Principal Theme:

THE TALISMAN GIVEN BY THE SHAMAN MAKES DISCOVER THE SECRET OF "PIZZO-DE-PARTIS" THAT WILL FREAK OUT ALL SWISS JUSTICIABLES

A Talisman with amazing power It has shown that the prescription is not a Christian value but a satanic instrument

This Talisman was given in 2001 by the Shaman to Denis ERNI, without explanation, except that he would need it.

He knew that his fate was to lead him to have to expose state leaders who violate the Values of Life.

Today this Talisman gives a mission to the leaders of the churches and to all Christians of Switzerland :

They must prohibit the use of prescription which is one of the drivers of state corruption and organized crime.

Moreover, it is up to the people to verify that elected officials and magistrates apply the values of the Constitution in their decisions

To read : 241206DE_CM

For the details :

241206DE_XX

241205DE_IG

241022DE_IS

THE “PIZZO-DE-PARTIS” IS SECRET. IT ALLOWS TO EXPLAIN THE REASONS WHY IN 1995, FOETISCH SAID DENIS ERNI :
« IT IS USELESS TO BRING A COMPLAINT BECAUSE I AM UNTOUCHABLE WITH MY RELATIONS AT THE TOP ».
... MY ECONOMIC CRIMES WILL NEVER BE INVESTIGATED.

The “PIZZO-de-partis” is a kind of judicial currency that allows law enforcement professionals to commit economic crimes with complete impunity, being assured of obtaining prescription by destroying lives in violation of the rule of conflict of law..

The book «les INFILTRÉS & Le Serment d'Archimède» was published in May 2024. It describes how our elected officials and magistrates violate human rights by censoring journalists.

It can be found at the following link:

www.swisstribune.org/papes-suisses

Click here to download the book (free of charge)

The Book describes how federal judges violate the Values of the Constitution with elected officials. There was a case of school, it is the case A. Berset with Claude Rouiller, or A. Berset put a lot of energy to hide from the people, the acts of unimaginable misrepresentation of Claude Rouiller.

It was the censorship of the media that prevented this file from being made public, hence the title of the book :

“to be checked together with Claude ROUILLER and Alain BERSET” :

It is this Talisman that led Mr. Erni to contact the churches but also the press. There was necessarily a journalist who would explain why federal judges do not enforce the values of the Constitution.

On 21 November 2024, the "RTS TEMPS PRESENTbroadcast" showed that the Federal Court functions a bit like a party-controlled foodtruck. Federal judges must pay a PIZZO to a party in order to be elected and they must obey the party line. If they don’t, they’re not re-elected. But if they do, they’re protected by the party members. It is the censorship of the media that makes this PIZZO infallible.

Mr. Erni finally understood what this Talisman was for, because it must come from a Christian church and the Shaman defended Christian values that are those of the Constitution and prescription is an instrument of the devil that does not exist in the Values of the God of Christians.

Everyone must realize that the values of a party are not those of the constitution of a Christian democracy. As 90% of the citizens are without a party, elected representatives have an obligation to respect the Values of the Constitution instead of the "PIZZO-de-partis" Values

The right of reply was requested on 12 November from the journalist Sylvie GARCIA

Read : 241109DE_SG

It was renewed on 18 November 2024

The INFILTRATORS of the National Council have a new strategy to hide from tenants the violation of their fundamental rights. They use NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming) to hide the dysfunction of the judicial system from the people

The request for the right of reply was renewed on 18 November 2024

Read :241118DE_SG

For those who do not yet know the INFILTRATORS to read THE BOOK:

THE INFILTRATORS & The Oath of Archimedes

Click here to download the book (free version)

....you will be able to discover the functioning of INFILTRATES as explained by Me Foetisch, the greatest tenor of the Bar vaudois of the last century

This new strategy is a good example of how INFILTRATORS reverse the law. But it’s not legal.

Good news :

Even if the INFILTRATORS who became majority in the National Council and were able to censor the media, there is still a handful of irreducible Helvetes who are national Councillors who resist the INFILTRATORS as Obelix and Asterix resisted Caesar and who denounce this diabolical scheme of the INFILTRATES of the National Council
Among them is National Councillor Brenda TUOSTO
Listen to replay RTS :12h45 on Monday 4 November

There is also a lawyer, the National Councillor Christian Dandres who has exposed the strategy of INFILTRATORS, showing the illegitimacy of this vote on the code of obligations

Listen on RTS replay : Friday, November 1 at 7:30 pm

Very important fact :
These votes are illegal because the members of the Federal Council, who are sworn, can not recommend to the people, to give up their rights with the INFILTRATORS who have censored the media on May 10, 2022.

The Federal Council must reveal the reasons that led on 10 May 2022, 99 National Councillors to censor the RTS. ... It was a malfunction of the judicial system that makes this vote illegal

To be read : 241112DE_CF

To be read : 241115DE_CF

CENSORSHIP OF SWISS MEDIA

Alain Berset was recommended by Federal Councillor Ignazio Cassis as Secretary-General of the Council of Europe, even though he knew that the Swiss media were censored on the act of forfeiture of the former President of the Federal Court, Claude Rouiller, with the help of Alain BERSET

This recommendation to appoint him Secretary General of the Council of Europe was an official message of the RTS that was misleading to the Ministers of the Council of Europe, since the censored RTS, could not inform the Ministers of the abominable scandal of the ROUILLER case,

TO CHECK TOGETHER WITH ALAIN BERSET AND LA RTS

The Swiss media being censored, the Swiss Radio Télévision could not give the right of reply to the Swiss citizens witnesses of the act of forfeiture of the former President of the Federal Court protected by Alain BERSET.

They note that Alain BERSET - who did not want to enforce the fundamental human rights enshrined in the ECHR and the Swiss Constitution - should not have been elected as Secretary of the Council of Europe without the Swiss media being able to give the right of reply to citizens, who witness the violation of the Values inscribed in the ECHR by Alain BERSET..

Federal Councillor Ignazio CASSIS received a copy of the book:

LES INFILTRÉS_&_LE SERMENT D'ARCHIMÈDE

This book describes the reasons why Alain BERSET could not enforce the Values enshrined in the ECHR.

This book can be consulted at the following web link: :

www.swisstribune.org/papes-suisses

LES INFILTRES

It can be ordered at : www.thebookedition.com

To type under search the name of the author : Dennis NETIZEN

or the ISBN code : 978-2-9701-8190-3

Dennis Netizen, to whom the RTS refused the right of reply, invites Alain BERSET and Claude ROUILLER to speak with the concerned parties for checking together the contents of the book in the presence of Ignazio CASSIS and citizens who have found the violation of the Values of the ECHR

To read: letter reference :240619DE_IS

BASELINE DATA 2024

The hope of restoring the values enshrined in the Constitution by the Federal Council is theoretically possible with the new Federal Councillor BEAT JANS

Swiss Minister of Justice

Beat JANS
Federal Councillor

Takes office on
1st January 2024

To discover his challenge to restore the confidence of Swiss citizens in justice, and to put an end to the censorship of the press and the fascist state that became Switzerland.:

To read :

Press censorship/ Respect for the people,

ref: 231218DE_BJ

Your Values in the face of the press censored by 99 elected fascists

ref.: 240101DE_BJ

Note that :

Senator Philippe Bauer who was one of the leaders of the secret organization infiltrated in Parliament was not re-elected.

Members of this secret fascist organization infiltrated into Parliament are known for the year 2023

The absence of independent federal courts and judges of the Bar Association is the cause of the death of democracy

OBJECTIVES 2024

OBJECTIVE 1: To make visible in parliamentary debates the values of elected officials who censor the press.

For example, launching an initiative to make it mandatory for Parliament to have elected officials wear a bib showing whether they are defending fascist values or those enshrined in our Constitution :

Here are two models of bib that should be worn by the elected representatives of the parliament that would be clearly visible for the debates shown on the Television, so that the sovereign citizens, without party, who are the majority of the Swiss citizens (more than 90% of swiss people), can immediately identify the elected officials who betray them by censoring the Press by defending fascist Values, and those who respect them by defending the Values of the Federal Constitution :

These bibs would be reusable. They would reduce the expenses of the State due to these elected officials who cause millions of damages to our people and future generations by violating the Values enshrined in our Constitution.

OBJECTIVE 2: Support elected officials who want to respect the Values of the Constitution

For example: make visible the effects of press censorship by elected fascists, etc.

OBJECTIVE 3: Not allow 2023 Federal Council members to use the principle of collegiality to prevent Federal Councillor Beat Jans from upholding the Values enshrined in the Federal Constitution and the rights of non-privileged persons

To this end, a criminal complaint was filed against the 7 members of the Federal Council of 2023, and Federal Chancellor Walter Thurnherr so that the principle of collegiality cannot be invoked and used by fascist elected officials to violate the rights of the people and continue to censor the press

2024

HAPPY NEW YEAR

BEST WISHES TO ALL READERS OF THIS SITE

31.12.22

ASSESSMENT OF THE YEAR 2023

SWISS DEMOCRACY DID NOT SURVIVE 10 MAY 2022 TRAGEDY

The Federal Council did not enforce Article 17 of the Constitution, which prohibits censorship of the press.

He confirmed in fact the existence of a secret fascist organization infiltrated into Parliament that took control of the judiciary.

THE CONSEQUENCES ARE DRAMATIC :

=> SWITZERLAND has become a STATE with a fascist government

=> Citizens can no longer trust their elected representatives

....the 2023 federal election was unfair following press censorship

....The elections have served the members of the secret organization infiltrated in Parliament to place their members in Parliament

....a hope are the Values of Beat JANS, the new federal councillor who replaces ALAIN BERSET.

CONTRARY TO ALAIN BERSET, BEAT JANS WAS NOT BORN WITH A SILVER SPOON IN HIS MOUTH, AND HE COMMITTED TO UPHOLDING THE VALUES OF OUR CONSTITUTION FOR THE NON-PRIVILEGED.

THANKS

A very big thank you to those who make these facts public, while the Press is censored

Reminder of the tragedy of Swiss democracy on 10 May 2022

On May 10, 2022, Swiss Radio Television informed our people that 99 of the 180 elected members of Parliament had decided to violate Article 17 of the Federal Constitution which prohibits censorship of the press..

They were not allowed to do that, but they did. It was a real coup d'etat led by members of a secret organization infiltrated into Parliament !

The existence of this secret organization was revealed in 2016 by a lawyer, Me A., but no one could have imagined that more than half of the members of Parliament were part of it.

Reaction of the Press Council and journalists

Journalists, including Denis Masmejan, member of the Press Council, Claude Ansermoz, .... ,have protested in vain against this restriction of press freedom..

Journalists have noted that Switzerland has become a state with a fascist government. They did not understand this measure which was meaningless, especially since Parliament could not justify it

Facts hidden from journalists by the Federal Council and elected officials

It is a request for the right of reply that concerned the activities of Ruedi Montanari (former Deputy Attorney General of the Confederation to Michael Lauber) which is at the origin of the censorship of the press by the members of this secret organization infiltrated in Parliament.

Positive points for defenders of the Values enshrined in the Swiss Constitution and international conventions :

The existence of members of this secret fascist organization infiltrated into Parliament was revealed by this illicit decision of its infiltrated members in Parliament to censor press freedom.

The names of the members of Parliament who censored the press are known. The people have the right to know them.

The names of the 81 elected officials who defend freedom of the press and who refused to censor the press are also known. They are allies of Swiss citizens who want to respect the Values of the Constitution.

An initiative could be launched to force parliament to make visible the fascist elected officials who betray the values enshrined in the Constitution and those who respect these values.

A simple way would be to ask that our elected officials wear a bib in parliament that shows whether they defend the values of democracy or those of the fascist state

(During election campaigns, the press should have the obligation to interview candidates on their commitment to uphold the Values enshrined in the Constitution, including the ban on media censorship).

Surprised, Senator Philippe BAUER, whose seat in the Council of States was assured according to the Press, did not expect to lose the federal elections with the unconditional support of the President of the Federal Court, Christian Herrmann, and the Attorney General of the Canton of Fribourg, Fabien GASSER.

An infiltrator of Parliament

Senator Philippe Bauer expelled from Parliament by citizens who want respect for the values of the Constitution and those expressed in the ECHR and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948 of the UNO.

His only thorn in his side was the revelation in 2016, by one of his fellow lawyers, that he was a member of a criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament, called «the infiltrators of Parliament».

The members of this criminal organization used federal elections to place their members in the Federal Assembly!

Their modus operandi is to deny the reality by applying procedures that do not allow to take into account the interventions of the Bâtonniers. They do so thanks of federal judges who do not enforce the  law conflict rule.

To discover how the Attorney General Fabien GASSER denies the reality and reverses the right to allow the criminal organization of the infiltrators of Parliament to violate the Values of the ECHR: :

Example 1 : 231017DE_FG

Example 2 : 231018DE_FG

Reminder of some facts

In 1995, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA, here called «Foetisch» committed economic crimes (millions of damages). He justifies them by saying that he has the assurance that they will never be investigated thanks his relations in high places. He specifies that he has the power to ruin his victims to make unnecessary procedure if they ask for compensation for the damage.

EIn 2005, an elite of citizens discovered that the Bâtonnier Philippe RICHARD prohibited that Foetisch could be the subject of a criminal complaint, because he is a member of the Order of Lawyers. It is this procedure set up by the infiltrators of Parliament that assures Foetisch that his economic crimes will never be investigated.

This elite discovers that in order to ruin his victims to make useless procedure, Foetisch uses the slanderous denunciation. He uses in particular the intervention of the Bâtonnier BETTEX to prevent witnesses from testifying.

To read the Inquiry : 051217DP_GC

EIn 2007, the Court is requested to confirm that the intervention of the Bâtonnier BETTEX, which prohibits a witness to testify is an attack on the personality of Dr ERNI, because the latter could not deny the slanderous denunciation. It is the consequence of the unique witness of the slanderous denunciation who could not testify, when he wanted to testify.

Masterfully, Philippe BAUER explains that it was enough for Foetisch not to answer the convocations of the Bâtonnier RICHARD to be assured that his economic crimes will never be investigated. This was a lower right that was put in place by the infiltrators of Parliament

Me Schaller will then convince the Neuchâtel judges that the prohibition made by the Bâtonnier BETTEX to the unique witness of the slanderous denunciation to be able to testify is an attack on the personality of Dr ERNI.

In 2009, Neuchâtel judges, who respect the Values of the ECHR, confirmed the unlawful violation of personality.

Me Philippe BAUER will then ask the Federal Court to overturn this judgment with the argument that the witness must disobey the Bâtonnier and suffer the damage. If he didn’t disobey the bar President, his client has to bear the millions of damages.

The Judge Christian HERRMANN who is not independent of the Bar Association will agree in 2010 to this Senator who was well known in Parliament. He again intervened in July 2023 to hide the damage caused by this infiltrator of Parliament that was Senator Philippe BAUER

In 2016, a lawyer reveals the existence of this criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament, they are called “the infiltrators of Parliament”. By 2022, their members had taken steps to reduce the power of the press, which dared not speak of the existence of this criminal organization.

On 3 May 2023, Federal Councillor Ignazio Cassis, who knows what the infiltrators are doing, pledged to no longer violate the ECHR.

The hunt for infiltrators of Parliament was opened with these federal elections. A negotiation/ mediation must allow to restore the freedom of the Press and have the damage repaired by the members of this criminal organizatione.

We know that a small majority of Parliament could potentially be members of the infiltrators. There is work to achieve to obtain the respect of the ECHR Values by Members of Parliament by expelling members of this criminal organization from Parliament.

The new Attorney General of the Confederation is aware. He was asked to ensure that participants in the negotiation/mediation will not be subject to censorship or threats.

To read : 231023DE_SB

Members of a criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament, to which Senator Philippe BAUER belongs, have continually violated the Values of the Swiss Constitution and those of the ECHR to elect several of their members to Parliament.

They are doing it again for the October 2023 election!

To know that Senator PLR Me PHILIPPE BAUER, former Bar President is again PLR candidate to the Council of States.....

Me Philippe BAUER

.....while he was formally identified as a member of a criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament that violates the Values of International Conventions, as it can be attested by an elite of citizens respectful of the Values of the ECHR who participated in the MBA-HEC Conference, reference 101208HEC.

The conference included the content of the request for a parliamentary inquiry :

reference 051217DP_GC

...which describes the crimes committed by the confreres to Me Philippe Bauer with the interventions of the Bâtonniers,

... as well as the intervention of Philippe BAUER in the trial against the Order of Lawyers which was represented by Me Philippe BAUER

reference 090203CC_DE

Voters' right to know before the October 2023 Federal Assembly members elections

The Federal Council has continuously violated Articles 6, 13 and 14 of the ECHR combined with each other by not requiring Parliament to provide access to independent federal courts and judges.

The parliamentary supervisory authorities imposed the law of silence on this crass violation of the Values of the Constitution and the ECHR, by the advocate and lawyers of the Parliament

In 2005, the elite of citizens who filed the request for a parliamentary inquiry noted the violation of the ECHR Values with the relations that bind judges to brotherhoods of lawyers.

It notes that the Values of the ECHR are violated by magistrates who violate the rule of conflict of law with practices that are quivering. In 2006, a mediator appointed by the State confirmed the violation of the rule of conflict of law by the federal authorities who do not give access to independent federal judges.

The conflict of law rule states :

In the event of a conflict of law between a lower right and a higher right, the higher right must always dominate.

(The reason is that lower rights, or enforcement rights, are set up by elected members of parliament to enforce higher law.)

Words that no longer serve to enforce the ECHR

In 2016, a lawyer who read the file of the request for parliamentary investigation with the interventions of the former Bar President Philippe BAUER said that: the words were no longer useful to obtain that the Federal Authorities enforce the Values of the ECHR.

He said that he had no other solutions to propose than to have a Federal Councillor shot down so that the Federal Council would enforce the values of the ECHR. He stated that Me Foetisch was a senior member of a criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament and that Me Philippe BAUER was a member of this criminal organization.

IlHe asked Dr. Erni the following question that was shared with Alain Berset in 2018 with the submissions of this lawyer :

«If as an engineer you had to build a system that allows an elite to violate the rights of other citizens with impunity, how would you do it?”

This question remained unanswered and was mentioned again in 2021 in an interview with Commissioner Lorenzo Righini mandated by Alain BERSET to deal with this file on crimes committed with the violation of the rule of conflict of law.

The answer was given on May 19, 2022 by Me TA

This member of the Bar Association revealed that the request for parliamentary investigation described crimes committed with the violation of the prohibition of conflict of interest with the Interventions des Bâtonniers. Me Philippe Bauer knew this and the law he applied to overturn the judgment of Neuchâtel does not exist.

Since May 19, 2022, Dr. Erni has said he can respond to Alain BERSET, in practice he would do what members of the criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament do :

"namely that they put in place procedures that allow the rule of conflict of law to be violated in order to promote the election of their members to Parliament."

To prevent the federal election from being vitiated, Dr ERNI asked by registered mail to the Federal Council to postpone them, stating, quote:

"THE RIGHT TO KNOW OF SWISS VOTERS BEFORE FEDERAL ELECTIONS "

To read: 231012DE_AB

with 231010DE_CE

with remedies indication fot citizen

To read : 231013DE_AB

Senator Philippe BAUER, a candidate for the federal elections, no longer has the right to hide from voters that he is the subject of a criminal complaint for discrimination of citizens and violation of the Values of the Constitution with his relations with federal judges.

Voters should know that Me Philippe BAUER works for a criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament that places its members in Parliament during federal elections to put in place codes of procedures that serve to violate the Values of the Constitution

Concrete commitment of the Federal Council of 3 May 2023 in New York

Federal Councillor, Ignazio CASSIS, on behalf of the Federal Council, has committed himself to no longer violate international Conventions, by making speak together the opposite parties to enforce human rights respect

lHe does so 18 years after an elite of citizens had declared themselves witnesses to the violation of the ECHR!... and that they complained that they could not obtain respect for the ECHR Values with the Press which was censored

To read : 051217DP_GC

On 3 May 2023, Federal Councillor Ignazio Cassis acknowledged that the Federal Authorities had consistently violated the Values of international conventions until that date.

They did so with magistrates who violated the rule of law conflict.

To be read : 230926DE_CF

See also : 231002DE_AF

Change on May 3, 2023

Since 3 May 2023, the Federal Council has been committed to upholding the human rights guaranteed by international conventions, including the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UN) and the Values of the European Convention on Human Rights..

The Federal Council is committed to doing this by making those who violate human rights speak with those who observe the violation of the Values of international conventions.

The Federal Council must organize a mediation/ confrontation between Me Philippe BAUER and the members of brotherhoods of lawyers who are elected to Parliament to set up codes of procedure that violate the Values of the Constitution and those of the Conventions international,…., and the citizen who are witness of the Constitution value violation with the rule of Law conflict by Me Philippe BAUER.

It must do so before the federal elections so that voters know the candidates who commit to uphold the Values of the Swiss Constitution and international conventions.

Those who do not want to finance elected officials who work against the Values of our people, have the right to be informed of how Me Philippe BAUER, with the members of this criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament, establish codes of procedure to violate the Values of the Constitution.

Press must no longer be censored for these crimes committed by legal professionals, who had the assurance that there crimes would never be investigated  through the relations that bind the members of their brotherhood to federal judges.

Further information

A request for mediation was made to the Federal Council to settle the damage caused by these professionals of the law with the violation of the rule of conflict of law

There is no shortage of witnesses to confirm the violation of the ECHR, even the President of the Grand Council of Fribourg, Bruno BOSCHUNG -who knew the request for parliamentary investigation - has confirmed that the ECHR Values were violated

To read : 230907DE_BB

....... to observe that the compensation of the damage will not put an end to the actions of this criminal organization which sets up codes of procedure for electing his members to the parliament in order to set up codes of procedure which serve to violate the rule of law conflict.

ALAIN BERSET DOES NOT WANT TO BE COMPARED TO BAILLI GESSLER. HE NO LONGER MAKES OVATION HIS HAT KNOWN WORLDWIDE BY THE PRESS FOR HAVING CONTINUOUSLY VIOLATED THE VALUES OF THE ECHR BEFORE MAY 3, 2023, AS REVEALED IGNAZIO CASSIS

He made the school trip of the Federal Council in the presence of IGNAZIO CASSIS - who wants the respect of the ECHR Values by the Federal Council - holding discreetly his famous hat in hand

To read : 230627DE_AB

Alain BERSET still has time to act to enforce the ECHR Values

THE MEA CULPA OF FEDERAL COUNCILLOR IGNAZIO CASSIS FOR THE GROSS AND CONTINUOUS VIOLATION OF THE ECHR BY THE FEDERAL COUNCIL BEFORE 3 MAY 2023, WITH ITS COMMITMENT TO UPHOLD THE VALUES OF THE ECHR SINCE MAY 3, 2023,…, MADE THE PRESIDENT OF THE CONFEDERATION ALAIN BERSET REACT,

THE NAME OF ALAIN BERSET MAY NOT BE ASSOCIATED WITH THAT OF HERMANN GESSLER FOR HAVING COME TO BE KNOWN FOR THE GLORY OF HIS HAT, BUT FOR HAVING PUT AN END TO THE VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE WITH THE VIOLATION OF THE RULE OF CONFLICT OF LAW BY THE SUPERVISORY AUTHORITIESE

To read :

EXHIBIT: 230621DED_IG

Having to chair the Security Council of Europe, Federal Councillor Ignazio Cassis considers that a call for peace is possible if the Federal Council no longer violates the ECHR. He gave the following message to the Press :

PACTA SUNT SERVANDA.

He observed that RUSSIA violated international law and international conventions, including the UN Charter, but he did not cheat with other countries that also violate international conventions, including Switzerland:

IGNAZIO CASSIS PRESIDING THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL

For the first time, with full knowledge of the facts, Ignazio CASSIS no longer hides that the Federal Council violates international conventions,

and he opposes the violation of international conventions, including the ECHR, which he himself violated in a crass way in 2022,.... preventing people from talking to each other.

To read :230503_RTS

Like all members of the Federal Council, Ignazio CASSIS prevented people from speaking to each other with practices that made them shudder: he did not even recognize their right to be represented by a lawyer to be heard.

He knew that the Federal Council was violating its oath to respect the European Convention on Human Rights by not providing access to independent federal judges. Above all, he knew that these Swiss federal judges violated the ECHR by depriving citizens of the right to be defended by their lawyer.

It all started in 2005, when an elite of citizens found the violation of the ECHR by the Federal Authorities and filed a request for a parliamentary inquiry

To read : 051217DP_GC

This elite of citizens had been prevented from being heard by the Supervisory Authorities, while the violation of the ECHR had been noted and confirmed by lawyers.

IGNAZIO CASSIS knew that the case had been brought before the European Council and that his attitude was disapproved in Brussels

To read : 220117DE_IC

Like Alain BERSET, Ignazio Cassis also knew that a lawyer said like Philippe REVAZ that the situation was desperate like the one with PUTIN. This lawyer wanted to bring down a Federal Councillor, following the violation of the European Convention on Human Rights by the Federal Council. This was in January 2022.

This lawyer had revealed that the request for a parliamentary inquiry described crimes committed with a right that does not exist, which is applied by members of a criminal organization infiltrated in the state

To read : 220117DE_AB

THE CHANGE ON MAY 19, 2022

On May 19, 2022, a lawyer revealed the great secret of elected officials, namely that the request for a parliamentary inquiry described crimes committed with the violation of the prohibition of conflict of interest with the interventions of the Bâtonniers. This right was used to violate the ECHR and all judge lawyers, whose federal judges, knew him.

To violate the ECHR the federal judges, in cases of conflict of law, make the lower rights dominant over the constitutional law, while they knew they had to make dominant the constitutional law, that means the contrary..

With the principle of collegiality, Ignazio cassis was aware of the situation. He knew that the new Minister of Justice wants the security of the law, and that citizens can no longer trust the Federal Council if its members do not enforce the ECHR:

To read : DE_230411DE_EB

We can only welcome the commitment that Ignazio Cassis made for the Federal Council to enforce the ECHR. This is all the more so since the new Attorney General of the Confederation, Stefan Blättler said he could not manage these crimes committed with the interventions of the Bâtonniers and that he forwarded the file to the supervisory authorities

To read : 230509DE_AF and 230509DE_CS

Welcome to Elisabeth Baume-Schneider who wants to defend the ECHR Values for those who are not entitled to speak.

Federal Councillor
Minister of Justice
Elisabeth Baume-Schneider

The press has called her the Minister of the Justice for Children, because she is committed to the respect of the Values of the Constitution and those of the ECHR for the majority of Swiss who, like the children, do not manage to be heard by the elected.

4th April, interview by RTS

Her first Challenge to ensure respect for the ECHR’s Values is in line with her VALUES :

The General Prosecutor of Confederation said that he could not manage the case of crimes committed with the interventions of the Bâtonniers in view of the behaviour of his assistants and of Dr Roy GARRÉ, President of the Federal Criminal Court. He referred the matter to the Supervisory Authority.

By referring the matter to the Supervisory Authority, the new General Prosecutor of the Confederation, Stefan Blättler, highlights a systemic dysfunction of the judicial system, which cannot enforce the values of the ECHR.

Our new Minister of Justice knows one reason : it is that judges and elected officials do not enforce section 35 of the Constitution in their decisions, but on the contrary,

in the event of a conflict of law:

they violate in a crass way the rule of management of conflicts of law, by reversing the rule of conflict of Law:

For examples :

They make dominate the lower rights - as for example the interventions of the Bâtonniers - over the higher rights which are notably constitutional law and human rights protected by the ECHR

...with the protection of federal judges

to read : 230411DE_EB

Fact 1:

On 19 December 2022, within the legal deadline, Dr. Erni received a letter from the President of the Federal Criminal Court, Dr. Roy GARRÉ, giving him the deadline of 16 December 2022, already outdated, to answer him on a fundamental question in an appeal that concerns the disrespect by the Authorities of the rule of management of the conflict of law, which states that :

« In the event of a conflict of law, it is the higher law that must prevail »

(It was stated for this appeal that if the deadline of 16 December was not met, whereas the letter of reply had not been received until 19 December, the appeal would be deemed inadmissible)

Criminal complaint was filed against Dr Roy GARRÉ for this wrongful act. It was addressed to General Prosecutor Stefan Blättler in a personal and strictly confidential manner, as his deputies were affected by a complaint against criminal organization that relates to the same facts, crimes committed with the violation of the conflict of interest prohibition.

Fact 2 :

The Deputy General Prosecutor of the Confederation, Jacques RAYROUD, then issued an order of not jurisdiction in matter to hide this act of wrongfulness of the President of the Federal Criminal Court. This second act of defamation was addressed in confidence to Dr ROY GARRÉ so that his name would not be revealed to the people and to those who elected him. No one could know the process used by Dr. Roy Garré to dismiss the appeal, nor could anyone know that he was the President of the Federal Criminal Court.

The parliament only knew that Jacques Rayroud’s order was addressed to a high magistrate named Dr X, under confidential cover!

To read exhibit :230307DE_MC

Fact 3 :

The new General Prosecutor of the Confederation, Stefan Blättler, said he could not manage this case. He could not talk about it since Dr Erni had forwarded the criminal complaint against the President of the Federal Criminal Court to him in a personal and strictly confidential manner. In order to ensure respect for the rights guaranteed by the ECHR, he had to refer the case to the Parliament’s Supervisory Authority and be authorized to communicate to them the President of the Federal Criminal Court’s wrongful act and the contents of the criminal complaint against him.

In view of this position taken by the General Prosecutor of the Confederation, Stefan Blättler, who said that he could no longer manage the file and that he was forwarding it to the Supervisory Authority, Dr Erni - whose objective is to get the respect the values of the ECHR - authorized that the criminal complaint against the President of the Federal Criminal Court be made public.

The fact that the Prosecutor General Stefan Blättler could not enforce the values of the ECHR and that he transmitted the file to the High Supervisory Authorities, saying that he could not handle the file, showed already the Supervisory Authorities that the procedures of the Public Prosecutor’s Office were not sufficient to enforce the ECHR..

However, no one could know the reasons for this, since Prosecutor Stefan Blätter had no right to reveal the contents of the criminal complaint filed against Roy GARRÉ, the President of the Federal Criminal Court.

In order to be able to respect the values of the ECHR, he had to be able to communicate to the High Supervisory Authorities the act of the President of the Federal Criminal Court known as Dr X.. It should be emphasized that this act of injustice must also be known to all citizens who can no longer trust the Federal Judges with such procedures.

It is up to everyone to discover the complaint filed against Dr X, which is no longer confidential, and which shows the High Supervisory Authorities how federal judges have the power to violate the ECHR Values :

Read exhibit :221221DE_SB

The President of the Confederation, Alain BERSET, is aware of this crime committed with the violation of the Values of the ECHR by Swiss magistrates

read exhibit : 230411DE_AB

Now all elected officials and all citizens know who Dr X is. Everyone can discover that Jacques RAYROUD, Deputy General Prosecutor of Confederation, considers it normal that the President of the Federal Criminal Court, financed by our taxes, violates the rights of our people by making it impossible for them to appeal against organized crime with millions of damages and death threats.

This quote could be from Einstein who said :

«The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who look at them without doing anything » 

... it is not from Einstein, it’s from Martin Candinas,

the first citizen of the country, who answers the journalist Fanny Zürcher who asks him if he fears attacks against elected officials, and if he will still dare to travel by train!

Martin Candinas

President of the Swiss Parliament     

A great Sage who is committed to acting so that elected officials respect the Values of the Constitution.

To listen to the interview of 19 February 2023 of the President of Parliament by journalist Fanny Zürcher of the RTS.

RTS replay 19h30 0f 19 February 23

This beautiful quote from Martin Candinas could become the motto of Parliament:

"Act so that elected officials can always take the train"

WHO KNOWS PARLIAMENT’S WELL-KEPT SECRET ?

Who has heard of the crimes committed with the violation of the conflict of interest prohibition ?

Who knows that the 2023 federal election will be vitiated with Parliament’s well-guarded secret ?

To discover the well-kept secret of the Parliament that makes Guy Parmelin and the elected officials fear to be killed by an attack.

Read exhibit : 230224DE_MC

Alain BERSET must break the law of silence so that elected officials can always take the train, to read  exhibit : 230224DE_AB

Everyone must act so that our elected representatives can always take the train !

For citizens who want to join forces so that our elected representatives can always take the train, for those who want to end the WELL-KEPT SECRET OF PARLIAMENT .....

...send a message to participate in this big paradigm shift in the functioning of Parliament on the following email:

swissaudit.one@gmail.com

Above all do not hesitate to publish on social networks the following document:

230224DE_MC

URL: http://www.swisstribune.org/doc/230224DE_MC.pdf

... for everyone to discover the WELL-KEPT SECRET OF PARLIAMENT HIDDEN FROM THE PEOPLE until today,...

Remember that :

« ACT SO THAT ELECTED OFFICIALS CAN ALWAYS TAKE THE TRAIN »,...

... means to elect in 2023 citizens who commit to act in accordance with the Values of the Constitution.

230224DE_MC

051217DP_GC

230224DE_AB

WISHES AND COMMITMENT
OF
ALAIN BERSET

President of Confederation

Following the 180 degree change made in 2022 by the Swiss Attorney General’s Office, under the leadership of the new Attorney General of Confederation, who reminded federal judges that constitutional law provides that: :

«In the event of a conflict of law, it is the higher law, the constitutional law, that must apply and not the lower law...»

Reminder that was made in connection with crimes committed with the violation of the prohibition of conflict of interest by legal professionals, etc.…

ALAIN BERSET paid tribute to the Swiss Constitution of 1848,..., recalling that the fundamental rights guaranteed by this Constitution apply to all Swiss with the maxim:

"THE STATE IS US"

Which was no longer the case,
before 2023

Listen to :

RTS REPLAY 19h30, 1.1.2023

IT IS A 180-DEGREE COMMITMENT TO TURN THE PAGE AFTER THE COLLAPSE OF OUR RULE OF LAW WITH THE JUDICIARY FAILING TO RESPECT FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE ECHR !

Before January 1, 2023, we could no longer say in Switzerland that :

« THE STATE IS US »

One could only say in Switzerland that :

« THE STATE IS THE WHOLE OF ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES WHO EXERCISE THE OMERTA ON THE VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE ECHR WITH THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM»

In other words, the State was only a handful of citizens, among them Me Philippe BAUER, Michael LAUBER, Dr Adrian URWYLER, were eminent examples.

The latter used the falsehood to deceive the people.

Thanks to the OMERTA exercised by the supervisory authorities on their lies as well as that of the cantonal and federal ministers, including the members of the Federal Council, it was impossible to unmask them.

.... in short, before January 1, 2023, the Values expressed in the 1848 Constitution were forgotten in the Federal Palace. One could legitimately wonder if this paper document was not used as toilet paper for the magistrates and the sworn deputies who imposed the law of silence on its contents....

For example, Philippe Bauer never asked federal judges to respect articles 9 and 35 of the Constitution, or the human rights guaranteed by the ECHR, when he asked federal judges to violate the rights of the people guaranteed by the ECHR with procedural codes that do not allow to respect the Constitution

To read : 230106DE_AB

Since January 1st, 2023, Alain BERSET wants to enforce the Values of the Constitution

He used one of his formulas that could be a slogan on a T-shirt:

"Commitment is the opposite of withdrawal into oneself, and it is realizing that the problems of others will sooner or later become our problems"

With this magnificent commitment, Alain BERSET can explain to the children of the elected officials, the story of the mediator who wanted to break the OMERTA exercised by the elected officials who caused the massacre in Zug,...,...,

....and which in turn was censored by Parliament, which had given it the mandate...

...Alain BERSET can explain to the children of the elected representatives that this censorship of the mediator exercised by the Vaudois parliament has become the problem of all Swiss parliamentarians who violate Articles 9 and 35 of the Federal Constitution, with the assurance that the Supervisory Authorities will protect them with OMERTA.

To read : 230115DE_AB

BASELINE DATA 2023

Summary

The major dysfunction of the judicial system that violates the values of the ECHR has been identified:

In a conflict of law, the magistrates dominate the lower rights over the higher ones, while they must do the opposite

* * *

Status at the end of 2022

THE SWISS ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE NEW ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CONFEDERATION, RECALLED THAT IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH ARTICLE 9 AND 35 OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION :

“in the event of a conflict of law, it is always the superior law that must prevail, whereas in this case*, it is always the inferior law that federal judges have made prevail”

NOTE THAT :

Article 9 of the Federal Constitution is violated whenever a magistrate obstructs the judicial action with procedural codes that do not allow to respect the fundamental rights of the Constitution including Article 9, which is itself the guarantor of one of these fundamental rights

(*) Case of the facts described in the 2005 request for a parliamentary inquiry from an elite of citizens 051217DP_GC

OBJECTIFS 2023

Process

Require the Federal Authorities to put an end to the major dysfunction of the judicial system that violates the Values enshrined in the ECHR, with the following measure:

To elect independent federal judges who ensure that in the event of a conflict of law, judges always apply superior law instead of applying the inferior law

* * *

Process for Elected Officials

WE ARE ALL EQUAL BEFORE THE LAW. ARTICLE 9 OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION DOES NOT ALLOW TO VIOLATE THE RIGHTS OF CITIZENS BY MEMBERS OF THE AUTHORITIES WHO IMPOSE OMERTA ON CRIMES COMMITTED BY OUR MAGISTRATES!. !.

In 2023, all elected officials must remind all state judges and officials that they are required to respect Article 35 (fundamental rights) and Article 9 (protection against arbitrariness and protection of good faith) in their decisions. In particular, they must preach to them that: :

« “in the event of a conflict of law, it is always the superior law that must prevail, whereas in this case*, it is always the inferior law that federal judges have made prevail” »

It must be written in the Constitution that the Authority for the Supervision of the Respect of the Values of the Constitution by its magistrates: :

IS THE PEOPLE

...for this requirement to be respected, the people must be validly represented by the 90% of citizens who are without parties....

... That is not the case today.

In 2005, the elite of non-political Swiss citizens who filed the request for a parliamentary inquiry could say :

THE STATE IS NO MORE US !

while Swiss citizens, according to the Swiss Constitution, must be able to say :

THE STATE IS US !

2022

happy New Year

BEST WISHES TO ALL READERS OF THIS SITE

31.12.22

YEAR IN REVIEW 2022

THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CONFEDERATION (OAG), UNDER THE NEW ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CONFEDERATION, HAS GIVEN A GLIMMER OF HOPE TO ALL CITIZENS WHO COMPLAIN ABOUT THE VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 9 AND 35 OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION BY FEDERAL AUTHORITIES.

Indeed, in charge of dealing with one of the files of Michael LAUBER, which shows the violation of the constitutional rights and the rights guaranteed by the ECHR, one of the collaborators of the OAG paid attention to the magistrates of the Federal Criminal Court that :

«“in the event of a conflict of law, it is always the superior law that must prevail, whereas in this case (*), it is always the inferior law that federal judges have made prevail” »

........ it is a 180 degree turn that has just been initiated by the new Attorney General of Confederation

THANKS

A very big thank you to those who make these facts public, while the Press is censored

(*) Some details on the file / case

This is the case of the facts described in the 2005 request for a parliamentary inquiry from an elite of citizens. It is recalled that this request for a parliamentary investigation found the violation of the Values expressed in the ECHR by the Federal Authorities.

To reread :051217DP_GC.

Switzerland’s reputation - which claims to be able to resolve disputes through mediation - had proven to be misleading.

Parliament had appointed an ombudsman to deal with this matter. The mediator, who had confirmed the violation of the ECHR Values by the judiciary, had been censored by the members of the authorities who had appointed him.

Since 2005, the Federal Council had imposed OMERTA on this deceit of the people. The High Chambers of Parliament and the High Judicial Oversight Authorities also imposed OMERTA.

New fact in 2022

It states here that in 2022, the new Attorney General of Confederation received a copy of a legal opinion from a lawyer of the Permanent Legal Order of the Vaudois Bar Association.

This legal opinion concerned the intervention of Richard Bar President described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry.

This legal opinion stated that the law applied by the Richard Bar President did not exist…. it specified that these facts described a crime committed with the violation of the conflict of interest prohibition.

…all the magistrates who read the request for parliamentary inquiry knew immediately that it described economic crimes committed with the violation of the prohibition of conflict of interest by professionals of the law with the interventions of the Bar Presidents.

Finally, the Federal Criminal Court judges knew this. They knew that this document described organized crime..

In turn, they have grossly violated Articles 9 and 35 of the Federal Constitution, knowing that victims of crimes committed in violation of the prohibition of conflict of interest do not have access to independent federal judges.

To reread the appeal that was rejected by federal judges who are not independent: :

exhibit 220723 DE_TF

It is thanks to all those who make these violations of the Constitution visible in Switzerland, by resisting censorship, that our judges and elected officials must look twice before behaving like barbarians with the falsehood

A RTS journalist asked Claude WILD, the Swiss ambassador for Ukraine, whether Vladimir PUTIN was committing acts of terrorism.

Claude Wild said no. He said that he was committing acts of barbarism, which is more serious than acts of terrorism.

Vladimir PUTIN is not alone, in Afghanistan, in Libya, etc. ,…., ... even in Switzerland, we have senior leaders who violate the human rights of the people by acting like Vladimir Putin.

Discover here the barbaric acts of a Swiss leader, the Dr Adrian URWYLER.

Like Michael LAUBER, he was a Swiss, at the head of the judiciary, who used his position to violate the values of the Constitution, those of the ECHR and international law.

Claude WILD
Swiss Ambassador fo Ukraine

IInterview of Claude Wild by RTS journalist Philippe Revaz,

RTS replay 19h30 of 8 December 2022

Michael LAUBER, Dr Adrian URWYLER, Philippe BAUER have committed, or are accomplices of acts of barbarism

What is the difference between an act of terrorism and an act of barbarism?

Act of terrorism
The citizen, victim of an act of terrorism, can apply to the Court of a country to enforce his rights guaranteed by the ECHR. Procedural codes have been provided for judging acts of terrorism

Act of barbarism
The citizen who is the victim of an act of barbarism will not find any Court to enforce the values of the ECHR. It is the procedures put in place by senior leaders, above all suspicion, that are used to commit acts of barbarism.

When the supervisory authorities are alerted, they impose OMERTA on the violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR with these procedures.

Example of acts of barbarism in Switzerland
In 2017, the Fribourg Parliament was alerted to the existence of procedures that were applied by the Fribourg magistrates to violate the rights guaranteed by the ECHR.

These procedures were described in a request for a parliamentary inquiry. Read the request for a parliamentary inquiry below

Exhibit : 051217DP_GC,....

Then answer the questions :

(1) Where is the code of procedure which stipulates that it is necessary to get an authorization from the Bar President to be able to lodge a complaint against Foetisch and that the Bar President may refuse to give the authorization ?

(2) Who initiated this procedure?

The President of Parliament, Mr. Bruno BOSCHUNG, was not aware of these procedures. He immediately understood that they violated the fundamental human rights guaranteed by the ECHR !
In 2017, he committed to obtaining a response from a senior justice official, above all suspicion, Dr. Adrian URWYLER

This magistrate was as powerful as Michael LAUBER. He was President of the Judicial Council, President of the Tribunal and procedural writer.

The President of Parliament was never able to get an answer. In May 2022, a member of the College of Lawyers revealed that this right did not exist, and Dr.Adrian URWYLER knew it !

To discover the barbaric acts of Dr Adrian URWYLER who imposed OMERTA on the issues that show the violation of the ECHR.

Even worse, he himself used these procedures to commit acts of wrongdoing, knowing himself untouchable by his position, as is Vladimir PUTIN!

=> read : 221212DE_GC

Charles Michel
President of the European Council

He does not practice OMERTA. His chief of staff immediately responds, to read the message addressed to Ignazio CASSIS

It must be observed that the European Council does not have a famous Senator like Philippe BAUER who can obtain from the Federal Court a judgment that says:

IF A UNIQUE WITNESS LAWYER OF A SLANDEROUS DENONCIATION IS PROHIBITED FROM TESTIFYING BY HIS BAR PRESIDENT WHILE HE WANTS TO TESTIFY, AND REFUSES TO TESTIFY AFTER BEING FORBIDDEN TO TESTIFY FOR NOT DISOBEYING THE BAR PRESIDENT, THEN IT IS NOT AN UNLAWFUL BREACH OF THE CLIENT’S PERSONNALITY. IN THAT CASE, IT IS UP TO THE CLIENT TO BEAR THE DAMAGE A LONG AS HIS LAWYER DID NOT DARE DISOBEY THE BAR PRESIDENT.

To discover the Values of Philippe BAUER in this letter addressed to the President of Parliament: 221026DE_IK

The French are not searched naked like doctors and those who want the respect of the rights guaranteed by the ECHR. Censorship does not exist in France, discover the letter addressed to journalist Philippe REVAZ : 221118DE_PR

and to Ignazio CASSIS : 221117DE_IC

The President of the Council of State, Mrs Christelle LUISIER, explained that justice sometimes has major dysfunctions. It was necessary to have an external supervisory body.

It could have been a “People’s Council”. Parliament proposed a “Judicial Council.

The important thing is that this Supervisory Authority ensures respect for the fundamental rights of citizens, in complete transparency.

Mrs Christelle LUISIER
President of the Council of State

Presentation of the first dossier

Dr. Erni announced himself as the first complainant. It’s a very simple but very important case.

This case is described by a request for a parliamentary inquiry of witnesses to a Tribunal hearing. They announced themselves as witnesses of a major malfunction of justice, namely the violation of the rights guaranteed by the ECHR with the interventions of Bar Presidents RICHARD, BETTEX, etc...

Read : 051217DP_GC

Facts established, May 19, 2022

It took 27 years, of proceedings, censored with OMERTA, until a member of the Bar Association lega staf explained that :

All lawyers who read the request for a parliamentary inquiry know that such behaviour describes a violation of the conflict of interest prohibition.

........ it is incomprehensible that the prosecutors and examining magistrate of the canton vaud have never spoken of this violation of the prohibition of conflict of interest which caused millions of damages .

Citizen initiative

Citizens and Authorities are advised to confiscate the fortune of Philippe Bauer, Christian BETTEX and Patrick Foetisch who could not have caused this damage without using the violation of the interdition of the Conflict of Interest, with the help of magistrates

See exhibit 220922DE_PC

It all started in 1995

Patrick Foetisch is Chairman of the ICSA Board of Directors. He commits offences of unfair management, fraud and copyright infringement!

He justifies his offences with the following argument:

« ….I advise you not to complain as I am untouchable by my high-level relationships and offences will never be investigated… …if you dare to do so, I will have you ruined and demolished to make unnecessary procedure until there is a prescription …. If you don’t give up and manage to survive, you will have to last at least 10 years and after that there will be prescription anyway

The reason why Foetisch is untouchable

When I want to file a criminal complaint against Patrick Foetisch for fraud, unfair management and copyright infringement, I am informed that Parliament has provided that an authorization from the Bar President is required in order to be able to file a complaint against a Chairman of the Board of Directors of a company that commits crimes..., in the case where he is a member of the Bar Association.

This is a gross violation of equality before the law put in place by the Parliament. My lawyer asks the Bar President, Philippe RICHARD, to be allowed to file a complaint against Foetisch, Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA. The Bar President, next door neighbors to Foetisch, refuses to give permission for a complaint to be filed against the Foetisch for the crimes he committed..

I unsuccessfully ask to see the procedural code that contains this rule.

For 27 years, no lawyer can tell me where that right is. My lawyer, Mr. Schaller, tells me that this right does not exist !

He asks the Bar Association to produce the document with the motivations used by the Bar President, Philippe Richard, to prohibit Foetisch from being the subject of a criminal complaint.

Lawyer, Philippe BAUER, Neuchâtel Bar President, provided the document. This document shows that it was enough for Patrick Foetisch, Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA, not to answer the summons of Bar President, Philippe Richard, to get that his economic crimes could not be investigated and to obtain the prescription !

Developments as of May 19, 2022

On May 19, 2022, I asked Mr.Thierry AMY of the Bar association’s legal office to tell me the code of procedure where this rule was.

See exhibit: 220518_OAV

IlHe immediately replied that this right did not exist and that it was a violation of the conflict of interest prohibition.

For non-lawyers, like the undersigned, I have learned that the Courts consider that a Chairman of the Board of Directors of a company, who is a lawyer, can consult himself. In this case, there may be a conflict of interest.

Testimony collected by Eric COTTIER in 2002

This reminded me that in 2002, I asked magistrate Eric Cottier to call Patrick Foetisch, Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA, to testify. I had discovered that Patrick Foetisch had commissioned Me Patrick Foetisch to represent him to Eric COTTIER, and :

" The lawyer Patrick Foetisch had given evidence to Eric COTTIER that Patrick FOETISCH had violated copyright"".

To read the letter sent to the President of the Council of State for more details, it is not Kramer against Kramer, but Me Foetisch against Foetisch.

See exhibit 221006DE_CL

Other legal professionals have also said that the request for a parliamentary inquiry describes the actions of an infiltrated criminal organization in Parliament.

In short, the Judicial Council has a first case which describes a major dysfunction of justice by an elite of citizens who announce themselves witnesses to the violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR by our magistrates.

051217DP_GC

221006DE_CL

This Fribourg woman observed that it was enough for Alain BERSET to send a simple letter to the Authorities, without having to pay expensive appeal, to obtain the relocation of the Antenna. On the other hand, Chantal Blanc with more than 600 people and costly appeal is unable to move a 5G antenna.

To listen to: TJ 19h30 25.08.2022

This is not surprising because the Federal Court has just pronounced a judgment in which it says that the codes of procedure do not allow it to enforce the rights guaranteed by the ECHR.

To read :

Calls on the Federal Court to enforce the ECHR by the Federal Council:

Exhibit : 220723DE_TF

Refusal of the Federal Court to enforce the ECHR by the federal Council

Exhibit : 220727TF_DE

A complaint was filed with the High Supervisory Authority of the Federal Court

To read : 220810DE_IK

Having met with the POPE and having spoken about respect for human rights,.....

..... Alain BERSET knows that he has no right to remain silent if the federal judges cannot enforce human rights

Alain BERSET received the testimony of an elite of citizens who describe practices that make people shudder to racket, harass and threaten citizens with death. He knows that these citizens found that the Federal Council did not respect the rights guaranteed by the ECHR. This is notably evidenced by the testimony of this elite of citizens with a request for a parliamentary inquiry :

To read : 051217DP_GC

He knows that the Federal Council is committed to upholding these rights by signing the ECHR. It is a signed contract by the Federal Council that he must honour to respect the will of our people.

If Alain BERSET moves an antenna to protect his children, what would he do if his children were racketeered, harassed and threatened with death, following the abominable revelation of the Federal Court !

To observe that if Alain BERSET managed to move a 5G antenna to protect his family, he has the power to act despite the abominable revelation of the Federal Court.

In particular, Alain BERSET has the power to change the procedural codes so that federal judges can no longer violate the rights guaranteed by the ECHR. This is part of the power and duty of the Federal Councillors.

A Fribourg citizen who is being harassed, racketeered, and was threatened with death, asked him to take action,….. to read :

Request to Alain BERSET : 220902DE_CF

….It is Alain BERSET’s role to act, even if members of his party could be involved in organized crime....

The POPE regularly recalls that it is the duty of the leaders of the countries to break the law of silence on the violation of human rights.

If an elite of citizens had the courage to describe the violation of human rights in Switzerland by testimony with the filing of a request for a parliamentary inquiry,….. it is now up to Alain BERSET to act…..

This action is all the more important as a lawyer says that he has no other solutions to propose than to have a Federal Councillor shot down to put an end to the violation of human rights with the practices that make one shudder described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry.

However, there is another solution : it is that Alain BERSET breaks the silence on the violation of access to independent Courts guaranteed by the ECHR.... , and do what he did for Covid-19.

He knows that when procedural codes do not protect citizens, but instead serve to endanger the fundamental rights and lives of citizens, the Federal Council can and must act. He showed that the role of the Federal Council is to uphold the rights of the people. In the case of Covid-19, it put in place emergency measures to respect human rights.

The Supervisory Authority of the Federal Council was informed. It was asked to break the law of silence by Alain BERSET,

Request to the High Supervisory Authority of the Federal Court and the Federal Council, to read exhibit: 220905DE_SP

if Alain BERSET needs a demonstration in Belfaux to justify breaking the silence, it would not be a problem to organise it…

This extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, Me Jean-Bernard SCHMID, explains that parliamentarians have planned that :

« the mandates given to prosecutors by the Federal Authorities do not allow them to investigate crimes committed with the interventions of the BAR Presidents described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry »

The Prosecutors, charged with investigating these cases of violation of the prohibition of conflict of interest, can therefore only make a denial of justice, when they receive the mandate to investigate these crimes committed with the facts described in the request for parliamentary investigation.

The result is that :

«  the law is reversed » for crimes committed by lawyers and legal professionals with the prohibition of breach of conflict of interest described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry »

Read again exhibit :051217DP_GC, with the comments of 1.07.2022 , below.

Everyone can check on exhibits that :

With a hidden manner from the people, those who commit the crimes with the interventions of the Bar President are protected by the judges, who have no right to investigate the crimes committed with the interventions of the Bar Presidents.

The orders of non-investigation in matter are one of the tools that allow them to reverse the law, as has moreover shown the Prosecutor General Ruedi MONTANARI

Read the reply of the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor communicated to the Federal Councillor Alain BERSET :

220727DE_AB

Now Alain BERSET has the explanation of this extraordinary Federal Prosecutor that finally allows him to understand :

"why a dissident lawyer said in 2016 that words no longer serve to force Parliamentarians to respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the CEDH with the magistrates they are appointing..

Alain BERSET

He is the only Federal Councillor who has been waiting for the response of the extraordinary Federal Prosecutor Jean-Bernard Schmid.

He now knows what the Federal Council must do to put an end to the chilling practices described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry.

It should be noted that when an elite of citizens sees the violation of the ECHR with practices that make people shudder, federal elected officials and judges cannot ignore it.

Nor can they ignore the facts established in 2007 by the expert of the Vaudois Parliament Me de ROUGEMONT.

It was only in 2016, for the first time, that a lawyer spoke of the “prohibition of conflict of interest” used to cover the crimes committed by Patrick FOETISCH. It did not prove the reasons why he said that a criminal organization, where Foetisch is highly placed, is infiltrated in Parliament. This did not explain any more why this lawyer said that he had no other solutions to propose than to have a Federal Councillor shot down in order to force our elected officials to respect the fundamental rights of judges in their decisions.

Today, the answers of the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor to Alain BERSET’s questions allow us to understand him

Alternative :

Yet there is another solution: Federal Judges must force the Federal Council to enforce the ECHR.

To resolve this substantive issue, an appeal was filed in the Federal Court by Dr.Erni with the following requests, citation:

REQUEST
I hereby ask federal judges to :

1. Note, as established by Me De ROUGEMONT, that the codes of procedure do not allow to take into account the offences and crimes committed with the interventions of the Bar Presidents as confirmed by the extraordinary federal prosecutor who is not allowed to investigate them extraordinaire qui ne peut pas instruire
2. Note that the limitation of the mandate of the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor Jean-Bernard Schmid - which does not allow him to take into account the testimony of the public (Exhibit 2) for investigating the criminal complaint against Ruedi MONTANARI violates the rights guaranteed by the ECHR, and Article 9 of the Federal Constitution
3. To cancel its order of non-investigation the case for denial of justice made with a procedural codes that do not take into account the facts established by the request for a parliamentary inquiry, as well as the violation of access to independent tribunals
4. Order the Federal Council to immediately put an end to the damage done for 27 years with these interventions of the Bar President and to repair them knowing that they were committed by those who must render justice: the role of justice has been reversed with the interventions of the Bar Presidents
5. Order the Federal Council to set up a supervisory authority, composed of competent magistrates, elected directly by citizens of the people, to respect the separation of powers and the rights guaranteed by the ECHR. This supervisory authority should be independent of political parties in view of the behaviour of the State Counsellors and the Federal Counsellors who were aware of the request for parliamentary investigation and who do not act, knowing that it describes the violation of the prohibition conflict of interest.
6. Order the Federal Council to ensure that the law on the liability of the Confederation for damages caused without right with the interventions of the Bar Presidents and the violation of the prohibition of the conflict of interest works with Courts whose magistrates are elected directly by the people and without a political party.
7. Order the Federal Council to set up Courts whose judges are completely independent and can respect the ECHR without any political constraint.
8. Note that it is unacceptable that it took 27 years for Me Thierry AMY to reveal the existence of this violation of the prohibition of conflict of interest
9. Note that the procedural codes do not allow the interventions of Bar President to be taken into account. The damages I have suffered would not exist without the interventions of the Bar Presidents, do not ask for any costs for this remedy whose only purpose is to put an end to the offences and crimes committed with the violation of access to independent Courts guaranteed by the ECHR
10. After having put these measures in place, I ask you to recuse yourself, since the current procedural codes do not make you independent of the bar, to judge this case as demonstrated by the former Bâtonnier Philippe BAUER.

For more details please read the appeal : pièce 220723 DE_TF

"ALL MEMBERS OF THE SWISS PARLIAMENTS WHO ARE LAWYERS KNEW THAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE SWISS BAR, ME PHILIPPE RICHARD, HAD COVERED THE CRIMES OF PATRICK FOETISCH BY VIOLATING THE PROHIBITION ON CONFLICT OF INTEREST"

For 27 years all the lawyers of the Federal Parliament and those of the Cantonal Parliaments, who read the request for a parliamentary inquiry,...

read : 051217DP_GC

...... know that the Bar President, Me Philippe RICHARD, violated the prohibition of conflict of interest to give advantages to the Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA, Me Foetisch, member of the Order of Lawyers…. ,

........ but he is not the only one,…. all judges, lawyers - who have taken decisions in this given context - also knew this and they did not recuse themselves for violation of access to independent Tribunals, as advocated by Me De Rougemont, the expert of the Vaudois Parliament, so that the rights guaranteed by the ECHR are not violated..

...on the contrary, they violated the ECHR in order to give advantages to their fellow lawyers.

In this given context, the control of a legal opinion given by two experienced lawyers, with the legal permanence of the Vaud Bar Association, finally made it possible to explain the decision of the Bar President Me Philippe RICHARD, with those of several former Bar Presidents, including Me Christian BETTEX, Me Claude ROUILLER, Me Philippe BAUER, who violate the fundamental rights of the people guaranteed by the ECHR...

It has been established that they are using the violation of the prohibition of conflict of interest, a means hidden from the people by parliamentarians, which allows them to violate access to independent Tribunals and obtain acts of defamation from federal judges, as Philippe Bauer did.

This situation is unbelievable since the Federal Council has signed the ECHR and is committed to enforcing it.

The explanation for this violation of the ECHR by a dissident lawyer, author of one of the legal opinions, is that Parliaments are under the control of a criminal organization infiltrated in the State.... which allows its members to commit crimes with impunity with the violation of the prohibition of conflict of interest

see exhibit: 220525_OAV

......hence the interest of having made the control of these two legal opinions, given by two experienced lawyers, anonymously with a member of the legal staff of the Vaud Bar Association, so as not to influence the result.

TESTIMONY OF THE BAR PRESIDENT PHILIPPE RICHARD ON HIS ACTIONS

The Bar President Me Philippe RICHARD had been summoned to the Court as a witness to explain under oath the reasons why Patrick Foetisch was entitled to have the Vaud Bar Association which forbid that his offences could be investigated.

Vaud Bar President
Me Philippe RICHARD

His sworn testimony which showed the violation of the ECHR deeply outraged the elite of citizens who heard him.

The latter filed a request for a parliamentary inquiry into the violation of the ECHR by the authorities with the facts established by the testimony of this Vaudois personality.

See exhibit : 051217DP_GC

She did so after the President of the FSA (Swiss Federation of Lawyers) said that Mr Foetisch was not a member of the Bar Association

According to the Legal Permanence of the Vaud Bar Association : it is the CHAMBERS OF LAWYERS that has the competence to enforce the Constitution when a BAR PRESIDENT lawyer, like Me Philippe RICHARD violates the prohibition of conflict of interest! !

CHILLING REMARKS

According to the legal permanence of the Vaud Bar Association :

All lawyers, members of Parliament, and judges, lawyers, know what a violation of the prohibition of conflict of interest is,

According to this legal permanence, they all know that the law used by the Bar President Philippe RICHARD does not exist....

 Note that the members of the Vaud Bar Associations legal permanence had the same reaction as he one of the dissident lawyer and the one of the President of the FSA :

they immediately spoke of the violation of the prohibition of conflict of interest, whereas parliamentarians, lawyers, who know the request for a parliamentary inquiry, have always hidden the existence of this means available to the professionals of the law to violate the rights of the people! !

The fact that Foetisch would not have been a member of the Vaud Bar Association complicates, even worsens the situation as long as the BAR PRESIDENT, Philippe RICHARD, would have given advantages to a colleague, who is not a member of the Vaud Bar Association, with this right (Interdiction to complaint against Foetisch) that does not exist..

It should be noted that the permanence of the Vaud Bar Association could not give more details without knowing in detail Foetisch’s relationship with the Vaud Bar Association. The legal opinion was requested anonymously, without divulging the names of the lawyers involved.

It is incredible that for 27 years, not a single lawyer,  member of Parliament, has taken the decision to uphold the fundamental rights of the people, guaranteed by the Constitution, rather than giving benefits to their colleagues......,

.......while their Oath of Elect obliges them to put respect for the rights of the people before their private interests !

It is unheard of that not only have all parliamentarians managed to hide the existence of this prohibition of conflict of interest to the people, but that several of them, including Me Philippe BAUER, have used it to deprive a citizen, Dr Erni, of the right to be represented by his lawyer, Mr Rudolf Schaller.

The intervention of the dissident lawyer facing the silence of parliamentarians on the violation of Article 35 of the Constitution:

With the legal opinion of the legal permanence of the Vaud Bar Association, it seems likely that the dissident lawyer could be a lawyer, member of Parliament, who decided to uphold the rights of the people

This would explain why this lawyer claimed that there was a criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament that imposes silence on the violation of Article 35 of the Constitution by those entrusted with a task of the State....

This explains why this lawyer said that:

"The words were no longer useful and he had no other solutions to propose than to have a Federal Councillor shot down in order to force parliamentarians to enforce by the magistrates the fundamental rights of the people guaranteed by the ECHR in their decisions (respect Article 35 of the Constitution)

Consequences of the legal opinion of the legal permanence of the Vaud Bar Association

A complaint, based on these three legal opinions of experienced lawyers was filed at the Chamber of Lawyers

See Exhibit: 220531DE_CA

The President of the Confederation, who is not a lawyer, was made aware of this situation of violation of the ECHR by all the lawyers, members of Parliament..

See exhibit : 220612DE_IC

By having revealed the existence of these crimes committed with the violation of the prohibition of conflict of interest, hidden from the people for at least 27 years, the permanence of the Vaud Bar Association  makes it possible to understand why 99 parliamentarians would want to censor the Press.....

..... see comments of May 18, 2022 below.

...... this is the time for the remaining minority of elected representatives and for the Press to fight to defend the fundamental rights of all citizens!

ESPECIALLY NOW IS THE TIME FOR THE CHAMBER OF ATTORNEYS TO DEAL WITH THESE THREE LEGAL OPINIONS BASED ON THE TESTIMONY OF AN ELITE OF CITIZENS TO WHOM PARLIAMENTARIANS HAVE CONCEALED THE EXISTENCE OF THIS PROHIBITION ON BREACH OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST.......

.... IT IS ALSO TIME FOR THE FEDERAL COUNCIL TO END THE LAW OF SILENCE ON THE EXISTENCE OF THIS VIOLATION OF THE PROHIBITION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST, USED BY FOETISCH TO COMMIT HIS CRIMES,....

..... ALSO USED BY THE FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE BAR PHILIPPE BAUER TO OBTAIN A DECREE FROM THE FEDERAL COURT WHICH STATES THAT A LAWYER MUST DISOBEY THE BAR PRESIDENT SO THAT THE RIGHTS OF HIS CLIENT GUARANTEED BY THE ECHR ARE NOT VIOLATED BY THE STATE....

....... ALSO QUOTED BY THE DISSIDENT LAWYER TO SAY THAT IT IS NEEDED TO HAVE A MAURICE BAVAUD WHO SHOOTS A FEDERAL COUNCILLOR TO PUT AN END TO THE VIOLATION OF THE ECHR BY THE FEDERAL COUNCIL, WITH THIS VIOLATION OF THE PROHIBITION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST!

....

051217DP_GC

220525_OAV

220531DE_CA

220612DE_IC

A decision taken by 99 parliamentarians, violating the Constitution, will allow the judiciary to cover the crimes of members of the criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament with impunity.

TJ of May 10 / 7 PM 30

Claude ANSERMOZ, Denis de MASMEJAN, …. have the courage to sound the alarm about the violation of Article 17 of the Constitution by these 99 elected representatives.

Listen to the interview of Claude Ansermoz :

Interview of May 10th 7 PM 30

To discover how one of the members of this criminal organization had threatened the former editor of the 24 HEURES NEWSPAPER.

220517DE_CA

Claude Ansermoz
24 Heures Editor-in-Chief

Il constate que c'est intolérable que 99 parlementaires violent l'article 17 de la Constitution suisse.

...Democracy will not survives...

..... Poutine showed that when a country’s government censors the press, human rights violations exist, even if the press can no longer show them. Worse than that, he showed that the government can deceive the people about the facts, by presenting itself as a victim when it is the aggressor. He showed that the censorship of the press allows to reverse the facts.....

Observations :

....... the Press has never informed the people that a dissident lawyer says that Swiss people needs a Maurice Bavaud who shoots a Federal Councillor to put an end to the activities of this criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament....

.....furthermore, the Press never informed the people about the way in which the Deputy Federal Prosecutor of Confederation, Ruedi Montanari, had protected the members of the criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament...

to read : exhibit 220502DE_RM

Modus operandi of this criminal organization

The dissident lawyer explained that the members of this criminal organization neutralize the respect of the fundamental rights of the people guaranteed by the Constitution, with decisions that allow to circumvent the respect of these fundamental rights. Among them, there are members of a Masonic lodge who put in place procedures that make it possible to reverse the law and the reality of the facts.

He had announced that parliamentarians would ask the TF to deprive Dr.Erni of the right to be represented by Me Schaller. This is an unimaginable violation of the rights guaranteed by the ECHR. The facts proved him right. Christian BETTEX obtained this decision from the Federal Court, while Me Bettex knows that the role of a lawyer is to defend his client, and that it is not to the client, assisted by a lawyer, to have to defend himself alone because the State deprives him of the right to be represented by his lawyer.

This lawyer had cited several examples, including the "chilling practices" described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry that showed how the law was being reversed.

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

Reminder of article 17 of Federal Constitution:

Art. 17 - Freedom of the medias

1 Freedom of the press, radio and television, and other forms of broadcasting of productions and information relating to public telecommunications shall be guaranteed.

2 Censorship is prohibited.

3 Editorial secrecy is guaranteed.

Observation nr 1: Threats against journalists

It is thanks to the respect of the Freedom of the Media, despite the threats that can exercise on journalists, the members of the criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament, as for example those exercised on Federico CAMPONOVO...

to read : 220517DE_CA

... that democracy has been able to survive and the people remain sovereign by being informed, for example, of Mikael LAUBER’s sessions without Minutes and of the investigation he was the subject of.

Until today, the respect of article 17 by elected officials was one of the best means of combating corruption cases and the activities of the criminal organization infiltrated in parliament

Observation nr 2. Survival of Democracy

There are 81 sworn members who know that they must respect article 17 of the Constitution. They refused to violate it, but they do not represent the majority of Parliament.

As a result, democracy has not survived and the people are no longer sovereign. It has been enslaved by the members of this criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament.

Oservation nr 3: Federal Court and Personality Protection

In 2009, the Neuchâtel Court ruled that the intervention of Me Christian BETTEX (President of the Bar) who had forbidden a witness of crimes to testify was a breach of personality.

See judgment exhibit : 090302CC_DE (last page).

The press has talked about it....

Me Philippe BAUER, current Councilor to the States, asked the Federal Court to quash this judgment with the argument that the witness, forbidden to testify by the President of the Bar, should have disobeyed the President of the Bar, Christian BETTEX !!!

It would be necessary for the National Councillor, Me Christian LÜSCHER, to explain to the people, how the justiz can protect the personality of a citizen, if his lawyer must disobey the President of the Bar to protect the personality of this citizen.

It is recalled that Dr Erni is not a lawyer and that this intervention of the President of the Bar was used to muzzle the witness who could testify that Dr Erni had lost the provisional measures following a forgery in the Titles made by a judge. This fact could also have been testified by the general Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter or the Chief Justice Jacques Antenen.

Me Philippe BAUER knew that Dr ERNI had been dismissed because of this personality attack with the slanderous denunciation of his colleague Me Yves Burnand.

See exhibit CEDH2021_11

See also : 020612DE_JS

Because of a right cleverly hidden from the people by the legislator, which violates Article 9 of the Federal Constitution(Article 9: Everyone has the right to be treated by the organs of the State without arbitrariness and in accordance with the rules of good faith) :

None of the candidates elected to the Vaudois State Council can enforce the fundamental rights of 95% of our population, which are guaranteed by the ECHR. That is, the majority of citizens who are not affiliated with a party.

The newly elected representatives will have to exercise censorship, by systematically violating Article 9 of the Federal Constitution to justify the violation of the fundamental rights of the 95% of the population guaranteed by the ECHR by their parties. They will do this for example with super shows on TikTok and by having the Swiss Broadcasting, which censors that they violate the ECHR

Exhibit 220328DE_CB

These elected representatives knew that in order to be elected to the Council of State, their parties asked them for having two competences :

(1) to know smiling on TikTok or equivalent skill

(2) undertake not to respond to those who asked them whether they would uphold the fundamental rights of the population guaranteed by the ECHR, or know how to use stereotyped format language to answer them knowing that they had to violate the rights guaranteed by the ECHR and article 9 of the Federal Constitution to be elected

Like depute at the Grand Conseil Vaud, Me Jessica Jaccoud, candidates have all heard about the hidden right from the people.. but maybe not in enough detail,,..

he Swiss Broadcasting (RTS) has been censored on . It cannot explain to 95% of the population that only magistrates who undertake not to respect the ECHR are proposed by the parties. Only young people have found a way to break the censorship of the RTS on the violation of their rights guaranteed by the ECHR, by sticking their hand on the highway

Jessica Jaccoud
Lawyer
Grand Council Deputy
Vaud PS President

By not being willing to answer the legal issues raised by the hidden right from the people, Jessica Jaccoud confirmed in fact that the elections were flawed by the highest authorities of the country who do not want to enforce the ECHR.

Her statement responds to a message from a Shaman for the National Councillor Andrea CARONI that only he knows. This national Concillor knows what he must do to put an end to the violation of Article 9 of the Federal Constitution by the highest authorities of the country.

He has the freedom to do so and he knows the consequences for our nation and his family according to his decision..

Exhibit 220418DE_JJ

Me Jessica Jaccoud recalled that elected officials have chosen to violate the rights of the people by according to the General Prosecutor, Eric COTTIER, the power to violate the rights of the people with procedures that do not exist according to a lawyer of the CAP.

She no longer hides that deputies of the Grand Council have chosen a General Prosecutor to give advantages to the elected, rather than to respect the rights of the people

Exhibit 220418DE_JJ

She also recalled that knowing the behavior of Jean-Marc Schwenter (former general Prosecutor), elected officials had already chosen in the past a Prosecutor General who violated the rights of the people

See exhibit 020612DE_JS.

With her reply, knowing the actions of Jean-Jacques ANTENEN, she also recalled that the elected officials knew that the Council of State had hired a chief of police over any suspicion that explained to the litigants in secret sessions without Minutes that the judges of the State had made them lose the provisional measures by introducing testimonies of witnesses who never existed.

EShe showed that Parliament knew that the request for a parliamentary inquiry described practices that made one shudder worthy of POUTINE,

To be read again exhibit : 051217DP_GC

...except that they take place in Switzerland, but not in Russia.

The right hidden from the people by the Vaudois and Swiss authorities is intended to violate Article 9 of the Federal Constitution. This right provides that :

(1) Privilege granted by Parliament to the Chairman of the Board of Directors, member of the Bar Association:

« It is enough for a President of the Board of Directors of a company that commits offences, and who is a member of the Bar, not to answer the summons of the Bar President until there is a prescription, to obtain that his offences cannot be investigated »

(2) The Council of State has the power to deprive a citizen of the right to be represented by his lawyer, where the citizen’s lawyer can prove the violation of Article 9 of the Federal Constitution by the legislator and the members of a criminal organization infiltrated into the State:

"It is enough for the elected members of the Council of State not to answer to the citizen’s lawyer, who says that he has the mandate to represent his client and who has given them proof that he had the citizen’s proxy to represent him,.... , so that the lawyer cannot represent his client"

"If the lawyer uses the Federal Court for violation of the right to represent his client, the elected representatives of Parliament have the power to ask the Federal Court to forbid the lawyer to be able to represent his client"

( As federal judges are not independent of the elected representatives of Parliament, they will deny the lawyer the right to represent his client, knowing that they intentionally violate the fundamental right of every citizen to be represented by a lawyer guaranteed by the ECHR and the Swiss Constitution)

These two procedures of the right hidden from the people, put in place by the legislator, violate Article 9 of the Federal Constitution. They violate in a crass way the fundamental rights of citizens guaranteed by the ECHR. This violation is done in full knowledge of the elected representatives of the Parliament and the Council of State who have established or use this hidden right to the people.

'This is the reason why the parties, which represent 5% of the population, do not want to propose candidates to be elected to the Parliament and the Council of State who undertake to ensure respect for the fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR. If such candidates could be elected, once elected, they would have to prohibit these procedures that discriminate against citizens in order to give advantages to elected party officials and members of a criminal organization infiltrated into the state.

It is the engine of institutionalized corruption that the authors of the “initiative for independent federal judges” wanted to break.

The members of the Federal Council know that it is enough for them not to answer the letters of a lawyer, who complains about not being able to represent his client, or to the letters of his client who complains that his lawyer was forbidden to represent him, so that this citizen no longer has any rights, like the Ukrainians who are killed by POUTINE has no longer any rights.

- Alain Berset knows that in 2016, a dissident lawyer said that he had no other solutions to propose to ensure respect for the rights guaranteed by the ECHR than to have a Federal Councillor shot down, when a citizen has been deprived of the right to be represented by his or her lawyer by the Federal Court

Alain BERSET knows that this dissident lawyer said that words are useless when governments do not respect human rights as POUTINE does, or as members of the Federal Council do by violating the fundamental rights of citizens guaranteed by the ECHR, including the right to be represented by a lawyer.

Me Jessica Jaccoud, Member of the Grand Council, a lawyer and a member of the Bar Association, is familiar with these procedures, which deprive a citizen of the right to be represented by a lawyer.

See exhibit 220321DE_JJ

then exhibit 220331DE_JJ

then exhibit 220401DE_JJ

She has the courtesy to reply to letters, but she does not propose any solutions other than those of the dissident lawyer, to respect the rights guaranteed by the ECHR of the citizen who has been deprived by the Parliament of the right to be represented by his lawyer..

See exhibit 220418DE_JJ

It is recalled that the dissident lawyer said that the words were no longer useful, when he announced that elected representatives of Parliament had decided to ask the Federal Court to deprive Dr. Erni of the right to be represented by his lawyer

At that time, he said that Switzerland needs a Maurice Bavaud who slaughters a Federal Councillor so that the rights guaranteed by the ECHR of 95% of the population are no longer violated by these candidates to be elected, forbidden to be able to enforce the rights guaranteed by the ECHR, and who are proposed by party members and current elected representatives, who represent only 5% of the population

Above all, this lawyer revealed the existence of this criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament which has implemented this right hidden from the people, which does not allow to elect magistrates who are enforcing the rights guaranteed by the ECHR.

OF MEDIA CENSORSHIP IN THESE FLAWED ELECTIONS

If the members of a criminal organization can impose the election of its candidates, with a right hidden from the majority of the people that does not allow them to enforce the rights guaranteed by the ECHR, democracy no longer exists.

(For those who doubt it, they must ask the RTS journalist, Philippe Revaz, to interview Me Christian BETTEX, State Lawyer, in the presence of Dr Erni who was deprived of the right to be represented by his lawyer by elected members of Parliament.

Philippe REVAZ will be able to explain to them that this is an interesting but taboo subject because these elected members of parliament were represented by Me Christian BETTEX to ask the Federal Court to deprive Dr Erni of the right to be represented by his lawyer, Me Schaller. Christian BETTEX accepted the mandate, while he and the elected officials knew that there was a conflict of interest with the Bar association)

It is emphasized here that these two citizens know each other very well:

For those who don’t know :

We have seen that Christian BETTEX is the prestigious lawyer hired by elected members of Parliament and those of the Council of State with the mandate to deprive Dr Erni of the right to be represented by Me Schaller.

CEveryone should know that Me Christian BETTEX is also the Bar President cited in the request for a parliamentary inquiry which forbade the key witness to testify. He has already shown that he has the competence to violate the fundamental rights of citizens guaranteed by the ECHR. He showed to the elected representatives that the President of the Tribunal, cited in the request for parliamentary inquiry, had his power reduced by the Bar association and that this judge, President of the Tribunal, refused to violate the ban made by himself, Me Christian BETTEX, that the key witness can testify.

The federal judges knew that this witness wanted to testify, but that the President of the Tribunal refused to lift the ban that Me Christian BETTEX had made him to be able to testify. Even more serious they know that Neuchâtel judges were convinced by Me Schaller that this ban on the witness to testify was an unlawful act. Schaller had shown that this illegal act had caused millions of damages.

To read again exhibit : 051217DP_GC

It is precisely at the moment when the Parliament and the Council of State must justify to Me Schaller the violation of the rights guaranteed by the ECHR, which was made by the Bar President, Me Christian BETTEX, with a right hidden from the people,…

..... that Christian BETTEX has been hired by Members of Parliament to ask the Federal Court to deprive Dr Erni of the right to be represented by Me Schaller.

Of course the federal judges could not refuse to Me Christian BETTEX this act of wrongfulness, as the President of the Tribunal, cited in the request for a parliamentary inquiry, could not refuse to Me Christian BETTEX the act of wrongness to forbid the key witness to testify, when he wanted to testify.

RTS knows much more, see exhibit 220330DE_PR

CHANGE IN THE SLOGAN OF ELECTED OFFICIALS SINCE 2015

On January 7, 2015, many elected officials said they wanted to enforce the ECHR with the slogan : JE SUIS CHARLIE

The change of the slogan of the elected officials since January 7, 2015:

Today, Swiss elected officials remain silent about the violation of the rights guaranteed by the ECHR. It violates the right of citizens to be represented by their lawyers. They hire attorneys general like Eric COTTIER who use procedures that do not exist, or Jean-Marc Schwenter and Michael LAUBER who hold hearings without minutes to violate the rights of the 95% of the population guaranteed by the ECHR.

See exhibit 020612DE_JS.

Young people must glue their hands on the highway to be heard

See exhibit : le matin / 11 avril 2022/ Les Bloqueures de l'Autoroute

The elected representatives, lawyers, can no longer defend the rights of the citizens of the people, deprived of the right to be represented by their lawyer by the State

see exhibit : 220321DE_IM

=> The slogan of the elected is no longer : JE SUIS CHARLIE

but he became de facto : I AM POUTINE

The Federal Councillor ALAIN BERSET has released his SLOGAN:

THREATS AND INSULTS, WE HAD TO ENDURE IT

with elected officials who say: I AM POUTINE......

.... Alain BERSET had to expect to be killed, except that since March 8, Ignazio CASSIS said he had become aware of the situation and that he said that the Federal Council is now on the side of justice and that he wants to sanction those who violate human rights.

Alain BERSET must have changed his SLOGAN WITH:

TO BE ON THE SIDE OF JUSTICE, TO PUNISH ELECTED PERSONS WHO VIOLATE THE RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE ECHR, ... I MUST NO LONGER RISK BEING KILLED BECAUSE MAGISTRATES VIOLATE THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE, IT IS THE DUTY OF THE FEDERAL COUNCIL TO PUNISH THEM AND ENSURE THAT THEY DO NOT USE OMERTA TO COVER ORGANIZED CRIME!!

Or simply :

NO VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 9, RESPECT FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, I NO LONGER ENDURE THREATS

This is not an April Fool’s Day : Alain BERSET put an end to the wearing of masks and he was outraged by those who threaten in Switzerland, when he was well protected by the State and could inform the people with the RTS when he wanted....

… especially Alain BERSET realized that he dared to take his car without strangers sabotaging his tires,….,  

...that he was not subjected to economic blackmail that he would be fired if he did not yield to the claims of those who threatened,…..,

... that the mass media made public the slightest threats he received,…..,  

...when he knows that other citizens who do not occupy his post, are not protected by the State and no longer have any rights when they are threatened by elected officials who are on the side of injustice….

...he even knows that elected officials, members of the Vaudois Council of State and the Vaudois Parliament, even deprive citizens of the right to be represented by their lawyer by the Federal Court, so that they no longer have any rights, which is much more serious than threats.

These are the methods worthy of his counterpart, Vladimir POUTINE

ALAIN BERSET
Federal councillor
One of POUTINE’s Counterparts for Switzerland

ALAIN BERSET discovered what it means to be on the side of injustice by risking nothing, and he said, quote:

Threats and insults, we had to endure this,

Since March 8, 2022, Alain BERSET has a new challenge with the Federal Council which has committed itself to no longer be on the side of injustice, but to be on the side of justice and to punish those who violate human rights whose rights guaranteed by the ECHR

Alain BERSET must punish those who corrupt the elections, those who censor the mass media. It must punish elected officials and officials who violate the rights of the people

lHe must condemn elected officials and magistrates who deprive citizens of the right to be represented by their lawyer

lHe must seize their property, their home to repair the damage done to the victims

These elected officials deserve death like the generals of his counterpart Putin who massacre the rights guaranteed by the ECHR of Ukrainians

Alain BERSET has lifted the censorship of the Médias :

The journalist Philippe REVAZ can and must inform the people that the elections of the Vaudois State Council are vitiated by officials surrounded by the State Council to violate the rights of voters guaranteed by the ECHR.

To read exhibit: 220330DE_PR

With its three annexes :

(1) The candidate for the Council of State, Isabelle Moret, explains why she cannot enforce the rights guaranteed by the ECHR,

see exhibit : 220323DE_PR

(2) The candidate Christelle Luisier Brodard can explain to the Council of State that it is important that the elections are suspended so as not to deceive voters,

see exhibit : 220328DE_CB

(3) The General Prosecutor of the Confederation, Stefan Blättler is aware of the way in which the members of the Council of State and the members of Parliament corrupt the elections

See exhibit : 220330DE_SB

The people must know that a criminal complaint has been filed with the General Prosecutor of the Confederation and that the Council of State has been asked to suspend these elections which are unfair and fraudulent

see exhibit: 220322DE_NG

Alain BERSET knows that other Swiss citizens not only have to endure threats and insults, but that their human rights are being violated like the one of the Ukrainians by state officials and elected officials who are on the side of injustic :

As his counterpart POUTINE inquires from his staff, Alain BERSET, asked his senior officials for information on the frightening practices testified by Swiss citizens in a request for a parliamentary inquiry.

See exhibit : 051217DP_GC

As the senior officials of his counterpart, POUTINE, inform him, the senior officials of the Federal Police of Alain BERSET, who protect him from the threats of the Swiss, has informed him correctly :

He knows that a dissident lawyer said that the Swiss needed a Maurice Bavaud who kills a Federal Councillor to put an end to the violation of the ECHR by the Federal Council, as an American Senator said that the Russians had to find a Brutus to kill his Counterpart POUTINE, to put an end to the violation of human rights guaranteed by the ECHR by POUTINE.

He knows that members of the Vaudois Parliament have promoted the President of the Tribunal, Bertrand SAUTEREL, to a senior official position, after that he said in the request for a parliamentary inquiry that he could not respect the ECHR and have to forbid Burnet unique witness of crime to testify.

He knows that Christian BETTEX, Jacques ANTENEN, Eric COTTIER, Philippe SCHWAB, Claude ROUILLER are like the loyal generals of his COUNTERPART POUTINE, they are civil servants, or people employed by the State, who do not hesitate to violate the rights of the Swiss as Jacques ANTENEN so well demonstrated, because they were chosen to be on the side of injustice

see exhibit 020616DE_JS

...Jacques ANTENEN as Michael LAUBER held secret hearings. They knew that a judge had introduced a witness who does not exist in an judgement to deprive Dr. Erni of the provisional measures, and they said that the hearing should remain secret and that they would do nothing......, after their decision to make this forfaiture act, there was the assassination of Pierre PENEL on the orders of Eric COTTIER,… , then economic blackmail with the terrible threats against Dr. Erni’s CEO, who was supposed to fire Dr. Erni if he did not give in to the blackmail exerted by Yves Burnand with his false denunciation.... , then the request for a parliamentary inquiry that showed the violation of the ECHR, .... , then Claude ROUILLER and Christian BETTEX, the super GENERALS of the Council of State and Parliament, called to the rescue to protect Jacques ANTENEN after his forfaiture act, by depriving Dr Erni of the right to be represented by his lawyer,....

For more details, to know the pedigree of these faithful GENERALS of members of the Parliament and the Council of the State of Vaud :

To read in particular the exhibit 220328DE_CB

Alain BERSET knows that the Média was censored and that he never talked about these practices that make you shudder. Now that the Federal Council is on the side of justice, the média must talk about it, as it talks about the violation of the ECHR by the GENERALS of POUTINE.

ALAIN BERSET must sanction these faithful GENERALS of the federal power including Me Christian BETTEX, the lawyer of the Vaudois Parliament and the Vaudois Council of State.

We remind that Me Bettex at the request of the Vaudois parliament requested from the Federal Court to deprive the Dr Erni to be represented by his lawyer. Alain Berset must particularly punish Claude ROUILLER who used his title of former President of the Federal Court to betray the Swiss

Since then, Alain BERSET knows that Dr Erni can no longer find lawyers to enforce his fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR,

See exhibit 220331DE_JJ

The elections of the Vaudois State Council must be suspended, as long as the candidates, proposed by the parties for becoming State Councillor, cannot be on the side of justice and cannot enforce the rights guaranteed by the ECHR. Similarly, Alain Berset must punish civil servants who violate the rights guaranteed by the Constitution with practices that make people shudder.

The mass media must break the OMERTA, now that the Federal Council claims to be on the side of justice.

« by allowing the Federal Court to deprive a citizen of the right to be defended by his lawyer in a dispute between him and the State »:

THE VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE ECHR BY VLADIMIR POUTINE CAUSES THE PRESIDENT OF THE CONFEDERATION TO CHANGE DIRECTION:

The latter, IGNAZIO CASSIS, committed to:

"Sanctioning those who violate international law and human rights guaranteed by the ECHR"

This decision taken with the principle of collegiality by the Federal Council puts an end to :

"the censorship of the Press on the violation of the rights guaranteed by the ECHR of the Swiss, deprived of the right to be defended by their lawyer by members of the State Councils and parliaments of the Cantons"

In particular, it directly concerns the members of the Parliament and the State Council of the Canton of Vaud as well as those of the Canton of Fribourg.

Me Isabelle MORET, former President of the Federal Assembly, is the right lawyer to obtain reparation by the State for the damage caused, in particular, by the Vaudois Council of State and the Vaudois Parliament, which are known to have violated the ECHR by depriving Dr Erni of the right to be defended by his lawyer in a dispute between him and the members of a criminal organization infiltrated into the state.

To read : 220310DE_IM

Isabelle MORET
National councillor
Former Parliament President Lawyer

As President of the Federal Assembly in 2019/2020, she knows the damage caused by the violation of the rights guaranteed by the ECHR, including that of being defended by her lawyer by members of a criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament.

NO ONE EXPECTED THE PRESIDENT OF THE CONFEDERATION, IGNAZIO CASSIS, TO CHANGE DIRECTION IN THE FACE OF THE VIOLATION OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE ECHR BY VLADIMIR POUTINE

Journalists have forgotten that Ignazio Cassis is a doctor. In his profession, ethics is guided by the Hippocratic Oath.

It is a profession where censorship and manipulation of facts is neither tolerable nor acceptable, nor censorship of mass media to cover the behavior of sworn magistrates who abuse their power, ....

.....as did Jacques Antenen, Eric COTTIER, Judge Treccani, ..... Michael LAUBER, with secret hearings and no Minutes or  secret Minutes to violate the rights guaranteed by the ECHR by deceiving our people.

By wanting those who violate fundamental rights to be sanctioned publicly, Ignazio CASSIS has been faithful to the Values of his profession, who respect the ECHR and he put an end to the censorship of the mass media by even giving the example that we do not have the right to leave those who have too much power to violate the ECHR, without sanctioning them !

For the mass media, the following document recalls the importance of being on the side of justice and of publicly sanctioning sworn magistrates who violate the ECHR, as the President of the Confederation has undertaken to do, to read :

Exhibit Nr 220315DE_IG :

OPEN LETTER TO SWISS MASS MEDIA JOURNALISTS
AND HAS THE RIGHT TO

We remind here the President of Confederation’s approach with Poutine, as Isabelle MORET will also have to apply it to enforce the ECHR, following the fact that members of the Vaud State Council, with parliamentarians, who were assisted by Christian BETTEX, violate Human Rights by obtaining from the Federal Court that it denied Dr.Erni the right to be represented by his lawyer.

Me Isabelle MORET knows that Dr Erni does not find a lawyer to enforce his fundamental rights before independent Courts, since Parliamentarians have deprived him of this right....

....... to observe that since March 8, 2022, she has the support of the Federal Council, which has pledged to enforce the ECHR,....

...she can have also the support of mass media that are no longer censored,...

...she also has Professor Riklin’s expertise on the minutes of Judge Treccani’s secret hearing with 4M. She knows that the Court of Lausanne sent the file to the Registry of the Tribunal of Neuchâtel with prohibition to Dr Erni’s lawyer to copy it so that the existence of the secret minutes could not be proved, etc.

See exhibit 220310DE_IM

She has the minutes of the secret hearing of General Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter with the Chief of Judges Jacques ANTENEN, where Dr.Erni was deprived of the right to be assisted by the legal professional who accompanied him,..

See exhibit 020612DE_JS.

She has the knowledge and competence to enforce the ECHR as a lawyer and former President of the Federal Assembly

She should also have the support of the General Prosecutor of Confederation, who knows how Michael Lauber’s hearings work without minutes, see Exhibit 220311DE_SB .

To enforce the rights guaranteed by the ECHR, she knows that the President of the Vaudois State Council is aware of the situation :

See exhibit 220313D_NG

and that the President of the State Council of Fribourg is also aware of the situation, see exhibit: 220313DE_OC

220315DE_IG

220310DE_IM

After the Federal Council, which has shown that it no longer wants to respect for every citizen the fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR, by allowing the Federal Court to deprive them of the right to be defended by their lawyer, .,....

Vladimir Poutine

….it is Vladimir Poutine who is violating human rights on a large scale by showing that if he applies the rule of the Federal Council that:

« words no longer serve any purpose in upholding fundamental rights»,

....then he can massacre thousands of civilians without any legitimacy with impunity.

.....Even if we are not on the borders of Ukraine, we must not forget that in Switzerland, our senior leaders do not respect the Values of Life any more than Vladimir Putin, as our oligarchs show.... including prestigious judges, above all suspicion, such as Michael LAUBER, Jacques ANTENEN, Eric COTTIER, .... , which create a climate of terror with actions violating human rights, about which journalists dare not speak, such as the content of secret interviews of a Jacques ANTENEN that serve to violate the rights of citizens to cover the crimes of members of a criminal organization, etc,....

Hearings Minutes of June 12 2002

* * *

IMPORTANT COMMENT ON THE ELECTION OF DEPUTIES AND MAGISTRATES

TAs long as we elect deputies and magistrates who are not obliged to undertake to respect the ECHR in order to be elected,….. and that they cannot be dismissed immediately if they violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR, because they are protected by their immunity, ,....

.... words are no longer used to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR, as Vladimir Poutine shows…..

EXAMPLES OF SIMILARITY:

1. Violation of international treaties that guarantee human rights and the fundamental principles of peace and security, including the ECHR, by affirming the contrary

Vladimir Poutine has just violated the fundamental rights of thousands of Ukrainians guaranteed by the ECHR by attacking and killing themt.

In 2006, Alexander Litvinenko was murdered by poisoning. The ECHR considers that V. Poutine probably approved this assassination for which the Russian authorities had refused to provide the documents required by the ECHR..

The Federal Council ... also violates the ECHR by not providing access to independent courts and by surrounding itself with oligarchs, such as Patrick FOETISCH, Christian BETTEX, Michael LAUBER, Jacques ANTENEN, Eric COTTIER, etc.. and by allowing federal judges to deprive Swiss citizens of the right to be represented by their lawyers.

In 2003, Pierre PENEL, Foetisch’s right-hand man, was murdered by poisoning according to a fellow lawyer of Foetisch. The latter considers that it is the magistrate Eric COTTIER who gave the order to make disappear Pierre PENEL to obscure the violation of the rights guaranteed by the ECHR by magistrates with the practices, that make shudder, described by the testimony of an elite of citizens in the request for a parliamentary inquiry: 051217DP_GC

2. Censorship of the Press and misinformation of the people on the violation of the human rights guaranteed by the ECHR made by the «oligarchs» of the Federal Council as Vladimir POUTINE does by saying the contrary of facts which can be observed

Vladimir Poutine deceives the people about the facts that can be observed:  he took control of the information by destroying the communication antennas including that of the television. He reverses the facts by telling his people that they are being attacked by pro-Nazi Ukrainians

The observation of satellite images and the listening of testimonies on the spot show that it is indeed V. Poutine with his oligarchs who violate fundamental rights

The Federal Council deceives the people on the facts that can be observed :  it claims not to violate the fundamental rights of citizens guaranteed by the ECHR, on the one hand by censoring the Press by its oligarchs, on the other hand, by imposing the law of silence on the practices - which make people shudder - that its oligarch magistrates use to violate fundamental rights.

Observation of the facts by legal experts and witnesses on the spot shows that it is indeed the contrary :

The members of the Federal Council know that they are violating access to independent tribunals guaranteed by the ECHR and the fundamental rights of the people guaranteed by the ECHR in an unimaginable way, as these documents, which they know, show for example:

(a) The minutes of the June 2002 secret interview with General Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter, supervised by Jacques Antenen, an oligarch above all suspicion

Minutes of the hearing of 12 June 2002

(b) the public testimony in 2005 which revealed the violation of the rights guaranteed by the ECHR by the Swiss authorities.

051217DP_GC

WHAT SOLUTION COULD BE PROVIDED BY COUNSEL ISABELLE MORET?

Senior Lawyer Isabelle MORET was President of the Federal Assembly. She knows in detail the  practices, that make you shudder, described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry.

She knows that the Federal Council is violating the ECHR by not providing access to independent Courts. She knows that this fact was established by Me de Rougemont, an expert appointed by the Vaudois Parliament.

She knows that Dr Erni was denied the right to be represented by his lawyer, a measure worthy of the HITLER Courts. She knows that Dr ERNI, does not find lawyers to enforce his fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR since the State deprived him of being represented by his lawyer.

She knows that Dr ERNI had the idea of asking her to respect his fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR, because she has the right profile to do so….

She has all the powers to obtain from our senior leaders and elected officials that they no longer violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR by showing that it is intolerable that the Federal Council violated the ECHR by allowing the Federal Court to deprive a citizen of right to be defended by his lawyer.

lShe can and must set an example by defending the rights of this citizen who cannot find a lawyer to enforce his fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR

To discover in the exhibit below, this commitment that was asked from her on February 18, 2022, and which is even more important, since V. Poutine showed the true meaning of the words of Foetisch fellow lawyer: "Words no longer serve anything",....

Commitment requested from Isabelle MORET : 220218DE_IM.

Jacques ANTENEN, the Chief of the Vaud Police, is leaving, while he could have been the  Super Hero of the new version of the film :

« investigation of a citizen above all suspicion »

of Elio PETRI

Sylvie Bula will replace Jacques Antenen,

to read :

RTS info du 9 février 2022

Jacques Antenen
Chief of the Vaud Police

An actor even more smiling than the citizen above all suspicion, Chief of Police, in the film of Elio PETRI

To honour at its fair value, the departure of Jacques Antenen, this prestigious inventor of secret hearings without minutes, who was the chief of the Vaud police,..., the Vaudois Public Prosecutor’s Office opened its archives when Jacques ANTENEN was the Head of Justice who supervised the activities of General Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter and the work of the judges..

For this departure out of the norm, the Public Prosecutor’s Office has released an exceptional document that describes one of these famous secret hearings without minutes, where the Vaudois litigants discovered how the General Prosecutor, chosen by Parliament, with the Chief of Justice, were financed by their taxes...

... to deprive them of the right to be assisted by a legal professional

To discover here, the minutes of the secret hearing of June 12, 2002, where Jacques Antenen, the head of justice who supervised the work of the judges, and the activities of the General  Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter with the support of two policemen enforced the Values of the Swiss Constitution .

Minutes of secret hearing of 12 june 2002

TIMES HAVE CHANGED SINCE 2002 AS Michael LAUBER, THE SPIRITUAL SON of Jacques ANTENEN, HAS SHOWN IT

Although Michael LAUBER may be very proud of his spiritual father, in 2016, an experienced lawyer quoted the minutes of secret earing of 12 June 2002 to say that Jacques Antenen and Jean-Marc Schwenter violated the rights guaranteed by the ECHR:

"According to this lawyer, Jean-Marc Schwenter and Jacques Antenen did not have the right to hold secret hearings without minutes, where they deprived litigants of the right to be represented by legal professionals who advised them."

*He cited them as members of a criminal organization infiltrated into the state that violated the fundamental rights of litigants."

In 2020, there was a lot of talk about Michael LAUBER, the prodigy spiritual son of Jacques ANTENEN who discredited the entire judicial system with his secret hearings without minutes. At that time the Vaudois Public Prosecutor had not claimed for Jacques ANTENEN the parternity of these secret hearingss.

Thank you to the Vaudois Public Prosecutor for having made this correction and released this exceptional document to welcome the departure of this citizen above all suspicion that was Jacques Antenen, who supervised the activities of the Prosecutor Schwenter and the work of the judgess

After the pandemic, it is time for the Federal Council and the new General Prosecutor of Confederation to take action to protect litigants who have been denied the right to be defended by their lawyers by members of this prestigious criminal organization and this citizen above all suspicion

To read : 220215DE_TB

220215DE_TB

12 juin 2002

Everyone remembers that the General Prosecutor Eric COTTIER was the subject of a complaint to the Vaudois Parliament to cover organized crime with a procedure that did not exist according to a lawyer of the CAP, to read in the mail below point 8 page 2.

210622DE_GC

He was even asked to resign because he did not respect the separation of powers, as established by Me François de Rougemont, an expert on Parliament. Read the letter below on page 4, item 2.

210616DE_EC

General Prosecutor Eric COTTIER

To discover his pathetic discourse fatal to the rights of future generationss:

RTS, TJ 19h30 du 01.02.2022

To discover the column of the deputy Jessica JACCOUD  :

Forum RTS of 1st february 2021

To discover the distress of the younger generations who are being harassed by this General Prosecutor who has forgotten what is the Spirit of Laws, and that his primary role is to protect Life on our planet,

RTS 24 Janvier 2022.....

....., a, instead of covering up organized crime, with procedures that do not exist, such as the one described in the open letter where he was asked to resign. To read in the letter below point 7

210616DE_EC

It should be noted that the General Prosecutor Eric COTTIER and all the members of the Vaudois Parliament know the above letter sent to them with the letter of 22 June 20211.

It is pathetic that this General Prosecutor wrote to the Vaudois Parliament complaining that a young member of Parliament defended the Values of Life by applying three Einstein guidelines :

« Those who have the privilege of knowing, have the duty to act »

« The world cannot be changed without changing our thinking »

" The world is dangerous to live not so much because of those who do evil, but because of those who watch and let go. "

....To discover the opinion of Baptiste Hurni, National Councillor (Ps-NE), member of the Legal Affairs Committee of the National Councill

LeTemps.ch : Eric Cottier Case: «Do as I say, but not as I do»

OPINION. To complain of intolerable interference when we are doing exactly the same thing in a more organized and systematic way is an unbearable lightness, writes Baptiste Hurni, National Councillor (NHP) and lawyer, member of the Legal Affairs Committee of the National Council

It is reminded that this pathetic Prosecutor is involved in professional blackmail with a slanderous denunciation, where he protected the members of a criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament, see Exhibit CEDH2021_11.

........ where he used his procedure which did not exist to cover an assassination, and a state crime according to an informed lawyer.

A lire : 220117DE_IC

Ignazio CASSIS
President of the Confederation
Physician

Namely that in 2016, a dissident lawyer announced to Dr Erni that Vaudois parliamentarians asked the Federal Court to deprive him of the right to be represented by his lawyer Me Rudolf Schaller

The reason was that Mr. Schaller said he could prove that Dr. Erni was victim of a permanent denial of justice…… with the crimes committed with the interventions of the Bar Presidents,……

The Federal Council did not enforce the ECHR by the Federal Court

IMPORTANT FACT :

The President of the Confederation, Ignazio CASSIS, was not yet a federal councillor, when the Federal Council did not enforce the ECHR in the Federal Court.

ABOUT HIS VALUES AS A PHYSICIANN

Ignazio CASSIS is the only doctor of the Federal Council, he knows the Values of the Hippocratic Oath,.......

....he has the competence to enforce the ECHR by the Federal Council with its training as a doctor....

To follow...

OBJECTIVES 2022

MISSION OF THE PEOPLE FOR :

Stefan Blättler
New General Prosecutor of Confederation

END COURT CONTROL BY CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION INFILTRATED INTO PARLIAMENT TO END INSTITUTIONALIZED CORRUPTION

This General Prosecutor has an undeniable advantage, he knows that the President of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers revealed that Foetisch committed his crimes when he was not a member of the Bar Associations

He knows that Foetisch has been protected by the Bar Presidents like Philippe BAUER, Philippe RICHARD, Christian BETTEX, with a right that does not exist..... and that Alain BERSET knows this following an investigation he had made to the Federal Police,.....

WELCOME TO STEFAN BLÄTTLER

This new General Prosecutor of the Confederation was presented by the members of Parliament as a  General Prosecutor who upholds the fundamental rights of the people..... while Members of Parliament do not!

He has a difficult challenge: He will have to show that he shares the values of the people enshrined in the Federal Constitution, while Michael LAUBER with his Staff served the interests of the criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament.

This General Prosecutor will discover the institutionalized corruption with the frightening testimonies of Swiss who have shown that citizens no longer dare to speak of fear of blackmail and economic damage exercised by members of Parliament who censor the Press. He’s gonna find out how federal judges are violating citizens' fundamental rights

He will have to find solutions to put an end to the chilling practices described by an elite of the people in the request for a parliamentary inquiry, see exhibit 051217DP_GC

He will have to take steps to neutralize and convict those who stifle the people for fear with the law of silence as shown in this recording taken by a private detective, where a CEO is forced to dismiss a director after the magistrate of the Canton of Vaud, Eric Cottier, had Pierre Penel murdered

Extract Exhibit 11 (requête CEDH2021)

He must apply the motto of EINSTEIN :

Those who have the privilege of knowing, have the duty to act !

This Attorney General must have exemplary condemnation of members of the criminal organization infiltrated into the state who use the threat of dismissal to deceive the people and create a climate of terror. He will have to put an end to the actions of General Prosecutor like Eric COTTIER who use their power as General Prosecutor to prevent the investigation of crimes of which they are the perpetrators. We recall here the example of the murder of Pierre PENEL that Eric COTTIER himself commissioned according to a lawyer who revealed the existence of this criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament.

2022

HAPPY NEW YEAR

BEST OF HEALTH WISHES TO ALL OUR READERS

31.12.21

REVIEW OF THE YEAR 2021

THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OF CONFEDERATION IS BEHEADED :

The General Prosecutor of the Confederation, Michael LAUBER, has discredited the entire judicial system set up by Parliament, he must resign.

This is only the tip of the Iceberg, an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, who investigates the behavior of one of Michael LAUBER’s deputies, reports state corruption

JACQUES RAYROUD
Deputy Prosecutor of Michael LAUBER,

With

RUEDI MONTANARI,
Deputy Prosecutor of Michael LAUBER

... are involved in state corruption

* * *

NEW FACT REVEALED BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE SWISS FEDERATION OF LAWYERS

(read opposite)

Me Birgit Sambeth GLASNER
President of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers

INTERVENTION BY ALAIN BERSET:

COUNCILLOR FÉDÉRAL ALAIN BERSET KNOWS THAT THERE IS A CLAIM FOR COMPENSATION OF THE DAMAGE CAUSED WITHOUT RIGHT TO THE FEDERAL COUNCIL:

HE ASKED FOR CLARIFICATION ON THE FEDERAL POLICE CASE.

HE WILL KNOW THE DETAILS WHICH WILL BE COMMUNICATED BY THE EUROPEAN SUPERVISORY AUTHORITIES AND TO THE NEW ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE CONFEDERATION.

HE WILL BE INFORMED OF THE SWISS FEDERATION OF LAWYERS PRESIDENT’S REVELATIONS

LAUBER CASE REVEALED THE EXISTENCE OF AN UNDERCOVER CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION IN THE STATE THAT CONTROLS THE COURTS

Jean-Bernard Schmid, an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor in charge of investigating the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR by the General Staff of Michael LAUBER reports state corruption.

His investigation concerns the crimes committed with the injunctions of the Bar Presidents, and former Bar Presidents of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers described in the request for parliamentary investigation of 17.12.2005.

It is recalled that this request for a parliamentary inquiry was made by an elite of citizens who announced that they witnessed the violation of rights guaranteed by the ECHR. In this request for a parliamentary inquiry, Dr ERNI was defended by Mr Rudolf SCHALLER.

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

He knows that the federal judges then deprived Me Schaller of the right to represent Dr.ERNI at the request of the Parliament of Vaud represented by Me Christian BETTEX.

He knows that Mr. Christian BETTEX is the President of the Bar mentioned in the request for a parliamentary inquiry that had prohibited Mr. Burnet from testifying.

He also knows that Patrick Foetisch may have committed crimes as a result of the actions of President Richard, also cited in the request for a parliamentary inquiry, which had prohibited Foetisch from being the subject of a criminal complaint for these crimes which are recognized as criminal offences.

He knows that Jacques RAYROUD and Ruedi MONTANARI covered the crimes of Foetisch and violated the rights guaranteed by the ECHR of Dr Erni to have access to independent Courts, on the ground that Foetisch was a member of the Order of Lawyers.

Jean Bernard SCHMID will then clarify that he saw state corruption in the file. He says that Dr Erni cannot defend himself without a lawyer, while the state has deprived him of the right to be represented by his lawyer.t.

* * *

ME BIRGIT SAMBETH GLASNER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE CONTENT OF THE ENTIRE FILE

Dr ERNI asked her to find him a lawyer to enforce his fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR, following the fact that Mr Christian BETTEX, a member of the FSA, acting on behalf of the Parliament had deprived Dr ERNI of the right to be represented by his lawyer.

Me BIRGIT SAMBETH GLASNER THEN REVEALED THAT FOETISCH WAS NOT A MEMBER OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION WHEN HE WAS PROTECTED BY THE SWISS FEDERATION OF LAWYERS :

THIS IS A HUGE CASE OF STATE CORRUPTION UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF THE CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION INFILTRATED INTO PARLIAMENT!

INTERVENTION BY A DISSIDENT LAWYER:

Aware of the same facts as Me Birgit Sambeth Glasner,...

...in 2016, a dissident lawyer said that words were no longer useful.

He had revealed the existence of this criminal organization infiltrated into the state, on which the federal judges depend. He said that our people needed a Maurice BAVAUD who kills a Federal Councillor to put an end to this state corruption. .

* * *

THANKS

A BIG THANK YOU TO ALL THOSE WHO MAKE VISIBLE THIS INSTITUTIONALIZED CORRUPTION IN SWITZERLAND BY RESISTING TO THE CENSORSHIP, DESPITE THE THREATS AND ECONOMIC DAMAGE THEY FACE FROM THE MEMBERS OF THIS CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION INFILTRATED INTO THE STATE.

Citation :

« The world cannot be changed without changing our thinking »

Mission of Me Maurice ROPRAZ

(To be informed beforehand of all the documents appearing on the following internet link:

Chronological follow up

....for details)

All the members of the State Council of Fribourg, those of the State Council of the Canton of Vaud, and those of the Federal Council belong to the 5% of our people who are affiliated to a political party.

They know the procedures used by the courts to violate the fundamental rights of the 95% of citizens of our people who are not affiliated with a political party.

They can no longer ignore the fact that the President of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers, Me Birgit Sambeth Glasner, revealed that :

Patrick Foetisch, quoted in the request for a parliamentary inquiry ,...

...was not a member of the Bar Association,...

... although he was protected by the Presidents of the Bar Association and members of the Swiss Federation Lawyers as Me Christian BETTEX, Me Philippe BAUER, etc....

To read exhibit : 051217DP_GC

This statement of Me Birgit Sambeth Glasner allows to understand why the General Procureur Eric COTTIER has made murdered Pierre PENEL and why a lawyer wants to kill a federal Councillor.

The members of the State Council of Fribourg gave the mission to Me Maurice ROPRAZ to explain these discriminations put in place by the 5% of citizens associated with political parties, who use the interventions of the Bar Presidents to violate the rights of the people and the Values of life.

Me Maurice ROPRAZ must take the measures to put an end to these discriminations.

THE MISSION To
Me Maurice ROPRAZ

To read : 211221DE_MR

Changing our thinking :  The Historian’s Lesson

Historians have shown that it was enough for Hitler with the 3rd REICH to put at the entrance of the Auschwitz Camp a sign with the mention «Arbeit Macht Frei» and to have courts that were under the control of a criminal organization infiltrated into the state so that a minority of citizens would massacre the fundamental rights of a majority of citizens by decimating their families and violating the Values of Life with practices that would terrify you.

It is not because the high authorities of a country have the Press film the sign "Arbeit Macht Frei", rather than have them film the gas chambers of the camp with thousands of corpses, that these corpses do not exist

In Switzerland, it is not because the Federal Council hides from the people that federal judges can deprive a citizen of being represented by his lawyer,... that citizens have not been deprived of the right to be represented by their lawyer as Me Maurice ROPRAZ knows

Citation :

" The world is dangerous to live not so much because of those who do evil, but because of those who watch and let go. "

Particularity of the Values of the 5% of citizens affiliated to a political party

They all know that the General Prosecutor Eric COTTIER ordered the assassination of Pierre PENEL to cover the crimes committed with the interventions of the Bar Presidents. They know that this prosecutor is decimating families by violating the Values of Life with the protection of federal judges

They are all aware of the blackmail exercised on a CEO to force him to dismiss a Director if the latter did not yield to the demands of Yves Burnand.

For reminder : read exhibit : Extract Exhibit 11 (requête CEDH2021)

They know that nothing will stop the crimes committed by members of this criminal organization if they do not act.

They all know that a senior lawyer said that words are no longer useful and that a federal councillor must be shot to force judges to enforce fundamental rights in their decisions.

They all know that this lawyer, a colleague of Senator Philippe BAUER, has claimed that Foetisch is high up in a criminal organization infiltrated into the parliaments that control the courts. They all know that parliamentarians have provided that federal judges can deprive a citizen of legal representation.... to cover assassination and coercion by a criminal organization on a CEO, etc..

All colleagues of Me Maurice ROPRAZ of the Council of State asked him to answer the questions raised by the violation of the rights guaranteed by the ECHR described in the request for parliamentary investigation.

All colleagues of Me Maurice ROPRAZ watch the Courts violating the fundamental rights of the people and let it happen. They make believe to the 95% of the People that Courts respect the Constitution, knowing that the proof to the contrary was brought by the assassination of Pierre PENEL and the violation of human rights applied by a criminal organization infiltrated in the State.

Changing our thinking based on past experiences

Me Maurice ROPRAZ knows how the General Prosecutor Eric COTTIER was responsible for murdering Pierre PENEL.

He knows how the Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA, Me Patrick FOETISCH, uses the interventions of the Bar Presidents to commit crimes with impunity, while he is not a member of the Order of Lawyers according to the President of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers.

He knows how the 5% of citizens affiliated to a political party massacre the fundamental rights of other citizens. He knows that these citizens represent 95% of the people and they demand respect for their rights guaranteed by the Constitution without having to be affiliated with a political party.

He knows how HITLER decimated entire families by violating access to independent courts and denying citizens the right to be represented by independent lawyers with similar procedures.

He knows that the members of the Vaud Parliament have deprived a physicist of the right to be represented by his lawyer so that the State of Fribourg can violate his fundamental rights.

As an experienced lawyer, he knows that the practice of depriving a citizen of the right to be represented by his lawyer can only be the act of a criminal organization infiltrated into the state.

He knows that a shaman predicted the facts that are coming today. He knows that he must answer the questions:

1) Why was I born? 2) What is my destiny? ,...

The danger of the viral weapon (covid-19) if Me Maurice ROPRAZ does not put an end to the crimes committed by the criminal organization infiltrated in the state

He knows that criminal organizations that develop Viruses, Variants and anti-viruses do it to enslave the world. This is the rule of 3 A. (Weaken, Impoverish and Subjugate))

Among other things, there are projects that aim to reduce the global population selectively to reduce global warming.

For this, all citizens must have received a "vaccine" (Trojan Horse) to be traced in a completely connected world and thus be selectively eliminated.

He knows that if the Courts have to obey the members of a criminal organization;… if the legislator and the Councils of State allow the members of this criminal organization to violate the rights of citizens by depriving them of the right to be represented by a lawyer and by using the methods described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry,…if the legislator elects a General Prosecutor like Eric COTTIER, (or Michael LAUBER as other example), to cover the crimes committed by the criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament, ...

……tomorrow the members of the criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament will theoretically be able to reduce the 95% of the Swiss population that is not affiliated to a political party by eliminating them with the Trojan horses, which can be the antivirus in the hand of a criminal organization infiltrated in the Parliament,...

....... , but the families of the magistrates will also be decimated by resistance groups, as has already been announced by a lawyer who wants to have a Federal Councillor killed.

..... It is also a biblical prophecy that the children, of those who violate human rights, will die,....

..... if the Authorities do not end the violation of the rights of the people !

This is the full scope of this mission given to him by his colleagues in the Council of State

to reread exhibit : 211221DE_MR

and the exhibit : 2021_CEDH

Protect your children, don’t vaccinate them against Covid-19, but respect the Values of Life

In 2001, a Shaman said that we should ask our senior leaders the following questions :

"Why were you born? , What is your destiny?"

These questions were among others ask to the Minister Simonetta Sommaruga

The Shaman told a physicist that:

"your destiny will lead you to have to unmask state leaders who violate the Values of Life and to have to bring about change. You will be supported in this fight by unexpected forces."

See Exhibit : 161010DE_SS

THE DISSIDENT LAWYER

The letter addressed to Ms Simonetta Sommaruga also refers to the dissident lawyer.

This lawyer is:

a confrere to Me Christian BETTEX and a confrere to the members of the FSA.

This lawyer decided to break the silence on the criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament that violates the Values of Life with the rule of 3 A, ...

...by announcing that the Federal Court would deprive this physicist of the right to be defended by his lawyer...

...We went back to the time of the 3rd REICH with HITLER who deprived citizens of access to independent courts in the aim to dominate the world...,

this time it is the members of a criminal organization infiltrated into parliaments who want to dominate the world.

They have at their disposal the viral weapon (covid-19) with the anti-viral technologies that make it possible to put under control all humanity...

* * *

Reminder :

In the 1980s, scientists believed that in the future, chips could be implanted in all humans.

These chips would be used to trace them and enslave them or destroy them in a targeted way with robot weapons.

Mobile phones already have that function, but you can get rid of it if a criminal organization uses it to dominate the world. This is no longer the case with Trojan horses introduced with vaccines.

* * *

You don’t stop a pandemic by vaccinating children who are protected by their immune system, but you prolong it by preventing their immune system from developing. On the contrary, they are weakened and children are put under the control of a criminal organization that applies the 3A rule: weaken, impoverish and subjugate

Christmas is the feast of the birth of a Lord who protects children. He gave them a very powerful immune system that protects them by teaching them to defend themselves without a "vaccine". For children, the vaccine is a Trojan horse that inhibits the learning power of their immune system. It makes their immune system less resistant to future variants, it will make children dependent on industries that have an interest in making this virus and future variants exist.

Covid-19 is an unexpected force that shows our leaders can no longer turn a blind eye to institutionalized corruption.

They must answer the question :

"Why were you born? , What is your destiny?"

They must explain to the people why a dissident lawyer sounded the alarm and said :

"Words no longer serve any purpose, It is necessary to shoot down a Federal Councillor to restore respect for fundamental rights"

see point 3 on page 4 of the Exhibit :161010DE_SS

IN 1939, TO DOMINATE THE WORLD, HITLER AND THE THIRD REICH HAD ATOMIC WEAPON TECHNOLOGY AND THE CONTROL OF THE COURTSX

Albert Einstein warned President Roosevelt about the risk of nuclear weapons.

The war killed 60 million people … with a Hitler who did not have time to use atomic weapon technology to dominate the world.

The atomic weapon, unlike the viral weapon, does not act in two stages, it did not allow to put under control all humanity.

We recall that the interest of a viral weapon is initially to be able to spread in a population to mark it and then to administer an antivirus, which is a foreign body that allows to control the population or even enslave it.

Antiviral technologies, including anti-viruses, which are Trojan horses, are generally developed by those who developed the viruses.

In order for these technologies to be able to enslave humanity by the members of criminal organizations, there are two conditions to be fulfilled :

CONDITION #1: The Courts must not enforce human rights. They must not be independent, but be under the control of members of a criminal organization infiltrated into the state (condition already respected in Switzerland)

For parents who doubt it, to discover on the internet link of this page, the motives that led a dissident lawyer to say that our Authorities no longer want to enforce the fundamental rights of the people and that words no longer serve any purpose!

CONDITION #2: Children must be treated with these Trojans when they do not need them, as this vaccine is an ideal carrier of robot weapons, like nano-implants to enslave every citizen in a fully connected world.

Personne n'avait imaginé qu'un HITLER pourrait inventer des chambres à gaz pour éliminer une partie de l'humanité, avec la mention trompeuse à l'entrée D'auschwitz : "ARBEIT MACHT FREI"

No one could have imagined that a General Prosecutor, like Eric COTTIER, would say that if he sends an A mail to a defendant, which probably does not exist, then according to him, he has the formal proof that the defendant received the mail A, if the mail Office did not return to him the mail A

No one could have imagined that : the Federal Court cleverly ruled in his favour to cover up the actions of a criminal organization infiltrated into the state, and that the Vaudois parliamentarians observed the LAW OF SILENCE, whereas a lawyer from CAP Insurance had said that this procedure described by this Prosecutor did not exist.

Observation

In the 1980s, scientists believed that one day, we would have undetectable weapons (Trojans) in integrated circuits that would work with the principle of programmable obsolescence.

In a world which is completely connected, with courts serving the members of a criminal organization...those who have the privilege of knowing have a duty to act to change course and protect future generations, including childrens.

To read the following exhibit :

950109LG_DE

This exhibit shows that the Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA (Interactive Comm. SA), whose name was : Patrick Foetisch, was indeed a member of the BAR ASSOCIATION, in the case described by the request for a parliamentary inquiry, ……

However, according to the sources of the President of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers, Me Patrick Foetisch was not a member of the Bar Association in the case described by the request for a parliamentary inquiry,…

To read the following exhibit :

211022SB_DE

Who had an interest in deceiving the President of the FSA to cover an assassination and the violation of fundamental rights by members of the FSA, like Me Christian BETTEX, Me Philippe BAUER, Me Lucien GANI, etc... c... ?

To read the following exhibit:

211215DE_BS

Who are the sources of the President of the FSA, knowing that Pierre PENEL, quoted in this letter was murdered, that the federal police - at the request of Alain Berset - has investigated this case and that a request for a parliamentary investigation has been filed by an elite of citizens to clarify the behaviour of the Bar Presidents, members of the BAR ASSOCIATION, who make shudder in this case ?

To read the following exhibit :

051217DP_GC

Is It :  Me Claude ROUILLER,  Me Christian BETTEX, Me Philippe BAUER, the jurist Philippe SCHWAB, Me Maurice ROPRAZ, Alain BERSET, ??? etc.

SEVERAL LAW PROFESSIONALS, WHO HAD THE PRIVILEGE OF KNOWING, RESPECTED THEIR DUTY TO ACT

Among them, there is   Me Jean-Paul Maire, member of the BAR ASSOCIATION, who showed that Me Birgit SAMBETH GLASNER was deceived,

The latter did not violate the rules of good faith by applying the law of silence, he answered the questions put to him. Unlike those who deceived the President of the FSA, he confirmed that Patrick Foetisch was member of the BAR ASSOCIATION when he committed his crimes..

to read point 3.2, page 3 of the following exhibit:

211207DE_BS

SEVERAL CITIZENS WHO HAD FOUND THAT THE COURTS HAD VIOLATED FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS RESPECTED THEIR DUTY TO ACT

They are, in particular, the authors of the request for a parliamentary inquiry. Unlike those who deceived the President of the FSA, they confirmed that Patrick Foetisch was a member of the  BAR ASSOCIATION Lawyers when he committed his crimes..

051217DP_GC

A LEGAL PROFESSIONAL, WHO MADE HIMSELF KNOWN AFTER THE FACTS REVEALED AT THE MBA-HEC CONFERENCE IN 2010, RESPECTED HIS DUTY TO ACT

He revealed the existence of a criminal organization infiltrated into the parliaments, where Me FOETISCH was in a high position, which explained all the dysfunction of the Swiss justice and the killing of Zug.

Contrary to those who deceived the President of the FSA, he confirmed that Me Patrick Foetisch was a member of the BAR ASSOCIATION when he committed his crimes, while giving a clue that suggests that the President of the FSA would have been deceived in a clever way, but he didn’t want to say more for ethical reasons.

to read point 3.2, page 3 of the following exhibit :

211207DE_BS

He did his duty to act by proposing to have a Federal Councillor killed for CHF 25,000CHF, by comparing the functioning of the Swiss justice system to that of Hitler and by announcing that the Parliament of Vaud was going to have Mr.Schaller banned by federal judges from being able to represent his client, Dr. Erni.

The facts proved him right, as all those who exercise the law of silence can confirm

So, who deceived the President of the FSA?

and who violated his duty to act in the face of the assassination of P. PENEL ?

In the last resort, was it the Federal Council or Alain BERSET who had the federal police investigate? ?

It is necessary that Me BIRGIT SAMBETH GLASNER communicates his sources to know who deceived her !!!

"institutionalized corruption"

FIRST BREAK OF THE LAW OF SILENCE!

The cantonal judge Dina BETI did not dare to tell the Federal Council that it violated the fundamental rights of the people, but she wrote it and its message is without appeal:

LJudge Dina BETI refused in writing to give discharge to Judge Virginie Sonney for not having transmitted to the Federal Council the document showing institutionalized corruption

This document

- which Judge Virginie SONNEY should have sent to the Federal Council-

describes the harassment, the coercion and the violation of fundamental rights that the criminal organization infiltrated into the state, where Patrick Foetisch is high-levelplaced, compels the judges to do so to deceive the people and give benefits to members of this criminal organization, such as Philippe BAUER, Christian BETTEX, Patrick FOETISCH, etc.

See exhibit : 21126DE_TB

The written message of DINA BETI is without appeal from the Cantonal Court, It confirms that Patrick FOETISCH used his membership in the Bar Association and his position in this criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament to commit crimes with full impunity as evidenced by the statements of four experts :

(1) Me de Rougemont, the expert of the Parliament of Vaud, who revealed that Me Foetisch used the lack of independence of federal judges to commit his crimes

(2) The Senator Philippe BAUER, former Bar President,who showed that the federal judges were only lackeys of professionals of the law, as Bar President and former Bar President as himself

(3) The dissident lawyer, one of the confreres of Philippe BAUER, who announced himself after the conference of MBA-HEC to reveal the existence of this criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament and the rule of 3 A that members of this criminal organization apply to violate the fundamental rights of the Swiss people

(4) Me Jean-Bernard Schmid, Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, who knows the rule of 3 A, who speaks of State corruption and who said that Dr Erni, deprived of the right to be defended by his lawyer, should be defended by a lawyer

SECOND BREACH OF THE LAW OF SILENCE!

The President of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers, Me Birgit Sambeth Glasner, revealed that the Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA, Me Patrick Foetisch, contrary to what are claiming members of the Bar Association, would not have been a member of the Bar Association

Observation : Either the President of the FSA lied to protect the image and credibility of FSA members, or she told the Truth. There is a clue given by the dissident lawyer that suggests she told the truth.

See exhibit : 211207DE_BS

Action

The message of the cantonal judge Dina BETI was communicated to the Federal Council with the revelations of the President of the FSA :

"that is to say, that Me Foetisch would have committed his crimes by being protected by the Bar Presidents for 26 years while he was not a member of the Bar Association"

Karin Keller-Sutter
Justice Minister

The entire Federal Council, whose Minister of Justice, knows the revelations of the President of the FSA

...and the facts revealed by judges Virginie Sonney and Dina BETI who claim to be bound by the 3 A rule to violate the fundamental rights of the Swiss people..

To read : 211208DE_CF

REMINDER: THE THREE A RULE IS A WAR STRATEGY USED BY MEMBERS OF A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION TO VIOLATE THE VALUES OF LIFE AND THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE WITH FULL IMPUNITY.

For example, the climate emergency is due to the fact that members of a criminal organization infiltrated into the State have no interest in respecting the Values of Life and the rights of future generations in relation to the profit they derive from the destruction of the resources of the planet. They weaken, impoverish and ultimately subjugate the young people who depend on their power, by imposing the law of silence with the power of the capitalist.

Another example is vaccinating of children, who have virtually no risk with covid-19, will prevent their immune systems from developing properly to fight disease. By imposing on them this crutch that they do not need, the vaccinated children will be like the AIDS patients who are dependent on "Tritherapy" all their Life. They will be Weakened, Impoverished and Subjugated to the members of this criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament. They will become dependent on a vaccine, when they did not need it, and frequent reminders with risks to allegedly protect adults...while this does not work, by intellectual dishonesty of those who must protect them.

On the other hand, if they self-immunize, their naturally enhanced immune system will be much more powerful to protect them and avoid contaminating adults. They will be able to live without this drug and its boosters.... only disadvantage, they will not benefit members of the criminal organization infiltrated into the state. It will have no influence on their future. They will be free.

Third example, the interventions of the Bar Presidents, which are described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry,

See exhibit: 051217DP_GC

These interventions allow members of the bar association, like Patrick Foetisch, to commit crimes with impunity with the protection of members of the criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament, one of whom is Senator Philippe BAUER.

In this case, the criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament went so far as to ask the federal judges to deprive Dr. Erni of the right to be defended by his lawyer Me R.S. who could prove the violation of fundamental rights.

They misused their power in censoring the Press,

The members of the Federal Council and Parliament, who would like to respect fundamental rights, seem forced to respect the law of silence under the threat of this criminal organization.

"THE SHAMAN’S PROPHECY IN 2001"

The Federal Council knows that in 2001, a Shaman, who had predicted the attacks of September 11, 2001, said that the world of finance had to change. She said that capitalists destroy the planet’s resources and kill people’s children of others

She had announced to Dr.Erni that his destiny would lead him to have to unmask state leaders who violate the Values of Life and to have to bring about change.

See Exhibit: 211110DE_CF.

On September 11, 2021, all parliamentarians discovered the justification given by the Order of Lawyers, represented by Me Jean-Paul Maire, to cover and justify the crimes committed by one of their members, Me Patrick Foetisch,

Quote:

"Why did you sign a contract with the President of ICSA. You should have known who Foetisch was! Like the authors of the DEP, before meeting with the dissident lawyer, I did not know that Foetisch was high up in a criminal organization! »

end of quote

For details, see exhibit: 210911DE_AA

THE FULFILLMENT OF THE PROPHECY

A physicist, like Galileo, Einstein, Dr.Erni, cannot explain with the classical theories of physics that a Shaman could predict the attacks in New York.

'It’s like covid-19, we could fight it if science could explain it. It’s not the case..

When a shaman tells a physicist, MBA, that his destiny will lead him to have to unmask state leaders who violate the Values of Life.....,

....when his fate makes him meet a dissident lawyer who explains the rule of 3 A, with the existence of the criminal organization infiltrated in the Parliament, where Me Foetisch is high placed...,.,

....when this lawyer tells him that words no longer serve any purpose and that in order to obtain respect for fundamental rights a Federal Councillor must be killed....,

........ the physicist knows that words can still be used to ask for a written discharge from those who violate fundamental rights or to force them to ask for it from their superior and from members of Parliament and the Federal Council!

This request for discharge allowed the Federal Council to discover the scope of the prophecy of the Shaman which announces a civil war of modern times if it does not take measures to enforce the Values of Life

In particular, this request for discharge led Judge DINA BETI to refuse to discharge Judge Virginie SONNEY who did not inform the Federal Council that she was forced to violate the fundamental rights of the Swiss people, knowing that members of Parliament had deprive Dr. Erni of the right to be defended by his lawyer by federal judges,,....

...the most important thing is that Dina BETI has confirmed in writing that the judicial system cannot work with federal judges who violate a citizen’s right to be represented by his or her lawyer. She has shown that the Federal Council violates the fundamental rights of the Swiss people by recommending to reject the initiative on justice. The message of Dina BETI states in substance that all judges are forced to violate the fundamental rights of citizens following the facts described in the request for parliamentary inquiry.

=> This is the definition of institutionalized corruption

This request for discharge led the President of the FSA to reveal that Me Patrick FOETISCH would not have been a member of the BAR ASSOCIATION during the 26 years when he enjoyed the protection of members of the BAR ASSOCIATION and of the FSA, including Me Christian BETTEX and the Senator Philippe BAUER

These revelations of the President of the FSA would explain the acts of forfeiture of the expert Claude ROUILLER and the Attorney General Eric COTTIER who gave the order to assassinate Pierre Penel according to the dissident lawyer.

This is a case of state corruption showing the power of the rule of 3A with the law of silence imposed on members of Parliament by members of the criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament.

If Patrick Foetisch was not a member of the Order of Lawyers, there would have been a breach of the conflict of interest by members of the BAR ASSOCIATION and the FSA, as stated by the lawyer who wants to have a Federal Councillor killed

To be continued.

THE FEDERAL COUNCIL MUST CANCEL THE VOTE ON THE JUSTICE INITIATIVE TO ENSURE RESPECT FOR THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE GUARANTEED BY THE ECHR

Two experienced jurists were forced to reveal to the Federal Council: "a hidden right to the Swiss people that binds them to federal judges".

This hidden right to the Swiss people can provoke a Zug massacre, according to Me de Rougemont, an expert of the Parliament

It enables jurists, members of the Parliament, to obtain that:

"federal judges deprive a citizen of the right to be defended by his lawyer, in order to hide to the Swiss people the violation of the rights guaranteed by the ECHR"

AN EXTRAORDINARY FEDERAL PROSECUTOR USES THE WORD OF CORRUPTION TO QUALIFY THESE FACTS HIDDEN TO THE SWISS PEOPLE BY HIS AUTHORITIES :

He stipulated that the citizen - deprived of the right to be defended by his lawyer - must be defended by a competent lawyer, i.e. that parliamentarians do not have the right to ask federal judges to deprive a citizen of the right to be defended by his lawyer using the relationships that bind political parties to these federal judges.

GUY PARMELIN
PRESIDENT OF THE CONFEDERATION

...is facing an even greater danger than COVID-19, with the behaviour of these two lawyers and the intervention of members of Parliament who have asked federal judges to deprive a citizen of the right to be defended by his lawyer....

...to manage this violation of fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR, GUY PARMELIN, together with the members of the Federal Council, know that institutional corruption is not stopped by depriving a citizen of the right to be defended by his lawyer, but by breaking the law of silence on these relations of deputies with federal judges that allow them to deprive a citizen of the right to be represented by his lawyer!

EVERYONE CAN CHECK THAT THE FEDERAL COUNCIL HAS WELL RECEIVED THIS REVELATIONS FROM PHILIPPE BAUER AND FROM JUDGE VIRGINIE SONNEY. INDEED, THIS INFORMATION WAS ALSO COMMUNICATED TO HIM BY REGISTERED MAIL & PERSONAL,...
AS EVIDENCED, THE FOLLOWING EXHIBIT :
REFERENCE : 211201DE_CF

READ THE REVELATIONS MADE BY SENATOR PHILIPPE BAUER TO THE FEDERAL COUNCIL :

To read : 211122DE_PB

The Senator Philippe BAUER, while he was deputy in the Neuchâtel Parliament, had asked the federal judges to pronounce a judgment which says that a lawyer forbidden to testify by the Bar President must disobey the Bar President - exposing himself to be disbarred from the Order of Lawyers - to ensure the respect of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR of his defrauded client. This client had been swindled by a fellow lawyer of Philippe BAUER. Federal judges obeyed this deputy, who was Philippe BAUER and who could influence their election.

The entire Federal Council knows that :

A Member of the Neuchâtel Parliament, like Philippe BAUER, cannot enforce the rights guaranteed by the ECHR with such influence peddling….. which was used to hide a scam established by an expertise of Professor Riklin and the assassination of Philippe Bauer confrere’s right-hand man. Philippe BAUER confrere’s name was Patrick Foetisch. The right-hand man of Patrick FOETISCH was P. Penel. This guy knew too much about the activities of Philippe BAUER fellow lawyer, who was P. Foetisch...

TO READ THE REVELATIONS MADE BY THE JURIST JUDGE VIRGINIE SONNEY TO THE FEDERAL COUNCIL :

To read : 21126DE_TB

The judge Virginie Sonney knowing that one of the leader of the Liberal Party, Philippe BAUER, had obtained from the Federal Court a judgement which say that the lawyer must disobey the President of the Bar so that the fundamental rights of his client ( D.E) are not violated, ......

...... The judge Virginie Sonney also knowing that Me R.S. defending his client (D.E) said that he could demonstrate that his client (D.E) was the object of a permanent denial of justice,...,...

.....The judge Virginie also aware that Members of Vaud Parliament have asked the federal judges to deprive (D.E.) of the right to be defended by Me R.S., his lawyer, who could prove the permanent denial of justice,

........The judge Virginie Sonney knowing further that the federal judges at the request of the deputies have deprived Me R.S. Client (D.E.) of the right to be defended by Me R.S., his lawyer,.....

…. The judge Virginie Sonney knowing, moreover, that D.E. requires a lawyer to represent him….

……. The judged Virginie Sonney started making judgments to harass D.E., knowing that D.E. no longer has a lawyer to be defended, despite the request made to the Swiss Federation of Lawyers by D.E. in order get a lawyer to defend his fundamental right...

....... and she did so despite the words of an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor who speaks of corruption to qualify these facts!!

The entire Federal Council knows that :

Virginie Sonney cannot enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR, with federal judges, who at the request of Parliament have deprived a citizen of the right to be represented by his lawyer and with the Press which is censored

THE ENTIRE FEDERAL COUNCIL KNOWS THAT THE NOVEMBER 28, 2021 VOTE ON THE JUSTICE INITIATIVE WAS FLAWED BY THESE HIDDEN FACTS TO THE SWISS PEOPLE.

AS HE KNOWS THAT A PANDEMIC CANNOT BE FOUGHT BY DECIDING THAT IT IS OVER.... 

...THE FEDERAL COUNCIL ALSO KNOWS THAT HE CANNOT ENFORCE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE SWISS PEOPLE GUARANTEED BY THE ECHR WITH THE RELATIONS THAT BIND SENATOR PHILIPPE BAUER AND JUDGE VIRGINIE SONNEY TO THE FEDERAL JUDGES,..

...HE KNOWS THAT THESE LAWYERS HAVE SHOWN THAT THERE IS NO POINT IN DOING AN APPEAL TO THE FEDERAL COURT WITH JUDGES WHO ARE NOT INDEPENDENT, AS PHILIPPE BAUER AND DEPUTIES HAVE SHOWN IT BY DEPRIVING A CITIZEN TO BE DEFENDED BY HIS LAWYER...

...HE SIMPLY KNOWS THAT HE CANNOT ENFORCE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE SWISS PEOPLE WITH DEPUTIES WHO DEPRIVE A CITIZEN OF THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED BY HIS LAWYER!

IT IS ABUSE OF AUTHORITY AND HARASSMENT THAT IS FAR MORE SERIOUS THAN THE ONE IN THE WORLD OF SPORT, WHICH IS NOW RECOGNIZED BY THE FEDERAL COUNCIL:

To read : 211201DE_CF

"If a lawyer wants to uphold the fundamental rights of the people, he must: DARE TO SAY"

"DARE TO SAY" is a rule of common sense given by Me R. Schaller that every citizen understands !

In order to ensure respect for the fundamental rights of a citizen, the President of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers dared to say before the votes on 28 November that:

The jurists of Parliament have put in place a hidden rule to the people that does not allow federal judges to respect the fundamental rights of the people. This rule vitiates the vote of November 28, see the alert given to the Federal Council.

It is the prestigious Senator of the Liberal Party, Me Philippe BAUER, one of the most influential jurists of Parliament, who had to tell the Federal Council that his message to the people for the vote of the initiative on justice is false and violates the fundamental rights of the people.

Me Philippe BAUER showed in an example how he himself has already used the relations that bind him to federal judges to give advantages to his fellow lawyer by crassly violating the fundamental rights of the people. See the alert he had to give to the Federal Council.

Me Birgit Sambeth Glasner
FSA PRESIDENT

She finally breaks the law of silence on the relations between the jurists of Parliament and the federal judges

The vote on the initiative on justice is flawed: the jurists of Parliament have hidden from the people the existence of a "SECRET RULE" that binds them to federal judges. It could be cancelled.

"A SECRET RULE THAT BINDS THE JURISTS OF PARLIAMENT TO THE FEDERAL JUDGES": it is a crass violation of fundamental rights by our elected representatives.

The rule hidden from the people by our elected representatives, revealed by the president of the FSA, is the following :

«an authorization from the Bâtonnier is required to file a criminal complaint against a corporate lawyer who commits a crime, even though he does not hold a lawyer’s licence and is not a member of the Bar Association »

See Exhibit : 211119DE_CF

Here is the personal example that Senator Philippe BAUER, one of the most influential jurists in Parliament, had to reveal to the members of the Federal Council to show the Federal Councillors that: "the message of the Federal Council to the People for the initiative on justice" was false and misleading:

" Me Philippe Bauer has shown the Neuchâtel Courts that, with the rule revealed by the President of the FSA, it is sufficient for a company lawyer not to respond to a summons of the Bâtonnier, as his fellow lawyer Patrick Foetisch, did, so that the litigant cannot obtain authorization from the Bâtonnier and has his fundamental rights violated by the federal judge" .

This trick of not responding to the Bâtonnier allows to create millions of damages, or even that a General Prosecutor gives the order to assassinate a witness who knew too much and who had become dangerous for those who protected Foetisch as showed one of the Fellow lawyers of Senator Bauer on this website .

Me Philippe BAUER explains:

In this case, where the Neuchâtel Courts had ruled in favour of the litigant, Philippe Bauer showed that it was sufficient for him to appeal to the Federal Court to have the federal judges agree with him to overtuned the Cantonal decision that enforces the fundamental rights of the litigant.

So that the Federal Council could not ignore this situation and that it does not violate the fundamental rights of the people with a false message, this experienced jurist very influential of Parliament, that is Senator Philippe BAUER, was given notice to inform the Federal Council, before the vote on November 28, of this personally experienced example which shows that :

contrary to what the Federal Councillors claim in their message to the people : the current system has not proven himself, as this has already been established by Me François de Rougemont an expert of the Parliament of Vaud.

To read exhibit : 211122DE_PB

THANKS

Thanks to the President of the FSA for having "dared to say" to ensure respect for the fundamental rights of the people that the jurists of Parliament have established a hidden right to the people that :

"Federal judges cannot respect the fundamental rights of the people if they are chosen and elected by parliamentarians."

Thanks to Senator Philippe Bauer for "having to say to federal Councillor" that :

"Federal judges cannot enforce the fundamental rights of the people if they are chosen and elected by parliamentarians."

By giving a real-life example to the Federal Council which shows how federal judges, chosen and elected by members of Parliament, are forced by lack of independence to apply a hidden right to the people by the jurists of Parliament, knowing that this right violates the fundamental rights of the people.

This documented real-life example - which had led a Neuchâtel judge to establish the violation of fundamental rights - is the following :

if a company lawyer, like his fellow lawyer, Me Foetisch, does not respond to the summons of the Bâtonnier, then he (Me Philippe BAUER)  could enrich his fellow lawyers, while violating the rights of the people thanks to the secret rules, hidden from the people, which bound him to the federal judges and which were set up by the jurists of Parliament.

211119DE_CF

211122DE_PB

He requires that this right not be violated. This case is related to the relationship between Philippe BAUER and the federal judges..

See exhibit 211115DE_OP

An extraordinary Federal Prosecutor who saw the case and had to keep it secret, for reasons he did not reveal, talks about corruption and confirms that the physicist cannot defend himself without a lawyer.

See exhibit 210201JB_DE

To notice that In 2016, a fellow lawyer of Philippe BAUER and Christian BETTEX announced that the federal judges would deprive the physicist of his legal representation. This lawyer had claimed that there was a criminal organization infiltrated into the state behind the case. He said that only the death of a Federal Councillor could put an end to the actions of this criminal organization.

The President of the FSA (Swiss Bar Association) has just confirmed that there are jurists in Parliament who have implemented a Right that does not exist for the people. The assertions of the fellow lawyer of Senator Philippe Bauer are confirmed and the Federal Council must be warned.

Guy Parmelin
Confederation President

must state that it is not acceptable for federal judges to deprive a physicist from being defended by hisr lawyer

Senator Philippe BAUER is a member of the Parliament’s Management Committee. It does not hide from anyone that it can use its political power to give benefits to customers. He was criticized by fellow lawyers, including the dissident lawyer.

See Exhibit 190403DE_PB

All parties were informed of the situation,

In particular the Swiss Television RTS which has the obligation to make objective information for the votes of November 28, 20211.

See exhibit: 211117DE_PC

IMPORTANCE OF THE SHAMAN’S MESSAGE
FOR THE FEDERAL COUNCIL

The Shaman had given a message on the respect of Life, while the dissident lawyer said that the words were no longer useful in front of our leaders who have no interest in enforcing the fundamental rights of the people.

The message of the shaman was :

You must expose leaders who no longer want to respect fundamental rights and bring about change.

….,the operation to expose leaders who do not want to respect fundamental rights is over.

The silence of the Federal Council gives reason to the dissident lawyer. It also gives reason to the Shaman in the case where it provokes a change from the federal Councillor, and this one decide to break the silence and enforce fundamental Rights.

As the shaman said, leaders who remain silent on the violation of fundamental rights have been warned of the risks and urged to change their behaviours

See exhibit : 211117DE_CF

The important thing is also that the President of the FSA breaks the perpetual motion :

See exhibit : 211115DE_OP

She must also show that:

it is unacceptable that lawyers like Christian Bettex agree to ask the Federal Court to deprive a physicist of the right to be represented by his lawyer,

or

that it is unacceptable for a Me Philippe BAUER to give advantages to his fellows lawyers by using his relations that bind him to the Federal Judges.

It is necessary that the Federal Council recommends the acceptance of the initiative on justice to respect its Oath to give access to independent Courts of a Senator philippe BAUER, and his fellows lawyers, etc...!

The prediction of a shaman in 2001 on the violation of the fundamental rights of our people by elected representatives

In 2001, a shaman predicted to a physicist that his fate would lead him to have to expose state leaders who violate the Values of Life and to have to bring about change. She said that capitalists destroy the resources of the planet and kill the children of others...

She spoke of the apocalypse, the forces of evil and the destiny of every citizen,… She recalled that these facts are foretold in the scriptures of the Bible… , . where we also find the measures taken by God to punish those who violate the rights of a people……

There is a message from the Almighty God of the Constitution that has become topical since the President of the FSA (Swiss Bar Association) confirmed the Predictions of the Shaman ,

This is the message that this God gave in the Bible, when he put an end to the enslavement of the people of ISRAEL by the Pharaohs, that is :

The only Value that is more important than money to the pharaohs and state leaders who violate the Values of Life is the Life of one of their children.

In 2010, Senator Philippe BAUER confirmed the prediction of the Shaman by showing that he was a Pharaoh or a Hitler of modern times.

To read : 211110DE_CF

NOTICE :

Every citizen and every elected representative can verify that the Federal Constitution begins with :

" IN THE NAME OF ALMIGHTY GOD",.....

and that it does not begin with :

"In the name of the Values of Senator Philippe Bauer, almighty god, and the Values of his fellow lawyers",....

It is recalled that this law applied by federal judges states that :

"an authorization from the President of the Bar is required to lodge a criminal complaint against a company lawyer who commits economic crimes, even though he does not have a lawyer’s certificate and is not a member of the Order of Lawyers»

This request for an authorization from to the President of the Bar violates equality before the law, guaranteed by the Constitution.

As the President of the Bar will refuse to grant authorization, this law put in place by the jurists of Parliament allows the professionals of the law to commit crimes with full impunity.

Observations on this prediction of the Shaman and warning of the elected representatives

This shaman predicted the attacks of September 11, 2001. She announced scourges with the capitalists who kill the children of others.

She said that elected representative had to answer several questions:

Why was I born?
What is my destiny?
Do the forces of evil exist?t?

Some facts that make her right :

in 2001: the Zug massacre

in 2002: the assassination of the Director of ICSA ordered by a magistrate

In 2004: unidentified men terrorize the CEO of a company to dismiss a director if he refuses to give in to the demands of a lawyer

in 2005: the President of the Bar BETTEX forbids the witness Burnet to testify

In 2006: The Parliament expert regrets that orphans of the Zug massacre did not know why their parents dieds

In 2008: Claude Rouiller (former federal judge ) who makes a false expertise to hide this right that does not exist revealed in 2021 by the FSA.

In 2010: Philippe Bauer who brilliantly shows that federal judges are lackeys of President of the Bar and politicians

In 2016: Parliament asks the Federal Court to deprive Dr.Erni of the right to be represented by his lawyer, while the lawyer has the power of attorney and has accepted the mandate

In 2016: A fellow lawyer of Philippe BAUER announces that Parliament is infiltrated by a criminal organization and that words no longer serve any purpose.

......

In 2021, the President of the FSA reveals that the jurists of Parliament have put in place a hidden right to the people,

This revelation with the pandemic and global warming and young people who are being sterilized because they do not want their children to live in this world destroyed by the Values of a Philippe Bauer and his fellows lawyers.....

....give the full scope to the message of the God of the Constitution that one of the children of an elected official who violates the Constitution must die if this elected representative does not want to enforce human rights.

'It was in 2001 that the Shaman said to expose those who do not want to respect the Constitution and to warn them!

20 years later, his prediction is fulfilled and the warning of the exposed leaders has been made...

Update by the President of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers (FSA) on a right that does not exist for the people

Since 2005, Parliament has never wanted to indicate where can be found in the law accessible to the people, the text applied by federal judges which states :

« an authorization from the President of the Bar is required to file a criminal complaint against a Chairman of the Board of Directors of a company who commit economic crimes, if he has a lawyer’s certificate and he is a member of the Bar Association, then such authorization is not required if he does not have a lawyer’s certificate. »

Me Birgit Sambeth Glasner, President of the FSA, has just revealed the existence of this Right that does not exist for the people with a very important precision :

The legislator, i.e. the jurists of Parliament, has indeed established a hidden Right to the people that includes the above right. This Right says:

« an authorization from the President of the Bar is required to file a criminal complaint against a corporate lawyer who commit economic crimes, even though he does not have a lawyer’s certificate and is not a member of the Bar Associations »

THE STATE OF LAWLESSNESS WITH THE CURRENT FEDERAL JUDGES IS CONFIRMED BY THIS REVELATION OF THIS HIDDEN RIGHT TO THE PEOPLE, BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE FSA

This last-minute revelation by the President of the FSA, just before the votes on the Justice Initiative, shows that the Vote on the Justice Initiative will be severely and critically flawed, in view of the existence of this hidden right to the people which was not presented by the Press, by the Parliament and by the Federal Council in the explanatory note for the vote of 28 November 20211.

The existence of this right hidden from the people, makes it possible to understand the functioning of institutionalized corruption.

It explains the reasons why the jurists of Parliament - who have put in place this hidden Right to the people - want the rejection of the Justice Initiative.

NOTE THAT:

If the Justice Initiative is accepted, federal judges will be able to confirm that this hidden Right to the people, put in place by the jurists of Parliament, violates the fundamental rights of citizens guaranteed by the Federal Constitutionl

WHY DIDN’T FEDERAL COUNCILLOR KARIN-KELLER SUTTER MENTION IT??

Karin Keller-Sutter
Minister of Justiz

It is incomprehensible that the Federal Councillor, Karin KELLER-SUTTER, was not informed by the lawyers of her department of the existence of this hidden right to the people, revealed by the President of the FSA.

Being sworn in, the lawyers of her department could not ignore that she had to inform the people of the existence of this right hidden to the people, as the President of the FSA did it at the last minute.

A request for immediate action was made to the Federal Council, following this last minute revelation by the President of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers:

Read :

211103DE_KK

* * *

Comments

For the members of the Management Committee of the Parliament, who are not lawyers, the President of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers gave the reason that the federal judges agreed with their prestigious colleague, Senator Philippe BAUER, who had asked these judges to confirm by a judgment of the Federal Court that his colleague forbade to testify by the Bar President Christian BETTEX, should have disobeyed the Bar President so that the fundamental rights of his client are not violated.

These members of the Management Committee also now know why another colleague of the jurist, Philippe BAUER, says that a Federal Councillor must be shot down to force Parliament to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution, ……

....,instead of the jurists of Parliament putting in place a Right that does not exist for the people, .....

...., to reduce the role of federal judges to that of faithful lackeys of their colleague the Senator Philippe BAUER,,...

..., to wilfully violate the fundamental rights of the people and to cover the crimes committed by corrupt elites,....

The Right that does not exist for the people

In 2005, an elite of citizens asked for an explanation from the legislator who had stipulated that a request for authorization from the President of the Bar Association was required in order to file a criminal complaint against a Chairman of the board of directors of a company, who commits a crime, who has a lawyer’s certificate and who is a member of the Bar Association, ......when you should not have this authorization, if the chairman who commit a crimes, did not have a lawyer’s certificate.

To be sure to be heard, the elite of citizens use the tool of "The request for a parliamentary inquiry" to clarify the existence of this hidden Right to the people he has just discovered.

This elite of citizens promises to witness the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution by this hidden Right to the people, put in place by the legislator.

The members of this elite testify that the power of the Judges is reduced by the decisions of the President of the Bar. They testify that the relationship between the Judges and the President of the Bar violates the fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR, including access to independent Courts of the President of the Bar. They are witnesses to crimes committed by professionals of the law with federal judges who are not independent.

They cite in the request for a parliamentary inquiry several examples of interventions by Presidents of the Bar including that of Me Christian BETTEX, that of the former President of the Bar Yves Burnand,.... and that of Me Philippe Richard cited below, which violates the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution and the ECHR, including equality before the law, quote:

"L'ancien Bâtonnier Me Philippe Richard avait autorisé le Dr ERNI à porter plainte pénale seulement contre les dirigeants de 4M bien que le principal auteur de la violation du copyright était Me Foetisch"

See exhibit : 051217DP_GC

Parliament’s response, which mandated Me de Rougemont, Ombudsman of Parliament, to deal with the request for a parliamentary inquiry and to respond to the witnesses who filed it:

Me de Rougemont replies that - in the case described by the elite of citizens - there is a violation of access to independent Courts by the legislator. The latter does not have set up  independent federal courts and judges to judge these types of crimes. He confirms that federal judges cannot enforce the rule of law in this situation.

He explains that the implementing laws put in place by the legislator allow legal professionals to circumvent respect for the rights of the people and commit crimes with impunity. Quote :

"Nous avons apprécié que le médiateur nous expose les particularités de la loi vaudoise qui permettent la criminalité économique par des hommes de lois en leur assurant l’impunité"

See exhibit: 070827DP_GC

In summary:
According to this expert from Parliament, the crimes come from the lack of independence of the federal judges of the Bar Association, which does not allow them to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution.

The position of a second expert appointed by Parliamentt

The Parliament withdraws the mandate of Me de Rougemont, it asks a former federal judge to take a position on the testimony of the elite of citizen with the facts set out in the request for parliamentary inquiry.

This new expert is Me Claude Rouiller. He is a former federal judge who is not independent. This new expert denies in a report the facts testified by the elite of citizens, without any motivation.

This expert denies Dr ERNI’s lawyer the right to express his views on his report. He will also be subject to a prescription interruption for false expertise that he will not dispute!

From the position of a third expert, who is a colleague to Bar Presidents and former Bar Presidents, members of the FSA

In 2016, a senior lawyer colleague of several former Bar Presidents, members of the FSA, among them Senator Philippe BAUER, Me Christian BETTEX, etc., confirms the facts established by Me de Rougemont the expert of the Parliament. In particular, he points out that the entire case shows that it is the violation of an access to an independent Federal Court that is used by Law Professionals to commit crimes with full impunity.

He says that parliaments are infiltrated by a criminal organization whose members control the Federal Court. He also claims that the practices described by the authors of the request for a parliamentary inquiry serve to hide the murder of Pierre Penel at the request of the magistrate Eric COTTIER.

The blackmail on Dr ERNI’s CEO related to this assassination

This colleague of the Senator Philippe BAUER is aware of the interventions of the Bar Presidents of the FSA. He knows that unidentified men were exerting a climate of terror on the CEO of Dr ERNI to dismiss Dr Erni, if the latter refused to yield to the demands of Yves Burnand, author of the slanderous denunciation against Dr ERNI..

The impossible fact in a rule of law revealed by this expert:

"THE FEDERAL COURT WILL DEPRIVE DR.ERNI OF THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED BY HIS LAWYER, Mr R.S., AT THE REQUEST OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT"

He explains that Mr R.S. lawyer of Dr ERNI is a witness to all the facts set out above, as described by the application to the ECHR dated 10 August 2021, and the exhibit including an excerpt from Exhibit 11 which can be found on the following internet links:

Extract Exhibit 11 (requête CEDH2021)

Application to the European Court of Human Rights: 2021_CEDH

...this expert says that as long as there is a breach of access to independent federal Courts, there is the principle of the prohibition of conflict of interest, which is an internal rule for lawyers that is also violated.... In view of the knowledge of Me R.S., he explains that, without his lawyer, it will be impossible for Dr ERNI to be able to enforce his fundamental rights,.... This expert says that federal judges will deprive Dr.ERNI of the right to be represented by his lawyer, Mr R.S…  This will be a proof of the existence of this criminal organization that controls the Federal Court.

Finally, the expert says:

This request for authorization to the Bar President is a Right that does not exist in the Constitution and the laws available to the public.

...that is why members of the criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament withdrew the mandate from Me de Rougemont and hired a former federal judge, Me Claude ROUILLER, to use his title of federal judge to deny the facts established by the elite of citizens in his request for parliamentary inquiry. This approach allows them to deny the fact established by Me de ROUGEMONT, namely that federal judges were not independent of the Bar Presidents .

UNIMAGINABLE FACT IN A STATE OF LAW: THE FEDERAL JUDGES - WHO ARE NOT INDEPENDENT - DEPRIVED DR. ERNI OF THE RIGHT TO BE REPRESENTED BY HIS LAWYER, ME R.S. AS THIS EXPERT HAD ANNOUNCED IT.

Dr Erni contacted the President of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers to find a lawyer to enforce his fundamental rights..

Dr Erni then contacted the President of the FSA to explain the situation

See letter of 31 August 2021, reference 210830DE_BS

..To ask him to find him a lawyer to enforce his fundamental rights, informing Parliament and the Supervisory Authority of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Confederation .

See letter of 13 September, reference 210913DE_BS, addressed to the President of the FSA

See letter of 13 September, reference 210913DE_HU, addressed to the Supervisory Authority of the Office of the Attorney General Prosecutor of the Confederation

See letter of 13 September, reference 210913DE_AB, addressed to the President of the Federal Assembly.

Dr ERNI reminded the President of the FSA, the methods of gangsters applied by the members of the criminal organization which had assassinated Pierre PENEL and which made threaten his CEO to dismiss him if he did not yield to the demands of the former President of the Bar, FSA lawyer, Yves Burnand, see letter dated 14 October 2021, reference 211014DE_BS

FOR THE FIRST TIME IN 26 YEARS OF PROCEEDINGS, THE PRESIDENT OF THE SWISS FEDERATION OF LAWYERS HAS REVEALED THAT THERE IS A HIDDEN RIGHT FOR THE PEOPLE, ESTABLISHED BY PARLIAMENTARY JURISTS, WHICH REDUCES THE POWER OF FEDERAL JUDGES AND ALLOWS INSTITUTIONALIZED CORRUPTIONE.

This hidden Right by the Parliament that does not exist for the people is :

"an authorization from the President of the Bar is required to file a criminal complaint against a corporate lawyer who commit economic crimes, even though he does not have a lawyer’s certificate and is not a member of the Bar Associations »

See exhibit: 211022SB_DE

with the consequence of the 28 November vote on justice, which is vitiated by the information provided by the Federal Councill

See exhibit: 211103DE_KK

Important Observation

With the existence of this hidden right to the public by the parliamentary jurists, which says that it requires authorization from the President of the Bar to file a criminal complaint against a corporate lawyer who commits economic crimes, even though he does not have a lawyer’s certificate and is not a member of the FSA, all the procedures applied for 26 years by the criminal organization infiltrated into the Parliament that controls the Federal Court become consistent.

All the explanations of the expert of the Parliament become logical, we observe that Robert Bisig is a jurist, Senator Philippe BAUER is a jurist, Me Christian BETTEX is a jurist, Me Yves Burnand is a jurist,.... they are all involved in economic crimes, where the Right that does not exist for the people, revealed by the President of the FSA, allows them to violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution, this also applies to the President of the Supervisory Authority of the MPC and to all the jurists of Parliaments

.

....This revelation by the President of the FSA shows that the highest authorities of the Country no longer enforce fundamental rights as asserted by the expert who revealed the existence of the criminal organization infiltrated in the Parliaments.

Our William TELL of modern times , Adrian GASSER, recalls that the aim of this initiative is to put an end to INSTITUTIONALIZED CORRUPTION.

Listen TJ 12:45 of 26.10.2021

Vote YES to have independent federal judges simply to force Parliament to enforce this right guaranteed by the federal Constitution, which corrupt elites have always cleverly violated like equal pay for women……. !

From the extraordinary reservoir of independent federal judges, hidden from the people, by members of the corrupt elites who impose their federal judges

In Switzerland, we have an extraordinary pool of very competent lawyers who are not affiliated with any party. They are by definition completely independent of political power.

The corrupt elites forbid them the right to become federal judges, while they are the only ones to be independent and not to serve party members, and to have to give back up to 20% of their salary to the parties that choose and elect them.

It should be noted that only the appointment of these highly competent and independent jurists to the position of Federal Judges could guarantee to our people the respect of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

It should be noted that :

There is only a 5% of the population affiliated to parties that imposes the judges who depend on them, to the 95% of our people who are not affiliated to their parties,

This 5% of the population grossly and cleverly violates respect for access to independent federal judges, which is guaranteed by the Constitution for all citizens

Adrian GASSER,

Our William Tell of modern times recalled that 130,000 citizens signed his initiative to end institutionalized corruption.

These three lawyers are prestigious representatives of the legislative, executive, and constitutional supervisory authorities.

Legislative authority :

Senator Philippe BAUER Former President of the Bar, lawyer member of the FSA Business Card This prestigious Senator is member of the Management Committee of the Swiss Parliament. He is one of the leaders of the Liberal Party who represents the Values of the Corrupt Elites at the Management Committee. IHe was one of the representatives of the Order of Lawyers in relation to federal judges

His explanations given to federal judges that show how institutionalized corruption works

In 2005, his FSA colleague, Christian BETTEX, forbade a lawyer, the sole witness of a slanderous denunciation, to testify, even though he wanted to testify. This slanderous denunciation was used to make professional blackmail against a physicist and to cover a crime, where there was a death (assassinated at the request of the Magistrate Eric COTTIER, according to one of his colleagues).

Like Me Philippe BAUER, representative of the Order of Lawyers, the Cantonal Court of Neuchâtel understood very well that this prohibition to testify of Me Christian BETTEX, made to the witness of the slanderous denunciation, violated the fundamental rights of the physicist guaranteed by the Constitution.

Since the federal judges were not independent, Philippe Bauer told them that they had to overturn this cantonal judgment, arguing in their judgment that the lawyer, forbidden to testify, should have disobeyed the Bar President- who was Me Christian BETTEX - so that the fundamental rights of the physicist are not violated.

These federal judges, who must pay up to 20% of their salary to the parties of the federal elected officials to thank them for having been chosen, carried out the orders of Philippe Bauer, the senator who is a member of the FSA.

Here is one of the examples of institutionalized corruption given by this Senator, who is a prominent member of the corrupt elites

.....All members of the Parliament Management Committee are aware of this, as evidenced by an application to the ECHR. We don’t know if they share the Values of this colleague, a member of a corrupt elite.

To read the application to the ECHR : 2021_CEDH

Executive Power :

Me Christian BETTEX Former President of the Bar, lawyer member of the FSA Business Card This prestigious former Bar President, colleague to Senator Philippe BAUER was a lawyer of the FSA mandated by the Vaud State Council to represent him. He was also a lawyer of the FSA mandated by the Parliament of Vaud (legislative power) to represent him

His explanations given on federal judges in Parliament that show the functioning of institutionalized corruption

Me Christian BETTEX, mandated by the Vaud State Council to participate in a mediation concerning the prohibition which he had made to the witness of the slanderous denunciation to testify, confirmed to the President of the Parliament that the Federal Judges were not independent of the Bar Association. This fact had already been established by Me De Rougemont, expert of the Vaud Parliament. He explained that it was impossible to deny the slanderous denunciation, where he forbade the witness to testify. The lawyer’s client would have his Life destroyed. This was the consequence of the violation of access to independent federal judges.

He was also mandated by members of the Vaud Parliament to deprive the physicist of the right to be represented by his lawyer. He then simply asked the Federal Judges, as a former President of the Bar and lawyer of the FSA mandated by Parliament, to deprive the physicist of the right to be represented by his lawyer.

The federal judges, who are not independent and whose election depends on the parties, obeyed Me Christian BETTEX and they deprived the physicist of the right to be represented by his lawyer.

These are two examples of institutionalized corruption, where a former President of the Bar, lawyer of the FSA, explains and shows that the violation of access to federal judges by Parliament makes it possible to grossly violate the rights of the people

Supervisory authority :

Me Nicolas CHARRIÈRE Former President of the Bar, lawyer member of the FSA Business Card This prestigious former Bar President, colleague to Senator Philippe BAUER and Me Christian BETTEX is the : PRESIDENT OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE

His explanations given on federal judges to the physicist which show the functioning of institutionalized corruption

Deprived of the right to be represented by his lawyer, the physicist addressed this President of the Supervisory Committee of the Judicial Council. He made him aware that the violation of access to independent federal judges by the colleagues of this President of the Supervisory Authority by the legislator violated his fundamental rights of citizen guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.

This expert in the world of judicial supervisory accused the physicist of not expressing himself as a lawyer, while Parliament deprived him of the right to be defended by his lawyer. Faced with the problem of Parliament violating access to independent federal judges, he said that they do not have the jurisdiction to monitor... He showed brilliantly that they were not an independent supervisory authority, but rather an authority whose purpose is to hide from the people the violations of fundamental rights..

This is another example of institutionalized corruption.

THE KNOWN CONSEQUENCES

Justice is no longer credible as shown by Michael LAUBER, or Eric COTTIER. The latter allegedly ordered the assassination of Pierre PENEL. He uses procedures that do not exist according to a CAP insurance lawyer to cover up organized crime and coerce victims.

A dissident lawyer who does not share the values of the corrupt elites says that a Federal Councillor must be killed to put an end to this institutionalized corruption.

He said that the state is using against the physicist a right that does not exist . According to him, it is the laws of a criminal organization that control the Federal Court that the corrupt elites apply....

CONCLUSION ;

The Physicist recommends acceptance of the Justice Initiative to end institutionalized corruption

He asked the President of the FSA to find him a lawyer to enforce his fundamental rights, since the example above shows that there are three former President of the BAR, mandated as Lawyers of the FSA, who violate the Values of the FSA and the Values of the ECHR.

See exhibit 211022DE_BS

He lodged a complaint with the Parliament Management Committee to ensure full transparency on this right which does not exist that applies their colleague Senator Philippe BAUER.

See exhibit 211027DE_CG

211022DE_BS

211027DE_CG

The Executive Board of the Swiss Parliament's Services, chaired by Philippe Schwab, urgently reminds all parliamentarians that they are obliged to respect Article 35 of the Federal Constitution for the justice initiative:

"The deputies and senators have no right to recommend the rejection of the initiative on justice, which corrects a major and critical dysfunction of the Swiss judicial system".

To read: 211018DE_AF

Philippe Schwab
Executive Board Chairman
of Parliament's Services

... the Senators of Parliament have no right to hide from the people the existence of the criminal organization which controls the Federal Court...where the President of the Board of Directors of ICSA, Patrick Foetisch, is very high up...

Moreover, to justify the acceptance of this initiative, Parliament must inform citizens of the way in which the prestigious Senator Philippe BAUER, a member of the Liberal Party, has reduced the role of federal judges to that of lackeys of corrupt elites.

He provides them with a document showing that only the corrupt elites of Parliament, who no longer want to enforce the fundamental rights of the people, have an interest in recommending the rejection of the Justice Initiative

Discover the document distributed by the leadership of Parliament to all members of the Federal Assembly to make them aware that they violate the fundamental rights of the people by recommending the rejection of the Initiative on Justice :

211018DE_AF

TO POINT OUT THE SERIOUS DISADVANTAGES FOR THE CORRUPT ELITES OF PARLIAMENT IF THE PEOPLE ACCEPT THE INITIATIVE

Since the federal judges will be independent, they will no longer have to lick the boots of the members of the criminal organization infiltrated into the state, where Foetisch is in a high position to be elected to the Federal Court.

They will no longer need to cover the acts of forfeiture of an General Prosecutor, such as Eric COTTIER, who applies procedures that do not exist, according to a lawyer of the CAP INSURANCE, to cover organized crime

They will no longer have to cover state corruption, by having to make acts of forfeiture that violate the rights guaranteed by the ECHR, as evidenced by the following request addressed to the ECHR :

2021_CEDH

If we take the example of the Prestigious Senator of the Liberal Party, that is the lawyer Philippe BAUER, who is an excellent representative of the corrupt elites :

The federal judges being independent, Phiippe BAUER will no longer be able to discredit them by showing that they are only lackeys of the members of the parties who choose them and elect them.

NOTE THE GREAT BENEFITS FOR THE 95% OF OUR PEOPLE IF THE INITIATIVE IS ACCEPTEDE

The costs of justice and trial times will be shortened by judges who must not obey corrupt elites.

Corrupt Parliament elites no longer having lackeys to protect them, corruption will decrease.

RIGHT OF REPLY AND CENSORSHIP OF THE PRESSE

The press will be freer if the judges are independent of the political world.

If the Parliament and the Federal Council recommend acceptance of the Initiative, they will show that one of the experts of the Zug massacre - who says that the Highest Authorities of the Country no longer want to enforce the fundamental rights of the people - is wrong.

They will show that contrary to what this experienced lawyer claims, it is not necessary to have a Maurice BAVAUD who kills a Federal Councillor to end the violation of fundamental rights by the criminal organization infiltrated in the State.

Serious violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution by the members of the Federal Council who want the rejection of the Initiative.

Their Oath does not allow them to recommend the rejection of the Initiative which corrects the crass violation by political parties of the access to independent Federal Judges which is guaranteed by the ECHR and also the Federal Constitution..

FEDERAL COUNCILLOR KARIN KELLER SUTTER FORGETS THAT SHE TOOK THE OATH TO RESPECT THE CONSTITUTION AND THAT ARTICLE 35 OF THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRES THE FEDERAL COUNCIL TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO INDEPENDENT FEDERAL JUDGES

LISTEN TO :

TJ 12:45 October,11, 2021

A federal judge must not have a political label to enforce fundamental constitutional rights and the values of the Constitution.

The corrupt elites are using the political labels of federal judges to cover up organized crime and violate the fundamental rights of the people, as Senator Philippe BAUER, a party colleague of Karin KELLER SUTTER, demonstrated it so well.

Right to reply was requested from the TSR so that the November 28 VOTE would not be flawed

To read : 211011DE_PC

Pascal CRITTIN
TSR General Director

For those who want the respect of fundamental rights by the Federal Council, discover this fabulous project that is the initiative for independent federal judges :

JUSTICE INITIATIVE FOR INDEPENDENT FEDERAL JUDGES

To read : 211011DE_PC

The Swiss people has voted a Constitution that must ensure access to independent Courts and independent federal Judges for all citizens, not just for a small minority of citizens, who are affiliated to political parties

It is guaranteed by article 35 of the Federal Constitution that the Federal Councillors have an obligation to respect.

The small minority of citizens affiliated to political parties represent 5% of the Swiss people. The Swiss Constitution was accepted by an absolute majority of the people. It guarantees access to independent federal judges for all citizens.

The magistrates, including the members of the Federal Council, have an obligation to grant access to federal judges independent of political parties to respect the will of the people enshrined in the Constitution.

The 95% of the people, the absolute majority that is not affiliated with a party, is currently deprived of the constitutional right to have access to independent federal judges..

All citizen must only read the following request to the ECHR :

2021_ECHR

.....to have an example of how a Senator, like Philippe BAUER, has transformed the function of a federal judge into that of a lackey of those who choose them and elect them. Philippe BAUER asks these lackeys chosen by the political parties to cover organized crime (state corruption by influence peddling, which cannot be eliminated without independent federal Judges).

Karin Keller SUTTER knows that the Federal Councillors have taken the Oath to respect the Constitution and its Values independently of the parties, which are associations comparables to masonic lodges, or the FSA.SA.

She knows that the Federal Council has the obligation to ensure access to independent federal judges. She knows how Philippe BAUER uses federal judges to cover up organized crime.

Since the 95% of Swiss are not affiliated with political parties, the Federal Council must recommend the acceptance of the justice initiative so that lawyers belonging to the 95% of the population, who are not affiliated with a party, can become federal judges with a random election to avoid having to become lackeys of a minority of citizens who have to lick the boots of those who elect them by covering corruption cases.

This is the first time that an initiative has allowed the Federal Council to put an end to the control of justice by a minority of citizens, those who are affiliated to political partieses.

Those who want that federal judges to be freed from their role as lackeys of a minority of politicians to cover organized crime must accept the initiative, which is the work of a modern-day Guillaume TELL.

DUTY OF FEDERAL COUNCILLORS UNDER ARTICLE 35 OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION

article 35 : Upholding of fundamental rights

Whoever acts on behalf of the state is bound by fundamental rights and is under a duty to contribute to their implementation.

Among the fundamental rights : lthere are the equality before the law, the prohibition of discrimination, the protection against arbitrary conduct and principle of good faith,...

It is up to everyone to ask themselves whether the Federal Council is not crassly violating these fundamental rights, when it organizes a meeting with the population in a spot to answer all the questions :

When this meeting is discovered on TV, the TSR shows that the Federal Council wanted to meet only those who have a covid certificate, to receive congratulations and not have to answer questions from citizens who do not have the covid certificate.

It is clever, but it is a violation of the fundamental rights of the people... Fortunately, a young person with the Covid certificate did not congratulate the Federal Council. On the contrary, he said that he had come to remind the federal Council of his duty to respect the fundamental rights of all citizens, and that this meeting with the people discriminated against a part of the population that had to buy its fundamental rights with a certificate

To listen :TJ,  7:30 pm October 13, 2021

For the justice initiative, the attitude of the Federal Council is even worse. It grossly violates the fundamental rights of the 95% of the people, by allowing a 5% of the people, to impose their lackeys as federal judges to all the people. As Philippe BAUER has shown, these lackeys are used to cover up organized crime.

To discover also the position of a physician who no longer trusts the Federal Council in the document “ request for the right to answer made to the TSR":

A lire : 211011DE_PC

On November 28, 2021, the independent federal judges initiative is to be voted on.

A "YES" would be the best way to avoid a new "killing of Zug" if we believe the explanations of two experts of this killing.

The author of this initiative is a Guillaume TELL of modern times.

He recalls that the duty of federal judges is to uphold the will of the people enshrined in the Constitution, rather than to protect the interests of corrupt elites !

He highlights that judges chosen by Senators, like Philippe BAUER and corrupt elites, are not independent, but only Ace to cover corruption cases.

To discover this initiative of genius :

TJ 19:30 pm of Sept.30, 2021

Adrian GASSER
Father of the Justice Initiative

Our Guillaume TELL of modern times

Those who want the authorities to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution and the ECHR must vote YES to this initiative for independent federal judges

We have a modern times Hitler, our famous Senator Philippe BAUER, who reduced the role and power of the federal judges to the one of lackeys of the elected reprsentative to crassly violate the fundamental rights of the people guaranteed by the Federal Constitution..

We have one of his colleagues who said that federal judges were under the control of a criminal organization, where Me Foetisch, a dear colleague of Philippe BAUER, is in high place.

We have another colleague of Senator Philippe Bauer, who said he was disgusted by the behaviour of his colleagues. He said that the federal authorities no longer want their judges to respect fundamental rights in their decisions. He said that we need a “Maurice Bavaud” to shoot down a Federal Councillor to put an end to this situation.

We have a Shaman who says that finance must change ...

We now have a Guillaume TELL who comes from finance and who provides the solution to ensure respect for fundamental rights:

"Namely that the Federal Judges must be drawn at random in order  to be independent and no longer be lackeys of a Senator Philippe BAUER and corrupt elites".

This Guillaume TELL simply observed that the Constitution guaranteed the right of our people to have independent federal judges and that this requirement could not be realized with Senator Philippe BAUER and ELECTED who choose as judge only the lackeys who commit to giving them benefits..

We remind that our Senator Philippe Bauer showed brilliantly, that his colleague who says that ...."The Federal Court is infiltrated by a criminal organization where Me Foetisch is high placed,".... is right, see below..

Of a very specific skill required of judges by corrupt elites, which it is not necessary to have for a federal judge

Today many elected reprentatives demand that federal judges have a lackey mentality in order to cover corruption cases.

It should be noted that this competence required by elected representative is not necessary if federal judges are asked to respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution and are elected by lot.

On contrary the answer is true If judges are chosen by corrupt elites: in this case, they cannot be elected without this skill of lackey mentality.  On the other hand, they will not be required to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by our Constitution in their decisions. Only the best in mastering this skill of lackey mentality will be taken.

For those who do not know the exploits of our famous modern times Hitler, Senator Philippe BAUER, it is advisable to read the following judgment where he defended the interests of Foetisch and his criminal organization, which controls the Federal Courtl.

NE State Court Judgment with Philippe BAUER dismissed ...

... he has been dismissed because Mr. Schaller insisted on respecting the fundamental rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution, while Philippe BAUER said that Witness Burnet should have disobeyed the President of the Bar (Bâtonnier).

Philippe BAUER then asked the federal judges, who are not independent, to reverse this judgment, repeating again that the witness Burnet should have disobeyed the Bâtonnier so that the fundamental rights of his client are not violated.....

....federal judges played their role as lackeys of a corrupt elite and reversed this judgment which was respecting fundamental rights, with a judgement which gives advantage to the corrupt elite by violating human rights...

....It is this type of acts of forfeiture that federal judges will no longer be obliged to do if they no longer have to be the lackeys of the Senators to get elected to the Federal Court,.... In the present case this role of lackey is all the more serious that Pierre PENEL, quoted in the judgment, was assassinated on the order of Eric Cottier according to the colleague to Philippe BAUER who revealed the existence of the Criminal Organization that controls the Federal Court.

Those who want to maintain the criminal organization that controls the Federal Court and trample on the rights of our people guaranteed by our Constitution must vote “NO” to the initiative.

But before deciding to do so they must read the following request to the ECHR that all members of the Federal Assembly have received.

2021_CEDH

20 years later, two survivors of the attack testify on television of this unimaginable moment :

Gerhard PFISTER :

« What we have in mind is just the fear of death, and we wait until it finally stops… »

Joseph LANG:

« In my dreams the shots did not appear, but his voice full of hate, and it is such a very masculine voice and I have never heard in my Life, never listened in my Life such a strong hatred »

Tj 19:30 pm of Sept.27, 2021

Gerhard PFISTER
One of the survivors of the attack
Today National Councillor

... it’s important to remember those testimonies....

....because the Press has never spoken of the facts established by two experts of this massacre..

...to read: 210929DE_GP

After 20 years, these facts must no longer be taboo.... they give a completely different vision of the killing of Zug!

These experts were legal professionals who questioned the independence of the Federal Justice.... to deal with corruption related to the actions of a criminal organization!

For the 20 years of commemoration of this tragedy, the children of the elected representatives killed are now adults. They have the right to know the explanations of the expert of this killing who regretted that these orphans did not know why their parent had died.

They also have the right to know the additional information given by another expert of this killing, to the explanations of the first expert..

Of the importance of this commemoration of remembrance highlighted by these two experts who took a stand on the testimony of an elite of citizens dated 17.12.2005:

It is not only to the orphans of the elected representatives of this drama to judge for themselves the facts that led to the death of their parent according to these experienced experts,...

...., but it is also up to all the new generations who demand respect for human rights by our Authorities, to discover the facts established by these senior experts and to act to enforce human rights.

Testimony of an elite of citizens in 2005 made through a request for a parliamentary inquiry on the dysfunction of the Swiss justice and the violation of fundamental rights by the Courts and High Magistrates

In 2005, an elite of citizens noted that the human rights guaranteed by the ECHR are violated in a crass way by the relations that bind the Courts to the brotherhoods of lawyers. They file a request for a parliamentary inquiry into this reduction in the power of the Courts that does not allow the judges to enforce human rights

To read : 051217DP_GC

Facts established by the expert appointed by the Parliament of Vaud

'It is Me François de Rougemont, who receives from the Parliament of Vaud the mandate to deal with this testimony. On October 10, 2006, Me François de Rougemont has a first interview with Dr.Erni on this testimony of the elite of citizens.

He says that the violation of the right to be heard described by this citizen elite testimony could have led to a new killing of Zug before the mandate was given to him.

He then explains that the Zug massacre was caused by the absence of independent judges to try a corruption case in which a certain Robert BISIG was involved.

Zug’s elected representatives were killed because the procedural codes did not allow to judge this type of crime

The Zug killer complained that he couldn’t be heard. This situation was due to the fact that Robert Bisig was a magistrate and that the absence of independent judges does not allow to judge the substantive issues in this type of crime involving professionals of the law.

Further information given by another expert on the Zug massacre on the content of the request for a parliamentary inquiry

In early April 2016, another senior lawyer complemented the facts revealed by the Parliament’s expert on the Zug massacre by claiming that Friedrich LEIBACHER was an “INITIATE”.

Like Me de Rougemont, he explains that the Courts are not independent of the professionals of the law, and that federal judges cannot enforce fundamental rights in their decisions. He further states that Foetisch, cited in the request for a parliamentary inquiry, is highly placed in a criminal organization infiltrated into the state. This criminal organization uses the Federal Court to violate human rights.

He adds that the Zug Killer was an "INITIATE", and he committed suicide to make visible the existence of this criminal organization which violates Human Rights an the Right to be Heard.

He partially succeeded his challenge, as this commemoration has allowed to break the law of silence on the existence of this criminal organization by the testimony of two experts for the orphans and futures generations.

Documents available to the orphans of Zug and to the new generations who demand the respect of fundamental rights by our elected representatives and our Courts :

It is enough to read the chronological journal of this website with the archives to understand the scope of the statements of the expert of the Vaudois Parliament and of the expert who revealed the existence of this criminal organization.

To consult :

http://www.swisstribune.org/2/f/new.html

and :

the archives

Everyone can verify that until today nothing has changed as shown brilliantly by Prosecutors like Michael LAUBER, Ruedi MONTANARI, Eric COTTIER.... and federal judges like Claude ROUILLER, etc..

... by the lack of their independence from politicians and the lack of independent supervisory authority, federal judges still do not enforce fundamental rights in their decisions (violation article 35 Constitution).

Special thanks :

Thanks to the survivors of this tragedy for their witness of remembrance,

…..and to the two experts of this massacre for their explanations for the orphans of this drama caused by the violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR by our Authorities,...

These questions are noted in the following document :

To read : 210908DE_IG

RUEDI MONTANARI JOB DESCRIPTION
For those who do not know, Ruedi Montanari is a Deputy General Prosecutor of the Confederation. In 2016, he was a member of the prestigious General Staff of Michael LAUBER. He knew the questions of the Shaman.

He was one of those General Prosecutor that our people, without knowing, finance to violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution with the injunctions of the President of the BAR ( Bâtonniers).

The President of the Synod, the President of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers, the young climate activists and all citizens who demand that the Federal Council uphold the fundamental rights of our people, guaranteed by the Constitution, may verify these facts in the archives of this site dated 11.10.16. To access the archives, click on:

ARCHIVES BEFORE 2019

Like Covid-19, Ruedi Montanari has just made a new wave of human rights violations,

He has just issued a court order which shows his great fidelity to the “Bâtonniers”, showing that the forces of evil exist.

This court order raises a basic question: "how can one appeal to an independent Court assisted by a competent lawyer", if the “Bâtonniers” do not allow its

THE MATTER HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO THE SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR:

To read : 210913DE_HU

It should be noted that the court order of Ruedi Montanari was drafted after Parliamentarians became aware of this case has been filed with the ECHR .... It’s like  the famous procedure of Michael LAUBER (secret meetings without Minutes) was applied before the drafting of this court order...

Ruedi Montanari
A Deputy General Prosecutor of the Confederation who applies brilliantly the practices of Michael LAUBER that terrify our people

In the archives of this website, in the document reference 161010DE_SSon page 3, everyone was able to read the question that a Shaman had asked Dr Erni in 2001:

« sdo you know why we met and why you met Mr. Foetisch?"

It is recalled that this Shaman predicted the attacks of September 11, 2001 in New York.

In this same document, everyone was able to discover the prestigious past of Ruedi MONTANARI, member of the Staff of Michael LAUBER, which Simonetta Sommaruga already knew in 2016.

It is clear to everyone that the Federal Council, which finances Ruedi Montanari with our taxes to violate the fundamental rights of our people, will not be able to keep the trust of our people if it does not react to the actions of this Federal Prosecutor.

The latter seems to be a messenger of the forces of evil straight out of hell!

The importance of shaman questions :

The Shaman had predicted the attacks of September 11 and they happened. This point is inexplicable for the science of Physics. It shows the relevance of the questions of the Shaman which touch on the destiny of Human, which were pointed out in particular to Mrs Simonetta Sommaruga .

It is not excluded that one day physics can explain distortions of time that allow to explain the predictions of a Shaman.

Einstein’s observations that show the existence of gravitational waves, which cannot be seen, are the subject of research to understand the origin of the world. There is currently the « LISA » project with NASA which shows that scientists do not know much about the world and its evolution..... and that these are important issues related to the question of the Shaman.

To listen : RTS REPLAY 7:30 pm of Sept.14, 2021 (LISA Project)

The new wave of human rights violations by Ruedi Montanari shows that finance has not changed. On the contrary, there is a radicalization of prosecutors who want to impose the law of the « Bâtonniers” by falsifying the data observed and established by scientists

In 2001, the Shaman said that finance must change its behaviour so that fundamental rights are no longer violated.

The request filed at the ECHR on the crimes committed with the interventions of the “Bâtonniers” shows that the finance has not changed. Moreover, this radicalization of the Prosecutor Ruedi Montanari to cover organized crime requires a statement by the President of the Synod and the President of the FSA.

The elite of citizens who filed the request for a parliamentary inquiry understood that if a corporate director, who is a lawyer, commits an economic crime and that the “Bâtonnier” prohibits his offences from being investigated, then there is a violation of human rights with a hidden right to the people. Both the President of the Synod and the President of the FSA are concerned by these questions, which relate to the respect of human rights and the questions of the Shaman on their destiny.

The senior lawyer - who became aware of the blackmail on Dr. Erni’s CEO to dismiss Dr. Erni if the latter refused to give in to the demands of “former Bâtonnier” Yves Burnand - explained that he had no other solutions to propose than to have a Federal Councillor killed in order to force Parliament to enforce fundamental rights by judges who make decisions.

Tant la Présidente du Synode que la Présidente de la FSA ne peuvent ignorer que si les Autorités forcent des PDG à limoger leur scientifiques qui refusent de se taire face à la falsification de faits, alors le peuple ne peut plus faire confiance aux rapports de scientifiques présentés par des membres des Autorités.

Today it is up to the President of the FSA and the President of the Synod to take into account the questions of the Shaman to clarify if it is part of their Values that a STATE can dismiss scientists by putting pressure on their CEO, when these scientists do not want to yield to the demands of a criminal organization infiltrated into the state that violates human rights.

It should be noted that if the Federal Prosecutors radicalize themselves to violate human rights, we can only congratulate Ueli Maurer who shows that the principle of collegiality cannot work if the Federal Council wants to impose the law of the “Bâtonniers” on the people..

Apocalypse 13 : 16 : «He causes all, the small and the great, the rich and the poor, and the free and the slave, to be given marks on their right hands, or on their foreheads. »

Apocalypse 13 : 17 : « and that no one would be able to buy or to sell, unless he has that mark, the name of the beast or the number of his name. »

Intervention of a Shaman in 2001 : "She predicts the attacks of September 11 and says that finance must change its behavior to protect human rights"

Request for a parliamentary inquiry in 2005 : Citizens denounce discrimination and violation of human rights with the interventions of Presidents of the BAR (Bâtonniers)

051217DP_GC

Intervention of former Bâtonnier Philippe BAUER in 2010 : He obtains that the Federal Court violates human rights if a lawyer, unique witness of economic crimes, refuses to disobey an injunction of a Bâtonnier

Intervention of a senior lawyer in 2016 : He reveals that a criminal organization is infiltrated in the State. It applies the three A rules: “WEAKEN, IMPOVERISH, SUBJUGATE”, which is a method of war. This rule has the same effect as the mark of the Beast in the Apocalypse. Those who do not respect it are excluded. Foetisch is a senior member of this criminal organization.

Coming of Covid in 2019 : It is as powerful as the interventions of the Bâtonniers and it makes it possible to WEAKEN, IMPOVERISH AND SUBJUGATE human beings by violating their fundamental rights.

Vaccination with a messenger implant in 2021 : what young people and children must think of the restriction of their freedoms if they refuse the messenger implant?

Ueli Maurer
Federal Councillor

To listen : TJ 1930 of 13 September

NOT INFORMING CHILDREN ABOUT COVID ISSUES AS A BIOLOGICAL WEAPON IS CONTRARY TO A PHYSICIST’S ETHIC!

The science of physics does not allow to assert that a vaccine with the technology of nanoparticles does not involve any long-term risk as the Federal Council does.

Children and youth do not have the tools to make a well-informed decision about whether or not to be vaccinated if seniors do not  well inform them of the long-term risks associated with these messenger implants.

They must be invited to read chapter 13 of the Book of Revelation (Apocalypse) so that they can learn for themselves what the mark of the beast is for believers.

They must form their own opinion on this prophecy that was written hundreds of years ago.

Whether they are religious or not, they must ask themselves how a shaman could predict the attacks in New York and they must answer the questions that the shaman asked the leaders of Switzerland.

To read : 210908DE_IG

The Federal Council must explain to them the three A rule, which is familiar to the extraordinary Federal Prosecutor mandated to deal with the crimes committed with the interventions of the Bâtonniers, which the Press did not mention.

They should know that:

1. The President of the Synod, who could rule on the Apocalypse, knows these questions of the Shaman
2. The President of the Swiss Federation of Lawyers, who could rule on the three-A rule, is also familiar with these issues

To reread : 210908DE_IG

The parents of young people must inform them about the existence of this criminal organization that no one dares talk about!!

They must also explain to them the plans of Hitler and those who want to dominate the world with passports differentiating them from others and implants introduced into their bodies.

Risks from nanotechnology, digital technologies and waves

They need to know that nanotechnology can help cure disease, but it can also be used by criminal organizations to control the world with messenger implants that are hidden from the people like the crimes committed with the interventions of the Bâtonniers.

They need to know that Covid-19 could be a biological weapon under the control of a criminal organization or evil forces for believers, whose purpose is to control humanity

They need to know that all particles can react to certain waves. A world completely connected with messenger implants is part of criminal organization projects to weaken, impoverish and selectively subjugate a people.

To make an informed decision on the risks potentially hidden by the Federal Council, they must ask themselves why the Federal Council hid from the people the crimes committed with the injunctions of the bar officers.....

They need to ask themselves what the risk is that they have to take with these messenger implants....

If the members of the criminal organization infiltrated into the state hide to the people the existence of the injunctions of the President of the BAR (Bâtonniers) that allow to violate the human rights,... how could youth and children know if this criminal organization does not hide the existence of a part of a message with military application that would be in the nanoparticle ?

It’s not fiction, it’s the power of new technologies!!

The intervention of the President of the FSA was required !

Birgit Sambeth Glasner
Prresident of the FSA

What is the Conflict of Interest Prohibition?

It is up to the President of the FSA, Ms.Birgit Sambeth Glasner to clarify this notion that have used this senior lawyer, disgusted by the behavior of his colleagues!

Does the interventions of Bâtonniers/ former Bâtonniers of the FSA such as Philippe BAUER or Christian BETTEX,..., violate this principle of prohibition of conflict of interest ?

It is up to the President of the FSA to clarify this point. It is in any case an element of response of an insider to the elite of citizens who filed the request for parliamentary inquiry : 051217DP_GC

to read the letter that was sent to the President of the FSA on 31 August 2021 to understand the threats that may represent for our people, Bâtonniers/ former Bâtonniers such as Senator Philippe BAUER or the State Attorney Christian BETTEX:

210831DE_BS

The question is important since it is the violation of this principle of prohibition of conflict of interest that would have led the magistrate, Eric COTTER, to order the murder of Pierre PENEL, the right-hand man of the President of ICSA, according to this senior lawyer who puts on the hot seat several Bâtonniers.

A suivre !

As a result his CEO is threatened, the physicist receives death threats and he is fired....

A dissident lawyer explains to him that the refusal of a lawyer to disobey the President of the BAR reverses the right.....

There is no longer access to independent tribunals. Public Ministries are forced to serve the interests of a criminal organization and threaten citizens who demand the respect of their fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR

It is not the conception of a physicist’s democracy that the Federal Authorities keep silent on this right hidden from the people

This physicist asked the President of the Swiss Confederation and the Heads of State to take action to ensure that the fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR are respected....

... They are the only ones who can act if a lawyer refuses to disobey the President of the BAR injunctions

See exhibit : 210901DE_IG

The President of the Confederation wants respect in both directions between the parties

In the case of COVID-19, it is up to everyone to appreciate the hidden facts to the people with their risks revealed by mail, which circulates on Facebook, sent by a lawyer to the Federal Council :

210812JS_CF

ON GUY PARMELIN’S CONCEPTION OF DEMOCRACY

To take note of the speech of Guy PARMELIN who expects the parties to respect each other in both directions and who does not appreciate the threats of those who complain of discrimination.

TJ 19h30, September 1st

It should be noted that there are no threats in the above lawyer’s remarks, but observation of discrimination.

Concerning the refusal of a lawyer to disobey the BAR PRESIDENT, Guy PARMELIN knows that it is impossible that a majority of Swiss would be ready to be fired and threatened with death because their lawyer refused to disobey the BAR Pewaisdent, and that the Federal Council does not acts.

He knows that respect for the parties does not allow the Federal Council to ignore this danger to the people, as he could not ignore the danger of covid-19..

Il It should be noted that the elite of citizens, who revealed this case, where a lawyer refuses to disobey the BAR PRESIDENT, do not have the same concept of democracy as those who asked to fire the physicist...

To read : 051217DP_GC

It is likely that Guy PARMELIN could have the same concept of democracy as this elite of citizens if he wants that the parties to respect each other......

...as President of the Confederation, he must be an example so that citizens can trust their authorities.

to read again : 210901DE_IG

To be continued...

See exhibit : 210823DE_UM

Ueli MAURER
Federal Councillor
Minister of Finance

Our Minister of Finance says he is committed to upholding the Values of the Constitution. It should not approve that members of a criminal organization threaten a CEO to fire an employee if the employee does not comply with the requirements of the members of that criminal organization.

He can access details of the case, like the entire Exhibit 11 of the file sent to the ECHR. This exhibit should make shudder all citizens who expect the State to finance prosecutors who respect the Constitution rather than members of a criminal organization infiltrated into the State!

To be continued !

Among scientists and physicists in particular, information is controlled at the source.

This is done in a more thorough manner as there is a risk of conflict of law and interest.

We spoke directly to the person concerned so that the information could not be distorted.

See exhibit 210817DE_CE

Me Maurice ROPRAZ
Fribourg State Councillor

Each litigant is invited to take note of the request for a parliamentary inquiry which describes practices that make people shudder, as did Me Maurice ROPRAZ:

to read : 051217DP_GC

....and to answer the following question :

How can a State Councillor affirm that the fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR are respected if :

(1) The President of the BAR, Me Philippe Richard, can prevent the filling of a complaint against Patrick Foetisch who violated the copyright

(2) The President of the BAR; Me Christian BETTEX can prevent Witness Burnet from testifying

.....it is important to know that this right does not exist for the people! It is the law of the Initiates or that of a criminal organization as described by the dissident lawyer !

The explanation of the chilling practices described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry :

The complainant Adel Michael did not know the contents of his criminal complaint, because the President of the BAR/ former President of the BAR, Yves BURNAND, lawyer of Adel MICHAEL had written a false denunciation which was used to make professional blackmail to Dr.Erni to protect Me Foetisch..

Each litigant is invited to look at Exhibit 11, which is a recording taken by a private detective. This recording shows this professional blackmail by strangers over Dr ERNI’s CEO... Among them there is in any case the magistrate Eric COTTIER,.... who knew that Yves Burnand had made a false denunciation...

Extract Exhibit 11 (requête CEDH2021)

After having read these two pieces, the fellow lawyer to Me Maurice ROPRAZ said: "You have to deal with a criminal organization, I have only one solution to propose to you to force the highest authorities of the country to enforce fundamental rights and put an end to the actions of this criminal organization:

We must have a Federal Councillor killed.

Me Maurice ROPRAZ has just confirmed that there are no other solutions, .... However, its function as Councillor of State and its Oath obliges him to respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR!

The Swiss Constitution is the Supreme Right. All lower Rights must respect it.

The Constitution gains its values from Almighty God, quoted in the Constitution. Quote :

"Preamble
In the name of God Almighty,

The Swiss people and cantons...."

Link to full text

Is the Almighty God of the Constitution:  the God of the BAR PRESIDENTS , former BAR PRESIDENTS, or GENERAL PROCURATORS, such as Senator Philippe BAUER, Me Claude ROUILLER, Me Christian BETTEX, Michael LAUBER, Eric COTTIER, etc.?.

BAR PRESIDENT
FORMER BAR PRESIDENT
SENATOR PHILIPPE BAUER

One of the leaders of the Liberal Party who, in the name of the Almighty God of the Federal Constitution, obtained from the Federal Court, a judgment which states in substance that the lawyer of a litigant must disobey the injunctions of the PRESIDENT OF THE BAR so that the fundamental rights of his client are not violated!

This judgment concerned the prohibition made by the PRESIDENT OF THE BAR, Christian BETTEX, on the key witness to testify in the following parliamentary inquiry request : 051217DP_GC

The letter of August 2nd addressed to the Synod did not go unanswered. The Evangelical Church acknowledged its receipt and undertook to respond! (210802DE_PS)

After the BAR PRESIDENTS, former BAR PRESIDENTS, our prestigious General PROSECUTORS, our COUNCILLOR of States, our Authorities presented the Values of the Almighty God whom they serve, the elite of citizens who filed the request for parliamentary investigation entitled «Justice Indignant» will finally have an answer from the Church on the Values of the Almighty God whom it represents and who in theory is the one who is quoted in the Constitution!!!

OUR PEOPLE WILL FINALLY KNOW :

If the Values of the Almighty God of the prestigious Senator Philippe BAUER are the Values of the God of the Constitution according to the Reformed Church!

If the Values of the Almighty God of the Prestigious Prosecutor, Michael LAUBER, who allows him to conduct interviews without Minutes, without declaring his terrible illness, which is colletive amnesia, are indeed the Values of the God of the Constitution according to the Reformed Church!

Same observation for Jean-Marc Schwenter and Jacques Antenen, must watch :020616DE_JS

If the Values of the Almighty God of the Prestigious Prosecutor, Eric COTTIER, which allows him to have assassinated according to a dissenting lawyer the Director of ICSA, and to send Court Orders (which he probably never wrote), with a procedure that does not exist according to a jurist of the CAP, to deify Me Patrick Foetisch, President of the Board of Directors of ICSA, are indeed the Values of the God of the Constitution according to the Reformed Church! !

If the only solution, given by a dissident lawyer to enforce human rights by the highest authorities in the country, is to have a Maurice Bavaud who kills a Federal Councillor!!

It is essential that the Reformed Church take a stand on the Values of her God which is supposed to be the one of the Constitution

It is recalled that this lawyer proposed this solution after having been acquainted with the practices that make people shudder, described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry, see Exhibit : 051217DP_GC

….…as well as one of the recordings taken by a private investigator that showed the professional blackmail of a CEO by strangers concealed by the practices that make this request for a parliamentary inquiry shudder, read::

extract Exhibit 11 ( application to ECHR2021)

…all aimed at hiding the assassination of Pierre PENEL by order of the magistrate Eric COTTIER according to this dissident lawyer

This dissident lawyer explained that : Maurice Bavaud was a Swiss Catholic, devout practitioner who had decided to shoot Hitler to end human rights violations under the Third Reich.

..... As it stands, no Swiss personality has proposed a solution other than the one of the dissident lawyer to put an end to the climate of terror described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry made by BAR PRESIDENTS and former BAR PRESIDENTS such as Philippe BAUER, Christian BETTEX,..., who are modern-day Hitler!

To be continued !

The law of silence is never a solution for those who demand respect for human rights

Evelyne Borer
Synod President

Not an ordinary thing, it acts in the name of the Church

The alert is launched

To read : 210802DE_PS

To be continued

Since a lawyer proposed a solution to stop the actions of members of the criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament...

...All Swiss citizens have a very relevant solution recommended by an experienced lawyer to enforce their fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR

The solution must only kill one person, unless we need reminders.

It’s better than the best COVID vaccine, and it doesn’t violate citizens' freedoms, even Federal Councillors have the right to speak!

It is not the former BAR President, Philippe BAUER, nor the former BAR PRESIDENT, Christian BETTEX, who must take the risk of dying, in the solution proposed by their colleague, the dissident lawyer,,...

The Federal Council has all the cards in hands !

Me Christian BETTEX
Former BAR PRESIDENT
Vaud State Lawyer
Vaud Parliament Lawyer

... THIS WOULD BE A SEVERE BLOW TO FORMER BAR PRESIDENTS, SUCH AS, PHILIPPE RICHARD, YVES BURNAND, CHRISTIAN BETTEX, CLAUDE ROUILLER ( ?), PHILIPPE BAUER, NICOLAS CHARRIÈRE, ETC, AND TO THEIR FELLOW LAWYERS, THE FEDERAL JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS GENERAL SUCH AS ERIC COTTIER, MICHAEL LAUBER, etc,..!

Reminder of the practices that make people shudder

To Reread the request for a parliamentary inquiry : 051217DP_GC

Namely that : Me de Rougemont, the expert of the Vaudois Parliament, said that the President of the Board of Directors of ICSA, Me Foetisch, committed his crimes using the fact that Dr Erni did not have access to independent courts of the Order of Lawyers, a gap in implementing legislation for which Parliament was responsible.

Must watch : 070828DP_GC

namely that : Me Rudolf Schaller asked the Court of Neuchâtel "to declare by judgment that the prohibition made to the witness Burnet to testify, by the President of the BAR, Me Christian BETTEX, was an unlawful act" in the context described by this request for parliamentary inquiry...

....namely that : the Cantonal Court had, by judgment, given reason to Me Rudolf SCHALLERR

To reread the exhibit  : jugement NE

….namely that: the President of the BAR, Me Christian BETTEX, could not ignore that the President of the BAR, Philippe RICHARD, quoted in the request for investigation, had prohibited the name of the Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA, Me Patrick Foetisch, to be included in a criminal complaint, while he had violated the copyright!

...namely that: the President of the BAR, Christian BETTEX could not have been unaware that Pierre PENEL had died during the proceedings conducted by the magistrate instructor Eric COTTIER, in frightening circumstances, where the Attorney General Jean-Marc Schwenter and the supervisory authority of the judges, Jacques Antenen, suffered from the terrible illness of Michael Lauber, that is collective amnesia: they did interviews without Minutes that they did not remember...

To reread exhibit :020616DE_JS

Namely that : the dissident lawyer, who knew all these exhibits, gave a beam of serious clues that Pierre PENEL died assassinated on order of the magistrate Eric COTTIER....

Reminder of the answers given by the former BAR Presidents to the people on this violation of access to independent Courts that the Federal Council can no longer ignore :

... the former BAR PRESIDENT, Philippe BAUER, asked the Federal Court to pronounce a judgment, in which he quashed the judgment of Neuchâtel obtained by Me Rudolf SCHALLER with the following motivation : the witness Burnet should have disobeyed the BAR PRESIDENT, Me Christian BETTEX, so that the fundamental rights of his client, Dr Erni, have not been violated by the Courts,

...the federal judges, who do not have the independence and competence to judge this case, have agreed with the former BAR PRESIDENT, Philippe BAUER, rather than recuse themselves for violation of access to independent Courts....

...The former BAR PRESIDENT, Me Christian BETTEX, acting as an advocate of Parliament, applied to the Federal Court for a judgment, where the federal judges forbids Me Rudolf SCHALLER to be able to represent his client in front of the Parliament for the crimes committed with the violation of the access to Courts independent of the Chamber of lawyers...

...the former BAR PRESIDENT, Me Christian BETTEX, made this application to the TF when he knew that Me Schaller had obtained from the Court of Neuchâtel, the judgment which said that the BAR PRESIDENT, Me Christian BETTEX, i.e. himself, had made an illegitimate act by prohibiting Me Burnet from testifying,...he knew that this was the judgment that the former BAR PRESIDENT, Philippe BAUER, had overturned by the Federal Court......

....... the federal judges, who do not have the independence and competence to judge this case, have cleverly given reason to the former BAR PRESIDENT, Me Christian BETTEX, rather than recuse themselves for violation of access to independent courts of the Chamber of Lawyers...

It was then that a dissident lawyer, who claims that the Parlement is infiltrated by members of a criminal organization, gave a solution to the Federal Council, or the Swiss people, to put an end to the actions of this criminal organization.

An extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, mandated to deal with these crimes committed with the injunctions of the BAR PRESIDENT, at the origin of the death of Pierre PENEL, has just given reason to this dissident lawyer, by saying that: he had no jurisdiction to oppose an injunction from a President of the Bar

The Federal Council can propose other solutions that will be communicated to the ECHR, at least one already exists for Swiss citizens whose fundamental rights are violated by members of this criminal organization!

The solution was proposed by a lawyer who said that words no longer serve any purpose! ….here the words still serve to raise the alarm about the violation of fundamental rights and this lawyer had not thought about it!

See exhibit : 210727DE_CF

« FULFILMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (title of article 35) »

Article 35 of the Federal Constitution states that :

« anyone who assumes a duty of the State is bound to respect fundamental rights and to contribute to their fulfilment »

How is it that the Former President of the BAR, like the Senator Philippe BAUER, or like the President of the Commission for the supervisory of Justice of the justice council (CMAG), Nicolas CHARRIÈRE, do not respect fundamental rights ?

Why was the file for complaint againts federal Prosecutor Jacques RAYROUD, received by the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, dealing with the practices described in the request for a parliamentary investigation, not accessible to the justiciables, during the investigation?

What was in this file, which must be hidden to the justiciable and the massmedia ???

The question is submitted to the President of the Supervisory Authority of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Confederation :

To read : 210721DE_HU

Hanspeter USTER

President of the Supervisory Authority of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Confederation

"YOU NEED A MAURICE BAVAUD WHO KILLS A FEDERAL COUNCILLOR?

...FOR WHICH CASE DID HE COMMIT TO DO SO?

Reminder of the practices that make people shudder

To reread the request for a parliamentary inquiry : 051217DP_GC

The questions that need to be asked :

Why did a former President of the BAR, like Nicolas Charrière, President of a Supervisory Commission of the Judicial Council, validate this solution of the dissident lawyer?

To read : 210712DE_CM

Why did Nicolas Charrière not propose to set up a supervisory body, independent of the Lawyers Association or Chamber of advocates, to monitor that persons assuming a State task have respected fundamental rights in their decisions ?

Why did Philippe BAUER ask the Federal Court to confirm in a ruling that a lawyer must disobey the President of the BAR so that the fundamental rights of his client are not violated ?

Why the dissident lawyer is convinced that Pierre PENEL was murdered at the request of General Prosecutor Eric COTTIER ?

What motive did General Prosecutor Eric Cottier have to be constraint to murder Pierre PENEL, according to the dissident lawyer ?

What serious indications of evidence of guilt did the dissident lawyer give ?

Why has no parliament, nor any Council of State, proposed a solution other than that of the dissident lawyer to force the Federal Authorities to enforce the fundamental rights of persons assuming a state task? ?

Reminder

In 2007, the expert of the Vaudois Parliament, Me De Rougemont, explained that the Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA, Me Foetisch, member of the Lawyers Association, could not have committed his crimes if the Authorities had given access to independent Courts.

Since then, no solution has been proposed by the State and federal authorities to remedy this situation, with the exception of the solution proposed by the dissident lawyer.

=> an appeal to the ECHR will be filed to explain this situation

To this end, the Swiss Authorities were again asked to specify for the ECHR whether they have another solution than to have a Federal Councillor killed so that Parliament gives access to independent Courts.

See exhibit : 210721DE_HU

To be continued...

The role of the President of the BAR is poorly known to the people.....

....the role of the Judicial Council, which claims to be a supervisory authority, is even more poorly known,...

... as shown by one of its members, Me Nicolas Charrière, Former President of the BAR and Chairman of the Judicial Supervisory Commission

To read : 210712DE_CM

Former President of the BAR,
Me Nicolas Charrière,
Chairman of the Judicial Supervisory Commission of the Judicial Council (CMAG),

Member of the Swiss Federation of Adovcates (FSA)

IT WAS UNIMAGINABLE THAT IT WOULD TAKE AN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE BAR TO FILE A COMPLAINT AGAINST THE PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ICSA, BECAUSE HE WAS A MEMBER OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION.

UNDER THESE CIRCUMSTANCES, IT IS NO MORE SURPRISING THAT A FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE BAR, MEMBER OF THE FSA, PUTS THE INTERESTS OF HIS BROTHERHOOD BEFORE RESPECT FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND THE RESPECT OF THE LIFE OF A FEDERAL COUNCILLOR

Role of the President of the BAR and former Presidents of the BAR

We have seen that the Magistrate, Sonia Bulliard Grosset, should recuse herself so as not to endanger the life of a Federal Councillor.

To reread the open letter : 210705DE_SG

... to observe in this open letter, on page 2, point 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d, that the main actors responsible for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution are Presidents of the BAR or former Presidents of the BAR. They are all concerned by the practices that make you shudder observed by the elite of citizens who filed the request for a parliamentary inquiry,

To reread the request for a parliamentary inquiry : 051217DP_GC

....They all impose the law of silence, which is an initiates’s law according to the dissident lawyer, who met Dr. Erni in April 2016.

This lawyer had described another law of the Initiates, which was used, according to him, by members of a masonic lodge.

This law, for "untouchable" personalities, consisted of :

"To assert the opposite of reality with sufficient force, invoking their Title and their Function to affirm that they tell the Truth that no one dares to challenge them, while they say the opposite of the truth"

The role of the Judicial Council (CMAG)

It presents itself as a Supervisory Authority, but it is not according to the criteria given by Me de Rougemont. See page 4 of the open letter where, in reviewing the operation of the Federal Constitution, Me de Rougemont had emphasized that the Supervisory Authority must respect the principle of separation of powers...

See also Exhibit 210630DE_IG

.... in reality the Judicial Council by its structure which links the different powers with the laws of the Initiates cannot respect the separation of powers. On the contrary, it is the ideal tool to do interviews without Minutes, with the method of Michael LAUBER to deceive the people.

To observe that Nicolas Charrière knows that the Swiss Constitution and the ECHR guarantee the right to an effective recourse (appeal) to an independent and competent Court....

He also knows that his colleague, Me de Rougemont, explained that there was no separation of power between the Chamber of advocates and the Courts. He knows that there was therefore no competent and independent Court to judge the damages caused by the injunctions and directives of the President  of the BAR.

He lies with a strongly cynical way by insinuating that Dr Erni was able to appeal before a Tribunal (by omitting the term independent), while he knows that his right to appeal before an independent Tribunal, which can take into account the damages caused by the injunctions of the BAR president, was violated.

See exhibit : 210628CM_DE

Moreover, as a former President of the BAR, he knows that Me Patrick Foetisch, the President of the Board of Directors of ICSA, commits his crimes with Presidents of the BAR and Former President of the BAR who force his victims to appeal to courts which are not independent and are censored by the BAR Association.

The example of Sonia Bulliard Grosset who asserts that the Court of La Broye has never paid any money to Foetisch, with its decision to put in danger of death a Federal Councillor, attests this violation of fundamental rights...

...it is a practice that would have made the elite of citizens, who filed the request for a parliamentary inquiry, shudder,....

.... it shows the absence of an independent Supervisory Authority that can ensure that persons performing a State task respect fundamental rights in their decisions. (Article 35 Federal Constitution)

... Everybody can observe that the Judicial Council, or at least Me Charrière, could belong to this masonic lodge whose members claim the opposite of reality...it is up to him to specify it.

210705DE_SG

210712DE_CM

Patrick Foetisch, the Great Master of Initiates, is fought by a senior Colleague with a project submitted to the Federal Council

"It is not trivial to have a Senior lawyer who undertakes to have a Federal Councillor killed if Parliament does not want to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution"

Me Patrick Foetisch, one of the untouchable leaders of a powerful criminal organization infiltrated in the State, found a strong opponent in his colleague, the dissident lawyer, another Initiate who does not share his Values.

Members of the Criminal Organization of Patrick Foetisch, including Senator Philippe BAUER, Michael LAUBER, Eric COTTIER, François DANTHE, etc.. ,  apply the old Sixties formula :

« Your Money or Your Life »

... to create a climate of terror and to violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution.

We note that the dissident lawyer, who wants to respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution, had the brilliant idea of reversing this formula to counter the climate of terror that the members of this criminal organization are causing, with the formula :

"Give me your Life or Respect fundamental Rights"

Me PATRICK FOETISCH
THE GREAT MASTER OF INITIATES

This untouchable idol of the Order of Lawyers, one of the great masters of the criminal organization, found an strong opponent in the dissident lawyer !

With his runner-up, Senator Philippe BAUER,..

... they could be dropped by members of the Federal Council,...

... who do not accept that the members of this criminal organization, members of the judicial network, use professional blackmail and slanderous denunciation to violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution l

The President of the Tribunal, Sonia Bulliard Grosset, respected her Oath to honour the Constitution of Initiates. It does not allow her to respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution.

It is requested by open letter to the President of the “Court de la Broye” to recuse herself, so that her Oath to respect the Constitution of Initiates, which obliges her to violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution, does not endanger the life of a Federal Councillor l

Read the open letter here : 210705DE_SG

This open letter was communicated to the Federal Police with additional details......

Einstein once said :

"Those who have the privilege of knowing, have the duty to act !"

... when you have the privilege of knowing, you don’t have to be a physicist, like Einstein to act !...

.... This is the magnificent lesson given by the dissident lawyer, this Initiate colleague of Patrick Foetisch, for all the members of the Order of Lawyers,,...

... and also for members of Parliament who use the Law of Silence in the face of crimes committed by this criminal organization infiltrated into the state

Philippe Bauer, runner-up to the Great Master of Initiates, could become vulnerable

We note that the formula invented by the dissident lawyer, namely :

"Give me your Life or Respect fundamental Rights"

...could also make vulnerable Senator Philippe BAUER, prestigious runner-up to Patrick Foetisch, who represents the Liberal Party’s values in Parliament.

It is recalled that this Senator, acting as former President of the Bar, was instructed by another President of the Bar, Me Christian BETTEX, to obtain a judgment of the Federal Court that makes invincible Patrick Foetisch.

Me Philippe BAUER knew that Patrick Foetisch committed his crimes with the Presidents of the Bar who were  preventing the Courts to investigate his crimes.

To be reread : 051217DP_GC

He obtained a ruling from Initiates Judges of the Federal Court which says that the key witness, forbidden to testify by the President of the Bar, should have disobeyed the President of the Bar so that his client, Dr.Erni, does not have his fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution that are violated !....

.... ON JUNE 22, SENATOR BAUER AGAIN ANNOUNCED HIS INTENTION TO VIOLATE THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION...

...whereas the Initiates of Parliament, in order to get the people to accept on June 13 the “MPT”, the terrorism law, have affirmed that this law could not be used against peaceful activists,….

...see comments dated May 26, below !

…. as soon as the law was accepted, Senator Philippe BAUER announced that the Initiates of Parliament no longer intend to respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution,...

... and that his intention is to use this law against peaceful activists.

Recommended listening : TJ 19h30 du 22 juin 2021

... ... it is observed that the dissident lawyer, who had presented himself as a member of a resistance group to enforce the Values of the Constitution, showed the dangerousness of Senator Philippe BAUER...

... by saying that in order to stop the activities of this criminal organization, he has only one way to propose that can be summed up in :

"Give me your Life or Respect fundamental Rights "

051217DP_GC

210705DE_SG

According to the rights guaranteed by the ECHR, an act of forfeiture made by a General Prosecutor cannot be invoiced to the victims to cover up : “the practices that make you shudder, described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry!

Read : 210630DE_GC

Mme Sonya Butera
Vaud Parliament President

Neither the President of Vaud Parliament, nor the deputies,  Initiates or not, can ignore what was hidden in the "Practices that make you shudder", described in the request for parliamentary investigation

Read : 210622DE_GC

Any uninitiated citizen understands that if the laws of the Initiates allow unidentified assaillants to force a CEO to dismiss a director, if the latter refuses to give in to blackmail, exercised by members of the judicial network, to cover the alleged murder of Pierre PENEL at the request of Eric Cottier, as well as the offences of the President of ICSA:

Justice is under the control of modern-day Hitler.

The parliamentarians of Vaud can thank the General Prosecutor Eric Cottier and the Prosecutor François Danthe for having made public these methods that they apply to circumvent the respect of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.

It is recalled that a dissident lawyer called these methods: "the laws of the Initiates""

Prosecutor François Danthe wants to establish a climate of terror, as under Nazi Germany, for those who expect that the Vaud justice respects the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.

Read : 210630DE_GC

Just because federal justice is decapitated does not mean that the Prosecutor has the right to violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution. Even if the Prosecutor François Danthe does it by esprit de corps with the General Prosecutor Eric COTTIER,…, the fact remains that the practices that make us shudder, described by an elite of citizens, exist !

These practices are the work of a criminal organization infiltrated in Parliaments as the extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, mandated to deal with the crimes committed with the injunctions of the Bâtonniers, gave evidence on February 16, 2021.

Read : 051217DP_GC

Nobody in Parliament today can ignore the professional blackmail exercised by members of the judicial system that was concealed by the practices that make us shudder  described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry

Read : 210622DE_GC

The functioning of the Constitution and the duty of the Supervisory Authority to be set up by elected officials, reviewed with the expert of Parliament

Me François de Rougemont had explained that:

It is the duty of the Supervisory Authority - which must respect the principle of separation of powers - to ensure that Article 35 of the Constitution is respected by anyone who assumes a State task

Read : 210630DE_IG

Me de Rougemont gave the elected officials the conditions that a control authority must meet in order for it to be independent and effective! !

Einstein said : "Those who have the privilege of knowing have the duty to act !"

The uninitiated members of Parliament now know : what the Initiates of Parliament are doing, and how an independent and effective supervisory authority can be set up with the recommendations of their expert, Me François de Rougemont

The key point is that :

The Supervisory Authority has the task of verifying that the persons entrusted with a State task respect fundamental rights in their decision (article 35).

It is the contrary to verify that the persons entrusted with a task of the State apply procedures which serve to circumvent the respect of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution as have so well shown Prosecutors Michael LAUBER, Eric COTTIER, François Danthe, etc. (Current situation).

210622DE_GC

210630DE_GC

210630DE_IG

Represent the people and the Values of the Swiss Constitution, promote communication, know how to listen, understand and communicate difficult decisions protecting the freedoms and rights of the citizens of our people...

...is an unusual quality for a Federal Councillo, …..

To note that it is the Values of the Swiss people that have been defended by a Guillaume Tell, a Winkelried, which oppose those of a Senator Philippe BAUER, a Michael LAUBER, an Eric COTTIER, ...

Read : 210623DE_GP

Fortunately, some parliamentarians are still aware of the values of the Swiss people that they must represent.

To listen to the comnents of the Councillor of States Pirmin Bischof and those of Christophe Levrat.

TJ 19h30 of June 20 th, 2021

Guy PARMELIN
Swiss President Confederation

"he’s good as he is "

close to the people

he knows how to listen

he understands

he acts by promoting dialogue

When Guy Parmelin is interviewed by the TSR about how he welcomed two of the world’s leader, we hear a President of Confederation, who modestly says that he was in the right place at the right time.

He recalls that his role as President of the Confederation is to represent the values of the Swiss people !

TJ 19h30 of June 17 th,2021

If the prestigious man of law, that is Michael LAUBER, had been President of the Confederation, and if he had explained to Joe BIDEN and Valdimir POUTING that for him the Values of a Swiss Prosecutor, is to make interviews without PV, .....

...the Values of the Swiss People would not have been represented.

Similarly if his colleague, the Prosecutor Eric COTTIER, had been President of the Swiss Confederation, and had explained to Joe Biden, the method he applies so that the litigants do not receive his Court orders, ....

.... the Values of the Swiss People would not have been represented. This although, if Eric Cottier had explained to Joe Biden that a lawyer attributed to him the prestigious decision to have liquidated Pierre Penel, and the death of Pierre Penel justifies the invention of this procedure, which allows skillfully to hide this murder !

ERIC COTTIER
General Prosecutor

... to resign to escape his oath to respect the Constitution of Initiates ...

Read : 210616DE_EC

Message of the Shaman addressed to Eric COTTIER and members of the High Authorities of the Country, whose Oath does not allow them to respect human rights:

Do you know that in the face of death, you will be alone with full responsibility for the acts of your Life ?

With justice completely paralyzed, ...

ARCHIVES Hebdo du 7.04.2016

...by magistrates and elected officials, who have taken the Oath to respect the "CONSTITUTION OF INITIATES", ...who are unable to enforce the fundamental rights of the people guaranteed by the FEDERAL CONSTITUTION, ... which endanger the future of new generations by mocking young people with the proposal of a number of means which do not allow them to obtain respect for their fundamental rights...

See TJ 19h30 of 11 June 2021

... judges who have taken the Oath to respect the CONSTITUTION OF INITIATES, such as General Prosecutor, Eric Cottier and, judges of the Federal Court, may end the violation of the human rights of new generations and ESCAPE THEIR OATH TO RESPECT THE CONSTITUTION OF INITIATES, by resigning

Read : 210616DE_EC

Young people and elected officials, who want the highest authorities of the country to restore respect for fundamental rights guaranteed by the FEDERAL CONSTITUTION, ...

...may also ask the magistrates, whose oath to respect the Constitution of Initiates does not allow them to respect the Federal Constitution, ... to resign.

Difference between Federal Constitution and Constitution of Initiates

The General Prosecutor, Eric COTTIER, who made the Oath to respect the Constitution of Initiates, explained that he uses a procedure to send his Court Orders that respects the Oath of the Constitution of Initiates, ... but which is an illegal act and an act of forfeiture under the Oath to uphold the Federal Constitution.

Reread : 210616DE_EC

It is also up to the elected representatives of Parliaments to break the silence on the acts of forfeiture of these magistrates, whose oath to respect the Constitution of Initiates compels them to violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution

... it is up to the Federal Council and the Cantonal State Council to take measures to protect citizens...

WHY ARE WICKED LAWS NOT FOUND IN THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION

In 2017, the President of the Parliament of Fribourg, Bruno BOSCHUNG communicated to Dr Adrian URWYLER the request for a parliamentary inquiry:

read : 051217DP_GC

…with the following question : How was it possible to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution with the injunctions of the Bar Presidents, which reduced the power of the Courts?

Dr Adrian URWYLER, President of the Judicial Council, did not want to explain how citizens could have known that an authorization from the President of the Bar Association was required to lodge a complaint against the President of the Board of Directors of ICSA, member of the Chamber of Lawyers, who had violated the copyright.

Dr Adrian URWYLER did not want to explain why the President of the Bar had the right to prohibit a criminal complaint against the President of ICSA.

However, everyone can control that the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution were violated by this injunction of the President of the BAR who, by preventing the filing of a complaint against a PDG lawyer, neutralized the functioning of the judiciary.

The answer is now known and quite simple:

it is because it exists :

A CONSTITUTION OF INITIATES, WHICH IS NOT THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION,

…BUT THE GENERAL CONSTITUTION HIDDEN FROM THE PEOPLE BY THE INITIATES

Dr Adrian URWYLER
Former President of the Judicial Council

He knew the two Constitutions, that of Initiates (red face) and the Federal Constitution (green face), but he had no right to speak about the Constitution of Initiates, hence his silence.

He never revealed to the people the existence of this Constitution of Initiates, which allows a Prosecutor General like Eric COTTIER to use the procedure of Initiates which says that: :

"if he sends an Court Order by mail A, (which he may never have written), and the post office has not returned the mail A, then he has the formal proof that the defendant has received the Court Order."

IT TOOK ALAIN BERSET’S REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATION FROM THE FEDERAL POLICE, SO THAT EVERYONE COULD DISCOVER THAT SENATOR PHILIPPE BAUER AND THE INITIATES HAD ANOTHER CONSTITUTION, NAMELY THE CONSTITUTION OF INITIATES

The job of physicists is to observe a system and to establish the laws, which make it possible to describe and use it.

In physics, when a law does not fully describe what we observe, we add a unseen dimension to explain the inexplicable. Thus, the laws of Newtonian mechanics became a special case of the laws of relativistic mechanics, which supplemented them.

The application of the Federal Constitution, which does not allow to explain the judgments of the Federal Court

The Courts are not independent of the Bar Association, nor do they have the power to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution":

"The Courts are not independent of the Bar Association, nor do they have the power to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution".

read: 051217DP_GC

Observations provided by three senior lawyers explaining why the Federal Court’s judgments do not respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution : 

Me de Rougemont (Parliament Expert) :
Courts are not independent of the Chamber of Lawyers

L'avocat dissident (MBA-HEC Conference Observer)
The state is infiltrated by a criminal organization
There are Initiates who can’t talk about it

Dr Adrian URWYLER (Judicial Council President)
He’s an initiate, he can’t talk about it.

Observations provided by three members of Parliament that show that Initiates must respect another Constitution, namely the Constitution of Initiates

Senator Philippe BAUER (Councillor of State)
He is an Initiate: he has obtained from the Federal Court his wicked law, which states in substance that: "a lawyer must disobey the injunctions of the President of the Bar, so that the fundamental rights of his client, guaranteed by the Federal Constitution, are not violated"

Philippe Schwab (Parliament General Secretary)
He is an Initiate. He said he had been given the mandate to deal with the claim for compensation for the damage caused by the injunctions of the BAR Presidents, and he could not answer the questions in compliance with the Article 35 of the Federal Constitution.

Sir Bruno Boschung (Former FR Parliament President)
He was not an Initiate, but a parliamentarian. He found that the Courts could not enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution with the injunctions of the President of the BAR. When he asked Dr Adrian URWYLER, one of the experienced legislators, for an explanation., he could not get an answer on this hidden laws to the people.

From the response provided by the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, mandated by the Supervisory Authority of the Public Ministry of Confederation, to deal with the crimes committed with injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR described in the request for parliamentary investigation :

He gave evidence of the existence of a Constitution other than the Federal Constitution : "the Constitution of Initiates"  which contains laws hidden from the people, but known to the Initiates. For example :

“Prosecutors have no jurisdiction to judge the obligation of a lawyer to override a client’s defence against any directions or injunctions of a President of the BAR”

This "Constitution of Initiates" brings together the wicked laws that serve to circumvent the respect of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution to give advantages to Initiates

It is the general Constitution, hidden from the people, set up by the Initiates of Parliament, that the Federal Court must apply.

It explains all the practices that make people shudder, described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry..

It is by applying this Constitution that the Federal Court confirmed that a lawyer must disobey the injunctions of a BAR  President, so that the fundamental rights of his client are not violated.

It is also by applying this Constitution that the Federal Criminal Court can charge judgments that serve to circumvent the respect for fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

This Constitution of Initiates allows the Federal Court to reverse the rules of law of the Federal Constitution..

For example, judges may judge their own recusal, to read: 210525DE_CM

... the induction of justice in error is not a crime, but a quality, to be discovered: 210604DE_DB

... failure to respond to urgent letters is a basic rule, it should be noted : 210606DE_CM

In short, evidence of the existence of :

THIS CONSTITUTION OF INITIATES

completely changed our perception of federal justice....

... It will allow to better understand the behavior of our Prosecutors as Michael Lauber, Jacques RAYROUD, ..... Eric COTTIER , ETC

On May 25, the Federal Criminal Court unleashes the war machine by taking advantage of the blocked mandate of Philippe SCHWAB to make an unlawful seizure of 2400 CHF for his act of forfeiture…..

For the Master Agreement with Europe, the Federal Council has shown that it does not get its decisions imposed by Parliament, but that it takes them according to its values..

Recommended listening

TJ 19h30 du 31.5.2021

For crimes committed with the injunctions of the President of the BAR, Federal Council must simply ensure the respect of the fundamental rights of the people guaranteed by the Federal Constitution

Guy PARMELIN
President of the Confederation

Albert EINSTEIN said :

 Those who have the privilege of knowing have the duty to act

The judges of the TPF have just confirmed that they no longer want to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution, as announced by the dissident lawyer in 2016.

The elements, established by the dissident lawyer, in turn become obvious since the extraordinary Federal Prosecutor gave evidence of the existence of this infiltrated organization in Parliament that the dissident lawyer had described.

See exhibit 210602DE_GP

Prosecutor Eric COTTIER will not challenge the personal conviction of the dissident lawyer cited in index 3 of the above letter.

He has already shown his magnificent Values to serve the interests of criminal organization with the invention of his secure procedure to get proof that litigants have received his Courts Orders.

For the Federal Council, it is recalled that the General Prosecutor, Eric COTTIER, explained that :

“If he sends an Court Order by mail A, which he probably never wrote, and the Post Office does not return it to him, then he has the formal proof that the defendant received it”

For those who want to use this procedure (which cannot be understood by an engineer), please consult the comments dated April 15, 2020 on this site.

Note that a lawyer from the CAP explained why an engineer cannot understand it, see explanation of July 8, 2020 on this site.

...It took 5 years to control the claims of the dissident lawyer and finally, thanks to a question from Federal Councillor Alain Berset, an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor has given evidence of the existence of this alleged criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament described by this dissident lawyer...

See exhibit 161003DE_IG

In 2016, this meeting with the dissident lawyer was unimaginable for an engineer,…..

....today, it has become a reality with the beheading of the Office of the General Prosecutor of the Confederation,...

... and the Federal Criminal Court which confirmed with a magnificent act of forfeiture that they no longer want to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution as affirmed by the dissenting lawyer act….

Now, the Federal Council has all the ropes in hand to act.

See exhibit: 210602DE_GP

A Shaman announced in 2001 that the mission of Federal Council was to operate a change!

Lawyers, including a lawyer from Amnesty International, have raised the alarm about the misleading definition of terrorism that is in this Law.

Each can verify that the jurists, who established the definition of terrorism in this law, do not refer to respect for human rights guaranteed by the Constitution, but to the respect of the State Order imposed by the Presidents of the BAR with the help of magistrates like Michael LAUBER, Eric COTTIER, Jacques RAYROUD,... Claude ROUILLER (former federal judge), etc…. which violates the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution by spreading fear among the people.

Listen to :TJ 19h30 11.05.21

Note that the commander of the Neuchâtel police, Pascal LUTHI, is certainly sincere in his 'interview below, ....

See TJ 19h30 11.05.21

... but Senator Philippe BAUER could show him that the text written in this law says something other than what he believes !

...He could explain to him that this definition of terrorism not only allows to neutralize activists, but also protects criminals who violate the fundamental rights of citizens by spreading fear and using serious threats....

Note that the former chief of the Neuchâtel Police, Olivier Guéniat, who unlike Philippe BAUER, was a great Humanist, could recall from his tomb to Pascal LUTHI, that he chose to commit suicide in order not to have to renounce his Ethical Values.

If one day, Pascal LUTHI must apply this law on terrorism against citizens defending the values of the Constitution, he will have the same conflict of conscience that had the great humanist, former Commander of the Neuchâtel Police, who was Olivier Guéniat.

Pascal LUTHI will remember that Olivier GUÉNIAT, faced with a conflict of Ethical Values, with these misleading laws that he had to apply, chose to commit suicide in order not to have to deny his Values.

The defence of humanist values, which led him to choose his profession, no longer made sense.

Me Philippe BAUER
Senator in Parliament
Big-shot lawyer of Neuchâtel bar
Leading expert on deceptive laws serving members of criminal organizationss

This Senator defends Values to which Olivier Guéniat could not adhere, but to which a police Commander, like Jacques ANTENEN, adheres completely...

To take note of the two definitions of terrorism below and to check the one that the lawyers have put in the law on terrorism:

Definition of Terrorism #1 :

«“Actions intended to influence or modify respect for fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution and likely to be carried out or promoted by serious offences or threats of such serious offences or by the spread of fear”»

Note: this is the definition of terrorism in a rule of law which has a Constitution which provides for the respect of fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR

Definition of Terrorism #2 :

"Actions intended to influence or modify the state order and likely to be carried out or promoted by serious offences or threats of such offences or by the spread of fear"

Note : This is the definition of terrorism in a totalitarian State whose Authorities do not respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the ECHR, or in a State where the judiciary is under the control of a criminal organization

Verification

To check the definition of terrorism in the text of the law on terrorism to be voted:

Listen to : TJ 19h30 11.05.21

 => Each citizen was able to verify that the legal experts in Parliament cleverly did not take definition of terrorism #1, but they did take definition #2 for the terrorism law, which is that of the totalitarian State or of the State where the judicial apparatus is under the control of a criminal organization

EXPLANATIONS THAT SENATOR PHILIPPE BAUER CAN GIVE TO PASCAL LUTHI TO JUSTIFY THAT THE JURISTS OF PARLIAMENT HAVE TAKEN THE DEFINITION #2

Self-portrait

Me Philippe BAUER can explain to the Police Commander Pascal LUTHI that he is not only Senator in Parliament, but that he is above all, one of the greatest Hot-shot lawyer of the Neuchâtel Bar, former President of the Bar. He is known and respected for protecting the interests of the powerful criminal organization to which members of the Chamber of Lawyers belong, including his prestigious colleagues such as Me Patrick Foetisch, Me Christian BETTEX.

Demonstration of his skills, with supporting exhibits
He can explain to him that the cantonal police commanders do not share all the values of Olivier Guéniat. For example, Jacques ANTENEN who is a former Cantonal judge from Vaud, shares Michael LAUBER’s Values as shown in an interview with the General Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter.

Read : 020616DE_JS

The Senator can give him to read the request for parliamentary investigation, filed by an elite of citizens, which describes practices that make shudder with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR, as' a PV of interview with an expert of the parliament, which confirms the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR,

Read : 051217DP_GC and 070116DP_FR

He can explain to Pascal Luthi that the Cantonal Judges of Neuchâtel, applying definition #1 of terrorism, had deemed illegitimate the prohibition made by the Bâtonnier to prohibit Me Burnet, unique witness to the slanderous denunciation described in the request for parliamentary inquiry, to testify.

See jugement NE

As the greatest Hot-shot lawyer of the Bar Association, he had to intervene before the Federal Court to quash this judgment by recalling that the Courts must not respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution, but the state order settled with the text of the law on the Chamber of lawyers.

.

He asked the Federal Court to make a judgment which said in substance that the lawyer must disobey the President of the BAR so that the fundamental rights of his client are not violated. The Federal Court confirmed that the Neuchâtel judges did not have the right to rule on the injunctions of the President of the BAR and that the lawyer must disobey the President of the Bar to protect the fundamental rights of his client by using Defintion #2 of Terrorism.

Definition of Terrorism #2 that serves to protect the interests of an criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament

In February 2021, Federal Councillor Alain BERSET asked for clarification on the damages resulting from the crimes committed with the injunctions of the Bar President and the violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

His question stemmed from the fact that the Parliamentary Secretary General, Philippe SCHWAB, was unable to carry out the mandate he received from the Federal Councillor Ueli MAURER within the deadline.

An extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, charged with dealing with these crimes, responded by return of the mail by giving evidence that a criminal organization was infiltrated into Parliament.

Read : 210525DE_AB

Senator BAUER could explain to Pascal LUTHI that he will have only to ask the TF to respect the definition of terrorism in the law on terrorism, to give even more power to this criminal organization that already puts the interests of the private association of the Bar Association ahead of respect for the fundamental rights of the people.

This criminal organization commits serious offences to create a climate of terror as evidenced by the public testimony and the deadly poisoning of Foetisch’s right-hand man according to a dissident lawyer

To be continued

Martine Rebetez, Professor Doctor of Climatology at the University of Neuchâtel, must have been surprised to discover the enormous skills of the General Prosecutor Fabien Gasser.

No one knew that he had a "diploma" in climatology from Michael LAUBER’s "prestigious school of the judiciary".

She may have the chance to take on the role of Prosecutor in Youth Trials!

Grand Expert
in Climatology
Fabien Gasser
offers an
unprecedented experience
to restore
the reputation
of
General Prosecutors

... lastly, a great scientist who wants objective and transparent information for the people ...

As Prosecutor Fabien Gasser knows that he cannot both present these figures and at the same time have the role of Prosecutor, it is likely that he will ask the Professor Doctor of Climatology, Martine REBETEZ, to assume exceptionally the role of Prosecutor in this trial and, to ask for the acquittal of our young activists.

To listen to, in the interview that follows, this fabulous commitment of this General Prosecutor to protect the rights of defence guaranteed by the Constitution and ensure a viable planet for future generations.

Interview with Fabien Gasser, on 4 May at the 7:30 pm TJ

He has learned from the chilling practices described in this request for a parliamentary inquiry that he knows at his fingertips

To read : 051217DP_GC

After having exceeded his powers according to the facts established by the extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, Fabien Gasser has just rebounded in a masterful way to restore his reputation

It is recalled that on February 16, 2021, the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, mandated to deal with the crimes committed with the injunctions of the President of the Bar, had specified that:

« Prosecutors have no jurisdiction to judge the obligation of a lawyer to override a client’s defence against any directions or injunctions of a <<President of the Bar»

… while he knew that he did not have the competence to judge these crimes, the General Prosecutor, Fabien Gasser, had judged them by flouting the rights of the victims' defense …

This time, he no longer violates the rights of the defence, by making available to young activists his skills as an expert in climatology and "recusing himself" in favour of a temporary prosecutor who is a World Leader in Science.

His spontaneous recusal is all the more important since there is a criminal complaint against a criminal organization that has been filed and the Fribourg Parliament must take a position.

See exhibits : 210519DE_SB & 210519DE_PA

"Long live respect for fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution"

Senator Philippe Bauer admits the mistakes of the legislator by hiding the solution proposed by the expert of the Parliament F. de Rougemont.

The Federal Prosecutor, Stefan KELLER, recused by the Federal Court in the Infantino case, dismissed the charges of lying, quote:

"Dans un communiqué, Stefan Keller dit prendre note de la décision. Il rejette toutefois les accusations formulées dans l'arrêt selon lesquelles il aurait "communiqué des informations trompeuses et incorrectes sur le plan factuel".

Source : RTS_INFO 5.05.21

COMMENTS BY SENATOR P. BAUER

The Senator P. Bauer, member of the Committee on Legal Affairs of the Parliament, well known for having forced the Federal Court to pronounce a judgment which states in substance that:

"a lawyer must disobey the President of the Bar so that the Federal Council can respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution"

criticized, as an initiate, the laws put in place by the legislator.

Me Philippe BAUER knew in detail the practices described in the request for parliamentary investigation

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

and the facts established by Me de Rougemont, which had convinced the Neuchâtel justice of the violation of fundamental rights with the injunctions of the Presidents of the Bar

See jugement NE

he had already shown that the legislator gave the members of the Chambers of Lawyers an advantage by having obtained that the Federal Court overturn this judgment with the argument that the lawyers had to disobey the Presidents of the Bar so that the fundamental rights of the litigants would not be violated.

He confirms again that the Federal Council cannot enforce fundamental rights, with its comments on the recusal of the Federal Prosecutor Stefan KELLER, which show that the legislator puts in place laws that cannot work !

To listen to his interview
TJ 19h30 du 5.5.2021

Me Philippe BAUER
Former President of the Bar
Highly Neuchâtel paid lawyer
Senator in Parliament
Representative of PLR Values in Parliamentt

Note that in his interview, Philippe Bauer omits to say that Stefan KELLER rejected the accusations made in the judgment of the Federal Judges

To listen the interview with Stefan Keller

TJ 19h30/ SK05.05.21

Senator Philippe BAUER knows that the lie by omission and the right of the accused: "to lie to defend himself" are two means made available to prosecutors and magistrates by the legislator (the Parliament) to prevent the Federal Council from enforcing fundamental rights.

Solution proposed by the expert of the Parliament of Vaud to enable the Federal Council to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitutionn

Reminder

Parliament’s expert, François de Rougemont, was appointed following the Zug massacre. He had the mandate to avoid another Zug massacre.

He explained that the laws put in place by Parliament allow lawmakers to commit crimes with impunity, preventing substantive issues from being addressed.

To avoid another Zug massacre, he undertook to answer all the substantive issues.

The lie by omission of judicial magistrates

Me de Rougemont had explained that it was a common practice of magistrates and prosecutors to set aside facts to benefit a party.

The legislator had not provided any means to control that the Prosecutors did not rule out facts.

On the contrary, the lack of independence of the Chamber of Lawyers from the Tribunals prevented any transparency on these practices, which make us shudder.

Moreover, the principle put in place by Parliament, that the accused has the right to lie in order to defend himself, benefited the members of criminal organizations to obtain the dismissal with benefit of the doubt.

The solution proposed by Parliament’s expert to put an end to these practices which make us shudder

Me de Rougemont had said that it would be sufficient for the legislator to require that all interviews and hearings made with judicial magistrates be recorded and even filmed so that prosecutors and judges can no longer use the lie by omission for giving benefits to a party.

This solution is mentioned by the public in an interview he had on January 12, 2007 with this expert from Parliament.

See exhibit 070116DP_FR

Advantage of this solution proposed by Parliament’s expert

In 2002, the General Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter in the presence of Jacques Antenen, member of the judges' supervisory authority, organized an interview of which there should be no trace to cover lies by omission of Judge Treccani. They would not have been able to do so if the legislator had implemented the solution proposed by Parliament’s expert.

See exhibit 020616DE_JS

Michael Lauber and Gianni Infantino would not have been able to hold secret talks without minute if this solution were implemented by the legislator.

Federal prosecutor Stefan KELLER, recused for alleged lies by federal judges, would have the recordings that allow him to show the people that he did not lie as he claims.

He could also show the people that Senator Philippe BAUER failed to speak of these alleged lies and that he knows the solution proposed by the Parliament’s expert to put an end to the discredit of the Prosecutors.

The lawyer who promised to shoot down a Federal Councillor, to force Parliament to put in place laws that allow the Federal Council to respect the Constitution, would no longer have any reason to do so.

See exhibit 210511DE_UM

The Valais Parliament would no longer have any reason to elect its General Prosecutor with a hearing forbidden to the public.

See Info_RTS_du 7.05.2021

Disadvantage of this solution
Members of criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament would be partially unmasked.

They could no longer receive the millions of salaries that the State pays to their members to set up and enforce despicable laws that prevent the members of the Federal Council from enforcing the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.

Advantages of the disadvantage

It should be noted that this disadvantage would make it possible to finance extensively the recordings required by this solution proposed by the Parliament’s expert.

Parliaments would no longer have to look for judges who are willing to lie by omission to violate the fundamental rights of litigants and give benefits to members of lawyers' brotherhoods.

Senator Bauer would have no more reason to criticize the despicable laws put in place by the legislator.

The Cantonal and Federal Police would no longer need to be deprived of independent Public Ministries whose Prosecutors do not have the competence to judge crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the Bar

See exhibit 210512DE_PA

In 2009, the current Senator, Me Philippe BAUER, obtained a judgment of the Federal Court which states in substance that a lawyer must disobey the President of the Bar so that the fundamental rights of his client are not violated.

The Federal Councillor, Alain BERSET, knows that the General Secretary of Parliament has been given the mandate to deal with a claim for compensation for the damage caused by the Confederation without rights.

He knows that it relates to these above words of Senator Philippe BAUER who revealed the existence of a hidden right to the people.

He knows that federal judges have given advantages to Philippe BAUER’s colleagues by confirming that a lawyer must disobey the President of the BAR so that prosecutors are not forced by the Bar Association to violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.

He noted that Philippe SCHWAB, General Secretary of Parliament, cannot respect human dignity with his mandate.

He asked the Federal Police for details on this blatantly crass violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution that allows to destroy the lives of citizens.

Alain BERSET
FEDERAL COUNCILLOR
Minister of Health

From experience, he knows that the law of silence does not allow to fight a covid-19 pandemic, nor does it allow to stop a criminal organization infiltrated Parliament

This extraordinary Federal Prosecutor replied by return of the mail, on February 16, 2021, to this request for transparency of Alain BERSET and the Federal Police.

This extraordinary Federal Prosecutor has given evidence that a criminal organization is infiltrated into Parliament

According to the powerful observation methodology of physicists, he revealed that the members of this criminal organization impose on the General Prosecutors the application of hidden rules to the people that allow their members to commit crimes with full impunity.

In this case, he made it apparent that the General Prosecutors did not have the jurisdiction to deal with crimes committed with the injunctions of the Bar President!

All Prosecutors and Members of the Bar Association knew this!

The existence of the criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament that had not revealed the expert of the Vaudois Parliament

In 2007, the expert of the Parliament of Vaud, Me François de ROUGEMONT, had explained to the members of the delegation of the public who filed the request for parliamentary investigation, quote :

« les particularités de la loi vaudoise qui permettent la criminalité économique par des hommes de loi en toute impunité. »

See exhibit: 070827DP_GC

On the other hand, Me de Rougemont never spoke of the hidden relations to the people that bind members of Parliament to the General Prosecutor. He did not say that these relationships allow them to force the general Prosecutor, with rules hidden from the people, to violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution.

He has never spoken, and let alone given the evidence, about the existence of members of a criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament that has put in place these hidden rules to the people, which force judges to give benefits to members of their organization.

The Federal Police was tasked to communicate to Alain BERSET, the response by return of the mail, of the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor.

See exhibit: 210505DE_IB

We can welcome Alain BERSET’s request for transparency. He, with his experience in managing Covid-19, knows that it is not possible to legislate an end to a pandemic.

He knows even more that the Federal Council has no right to destroy Lives with a criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament.

Now he knows that Members of Parliament, who hire General Prosecutors, are imposing hidden rules on them to cover up organized crime. These rules allow the Prosecutors to use backmail on CEO, death threats and even murder as shown by the alleged murder of the right-hand man of the Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA.

He knows that the Federal Council has an obligation to respect the lives of citizens and that it must put an end to the actions of the members of this organization infiltrated in Parliament.

Meanwhile, as with Covid-19, he knows that the Federal Council must take urgent measures to end the persecution of citizens with rules hidden from the people, put in place by members of this criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament.

He reveals the secret weapon that the superheroes of the criminal organization are equipped with. He showed how this weapon allows members of the criminal organization to violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

He gave a rational explanation to understand the reasons that led a dissenting lawyer to commit to shoot down a Federal Councillor to enforce Parliament to restore respect for fundamental rights.

Each must objectively observe these facts, including the handling of the secret weapon by the superheroes of the state, reported with the methodology of physicists.

Monsignor
Jacques ANTENEN
Commander of the Vaud Cantonal Police

One of the superheroes, engaged in a key position of the State, one of whose Dogmas is reported on March 17, 2021, below!

Unlike the head of the Vatican, Jacques Antenen never questioned the credibility of his Dogma.

It is recalled that after denying the observations made by Galileo in 1633, the Head of State of the Vatican rehabilitated him on October 31, 1992, 360 years later.

In 2021, everyone should be able to understand that the secret weapon that superheroes are equipped with, like Jacques ANTENEN, Jean Marc SCHWENTER, Eric COTTIER, Michael LAUBER, the federal judges,..., is used to violate the fundamental rights of the people

See exhibit: 210426DE_AA

By having publicly revealed the existence of this criminal organization, the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor agreed with the lawyer who committed to shoot down a Federal Councillor to put an end to the activities of the criminal organization.

Most importantly, he gave the Federal Council the means to identify the members of the criminal organization and to take public action to show that, contrary to the dissenting lawyer’s assertions, it is out of the question for the Federal Council to allow members of this criminal organization, infiltrated into the state, to violate the fundamental rights of citizens.

He gave the Federal Council, which has the same power as the head of the Vatican, the means to act to put an end to the deceptions of the people by the State, as did the head of the Vatican in confirming the accuracy of Galileo’s observations..

The secret weapon that equips magistrates in key positions

This weapon is a hidden rule for the people put in place by members of Parliament Criminal Organisation, which states :

“The MAGISTRATES have no jurisdiction to judge the obligation of a lawyer to have the defence of a client override any directives or injunctions of a President of the BAR.”

For example (theoretical case):

Prosecutors have no jurisdiction to enforce the fundamental rights of citizens, guaranteed by the Constitution, who are victims of a crime committed by the Chairman of the Board of Directors of a company in the following case :

The President of the Board of Directors is a member of the Bar Association and the President of the Bar Association has forbidden him to be the subject of a criminal complaint.

For example (practical case)

In 1995, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA committed the offences of unfair management, fraud and copyright infringement. He justifies his offences by stating that they will never be investigated because he is a member of the Chamber of Lawyers!

Read the request for a parliamentary inquiry to find out how the President of the Bar prevent prosecutors from investigating offences using rules hidden from the people set up by Parliament

See exhibit: 051217DP_GC

The interventions of the superheroes of the criminal organization

The criminal organization has placed superheroes at the key posts in the state, whose claims are not dared to be questioned.

For example :
Jaques Antenen said that, quote:

" If the judge Jean Treccani made disappear the unfair management offence from his Court order, it was because there were none"

See exhibit: 020616DE_JS

It is like the time of Galileo when the Monsignors of the State claimed that the Earth was still at the center of the Universe, despite the evidence that it was false.

Discover on this site the interventions of other superheroes, like Eric COTTIER, Bertrand Sauterel, with the rules hidden from the people put in place by the Parliament.

Read also, the criminal complaint: 210426DE_AA

This criminal complaint gives the Federal Council the means to show publicly that the dissenting lawyer wrongly believes that the Federal Authorities do not want to enforce fundamental rights.

Case to be followed !

On February 16, 2021, the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, mandated to deal with crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar, revealed that Prosecutors do not have the jurisdiction to judge crimes committed by members of the Bar, when a lawyer refuses to disobey to the President of the BAR.

The expert from the Vaudois Parliament, who had dealt with the same issue in 2006, revealed that he regretted that the orphans of the Zug massacre did not know why their parents were killeds.

He gave the magic formula that the elected representatives should have applied to prevent the killing and respect the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

This formula is obviously circumvented with the collective amnesia disease suffered by some of our Prosecutors and with the new procedures applied by Prosecutor Eric Cottier

Philippe SCHWAB
General Secretary of the Swiss Parliament

He obviously does not know the magic formula given by the expert of the Parliament of Vaud

When we consult the Internet or wikipedia, we do not find traces of the mandate given by the Parliament of Vaud to Me François de ROUGEMONT.

Yet this expert, an experienced lawyer, did indeed exist, as shown by one of the minutes of the meeting of the public delegation with him.

See exhibit: 070116DP_FR

After the Zug massacre, this expert received the litigants by saying: that he had been mandated by the Vaudois Parliament to avoid another massacre.

¨

He is the expert who was tasked with processing the request for a parliamentary inquiry

See exhibit: 051217DP_GC

To avoid further killing:

« He said that he was committed to answering all the substantive questions, without using the doublespeak »

It was the magic formula that would have prevented the killing of Zug and that would have prevented another killing.

Me De ROUGEMONT said that he had one regret, it was that the orphans of the killing of Zug did not know why their parents had been killed.

To the public’s question:

“How is it possible that the President of the Bar BETTEX was able to prohibit the witness of the false denunciation from testifying,” he replied:

"The Courts were not independent of the Chamber of Lawyers" »

He had confirmed that the President of ICSA, Me Foetisch, who was a member of the Bar Association, used this lack of independence hidden from the people to commit his crimes.

In 2016, a dissident lawyer will confirm these facts by talking about Initiates who all know it.

He will claim that Friedrich LEIBACHER, better known as the Zug killer, was an Initiate. He sacrificed His Life so that elected officials would put an end to these procedures that prevent dealing with substantive issues and which the magistrates use to violate the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

From now on, no one can ignore the magic formula revealed by the Parliament’s expert to prevent another Zug massacre. In particular, it is important that Philippe Schwab knows this magic formula that was put in place by those who know what really happened on September 27, 2001 in Zug:

It is the secret of 27 September 2001 of the Initiates revealed by the lawyer of the Parliament

See exhibit: 210421DE_PS

It is reminded that Albert Einstein said:

"Those who have the privilege of knowing has a duty to act!"

An extraordinary Federal Prosecutor reveals for the first time that the power of the members of the “BAR ASSOCIATION” is above the power of the Federal Judges and General Prosecutors.

It must be observed that all lawyers, members of the Bar Association, knew it!

Of the alert given by a senior lawyer

A dissident lawyer had already sounded the alarm in 2016, saying that the federal authorities are infiltrated by members of a criminal organization that controls power and deceives the people.......

From the dissenting lawyer’s message

He was saying that:

« Those who knew it dared not say it »

... this lawyer called them "The Initiates".  They were all bound by the initiates rule : 

«WE DON’T DARE TALK ABOUT IT»

According to him, among these INITIATES, there were members of a criminal organization, and elected representatives who dared not speak out by fear of economic and political reprisals.

The duty of the President of the Federal Assembly

The President of the Federal Assembly has the privilege to have been informed about the situation.

He knows that a federal prosecutor broke the law of silence.

He now has a duty to act.

Andreas AEBI
Swiss Parliament President

Successor of Isabelle MORET who sent him the file on the crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the Bar Association

By breaking a taboo on the existence of a criminal organization, he has just applied the message of young people who say :
« Silence on the violation of constitutional rights is no longer an option ».

Specialist in financial crime, this extraordinary Federal Prosecutor has dared to break the silence on the hidden relation to the people that bind the Chamber of Lawyers to the magistrates of the judicial system.

The rule hidden from the people by the Bar Association

This Prosecutor dared to speak about the rule hidden from the people, which allowed Foetisch to commit crimes with impunity by having the insurance that his crimes would never be investigated.

This rule is as follows:

« No magistrate has any jurisdiction to judge the obligation of a lawyer to have the defence of a client override any directives or injunctions of a President of the Bar Association »

From the pyramid of Ponzi made with the hidden rule

The Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor pointed out that if a member of the Bar Association uses this rule that:

"the magistrates have no jurisdiction to judge the obligation of a lawyer to have the defence of a client override any directives or injunctions of the President of the Bar Association",

then he can commit crimes with full impunity.

=> It is a chain of PONZI, worthy of the one used by Bernard MADOFF, to defraud the citizens. Here it allows members of the Bar Assocition to swindle citizens with state power

Everyone can observe that:

« It is enough for the member of the Bar Association, like Foetisch, to obtain an injunction from the President of the Bar that prevents the investigation of his crimes so that: the Federal Judges and all lower courts, who have not juridiction to judge his crimes and who do not recuse themselves spontaneously, are forced to make permanent denials of justice to cover his crimes»

FROM THE FOETISCH GANG THAT PRACTICES THE RULE OF THE INITIATES: "WE DO NOT DARE SPEAK OF IT"

Patrick Foetisch uses this pyramid of Ponzi to commit his crimes. He is as great as Bernard Madoff who died this Wednesday.

The Journalist Romain GUBERT, who wrote the book entitled:

"And above all, do not tell anyone, ….. in the heart of the Madoff gang" (ref.: Romain Gubert)

shows how Madoff could use the institutions to commit the biggest scam in history with a Ponzi chain. He could have written the same book on the crimes committed by Patrick Foetisch, with the title:

"And above all, don’t tell anyone, ….. at the heart of the Foetisch gang"

The end of the rule: "you don’t dare talk about it"

By revealing this hidden rule to the people that Foetisch uses to commit his crimes, this Federal Prosecutor has especially shown the existence of this gang or criminal organization infiltrated in the highest authorities of the Country. It made it possible to understand the behaviour of these initiated magistrates, who invent diseases and procedures, which do not exist, so as not to disobey the injunctions of the Presidents of the Bar Association.

The most screwed up, among them, make secret sessions, without Minutes, which we dare not talk about, as Jean-Marc SCHWENTER, Jacques Antenen,...... , Michael LAUBER,... as shown in the following document:

exhibit: 020616DE_JS

with the terrible disease of collective amnesia, which Michael LAUBER suffers, which show the existence of this Foetisch Gang with its brilliant operating procedures hidden from the people.

Action to stop crimes committed with the PONZI chain

To end a chain of PONZI, we must cut the head of the Pyramid as it was done for Bernard Madoff.

The Federal Prosecutor has for the first time given an explanation why a dissenting lawyer proposed to shoot down a Federal Councillor to put an end to this form of criminality :

To observe that the Federal Council is at the top of the pyramid. If the federal Council spontaneously terminates the activities of the criminal organization, or if it is neutralized by the dissenting lawyer, the PONZI chain can no longer function and the lower links of the PONZI chain are automatically neutralized.

The alternative is to set up neutral and independent courts with the competence to judge crimes committed with this pyramid.

It is the role of the President of the Federal Assembly, who has the privilege of knowing and the duty to act !

See exhibit : 210414DE_AA

The INITIATES rule that says:

"WE DON’T DARE TALK ABOUT IT"

…… is no longer applicable, since an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor took a written position on the crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR.

See exhibit: 210407DE_PS

Philippe Schwab
General Secretary of the Swiss Parliament

He’s one of the Initiates.

He knows that an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor has for the first time confirmed in writing that Prosecutors do not have the jurisdiction to judge crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR

He knows that Einstein said:

« Those who have the privilege of knowing have the duty to act »

In this case, he no longer has to fear breaking the silence and enforcing the Values of the Constitution, since a Federal Prosecutor has already broken the law of Silence.

Before February 16th, 2021

Swiss media never reported on Foetisch’s crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR.

Me Foetisch was Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA, when he committed his crimes. He justified them by saying that he was protected by his membership in the Chamber of Advocates.

Exhibit: 051217DP_GC

The law of silence broken in writing on February 16th, by an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor

For the first time, on February 16th, 2021, an experienced lawyer, mandated as an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor to deal with crimes committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR, explained that the Prosecutors do not have the jurisdiction to judge these crimes, quote :

«His mandate does not confer on him any jurisdiction to judge the obligation of a lawyer to have the defence of a client override any directives or injunctions of a President of the BAR»

Observation #1

We find here the description of a method of the P2 lodge, of which his venerable Master, Licio GELLI, made several times the front page of the Swiss media.

He had even been housed in a prestigious Geneva building at Champ-Dollon. His sneaky departure by the big door to take his helicopter had made the headlines of the press, see tdg 16.12.2015

Observation #2

The Swiss Press never spoke about Foetisch’s methods to control the judges and the media, while it spoke at length about it for Licio GELLI who could have been his disciple.

Observation #3

With the written position of this extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, Philippe Schwab, and the INITIATES, know that it is officially made public that the Prosecutors do not have the competence to judge the crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR.

With the written revelations of this Federal Prosecutor, all parliamentarians know that there is a Firewall exercised by the Chamber of Advocates on the information transmitted to Parliament. This firewall allows members of the Chamber of Advocates to prevent elected members of parliament from enforcing the fundamental rights of the people.

Observation #4

This extraordinary Federal Prosecutor revealed that Switzerland has a State in the State, the CHAMBER OF ADVOCATES, which controls the power of judges with secret rules, as Lodge P2 was considered a state in the state that controlled power with rules hidden from the people.

Two scientists, physicist and biophysicist, Nobel Prize winner, give a lesson in ethics and respect for the Values of the Constitution to the Swiss authorities…

They explain to the people the difference for a scientist that there is between:

« civil duty of transparency »

It took two NOBELS PRIZE, Albert EINSTEIN and Jacques DUBOCHET - who have the privilege of knowing - to show that they have a duty to act and that they act, for an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, an initiate, decides to act in turn by showing that elected members of Parliament are putting in place laws to decree that facts do not exist.

An extraordinary Federal Prosecutor - who has the privilege of knowing - acted on February 16th, 2021, revealing a practice of the political world that makes us shudder

This extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, appointed to deal with crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR, had at his disposal the data published on this site. In particular:

1) He knew that Senator Philippe BAUER said that a lawyer must disobey the President of the BAR so that the fundamental rights of his client are not violated by the injunction of the President of the BAR, who forced this lawyer, witness of crime committed by other lawyers, to remain silent

2) He was aware of the terrible illness that struck Michael LAUBER: "the collective amnesia". He knew that the Prosecutors, suffering from this terrible disease, make sessions without minutes that they do not remember and that allow to deny the existence of facts showing corruption and organized crime, ....

This extraordinary Federal Prosecutor then revealed on February 16th, 2021, that the Parliament has put in place a law to investigate the crime committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR, which has as consequence that, quote:

« His mandate does not confer on him any jurisdiction to judge the obligation of a lawyer to have the defence of a client override any directives or injunctions of a President of the BAR »

Censorship of scientists by parliamentarians is no longer taboo since March 9th

On March 9th, the Swiss Press reported that parliamentarians wanted to censor information given by Covid-19 taskforce scientists to the people, on the grounds that: a law allowed to end the pandemic by having decreed that it was over.

A few elected members or Parliaments remembered that if the scientist, that was Galileo, observed that the Earth rotates, it was not enough for a parliamentarian to decree in a law that it does not rotate for this to be true. They said, quote :

« we cannot legislate an end to an epidemic, we must fight it »

See exhibit : 210309-MSN

Covid-19 pandemic is just the tip of the iceberg

Today parliamentarians know that they can no longer be credible by putting in place laws that declare that facts do not exist, while every citizen can verify by himself the existence of facts.

As Albert Einstein said and Jacques Dubochet demonstrated, parliamentarians know that:

« Those who have the privilege of knowing have a duty to act »

.... This is the first time that an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor has explained that the Presidents of the BAR has a role of Firewall that allows the Federal Authorities to violate their civil duty of transparency by denying the existence of facts or by distorting them.

After Michael LAUBER revealed the terrible disease he was suffering from, collective amnesia, the scientists have data that show that Vaudois personalities such as Jean-Marc SCHWENTER, Jacques ANTENEN, already suffered from this disease in 2002:

See exhibit: 020616DE_JS

The origin of this disease was observed in 2005 by reliable witnesses. It is due to the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR.

See exhibit: 051217DP_GC

210309-MSN

020616DE_JS

The  Ten  Commandments

Everyone knows the 10 commandments given by God to men, the third of which says:

« YOU SHALL NOT USE THE NAME OF THE ETERNAL YOUR GOD TO DECEIVE »

Of the Almighty God of the Constitution

The Federal Constitution begins its preamble by referring to Almighty God and His Values for Creation. Quote :

In the name of Almighty God!
The Swiss People and the Cantons,
mindful of their responsibility towards creation,
resolved to renew their alliance so as to strengthen liberty, democracy, independence and peace in a spirit of solidarity and openness towards the world,
determined to live together with mutual consideration and respect for their diversity...

Of the 11th Commandment

The Constitution does not speak of the 11th COMMANDMENT, which is the command to pay.

The latter was not given by God to men, but it was given by members of a Masonic lodge infiltrated into the state.

This 11th commandment is currently used by the State, in the name of the Church, or in the name of Almighty God, to force citizens to fund members of a criminal organization. In particular, the state used it against a physicist.

The Synod was alerted by this physicist, a scientist like Galileo, of the risks associated with this 11th Commandment.

This physicist chose to resign from the church to observe in complete independence the effects of this  11th commandment which makes the happiness of the members of a Masonic lodge.

Observation :

This 11th command is used to violate the first 10 commandments by members of a criminal organization!

The SYNOD is alerted

The SYNOD must control how the State respects the 10 commandments, or the human rights guaranteed by the ECHR which are based on the same Values.

Evelyne BORER
President of Synod

A heavy responsibility for the name of God not to be used to deceive the people by members of a Masonic lodge infiltrated into the state.

See exhibit 210317DE_EB

Gross violation of the Value of the Constitution

These crimes are committed by members of brotherhoods of lawyers and persons, in charge of a task of the State, who lie, who steal, who make false testimonies against their neighbour, who kill (see the conditions of the death of Foetisch’s right-hand man on this site) and who use the name of the GOD of the Constitution to deceive the people,

In short: they violate the 10 commandments of Almighty God which are recalled here :

Reminder of the Ten Commandments

1 -You shall have no other gods before Me
2 - You shall not make idols
3 - You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain
4 - Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy
5- Honor your father and your mother
6 -You shall not murder.
7- You shall not commit adultery.
8- You shall not steal.
9- You shall not bear false witness against your neighbour.
10 -You shall not covet.

Questions from the Shaman
Concerning these crimes committed, for example by Me Foetisch, with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR, a Shaman had said in 2001 that it was necessary to ask the highest leaders of the country five questions, one of which was the following :

« Do you believe that the forces of evil exist »

Comment #1 :
For the members of the Masonic lodges, who do not believe in God, we observe that the question of the Shaman has no meaning.
Their Oath to respect the Constitution has no value for them. What matters to them is not to disobey their Master, for example the President of the Bar for lawyers..

It is noted that this is the full scope of the above fact established by the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor.

Comment #2 :
The power of the Shamans is not explainable by scientists. They can only apply the recommendations of the Shamans and observe the effects announced by the Shamans:

(1) This question of the Shaman on the existence of the forces of evil, relating to the crimes committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR, was asked according to her recommendation to the President of the Confederation, Simonetta Sommaruga.

(2) First unpredictable effect: Mr. Vincent Goumaz - who was aware of the situation - then made a Securities fraud to hide this case of crimes committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR

(3) Criminal complaint was filed against Mr. Vincent Goumaz, but second unpredictable effect before the Federal Prosecutor explained that the Prosecutors were not competent to investigate the crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR, the Prosecutors refused to investigate the criminal complaint for forgery in Securities, hiding their incompetence.

(4) Third unpredictable effect: Vincent GOUMAZ applied the 11th Commandment. He put a commandment to pay in the name of the Church against the physicist, specifying that the fraud in Securities served to finance the Church. He did not know that the Shaman is of Christian culture => she had specified that her questions were addressed to the senior leaders that the Physicist would be brought to meet. By Applying 11th Commandment, Vincent Goumaz showed that the Church was not independent of the Order of Lawyers and that the questions of the Shaman were addressed to the SYNOD which would have made agreements with the State that allow the State to use the name of GOD to deceive the people and persecute the faithful..

5) Fourth unpredictable effect: the physicist refused to allow the Church to finance the members of a criminal organization with public funds. He asked Vincent GOUMAZ to inform the synod and he resigned from the church to escape this persecution

(6) Fifth unpredictable effect: Mr. Vincent Goumaz refused in the name of the Church that the Physicist resigned, he wanted the Church to make him a certificate attesting that he had resigned... =>the questions of the Shaman took meaning, when she said that her questions should be asked to expose leaders who violate the values of Life and serve to bring about change

Observation of the Physicist :
The Shaman had said to ask her questions to the senior leaders of the country.

This "Way of the Cross", with the position of Vincent Goumaz, shows that the questions of the Shaman are addressed particularly to the members of the SYNOD, who would not know these agreements made with the members of a Masonic lodge, to persecute the faithful.

As Vincent Goumaz wants a response from the Church, it is these members of the SYNOD - who must ensure that the Church is not infiltrated by members of a Masonic lodge to persecute the Swiss people -  who will have to specify :

What the Synod will do to end the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar, as long as the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor has confirmed that he does not have the competence to judge the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR and that despite this fact, the State replaces the God of Christians to persecute them with members of a criminal organization

See exhibit 020616DE_JS,
read top of page 3 of 4

This maxim was considered as a dogma by all the deputies of the Vaudois Parliament until 2020.

The Maxim was not said by the High Priest of the Temple of Solomon, but by a magistrate, equally starry. It was His Highness the magistrate Jacques ANTENEN, presumed High Priest of the temple of a Masonic lodge in Vaud State.

This dogma was questioned with the secret auditions without Minutes of Michael LAUBER.

Since the terrible disease of collective amnesia was discovered, Christian deputies of the Vaud Parliament are invited to take a position on this dogma

Monsignor
Jacques ANTENEN
Commander of the Vaud State Police
Author of the DOGMA (JT)

He will have to undergo the test of the super propagators of the collective amnesia virus, following the enormous damage that this disease has already caused in his entourage.

They know that the Cantonal Court has neither the competence to set up an independent Court, nor the competence to rule on the crime committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR,…. since 16 February 2021.

In 2007, the expert of the Vaudois Parliament, Me De Rougemont, explained that Me Foetisch could not have committed his crimes if the Vaudois Parliament had set up an independent courts to judge the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR.

Senator Philippe BAUER agreed with this expert by saying that lawyers must disobey the President of the BAR so that the rights of their clients are not violated. In practice the lawyers do not dare to disobey their President, as the police officers do not dare disobey their Commander (even if he is very ill, as it is the case here).

The deputies of the Vaudois Parliament were asked to set up independent courts to judge the crimes committed with the injunctions of the Presidents of the BAR.

On February 16, 2021, the Extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, appointed to deal with crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR, confirmed officially the remarks of Me De Rougemont, by saying that::

 "HIS MANDATE DOES NOT CONFER ON HIM ANY JURISDICTION TO JUDGE THE OBLIGATION OF A LAWYER TO HAVE THE DEFENCE OF A CLIENT TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ANY DIRECTIONS OR INJUNCTIONS OF A PRESIDENT OF THE BAR "

Jacques Antenen already knew this on June 12, 2002, during the interview with the Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter on the crimes committed by Me Foetisch, whose minutes were kept secret.

But no Christian in Parliament could have imagined that at that time Jean-Marc SCHWENTER and Jacques ANTENEN were already struck by the terrible disease of collective amnesia.

No one could have suspected that this virus has infiltrated the state, with the Order of Lawyers as site of infection, and then has formed a cluster with the members of a Vaud Masonic lodge who hold interviews without minutes or secret minutes..

As the Swiss Parliament’s plenum established, you can’t end a pandemic with a law or a dogma. You have to fight it.

Members of Parliament, who call themselves Christians, are invited to fight this pandemic, now that we know that Jacques ANTENEN was very ill when he said :

"If the judge Jean Treccani made disappear the unfair management offence from his Court order, it was because there were none."

For more details, see exhibit 210315DE_GC, with its appendices.

...This is all the more so since an expertise of Professor Franz Riklin has shown that dogma does not resist the examination of Professionals of the Law.

020616DE_JS

210315DE_GC

TO END THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE NATIONAL COUNCIL PLENUM REFUSES TO MUZZLE SCIENTISTS AND USE THE ORDER-IN-COUNCIL METHOD OF SENATOR PHILIPPE BAUER WHICH IS THE PRIMARY VECTOR FOR THE SPREAD OF THE COLLECTIVE AMNESIA VIRUS.

ORDER-IN-COUNCIL METHODIt is reminded that Senator Philippe BAUER obtained a judgment of the Federal Court which decrees in substance that lawyers must disobey the President of the BAR, so that their clients, victims of crimes committed with the interventions of the President of the BAR, do not suffer millions of damages and crass violation of their rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.

THE COLLECTIVE AMNESIA VIRUS

We recall that our highest prosecutors and judicial magistrates are overwhelmed by the pandemic of a terrible disease :

It is collective amnesia

This illness, as dangerous as Covid-19, causes the magistrates to forget having held secret sessions without minutes.

A prosecutor even started to become delirious by applying laws that do not exist!

"None of them remembers that they are paid by public funds to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution".

They have become, in spite of themselves, dangers for the Swiss people.

DAMAGE CREATED BY COVID-19 THAT WORKS LIKE THE DAMAGE CREATED BY THE INTERVENTION OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE BAR OR THE COLLECTIVE AMNESIA VIRUS

It took Covid-19 to show that it caused as much damage as the one created by the interventions of the President of the BAR, for Parliament’s plenum to find that:

« we cannot legislate an end to an epidemic, we must fight it »

See exhibit 210309-MSN

Senator
Philippe BAUER
Neuchâtel State
Big-shot lawyer

This brilliant former President of the BAR had obtained a judgment from the Federal Court which decrees in substance that :

"lawyers must disobey the President of the BAR so that their clients do not suffer millions of damages due to the relations that bind the Bar Association to the Courts,...

...this decree does not allow to respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution, because the lawyers do not dare to disobey their President and their disobedience would not put an end to the collective amnesia of the judicial magistrates

In contrast, this decree has been very effective in making citizens insecure and provoking the curiosity of Federal Councillor Alain BERSET, who has the experience of his fight against covid-19.

See exhibit: 210211DE_IB

« HIS MANDATE DOES NOT CONFER ON HIM ANY JURISDICTION TO JUDGE THE OBLIGATION OF A LAWYER TO HAVE THE DEFENCE OF A CLIENT TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER ANY DIRECTIONS OR INJUNCTIONS OF A BAR PRESIDENT "

IT IS NOTED THAT THIS FEDERAL PROSECUTOR WAS NOT INFECTED WITH THE COLLECTIVE AMNESIA VIRUS. HE AGREES WITH THE PLENUM OF THE NATIONAL COUNCIL, WHICH HAS UNDERSTOOD THAT AN EPIDEMIC CANNOT BE ENDED WITH A LAW, BUT THAT IT MUST BE FOUGHT!.

SCIENTISTS COMMENT ON THE EFFECTS OF THE COLLECTIVE AMNESIA VIRUS

A) Facts known to magistrates not infected with the collective amnesia virus

A1) Courts' Lack of Jurisdiction to Judge Crime Committed by Injunctions of the Bar Presidents

All federal prosecutors and judges knew that they did not have the jurisdiction to override a client’s defence against the injunctions of a Bar President. This was noted in the public request for a parliamentary inquiry, which states, quote:

"The Bar Association reduces the power of the Judge"

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

Everyone knew that this observation was confirmed in 2007 by the Expert of Parliament, who explained that the Courts were not independent of the Bar Association and that the codes of procedure were not applicable, as described in these Minutes of a Public Interview with the Parliamentary Expert:

See exhibit 070116DP_FR

A2) The millions of damages caused by the interventions of the Bar Presidents and the alleged poisoning of Foetisch’s right arm

All the Federal Prosecutors and Judges knew that the magistrate Eric COTTIER, before he was struck down by the virus of collective amnesia, had established that the Value of the damage caused with the interventions of the Bar Presidents was several millions.
The sudden death of Mr. Penel, Foetisch’s right-hand man, was never correlated with the secret interview of 12 June 2002, with Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter and Jacques Antenen, whose minutes were kept secret.
It is noted that the Prosecutor Eric COTTIER, successor of this prestigious Prosecutor, who was Jean-Marc Schwenter, had access to the file which contained the minutes of the interview of June 12, 2002, kept secret. We underlines that a lawyer mentioned in the minutes, forced to wait outside, can attest the existence of this secret interview

See exhibit : 020616DE_JS

B) Delusions of magistrates infected with the collective amnesia virus

B1) Secret interview with General Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter, on 12 June 2002, the Minutes of which were kept secret

It was only in 2019 that Members of Parliament discovered that our prestigious Federal Prosecutor, Michael LAUBER, was conducting secret sessions without Minutes, which he did not remember. It was not until 2020 that it was determined that the Federal Prosecutor was seriously ill, contaminated and devastated by the collective amnesia virus..

It is only since 2021, that we dare to talk about this terrible disease, which had visibly reached already in 2002, the Prosecutor Jean-Marc Schwenter, as shown by the Minutes of a secret interview, of which the Prosecutor COTTIER had access to the file.

See exhibit: 020616DE_JS

B2) Serious delusions caused by the collective amnesia virus in particular for the General Prosecutor COTTIER.

Overwhelmed by this disease, in good faith, the General Prosecutor Cottier believed that the Vaudois Parliament has put in place a law that decrees that : "when a defendant has not received a Court Order sent by mail A, it was sufficient for him to say that the post office had not returned the A mail document  to him, so that he brought formal proof that the defendant had received this Court Order".

Even though a CAP lawyer explained that this procedure does not work and that it does not exist, Prosecutor Cottier did not realize that he was delirious. He didn’t realize in his delusion that he may never have written that Court Order.
It was an unknown effect of the collective amnesia virus that made him forget that he was paid with taxpayers' money to uphold the fundamental rights of citizens, instead of having to give benefits to criminals.

This terrible collective amnesia virus was acting like Covid-19 that changes the taste of cooks and no longer allows them to appreciate the Values required by those who are not sick.

C) Formal conclusion of the scientists

Our people is in danger if the prosecutors, struck down by the terrible virus of collective amnesia, begin to give benefits to criminals with secret interviews without Minutes, of which they forget the existence.

The delusions of Prosecutor Cottier show that it is not enough to obtain a judgment of the Federal Court, which says in substance that the lawyer must disobey the Bar President, so that the victims of crimes, committed with the interventions of the Bar President, do not suffer damage, like Senator PLR, Philippe BAUER, decreed it.

Parliament must take seriously the damage caused by the collective amnesia virus, the acute form of which cannot be eradicated, by putting in place a law that decrees the end of the epidemic.

No one can ignore that this terrible virus, responsible for the delusions of Prosecutor Cottier and the secret keeping of the Minutes of this interview of June 12, 2002, may have caused the death of Mr. Penel, by those who launched this Virus. It would be murder, as a dissident lawyer claims.

=> It was time for the National Council Plenum to refuse to muzzle scientists by stressing that :

« We cannot legislate an end to an epidemic, we must fight it »

The President of the Federal Assembly was informed of the situation: Read more:

210310DE_AA

210310DE_AA

020616DE_JS

210309-MSN

051217DP_GC

The days of Bradley Birkenfeld and Marcel OSPEL are over.

The prestigious school of Michael LAUBER being affected with the terrible disease of Michael LAUBER, which is collective amnesia, the consequences are the following:

The CEO of UBS inherits the procedures that have made the glory of the Swiss justice but that have become toxic like those described by Bradley Birkenfeld!

Ralph HAMERS
UBS CEO

He cannot ignore the fact that the Swiss Confederation no longer has an Attorney General as a result of this terrible illness that struck Michael LAUBER..

He cannot ignore the fact that Senator P. Bauer did not foresee that UBS clients could suffer damage if their lawyer refuses to disobey the President’s Bar!

For the younger generation, who has never had the privilege of having an interview with the General Prosecutor, Jean-Marc SCHWENTER, and who has never been informed by Eric COTTIER, his successor, about the proceedings of these interviews, where Jean-Marc Prosecutor received the litigants with red carpet welcome, .... , we ask you to read the minutes of one of those great Moments of anthology that made the glory of the Vaudois Parliament.

It was the great time, when lawyers had to stay outside in front of the office of the General Prosecutor who was only concerned with the well-being of the members of the Brotherhood of Patrick Foetisch by kindly receiving the litigants :

To read and relive here one of these unforgettable moments of anthology :

Exhibit : 020616DE_JM

It is over.

The General Prosecutor Eric COTTIER tried to innovate with his clever procedure so that a litigant does not receive his Court Orders.

It is recalled that Eric COTTIER states that if he sends an order by mail A, and the Post office does not return the mail A, then he has the formal proof that the defendant received it.

But a lawyer from the CAP explained that this procedure did not work. The Prosecutor Eric COTTIER had forgotten to say that if he did not post the Court Order then the post office could not return it to him, moreover the postmen do not have the duty to return a mail A which the recipient did not receive....

This is a toxic procedure for a CEO of a bank who has to empty a client’s account to finance organized crime with a method that is not legal according to a CAP lawyer.

This is all the more toxic, since the extraordinary Federal Prosecutor, appointed to deal with crime committed with the interventions of the Bar Officers, said:

« Its mandate does not confer to him any jurisdiction to judge the obligation of a lawyer to have the defence of a client override any directives or injunctions of a President of the BAR »

.....The Prosecutor Eric COTTIER knew like this Federal Prosecutor that he did not have this competence....He knew that he had no right to write Court Orders, even if his clever procedure made that the defendant did not receive them and would never have knowledge of them. It is observed that Jean-Marc Schwenter never made such an act of forfeiture. On contrary, he received the litigants with a big ceremony worthy of an Alcapone!

To discover the Challenge of Ralph HAMERS so that UBS is not complicit in organized crime and such acts of forfeiture, by applying obsolete and toxic procedures:

Exhibit : 210304DE_RH

See TJ 19h30, 23.02.21

The Tenor of the Neuchâtelois Bar, Senator Philippe BAUER, is aware that candidates for elections may receive hidden benefits, other than funding, that distort the elections. He wants all these benefits to be visible with the new Transparency Act

See Tj 19h30, 23.02.21

Senator P. BAUER
Tenor of the
Neuchâelois BAR

The Senator Philippe BAUER is aware that to win an election, an injunction of the President of the BAR, against which a Prosecutor can do nothing, is a hidden advantage to the people that can be disloyal or even criminal.

The well-known example given by this Senator

In 2009, this Tenor of the Neuchâtel Bar had obtained a judgment from the TF which said in substance that the lawyer must disobey the President of the BAR to preserve the fundamental rights of his client guaranteed by the Constitution in the context of a crime, where members of the BAR associations are stakeholders.

This Tenor of the Neuchâtel Bar had not specified that, if the lawyer did not dare to disobey the President of the BAR for fear of reprisals, his client could be robbed by his fellow lawyers before Courts whose power was reduced.

He omitted to say that federal prosecutors, such as Michael LAUBER or Jacques RAYROUD, did not have the jurisdiction to have the defence of the lawyer’s client override any instructions or injunctions given by the President of the BAR to the lawyer's client.

It was an advantage, which the members of his brotherhood enjoyed, that allowed them, for example, to eliminate competing candidates in elections with hidden advantages.

Observation

The text of the Transparency Act - which mentions all the benefits offered to members of the Order of Lawyers - has not yet been published.

To be continued

The press criticized Alain Berset for not listening to Covid-19 experts

He reacts well by worrying about the censorship exercised on the expert of the Vaudois Parliament

Alain BERSET
Federal Councillor

He is concerned about state censorship of an expert appointed to prevent a new killing of Zug

According to the press, the second wave of Covid-19 could have been less deadly if the experts had been listened to by Alain Berset

See article 20 minutes

For another issue concerning respect for Life:

Alain BERSET knows that Senator Philippe BAUER has said that lawyers must disobey the President of the Bar in order to ensure that the fundamental rights of their clients, guaranteed by the Constitution, are not violated, see comments below dated 06.01.21

Alain Berset understood the lesson given by the Press. He is the first Federal Councillor to worry about the censorship exercised on the expert of the Vaudois Parliament, Me de Rougemont, who warned the authorities that the crimes committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the bar could provoke a new killing of Zug.

He has delegated his collaborators to clarify this case of expert censored by the State.

Since an extraordinary Federal Prosecutor has already been appointed to deal with the issue of crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the bar, nothing has yet filtered.

We can only salute the courage of Alain BERSET who want to break the LAW OF SILENCE on this censorship exercised on an expert.

See exhibit 210211DE_IB

051217DP_GC

210211DE_IB

AN OFFICIAL REQUIRES THE CHURCH TO GET INVOLVED TO SIGN A DEPARTURE CERTIFICATE

Vincent GOUMAZ, tax officer, skillfully appeals to the church to judge the economic crime committed with the Interventions of the Presidents of the bar

The remarkable Confederate
Dissident lawyer
Whistleblower

'

Prosecutors Michael LAUBER and Jacques RAYROUD will have to disclose to the ecclesiastical authorities the result of their investigation on the dissident lawyer, see below the comments dated 26.06.19

HE MADE A SECURITY FRAUD TO FORCE THE CHURCH TO INTERVENE IN THIS CASE OF CRIME COMMITTED BY MEMBERS OF A MASONIC LODGE

Monsieur Vincent Goumaz, facing a challenge worthy of Ninja Warrior, had a brilliant idea to fight fairly Jacques RAYROUD, one of the best students trained by the prestigious school of Michael LAUBER.

Forced to establish a security fraud to charge ecclesiastical taxes with procedures that cannot take into account the crimes committed with the interventions of Presidents of the BAR, Vincent Goumaz sued for debt Dr.Erni, who did not want to pay for Securities Fraud which is used to finance organized crime by a masonic lodge, of which Jacques RAYROUD and the Prosecutor Eric COTTIER are accomplices.

Unsurprisingly, Dr. Erni has :

1) on the one hand opposes the prosecution with the following motivation  :

Security Fraud, crime case committed with the interventions of the President of the Bar and procedural codes which are not applicable. To verify that the State has informed the synod !

2) On the other hand he announced that he was leaving the church immediately considering that the role of the church is not to cover up crimes committed by a masonic lodge.

Skillfully, Mr. Vincent GOUMAZ pointed out that it is impossible to leave the church without an attestation signed by its leaders.

See exhibit 210202VG_DE

Consequence : The Church will be obliged to judge the Security Fraud which serves to finance the members of a masonic lodge and the manner in which the Prosecutor Jacques RAYROUD, from the famous school of Michael LAUBER, respects human rights and the values of the New Testament of Fribourg

See exhibit 210210DE_VG

THE PEOPLE CANNOT VOTE ON PARLIAMENT’S COUNTER-PROJECT FOR THE INITIATIVE WITH A BAN ON COVERING HIS FACE IN PUBLIC

IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE NOT TO HAVE THE RIGHT TO ACCEPT OR REJECT THE COUNTER-PROJECT OF THE PARLIAMENT

ALAIN BERSET DESCRIBED IN A SPEECH THIS COUNTER-PROJECT WHICH DOES NOT ALLOW THE STATUS QUO TO BE MAINTAINED IN THE EVENT THAT THE INITIATIVE IS REFUSED

Listen here February 1st speech by Alain BERSET

=> in case of rejection of the initiative, there is a bug that does not allow to obtain the status quo for those who are not allowed to strip their face.

Consequences of the counter-project

If the initiative is refused, the counter-project imposed by the Parliament allows people with veiled faces to be counted and registered by the Authorities, whereas if :

"individuals may not hide their faces, as required by the initiative",

Individuals or believer will not be subjected to this surveillance and enslavement imposed by members of the Authorities, with the counter-project.

=> People with veiled faces will be legally monitored and registered with the counter project, and those who are forced to wear the veil will not be protected. Those who force them to wear the veil will be protected !

Observation #1:

The face hidden in public is a correct dress in Islamic country, which is contrary to Swiss values

Unknown with face veiled in public in a city

The believer who hides her face must obey a divine Master, or a husband. This constraint will lead the State to record her name and to list it as shown in the Parliament’s counter-project.

Observation #2:

The completely naked body in public is a proper dress in India for a sadhu, contrary to Swiss Values

Sadhu in proper public dress in the city

There is no dress code for sadhus monks:

The ascetic SADHUS do not hide their face nor their body. They have the freedom to walk completely naked in the cities.

ONE OF THE VALUES, WHICH MAKES IT POSSIBLE TO PROTECT HUMAN RIGHTS, IS THE TRANSPARENCY ON THE OCCULT CONSTRAINT EXERTED ON CITIZENS WITH DRESS CODES

WHOSE WHO WANT TO BE FREE SHOULD FOLLOW THE WISDOM OF THE INDIAN SADHUS.

CITIZENS MUST ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE ON PARLIAMENT’S COUNTER-PROJECT WHICH DOES NOT RESPECT THE VALUE OF TRANSPARENCY AND THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN FORCED TO WEAR THE VEIL

THE EXAMPLE OF THE WISDOM OF THE SADHUS OF INDIA, WHO DO NOT STRIP THEMSELVES COMPLETELY IN SWITZERLAND WHEN THEY CAN DO IT IN THE INDIES, SHOWS THE STIGMATIZING SIDE OF THE COUNTER-PROJECT

In India, the SADHUS are yogi monks highly respected by the people and the Authorities..

They are not subject to any dress code. They are very respectful of other citizens. The most ascetic of them walk completely naked, as they came into the world.

If they would come to Switzerland and walk naked in the streets, they would be called exhibitionists, because Christian Values do not allow naked walks in cities, and they would be registered !

In practice, when they come to Switzerland, the SADHUS do not strip themselves completely, because they know that the majority of Swiss would not allow them to have the freedom of clothing they have in India!

By the wisdom of their behaviour, according to the country where they are located, the SADHUS show on the one hand the importance of this Value which is transparency, which is partially hindered by the dress codes in Switzerland, and on the other hand the importance of this Value which is the respect of the dress code of the country where they are located, which they also respect in Switzerland by not completely stripping themselves.

The Sadhus set an example by respecting the Swiss Values, when they come to Switzerland, which are neither those of their country that allow them to walk completely naked, nor those of the believers of Islamic countries forced not to be able to strip their faces. They are an example of wisdom for Parliament!

THE DANGER TO THE SWISS PEOPLE OF NOT BEING ABLE TO VOTE ON THE PARLIAMENT’S COUNTER-PROJECT, WHICH DOES NOT RESPECT SWISS HUMAN RIGHTS AND VALUES.

Reminder:

Values of Islamist countries allow clitoral excision, polygamy and submission of women to men.

The Swiss Constitution guarantees equality before the law to all Swiss citizens. If a single citizen had their rights violated, the state should protect them.

Details provided by one Federal Councillor on this counter-project

The Federal Councillor suggests that these women, who are under the influence of a religion or a husband, freely wear the veil, which seems contradictory at best !

See RTS REPLAY/forum speech Federal Councillor of 19 January 2021

The obligation for the Parliament to respect the fundamental rights of all Swiss citizens

For defenders of the Values of the Constitution, if one child or one Swiss woman has her fundamental rights violated, Parliament must protect them.

The counter-project that puts veiled believers under surveillance, without protecting them, should be subject to the vote of the people.

If the counter-project is imposed by Parliament to the Swiss people, it could encourage rich foreigners, or husbands, to impose the veil on women who travel or live in Switzerland.

With a counter-project, which has not been approved by the people, the members of the Authorities, who will have the right to monitor these veiled people, will have too much power. They could abuse this power, to cover cases of gross human rights violations, by powerful people, magistrates and husbands who discriminate against women.

Of the experience of the past that must not be forgotten

Switzerland has the sad reputation of having put in place crazy codes of procedures that no longer allow to respect fundamental rights

See Article of 7 April 2016 Of hebdo paper

Senator Philippe BAUER has already explained that there is a procedure hidden from the public, which provides that a lawyer must disobey the President of the Bar to protect the rights of a client, who is the object of a false denunciation. See comments below, dated 23.12.20.

The people cannot know this process of discrimination of citizens by the State with the power of the President of the Bar and the links that bind them to the magistrates.

If now, without the approval of the people, Parliament sets up a counter-project to monitor women, who under the influence of a religion, a husband or a "master", cannot strip their faces, there is a major bug in this vote that has not received the approval of the people.

Like the victims of crimes committed with lawyers who do not want to disobey the Bar Presidents, these women will have their fundamental rights violated with procedures that do not allow the authorities to respect the rights of the people.

We must accept the initiative to protect the rights of all citizens in order to prevent this counter-project, which has a bug, from being imposed to the people without their consent.

TOO SMALL TO BE RESPECTED

SHOUD NOT BE PART OF THE VALUES OF UBS TO SPOLIATE SMALL CLIENT ACCOUNTS WITH THE INTERVENTIONS OF THE BAR PRESIDENTS

See exhibit : 210127DE_RH

It is the challenge of Ralph HAMERS, new CEO of UBS, to ensure that the bank’s procedures do not make it possible to circumvent compliance with the Constitution, even under the constraint of members of brotherhoods of lawyers.

Ralph HAMERS
UBS CEO

TOO BIG TO FAIL

WITH THE LECON GIVEN BY THE AMERICAN SENATE, MUST ALLOW RALPH HAMERS TO SET UP PROCEDURES THAT RESPECT THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION ON LINE WITHOUT PLUNDERING THE ASSETS OF SMALL CLIENTS WITH THE INTERVENTIONS OF THE PRESIDENTS OF THE BAR

Ralph HAMERS, the new CEO of UBS, discovers in Switzerland, that if a lawyer refuses to disobey the President of the Bar, then his bank has a flawed procedure that allows members of a criminal organization, who are professionals of the law, to finance oneself on the backs of UBS clients by asking to make seizures with Securities obtained fraudulently with the relations that bind the Order of Lawyers to the Courts.

The modus operandi of the criminal organization is known. It would have been admired by Bradley Birkenfeld:

1. Members of the criminal organization, to cover their economic crime, falsely accuse a citizen of their crime, whose lawyer is the one witness to this crime and the falsity of the accusation.
2. At the Court, the President of the Bar forbids the lawyer, the one witness to the crime, to be able to testify
3. The citizen, the victim of the economic crime, has no way of proving the falsehood of the charge, because the sole witness was forbidden to testify. He is dispossessed by a flawed judgment, where his rights are violated by the Presidents of the Bar with their relationship with the judgess.
4. Members of the criminal organization ransom the victim of the economic crime by obtaining fraudulent securities based on this economic crime that is impossible to deny

Ralph HAMERS has all the elements in hand to put in place procedures that ensure live compliance with the Constitution without being polluted by the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar.

See exhibit: 210127DE_RH

To be followed !

Alain BERSET breaks the law of silence for the damage caused by Covid-19.

He is made aware that the victims of COVID-19 are experiencing the same experience as the victims of the crimes committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the bar.

Alain BERSET
FEDERAL COUNCILLOR
MINISTER OF HEALTH

He faces a more serious scourge than Covid-19: it is the damage caused by the lawyer who refuses to disobey the President of the bar

Even if it is impossible to eradicate this scourge worse than Covid-19, Alain BERSET has shown that the Federal Council can compensate the victims.

"IT IS NOT THE VICTIMS OF THE DAMAGE WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE. THEY ARE NOT AT FAULT FOR WHAT HAPPENS!"

Quote: (Interview A. Berset, TJ 19h30 /13.01.2021)

" les magasins, les restaurants, les centres culturels, les institutions culturelles, les institutions de temps libre, ne sont pas responsables, ne sont pas fautives de ce qui arrive "

Alain BERSET is made aware that in the case of the damages caused by the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR, the current Senator, Philippe BAUER, had explained in 2009 that the victims of the damages were not responsible or at fault.

The damage came only from the fact that their lawyer had refused to disobey the President of the Bar.

Observation for the damage caused by the covid-19

Scientists cannot explain how COVID-19 was born or how it works. It is not clear that the vaccine will stop the deaths and damage caused by COVID-19.

At least covid-19 has made the Federal Council aware of its virus power:  it can act as a President of the Bar who prevents the one witness of a crime from testifying, ...., and it may cause damage similar to that caused by the lawyer who refuses to disobey this President of the Bar, who prohibited the lawyer from testifying to the crime he witnessed.

Observation for the damage caused by the lawyer who refuses to disobey the President of the Bar

Senator Philippe BAUER was able to explain how the refusal of a lawyer to disobey the President of the Bar creates damage comparable to that created by Covid-19. However, there is no vaccine to put an end to the actions of the Presidents of the Bars.

In 2016, a lawyer said that it was impossible to break the law of silence on the damage caused by the lawyer who refuses to disobey the President of the Bar, in the context described by the request for a parliamentary inquiry.

See exhibit: 051217DP_GC

In this case a CEO was threatened by members of a criminal organization.

The damage caused by COVID-19 shows that the government can change procedures, even the economic model, when it knows the cause of damage. It can also determine responsibilities and compensate victims who are not responsible.

Even if Senator Philippe BAUER has no solutions to avoid the damage caused by the lawyer who refuses to disobey the President of the Bar, Alain BERSET knows that he can already say that the victims are not responsible, they are not at fault for what is happening and he can compensate them!

See exhibit 210121DE_PS

During each plenary session of the Vaudois Parliament, the President of the Parliament reminds each to each deputies that they have taken an Oath and that some are waiting for the divine blessing for their work done under Oath

SONYA BUTERA
PRESIDENT
VAUD PARLIAMENT

Expl. Session of 27.10.2020

Quote: « Je rappelle à chacune et chacun d’entre vous le serment que nous avons prêté  et pour celle et ceux que pour qui cela revêt de l’importance, j’invoque la bénédiction divine pour nos travaux. »

Expl. Other sessions

THE METHOD OF CONTROL OF THE OATH COMPLIANCE

A SHAMANE gives each deputy a method so that he can check whether their work respects his Oath and the divine will.

WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO RESPECT HUMAN RIGHTS ?

Our people have defined these fundamental rights in the Constitution, it has provided article 35 that enforce prosecutors and deputies to respect them

See : Fundamental rights Constitution

Duties of Deputies and Prosecutors: article 35 Cste

RESULTS OF THE DIVINE WORKS

Two sworn Prosecutors, Eric COTTIER and François DANTHE, understood that: what matters is the result.

They show to the members of the Parliament how the procedures, that each Member of Parliament make them follow to accomplish their work, enable them to respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution in a divine way for a part of the elected deputies.

For example :

Eric COTTIER shows that the procedures, put in place by the Parliament for the litigant to receive his court orders, has the result that the litigant do not receive them. On the other hand, Eric COTTIER shows that these procedures allows him to quote, in his court order, the existence of a lawyer determinations that he has not received!

Exhibit: 201229DE_JS

François DANTHE shows that these procedures have the quality to serve the interests of a criminal organization and to recall the observations of the expert of the Parliament, Me de ROUGEMONT, on the killing of Zug in this year of commemoration

Exhibit : 201229DE_JS

WHAT IT MEANS FOR PROSECUTORS AND DEPUTIES: TO RESPECT HUMAN RIGHTS WITH THESE RESULTS GIVEN BY THE APPLICATION OF THEIR PROCEDURES

A Shaman, who predicted the attack on New York, proposes to the prosecutors and members of Parliament, to answer 5 questions - which concern all humans - to check that human rights are respected with the application of their procedures :

1)   Why does man exist ?
2)   What is my destinity ?
3)   Do the forces of evil exist ?

....

see important information to members of Parliament/ respect of the Values of the Constitution by the Public Prosecutor /...

See TJ 19h30, of 04.01.2021

The General Prosecutor, Eric COTTIER, can confirm that in 2002, the Director of ICSA, Mr. Penel, represented a danger for Patrick FOETISCH, Chairman of the Board of Directors of ICSA, following the disappearance by the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Canton of Vaud of documents proving unfair management.

Pierre Penel
Foetisch’s right-hand
Director of ICSA

He died suddenly, without reason, after Eric COTTIER had established that Foetisch had violated the copyright with a contract that had been cancelled

The Presidents of the Bar and former Presidents of the Bar such as Senator Philippe BAUER and Me Christian BETTEX, lawyer of the State of Vaud, are aware that the codes of procedure contain delirious procedures which do not allow to respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.

See newspaper of 7 April 2016 of the HEBDO

As a delirious procedure, we have seen that the President of the Bar may forbid a lawyer, one witness of a false denunciation involving members of the Order of Lawyers, to testify. In this case, the lawyer’s client will have his life destroyed if the lawyer who wanted to testify refuses to do so because of the ban made by the President of the Bar.

We saw on this site that Senator Philippe BAUER did not find as illegal, this discrimination of citizens with this delirious procedure. He simply said that the lawyer, one witness, must disobey the President of the Bar if he does not want his client’s fundamental rights to be violated.

We saw on this site on 23.12.2020, that the senator, Philippe BAUER, even obtained a judgment from the FEDERAL COURT in 2009, which confirmed that the lawyer, member of the Order of Lawyers, had to disobey the President of the Bar and break the law of silence imposed by the President of the Bar to safeguard the fundamental rights of his client.

Senator Bauer failed to mention the risks for a lawyer, one witness, who disobeys an authority as powerful as that of a President of the Bar.

Observation

The General Prosecutor, Eric COTTIER, who knows the case well, should have asked for the right of reply on this site to expose these risks.

He could have explained that if Me Burnet had disobeyed the President of the Bar : Me Burnet could attest by testimony that the Public Prosecutor of the Canton of Vaud had made disappear the exhibits to prove the unfair management of Foetisch.

It is not excluded that Mr. Penel died because of these exhibits that disappeared, which would have allowed to indict Foetisch.

Therefore Mr.Burnet could have been in danger of death by testifying, while the President of the Bar had forbidden him to do it.

It is likely that the British judges, unlike the Federal Court, would not have agreed with Senator BAUER. They would have deemed unlawful the prohibition made by the President of the Bar to the witness to testify, instead of saying that he must disobey the President of the Bar and risk his life for having broken the law of silence imposed by the President of the Bar....

To read :  210106DE_PS

2021

HAPPY NEW YEAR

BEST OF HEALTH WISHES TO ALL OUR READERS