also discovered the  FIFA scandals.

The Swiss authorities had to find a revolutionary method so that they no longer had secret documents allowing whistleblowers to break the LAW OF SILENCE

 

THIS METHOD WAS FOUND: IT IS THE SIMPLE SOLUTION

It was Michael LAUBER who found this method almost flawless:

"Just don’t take minutes of the hearings with defendants so that there are no documents to prove that the investigation is made in compliance with the Values of the Constitutionn!"

This method is simply brilliant to impose the LAW OF SILENCE. Without minutes, nothing is provable anymore, except if there were hidden recordings !

 

ABOUT THE ENTHUSIASM OF PARLIAMENT’S MANAGEMENT COMMITTEES

Michael LAUBER convinced the management committes that his method was brilliant.

He could even run for the next general Prosecutor election.

Until this method convinces also the supervisory authority of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, the election is postponed.

See the position taken by Jean-Paul GSCHWING, Chairman of the Judicial Committee of the Parliament.

 

ABOUT THE INVESTIGATION MADE BY THE SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OF THE CONFEDERATION

We remind that it is the Supervisory Authority of the MPC, which considers that it is not acceptable for a hearing not to be the subject of a minutesl.

On this website, we quote the existence of a recording, which Doris LEUTHARD heard for a hearing that was not the subject of any minutesl.

Those who heard the tape will know that this hearing was without minutes, as it was a blackmail session to dismiss, in case of refusal to keep quiet, to cover organized crime……

...Michael LAUBER, who must be familiar with the file, may have been inspired by this blackmail hearing to develop his revolutionary method to rule the law of silence, without threatening the journalists with economic death !

infrarouge

Blog de Michèle

Décision

08.05.19 TWO GENERAL PROSECUTORS PRESENT HOW THEY RESPECT THE VALUES AND THE WILL OF THOSE WHO ELECTED THEM

 

Olivier JOURNOT, General Prosecutor of the State of Geneva, elected by the people of Geneva, explains that he enforces the Federal Constitution to break the Law of Silence on the offence of trading in Influence involving magistrates.

Explanations of Prosecutor of the people

 

Michael LAUBER, General Prosecutor of the Confederation, elected by sworn members of Parliament, explains that he applies the penal code of delirious procedures put in place by Parliament, which allows the latter’s lobbies to enforce the Law of Silence on the offence of trading in Influence

Explanations of Prosecutor of the Parliament

 

 

 

Olivier JOURNOT
Olivier JOURNOT
General Prosecutor,
elected by the people,
Of Geneva State

A prosecutor with open-ended authority, who is not accountable to Parliament but to the people.

He reminds the principle of separation of political powers which gives him the power and duty to act against magistrates involved in trading in influence

To listen TJ Prosecutor interview of April 9th at 7.30 pm

THE RACE OF PROSECUTORS ELECTED BY THE PEOPLE IS DISAPPEARING. IT MUST BE PROTECTED TO SAVE DEMOCRACY AND TO RESPECT THE PRINCIPLE OF SEPARATION OF POLITICAL POWERS

The Swiss General Prosecutors have a clear and unambiguous speaking. They enforce the will of those who elected them to be hired by the State.

 

EXAMPLE OF THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR OF THE CONFEDERATION

Case of Violation of the separation of political powers with his election made by politicians

Michael LAUBER,  is a Prosecutor of Parliament, hired by sworn members of Parliament who elected him under the influence of lobbies.

When criticized for enforcing the Law of Silence in the FIFA case of trading in influence, he explains that he must respect the will of the sworn elected officials and enforce their penal code l

See article of Thursday 25 April 2019 By Boris Busslinger for "Le TEMPS

He clearly states that the code of penal procedure does not allow to respect the Values of the Constitution, quote: :

«J’entends tous les jours dire que nous n’allons pas assez vite», a répondu Michael Lauber. «Mais le Code de procédure pénale suisse est ainsi fait. Cela demande du temps.»

He simply reminds that he is the Prosecutor of Parliament. The latter has put in place a code of delirious procedures that paralyzes justice. These procedures allow the Prosecutors of Parliaments to circumvent compliance with the federal Constitution. As a reminder to:

 See the paper ofl’HEBDO of april 7th, 2016

 

EXAMPLE OF THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR OF THE STATE OF GENEVA

Case of the respect for the separation of political powers with its election by the people

Olivier JOURNOT, is a People’s Prosecutor. He was hired by the people who elected him.

When criticized for breaking the Law of SILENCE on trading in influence involving Magistrates, he reminds the principle of functioning of the political powers separation.

He reminds that he must respect the will of the people enshrined in the federal Constitution, and that a Prosecutor has the duty to investigate in depth.

He states that a prosecutor must act and must fulfill his mission if there is suspicion of a criminal offence. He reminds that a prosecutor does not play CASINO, but does his job when there is a suspicion of a criminal offence.

To listen Prosecutor interview in the TJ of 7.30 pm of April 9 th

Unfortunately, there are no longer any People’s Prosecutors in Switzerland, but only Parliament Prosecutors.

THE LAW PROJECT ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES would make it possible to force the Prosecutors elected by the Parliaments to respect the Constitution.

See Project : LSSEMP_19

PEOPLE:

PROSECUTOR
O_Journot

 

PARLIAMENT:

CODE

PROSECUTOR
M_LAUBER

01.05.19 MAGISTRATES REPUTED ABOVE ALL SUSPICION, GIVING TO UNTOUCHABLES ADVANTAGES KEPT FROM THE PUBLIC, BROUGHT ON THE CARPET :

The Swiss authorities, put in the dock with the reward offered in Strasbourg to whistle-blowers, react by no longer denying the malfunctions of justice and the dishonesty of magistrates above all suspicion  :

Mr. Hanspeter Uster, the new President of the Supervisory Authority of the Public Ministry of the Confederation (AS-MPC), condemns the advantages, hidden from the public, granted by the General Prosecutor of the Confederation, Michael LAUBER to “Untouchables”

SEE TJ de 19H30 of 25 april 2019

Hanspeter USTER
Hanspeter USTER
Lawyer
Survivor of the Killing of Zug
President of the Supervisory
 Authority of the MPC

As a reminder, Rui PINTO was rewarded the previous week in the Parliament of Strasbourg for having launched the alert on information hidden from the public concerning corruption within FIFA, etc….., and it goes on !

see L’equipe paper of Feb. 1, 2019

See Awards in the Parliament

The law of silence imposed by the Prosecutor Michael LAUBER on his secret actions is the same as the one imposed by Pierre MAUDET on his secret actions

 

Geneva citizens also react with the launch of two initiatives to fight against magistrates, reputed above all suspicion, who violate their oath of magistrates by abusing of their authority to give advantages to “untouchables” or to accept advantages from them.

See Geneva Initiatives

 

THE WHISTLE-BLOWERS, REWARDED IN THE STRASBOURG PARLIAMENT, HAVE CREATED A BREACH TO PUT AN END TO THE ADVANTAGES, KEPT FROM THE PUBLIC, OFFERED TO UNTOUCHABLES BY MAGISTRATES REPUTED ABOVE ALL SUSPICION. AFTER Pierre MAUDET, IT IS Michael LAUBER’S TURN TO EXPLAIN HIS SECRET ACTIONS:

The awards given on 16 April in Parliament of Strasbourg to whistle-blowers, including Jasmine Motarjemi (Nestlé case), Rui PINTO (FIFA case), Julian ASSANGE (case of disinformation of citizens by public authorities), reminded that it is not enough for a magistrate or an elected official to be powerful and brilliant to respect the Public’s right to information on criminal activities

These awards remind us that in Switzerland, there are also magistrates who act as “Bernard MADOFF” to deceive the public with hidden data.

These magistrates reputed above all suspicion are so brilliant and big talkers that they got a face a virgin could trust, while they are impostors who work against the general interest of citizens.

Among these big talkers who deceive our people by serving the interests of members of criminal organizations are Michael LAUBER, Fabien GASSER, Adrian URWYLER, Claude ROUILLER, Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, Pierre MAUDET, and many others. , all magistrates who were presented by the media as brilliant personalities reputed above all suspicion by their Oath.

It is up to everyone to discover on this site the hidden side of these magistrates. It is up to everyone to appreciate that they are "Bernard MADOFF" to whom the media dared not ask to justify publicly their actions taken in the dark.

Thank you to the whistle-blowers for showing the hidden face of these magistrates who would got a face of virgin could trust, while they give benefits to members of criminal organizations. After Pierre MAUDET, it is Michael LAUBER’s turn to break the silence on this law of silence that he grants to defendants by doing no protocol of the interviews.

 

Following the rewards offered to whistle-blowers on the violation of the public’s right to information, Hanspeter USTER sets an example by condemning the actions hidden from the public by Prosecutor Michael LAUBER :

After the award at the European Parliament to Rui PINTO for his warning on the data hidden from the public on FIFA, it was unbearable for the General Prosecutor of the Confederation to participate in secret meetings, without protocol, with FIFA leaders

On 25 April 2019, Hanspeter USTER, President of the Supervisory Authority of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Confederation (AS-MPC), gave a strong first sign in condemning these secret and protocol-free hearings of the General Prosecutor of the Confederation

He’s not the only one. On social media activists protest against these sworn magistrates who grant benefits to the untouchable by making their entourage use the law of silence on their actions

See blog of Michèle Herzog :

is Michael LAUBER untouchable ?:

Genevan citizen also set an example by launching two cantonal initiatives to reduce the power of high magistrates reputed above any suspicion who violates their Oath in a crass way

See Geneva Initiatives

It should be stressed that the malfunctions of the supervisory bodies stem from the absence of separation of powers. They must not depend on Parliament but on apolitical elites appointed directly by the people

Hence the importance of the project of launching an initiative for ““THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES"

See project : LSSEMP_19

TJ de 19H30

Cas FIFA

Award Rui PINTO

BLOG _MH

initiatives

LSSEMP_19

 

 

24.04.19 CENSORSHIP AND REPRISALS AGAINST DEFENDERS OF THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION BY THE “UNTOUCHABLES” IN SWITZERLAND WITH THE COMPLICITY OF T HE AUTHORITIES

After Dirk MARTY, shocked that Julian ASSANGE was arrested for revealing criminal practices, it is the Swiss authorities who find themselves in the dock with the award recognises a Swiss whistle-blower, on April 16th at a ceremony in Parliament in Strasbourg

Jasmine MORTAJEMI
JASMINE MOTARJEMI,
A Swiss expert, PhD
Whistle-blower.
awarded at a ceremony at the PARLIAMENT in Strasbourg

Julian ASSANGE, Jasmine MOTARJEMI and Rui PINTO, three whistle-blowers rewarded at Strasbourg for their fight for the Public’s Right to Information!

See Michèle Herzog’s blog

 

 

IN SWITZERLAND, Ms JASMINE MOTARJEMI SHOWED THAT SWISS JUSTICE DOESN’T HAVE THE MEANS TO ENFORCE THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTIONFACING A COMPANY LIKE NESTLÉ WHICH WOULD NOTRE RESPECT FOOD SAFETY

She showed that an executive of a company like NESTLÉ, who would do his duty as a scientific expert to alert about malfunctions within the company, will find himself censored and harassed.

The reason is simple : The Swiss Courts do not have the means to enforce the Values of the Swiss Constitution.

The Swiss Parliament has set up a well-oiled judicial system that allows elected officials and judges who do not want to honour the Constitution in their decisions, to do so with impunity.

On April 16th, during a ceremony in the Parliament of Strasbourg, three whistle-blowers were rewarded for their courage in defending the PUBLIC RIGHT TO INFORMATION.

Among these three whistleblowers is the expert Ms. Jasmine MOTARJEMI.

Every Swiss citizen is invited to listen to his speech in Strasbourg.

Click here

Everyone can thus discover how the Swiss Authorities allow the Untouchables to not respect the Values of our Constitution by grossly violating their oaths of elected officials and magistrates.

To listen to the following video with the intervention of Yasmine Motarjemi at minute 37 .

Video

To all citizens who defend the PUBLIC RIGHT TO INFORMATION , please sign the following petition for the release of Julian ASSANGE

Petition

To ensure that the Values of our Constitution are respected by our elected representatives and judges, participate in the project of launching an initiative of ““THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES"

See project : LSSEMP_19

Video

blog

LSSEMP_19

 

17.04.19 PUBLIC RIGHT TO INFORMATION ON FOREIGN CRIMINAL PRACTICES

Dick MARTY, the former General Prosecutor of Ticino interviewed by the RTS on the arrest of Julian ASSANGE, says :

« This arrest is shocking for someone who told the truth, who revealed criminal practices.»

...the RTS is asked to also talk about criminal practices in Switzerland, and not only abroad.

Dick_MARTY
Dick MARTY
Former General Prosecutor
State of Ticino

Interview by the RTS, TJ of 19h30, Thursday 11, avril 2019

IT IS NOT ONLY THE US AUTHORITIES WHO CENSOR INFORMATION ON CRIMINAL PRACTICES ENFORCED BY THE STATE. MEMBERS OF THE SWISS AUTHORITIES ARE DOING THE SAME AND THE SWISS PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION

Thanks to Dick MARTY for defending the PUBLIC RIGHT to information on the criminal practices of the US AUTHORITIES and to speak out against censorship made with the violation of human rights.

But the RTS must also ensure the PUBLIC RIGHT TO INFORMATION on criminal practices in Switzerland committed by members of criminal organizations.

It also has the duty to inform the Swiss about the censorship exercised by members of the Swiss AUTHORITIES complicit in these criminal practices in order to give benefits to members of law societies.

In particular, she must interview a Prosecutor about the criminal behaviour described by the request for a parliamentary inquiry and the Law of Silence imposed by :

  1. a national Counsellor as Me Philippe BAUER,
  2. a President of the Judicial Council as Adrian URWYLER,
  3. a former federal judge as Claude ROUILLER,
  4. a President of the Council of State as Perre-Yves MAILLARD,
  5.  etc.,

these members of the Swiss AUTHORITIES have all abused their power to give benefits to criminals.

See letter addressed to the RTS Editor

190417DE_BR

See the example of the State Councillor Pierre-Yves MAILLARD who imposes the LAW OF SILENCE by not responding to letters and by not keeping his commitmentss

190226DE_PM

Interview

190417DE_BR

051217DP_GC

190226DE_PM

10.04.19 WILL THE NEW PRESIDENT OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL BREAK THE LAW OF SILENCE?


Johannes Frölicher, the new President of the Judicial Council, has a past as a judge with a bun, photographed "in the middle of the jungle" on May 29, 2017.

See: La Liberté du 29 mai 2017

Johannes_Frölicher
Johannes Frölicher
President of the Judicial Council of Fribourg

Dr Adrian URWYLER, his predecessor, having resigned by March 1st, 2019,  Johannnes Frölicher is requested to deal with the case of abuse of authority of his Predecessor.

See : 190410DE_JF

It is reminded that Dr Adrian URWYLER repeatedly violated the respect of the Federal Constitution to cover the acts of a criminal organization with the help of several senior judges, see comments below, dated: 16.01.19

WILL JOHANNES FRÖLICHER ENFORCE THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OR ON THE CONTRARY VIOLATE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING RESPECT FOR THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD, AND RESPECT FOR ACCESS TO NEUTRAL AND INDEPENDENT COURTS ?

With the announcement of the strike of women who are unable to enforce their fundamental rights, ...

.... young people who demonstrate in order to be heard by the elite in power, who do not respect the environment, ...

...National Councillor Philippe BAUER who discredits all justice by explaining that he uses his power of politician to give advantages to his clients……..

Dr Adrian URWYLER, former President of the Judicial Council, who violated fundamental rights in a grime way, despite the intervention of the former President of the Grand Council of Fribourg, Bruno BOSCHUNG, etc, …..


we can still hope that this new atypical President, who makes tandem, photographed «in the middle of the Jungle», will enforce fundamental rights rather than the advantages, which Dr. Adrian URWLYLER has granted to members of law societies.


Johannes Frölicher would then be the first President of the Judicial Council to dare to attack the criminal organization which enjoyed the protection of Adrian URWYLER. He would be the first President to break the LAW OF SILENCE, by enforcing the fundamental rights to be heard and to access to neutral and independent tribunals...

See reminder of the contents of the letter of February 1st, 2019, left unanswered, below, exposing to Johannes Frölicher, the behaviour of his predecessor who was fully aware of the contents of the parliamentary inquiry request,051217DP_GC

It is reminded that the latter, Dr Adrian URWYLER, is complicit in a scam of several millions for having given advantages to members of law fraternities by abusing of his Authority. With full knowledge of the facts, he imposed SILENCE’s law on the violation of fundamental rights, including access to neutral and independent tribunals, to allow members of brotherhoods of lawyers to commit economic crime with impunity.

See reminder : 190410DE_JF

Courier of February 1st, 2019 : 190201DE_CM

Information to the President of the Grand Council : 190410DE_RM

051217DP_GC

La Liberté

190410DE_JF

190410DE_RM

03.04.19 AFTER Pierre MAUDET, NEW BREACH OF TRUST IN AN ELECTED MEMBER OF THE PLR.


IT IS Philippe BAUER, THE NATIONAL COUNSELLOR, WHO IS CONCERNED BY THE BREACH OF TRUST , AND EXPLANATIONS ARE REQUIRED FROM HIM :

See exhibit : 190403DE_PB

Conseiller national Philippe BAUER

November 28th, 2018
The National Counsellor PLR
Me Philippe BAUER
asking for Pierre MAUDET to resign,

Philippe BAUER is in turn caught in the turmoil of the Trading in Influence

It was a High School Student who has uncovered the proverbial cans of worms oozing in the lawyer’s rule by reacting to the advice of Nuria GORRITE to take an interest in politics. He wants explanations from Me Philippe BAUER on the decisions that can be taken by the Presidents of the Bar to violate fundamental rights

There is also a reader of Arcinfo who discovered the request for a parliamentary inquiry with the advantages granted by Philippe BAUER to members of brotherhood of lawyers which violate the fundamental rights. She wants explanations from Philippe BAUER, following the publication of the article of September 3, 2018 by Arcinfo which questions him.

See : article_du_03_09_2019

Read also:
page 24 of FOCUS droit 2018

NOVEMBER 28, 2018, Philippe BAUER ANNOUNCED TO THE RTS THAT THE PLR STEERING COMMITTEE WAS DEMANDED THE RESIGNATION OF PIERRE MAUDET FO BREACH OF TRUST.
Ecoutez Forum RTS 28.11.2018
Voir TJ 19h30 RTS 28.11.2018

TODAY, the National Councillor Philippe BAUER IS IN TURN BEING BLAMED FOR FACTS NETTLY MORE SERIOUS THAN THOSE REPROACHED TO Pierre MAUDET.

 

A dissident lawyer, criticizes him for working for a criminal organization. The following three documents show that this claim is well founded:

051217DP_GC.....181030DE_VP ....190306DE_IG

 

A High School Student wants explanations from Philippe BAUER, by reacting to the advice given, which has given to them Nuria GORRITE :

It is important that Philippe BAUER answer the High School Student’s question on the request of the parliamentary inquiry, 051217DP_GC . This question is very relevant :

see exhibit: 190403DE_PB

« What is the risk for the key witness, a member of a brotherhood of lawyers, if he does not respect the decision of the President of the BAR which forbids him to testif ? "

 

An Arcinfo reader alerts about the violation of the Values of our Constitution by Phillippe BAUER who abuses his power as National Counsellor PLR, quote :

"J’étais loin de me douter qu’il utilisait son pouvoir politique de Conseiller national PLR pour donner des avantages aux membres de confréries d’avocats. Je vous recommande d’écrire à Philippe BAUER pour qu’il s’explique publiquement sur les faits que vous décrivez. C’est son devoir de Conseiller national d’être transparent comme le veut la tête du Parti suisse PLR, après l’affaire MAUDET"

see exhibit: 190403DE_PB

The solution to end the violations of the Constitution by Me Philippe BAUER, Pierre MAUDET, and many other elected officials and magistrates is :

"THE PROJECT OF INITIATIVE OF “THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES"

See project : LSSEMP_19

...in the meantime, it is important that Philippe BAUER explain himself and that the RTS inform the citizens !

190403DE_PB
27.03.19 RESPECT FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND COMPLIANCE WITH TV CONCESSION

The RTS gives an explanation on the LAW OF SILENCE which it broke by Parliamentarians for jihadists who did not get a response from Parliament, but which it did not break for much more serious but not spectacular cases.

See below for comments dated February 13, 20199

Exhibit : 190213DE_GM

Bernard RAPPAZ, the chief editor, started to respond, and suddenly he’s not talking....….

Bernard RAPPAZ
TV Current Events and MM
Bernard RAPPAZ
Chief Editor

Bernard RAPPAZ's unfinished answer

See exhibit : 190327DE_BR

190226BR_DE

 

BERNARD RAPPAZ SUDDENLY SHUT UP,…. WHEN IT COMES TIME TO BREAK THE LAW OF SILENCE IMPOSED BY PARLIAMENT TO COVER THE ADVANTAGES GIVEN BY ME PHILIPPE BAUER TO MEMBERS OF BROTHERHOOD OF LAWYERS

We can’t see on the photo, if there is the National Councillor Philippe BAUER, or a high magistrate, who points a gun at him from behind on the head so that all of a sudden Bernard RAPPAZ stops talking.

Apparently, there are people who make decisions for it... and the RTS does not have the Freedom of Information that is expected from it

The fact remains that every citizen has the right to be informed about the actions of these elected representatives who give advantages to members of lawyers' fraternities, as did it Me Philippe BAUER.

The high school student addressed by Nuria GORRITE certainly cannot imagine that in Switzerland :

" A President of the Court, such as Bertrand SAUTEREL, can decide to say that the copyright violation did not cause damage of more than CHF 4000, while he has a judicial expertise that shows that the damage was more than 2 million.."

Nor can they know that this lie of the President of the Court was used to blackmail with dismissal to cover up a false accusation….involving Philippe Bauer, see exhibit : 190306DE_IG

They have no idea how elected officials and magistrates can violate the federal Constitution in a filthy way, see exhibit : 181030DE_VP

Women and young people, who are not jihadists, only observe that they have to protest and strike to be heard, whereas jihadists have nothing to do to be heard.....

Bernard RAPPAZ is invited to break the silence on the criminal organization for which Philippe BAUER and other elected officials and judges work.

190327DE_BR

The high school student will be even more surprised to learn that in Switzerland, a President of the Court, like Bertrand SAUTEREL, who decides to say that a damage of more than 2 million is worth only 4,000 CHF, received the «terrible punishment» to be promoted  State Judge,...
……. for having blackmail with dismissal to cover up a false accusation made by members of brotherhood of lawyers
…even more amazing, those, who promoted him as State Judge, knew about the request for a parliamentary inquiry……

051217DP_GC.....181030DE_VP ....190306DE_IG

190213DE_GM

190226BR_DE

190327DE_BR

181030DE_VP

190306DE_IG

20.03.19 A PRESIDENT OF GOVERNMENT GIVES HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS AN ADVICE TO AVOID HAVING TO ENDURE EN OUTRAGEOUS DECISION OF THE AUTHORITIES

«Get involved in politics or others will make the decisions for you.»

After being shocked by a decision of the authorities, Nuria GORRITE decided to be a politician in order to be able to make the decisions herself

See article le TEMPS 13.11.18

Nuria GORRITE
Nuria Gorrite
Vaud Council of State
President

With the Vaud government which has since today a majority of women, she is one of those who could finally break OMERTA on the outrageous decisions made by Pierre-Yves MAILLARD to cover organized crime by members of lawyers' fraternities with the help of his state collaborators

NURIA GORRITE KNOWS THAT AN ELECTED OFFICIAL CAN TAKE SHOCKING DECISIONS TO GIVE BENEFITS TO THE RICHEST, AS DID PIERRE-YVES MAILLARD WHEN HE WAS PRESIDENT OF THE STATE COUNCIL. ON THE EVE OF THE STRIKE OF WOMEN, SHE CAN TAKE A DECISION RESPECTING THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION

We remind that Pierre-Yves MAILLARD had been made aware of the false expertise made by the former Federal Socialist Judge, Claude Rouiller, to allow members of brotherhood lawyers to commit economic crime with impunity.

He knew that Judge Bertrand SAUTEREL had made the decision to say that a damage of more than 2 million by judicial expertise was only 4,000 CHF to cover organized crime.

lHe had been made aware that his collaborators intrigued on his behalf to enrich the richest by violating the rights of the weakest.

Voir 170408DE_PM

Warned to repair the damage :

See 190226DE_PM

Pierre-Yves Maillard used the formidable weapon which allows a President of the Council of State to violate fundamental rights, namely :

« the Silence law that may decide to impose a President of the Council of State who wants to cover organized crime, or to cover the outrageous decisions of his collaborators who represent him by acting without his knowledge”»

See 190318DE_NG

Today, on the eve of the strike of women who demand equality, Nuria GORRITE is at the helm of the Council of State :

She has the power to show that women make decisions which respect the federal Constitution, whose equality between citizens. This is a real societal issue as described by Nathalie FONTANET, Geneva State Counsellor.

See:TJ 19H30, March 6th :Interview of Natalie FONTANET

Expected response in the coming days !

See : 190318DE_NG

le TEMPS

190318DE_NG

190226DE_PM

170408DE_PM

13.03.19 INTERNATIONAL WOMEN’S DAY: A GREAT MOBILIZATION OF SWISS WOMAN ANNOUNCING A STRIKE TO ACHIEVE EQUALITY

The three federal counsellors, aware that the authorities are unable to enforce equality, are organising a summit meeting between women.

See : TJ 19h30, March 6, 2019

A new generation student, invited to the women’s summit meeting, asks to the seniors the following fundamental question for future constitutional respect :

"What could be changed in the Swiss system in relation to women, what could be done or not done to have a better future?"

Romane Mischler
Romane Mischler
Student
Invited at the Women's Summit Meeting

 

Answer to Romane MISCHLER :

"Equality could be respected with the law for the supervision of oaths of elected officials and magistrates by the people with curative measure."

See part 190312DE_RM

 

First benefit of this law

The first benefit of this law will be to enable the people to identify the elected and magistrates who lobby elected officials to cover up organized crime, by censoring them!

For example, in the above-mentioned letter (190312DE_RM), we quote the case of the national Councillor, Valérie Piller Carrard, who had committed to respond, see letter dated November 5, 2018 (181105DE_VP), and still not able to respond despite a reminder, see letter dated February 13, 2019 (190213DE_VP)

It is noted here that two parliamentary journalists have been called to the rescue to enforce equality under the law and to identify those who impose the “law of silence” to Valérie Piller Carrard.
See part 190306DE_PC

It is reminded that this silence serves to cover organized crime with the advantages given by Philippe BAUER to members of brotherhood of lawyers

THE GENEVA STATE COUNCILLOR NATHALIE FONTANET SAYS THAT "RESPECT OF EQUALITY" IS NOT JUST A WOMEN’S ISSUE : "IT IS A REAL SOCIETAL ISSUE"

See:TJ 19H30 of March 6, Interview of Natalie FONTANET

The inability of the authorities to enforce equality between citizens, a right guaranteed by the Swiss Constitution, led to the social conflict which is strike.

The fundamental question raised by this strike is :

“Why are the Swiss authorities unable to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution?”

190312DE_RM

THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE :

there is no independent supervisory body to ensure that Magistrates and elected officials respect their Oath

The privileges granted by the National Councillor Philippe BAUER - acting as lawyer and former President of the Bar association - to the brotherhoods of lawyers, is one of the examples that clearly shows this lack of supervisory body

See part: 190306DE_IG

 

The solution to end violations of the Constitution by the Authorities is :

"THE PROJECT OF INITIATIVE OF “THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURE"

See project : LSSEMP_19

If this law existed, women would not need to go on strike, because their equality rights and all the other rights guaranteed by the Constitution would have been respected for a long time ago!

 

FOR A BETTER FUTURE LIFE WITH THE RESPECT OF EQUALITY :

Romane Mischler and all those who want a better future, where the authorities respect the Constitution, are invited to support this initiative project !

All citizens, who are outraged by the way the National Counsellor Philippe BAUER has given advantages to the members of brotherhood lawyers, are also invited to support this initiative project.

Their support is important for the respect of equality, because this project will not leave unpunished the elected or magistrates, like Phillippe BAUER or Pierre MAUDET, who violate their Oath to respect article 35 of the federal Constitution.

They will have to help compensate the victims of their actions, which should discourage those who want to violate their Oath from doing so!

190306DE_IG

 

The real issue of the June 14 strike :

It is to break the law of silence imposed by elected officials and magistrates, which they apply in order not to respect the Values of the Constitution. The violation of the respect of equality is made with this law of silence.

The serious social conflict evidenced by this 14 June strike, with the meeting at the women’s summit and the rumour of the prestigious charitable action of Doris LEUTHARD, should encourage parliamentary journalists to reveal the content of the hidden record that Doris LEUTHARD heard.

190306DE_PC

The content of this recording would make it possible to understand for the people, the real scope of the advantages given by Philippe BAUER to the members of brotherhood of lawyers.

The people could understand how criminal organizations operates and why Philippe BAUER is protected by the law of silence

The swiss people would understand the importance that these parliamentary journalists are identifying those who prevent Valérie Piller Carrard from responding when she knows that there is a violation of equality before the lawce.

In Summary as Nathalie FONTANET dixit :

"RESPECT OF EQUALITY IS A REAL NATIONAL ISSUE

"

R.MISCHLER

N. FONTANET

190312DE_RM

LSSEMP_19

190306DE_IG

181105DE_VP

190213DE_VP

190306DE_PC

06.03.19 JUSTIFIED RUMOR OF A PRESTIGIOUS CHARITABLE ACTION OF DORIS LEUTHARD

Parliamentary journalists disappointed by Doris LEUTHARD who allegedly took a food mandate with a suspicion of conflict of interest

See rts replay 12H45 TJ March 1st

But there is a rumor, based on a hidden recording to the Press, which shows that Doris LEUTHARD wants to set an example for former judges to enforce the federal Constitution

Philippe CASTELLA
Philippe CASTELLA
Parliamentary correspondent
LA LIBERTÉ

THE ANALYSIS THAT DORIS LEUTHARD TOOK A FOOD MANDATE TO COMPLETE HIS PENSION OF FEDERAL COUNCILLOR CANNOT BE SUPPORTED BY ANALYTICAL ARGUMENT

She has no children and her pension of federal Councillor is enough for her.

On the other hand, there is a rumour that Doris LEUTHARD, a lawyer, who is in possession of a recording that shows how elected officials, like Philippe BAUER, granted benefits to members of brotherhood lawyers, made the decision to make a prestigious charitable action to set an example for former magistrates

Since her pension is enough for her and she knows that some citizens had their rights violated by magistrates and elected officials who abused of their power, she took this COOP mandate to participate in repairing the damages of victims of abuse of Authority.

She is not going to use this money to complete her pension of former federal Councillor, but she is going to set an example by putting all these COOP mandates into a private fund to repair the damage caused by corrupt elites.

See part: 190306DE_PC

This rumor based on a recording hidden to the Press can be supported by analytical argument !

 

Parliamentary journalists Philippe CASTELLA and Bernard WUTHRICH are invited to inform voters about the behaviour of elected officials who have given advantages to colleagues by violating the rights of our people as did it the National Counsellor Philippe BAUER

See part: 190306DE_IG

190306DE_PC

190306DE_IG

27.02.19 FIGHT AGAINST MAGISTRATES BETRAYING THEIR OATH AND THE CONFIDENCE OF OUR PEOPLE

The Parliament of Geneva gives the example, for the other States, by acknowledging receipt of the letters and indicating the curative measures they will take against a high magistrate who betrayed the confidence of the people

Jean ROMAIN
Jean ROMAIN
Geneva Parliament President

Letter of January 29th from Dr D. Erni to Jean ROMAIN

See part : 190129DE_GC

Appendix : LSSEMP_19

Acknowledgement of receipt of the President of Parliament with the description of the curative measures taken

See Part : 190215JR_DE

 

Thanks to Jean ROMAIN for leading by example !

WHO IS THE MOST DANGEROUS AND DISHONEST OF THESE HIGH MAGISTRATES: Pierre MAUDET (GE) or Dr Adrian URWYLER (FR) ?

It is reminded that Dr Adrian URWYLER, one of the highest magistrates of the Canton of Fribourg, President of the Judiciary Council and President of the Cantonal Tribunal, knew perfectly the content of the request for a parliamentary investigation

See part : 051217DP_GC

We know today that it was members of a secret society, a freemason lodge, who set up this judicial scam described by the request for a parliamentary investigation.

Dr Adrian URWYLER knew how Presidents of the BAR use the power of the Courts to allow members of lawyers' brotherhoods to commit crime with impunity by violating access to neutral and independent courts.

This sworn magistrate himself helped «his colleagues» to commit a damage of several million by violating access to neutral and independent courts

 

On his side, Pierre MAUDET, one of the highest Magistrates of the Canton of Geneva, President of the Council of State, is also involved in influence peddling. He also supported a secret society like the P26,

see link : abudhabi-p26-nepotisme-pierre-maudet

...but, Pierre Maudet  is not directly involved in organized crime as the one described in the request for a parliamentary investigation.

Answers with curative measures are still expected from the Judicial Council and the Fribourg Parliament, following the damage caused by the serious violation of fundamental rights by Dr Adrian URWYLER with the benefits he granted to members of lawyers associations. See parts :

190201DE_CM
190215DE_CM

190215DE_RM

Thanks to Jean ROMAIN for leading by example !

190129DE_GC

LSSEMP_19

190215JM_DE

 

051217DP_GC

190201DE_CM

190215DE_CM

190215DE_RM

20.02.19 KARIN KELLER SUTTER takes over the Truth applied for Pierre MAUDET, by journalist FATI MANSOUR, to address the issue of the return of jihadists :

WHAT DISTURBS ME IS NOT THAT YOU LIED TO ME, IT’S THAT FROM NOW ON, I WON’T BE ABLE TO BELIEVE YOU"
(Truth of Nietzsche)

See RTS TJ 19h30 Tuesday 19 feb.

No justice can restore confidence in citizens who have disrespected a population

Karin Keller-SutterKarin Keller Sutter
Minister of Justice
Federal Councillor

KARIN KELLER SUTTER explains that it is not enough that citizens, who have violated the Values of our Constitution, to claim that they will no longer violate these Values for this to be true !

Confidence is broken and they will never be credible again.

No judgement can restore confidence in citizens who do not respect the Values of the Swiss Constitution

...This Truth is also valid for people who has the responsibility of a task of state and who do not respect the Values of the Constitution !

CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF OUR SWISS LAW AND OUR JUSTICE HIGHLIGHTED BY THE INTERVIEW ON SATURDAY FEBRUARY 9TH OF CYNTHIA GANI WHO HELPED JIHADISTS TO UNDERSTAND OUR SWISS LAW

Note : Cynthia GANI’s explanations showed a critical vulnerability of our justice system that no one had mastered. These explanations are no longer available from the document published by the RTS, see site RTS,

These explanations also disappeared from the RTS-replay video of the TJ on Saturday, February 9th. Instead of the interview with Cynthia GANI, there is the message: "this video section was only available for a specified period of time".

The judiciary system vulnerability has not disappeared, even if the interview was censored :

This vulnerability is the confidence that justice cannot restore if citizens have betrayed the Values of our Constitution.

For the first time, a justice minister shows that she is aware that if a magistrate commits a denial of justice, or a state official commits a procedural violation, there will be no way to prevent them from reoffending because they are citizens who have betrayed our trust....

The real problem is that the state has not managed to dissuade them to violate the Values of the Constitution, before they do it for the first time

 

WHAT IS TRUE FOR PIERRE MAUDET AND ALSO TRUE FOR JIHADISTS IS ALSO TRUE FOR ALL MAGISTRATES WHO BETRAY OUR PEOPLE:

"JUSTICE DOES NOT ALLOW TO RESTORE CONFIDENCE IN CITIZENS WHO BETRAY THE VALUES OF OUR CONSTITUTION"

=> WE WON’T BE ABLE ANY MORE TO TRUST THEM!

Most recently, Bertrand Tschanz, a clerk at the Estavayer-le-lac Prosecution Board, who has already violated procedural guarantees on several occasions, has shown that he is beginning to do so again with more boldness :

this time he made a seizure, by announcing it only after it was made ! It is a gross breach of procedural guarantees
See part 190215DE_CM

Criminal complaint is filed against criminal organization, as these procedural violations serve to cover benefits that President of the Bar, such as Me Philippe BAUER and others, have granted to members of brotherhoods of lawyers

The case has been adressed to appropiate authorities.
See part 190215DE_RM

An efficient preventing measure against criminal organization will be :

THE PROJECT OF INITIATIVE OF “THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES”

See part : LSSEMP_19

See RTS

190215DE_CM

190215DE_RM

LSSEMP_19

13.02.19 UNBEARABLE WAITING FOR AN ANSWER FROM THE SWISS AUTHORITIES

SWISS TELEVISION HELPS JIHADISTS TO GET AN ANSWER !

See website RTS

Is it necessary to be a jihadist in order that the Swiss Television help you to get an answer from National Counsellors with the explanations of a journalist, broadcasted in a 4-minute 5-second report on the television news of 7:30 pm ?

Cynthia GANI
Cynthia GANI
Journalist helping jihadists to understand Swiss law on the television news

 

Gilles Marchand, Director of the RTS, is invited to grant the same length of time on the television news to other citizens who are in an unbearable waiting for an answer from the Parliament !

190213DE_GM

190210_RTS

180328DE_GM

 


VALÉRIE PILLER CARRARD, NATIONAL COUNSELLOR, CAN CERTIFY THAT CITIZENS WHO ARE NOT JIHADISTS ARE NOT ENTITLED TO THIS TELEVISION SERVICE

For example, during an interview in October 2018, National Counsellor Valérie Piller CARRARD, a member of Parliament’s Supervisory Committee, was made aware of the critical vulnerability in the Swiss judicial system. She knows that this vulnerability allows members of brotherhoods of lawyers, to commit crimes with full impunity by applying a right, which is not inaccessible to the people.

See part : 181030DE_VP

She is committed to provide answers to this question :

See part: 181105DE_VP

After more than three months of waiting, she could not provide any answers.

See part :190213DE_VP

Journalists contacted to put an end to this unbearable waiting for an answer, do not want to act, it is a Tabou subject. One of them mentioned the existence of a conspiracy theory that could explain this situation.

 

REQUIRED INTERVENTION BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE RTS

Gilles Marchand, Director of the RTS, is made aware that it is not necessary to be a jihadist to benefit from 4 minutes 5 seconds of television news to put an end to an unbearable waiting for an answer from Parliament.

Moreover, it is reminded that the RTS cannot discriminate against citizens who are not members of a terrorist organization :

1) on the one hand, the RTS cannot help jihadists to avoid an unbearable waiting for an answer of Parliament, because they are members of a criminal organization

2) on the other hand if the RTS helps jihadists to get answers from National Councillors, then it must also help those who are not members of a criminal organization, to get answers to put an end to their unbearable waiting for an answer of Parliamentt

190213DE_GM

He is reminded that the unbearable waiting for an answer of the Authorities is a situation that affects many citizens as shown by Michèle Herzog’s Blogs. It’s not just the jihadists who are involved.

He is also reminded of the explanations given by Me de ROUGEMONT on the Zoug killing. The latter claims that this killing could have been prevented without the unbearable waiting imposed by elected officials.

190122DE_HU

 

190213DE_GM

site RTS

180328DE_GM

181105DE_VP

181030DE_VP

190213DE_VP

Blogs

190122DE_HU

06.02.19 "WHAT DISTURBS ME IS NOT THAT YOU LIED TO ME, IT’S THAT FROM NOW ON, I WON’T BE ABLE TO BELIEVE YOU"
(Truth of Nietzsche)
.

…, by quoting this Nietzsche Truth, a journalist highlights a critical vulnerability of the Swiss democracy model with her unreliable judicial system :

There is no deterrent penalty to prevent recidivism of magistrates who betray our people by violating their oath with a strategy of lies and manipulation. They have to resign!

le Temps 13.01.2019

Fati MANSOURFati MANSOUR
Journalist
Newspaper "le TEMPS
"

 

JUSTICE PARALYZED WITH A CODE OF CRAZY PROCEDURES

Clément Bürge had made the observation in the Newspaper l’HEBDO that justice was paralyzed with crazy proceduress.

See HEBDO article on the paralysis of justice of April 7th, 2016

FATI MANSOUR SHOWS THAT JUSTICE IS ACTUALLY PARALYZED BY IMMORAL MAGISTRATES WHO CANNOT BE PUNISHED

With a quote, Fati MANSOUR has shown that there is no deterrent penalty against a magistrate who has violated his Oath with a strategy of lies and manipulation

One way to correct the situation is the initiative for the Law on the Supervision of Oaths of elected Representative and Magistrates by the People

LSSEMP_19

THE PEOPLE HAVE NO IMMEDIATE CURATIVE MEASURES TO DISMISS A MAGISTRATE WHO VIOLATES HIS OATH WITH A STRATEGY OF LIES AND MANIPULATION, WHILE THE LATTER WILL NEVER BE AGAIN CREDIBLE.

By quoting a Nietzsche Truth, Fati MANSOUR shows that the request - to have the Prosecutor recused made by Pierre MAUDET - is one more crazy procedure. This request won’t change the fact that we can’t believe him anymore, because of what he lied about.

Truth of Nietzsche : le Temps 13.01.2019

This request for recusal, motivated by the transmission to the Council of State «of elements covered by secrecy», shows that Pierre MAUDET does not want to play transparency with the people. He wants to impose again the Code of Silence rather than laying its cards on the table.

Le Temps January 16th, 2019

 

EQUALITY OF CITIZENS IN FRONT OF THE LAW

In her February 3rd blog on “Equality of citizens in front of the law”, Michèle Herzog wonders about the dysfunctions of the codes of procedure and the deterrent penalty that can be taken against Magistrates, such as Prosecutors, who do not respect the fundamental rights of citizens

She expressed surprise that the Deputies do not take corrective measures

Blog of February 3rd

It should be noted that the representatives of Geneva reacted to make the sad observation that :

The people has no immediate curative measures to dismiss a magistrate who violates his oath with a strategy of lies and manipulation,

See below the comments of Pierre VANEK and Alexandre de Senarclens dated January 30, 2019.

There is an awareness that a magistrate who violates his Oath is not trustworthy of the people

Above all, it must be observed that the Truth of Nietzsche shows that an Oath is sacred and that a person who betrays it with lies cannot occupy certain functions of state :

"The violation of an Oath by a Magistrate, like a Prosecutor, is like a bus driver who has committed not to drive with alcohol in his blood and who violates his Promise and endangers his passengers. There is nothing to judge. This driver is too dangerous in his driver position and he has to change of job"

To lay its cards on the table to end oaths violation with lies

It is time for Parliamentarians to discover the crazy procedures applied by magistrates to give benefits to members of the brotherhoods of lawyers by applying the Code of Silence. This is one of the challenges that must face the Fribourg Parliament.

181030DE_VP

190201DE_RM

190201DE_CM

LeTemps13.01

LeTemps16.01

MH_03.02

181030DE_VP

190201DE_RM

190201DE_CM

LSSEMP_19

 

 

30.01.19 VIOLATION OF OATH WITH LIES :

THE GENEVAN PARLIAMENT GIVES THE EXAMPLE BY TAKING A CORRECTIVE ACTION TO RESPECT THE PEOPLE. A VULNERABILITY OF THE LAW MAKES INEFFECTIVE THE CORRECTION ACTION

Further to that Pierre MAUDET violated his Oath by lying, the Parliament wanted to enforce the Values of the Constitution by requiring that he resigns.

On the left, Deputy Pierre VANEK called back with dignity that it is not necessary that P. MAUDET extends this vaudeville team. He has to resign further to the violation of his Oath with lies

Pierre_VANEK
Pierre VANEK
Parliament Deputy, GE

On the right, Deputy Alexandre De Senarclens, President of the PLR, explained that the Confidence is broken with the violation by Pierre MAUDET of its magistrate's Oath with lies

Alexandre De Senarclens
Alexandre de Senarclens
PLR PRESIDENT
Parliament Deputy, GE

See RTS : TJ de 19h30/28.01.2019

Pierre MAUDET's reaction: I have the power to refuse to resign and I refuse to resign while I violated my Oath with liess

See : journal le matin 25.1.2019

CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF OATHS OF THE JUDICIARY WHICH GIVES THE POWER TO MAGISTRATES, WITHOUT ETHICS, TO VIOLATE THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION :

Pierre MAUDET REFUSED TO RESIGN WHILE HE RECOGNIZED TO HAVE VIOLATED HIS OATH WITH LIES. HE SHOWED THAT THE PEOPLE HAS NO POSSIBILITY TO TAKE AN IMMEDIATE CURATIVE MEASURE TO NEUTRALIZE A MAGISTRATE WHO HAVE VIOLATED THIS OATH WITH LIES

The Parliament voted in his turn a resolution which asks to Pierre MAUDET to resign. He explained to Pierre Maudet that the confidence was broken further to the violation of his Oath with lies.

Pierre MAUDET showed that the Parliament is powerless to force an immoral Magistrate, who has violated his Oath with lies, to resign

190125_JLM


OF THE TERRIBLE AND CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF THE OATH OF OUR MAGISTRATES SHOWED WITH Pierre MAUDET’S ANSWER, WHO REFUSES TO RESPECT THE RESOLUTION OF THE PARLIAMENT

By refusing to respect the resolution of the Parliament which asks him to resign, while he confirmed having lied, Pierre Maudet shows that the people has no possibility to take an immediate curative measure, if a magistrate violates his Oath with lies.

Further, Pierre MAUDET showed that every magistrate, who violates his Oath with lies, knows that the people has no possibility to take an immediate curative measure to prevent him from continuing to make an abuse of power.

Pierre MAUDET shows, for example, that an immoral Magistrate, who would commit acts of abuse of power by violating its Oath with lies, has the power to oppress our people or citizens, without the latter have the possibility to take an immediate curative measure to end his acts of abuse of power

He shows that every immoral magistrate knows that the legislator did not plan an immediate curative measure to neutralize a magistrate who does not deserve any more the confidence of the people for having lied and violated his Oath.

 

OF THE PROJECT OF INITIATIVE OF “THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES”

See initiative project : LSSEMP_19

This bill aims at giving to the people the means to take an immediate curative measure against a Magistrate or an elected representative who violates his Oath of loyalty to the people.

Such a law would not have allowed Pierre Maudet to refuse to respect the resolution of the Parliament which asks him to resign.

It would have even avoided to the Parliament to have to waste time to vote for this resolution, because the people would have had the means to take an immediate curative measure against Pierre MAUDET for violation of his Oath with lies.

As the Parliament, who wants to respect the people, showed his powerlessness to be able to take an immediate curative measure, this bill was transmitted to him.

The violation of Oath by immoral magistrates is one of engines of the corruption in Switzerland, it's time to end it with effective measures

See part : 190129DE_GC

Thanks to the Deputies of the Parliament of Geneva, who made publicly a commitment to respect the people in front of Magistrates who violate their Oath with lies

An example to be followed by the other members of parliament who apply the Code of silence on the violations of Oath with lies by magistrates.

190125_JLM

190129DE_GC

TJ de 19h30

LSSEMP_19

23.01.19 BLOOD BATH IN PERSPECTIVE FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS: 

Hanspeter USTER, a survivor of the Zug killing, called in reinforcement to break the CODE of SILENCE

Me de Rougemont had received a mandate from the Vaud Parliament to break the CODE of SILENCE that provoked the killing of Zug to avoid another killing

He could not complete his mission following the intervention of a former President of the Federal Court, who enjoys the protection of the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office (MPC)

181030DE_VP

Hanspeter USTER , Chairman of Supervisory Authority of the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office (MPC), has been called as reinforcements to complete the mission of Me de ROUGEMONT and break forever this CODE of SILENCE

Hanspeter USTER
Hanspeter USTER
Lawyer
Survivor of the Killing of Zug President of the Supervisory Authority of the MPC

 

Me de ROUGEMONT had his mission sabotaged by Claude ROUILLER, the former President of the Federal Court.

Hanspeter USTER, who is a survivor of the killing, is the man of the situation to complete the mission of Me de Rougemont.

Two requests were sent to him.

190122DE_HU

THE ORPHANS OF THE ZUG KILLING CAN STILL HOPE THAT THE DEATH OF THEIR PARENTS WILL NOT HAVE BEEN USELESS

Me François de ROUGEMONT has been mandate to process the parliamentary investigation request,  that found the violation of fundamental rights with the relations that bind members of lawyers' brotherhoods to the Courts.

Request of Parliamentary Investigation : 051217DP_GC

In this context, Me François de ROUGEMONT explained that he was appointed after the Zug killing by Parliament to avoid a new killing.

He explained that it was the corrective measure taken by the Vaud Authorities to ensure respect for the fundamental rights

He explained how the CODE of SILENCE applied by the Zug authorities had provoked this killing of 14 elected officials

He had the mission for avoiding a new killing to break the CODE of SILENCE and he undertook to answer all questions accurately, without doublespeak.

He kept his word in this context of the processing of the request for a parliamentary investigation. He immediately confirmed that there was a violation of the fundamental rights with the interventions of the President of the bar, which allowed a managing President, member of a fraternity of lawyers, to violate copyright with full impunity

He was unable to complete his mission because he has been removed from the case.

The case was taken over by the former President of the Federal Court, Claude ROUILLER.

Claude ROUILLER simply denied the violation of fundamental rights by obscuring the facts established with Me de ROUGEMONT. He imposed the same CODE of SILENCE which had provoked Zug’s killing.

The Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office (MPC) is currently considering the case. The latter knows that Me de ROUGEMONT could not complete his mission. The MPC applies the CODE of SILENCE too.

FINDING : The Grand Council’s corrective measure to prevent further killing is not working.

 

REQUIRED INTERVENTION OF A SURVIVOR OF ZUG KILLING

The mission of Me De ROUGEMONT must be resumed and completed with more effective measures. These measures must take into account the CODE of SILENCE imposed by the former President of the Federal Court with the protections granted to him by the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office (MPC).

Hanspeter USTER, a survivor of the Zug killing, is asked to take these steps and to support the initiative project for :

"THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES"

That is the corrective action that Parliament should have put in place to avoid the killing of Zug and the sabotage of the mission of Me De Rougemont by a former President of the Federal Court.

LSSEMP_19

190122DE_HU

LSSEMP_19

 

16.01.19 Dr URWYLER against Dr URWYLER

A clash of Titans involving two of the highest judicial authorities in the Canton of Freiburg, one of them is Dr Adrian URWYLER and the other is Dr Adrian URWYLER

Adrian URWYLER

Président of the State Court
(= Dr Urwyler in red)

President of the Judicial Council
(= Dr Urwyler in green)

Dr. Adrian Urwyler resigned by March 1, 2019.

He was one of the authors of the codes of procedure that serve to paralyze the entire judicial system by allowing the Judges to violate their Oath of Magistrate with full impunity.

These codes of crazy procedures provide a means for immoral high magistrates to impose the Code of Silence on organized crime by preventing to address the substantives issues.

See HEBDO article on the paralysis of justice of April 7th, 2016

AS PRESIDENT OF THE STATE COURT, HE GIVES A FINAL DEMONSTRATION OF HOW HIS CODE OF PROCEDURE ALLOWS IMMORAL JUDGES TO ENFORCE THE CODE OF SILENCE ON THE ORGANIZED CRIME.

It will be the heavy task for Dr Urwyler (in green) to act against Dr Urwyler (in red) who paralyzed all justice....

 

Citizens from Freiburg State are seriously concerned that their taxes are being used to finance immoral high magistrates who violate their Oath to respect fundamental rights.

 

Will Dr Adrian URWYLER (in green) be able to break the Code of Silence that Dr Adrian URWYLER (in red) has imposed with his code of crazy procedures ?

 

THE SWISS CONSTITUTION GUARANTEES THE RESPECT OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS BY THE SWEARING OF MAGISTRATES

We remind that by definition :

"The Oath of an elected representative or a Magistrate is the contract by which he gives a personal undertaking to use the power that the people grant him or her to carry out his or her duty as an elected representative and magistrate in a loyal way to all citizent"

« THE IMPOSITION OF THE CODE OF SILENCE » IS THE MEANS USED BY IMMORAL MAGISTRATES TO VIOLATE AN OATH WITH FULL IMPUNITY

We remind that by definition:

"OMERTA, also known as the CODE OF SILENCE, is the Law of criminal organizations."
It is the means used by members of corrupt elites, including immoral magistrates, who abuse of their power, to give disloyal benefits to members of brotherhoods and secret societies.

 

LAST DEMONSTRATION OF THE PARALYSIS OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM MADE BY Dr ADRIAN URWYLER, PRESIDENT OF THE STATE COURT, WITH HIS CODE OF PROCEDURE WHICH ALLOWS TO IMPOSE THE OMERTA ON THE DISLOYAL ADVANTAGES GRANTED TO MEMBERS OF THE BROTHERHOODS.

Act nr 1 (November 2018): 181125DE_TC

Dr Adrian URWYLER knows that he is the subject of a criminal complaint, after having acknowledged that the code of procedure was not applicable in this context where he gave disloyal benefits to members of the brotherhoods of lawyers by abusing of his power.
All his colleagues know the situation.

Act nr 2 (December 2018): 190104DE_VS

The code of procedure which does not allow to take into account the disloyal benefits accorded By Dr Adrian URWYLER  to members of brotherhoords is, however, still applied by Virginie Sonney.

Act nr 3 (January 2019): 190104DE_TC

The situation is notified to all State Court JUDGES. The President of the State Court, Dr Adrian URWYLER, knows that he is a stakeholder and that he cannot answer in the names of all his colleagues, without violating his Oath of Magistrate.

Act nr 4 (January 2019): 190107AU_DE

Dr Adrian URWYLER violates his Oath of Magistrate by responding on behalf of his colleagues, to demonstrate that his code of procedure allows to impose the Code of Silence on the disloyal benefits he has granted to members of brotherhoods of lawyers with full impunity.

He specifies that there is the Judicial Council, which is the supervising authority for judges. He suggests that it is this Authority, whose Chairman is Dr Adrian URWYLER, which can address this substantive issue of disloyal benefits granted to members of lawyers' brotherhoods by him. He indeed acknowledged that his code of procedure is not applicable because it allows to give disloyal benefits to members of brotherhoods by violating access to neutral and independent Courts.

Act nr 5 (January): 190113DE_TC

Dr Adrian Urwyler has been notified that he has violated his Oath in an immoral manner

Act nr 6 (January):

190114DE_TC

LDr Adrian Urwyler’s colleagues are invited to pronounce on the actions of their President without violating their Oath of Magistrates.

190114DE_CM

The Judicial Council, whose President is Dr Adrian URWYLER (in green), magistrate above all suspicion, has been recourse to break the Code of Silence imposed by Dr Adrian URWYLER (in red) with the code of crazy procedures to give disloyal advantages to the brotherhoods. We remind that Dr Adrian URWYLER is one of the authors of this code of procedures.

Hebdo 7.04.16

181030DE_VP

181125DE_TC

190104DE_VS

190104DE_TC

190107AU_DE

190113DE_TC

190114DE_TC

190114DE_CM

 

 

09.01.19 IMPORTANT NEWS FOR MAGISTRATES VIOLATING THEIR OATH, WHO HAVE BEEN UNMASKED :

Dr Adrian URWYLER set an example by resigning

Dr Adrian URWYLER, President of the Tribunal and the Judicial Council of Freiburg, refused to break the Code of Silence on the violation of his Oath to respect the Fundamental Rights in order to grant benefits to members of brotherhoods of lawyers, but he resigned !

Pierre MAUDET showed that the people no longer accept sworn magistrate, who violate their Oath. Therefore, we invite all the magistrates who violate their Oath, like Virginie SONNEY, to resign !

190104DE_VS

CHALLENGE FOR Roland MESOT

Roland MESOT
Roland MESOT
President of Fribourg
Parliament for 2019

It will certainly be the greatest challenge of Roland MESOT, our new President of the PARLIAMENT, to take measures so that the sworn officials who violate their Oath can no longer use the code of Silence to cover the violation of their Oath

190107DE_RM

THE CODE OF SILENCE ON VIOLATIONS OF OATH BY SWORN MAGISTRATES WITH STRATEGIES OF LIES AND MANIPULATION BECAME PUBLIC IN 2018

Dr Adrian URWYLER leaves behind him a ravaged court system, contaminated by the establishment for several years of this culture of the violation by the magistrates of their Oath to respect the fundamental rights with strategies of lies and manipulation that he taught.

Impunity for this acts have been ensured by the code of Silence, which have magistrates the power to apply rather than to do their duty to answer legitimate basic questions. A technique of oaths violation, which Dr Adrian URWYLER also taught by giving the example in the above mentioned context.

For example, see below, dated February 7, 2018 :

« PUBLIC QUESTIONS TO THE Dr ADRIAN URWYLER, ONE OF THE AUTHORS OF THE CODES OF PROCEDURES

..questions that remained unanswered.... , and in parallel see the strategies of lies and manipulation, including the last example that was exposed to Maurice ROPRAZ, see below dated 21.11.18:

part : 181119DE_MR

After Dr Adrian URWYLER resigned, a magistrate like Virginie SONNEY has already taken over, as the following document shows it. Discover the"self-decision" process applied by Virginie Sonney to refuse to recuse herself for hiding that she is a stakeholder, see part:

190104DE_VS

=> she must also resign for violating her Oath of Respect the Fundamental Rights in order to give benefits to members of brotherhoods of lawyers 

Now that the process of violation of the Oath by using the Code of silence is known, it is essential that the members of the Fribourg Parliament, under the Presidency of Roland MESOT, take remedial actions for ending to this form of organized corruption that destroys our society

190107DE_RM

Maurice Ropraz, State Counsellor, lawyer, was also invited to take remedial actions to ensure the safety of victims of magistrates, who violate their Serment by imposing the Code of Silence:

190104DE_MR

Current Project of Initiative

The preservation of the sovereignty of our people against corrupt elites is also the challenge of every citizen

A project to launch an initiative for a law on the supervision of oaths of elected officials and magistrates by the people is in preparation

For citizens who want to be able to trust elected officials and sworn judges, it is time to act.

Members of corrupt elites must no longer be allowed to use the Code of Silence to violate their oath of magistrate or elected.

Sworn magistrates who violate their oaths must resign and be punished directly by the people

Take part in this initiative project to restore the sovereignty of our people who can no longer enforce the Values of their Constitution following the betrayal of corrupt elites

 

More information will soon be released on this site for this initiative project to stop the violation of the Values of our Constitution by corrupt elites.

Contact for the initiative project : swissaudit.one@gmail.com

181030DE_VP

190104DE_VS

190107DE_RM

190104DE_MR

 

02.01.19 NOT ON PENSION YET

Doris LEUTHARD
Doris Leuthard
Future retired woman
Former Federal Councillor

She still has to break the Code OF THE SILENCE

DORIS LEUTHARD MUST HAVE KEPT QUIET ON A RECORDING WHICH SHOWS MAGISTRATES WHO MAKE PROFESSIONAL BLACKMAIL WITH A LAW THAT DOES NOT EXIST !

For the curious, see: 181030DE_VP

She is the only person to have received this recording and to know it officially, at the exclusion of lawyers who have the full versions of it.

One of them wants to organize the intervention of a  "Maurice Bavaud" to end the violation of fundamental rights by sworn Magistrates.

She will be contacted in due time to break the law of Silence on the violation of the Values of the Constitution by elected officials and sworn magistrates who violate their duty as elected officials and magistrates.

181231DE_DL

181231DE_DL
2019 2019 GOALS

To end impunity of sworn magistrates and elected officials who use lies strategies and manipulation strategies to deceive the people :

Supervision of the Oaths of the elected officials and magistrates must be done from now on by the people.

THEME of the Year 2019 :

Supervision of the Oaths of the elected officials and Magistrates must be done by the people (launch of a initiative)

" Zero tolerance by the people for elected and sworn magistrates who use the Law of Silence to violate the Values of the Constitution"

"Let us use social networks, like are doing the yellow vests, to bring together citizens, who want that sworn elected officials and magistrate have to respect the Values of the Constitution, and cannot anymore violate their Oath in full impunity

It is to the well-being of the weakest of the members of a Country that we measure the respect of the Values of the Constitution and not with the well-being and salary of a Bank Director.

 
2019 HAPPY NEW YEAR
*******************
Thanks

 

Best Wishes to all the readers for a good Health.
************************************************************
Thank you to everyone who dared to denounce the dysfunctions of the justice in 2018, in spite of the reprisals exercised by the Authorities.

Thank you also to all those who act in the shade to fight against the dishonesty of some of our politicians and members of our Authorities!

Thank you in particular to those who allow the publication of this site !

Thank to all providers and social networks who fight against censhorship in the Media.

Sohn von Tell

 
       
<2019 ARCHIVES BEFORE 2019 ARCHIVES BEFORE 2019 NEXT