Principal Theme:

CLICK HERE

From 2021 to today, click here

2020

REVIEW OF THE YEAR

THANKS

CITIZENS HAVE MADE CLEAR THAT THE SILENCE OF ELECTED OFFICIALS IS NO LONGER AN OPTION FOR THOSE WHO HAVE TOO MUCH POWER AND DO NOT WANT TO UPHOLD THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION

COVID-19 HAS SHOWN THAT DEMOCRACY IS AT RISK IF ELECTED OFFICIALS PUT IN PLACE PROCEDURES THAT DO NOT MEET THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION

A BIG THANK-YOU TO CITIZENS WHO HAVE THE COURAGE TO BREAK THE LAW OF SILENCE, INCLUDING THOSE WHO ALLOW THIS INFORMATION SITE TO EXIST

TO PASS A JUDGMENT, ERIC COTTIER CLAIMS TO HAVE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT SECRET DETERMINATIONS, WHICH WERE ON THE COMPUTER OF A LAWYER, WHO HAD NOT SENT THEM YET

A request for reimbursement of penal expenses by an employee of the DGAIC, to cover the crime committed with the interventions of the President of the BAR, highlights the existence of the judgment of Eric COTTIER, above mentioned, which was rendered collectively with two other senior magistrates of the State of Vaud. There were therefore three magistrates who knew in an illicit way, or by a paranormal phenomenon, these secret determinations!

The General Director of the DGAIC has become witness of this procedural scam, with the alleged intervention of the State Espionage Service, which violates the respect for fundamental rights guaranteed by Article 35 of the Swiss Constitution.

This is a false Title made collectively by magistrates, since Eric COTTIER and his colleagues could not mention the existence of these determinations which were secret on a lawyer’s computer disk, and of which they could, without spying, not legally know the existence, when they wrote the judgment.

See exhibit 201229DE_JS

Me Jean-Luc Schwaar
DGAIC Director

This experienced lawyer is a member of the Swiss Law Society Committee.

He has the same competence as the expert of Parliament, Me François de ROUGEMONT, who has dealt with the request for a parliamentary inquiry in this matter.

See exhibit : 051217DP_GC

IT IS INEXPLICABLE THAT ERIC COTTIER COULD TAKE ACCOUNT IN A JUDGMENT OF DETERMINATIONS THAT HAD NOT BEEN SENT TO HIM YET! IT CAN ALSO BE A SCAM SET UP BY SENIOR JUDGES WITH THE INFORMATION OBTAINED BY THE STATE SPY SERVICE… TO PROVIDE BENEFITS TO MEMBERS OF BROTHERHOODS OF LAWYERS IN THE CONTEXT OF CRIME COMMITTED WITH THE INTERVENTIONS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE BARS

Me Jean-Luc Schwaar knows that justice is completely paralyzed with the introduction of new delirious procedures.

See article 160407hebdo

Me François de ROUGEMONT, the expert of the Parliament, said that it would be necessary to record all the judicial hearings with video cameras to put an end to the practices that make us shudder described in the request for parliamentary investigation,

See page 2, exhibit 071116DP_GC

Everyone will appreciate that if the court hearing - where Eric COTTIER claims with his colleagues to have taken into consideration the secret determinations - had been filmed, we would know these determinations and we would know how he obtained them!

BREACH OF PROCEDURAL GUARANTEES WITH PROCEDURES THAT ARE HIDDEN FROM THE PEOPLE, OR EVEN DO NOT EXIST

The witness, Mr. Schwaar, has been notified of the reason why his DGAIC staff must claim CHF 500 from Dr. Erni. The reason is that Dr ERNI reported that a lawyer from the CAP Legal Insurance said that the Prosecutor applied a procedure that does not exist, to protect criminal, quote :

"On the internet link above, you have been able to take note of the new procedure applied by Eric COTTIER to give benefits to third parties. He does so when he knows that the procedural codes are not applicable and that he commits an act of forfeiture by applying such a procedure.

You saw that the CAP legal counsel was adamant:  « the procedure applied by Eric COTTIER does not exist ».

See exhibit 201229DE_JS

The witness, Me Schwaar, also knows that Eric COTTIER, with two high magistrates, pronounced a judgment claiming to have taken into account secret determinations, found in the computer of the lawyer of Dr Erni, that the latter had not yet sent and of which they could not know the content

The witness, Me Schwaar, also knows that Me de ROUGEMONT said that the codes of procedures were not applicable to treat the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR

The witness, Mr. Schwaar, also knows that Senator Philippe BAUER said that witnesses, members of the Order of Lawyers, forbidden to testify by the President of the BAR, must disobey him so that the fundamental rights of their clients are not violated,

The witness, Me Schwaar, as the expert Me of ROUGEMONT must be able to answer the question of whether the President of the Bar can authorize the Prosecutor Eric COTTIER to spy on the computer of the lawyer of Dr Erni, or if this procedure does not exist! The question has not been submitted to the CAP Legal Insurance lawyer !

In any case, the director of the DGAIC can explain to the Parliament and the Council of State, that the codes of procedures are not applicable to treat the crime committed with the interventions of the President of the BAR, as had explained Me De ROUGEMONT, the expert of the Parliament.

It is obvious that the Prosecutor DANTHE, who charges CHF 500, for the procedure that does not exist that ERIC COTTIER is applying, cannot ignore it. This Prosecutor could be a member of the masonic lodge which would be at the origin of the false denunciation described in the request for parliamentary investigation

Me Schwaar can also remind the PARLIAMENT that Me de ROUGEMONT was hired to avoid a new killing of ZOUG. He said that these thrilling practices observed by the public could cause a new killing of Zug

This is an observation from a experienced lawyer who knows the relationships between lawyers and the courts!

The prankster computer (or tetanised by fear) simulates a breakdown in the trial to erase a testimony forbidden by the President of the Bar.

See anecdote on page 2 of the following letter:

Exhibit : 201222DE_SS

The public, who witnessed this hearing, filed a request for a parliamentary inquiry that immortalized the interventions of the President of the Bar.

To read : 051217DP_GC

A member of the public, freemason, witness of this judgment hearing, like the computer, recognized secret signs of members of a masonic lodge… He revealed it to the public, who announced himself as a witness to these judicial practices that make us shudder...

The failure of the prankster computer was immortalized during the processing of the request for investigation, thanks to the testimony gathered by the expert of Parliament..

See exhibit : 070116DP_FR

Me Philippe BAUER
Former President of the Bar
National Councillor PLR

MMe Philippe BAUER, our national councillor, specialist in judicial affairs and surveillance of justice, obtained, as a former President of the Bar, a judgment of the Federal Court which said :

"the witness should have disobeyed the President of the BAR to enforce fundamental rights"

…in practice the witness did not want to disobey the President of the BAR

=> As a result, the fundamental rights of victims have been violated and criminals are still at large….

Recently the majority of Swiss citizens have accepted the initiative on responsible multinationals, so that the human rights of the weakest are respected by those who have too much power.

National Councillor Philippe BAUER, who presents himself as a human rights defender guaranteed by the Federal Constitution, was against the initiative, but did not propose any solutions to ensure respect for the human rights of the weakest.

See interview RTS

The result of the votes showed that the majority of the people do not trust Philippe Bauer for his inaction as National Advisor on the violation of human rights by those who have too much power.

THE TESTIMONY OF A MEMBER OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION, ERASED BY A PRANKSTER COMPUTER DURING A HEARING O JUDGMENT, WHO GAVE PHILIPPE BAUER HIS LETTERS OF NOBILITY AND HIS ENORMOUS POWER

It is especially important to note that Me Philippe BAUER wet his shirt, proposing a new solution to fight against the crime committed with the interventions of the President of the Bar, and this prankster computer which obeys the secret signs of the members of a masonic lodge, at a judgment hearing!

Facts:

In 2005, the President of the TRIBUNAL, Bertrand Sauterel, found himself in distress when the sole witness of a false denunciation, a member of the Order of Lawyers, came to the Tribunal to say that he wanted to testify and that he could not testify, because the President of the Bar forbade him to testify.

The President of the Tribunal had to note this testimony in the Minutes, namely that « the witness wants to testify but says he cannot testify so as not to disobey the President of the Bar” »

At this precise moment, the computer simulates a breakdown and the clerk announces that the testimony has disappeared…., but there were in the room witnesses of the dishonesty of this computer which obeys the secret signs of the members of a masonic lodge.

Me Schaller asked the Court of Neuchâtel to assess by judgment that this prohibition made by the President of the Bar to the witness to testify, violates the rights of the victim. He pointed out that members of brotherhoods have important advantages that they risk losing by disobeying the President of the Bar.

…it was a Bar Association scam where the Bar Officers gave benefits to members of the lodge by prohibiting the witness from testifying…

The Court of Neuchâtel confirmed by judgment that this prohibition on the witness to testify was an unlawful act..

See exhibit 090203CC_DE

Me Philippe BAUER, former President of the Bar, who represented the Bar Association and who knew the request for a parliamentary investigation, understood very well the reason why human rights were violated

Me Philippe BAUER then asked the Federal Court to declare unlawful the judgment of Neuchâtel with the unimaginable argument that the witness, members of the bar association, must disobey the Bar President to protect the fundamental rights of his client…

Me Schaller said that it was the duty of the President of the Court to disobey the President of the Bar by declaring unlawful his prohibition made by the President of the BAR to the witness to testify !

The Federal Court ruled in favour of Philippe BAUER. The latter with this exemplary judgment which shows how he supposedly manages to enforce human rights, has received an enormous power related to the actions of the members of this mysterious masonic lodge, which manages to obtain from a computer that it simulates a breakdown during the judgment hearing to erase the testimony of the witness prohibited from testifying by the President of the BAR!

The only blemisch is that the witnesses, members of the Order of Lawyers, do not agree to disobey the BAR PRESIDENT to protect the fundamental rights of their clients. It is a real fraud and violation of human rights according to the rules of good faith !

201222DE_SS

051217DP_GC

070116DP_FR

We are in the Red Zone. . . . We warned the Federal Council. . . . but does the public not also have the right to know what the situation is?

We also have this role of transparency about the epidemiological situation towards the population

To listen to SAMIA HURST’s message to the TSR journalist who is surprised that scientists communicate to the population the data they communicate to the Federal Council

TJ19h30 of 15.12.2020

Samia HURST
Prof. UNI Genève
Physician

Curriculum Vitae

A scientist who reminds that the people, sovereign, has the right to know the data that the magistrates receive to make their decision.

Note :

The request for a parliamentary inquiry filed by the Public in 2005 on the relations that bind the Bar Association to the Courts, requested already this transparency for the population!

See exhibit : 051217DP_GC

Thanks to Professor Samia HURST for reminding us that trust in the Authorities is based on the transparency of the data provided by scientists to the Authorities and the use made of it by the magistrates and the political world!

The days of Galilee are over. It is no longer enough for magistrates to assert without evidence that the Earth is still at the center of the UNIVERSE for the scientists - who have shown that this is false - to accept it by whisper as Galileo: «…and yet it turns»

The Crypto case, the Michael Lauber case, the Cottier case, the Jacques Rayroud case, show that it is no longer enough for a magistrate or politicians to say that the codes of procedure ensure transparency and respect for the rights of the population for this to be true!

After Jacques DUBOCHET who wants the population to be informed about the red zone of the climate emergency, it is another scientific authority, Samia Hurst, who wants the people to be properly informed about the red zone of the covid-19

These two leading scientists have a common message :

"the people must have access to the data received by the political world so that they can understand the decisions and verify that these decisions, taken by the political world, respect the Values of the Constitution."

The collective amnesia of the Attorney General of the confederation, with the codes of delirious procedures set up by the legislator, no longer allow to trust decisions taken by the political world, without possible control by the population.

It is recalled here that Switzerland has adopted a new code of procedure to enforce the Values of the Constitution. The only quality of this code is to paralyze justice with delirious procedures, without any transparency, and to make the happiness of criminal organizations:

See the observation made by the professionals of the law:

160407hebdo

After the red zone of the management of covid-19 shown by Samia Hurst, that of the climate emergency shown by Jacques DUBOCHET, two magistrates sound the alarm for the red zone of the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar, by making transparent two practices that thrill allowed by the new code of procedures :

First practice that thrill :

"the invention of an alleged court appeal by a professional of the law"

This is Dina BETI who shows that her Tribunal can violate Article 35 of the Constitution by treating an alleged appeal, by cleverly substituting itself for an independent Tribunal

See exhibit: 201216DE_DB

Second practice that thrill :

"Violation art. 35 Constitution by the Criminal Court"

This is the Deputy Judge of the Criminal Court who confirmed that the judgment of 16 November 2020 grossly violates the respect of Article 35 of the Constitution by not mentioning the essential facts namely that: a criminal complaint is filed against Prosecutor Mooser before an independent Tribunal

See exhibit: 201216DE_JD

In both cases, it is the control of the content of the documents provided by a scientist that shows that the decisions of the magistrates are not related to the existing data.

Without this transparency on the data and reports of scientists provided to politicians, trust in the authorities can no longer exist.

TJ19h30

160407hebdo

201216DE_DB

201216DE_JD

"WE MUST RESTORE THE POPULAR JURIES".

In 2016, HEBDO journalist Clément Bürge sounded the alarm in his article dated 7 April about the paralysis of justice with the new Code of Procedures.

160407hebdo

According to a professional of the law, this paralysis is not a coincidence. It is the direct consequence of the suppression of the popular jury, which allows the Prosecutors to serve the interests of those who have too much power.

Eric COTTIER
General Prosecutor
State of Vaud

He is one of the prosecutors who applies the delirious procedures that would thrill a popular jury.

BY ABOLISHING THIS ORGAN, THE LEGISLATOR ABOLISHED THE DIRECT CONTROL OF THE COURTS BY THE PEOPLE.

Sir Clément Bürge quotes in his article that several lawyers deplored the suppression of popular juries.

However, he did not explain that by abolishing this organ which the people had to have to participate in judicial decisions and ensure that the magistrates respected the will of the people, the legislator abolished the direct control of the Courts by the people.

The lawyer, who explains that popular juries must be restored to put an end to the crime committed by those who have too much power, says, quote :

""… since the new Code of Procedure has excluded popular juries, the courts can do anything. The magistrates all became judges and parties at once."

On this site, we quoted one of these new delirious procedures used by the Prosecutor Eric COTTIER, see below comments dated April 15, 2020, namely that :

"To check that the defendant did indeed receive an alleged court order that he sent by mail A, the Prosecutor examines whether the post office returned the mail to him. If the post office did not return the mail to him, then he has the formal proof that the defendant received it!"

…a CAP insurance lawyer said that this procedure does not exist, see comment dated July 8, 2020…

… however Prosecutor Eric COTTIER used it to cover up the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar…

…if there had been a popular jury of citizens who filed the request for a parliamentary inquiry,

... see exhibit : 051217DP_GC

.this jury would have found the gross violation of fundamental rights by this Prosecutor, and it would have been harassed,….

This importance of the popular jury with examples of new delirious procedures was reported to the Parliament in Bern.

Documents were requested from another Prosecutor to clarify another delirious procedure…

To be continued !

160407hebdo

051217DP_GC

201209DE_JS

The Swiss people, by an absolute majority of their citizens, have said yes to the initiative on responsible multinationals.

The initiative was supported by Dick MARTY, a former Attorney General, who was a member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.

Dick Marty
Former Attorney General of Ticino

One of the few former prosecutors, defenders of the values of the Swiss Constitution, who does not believe that it is enough for one who has too much power to say :

“I have respected human rights"

...to make it true.

The people agreed with him against the Federal Council which supported the opposite with a counter-project!

Dick MARTY is one of the few prosecutors who has not been infected by the terrible disease of Michael LAUBER which is collective amnesia.

Like the Swiss people, Dick MARTY knows that silence is no longer an option when those who have too much power violate the human rights of the weakest. He showed that the role of prosecutors is to defend human rights rather than allow the strongest to dominate and destroy the lives of the weakest.

The initiative was accepted by the majority of the citizens and rejected by the majority of the Cantons.

Observations of the people for the Federal Council

To read: 201201DE_JS

A multinational (Glencore) tried to put pressure on the vote with a complaint against the initiators of the initiative.

« A citizen observed that the reason Glencore took the liberty of filing a complaint against the initiators of the initiative is that they are certain that our Prosecutors do not respect human rights »

It is neither Michael LAUBER, nor Jacques RAYROUD, nor Eric COTTIER, nor many others, who will deny this reflection of a citizen who is concerned about the functioning of our Public Ministries.

After the scandals of FIFA, Car Postal, Crypto, the crime committed with the interventions of the President of the Bar, the majority of the people have said that they expect the authorities to enforce human rights and to bring to trial those who violate human rights

The people wants full transparency on this economic crime that violates human rights

It is not the one who has violated human rights who has the competence to say that this is not true! Only a neutral and independent authority can establish it !

Observation

After that Presidents of the bar (who benefit from it) have raised the alarm about the codes of delirious procedures that do not allow to respect the Constitution :

See exhibit 160407_hebdo

The Federal Assembly should already provide access to neutral and independent courts free of charge to judge the violation of human rights and crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the bars

160407hebdo

201201DE_JS

To read exhibit :

201121MC_DE

This is the message sent by Micheline Calmy-Rey to the Swiss citizens, defenders of human rights.

Micheline Calmy-Rey
Former President of the Federal Council

An INSIDER who knows how lobbies put pressure on the Authorities

To respect the values of our Constitutional State, she contradicts the Federal Council by saying:

Vote YES to the initiative for responsible multinationals ...

... by making serious charges against those who exercise the law of silence:

Citation:

"Hello ...

I’m not in the habit of appealing as a former federal councillor, but the multinational initiative is very close to my heart...

... Encourage your family and friends to vote YES to the initiative for responsible multinational corporations

...I confess that, for as long as I can remember, I have rarely seen a voting campaign in which so many untruths were propagated on an initiative,...

Full Text : 201121MC_DE

This is a huge slap in the face for the Federal Council, from the part of its former Leader, but a great hope for children and human rights defenders who denounce the corruption and abuses of the authorities who hold power…

After the amnesia of Michael LAUBER and the corruption cases with the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar, it is time that a former Federal Councillor breaks the law of silence imposed on the Authorities by the lobbies and those who have too much power.

1) Do you know why you were born?
2) Do you know what your destiny is?
3) Do you know why you met me?
4) Do you know that in the face of death, you will be alone with full responsibility for the acts of your Life?
5) Do you believe that the forces of evil exist ?

See exhibit 201115DE_JS

Ms Simonetta Sommaruga
Président of the Swiss Confederation

At that time Dr Erni had not yet been blackmailed by the INSIDERS. His CEO had not yet been the subject of coercion by Insiders...

The request for a parliamentary inquiry did not exist. See exhibit :051217DP_GC. Mr. Penel, Foetisch’s right-hand man, had not yet died of poisoning. Mr. Schaller, lawyer, did not yet represent Dr. Erni, and Michael LAUBER was not yet General Prosecutor of the Confederation

However, the Shamaness had already announced to Dr. Erni that Me Foetisch was part of a group of INSIDERS. Inexplicably, she predicted that Dr. Erni would be under enormous pressure from these Insiders. He should unmask state leaders who violate the Values of Life and bring about change to end the violation of fundamental rights.

In 2016, the fate wants that a dissident lawyer, who also talks about Insiders, will lead Dr. Erni to contact the President of the Confederation..

See exhibit 161010DE_SS

Dr. Erni made contact because he is a physicist by profession. Like Galileo, he observes, describes what he sees and confronts it with the people concerned to verify it.

It is inexplicable for a physicist that a Shamaness predicted this fate. On the other hand, Dr Erni observes that if fate wanted to make visible the existence of Insiders who allow legal professionals to commit crimes with impunity, he chose him because he is a physicist. Note that all physicists can do this since it is their job to observe and describe the invisible!

Now it is the turn of Simonetta Sommaruga, who is a pianist, to take measures to put an end to these abominable dissonances caused by these INITIATES with a hidden right to the people.

Michael Lauber slapped Parliament with his terrible illness, the Crypto AG report slaps Parliament again.

See TJ 19.30, of 11.11.20

It is not over, Me Christian BETTEX, who made the people discover the crime committed without right with the interventions of the Bar Presidents, has just given another slap to the Parliament.

Isabelle MORET
Parliament President

is facing a big challenge :

"to put an end to the State in the State."

Example 1: FIFA case

The terrible illness Michael LAUBER was suffering from, namely collective amnesia, showed that he had received too much power from Parliament. Only the insiders of Parliament knew that.

For others, the discovery of this terrible disease was a slap in the face. They understood the need for constant coaching and to supervise the services of the State so that they respect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

Example 2: Crypto AG case

The Crypto AG report, in turn, showed that parliamentarians gave too much power to the spy service. Only the insiders knew.

It is a new slap in the face for parliamentarians who see that they must supervise and monitor the services of the State so that they respect the Values of the Constitution.

Example 3: Bar Presidents Case

It is not over, Me Christian BETTEX has recently revealed how professionals of the law can commit crime with impunity with the interventions of the Bar Presidents.

This is another slap in the face for parliamentarians who must supervise and monitor the activities of the Bar Presidents to ensure fundamental rights of the people are respected, including access to independent courts. This all the more since a magistrate and a public servant say that they want to impose the law of silence on the crime committed with the Interventions of the Bar Presidents :

See exhibit 201109DE_IG

This is another slap in the face for parliamentarians who must supervise and monitor the activities of the Bar Presidents to ensure fundamental rights of the people are respected, including access to independent courts

See TJ 19.30, of 11.11.20

Geneva’s Council of State does not want to take responsibility for not having taken into consideration the conclusions of an expert who sounded the alarm

Unlike the authorities of other cantons, the Geneva State Council has external audits carried out to supervise the work of its magistrates.

It shall take account of the observations of the experts. He acts with emergency measures when he discovers that the human rights of the weakest are violated.

Pierre MAUDET
Counsellor of State
Geneva

Pierre Maudet, who suffered from selective amnesia, is protected by the Council of State for his safety and the one of his staff

He can no longer have contact with his staff for the safety of all.

See TJ 19h30 of 28 October 2020

DSince Michael LAUBER suffered from this terrible disease which is collective selective amnesia. Since we found out this disease is contagious. Since we know that the codes of procedure promote the development of this terrible disease, Geneva magistrates have grasp the nettle. They have experts who carried out audits on the work of the magistrates who have suffered from this disease. They take into account the observations of these experts.

See TJ 19h30 of 28 October 2020

At the time of Galileo, the magistrates were always right, even if the observations of independent experts proved the contrary.

If a lawman or a magistrate asserted that the Earth was motionless in the center of the Universe, the scientist who showed by observation that it was false, was falsely accused.

The magistrates harassed him until he admitted that the Earth was at the center of the world. Galileo, stigmatized by magistrates, had to admit that she was motionless in the center of the universe.

On leaving the trial, Galileo murmured the famous maxim :

«  and yet it moves  »

The Geneva State Council sets an example by listening to the observations of external experts.

He realized that the codes of procedure do not allow to fight against this terrible disease which is the selective amnesia of judicial magistrates.

It sets an example by having an audit done on the work of magistrates and making it transparent.

The most serious danger for Swiss democracy today is the collective amnesia of high-ranking magistrates who forget the existence of the relations between the Bar Association and the Courts.

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

This collective amnesia allows members of criminal organizations to commit crimes with impunity with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar.

This is no longer Galileo’s time.

To put an end to this terrible danger for the people, the Swiss Parliament has only to set up independent courts to judge the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar

See exhibit 201030DE_IG

TJ 19h30

051217DP_GC

201030DE_IG

The warning cry of Me Christian BETTEX on the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar was heard by the supervisory authority. See comments below dated 21.10.200

Hanspeter USTER
Chairman of the  
Supervisory Authority
Of MPC

(OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL)

No one expected Michael LAUBER’s disease, which is collective selective amnesia, to be so contagious.

The supervisory authority wants to make transparency about these rules hidden from the people that allow the professionals of the law to commit crimes with impunity.

See exhibit 201022BC_DE

The crime committed by members of a criminal organization, with procedural codes that do not allow to take into account the interventions of the Bar Officers, is no longer a taboo.

Me Christian Bettex, devastated by his terrible disease, explained in detail how members of the lawyers' brotherhoods can commit crimes with impunity with the relationships that bind them to federal judges.

For each citizen to review the findings in Exhibit 201021DE_TB, after answering questions Q1 and Q2 on page 2 of Exhibit 201021DE_TB

On the basis of the observations of Me Christian BETTEX, the establishment of an independent Tribunal - able to judge the crime committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar - was requirede

See exhibit 201023DE_IM

Me Christian BETTEX became the “BRADLEY BIRKENFELD” of the Order of Lawyers. He showed the importance that the Authorities make transparent at all levels these interventions of the Presidents of the Bar to eradicate this terrible disease which is collective amnesia.

See exhibit 201028DE_IG

201022BC_DE

201023DE_IM

Stéphane HESSEL’s message is 10 years old.

See TJ, 19:30 of 21 Oct 2020

The prodigal lawyer of the Vaudois Parliament, Me Christian BETTEX, shows that this message is more true than ever for the crimes committed by members of the Order of Lawyers with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar

See exhibit 201020MailGC

Me Christian BETTEX
The prodigal lawyer
of the Vaudois Parliament

Me Christian BETTEX, devastated by the terrible disease of Michael LAUBER, launches the alert in the Vaudois Parliament for fear to change sides!

In France teachers no longer dare to speak freely about Islamism for fear of being beheaded. In Switzerland, it is the federal judges and Prosecutors who no longer dare to investigate the crimes committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar for fear of being "beheaded" during their elections.

France reacted with the highest authorities of the country who take measures with the slogan :

FEAR MUST CHANGE SIDES

See TJ, 19.30 of 19 Oct.2020

The former President of the Bar Christian BETTEX, devastated by the disease of Michael LAUBER, decided to show the Swiss authorities that the crime committed by members of the Bar Association, with the interventions of the Bar Association, is due to the fact that the Presidents of the Bar have received too much power from the Authorities. They’re above the Judges !

With a masterful demonstration, due to his terrible disease which is collective selective amnesia, he urges the indignants of the people to ask the Authorities to reduce the power of the Presidents of the Bar with a simple corrective measure :

"to set up independent Courts, with the task of judging crimes committed with the interventions of the Presidents of the Bar"

See exhibit 201020DE_GC

Parliament has the solution given by a former President of the Bar Association so that : FEAR changes of SIDES

What is Parliament going to do ? Case to be followed

A magnificent message given by Christian Lüscher to the federal judges to be elected by him.

Christian LUSCHER
National Councillor

He shows by attacking the Greens that as long as parliamentarians elect their judges, there will be no separation of powers, and only federal judges who do not want to respect the human rights of youth will be elected by preference

He reminds that judges do not have the task of verifying that the human rights guaranteed by the Constitution are respected.

Their role is limited to enforcing laws even if they do not respect constitutionally guaranteed rights.

See TJ 19h30 of Wednesday 14 October

To launch an initiative so that the people can control the work of Parliament by electing federal judges, what a magnificent message given by Christian Luscher to the Youth.

Finally, a solution proposed to ensure the respect of the Constitution by an independent oversight body elected by the people

The Public Prosecutor of the Canton of Vaud announces through his spokesperson the Prosecutor François Danthe that he no longer wants to work for the people..

Nuria GORRITE
State Council President
Vaud State

must appeal to the Office of the General Prosecutor of the Confederation to fight organized crime

See exhibit 201002DE_GC

Procedure description reminder :

200616DE_PC

The weakness of this method is that we cannot know whether the court order never existed or was not sent.

The Prosecutor François Danthe has just improved the procedure, he simply announces that the Public Prosecutor no longer deals with the complaints concerning the crime committed with the practices that are chilling, described in the request for parliamentary investigation.

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

See exhibit 201002DE_GC

To that end, He presents a whole arsenal of practices that make people shudder and use them to deny justice. See Note 1 to Note 23 in the following document : 200914FD_DA

He brilliantly shows that his new complaint handling technique is a huge step forward for the perpetrators of the crimes committed with the interventions of the Bar Presidents who will no longer be disturbed by the Public Prosecutor’s Office.

The only minor disadvantage is that the taxes of the vaudois are used to finance organized crime instead of fundamental rights

See exhibit 201002DE_GC

201002DE_GC

200914FD_DA

051217DP_GC

This prestigious Prosecutor comes to the aid of young people by offering them a legal solution with the guarantee that the deadline of the Calendes Grecques will not be exceeded.

See TJof 19:30 , of Thursday, September 30, 2020.

General Prosecutor
Eric COTTIER

The brilliant inventor of the procedure that could put an end to the Climate Emergency

« DO THE JOB OF GENERAL PROSECUTOR »

The Prosecutor Eric COTTIER showed, by example, to young people who waste a lot of time to demonstrate, that it would be enough for them to do the job of General Prosecutor to legalize the occupation of the premises of a bank.

He explained that he himself, in order to allow the wealthiest to circumvent the Constitution legally, has developed a procedure that released them for sure

It is quite simple: He puts on record that the complainants received a negative decision by mail A and that they did not applied within the time limits.

In practice, the complainants never received his decisions because the court order did not exist or was not sent. With this new cunning procedure the criminals are automatically released.

By becoming General Prosecutor, the young resistance will be able to legalize the occupations of banks etc., with the power they will have!

Here is an example :

Procedure description 200616DE_PC

Application of the procedure in the field:

See point 4 of the document 200930DE_VS

The election of federal judges has not been postponed.

The people end up with a team of federal judges who cannot enforce the values of the Constitution.

Yves DONZALLAZ
Federal Judge

Federal Judge Yves Donzallaz has shown that the system of electing federal judges does not allow the people to have an independent Federal Court that respects the Values of the Constitution.

See rts info du 10 sept.

The terrible disease of Michael LAUBER, which is collective amnesia, which was not detected before his election, shows the weakness of the system of electing judges.

Parliamentarians have become aware of this

See article le matin du 23 septembre.

Federal judges do not pass any medical examination to verify that they do not suffer from collective amnesia and that they are not under the control of malicious members of a criminal organization.

Just this week two judges of the Criminal Court of Bellinzona were diagnosed as very sick with a progressive version of Michael LAUBER’s disease.

Like Michael LAUBER, they have terrible gaps of memory to the point of forgetting that they are paid with public funds to defend the rights of the litigants and to enforce the Values of the Constitution.

A complaint has been lodged so that the State can quarantine them and prevent them from discrediting the entire judiciary with this terrible disease that seems to be linked to the interventions of the bar Presidents.

See exhibit : 200920DE_MP

It’s a really worrisome disease like the coronavirus: when these federal judges discover that prosecutors like Jacques Rayroud, Eric Cottier, Michael Lauber violated the procedural guarantees, they are so disoriented and amnesiac that it is the victims who are billed for the faults of the Prosecutors. This form of amnesia is reminiscent of prion-induced dementia. With such a lack of discernment, magistrates can be under the influence of malicious people.

The civic disobedience of young people in this context to save the climate is the only reasonable solution as long as the Federal Judges are contaminated by the terrible disease of Michael LAUBER which could be due to a prion.

le matin

200920DE_MP

It is not a collective amnesia, but the collective denial by all the fans of the prestigious school of the judiciary of Michael LAUBER

See exhibit 200914DE_GC

Jacques Rayroud

Deputy Prosecutor of Michael LAUBER after having acquired his letters of nobility with the case Paul Grossrieder

This is a simple question like the one asked to people who may be contaminated with Covid-19,

Here is the test :

1. Read the document below

051217DP_GC

2.Locate the intervention of the Bâtonnier Richard

3. Indicate the Code of Procedure where it states that an authorization from the Bâtonnier Richard is required to file a criminal complaint against a corporate lawyer who violates copyright

Your answer :

(A) This intervention by the Bâtonnier does not exist in any code of procedure, the codes of procedure do not allow to treat this intervention, the judge must recuse himself because the Tribunal is not independentt

(B) This intervention of the Bâtonnier does not exist in any code of procedure, the judge has the right to make a denial of justice, because it is a privilege granted to members of the Order of Lawyers by members of the school LAUBER

Test results :

The magistrate who answered (B) is a fan of the prestigious Michael LAUBER School of Magistrates. He is positive on the test

Three magistrates have just been detected positive to the Test. Parliament will have to confine them. See exhibit:

200915DE_MP

051217DP_GC

200914DE_GC

200915DE_MP

See exhibit 200909DE_AD

Anne-Claude Demierre
Council of Fribourg State

She will simply have to testify to the existence of procedures that give the creeps to the citizens of a rule of law

After Jacques RAYROUD, who paid tribute to Michael LAUBER by using methods that are not imaginable in a State of Law, the succession is assured for the MPC.

It is incredible, even the Department of Justice and Police does not dare to act against these young Prosecutors, who grew up with the methods of Michael LAUBER.

SILENCE IS NO LONGER AN OPTION

Even though Michael LAUBER’s methods are mesmerizing and have proven their worth in granting statute of limitations to members of criminal organizations, they have only one flaw: it discredits the entire judicial system.

Anne-Claude DEMIERRE, witness of the practice of Prosecutor who makes you shudder, will be the first President of the Council of State to recall that a Prosecutor is paid to enforce the Values of the Constitution

There is worse than the collective amnesia of Michael LAUBER. It is federal judges who report the wrongdoings of Prosecutors and charge them to victims by indicating that there is no remedies available

See exhibit 200819TP_DE

Simonetta SOMMAGURA
Federal President

In addition, federal judges did not say everything :

Voir pièce 200822DE_TP

The LAUBER method had to run at full capacity

While in 2016 silence was an option, today it is no longer with the use of these procedures, revealed by the professionals of the law, which do not appear in any code of procedure.

See exhibit 200901DE_SS

Thanks to Michael LAUBER for introducing us to the procedure of collective amnesia

Thanks to Eric COTTIER for having made us discover the procedure which makes that the litigant does not receive his orders or he receives them after the time limit of appeal is passed

Thank you to the Federal Judges of the Criminal Court for having revealed the procedure that allows them to invoice the faults of prosecutors to the victims, with an argument to tetanise of fear the litigants who address the Criminal Court!

See exhibit 200819TP_DE

In 2016, Simonetta Sommaruga knew that the dissident lawyer considered it pointless to file a criminal complaint. The people had to render justice themselves.

In 2020, the Silence is no longer an Option, if the highest magistrates of the country do not hesitate to reveal their practices that make tremble to violate the Constitution, we can try to file a criminal complaint

See exhibit 200827DE_MP

What is the Federal Council going to do to put an end to these practices that make you shudder?

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

See exhibit 200901DE_SS

051217DP_GC

200901DE_SS

Sergio ERMOTTI was briefed on the request for a parliamentary investigation on crime committed with the interventions of the bar Presidents.

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

He knows that Michael LAUBER violates the fundamental rights of small UBS clients, with procedures that violate the Swiss Constitution.

Sergio ERMOTTI
CEO UBS

His latest challenge is to show that UBS customers can trust him..

See exhibit 200826DE_SE

Sergio ERMOTTI knows the request for a parliamentary inquiry.

He was made aware that the “NOTICES OF SEIZURE OF A DEBT ISSUED BY THE PROSECUTION OFFICE” may be the result of a scam developed by Michael LAUBER with his collective amnesias and the public hidden relations that bind the Bar Association to the Courts..

He even has the evidence that Me Christian BETTEX and Me François de ROUGEMONT confirmed that the Courts were not independent and that NOTICES OF SEIZURE OF A CLAIM had been established with procedural codes which were not applicable..

He knows there’s a criminal complaint against a criminal organization. He knows that there have already been irregularities in the establishment of the forum to deal with this criminal complaint against criminal organization.

See exhibit : 200822DE_TP

As CEO, he must ensure that UBS has set up control procedures that its employees do not violate the Constitution when they receive NOTIFICATION OF SEIZURE OF A DEBT established with practices that thrill by courts that are not independent.

He is familiar with these practices, which are similar to those described by Bradley Birkenfeld and even more dishonest.

He is given notice to act so that UBS does not violate the Constitution with its procedures, knowing that the political world knows the terrible disease of Michael LAUBER which is collective amnesia.

He knows that today the Silence on Organized Crime with the Complicity of the Banks is no longer an option for the Swiss people.

No one can ignore the explanations of Me BETTEX, lawyer of the Vaudois Parliament, who explains how the Judges and the Prosecutors violate the Constitution with the interventions of the Bar Presidents.

Read on page 3, Exhibit   : 200822DE_TP : The Hidden Public Rule on Bar President Operations!

200826DE_SE

051217DP_GC

200822DE_TP

The Prosecutor General Fabien GASSER was asked to address the question of the crime committed with the interventions of the Bar Presidents at the conference of the Swiss Prosecutors.

See exhibit 181002DE_ML

Fabien Gasser
Fribourg General Prosecutor

Neither Fabien GASSER, nor Jacques RAYROUD, nor Michael LAUBER have taken steps to prevent this crime. On the contrary, Eric Cottier revealed some of the procedures used by the Public Ministries to cover up organized crime by sending A letters

In turn, it is the Justice Department of Fribourg that explains how Eric COTTIER was able to make his letters A, which are orders with appeal, arrive too late

Each one receives state administrations letters where there is no longer a postal stamp on the envelope, but a red barcode. This is the new generation of A mail. How is it that the post office waits 14 days to distribute an A mail with a red barcode, when it comes from the Justice Department of Fribourg? That was the question Dr. ERNI asked the prosecution officer.

See exhibit 200809DE_OP

The prosecution officer of the Justice Department tells him that it is normal, that he received it only on August 5, because before there were court recess. Note that this letter A is indeed dated July 21. If it is invoked in court, it will be this date that will refer, not August 5..

The prosecution officer showed that with digital technologies, it is easy for Eric COTTIER to send a letter A, that the litigant receives only after the time limits for appeal have expired..

If the Public Prosecutor programs the Greek Calends with his red barcode, the defendant will never receive his order. This is the case for the order that the General Staff of ERIC COTTIER allegedly sent for not having to investigate the fraud committed by the Order of Lawyers with the interventions of the bar President and the coercion exerted on the lawyers of Dr Erni.

After the collective amnesias of the General Prosecutor of the Confederation, on sessions without protocols, there are the red barcode of the justice services that allow to deceive the readers of a mail on its date of receipt by the recipient.

Why not use digital technologies to track Prosecutors and their couriers, such as tracking COVID carriers. Why not monitor with image recognition, as China knows how to do, the country’s top judges who have not understood that engineers are not there to help them violate the rights of citizens.

…. collective amnesia, letters A that do not arrive, the interventions of the bar Presidents show that the Initiates exist and that silence is no longer an option…

Prosecutor Eric Cottier, contaminated by the collective amnesia virus, will not be able to justify his silence on the crime committed with the interventions of the bar Presidents by invoking this terrible disease to which succumb of the Prosecutors.

General Prosecutor
Eric COTTIER
infected with the virus
of collective amnesia

In 2016, Fabien Gasser was President of the Conference of Prosecutors and Michael LAUBER Vice-Presidentt.

He was asked to deal with the case of crime committed with the interventions of the bar Presidents described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry.

.

See exhibit 051217DP_GC

Michael LAUBER was informed

See exhibit 181002DE_ML

At that time, a dissident lawyer said that words were no longer useful. Prosecutors of the MPC wanted to impose the law of silence to this lawyer.

This year, the Administrative Court followed the slogan of young people who say that “SILENCE IS NO LONGER AN OPTION” by saying that “MICHAEL LAUBER’S COLLECTIVE AMNESIA IS NOT AN OPTION”

The first consequence is that the Prosecutor Eric COTTIER will not be able to invoke collective amnesia to explain his new procedure invented for not investigating the criminal complaint against the Deputy Prosecutor of Michael LAUBER .

The Prosecutor François DANTHE now speaks of denial of justice, but the exact name would be the «collective denial of justice», because several Prosecutors have been contaminated by this virus, including the Prosecutor FABIEN GASSER

See exhibit 200728MP_DE

Politicians want to cancel the office of General Prosecutor. They are not all wrong. This would prevent the gathering of the Conference of Prosecutors and the spread of the Collective Amnesia Virus.

Me Andrea Caroni
President Judicial Commission

He is the first President of the Judicial Commission to demand the dismissal of the General Prosecutor of the Confederation for having violated his Oath to respect the Constitution

See TJ of 24 July 2020

General Prosecutors Michael LAUBER and Jacques RAYROUD have agreed with the dissident lawyer by the way they handled the FIFA case, and the request for a parliamentary inquiry into the economic crimes committed by Me Patrick Foetisch with the interventions of the bar Presidents.

To rediscover these thrilling methods, described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry, which violate the rights guaranteed by the Constitution and which are no longer an option:

see exhibit : 051217DP_GC

The appointment of Special Prosecutor Stephan KELLER may break the law of silence:

See TJ 19h30 of 30 July 2020

The reaction of parliamentarians who want to reform the functioning of the Public Ministries is an awareness that the violation of the rules of good faith by General Prosecutors is no longer an option :

See TJ 19h30 of 26 July 2020

Anne-Claude Demierre is familiar with the interventions of the Presidents of the bar described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry. She knows that in year 2017, Dr Erni get an interview with the President of the Parliament, Mr. Bruno Boschung. This interview allowed Mr Bruno Boschung  to understand immediately why the interventions of the Presidents of the bar violated the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

She knows that the President of the Parliament has never been able to clarify the reasons allowing to justify the fraud committed with these interventions of the bar Presidents. She knows that it is the Omerta exercised by the General prosecutors that allows criminals to escape justice.

It is his turn to address this open issue.

Anne-Claude Demierre
Council of State Fribourg
President

To reread the request for a parliamentary inquiry :

051217DP_GC

In 2017, the legislator claimed that the people could trust the highest Prosecutors of justice such as, Michael LAUBER, Jacques RAYROUD, Eric COTTIER, etc. According to him, they were above all suspicion.

Today, Silence is no longer an option. The Presidents of the Councils of Swiss States know that the people can no longer trust these Prosecutors.

They know that these prosecutors were aware of the request for a parliamentary inquiry. The latter testified to the existence of practices, which make us shudder, applied by the high magistrates of the Courts to give advantages to members of brotherhoods of lawyers.

They know that an interview on this request for a parliamentary inquiry, made by an elite of witnesses, allows them to see the panoply of practices that make organized crime shudder. The interventions of the bar Presidents or the hearings without protocols of the Prosecutor LAUBER are only the tip of the iceberg

Anne-Claude DEMIERRE, in particular, after the WEINSTEIN case, knows that Silence is no longer an option. She is in the right place to protect the rights of the victims of those violators of the Constitution who have too much power.

Like all Swiss citizens, Anne-Claude DEMIERRE knows that the people cannot admit that a General Prosecutor like Michael LAUBER, or the Prosecutors of the Canton of Fribourg, can allow a P. Foetisch to obtain the prescription with the interventions of the Presidents of the bar.

She knows that the INFANTINO–LAUBER case no longer allows us to observe silence on the practices that make us shudder, cited in the request for a parliamentary inquiry. She knows that the former President of the Grand Council, Mr. Bruno Boschung, is a key witness!!

She knows that this is a real state scam committed by these prosecutors who knew the request for parliamentary investigation. Above all, she knows that she has the means to act, just as women have found the means to act against a Harvey Weinstein who had too much power! !

See you on August 19!

200727DE_CE

051217DP_GC

200727DE_CE

The Office of Prosecutions states that it is not possible to interrupt the prescription against a lawyer who has made a mistake at the address of his study.

See : 200710OP_DE

Me Christian Bettex demonstrates that a lawyer can refuse to disclose his private address, which forces his client to go through an abusive and costly procedure in order to interrupt the prescription. The  General Prosecutor of the Canton of BERN has been made aware of  this discrimination of citizens

See exhibit: 200720DE_MP

Address to interrupt the prescription :
Me Christian BETTEX
SELANÈCHE 17, 1009 Pully

For all those who do not know this private address, you will be told that it is necessary to check all the controls of the inhabitants of the Municipalities of Switzerland, until a Municipality informs you that Me Christian BETTEX is domiciled in their Municipality. Several Municipalities charge the request for information: 20 francs.

If you need to contact 100 municipalities before finding the municipality where Me Christian BETTEX is domiciled, it could cost you 2,000 CHF, plus working hours, or 4,000 CHF if we consider that the applicant can also charge 20 CHF by request.

While waiting for the legislator to put an end to this privilege of lawyers, it is recommended that all citizens make on social networks a register of the lawyers' private addresses, where each communicates the private addresses of the lawyers he knows.

It will be :

THE FREE PUBLIC REGISTER OF LAWYERS' PRIVATE ADDRESSES

The first address in this register is :

Me Christian BETTEX, SENALÈCHE 17, 1009 PULLY

Suggestion :

When a lawyer refuses to give his private address, one could plan to make a flashmob at his private home, broadcast on youtube, to show that this lawyer discriminates against his clients!

Thank you to Me Christian BETTEX, this former President of the bar for showing how the absence of this register of private addresses of lawyers allows the professionals of the law to discriminate citizens!!

200710OP_DE

200720DE_MP

The violation of human rights by the Prosecutors can no longer protect the Men who have too much power like Harvey WEINSTEIN, Jeffrey EPSTEIN, etc.

Alexander ACOSTA
Former Prosecutor of Florida State
TRUMP Secretary for Labour

The #Metoo movement has shown that the victims of Power Men no longer accept SILENCE on the protections granted to Power Men by Prosecutors

See 200715_MPT

Like the Prosecutor Alexander ACOSTA who protected the couple Jeffrey EPSTEIN, the Prosecutor Eric COTTIER found the means by his actions to protect the Men of Power, members of brotherhoods of lawyers, with a procedure hidden from the public.

Former Prosecutor Alexander ACOSTA can testify that the #Metoo movement no longer allows a Prosecutor to grant secret protections to POWER Men by violating victims' fundamental rights.

See TJ of 19:30 of 14 July, EPSTEIN CASE

See also the article of Francis Pryer in the diplomatic world of October 2019 on page 10

Article by F. Pryer

In Switzerland, the General Prosecutor, Eric COTTIER, makes even stronger by inventing procedures that do not exist to grant protections to Presidents of the bar and the Man of Power, who is Foetisch, whose criminal offences he knows.

The Vaud Parliament, which elected this Prosecutor, must now examine the respect of human rights in the Vaud State, which no longer exists with the actions of Prosecutor Eric COTTIER.

See exhibit : 200715DE_GC

200715DE_GC

200715_MPT

After Pierre MAUDET, Michael LAUBER, it is Eric COTTIER’s turn to violate the procedural guarantees

He does it for the happiness of criminals and the misfortune of litigants!

Vaud State
General Prosecutor
ERIC COTTIER

With an astounding front, Eric COTTIER, made a litigant believe that, according to the code of procedure, the latter had the burden of proof that an court order, which he did not receive, had been sent to him.

See point below dated 15.04.20

Why is it that the highest magistrates of the country - who must ensure the respect of the Constitution - allow themselves to lie and violate the procedural guarantees, …., even with arrogance!

Pierre MAUDET gives a first answer by refusing to resign :

Pierre Maudet shows that the legislator has so strongly protected the high magistrates, that if the high magistrates lie and do not resign, they put the institutions in crisis! 

See TJ 19h30 of Tuesday 6 July, interview with Laurent Dufour

Michael LAUBER made the same demonstration by applying again as General Prosecutor, when he had lied

Michael LAUBER shows that if the lie has become a normality for a high magistrate, it destabilizes the institutions

ERIC COTTIER vient de rejoindre ces hauts magistrats qui trompent le peuple avec un mensonge. Cette violation des garanties de procédures a été constatée par une juriste de la CAP PROTECTION JURIDIQUE

Eric COTTIER could destabilize our institutions with his incredible lie, which is incomprehensible and unpredictable from the part of the highest magistrate of the Vaud State, who has the duty to fight against organized crime

To be continued !

Delegating is a quality, on the condition to ensure that the result is achieved.

Anne-Claude Demierre has the quality of knowing how to delegate, but she did not know the rules taught in management schools to manage organized crime.

When the result is not achieved, it is these rules, which specify the responsibility of the President of the State, that apply and allow to respect the Constitution

Anne-Claude Demierre
President of the State Council of Fribourg

The President of the Council of State had delegated to Me Maurice ROPRAZ, the processing of the violation of fundamental rights, caused with the interventions of the bar Presidents, described in the request for parliamentary investigation.

051217DP_GC

Me Maurice ROPAZ acted too late. The damage worsened without the fundamental rights were restored.

Certainly, he confirmed that the people could not know that Foetisch had told the Truth when he said that his offences would never be investigated.

Of course, he confirmed that the people cannot know the interventions of the bar Presidents that allow members of a criminal organization to use the State Power to commit crimes with full impunity.

However, he did not manage in 5 months to restore the fundamental rights of citizens.

It is the management rules taught to fight against criminal organizations that must now apply.

See exhibit 200701DE_AD

The President of the Council of State, who has the responsibility of the result, must take back the wheel.

She has proof that the codes of procedure do not allow to take into account the interventions of bar Presidents to put an end to the activities of this criminal organization infiltrated in the State.

200701DE_AD

051217DP_GC

The State Councillor, Me Maurice ROPRAZ, lawyer by profession, gives instructions to enforce fundamental rights.

Me Maurice ROPRAZ
Councillor of STATE Fribourg

He is the Great Specialist of the illicit damages created with the interventions of the Presidents of the bar.

His magic formula to repair the damage caused by the interventions of the Presidents of the bar, as well as to obtain the respect of fundamental rights, is :

"the filing of a complaint LP17"

His instructions, to file a complaint LP17 in the aim to access to neutral and independent Courts and to repair the damage, are followed under his direction as coach and mentor

Phase 1 :
The complaint LP17 was filed with the mention that: "it is Me Maurice ROPRAZ who wants to show that this means makes it possible to enforce fundamental rights in the case described by the request for parliamentary investigation"

See exhibit: 200603DE_TC

Phase 2:
The President of the Court Christine OVERNAY asked for clarification on the instructions given by Maurice ROPRAZ to ensure the respect of fundamental rights

See exhibit: 200608CO_DE

Phase 3:
Ms Christine OVERNAY is put in contact with the coach, State Councillor, to apply the complaint LP17. The latter can thus answer the questions she would have on the way in which the LP17 complaint can ensure access to neutral and independent Courts and repair the damage

See exhibit:200624DE_CO

Phase 4:
It remains only to Me Maurice ROPRAZ to show that his procedure works when Patrick Foetisch obtains the penal prescription simply by not responding to the summons of the President of the bar.

See exhibit: 070329PB_TC

This request for permission to obtain from the President of the bar to file a criminal complaint is a procedure hidden from the public that violates fundamental rights as well as access to neutral and independent Courts.

This is an example of the interventions of the President of the bar who create damage by allowing criminals, with a title of lawyer, to escape justice

051217DP_GC

070329PB_TC

200603DE_TC

200608CO_DE

200624DE_CO

The new generation of demonstrators makes the following statement very clear for the authorities:

Demonstration in Geneva on 10 th June for the respect of human rights guaranteed by the Constitutions

The Silence of the Authorities violated the fundamental rights of Georg FLOYD, it killed him, it is no longer an option

Wenn das Volk führt, werden die Führer folgen.

See exhibit 200616_FDV

The association «THE FRIENDS OF THE CONSTITUTION» could become the first independent supervisory organization of the respect of the Constitution by the Authorities, that allows citizens to put an end to the actions of elected officials who abuse their power.

The request for a discharge from Bertrand TSCHANZ to break the silence of the violation of fundamental rights, by those who must render justice, could become a standard procedure.

This is just the tip of the iceberg. For example, who knows that when you sign a deposition report, the state can refuse you a copy??

See exhibit  200610DE_CE

Who drafted such procedures that clearly violate the fundamental rights of citizens?

200616_FDV

200610DE_CE

The Prosecuting Officer, Bertrand Tschanz, has proof that he has received fraudulently established Securities with codes of procedure which are not applicable.

200430DE_OP

He is aware of the existence of a record that shows that these fraudulently established Securities are linked to a horrible blackmail done on a CEO. He knows that the General Prosecutor of the Confederation and members of the Fribourg judicial order are concerned.

200506DE_OP

He knows that he has the power to act so as not to violate fundamental rights. He knows that a dissident lawyer has launched an offensive against those who violate fundamental rights, based on this and other recordings. He knows that he is putting himself in danger if he violates fundamental rights rather than respecting article 35 of the Constitution.

200327DE_IG

He knows that the President of the Council of State is aware of the violation of fundamental rights with the interventions of the BAR Presidents

200429DE_CE

He knows that she can act to avoid having to violate the fundamental rights of citizens with these fraudulently established Titles with codes of procedure which are not applicable.

Anne-Claude Demierre
President of Fribourg
Council of State

Like the Minneapolis Authorities, the President of the State Council has the power and duty to uphold human rights

She knows that Me Schaller was prevented from being able to represent his client by the Vaudois Council of State, when he had taken the mandate to defend him and had the power of attorney

150907RS_DE

The President of the Council of State is a mother. She knows that young people have to be able to trust the authorities.

She knows that young people will never accept a justice system that helps criminals violate the rights of other citizens with processes that make them shudder

200605DE_CE

Young people understand that silence is not an option in the face of discrimination!

See : TJ 19:30 of 10th June

MINNEAPOLIS HIGH AUTHORITIES REACT TO RESTORE JUSTICE FOR ALL.

The high authorities want to dismantle the rotten part of the judiciary.

They want to remove the immunity that protects public servants who use their power to violate human rights

See TJ 19:30 of Monday 8th June

THANKS TO A RECORDING SHOWING THE HORRIBLE BLACKMAIL MADE BY A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION ON A CEO, THE HIGH AUTHORITIES OF THE STATE OF FRIBOURG KNOW HOW THE JUDICIAL APPARATUS IS USED BY MEMBERS OF BROTHERHOODS OF LAWYERS TO VIOLATE FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS. THE ENTIRE FUNCTIONING OF THE SWISS JUDICIAL SYSTEM IS CHALLENGED BY THE TRANSPARENCY PROVIDED BY THIS RECORDING. IT SHOWS THAT JUSTICE DOES NOT EXIST FOR ALL IN SWITZERLAND.

Citizens are asking for justice for all

The Prosecution Officer knows that an elite of citizens has filed a request for a parliamentary inquiry into this dysfunction of the judicial system that allows members of brotherhoods of lawyers to commit crimes with impunity. See exhibit 051217DP_GC

BREACH OF ACCESS TO INDEPENDENT TRIBUNALS BY PARLIAMENT

He knows that the expert of the Vaudois Parliament, who processed the request for a parliamentary inquiry, explained that :

1) Courts were not independent of the lawyers brotherhoods.

2) Codes of procedures were not applicable because they do not allow to take into account the interventions of the BAR Presidents

He knows that this is the means used by members of the brotherhoods of lawyers to obtain that prosecutors and magistrates of justice allow them to spoliate citizens with false denunciations.

POWER AND DUTY OF THE PROSECUTING OFFICER TO RESPECT HUMAN RIGHTS

The Prosecution Officer knows that he has the power and duty to request a discharge from the President of the Council of State to avoid violating fundamental rights.

See application for discharge : 200604DE_BT

He knows that the latter has the power to act as the Minneapolis authorities did when they discovered the recording that showed the malfunctions of the judiciary.

200605DE_CE

The Prosecution Officer has documents that give evidence of human rights violations, including :

the request for a parliamentary inquiry

051217DP_GC

The intervention of the President of the BAR, Me Richard, which prevents the filing of the criminal complaint against Foetisch so that he can obtain the prescription by not responding to his summons

070329PB_TC

The violation made to Me Schaller by the Council of State of Vaud to be able to defend his client.

150907RS_DE

The document that explains the protection given by the discharge, to avoid having to violate fundamental rights, even if it is threatened by high magistrates.

200608DE_BT

The Prosecution Officer is officially informed by this site that the lawyer of the State of Vaud, who prevented Me Schaller from defending his client, is also the BAR PRESIDENT who intervened to prevent the President of the Court from having Mr. Burnet testify, in the request for a parliamentary inquiry. 

The prosecution officer must know that the dissident lawyer had announced that the Federal Court would confirm this prohibition on Mr. Schaller from being able to represent his client. The facts proved him right. He announced a strike against those who violate fundamental rights.

Swiss judges behave like modern-day slavers. Young people want justice for all and transparent. The rotten part of the judiciary must be dismantled.

See TJ 19:30 of 8th June

Video

He died because three sworn white civil servants, who swore to respect the rights guaranteed by the American Constitution, watched him suffocate instead of defending his fundamental rights.

"They only did it because he was black instead of white"

The observation in the USA is that if the high authorities of the country do not want to enforce human rights, it is the beginning of the civil war !

See TJ 19:30 of Sunday, 1st June

It is the transparency of information that makes the country evolve

The Courts are then forced to uphold the Constitution by judging those who violate human rights

The situation in Switzerland for the respect of human rights guaranteed by the Constitution

In Switzerland we have an even worse situation than in USA with the members of the brotherhoods of lawyers who have their own rules

Unlike the United States, which can try crimes committed by whites against blacks, Switzerland has no independent court to try crimes committed by members of brotherhoods of lawyers against the people !

It is the challenge of the citizens to obtain that the High Authorities of the country break the silence on this power of members of brotherhoods of lawyers

See exhibit 200603DE_MR

Young people do not know that members of Brotherhoods of lawyers can commit crimes with full impunity, because of the lack of transparency of the country’s high authorities.

They must be informed : See exhibit 200605DE_CE

See TJ 19h30 du 20.05.20

Me Maurice ROPRAZ declares a new alert :
the game is not won to restore confidence to citizens!

He stresses that his Title of Lawyer does not allow him to enforce fundamental rights

Me Maurice ROPRAZ
Fribourg State Councillor

Even if he cannot act, Me Maurice ROPRAZ can confirm the facts established by the expert of the Vaudois Parliament which show the violation of fundamental rights.

He is given notice to confirm the facts established by the expert of the Vaudois Parliament and for avoiding a new killing of Zug

See exhibit 200525DE_MR

"THE DISMISSAL OF THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO RESTORE RESPECT FOR THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF VICTIMS OF ORGANIZED CRIME INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE BAR""

As Michael LAUBER with his Staff, Maurice ROPRAZ, lawyer and State Councillor, knows that a President of the Board of Directors of a company, with a Title of lawyer, can obtain the criminal prescription on his crimes by not responding to the summons of the BAR President..

Me Maurice ROPRAZ declares the alert that a State Councillor, with a Title of lawyer, can do nothing to protect the victims of such crimes. He does not have the means to enforce the fundamental rights of victims. He has no solution to propose !

On the other hand, he does not exclude that State Councillors, who do not have the title of lawyer, including the President of the Council of State of Fribourg, have the power to enforce fundamental rights!

See exhibit 200527DE_CE

Me Maurice ROPRAZ can however confirm facts that show the violation of fundamental rights, by the members of the Order of lawyers, in the case where he is given notice to do so

Formal notice

Me Maurice ROPRAZ is therefore given notice to confirm the facts established by the expert of the Vaudois Parliament, which show the violation of fundamental rights with the interventions of the Presidents of the BAR

See exhibit 200525DE_MR

The members of the new Judicial Commission of Parliament have just shown that they are aware that they have the power to enforce the Federal Constitution, even if the General Prosecutor and his Staff does not process ion time complaints to give statute of limitations to accused persons.

The confirmation by Maurice ROPRAZ of the facts established by the parliamentary expert is essential to reduce the risk of a civil war with digital weapons soon available to the public.

See exhibit 200527DE_CE

200525DE_MR

200527DE_CE

051217DP_GC

070329PB_TC

How did the FIFA defendants get the prescription of the offence? What happens in the other cases handled by the Attorney General and his General Staff?

The Judicial Commission and its President, Andrea GARONI, have a great responsibility to answer these questions. They must verify that Prosecutor Lauber respects the Constitution with his way of working!

See interview of May 13, 2020 de Andrea GARONI.

The State Councillor, Philippe BAUER, reacts by saying that a file must be established and a decision must be taken.

See reaction of May 13, 2020 of Philippe BAUER

His statement is worrisome, when we know that Philippe BAUER says that a Bar President has the right to prevent a Prosecutor from investigating a criminal complaint so that criminals get the prescription of the offence!

Andrea GARONI
CJ Président
LAWYER

Should we consider that the President of the Bar of FIFA intervened with the General Prosecutor Michael LAUBER so that the FIFA defendants could get the prescription?

This disrespectful scenario of the Constitution is very likely. In fact, Philippe BAUER was himself the subject of a criminal complaint that the Prosecutor LAUBER with his General Staff prevented from investigating.

This criminal complaint concerned the interventions of the President of the Bar, that allow criminals, members of brotherhoods of lawyers, to commit crimes with impunity

See exhibit: 200518DE_CJ

The approach of Andrea GARONI, President of the new judicial commission, to want to question the Attorney General, is very important.

The questions will have to be about constitutional compliance.

He is the ideal President to clarify the existence of these interventions of the President of the BAR, which allow to violate fundamental rights.

Citizens need to know whether Parliament is defending the values of Philippe BAUER or those of the Swiss Constitution

These Constitutional Values had been described by Me François de ROUGEMONT, the parliamentary expert who had processed the request for parliamentary inquiry

De Rougemont was a lawyer himself. He said that the procedural codes were not applicable in the "OA" case. Yet Philippe BAUER used them to give advantages to his brotherhood !

Prosecutor LAUBER protected him by knowing the contents of the request for parliamentary investigation

See exhibit : 051217DP_GC

To be continued !

On 21 February 2020, Nicolas Mattenberger was elected Member of Parliament. He discovered the request for a parliamentary inquiry.

See exhibit : 051217DP_GC

He can confirm to the parliamentarians, that they allow the members of his brotherhood to commit crimes with impunity with a rule hidden to the people.

Me Nicolas Mattenberger
Vaud Parliament Deputy
Bar Association Member

This rule, hidden from the people, was highlighted in 2006 by the parliamentary expert who had to process the request for a parliamentary inquiry.

He raised the question:

« “What was the reason given by Bar President Richard to deny your lawyer the right to file a criminal complaint against Patrick Foetisch, when he had violated the copyright and was going to reach the prescription for the penal offence.»

The answer was :

« That Foetisch did not respond to the summons of the Bar President. »

It is likely that among the 150 members of Parliament, the majority of them do not know that it is enough for a member of his brotherhood not to answer to the Bar President summons to obtain the criminal prescription on a penal offence.

Me Nicolas MATTENBERGER can confirm to all the deputies that this rule does not appear in any code of procedure, as explained, Me de Rougemont, the expert of Parliament in 2006.

See exhibit 200512DE_NM

In 2007, the parliamentary expert, Me De ROUGEMONT, had already repeated it to the Public delegation. Nicolas MATTENBERGER had been kept out of the processing of this request for a parliamentary inquiry by Me De Rougemont.

See exhibit 070827DP_GC

Today, he is the witness who must raise the alarm to put an end to this situation. As a member of Parliament, he cannot allow his brotherhood to discredit Parliament with a right hidden to the people.

Christian Luscher
Parliament Leader
CJ MEMBER

(Judicial Commission Member)

Christian Luscher called back on the news, that a company blocked by confinement no longer generates revenue. This endangers the Swiss economy

See TJ 19h30, 3.05.2020

He will have to reveal the technique of the *NOBLE REASON" which allows an executive Board President, member of the Bar Association, to obtain the prescription simply by not responding to the convocations of the Bar President.

The members of the Judicial Commission will have to clarify the reasons why, the public does not know that an executive board President of company can obtain the prescription for criminal offences that he commits with impunity at the following condition:

“to be a member of the Bar Association and not to respond to the summons of the Bar President”

See exhibit 200507DE_CJ

In 2007, Me de Rougemont, an expert of Parliament, had explained these shortcomings of the codes of procedure.

See 070928DP_GC

He had said that this prescription, obtained by the members of the Bar Association, who are not responding to the summons of the bar President, could provoke a new killing of Zug.

Is that what the Prosecutors are trying to do ?

The only thing, which is sure,is that by being able to obtain the prescription by not responding to the summons of the President, an executive board President, member of the Bar Association, can block a company, as does the confinement due to the coronavirus.

As Christian Luscher explains, this jeopardizes the economy.

What will Michael Lauber answer to question Nr 6 ? 

(question 6 is at page 7 of exhibit 200205DE_ML)

Defendants obtain prescription with General Prosecutor violating procedural guarantees

See TJ 19h30 27.04.2020

The National Councillor, Lorenz HESS, does not appreciate the way in which Parliament is ridiculed to the people by the General Prosecutor, whom he elected.

Lorenz HESS
National Councillor

He recalls that the lack of transparency of the General Prosecutor’s work is unacceptable

He is calling for the dismissal of the General Prosecutor

The General Prosecutor must be transparent. He does not have the right to conduct secret sessions, just as a motorist does not have the right to drive in the wrong direction on the highway.

The one who has a lot of power cannot afford to do what another citizen could not do.

An expert of the Vaudois Parliament has already made the same analysis as Lorenz HESS. He name is François de Rougemont.

The latter had been mandated by the Vaudois parliament to make transparent the actions of the judicial magistrates after the killing of Zug.

Here is an example on the lack of transparency, given by Me de Rougemont, which shows a dysfunction of justice, as noted by Lorenz HESSS

Me de Rougemont had to address the following request for parliamentary inquiry : 051217DP_GC

After reading the request for inquiry, he asked the question :

« What is the reason given by President Richard for refusing to allow Mr. Foetisch to be the subject of a criminal complaint? »

When he became aware of the invoked reason by the President of the Bar, he said that this type of reason could lead to one killing of Zug.

No General Prosecutor wanted to know this Noble REASON invoked by the President of the Bar to prevent the filing of a criminal complaint against Foetisch.

No parliamentarian knows this Noble REASON, while it puts them in danger of death.

The General Prosecutors used this prohibition against filing a complaint, made by the President of the Bar, to grant the prescription to Mr. Foetisch

This Noble REASON is like the content of the secret interviews between Michael LAUBER and the FIFA defendants. It is used to cover up organized crime. The lack of transparency ridicules the parliamentarians who elected these magistrates and puts them in danger of death without them knowing it

This Noble REASON invoked by the President of the BAR will be revealed to the President of the Council of State, who was also deceived by the General Prosecutor

See 200429DE_CE

A draft amendment to the Code of Procedure was submitted to the Fribourg Parliament to enhance the function of Prosecutor by making his actions transparent and by involving him in the results he obtained.

See 200427_24H

(Update of April, 30th)

See Project submission to Parliament:

200430DE_KW

200430DE_KW

200427_24H

CORONAVIRUS has destroyed the fabulous grey curtain that has surrounded PUNJAB for 30 years

The Punjab Paradise, protected by
the fabulous grey curtain of economists, as always known by young people under 30.

For the first time, PUNJAB youth discover that economists, who set up this fabulous grey curtain, were hiding a wonder of the world: «the HIMALAYAN chain

See TJ 19h30, 13/04/2020

The grey curtain of the Punjab Paradise severely damaged by the CORONAVIRUS reveals to young people :
Another World

Thanks to the deaths of the CORONAVIRUS, two Fribourg judges, Dina BETI and Catherine OVERNAY, have just realized that the immobilization of a company by Bâtonniers, with a VERY NOBLE REASON KEPT SECRET, violates the Constitution and creates damage.

These judges heard the alarmist statement of the General PROSECUTOR, Eric COTTIER. The latter complains about the new procedures, put in place by some parliamentarians, which he must applied to respect this very NOBLE REASON.

These judges will ask the General Prosecutor, Eric COTTIER, to reveal to all Parliamentarians this very NOBLE REASON, which allows the Bâtonnier to immobilize a company and to create economic damages like a coronavirus.

In 10 days, not only will the CORONAVIRUS have destroyed the grey curtain that hid the HIMALAYAS from the young, but it will also have made all the transparency on this very NOBLE REASON, which can be invoked by the Bâtonniers to allow the economists to violate the Constitution.

Thanks to Dina BETI and Catherine OVERNAY to reveal to all parliamentarians: the very NOBLE REASON invoked by the Bâtonniers which allows them to immobilize a company.

Read : 200421DE_DB

To read the message sent to the Vaudois Parliamentarians who do not know the very NOBLE REASON :

200422DE_GC

Soon on this site, everyone will know the very NOBLE REASON, which can invoke the Bâtonniers to immobilize a company

200422DE_GC

TJ 19h30

Read :

Prosecutor’s response

General Prosecutor
Eric COTTIER

The new procedures, which the legislator makes him do, do not works !

These new procedures could lead to the killing of Zug, according to the expertise of Me de Rougemont

He has the burden of proof that an order has been received by the recipient and the new procedures are flawed.

He said that orders should be sent by registered mail so that he has proof that the recipient has received it

Read page 11 and 12 of Exhibit  200414DE_EC

All parliamentarians are notified of the malfunctioning of their new procedures

Read : 200415DE_GC

60 seniors were confined in a Vaud EMS RETREAT HOUSE. They were infected without their knowledge by those who were supposed to protect them. They died because the procedures put in place to protect them were not designed to protect them from coronavirus

Pandemic professionals warned the Authorities that those who had to protect them had neither the equipment nor the proper procedures to protect these seniors from a virus escaped from a P4 laboratory

Listen:

TJ 19h30 du 4 avril

This is the sad record of the Vaud executive power which failed to manage the risk of coronavirus for EMS RETREAT HOUSE

MORALITY

If the authorities want to avoid deaths, they must set up procedures that are efficient.

This is true for all areas, as the Zug killing showed it in the past

In 2001, there were 14 bereaved families in Zug because the legal procedures that Parliament had put in place were flawed. Their deaths were caused by these procedures which should have protected them.

The Vaud Parliament commissioned an expert to identify flawed legal procedures that endangered citizens and could lead to the death of parliamentarians.

In a request for a parliamentary investigation, the parliament expert had identified two procedures allowing the President of the Bar to obstruct and distort the judicial action. These procedures violated human rights and could lead to the death of Members of Parliament.

The first procedure was the authorization required of the President of the Bar to file a complaint against a member of a association of lawyers

The second procedure was the prohibition that the President of the Bar can make to a single witness of a false denunciation to testify

See investigation request :051217DP_GC

Parliament’s expert explained that :

1) No President of the Court could disobey the President of the BAR

2) In order not to disobey the President of the Bar, a President of the Court may issue an order violating human rights, (=Denial of justice)

None of these procedures allowing a President of the Bar to falsify a trial has been corrected by Parliament

FROM THE LESSON TO DRAW OF 60 NEW DEATHS

There are now 60 families in mourning in the Vaud State because the procedures put in place by the Authorities are flawed and they killed the seniors they were supposed to protect.

This is the worst score of all the French Swiss State.

There may be an explanation: the Authorities do not listen to the experts of Parliament

THE ALERT IS SENT TO THE COUNCIL OF STATE AND PARLIAMENT AND THEIR FAMILIES TO ANSWER TWO QUESTIONS:

These two questions show the danger that awaits all citizens who have a dispute with a member of an association of lawyers.

It is the danger established by the parliament expert that has not been corrected.

Each to answer the Q1 and Q2 questions put to the President of the Council of State of Fribourg

See : 200407DE_CE

Two Fribourg magistrates will also answer these two questions,

To be continued

Forced to recuse herself, Catherine Overney does not do so to remind that the Councilor of States, Philippe BAUER, has obtained from the TF that the judges cannot disobey to a Bar President, member of a criminal organization.

Philippe BAUER
Parliament Councillor
Put on the spot by a Fribourg Judge

This interdiction to disobey allows former Bar President, members of criminal organization, to commit economic crimes with full impunity.

The Court of Neuchâtel had ruled unlawful that a President of the Bar could prevent a witness of a false denunciation from testifying, as the Bar President was knowing that the President of the Courts could not disobey him, and consequently he could not he could not oppose this ban made by the Bar President

Philippe BAUER had obtained that the TF reversed the judgment by saying that it was up to the victim’s lawyer, to disobey the Bar President to avoid damage to the victim, rather that it is the President of the Court who has the right to disobey the Bar President in order to have the witness testify about the false denunciation

FOR INTRODUCTION :

Everyone has to read the following form:

200327DE_IG

and answer questions Q1 and Q2 on page 3, point 2.2.2

THEN DISCOVER C. OVERNEY’S STRATEGY :

Since she could not disobey the Bar President, she chose to make a professional mistake to be put on notice to take a position on questions Q1 and Q2.

To read : 200401DE_CO

This is not an "april poisson" !

It is up to everyone to appreciate his approach which shows that Philippe BAUER is a member of a criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament!

And also that this criminal organization is protected by Michael LAUBER who violates procedural safeguards with lies !

051217DP_GC

200327DE_IG

200401DE_CO

Did the Vaud Public Prosecutor contact the MPC Supervisory Authority in February 2020 ?

Michael LAUBER
Confederation
General Prosecutor

Did Michael Lauber violate procedural safeguards with lies only for FIFA case or also for other cases ?

Can a Prosecutor logically violate his oath only in one case ?

Who pays a prosecutor’s salary
and for what purpose ?

In February, General Prosecutor Eric COTTIER has to investigate violations of procedural safeguards with lies, where the MPC and the Bar association were involved.

He was aware that the MPC Supervisory Authority has to provide a response to Mr. Erni on the matter described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry. He knew that this case concerned the actions of Christian BETTEX, the President of the Bar association 051217DP_GC

He also knew that the MPC Supervisory Authority had not yet completed its investigation into the breach of procedural safeguards by Michael LAUBER.

How to explain that the MPC Supervisory Authority suddenly sent a response showing that it had not completed its investigation to Mr. Erni and that this response was never notified to Mr. Erni?

Was there an informal meeting, without Minutes, between the Public Ministries?

Who organized the sending of these registered letters that do not arrived ? There have been several letters. There is the example of the order of December 6, 2019, quoted by the General Staff of the Prosecutor Cottier, see Exhibit 200313DE_GC page 3, point 2 (still not found)

There is here, the letter of February 10 from the Supervisory Authority of the MPC, whose existence was first revealed on March 20?

See exhibit 200325DE_CC

PRICE TO BE PAID BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE VIOLATION OF PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS BY THOSE WHO HAVE TOO MUCH POWER :

Today the World is in danger by the risk of coronavirus resurgence. The global contamination is obviously coming from people who have too much power and who have violated security procedures.

If we want credible justice, we cannot tolerate a general Prosecutor violating his oath, just as we cannot tolerate people with too much power endangering citizens with coronavirus.

Prosecutors are paid to protect citizens, and not to destroy them by violating procedural safeguards with lies

Finding of 7 March 2020 :

The General Staff of the Prosecutor General Eric COTTIER makes the Prosecutor appear to be the accomplice of a fraud with a judicial order that can only be a fake Title.

See exhibit: 200207DE_EC

Eric COTTIER
Vaud General Prosecutor
slandered on March 7, 2020

13 March 2020:

Complaint is filed with the Vaud Parliament

200313DE_GC

See explanations point 2, page 3 of the complaint

The General Staff of Eric COTTIER claimed that a decision concerning Me Christian BETTEX was final and enforceable on 7 March 2020.

The General Prosecutor disavowed his General Staff by stating that the decision was not binding and final on 7 March 2020. It was still possible to appeal against the judicial order on March 7!!

See exhibit 200314DE_EC

The Prosecutor suggested that he was aware of the gross violation of procedural guarantees, but he refuses to give explanations.

The case is much more serious than we thought.

It could help to understand the blackmail done with false denunciation and death threats that were apparently mounted by magistrates against the victim of professional blackmail

The Parliament is informed of the position taken by the General Prosecutor which is for the moment not comprehensible, in view of his refusal to give explanations

See complaint addendum addressed to the Vaud Parliament

200318DE_GC

Observation :

The Prosecutor’s Silence on the violation of procedural guarantees is worrisome.

He proceeded like Michael Lauber. A lawyer, who is the subject of an investigation by the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Confederation, claims that these Prosecutors violate the guarantees of proceedings under pressure from members of Parliament.

C'This is very serious since Eric Cottier knows the methods of coercion used against a CEO to blackmail one of his directors. He knows how Me BETTEX censored Me Schaller who was not a member of the Bar Association

To be continued.

For one year the General Prosecutor will receive only 92% of his salary, that is an invitation made to him to continue to violate the guarantees of procedures and to lie to give benefits to third parties.

Michael LAUBER
General Prosecutor

Encouraged by Parliament to violate his Oath if not revoked

TJ du 4 mars

By reducing the Prosecutor’s salary by 8% for one year, instead of revoking it Parliament could show that the Value of the Oath of the magistrates who must render justice has no value.

If he does not dismiss the Prosecutor, Parliament gives a strong signal to the dissident lawyer who has undertaken to have a Federal Councillor shot down by saying that the most senior leaders of Swiss Authoroties no longer want to enforce the Federal Constitution

The advantages that an Attorney General can give to members of a criminal organization by lying with secret hearings are well above 8% of his salary, or CHF 24,000

We understand that a former Federal Judge, like Claude ROUILLER, made a false expertise to cover organized crime. Indeed, if the Prosecutors who protect him risk only 8% of their salary for one year, they can amply compensate this loss of salary with secret agreements made without Minutes! !

PrWe understand that a former Federal Judge, like Claude ROUILLER, made a false expertise to cover organized crime. Indeed, if the Prosecutors who protect him risk only 8% of their salary for one year, they can amply compensate this loss of salary with secret agreements without Minutes! :

171214MP_DE

Attention will also be given to the General Staff of Vaud general Prosecutor, and to the answers given by the Vaud Parliament:

200207DE_EC

On March 1st, the President of the Council of State discovered that a lawyer, unique witness of a false denunciation against his client, must disobey the President of the Bar in order to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution of his client .

Anne-Claude DEMIERRE
President of
Fribourg State Council

She knows that Fribourg judges are complicit in death threats against a lawyer client, victim of a false denunciation, but she does not know the pressure exerted by the Attorney General of the Confederation, Michael Lauber, who had to give explanations to the Supervisory Authority on this case.

To read :

200301DE_CE

+ annexes

200225DE_TC

200226DE_TC

The President of the Council of State discovered that no lawyer dared to disobey the President of the Bar following the threats of reprisal that are heard in a recording taken by a private detective.

She does not yet know that this case was brought before the Supervisory Authority of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Confederation with the argument that the Attorney General of the Confederation had failed to respect the fundamental rights that his duty of office required him to perform respect.

On the contrary, he would have grossly violated procedural guarantees to give benefits to law enforcement professionals.

She does not know that Attorney General, Eric COTTIER, is awaiting a response from this Supervisory Authority in the context of the criminal complaint filed against Jean-Benoît Meuwly and Sonia Bulliard Grosset.

Michael LAUBER
General Prosecutor
Of the confederation

Today, March 4, 2020, the Supervisory Authority of the Office of the Attorney General announced that the Attorney General had lied.

From now on, Attorney General Eric Cottier should be able to break the OMERTA on this case of fraud committed by the Bar Association with the protection of the Attorney General of the Confederation. The investigation of the criminal complaint could finally begin, without the pressure exerted by Michael Lauber, the Prosecutor.

200301DE_EC

The President of the Council of State, Anne-Claude DEMIERRE is alerted

See the letter:

200226DE_CE

Anne-Claude Demierre
Président
Fribourg State Council

Criminal complaint was filed

He was surprised that the Constitution allowed a President to prevent the filing of a criminal complaint against the President of a company that violated copyright.

This was the case described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry in which the President of the Bar, Philippe RICHARD, had forbidden Patrick Foetisch, President of ICSA, to be the subject of a criminal complaint.

TWO FRIBOURGEOIS JUDGES HAVE JUST RESPONDED IN THEIR OWN WAY:

he is Jean-Benoît Meuwly, see 200225DE_TC

and Sonia Bulliard Grosset, see 200226DE_TC

They judge their own recusal, they violate the right to be heard to give benefits to members of the Bar Association

they could be the responsible for death threats in a case of professional blackmail, involving Vaudois judges. They use these threats so that their victims don’t dare complain about the violation of procedural guarantees.

This is the case where the President of the Bar, Philippe Richard, had forbidden Patrick Foetisch to be the subject of a criminal complaint

A lawyer says that Switzerland needs a Maurice Bavaud who shoot a Federal Councillor to restore respect for the Values of the Constitution… an opinion from a law enforcement professional that is less and less surprising with the Crypto Case

Micheline Calmy-Rey questioned by the RTS on February 12 chooses to remain silent

Silence du 12.02.2020

Federal Councillors are not above the law !

They are sworn in. They cannot give benefits to members of secret societies by violating the Constitution.

Why did a lawyer say that Switzerland needs a Maurice BAVAUD who shoots a Federal Councillor ?

What is the relationship between the Federal Council and the Swiss Bar Association that provoked this lawyer’s reaction ?

Federal Councillors are expected not to allow a private company to rig machines to secretly monitor countries on behalf of third countries.

It is clear that Micheline Calmy-REY, who chose to remain silent, also helped Patrick Foetisch and his criminal organization to violate the Constitution in a filthy way.

If a lawyer claims that Federal Councillors violate the Constitution to serve the interests of a powerful criminal organization, the Crypto case gives a terrifying dimension to his remarks :

"We observe that the discrimination in the by-election to the Council of State of the Canton of Vaud, described below, is related to the censorship exercised by federal councillors alleged accomplices of this criminal organization”.

Their modus operandi is to impose the Law of Silence on organized crime.

It is time for the Federal Council to break the silence on the actions of members of this criminal organization who collaborate with foreign powers and the Swiss Federation of Lawyers.

Everyone must be wondering why the Crypto case is only made public today.

It should be noted that many lawyers complain about being threatened and censored when they want to defend the Values of the Constitution….

...the recordings made public by Edward Snowden and private detectives may explain the press’s choice to reveal the Crypto case today.

See TJ 19h30 12.02.2020

See TJ 19h30 14.02.2020

Explanations will be required from the Federal Council and the Swiss Federation of Lawyers on the actions of their members that violate the Constitution

To be continued

Sonia BUTERA
Grand Council
Vice President

Lawyer reported breach of procedural safeguards by Grand Council Office:

See exhibit 200130DE_GC

Grand Council Office does not take this into account

See exhibit: 200204SB_DE

The candidate of the Group on Ethics of Respect for the Swiss Constitutions recalls the rules of ethics that the people are entitled to expect from elected officials. He points out that the lawyer only did his work by pointing out that the Grand Council Office could not judge itself for its request for recusal.

See exhibit 200206DE_SB

The Deputy Marc Olivier Buffat reacts

1) Members of the Office of the Grand Council are not entitled to judge themselves for the application of their recusal

2) Members of the Grand Council Office do not have the right to decide that an appeal is not an appeal

On the recommendation of the lawyer an appeal is filed as well as a complaint to the Management Commission

See the appeal 200130DE_GC

See the vidéo of the session du January 28, 2020

What will BETTEX advise to do?

NEW APPEAL IS FILED

To read : 200125DE_GC

The Constitution does not allow the Grand Council Office to judge itself for the application of its recusal and the law on political rights does not allow it any more

The deputies should know it!

To be  continued

Me Patrick FOETISCH
Mentor of the Swiss Bâtonniers

Patrick FOETISCH is the prestigious member of a criminal organization. This organization does not hesitate to use false denunciation with professional blackmail as a record shows.

To discover how Sonia Bulliard Grosset, President of the Tribunal de la Broye, makes a denial of justice so that the lower right takes precedence over the higher right.

To discover the relations that bind the judges to the Bâtonniers which allows a judge to judge his own application for recusal:

200123DE_TC

After the climate emergency, there is the extreme legal emergency

Bank violates Constitutional Values

JUDGMENT :
“it is the higher right that must prevail!”

EXEMPLARY JUGMENT :

See Judgment (TJ 19h30 RTS / Monday January 13, 2020)

"One can act by breaking the law to defend a higher Right""

WELL DONE THE YOUNG ACTIVISTS
for having the courage to break the law to uphold the superior law that protects the Values of the Constitution.

The right must not be used to circumvent the Values of our Constitution.

 “The bank did not have the right to violate the Values of the Constitution on the pretext that the law allows it to do so”

These are the two key values that Denis ERNI, the candidate for the complementary election to the Council of State, will apply to enforce the Vaud Constitution.

He hopes that his appeal, to put an end to his discrimination for this election, will be treated with these two Values

Grand Council expert, hired by members of Parliament to avoid another Zug killing, would turn in his grave !

Béatrice Métraux
State Councillor
DIS Chief

Denis ERNI, the candidate for election to the Council of State, has sent to Béatrice MÉTRAUX the explanations of François de ROUGEMONT, the expert of the Grand Council, concerning the violation of procedural guarantees by her department

From now on, Ms Béatrice MÉTRAUX can no longer ignore how the Grand Council allows legal professionals to commit economic crime with impunity…. and with the help of his department!!

Discover here the explanations of the Grand Council expert, François de Rougemont :

191231DE_BM

191231DE_BM

2020

HAPPY NEW YEAR

Best Wishes to all the readers for a good Health

2019

THE YEAR 2019 IN REVIEW

CITIZENS BEGIN TO REALIZE THAT THEY CAN NO LONGER TRUST THEIR ELECTED PEOPLE TO ENFORCE FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS

The Ethics and Respect for the Constitution group presented its Candidate with flaws in its list related to the actions of the State Lawyer. It calls for the correction of irregularities in the preparation of elections so that the Vaud Constitution can be respected.

TJ du 19h30 du 23.12.2019

Vincent Duvoisin is made aware that the application of the law on political rights is not possible until the Grand Council has corrected the irregularities that led to this election. He received the copy of the letter below

To read :191223DE_GC

Today :

Women complain that the authorities do not respect the principle of equality guaranteed in the Constitution.

Young people complain that the authorities are not taking the necessary measures in the face of the climate emergency to preserve the quality of life, which is a fundamental right enshrined in the Constitution.

They are trying to change the codes for the election to the Council of State to be heard

The Grand Council has taken no corrective action to enforce the Values of the Constitution. On the contrary, lawyers from the state, such as Me Christian BETTEX, block respect for the fundamental rights of citizens enshrined in in the Vaud Constitution.

The Ethics and Respect for the Constitution group observes that to put an end to all these demands, it is enough to have elected members of the Council of State who enforce the Values of the Constitution.

This group presented a candidate who wants to enforce the Values of the Constitution and who can fulfill all the conditions laid down by the application of the law on political rights. This is possible only if he is not discriminated against by the irregularities which led to this election.

A recording, taken by a private detective, shows how state lawyers have the means to economically boycott candidates who demand respect for the Values of the Constitution by blackmailing them.

Candidats

191211DE_GC

191222DE_GC

191223DE_GC

The actions of Christian BETTEX, State lawyer, violate the Vaud Constitution. They disadvantage candidates who are victims of economic boycott organized by the Bar Association..

The President of the Grand Council  will have to ensure compliance with the Vaud Constitution

Yves RAVENEL
President of
the Grand Council

The Grand Council must ensure that candidates for election to the Council of State, victim of economic boycott by the Bar Association with the complicity of the State Lawyer, Me Christian BETTEX, have the means to conduct fairly their electoral campaign.

It will be up to the President of the Grand Council, Yves RAVENEL, to enforce the Values of the Constitution.

The group of respect for the Swiss Constitutions will support the candidacy of Denis ERNI with the list «Ethics and Respect for the Constitution».

To read the recourse  :

191211DE_GC

To be continued

If Pascal Broulis and Jacqueline de QUATTRO made the taxpayer pay their lawyer to deal with private matters, Pierre-Yves MAILLARD surpassed them.

191206_24H

The latter observed silence on an organized crime case, where he made the taxpayer pay the state lawyer to give benefits to members of his brotherhood.

Me Christian BETTEX
State Lawyer

The silence of Pierre-Yves MAILLARD on the violation of fundamental rights by the state lawyer, with this case of blackmail, must cause the postponement of the elections of the successor of Jacqueline de QUATTRO

Indeed, the victim of the blackmail wants to apply to succeed to Jacqueline de QUATTRO.

The President of the Council of State, Nuria GORRITE, is informed of the situation.

191210DE_NG

The victim shares the values of young people and Greens who fight for the quality of lifee.

If elected, the victim will defend the freedom of the press and the values of the Constitution.

An appeal will be filed with the Grand Council to put an end to these irregularities in the preparation of the elections

191206_24H

191210DE_NG

191021DE_NG

This is the question to be studied by Christian LEVRAT and the speakers of the assembly of the Socialist Party following the decrease of the PS in the federal elections. It is an issue that affects the integrity and credibility of party leaders!

See exhibit 191204DE_CL

Christian LEVRAT
President of PS
Swiss Socialist Party
Council of States Member

« How many times during the campaign, people have told us: you don’t talk about the Swiss, the little ones, the weak, the pensioners, the ones who are in pain and we have to thematize this ! »

Listen to the PS speakers at the TJ at 7.30 pm :

"The diagnosis of Barbara Lanthemann"

The best example is Pierre-Yves MAILLARD who does not want to talk about the content of the recording of an interview without a protocol, which he knows exists. This recording shows the violation of the rights of the weakest by a criminal organization.

A lawyer, who is under investigation by the MPC, claims that a former socialist federal judge is a member of this criminal organization.

It is not because a socialist federal judge grossly violates party values by enriching the richest with the law of the strongest, that party leaders should not talk about the rights of the weakest violated by the law of the strongest!

The speakers of the PS received the copy of the record without protocol, they must now act to restore confidence in the Socialist Party.

See exhibit 191204DE_CL

The new National Councillor Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, will check that the Federal Judges respect the guarantees of procedures by analyzing a case that concerns him directly. He will not be alone, other experts will also be able to give their opinion in order to have a fair justice for all.

Pierre-Yves MAILLARD
National Councillor

Pierre-Yves MAILLARD is witness to the existence of a recording of a session without protocol. This recording shows professional blackmail. Federal judges are involved.

He received a judicial order from the MPC that prevents him from discussing the content of this recording. As a stakeholder, he can verify whether there has been a violation of guarantees procedural.

As National Councillor, he will have to elect Federal Judges. He was asked to check whether the procedural guarantees had been respected in this case in which he was involved.

See exhibit 191127DE_PM

Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, President of the Swiss Trade Union Association, will be able to show what it means to fight against the LAW OF THE STRONGEST, with this mission based on transparency that he promotes as VALUE

To be continued !

An investigation into the malfunctions of his staff is opened

RTS TJ 19h30 of 19.11.19

Jacqueline de Quattro
Councillor of Vaud State

These two Councillors of State, who were elected to the Federal Parliament, have to explain the relationship between the Council of State and the Bar Association and the Courts 

They must above all take remedial and corrective actions to repair the damage caused by their General Staff with judicial magistrates who are not independent of the Authorities.

Transparency is demanded from these elected officials, whose General Staff allow and help professionals of the Law to commit economic crime with impunity.

See letter 191120DE_JQ

191120DE_JQ

TJ 19h30

A question from a group of lawyers who volunteer to defend the Values of Life!

See le Temps du 18.07.19

Among them is the former chairman of the bar, Antonella Cereghetti, but there is also a black sheep. It is the lawyer of the State who destroys the Values of Life by being financed by the State!

See 191113DE_AC

Antonella Cereghetti
First woman of the Canton of Vaud
Chairman of the bar

Antonella Cereghetti was criticized for her Progressive Values when she was elected Vice President of the Bar

See 24 H du 21 mars 2014

She replied that :

«I think that the position of Chairman of the bar is beyond political divisions. We do not seek this position for political reasons»

Let us hope that she has remained faithful to her Values and that she will require from his colleague, Me Christian BETTEX, lawyer of the State, that he will repair the damage that he created by protecting criminals with a false denunciation !

It is all the more important that he was paid by the State, that is by our taxes, to give advantages to the members of his brotherhood!

See 191113DE_AC

A copy of the record is sent to the President of the Supervisory Authority of the MPC, a survivor of the Zug Carnage Parliamente

See exhibit 191106DE_HU

Hanspeter USTER
Chairman of the MPC Supervisory Authority

A survivor of the Carnage of the 14 elected officials, who has all the elements to act to end the violation of fundamental rights with the law of silence exercised by the MPC

These lawyers denounce the violation of the respect of the fundamental rights of the Swiss people by members of a criminal organization infiltrated in Parliament.

One of the lawyers explains that to get elected the Federal Judges are forced to serve the members of this criminal organization that infiltrated Parliament

See exhibit 191106DE_HU

The advantages given by Philippe BAUER to his colleagues prompted one of the lawyers to break the Law of Silence on the Carnage of these 14 elected officials of the Parliament of Zug.

See exhibit 101113DE_GC

It should be noted that Philippe BAUER was invited on December 8, 2010 to attend a conference on his actions. It was finally this other lawyer, who followed the debate, who revealed the existence of this criminal organization infiltrated into Parliament.

What will Michael LAUBER do ?

See exhibit 191106DE_HU

This lawyer explains that the Federal Judges, who are elected and paid by Parliament, are forced to return the favor to the elected ones who choose them! His analysis that the Zug killing was caused by federal judges shows a major dysfunction of the judicial system.

Question :

Did the MPC lie in his determinations sent to the MPC Surveillance Authority on this blackmail case to cover up organized crime?

Claude ROUILLER
Former President of the TF prevents the victim’s lawyer from ruling on his report with the support of Federal Judges

Behind the scenes, he confirmed that the dismissal with this professional blackmail was illegal!!!

Claude ROUILLER failed to mention in his report the existence of this professional blackmail!

Me Christian BETTEX, lawyer of the State, with the approval of Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, asked federal judges to prevent Me Schaller to be able to represent his client on the ROUILLER report, while Me Christian BETTEX was a private stakeholder!

191021DE_NG

The MPC was aware of this recording and his analysis made by a lawyer. The latter said that justice was infiltrated by a criminal organization.

The MPC opened an investigation to put under surveillance this lawyer who denounced the violation of fundamental rights by a criminal organization !

THE DETERMINATIONS OF THE MPC ADDRESSED TO THE SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY ON THIS CASE OF BLACKMAIL AND ECONOMIC BOYCOTT ORGANISED BY LAW PROFESSIONALS

Apparently the MPC is using the absence of protocol of the blackmail session to deny its existence.

191030DE_SW

The recording sent to the MPC Supervisory Authority attests to the existence of this blackmail session!

The right to be able to consult the MPC’s determinations and to be able to pronounce on them was required by the victim of the blackmail

191030DE_SW

191030DE_SW

191021DE_NG

Nuria GORRITE has just received her free copy of the recording of an interview, not protocoled, in the possession of Doris LEUTHARD.

Nuria GORRITE
President of the Council of vaud State

To discover the explanations of the letter accompanying the copy of the recording

191021DE_NG

An official document, issued by the Public Ministry of the Confederation, shows that Nuria GORRITE would not have been aware of the recording of the professional blackmail session in which Pierre-YVES MAILLARD is involved.

It seems clear that young women elected to the federal Parliament will no longer allow «Pierre-Yves MAILLARD» to use state lawyers to violate the rights of the weakest.

By discovering the actions of his predecessor, Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, thanks to the copy of this recording made public, Nuria GORRITE now knows the reasons why Pierre-Yves MAILLARD used the State Attorney to prevent Me Schaller from representing his client.

It is up to her, as President of the Council of State, to show that she does not tolerate that public funds were used by her predecessor to give advantages to the brotherhood of the state lawyer.

Like Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, she knows that blackmail to dismiss, used to economically boycott a citizen and silence him, is a weapon of war.

She knows that citizens who do not give in to blackmail will no longer be able to feed their families.

She knows that Pierre-Yves MAILLARD used a perverse and cowardly method of war to cover state crime!.

This recording allowed her to discover the true face of Pierre-Yves MAILLARD..

Federal Prosecutor Jacques RAYROUD intervened to promote the election of candidates for Parliament who are ready to elect federal judges and prosecutors who are working against the benefits of the people

Jacques RAYROUD
Federal Prosecutor
Staff Member of
Michael LAUBER

Jacques RAYROUD has hidden from the people the existence of an investigation and a recording which shows that he has given overriding advantages to candidates for election to parliament!

These candidates have appealed to federal judges to provide benefits to members of organized crime fraternities. They have received these benefits. If these candidates are elected, they will have to elect our future federal judges and prosecutors.

They will have to return the favor to Jacques RAYROUD and the federal judges who helped them to cover organized crime.

The Party Presidents received a copy of the recording of a meeting without protocol in the possession of Doris LEUTHARD. They know how Jacques RAYROUD gave advantages to candidates of their party by not having made public this recording and the investigation he made on it.

Watch the video showing the information broadcast by Philippe BAUER with his PLR campaign committee at the TSR on the 19.30 news of 14.10.2019 :

Video commented by Pierre NEBEL

Everyone can check that voters have not received a CD-ROM containing the recording of the meeting without protocol in the possession of Doris LEUTHARD. The video clearly shows that it is only a sandwich with ham.

Everyone can verify that it is not explained in any way that Philippe BAUER works against the people, with the help of federal judges, by allowing his brotherhood to prevent witnesses of crimes committed by law professional from testifying .

See letter addressed to the President of the Party

Letter : 191012DE_PG

He’s not the only one.

By controlling the information disseminated by Pierre-Yves MAILLARD and his PS campaign committee :

Everyone can check that Pierre-Yves Maillard did not distribute the copy of this recording in the possession of Doris LEUTHARD, whose existence he knew well.

Anyone can verify that Pierre-Yves MAILLARD has hidden from the voters that he was using the State lawyer, with the help of federal judges, to hide the existence of the content of this recording to the people.

See letter addressed to the President of the Party

Letter :191014DE_CL

The Presidents of the Parties concerned must make public the content of this recording with the actions of these candidates who will have to elect our future judges and federal prosecutors.

They must organize a public debate with them on their actions.

Logically, they should exclude from their party those candidates who betray voters.

191009DE_KK

191012DE_PG

191014DE_CL

Like France, Switzerland also has a Wolf in the Gate. The Swiss Wolf is not called Michael HARPON, but Jacques RAYROUD.

Michael HARPON, the Wolf in the Gate of Christophe CASTANER

Our Minister of Justice has been directly informed.

Swiss Justice Minister
Karin Keller-Sutter

Jacques RAYROUD, the Wolf in the Gate of
Karin Keller-Sutter

This magistrate is a member of the MPC staff. By hiding and censoring the content of this recording, he gives advantages to candidates for the federal election to Parliament who should not be elected for their hidden criminal activities.

According to a lawyer, the contents of this recording show the actions of a powerful criminal organization that is infiltrated at the top of the State.

Several candidates for Parliament election would work for this criminal organization.

The Presidents of the most concerned political parties are informed that there is a Wolf in the Gate

This Wolf is not called Michael HARPON, but Jacques RAYROUD.

The people have the right to know the content of this recording which shows that Jacques RAYROUD gives advantages to members of a criminal organization.

Karin Keller-Suter has received a copy of this recording.

See part :191009DE_KK

On Friday 27 September, when the Public Security Forces declared that the demonstration was illegal, Jacques Dubochet sat in the middle of Rhodanie Avenue in Lasuanne to be heard.

See TJ 19h30,27.09.2019

Un Prix NOBEL
Jacques Dubochet
Nobel Prize Winning
donne l'exemple en résistant

Il n’a pas été emporté dans une brouette !

Les parlementaires commencent à réaliser qu’il y a un dysfonctionnement systémique de la justice avec l’élection du Procureur par le Parlement.

Le candidat au poste de Procureur doit charmer le lobby de la justice au Parlement pour se faire élire. Il n’hésitera pas à violer les droits du peuple si le lobby de la justice du Parlement le lui demande.

Il n’y a pas beaucoup de candidats qui veulent ce poste, parce qu’il est sous l’influence du lobby de la justice au Parlement.

Voir réélection TJ 19h30 du 25 septembre

Le député Christian Lüscher ne voit pas de fautes graves. Il est surtout conscient qu’il est difficile de trouver des candidats qui veulent charmer le lobby judiciaire du Parlement !

Que fait-il du respect des droits fondamentaux du peuple ?

Voir réélection TJ 19h30 du 25 septembre

Que va-t-il dire pour le comportement de Jacques RAYROUD qui donne des avantages à des candidats au Parlement complices de crimes organisés en cachant astucieusement les faits.

voir 190920DE_HU

The federal election campaign is badly damaged by a decision of the Deputy Attorney General of the Confederation, Jacques Rayroud, notified on 18 September

To read: 190923DE_MC

Marina CAROBBIO
Swiss Parliament
President

This decision makes it possible to hide from voters that candidates for election to Parliament, accomplices of economic crime, are the subject of criminal complaints that were blocked at the MPC

The case has been referred to the supervisory Authority of the MPC

In its decision, notified on 18 September 2019, Jacques RAYROUD dixit(190913MP_DE) :

« In the present case, the complainant’s criticisms are not justified and have no criminal relevance that would justify the initiation of a criminal investigation »

He does not even quote the number of the criminal complaint of 25 November 2017 which showed justified reproaches with the violation of access to independent tribunals, see 171214MP_DE

Everyone can check that he knows that at the basis of this complaint, there were witnesses who filed a request for a parliamentary inquiry saying (voir : 051217DP_GC)

« we have witnessed practices that are chilling… they violate the European Convention on Human Rights to which Switzerland has acceded »

Jacques Rayroud knows moreover that at the origin of this request for parliamentary investigation, there is a false denunciation (it is criminal) that cannot be denied according to Me Christian Bettex, State Attorney ! (voir 190920DE_HU)

In short, Michael LAUBER must absolutely call these witnesses to show that he is able to enforce the Constitution in the face of these practices that make people tremble, and of this misleading and outrageous decision of September 18, taken by Jacques Rayroud, a member of his staff

Michael LAUBER must inform the voters on these facts reproached to candidates for election to Parliament, accomplices of economic crime

051217DP_GC

171214MP_DE

190913MP_DE

190923DE_MC

190920DE_HU

Who knew that the Federal Authorities did not plan to elect and fund Federal Judges to enforce the Federal Constitution? …Who knew their election violated the separation of powers? ... Who knew they were chosen by influential people from political parties to do influence peddling?

View comments from the author of this initiative that was submitted at the end of August 2019.

Initiative comments

The President of the Vaudois Council of State, Nuria GORRITE, will have to take into account the 128,000 signatures of this initiative to explain the refusal of the Council of State to allow Me Rudolf SCHALLER to represent his client on a disputed expertise, mandated by the State.

190917DE_NG

Nuria GORRITE
Vaud Council of State
President

The submission of the federal initiative on the election of federal judges by lot confirms the violation of the separation of powers with the current method of selecting federal judges. The content of this initiative explains: "why the dissenting lawyer said that a Professor of Law, who undertakes to respect the Federal Constitution, cannot become a federal judge"".

Me Christian BETTEX, Vaud State lawyer, had announced that the Federal Court would violate the right to Me Rudolf SCHALLER to represent Dr D. Erni on the expertise made by Me Claude ROUILLER.

Me Claude ROUILLER is a former federal judge, Professor of Law, mandated by the State of Vaud to make an expertise that was challenged for its falsehood by independent law professionals.

Today, Nuria GORRITE, President of the Vaudois Council of State, must give explanations on this grime violation of the procedural guarantees by the Vaud Council of State.

190917DE_CE

Everyone can appreciate the scope of this initiative, which shows that federal judges cannot be trusted with such a systemic dysfunction of the judiciary.

It is above all for the few Federal Judges, who do not agree to have to return the favor to the Initiates of Parliament, to show that they exist by supporting this initiative.

This initiative must allow the Federal Judges, defenders of the Values of our democracy, to show that they exist and that they no longer tolerate the constraint of the corrupt elites.

Dissident lawyer raised the alert on the pressure exerted by Parliament’s Initiates on judges. 

It is now up to the Federal Judges with Integrity to show that they exist by supporting this initiative and denouncing the abuses of authority linked to the violation of the separation of powers and the constraint exercised by the Initiates of Parliament.

initiative

190917DE_NG

190917DE_CE

Michael LAUBER confirmed that he was the author of Berne’s investigation into the dissident lawyer. He would be the one who was interested in the recordings hidden from the public held by this lawyer, including the one heard by Doris LEUTHARD

E. MOSER, of the State judiciary Service, demands payment of fraudulent Securities without delay, only after Pierre-Yves MAILLARD has resigned from the Council of State

190904CE_DE

Pierre-Yves MAILLARD
Swiss Trade Union Association President

Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, as President of the Vaudois Council of State, knew of the existence of these recordings hidden from the people! …. He knew that Michael LAUBER had proof that the President of the Council of State gave advantages to the members of the brotherhood of lawyers by turning a blind eye on these Securities obtained fraudulently with the intervention of the State lawyer!

To everyone to appreciate that Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, as State Councillor, cannot give advantages to the rich by hiding it from the Public, and as President of the USS publicly become the defender of the weakest by demanding wage increases.

TJ News of 6.09.2019

Pierre-Yves MAILLARD must explain himself publicly on this double game!

See Letter 190911DE_CE

Michael LAUBER knows that by violating the procedural guarantees, he allows E. MOSER to claim the payment of fraudulent Securities obtained with the intervention of the "OAV".

Michael LAUBER must explain himself on this investigation he is doing on this dissident lawyer who holds recordings hidden from the public and he must act without delay to avoid further damage !

See Letter 190911DE_ML

190904CE_DE

TJ 190906

190911DE_CE

190911DE_ML

Christophe GUERRY, Vaudois official, grants 30 days to Michael LAUBER to break the Law of Silence and repair the damage caused with the LAUBER method

190830DE_JG

Michael LAUBER
The Prosecutor with the method supported by those who practice Abuse of Authority

Victims of fraud with fraudulent Securities issued by Magistrates are treated arbitrarily by the State.

C. Guerry understood the functioning of the LAUBER method. He understood that it allows corrupt elites to issue these Securities.

To avoid being responsible for imminent damage, C. Guerry gives 30 days to Michael LAUBER to break the silence and compensate the damage caused with his famous Lauber method.

Michael LAUBER was put on notice to break the Law of Silence.

The ball is now in his court:

190830DE_ML

190830DE_JG

190830DE_ML

190827DE_JG

An example of the hidden face of the iceberg is sent to the President of the Judicial Commission and two National Councillors

Jean-Paul GSCHWIND
Judiciary Commission
President

TV News Summary

TJ 19h30 27.08.2019

It is up to everyone to take a look at one of the examples of the hidden side of the Iceberg, where Michael LAUBER and his staff do not act to advantage a party by blocking files without responding to letters

Even if they are given 10 days’ notice to respond, they don’t do it. This method is used to remove exhibits for evidence …..

……to follow.

They don’t even acknowledge receipt of files sent by the Surveillance Authority !

190408HU_DE

190804DE_SW

190807CC_DE

Thanks to the Surveillance Authority for issuing the alert !

MThanks to the members of the Judicial Commission for demanding explanations so that our institutions remain credible

Our people need to be able to trust Parliament and have a Prosecutor worthy of our Constitution

SUMMER BREAK

Next update August 28, 2019 on Michael LAUBER’s counterattack

Michael LAUBER organizes the response on all fronts.

Info payante

SUMMER BREAK

FIFA IS NOT THE ONLY PROBLEM OF THE PROSECUTOR OF CONFEDERATION

How will Prosecutor Michael LAUBER justify the advantages he has given Me Patrick Foetish, Me Philippe BAUER, etc., by robbing their victims ?

IIt is also time for him to break the silence on the methods he applied in other cases than FIFA’s....

See RTS comments of Monday July 1st and Thursday 4 th, 2019

Coming soon on this site: Treatment of cases other than FIFA.

National Councillors wonder if the Confederation needs a Federal Prosecutor.

However, the parliamentarians, who deified Michael LAUBER to get him elected, thought they had found a communicator above the fray who could impose the Law of Silence on constitutional violations by corrupt elites

Among them is the Geneva lawyer Carlo Sommaruga

See 20 Minutes Newspaper Article of June 23 rd, 2019

Carlo SOMMARUGA
Genevan Lawyer
National Councilllor

Carlo Sommaruga has the chance to live in the Canton of Geneva, one of the only Cantons where the Prosecutor General is elected by the peoplee

Carlo Sommaruga knows that the independence of the General Prosecutor of Geneva allows him to investigate a Minister of Justice, like Pierre MAUDET, without having to organize hearings without protocols, even if it bothers some elected officials that a General Prosecutor plays the transparency and the respect of the Values of his voters.

While Michael LAUBER is a boomerang launched by Parliament who is coming back at him at great speed

The project of the launch of an initiative for a Law for the supervision of oaths of elected officials and magistrates by the people with curative measure would make it possible to remedy this scandal

See project : LSSEMP_19

The Federal Prosecutor chosen and elected by Parliament appears to be a pure product of corrupt elites.

The income for Life of young politicians is described as a golden Parachute that the corrupt elites grant to the magistrates so that they can make influence peddling with impunity : This is also the last lesson given by the Minister of Justice who is Pierre MAUDET which circulates on social networks

See 20 Minutes Newspaper Article of June 27th, 2019

VSee also 20 Minutes Newspaper Article of June 29th , 2019

THE PEOPLE WANT TO BE ABLE TO HOLD THEIR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES AND MAGISTRATES TO ACCOUNT AND THEY WANT TO ABOLISH PRIVILEGES

Earlier this year, the editor of IROmagazine had given this key message on social networks :

"We are the ones who choose our elected representatives and we never ask them to account ! (see his message and video on youtube)

Watch also his video which shows that seniors and young people can no longer trust their elected representatives and magistrates

Birthday gift for Mrs Rosenstiel’s 95th birthday

More and more petitions to uphold the Constitution 

To be signed here the petition to study the abuse of authority suffered by the victims 1982 to 2019

Sign here : http://chng.it/TXzcGCJm5D

Law professionals begin to react

INNOCENCE PROJECT:It is Professor André KUHN and lawyer Gugliemo Palumbo who will fight against the miscarriage of justice.

See Michèle Herzog Journalist Blog

REMOVAL OF THE HEAD OF THE DYSFUNCTIONAL JUSTICE PROJECT : National Councillors, including lawyer Carlo Sommaruga, suggest a shock measure to put an end to this systemic dysfunction of the Swiss Authorities :

They wonder if Switzerland needs a Federal Prosecutor !

TO HIRE A "Maurice BAVAUD " PROJECT: This observation that “the position of Federal Prosecutor elected by Parliament is a source of justice dysfunction” supports another lawyer’ comments, the dissident lawyer. He said in 2016, that words were no longer useful and that Switzerland needed to have a Maurice BAVAUD who shot down a Federal Councillor to obtain that the Federal Authorities enforce the Values of the Constitutionn

Every citizen understands that if the Federal Prosecutor organizes hearings without protocols to investigate complaints, then one cannot know the thousands of victims, without resources, robbed by the State and its magistrates. Everyone understands that it is necessary to abolish income for Life to these magistrates

Today, National Councillors, including Carlo SOMMARUGA, have finally explained why the dissident lawyer said that “words are no longer useful” and that a strike against the Authorities is needed.

National women’s strike on June 14 th has also confirms the dissident lawyer comments !

20minutes du 23 juin 2019

20minutes du 27 juin 2019

20minutes du 29 juin 2019

message

Cadeau

blog de MH

Pétition

IS HE BERN’S STRANGER WHO ASKED A POLICE INSPECTOR TO GET HIM THE ADDRESS OF A WHISTLE-BLOWER WITHOUT WANTING TO MAKE HIMSELF KNOWN? 

In the frame of FIFA file, Thierry Clémence says that a 25-page report shows that the methods of investigation of Prosecutor Michael LAUBER violate the rules, they are not legal !

To listen to TJ 19h30 of 18.06.09

What about the other files besides FIFA ?

In 2016, a Fribourg police inspector was sent to investigate a whistle-blower, the dissident lawyer. The latter had recordings showing influence peddling involving Magistrates. This lawyer said that Switzerland needed a Maurice BAVAUD to put an end to the dysfunctions of justice

"Le Confédéré remarquable"
Dissident Lawyer
Whistle-Blower

This dissident lawyer heard the hidden recording that Doris LEUTHARD heard…..

....he then spoke of the existence of a criminal organization behind this case !

Michael LAUBER may have good reasons for wanting to impose the Law of Silence to this dissident lawyer!

WHY DIDN’T THE PRESS MENTION IT?

Does Michael LAUBER’s 25-page report on illegal investigative methods describe this process ?

Is Michael LAUBER the famous stranger of Bern who would have helped Foetisch escape justice by imposing the Law of Silence with illegal methods of investigation ?

WHEN THE REALITY EXCEEDS THE FICTION

Do these 25 pages of the report on Michael LAUBER describe the methods of illegal investigation that led the dissident lawyer to say in April 2016, quote :

« Je vous mets en garde qu’ils vont vous censurer et essayer par tous les moyens de vous anéantir. J’ai appartenu à leur milieu et vous n’avez aucune idée des moyens qu’ils peuvent utiliser »

See exhibit 161003DE_IG

SERIOUSNESS OF THE ALERT ISSUED BY THE DISSIDENT LAWYER

Following the discovery of the existence of these methods of illegal and secret investigations applied by the General Prosecutor of the Confederation, everyone is invited to reread on this site the facts revealed by the dissident Lawyer, for example:

"Read below the comments dated 31.01.18 on the methods of investigation of the prosecutor Jean Treccani which relates to a secret hearing dated 15 July 1999"

"Read also below the comment dated 24.01.18 which explained that a letter dated 18 January 1996, rejected by the Judge of Montmollin, allowed to explain the murder of Pierre PENEL »

etc.

WHO IS MICHAEL LAUBER WORKING FOR ?

If Michael LAUBER is the stranger from Bern who mandated a Fribourg police inspector, then we can understand why the dissident lawyer took enormous precautions to remain anonymous. He must consider himself in danger of death as a swiss whistle-blower !

ABOUT THE PROOF OF THE EXISTENCE OF THE FRIBOURG POLICE INSPECTOR?

It was proposed to the President of the Tribunal Sonia Bulliard Grosset to reveal the name of the inspector. There are e-mail exchanges in security abroad that attest its existence,... for those who would doubt its existence

But nobody knows what’s going on in Bern. It may be a secret file...and empty, based on a hearing without protocol !

TJ 19h30-01

161003DE_IG

170919DE_TB

The Federal Court agrees with litigants who no longer trust the General Prosecutor of the Confederation

To listen to TJ 19h30 of 18.06.09

Rouven GUEISSAZ
Journalist
RTS Bern correspondent

Journalist Rouven GUEISSAZ explains that the General Prosecutor is fully wrong both on the content and on the process

To listen to interview of R. GUEISSAZ of TJ 19h30 of 18.06.09

The Justice Commission was criticized for having chosen candidates for their qualities as communicator, while the credibility of justice depends on the Candidate’s ability to uphold the Values of the Constitution

It was above all criticized that the Justice Commission had proposed only its preferred candidate for its election by Parliament. It was a vitiated election, where parliamentarians had not had the choice of several candidates

See Denis MASMEJAN Paper
Newspaper le Temps of September 26th, 2011

Fortunately, the Supervisory Authority of the Federal Prosecutor’s Office sounded the alarm

Corrective actions to be considered

The apolitical elites want the General Prosecutor to be chosen by an independent commission of Parliament composed of apolitical elites. They want his election to be made by the people.

The project of launching an initiative for “THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES,would also limit the risks of such a scandal.

See project : LSSEMP_19

TJ 19h30-01

TJ 19h30-02

le Temps

LSSEMP_19

The General Manager of UBS (CEO) has been instructed to take measures to ensure the security of the assets of his clients, following that the Public Prosecutor of the Confederation causes damage to UBS clients by violating procedural guarantees

See exhibit 190612DE_SE

Sergio Ermotti
UBS CEO

Michael LAUBER is not Bradley BIRKENFELD, but Sergio ERMOTTI should immediately understand that it is unacceptable that a General Prosecutor of the Confederation does not process criminal complaints on time in order that the Prosecution Office can request  payment of fraudulent executory Title.

It is not necessary to have done studies to know that if a General Prosecutor of the Confederation does not process on time the criminal complaint he receives, then criminal organizations have the door open to commit crimes with full impunity by using fraudulent executory TITLE.

We saw Wednesday, June 5, see below, that if Bertrand TSCHANZ receives the order to make a seizure for a executory Title obtained fraudulently, he says he is obliged to obey even if he knows that the Title is contested with a criminal complaint filed against a criminal organization.

We have seen that if the General Prosecutor of the Confederation, who received the criminal complaint, applies the Law of Silence, then the suspensive effect is masked by the Law of Silence.

UBS employee reactions

It’s up to everyone to discover their reaction

See Exhibit 190528SE_DE

Requirement to respect the rules of ethics and values of the Constitution

Sergio ERMOTTI has the power to enforce the Values of the Constitution. It is up to him to show that UBS refuses to use its clients' assets to finance executive Title obtained fraudulently by a criminal organization.

See exhibit 190612DE_SE

He has the proof given by the supervisory Autority of the Public Ministry of the Confederation that the General Prosecutor of the Confederation received the complaint.

See exhibit :190408CC_DE

By this evidence, he cannot ignore that Michael LAUBER violates the guarantees of proceedings as in the FIFA case by imposing the Law of Silence on the existence of this criminal complaint and its scope.

190528SE_DE

190612DE_SE

190408CC_DE

Lawyer Grégoire MANGEAT quotes another case explaining the seriousness of the breach of procedural rules: he explains how the entire balance of justice is broken if the  General Prosecutor does not respect the rules of procedures.

To listen to his interview in the TV show “Mise au point”of 19 May 2019, which starts at the minute 5

RTS Interview of 19.05.2019

Genevan Lawyer
Grégoire MANGEAT

In another case, Estavayer-le-lac Prosecution office chief, Bertrand TSCHANZ, says he is forced to violate the rights of citizens following the violation of the rules of procedure made by the General Prosecutor of Confederation.

See exhibit 190527BT_DE

Bertrand TSCHANZ explains that he does not have the power of the General Prosecutor of Confederation.

Even if he knows that a criminal organization exerts coercion on a citizen by using the prosecution office to seize with a document contested by a criminal complaint, its action depends on the behavior of the General Prosecutor of the Confederation.

In this case, Bertrand TSCHANZ knows that the General Prosecutor violates the rules of procedure by applying the law of silence on this complaint against criminal organization.

He knows that a criminal complaint gives right to a suspensive effect, but in case where the General Prosecutor does not make a protocol, the suspensive effect is masked by the law of silence.

Bertrand TSCHANZ can only explain that he is forced to make the seizure, knowing that the victims can do nothing against a General Prosecutor of Confederation who holds secret hearings rather than hearing in full transparency, and who applies the law of silence on the letters addressed to him.

Like Grégoire MANGEAT, he can only observe that the violation of the rules of procedure by the General Prosecutor of the Confederation discredits the entire Swiss justice system.

Everyone will observe that there is an inconsistency when Bertrand Tschanz says that the judgment would be dated October 4, 2018 and that it is only in May 2019 that he makes the seizure.

One may wonder if Michael LAUBER had an interview without minutes with those who ask to make the seizure!

Bertrand TSCHANZ was asked to provide answers to identify those who force him to make this seizure.

See exhibit 190521DE_BT

Everyone will observe the difficulty in obtaining the information.

See Exhibit : 190527BT_DE

To be followed soon on this page !

Interview

190527BT_DE

190521DE_BT

The charm operation of the Prosecutor Michael LAUBER gives him the confidence of the Parliament Management Committees, with the exception of one of the National Councillor: Valérie PILLER CARRARD

To listen to the 7.30 pm TJ interview

Valérie Piller CARRARD
National Councillor
Supervisory Committee Member

WHAT MORE DOES SHE KNOW TO SAY THAT TRUST IS BROKEN?

See exhibit 190529DE_VP

The Prosecutor’s charm operation is not sufficient for the Justice supervision committee, who postpones the election

To listen to the 7.30 pm TJ interview

Here is the Jocker

In a case of crimes committed by members of lawyers' brotherhoods, the National Councillor knows that the Prosecutor LAUBER with his Operating Committee uses the pretext of establishing competences to postpone all instruction within a reasonable times

See exhibit 190529DE_VP

Moreover, in the context of this case of economic crime, she knows that Me François de ROUGEMONT, who ruled on a request for a parliamentary investigation concerning the dysfunctions of the justice, explained that in order to limit abuse of authority by the Prosecutors, they had to record the proceedings of the audition. This has already been done once by a magistrate :

See page 8 point D5 of exhibit 18030DE_VP

Trust in justice cannot be based on the charm of a General Prosecutor but on facts.

Thanks to Hanspeter USTER, President of the Supervisory Authority of the Public Ministry of the Confederation, for requesting that the General Prosecutor do not apply arbitrary justice. He is aware of the request for a parliamentary inquiry that describes the dysfunctions of the justice system with the recommendations of Mr. De ROUGEMONT.

The requirement for a Minutes of Proceedings, or even the recording of all court proceedings, is like the requirement to turn on the headlights when driving at night, everything must be visible to ensure credible justice!

We request from Valérie PILLER CARRARD that she informs the members of the supervisory Committee of the documents she has in hand with the conclusions of Me de ROUGEMONT

interview_1

190529DE_VP

interview_2

181105DE_VP

18030DE_VP

The interview of one of the hostage takers, Me Philippe BAUER, by the RTS raises questions about the independence and neutrality of the RTS.

Pierre CHIFFELLE, lawyer
defender of the hostages,
and defender of the Values
of the Swiss Constitution

See interview of May 12th at the TJ of 7PM30

As Pierre CHIFFELLE explains well in the above interview, Swiss citizens were deprived of the right to vote on two distinct objects, which were independent

They were being cleverly taken as hostage by parliamentarians who wanted to force them to accept their solution, when there were other constitutional solutions

The RTS also interviews one of the hostage takers, former President of the Bar, Philippe BAUER, who uses his mandate as National Councillor and his Title of Lawyer, to influence the vote.

On this website of www.swisstribune.org, it was reminded that the publicity, made by Philippe BAUER for the advantages he could give to third parties, as a former President of the Bar with his mandate of National Councillor, had shocked a High School Student, but also several journalists. See comments below dated 03.04.19.

See also the letter addressed to Philippe BAUER, to which he never answered. Exhibit: 190403DE_PB

Against all understanding, the RTS - aware of these abuses of authority made by Me Philippe BAUER - questions him about this hostage taking of citizens by parliamentarians.

Not only does Philippe BAUER not hide that he is one of the authors of this hostage-taking, but he points out, presented as a lawyer and National Councillor, that it is enough to "change the rules" to put an end to the rights of hostages to be able to decide on two independent objects so that the vote becomes legal.

It was a very good publicity of the RTS made to Philippe BAUER among citizens who are looking for a lawyer, unethical, who showed that he does not hesitate to use his title as a lawyer, his relations and his power of an elected official to violate the Constitution with full impunity.

Ethically, in any case, the RTS is clearly violating its concession with his duty to inform the public in accordance with the respect of the values of our Constitution.

His role is not to advertise for a lawyer, former President of the Bar, who shows that his role as a member of Parliament allows him to violate the rights of citizens and to give benefits to members of brotherhoods involved in organized crime as attested by the exhibit : 190403DE_PB.

It should be stressed that National Councillor Philippe BAUER could not abuse his power if the parliamentary surveillance commission were not neutralized by professionals of the law who violate the separation of powers.

This is all the more serious since all parliamentarians had received a legal notice of the Federal Office of Justice warning them about the respect of the rights of citizens to be able to speak freely on independent matters

See interview of May 12th at the TJ of 7PM30

Hence the importance of the project of launching an initiative for “THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES"

See Project: LSSEMP_19

interview

190403DE_PB

LSSEMP_19

Prerequisite to be known
In 2016, a dissident lawyer explained that in order to cover organized crime, the country’s top authorities neutralized surveillance and information systems

IN THIS GIVEN CONTEXT A TELEVISION BROADCAST OF “INFRAROUGE SERIAL” SHOCKED SWISS CITIZENS BY IMPOSING THE LAW OF SILENCE TO WHISTLEBLOWERS OF SWISS SCANDALS:

In particular, whistleblowers dealing with Swiss scandals, including the FIFA case, were not allowed to speak at the TSR

Observation
Those who watched the “infrarouge” broadcast on Wednesday, May 8, were very disappointed that the presenter of the show, Alexis FAVRE, did not invite the whistleblowers, awarded in Strasbourg to show the malfunctions of the Swiss authorities, to address the public on the whistleblowers issue.

Among them were Jasmine MOTARJEMI (Nestlé case) and Rui PINTO (FIFA case)

See Michèle Herzog Blog

The explanation of this violation of the public’s right to be informed has already been given by the dissident lawyer: Swiss journalists are threatened with economic death if they do not apply the LAW OF SILENCE on these scandals

The journalists of the TSR have understood that they must exercise the law of SILENCE on state crime or else they must take the risk of having their Life destroyed by the Authorities as Julian Assange showed that this was the case for foreign journalists

See interview of Stéphanie GIBAUD on the TV broadcast of “Infrarouge”.

Thanks to Stéphanie GIBAUD for reminding in this TV broadcast that American soldiers have silenced journalists by murdering them. It is thanks to Julian ASSANGE that the documents showing these assassinations were made known to the public.

Stéphanie GIBAUD
Whistleblower

Author of :
la traque des lanceurs d'alerte

Prerequisite to be known
In 2016, the dissident lawyer explained that in Switzerland the country’s high authorities did not murder journalists to silence them. They neutralized them simply by threatening them with economic death (boycott and job loss) if they wanted to reveal state scandals. For him, whistleblowers are journalists that the state cannot censor

FOR REMINDER, THE ROLE OF JOURNALISTS IS TO WORK FOR THE GENERAL INTEREST. THE LATTER IS NOT TO ALLOW THE HIGH AUTHORITIES OF A STATE TO VIOLATE HUMAN RIGHTS BY IMPOSING THE LAW OF SILENCE ON CRIMES INVOLVING MEMBERS OF THE STATE WITH ANY METHOD AT ALL !

In particular, the revolutionary new method of neutralizing surveillance and information systems used by the Swiss authorities to cover organized crime, used in the frame of the FIFA case, must be made public in detail.

Historical background
Thanks to Julian ASSANGE and Rui PINTO, who made secret documents public, the LAW OF SILENCE was broken for the public. The latter was made aware that journalists, witnesses of the violation of human rights, were silenced by being murdered. He also discovered the  FIFA scandals.

The Swiss authorities had to find a revolutionary method so that they no longer had secret documents allowing whistleblowers to break the LAW OF SILENCE

THIS METHOD WAS FOUND: IT IS THE SIMPLE SOLUTION

It was Michael LAUBER who found this method almost flawless:

"Just don’t take minutes of the hearings with defendants so that there are no documents to prove that the investigation is made in compliance with the Values of the Constitutionn!"

This method is simply brilliant to impose the LAW OF SILENCE. Without minutes, nothing is provable anymore, except if there were hidden recordings !

ABOUT THE ENTHUSIASM OF PARLIAMENT’S MANAGEMENT COMMITTEES

Michael LAUBER convinced the management committes that his method was brilliant.

He could even run for the next general Prosecutor election.

Until this method convinces also the supervisory authority of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, the election is postponed.

See the position taken by Jean-Paul GSCHWING, Chairman of the Judicial Committee of the Parliament.

ABOUT THE INVESTIGATION MADE BY THE SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY OF THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OF THE CONFEDERATION

We remind that it is the Supervisory Authority of the MPC, which considers that it is not acceptable for a hearing not to be the subject of a minutesl.

On this website, we quote the existence of a recording, which Doris LEUTHARD heard for a hearing that was not the subject of any minutesl.

Those who heard the tape will know that this hearing was without minutes, as it was a blackmail session to dismiss, in case of refusal to keep quiet, to cover organized crime……

...Michael LAUBER, who must be familiar with the file, may have been inspired by this blackmail hearing to develop his revolutionary method to rule the law of silence, without threatening the journalists with economic death !

infrarouge

Blog de Michèle

Décision

Olivier JOURNOT, General Prosecutor of the State of Geneva, elected by the people of Geneva, explains that he enforces the Federal Constitution to break the Law of Silence on the offence of trading in Influence involving magistrates.

Explanations of Prosecutor of the people

Michael LAUBER, General Prosecutor of the Confederation, elected by sworn members of Parliament, explains that he applies the penal code of delirious procedures put in place by Parliament, which allows the latter’s lobbies to enforce the Law of Silence on the offence of trading in Influence

Explanations of Prosecutor of the Parliament

Olivier JOURNOT
General Prosecutor,
elected by the people,
Of Geneva State

A prosecutor with open-ended authority, who is not accountable to Parliament but to the people.

He reminds the principle of separation of political powers which gives him the power and duty to act against magistrates involved in trading in influence

To listen TJ Prosecutor interview of April 9th at 7.30 pm

The Swiss General Prosecutors have a clear and unambiguous speaking. They enforce the will of those who elected them to be hired by the State.

EXAMPLE OF THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR OF THE CONFEDERATION

Case of Violation of the separation of political powers with his election made by politicians

Michael LAUBER,  is a Prosecutor of Parliament, hired by sworn members of Parliament who elected him under the influence of lobbies.

When criticized for enforcing the Law of Silence in the FIFA case of trading in influence, he explains that he must respect the will of the sworn elected officials and enforce their penal code l

See article of Thursday 25 April 2019 By Boris Busslinger for "Le TEMPS

He clearly states that the code of penal procedure does not allow to respect the Values of the Constitution, quote: :

«J’entends tous les jours dire que nous n’allons pas assez vite», a répondu Michael Lauber. «Mais le Code de procédure pénale suisse est ainsi fait. Cela demande du temps.»

He simply reminds that he is the Prosecutor of Parliament. The latter has put in place a code of delirious procedures that paralyzes justice. These procedures allow the Prosecutors of Parliaments to circumvent compliance with the federal Constitution. As a reminder to:

EXAMPLE OF THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR OF THE STATE OF GENEVA

Case of the respect for the separation of political powers with its election by the people

Olivier JOURNOT, is a People’s Prosecutor. He was hired by the people who elected him.

When criticized for breaking the Law of SILENCE on trading in influence involving Magistrates, he reminds the principle of functioning of the political powers separation.

He reminds that he must respect the will of the people enshrined in the federal Constitution, and that a Prosecutor has the duty to investigate in depth.

He states that a prosecutor must act and must fulfill his mission if there is suspicion of a criminal offence. He reminds that a prosecutor does not play CASINO, but does his job when there is a suspicion of a criminal offence.

To listen Prosecutor interview in the TJ of 7.30 pm of April 9 th

Unfortunately, there are no longer any People’s Prosecutors in Switzerland, but only Parliament Prosecutors.

THE LAW PROJECT ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES would make it possible to force the Prosecutors elected by the Parliaments to respect the Constitution.

See Project : LSSEMP_19

PEOPLE:

PROSECUTOR
O_Journot

PARLIAMENT:

CODE

PROSECUTOR
M_LAUBER

The Swiss authorities, put in the dock with the reward offered in Strasbourg to whistle-blowers, react by no longer denying the malfunctions of justice and the dishonesty of magistrates above all suspicion  :

Mr. Hanspeter Uster, the new President of the Supervisory Authority of the Public Ministry of the Confederation (AS-MPC), condemns the advantages, hidden from the public, granted by the General Prosecutor of the Confederation, Michael LAUBER to “Untouchables”

SEE TJ de 19H30 of 25 april 2019

Hanspeter USTER
Lawyer
Survivor of the Killing of Zug
President of the Supervisory
 Authority of the MPC

As a reminder, Rui PINTO was rewarded the previous week in the Parliament of Strasbourg for having launched the alert on information hidden from the public concerning corruption within FIFA, etc….., and it goes on !

see L’equipe paper of Feb. 1, 2019

See Awards in the Parliament

The law of silence imposed by the Prosecutor Michael LAUBER on his secret actions is the same as the one imposed by Pierre MAUDET on his secret actions

Geneva citizens also react with the launch of two initiatives to fight against magistrates, reputed above all suspicion, who violate their oath of magistrates by abusing of their authority to give advantages to “untouchables” or to accept advantages from them.

See Geneva Initiatives

The awards given on 16 April in Parliament of Strasbourg to whistle-blowers, including Jasmine Motarjemi (Nestlé case), Rui PINTO (FIFA case), Julian ASSANGE (case of disinformation of citizens by public authorities), reminded that it is not enough for a magistrate or an elected official to be powerful and brilliant to respect the Public’s right to information on criminal activities

These awards remind us that in Switzerland, there are also magistrates who act as “Bernard MADOFF” to deceive the public with hidden data.

These magistrates reputed above all suspicion are so brilliant and big talkers that they got a face a virgin could trust, while they are impostors who work against the general interest of citizens.

Among these big talkers who deceive our people by serving the interests of members of criminal organizations are Michael LAUBER, Fabien GASSER, Adrian URWYLER, Claude ROUILLER, Pierre-Yves MAILLARD, Pierre MAUDET, and many others. , all magistrates who were presented by the media as brilliant personalities reputed above all suspicion by their Oath.

It is up to everyone to discover on this site the hidden side of these magistrates. It is up to everyone to appreciate that they are "Bernard MADOFF" to whom the media dared not ask to justify publicly their actions taken in the dark.

Thank you to the whistle-blowers for showing the hidden face of these magistrates who would got a face of virgin could trust, while they give benefits to members of criminal organizations. After Pierre MAUDET, it is Michael LAUBER’s turn to break the silence on this law of silence that he grants to defendants by doing no protocol of the interviews.

Following the rewards offered to whistle-blowers on the violation of the public’s right to information, Hanspeter USTER sets an example by condemning the actions hidden from the public by Prosecutor Michael LAUBER :

After the award at the European Parliament to Rui PINTO for his warning on the data hidden from the public on FIFA, it was unbearable for the General Prosecutor of the Confederation to participate in secret meetings, without protocol, with FIFA leaders

On 25 April 2019, Hanspeter USTER, President of the Supervisory Authority of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Confederation (AS-MPC), gave a strong first sign in condemning these secret and protocol-free hearings of the General Prosecutor of the Confederation

He’s not the only one. On social media activists protest against these sworn magistrates who grant benefits to the untouchable by making their entourage use the law of silence on their actions

See blog of Michèle Herzog :

is Michael LAUBER untouchable ?:

Genevan citizen also set an example by launching two cantonal initiatives to reduce the power of high magistrates reputed above any suspicion who violates their Oath in a crass way

See Geneva Initiatives

It should be stressed that the malfunctions of the supervisory bodies stem from the absence of separation of powers. They must not depend on Parliament but on apolitical elites appointed directly by the people

Hence the importance of the project of launching an initiative for ““THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES"

See project : LSSEMP_19

TJ de 19H30

Cas FIFA

Award Rui PINTO

BLOG _MH

initiatives

LSSEMP_19

After Dirk MARTY, shocked that Julian ASSANGE was arrested for revealing criminal practices, it is the Swiss authorities who find themselves in the dock with the award recognises a Swiss whistle-blower, on April 16th at a ceremony in Parliament in Strasbourg

JASMINE MOTARJEMI,
A Swiss expert, PhD
Whistle-blower.
awarded at a ceremony at the PARLIAMENT in Strasbourg

Julian ASSANGE, Jasmine MOTARJEMI and Rui PINTO, three whistle-blowers rewarded at Strasbourg for their fight for the Public’s Right to Information!

See Michèle Herzog’s blog

She showed that an executive of a company like NESTLÉ, who would do his duty as a scientific expert to alert about malfunctions within the company, will find himself censored and harassed.

The reason is simple : The Swiss Courts do not have the means to enforce the Values of the Swiss Constitution.

The Swiss Parliament has set up a well-oiled judicial system that allows elected officials and judges who do not want to honour the Constitution in their decisions, to do so with impunity.

On April 16th, during a ceremony in the Parliament of Strasbourg, three whistle-blowers were rewarded for their courage in defending the PUBLIC RIGHT TO INFORMATION.

Among these three whistleblowers is the expert Ms. Jasmine MOTARJEMI.

Every Swiss citizen is invited to listen to his speech in Strasbourg.

Click here

Everyone can thus discover how the Swiss Authorities allow the Untouchables to not respect the Values of our Constitution by grossly violating their oaths of elected officials and magistrates.

To listen to the following video with the intervention of Yasmine Motarjemi at minute 37 .

Video

To all citizens who defend the PUBLIC RIGHT TO INFORMATION , please sign the following petition for the release of Julian ASSANGE

Petition

To ensure that the Values of our Constitution are respected by our elected representatives and judges, participate in the project of launching an initiative of ““THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES"

See project : LSSEMP_19

Video

blog

LSSEMP_19

Dick MARTY, the former General Prosecutor of Ticino interviewed by the RTS on the arrest of Julian ASSANGE, says :

« This arrest is shocking for someone who told the truth, who revealed criminal practices.»

...the RTS is asked to also talk about criminal practices in Switzerland, and not only abroad.

Dick MARTY
Former General Prosecutor
State of Ticino

Interview by the RTS, TJ of 19h30, Thursday 11, avril 2019

Thanks to Dick MARTY for defending the PUBLIC RIGHT to information on the criminal practices of the US AUTHORITIES and to speak out against censorship made with the violation of human rights.

But the RTS must also ensure the PUBLIC RIGHT TO INFORMATION on criminal practices in Switzerland committed by members of criminal organizations.

It also has the duty to inform the Swiss about the censorship exercised by members of the Swiss AUTHORITIES complicit in these criminal practices in order to give benefits to members of law societies.

In particular, she must interview a Prosecutor about the criminal behaviour described by the request for a parliamentary inquiry and the Law of Silence imposed by :

1. a national Counsellor as Me Philippe BAUER,
2. a President of the Judicial Council as Adrian URWYLER,
3. a former federal judge as Claude ROUILLER,
4. a President of the Council of State as Perre-Yves MAILLARD,
5.  etc.,

these members of the Swiss AUTHORITIES have all abused their power to give benefits to criminals.

See letter addressed to the RTS Editor

190417DE_BR

See the example of the State Councillor Pierre-Yves MAILLARD who imposes the LAW OF SILENCE by not responding to letters and by not keeping his commitmentss

190226DE_PM

Interview

190417DE_BR

051217DP_GC

190226DE_PM

Johannes Frölicher, the new President of the Judicial Council, has a past as a judge with a bun, photographed "in the middle of the jungle" on May 29, 2017.

See: La Liberté du 29 mai 2017

Johannes Frölicher
President of the Judicial Council of Fribourg

Dr Adrian URWYLER, his predecessor, having resigned by March 1st, 2019,  Johannnes Frölicher is requested to deal with the case of abuse of authority of his Predecessor.

See : 190410DE_JF

It is reminded that Dr Adrian URWYLER repeatedly violated the respect of the Federal Constitution to cover the acts of a criminal organization with the help of several senior judges, see comments below, dated: 16.01.19

With the announcement of the strike of women who are unable to enforce their fundamental rights, ...

.... young people who demonstrate in order to be heard by the elite in power, who do not respect the environment, ...

...National Councillor Philippe BAUER who discredits all justice by explaining that he uses his power of politician to give advantages to his clients……..

… Dr Adrian URWYLER, former President of the Judicial Council, who violated fundamental rights in a grime way, despite the intervention of the former President of the Grand Council of Fribourg, Bruno BOSCHUNG, etc, …..

…we can still hope that this new atypical President, who makes tandem, photographed «in the middle of the Jungle», will enforce fundamental rights rather than the advantages, which Dr. Adrian URWLYLER has granted to members of law societies.

Johannes Frölicher would then be the first President of the Judicial Council to dare to attack the criminal organization which enjoyed the protection of Adrian URWYLER. He would be the first President to break the LAW OF SILENCE, by enforcing the fundamental rights to be heard and to access to neutral and independent tribunals...

See reminder of the contents of the letter of February 1st, 2019, left unanswered, below, exposing to Johannes Frölicher, the behaviour of his predecessor who was fully aware of the contents of the parliamentary inquiry request,051217DP_GC

It is reminded that the latter, Dr Adrian URWYLER, is complicit in a scam of several millions for having given advantages to members of law fraternities by abusing of his Authority. With full knowledge of the facts, he imposed SILENCE’s law on the violation of fundamental rights, including access to neutral and independent tribunals, to allow members of brotherhoods of lawyers to commit economic crime with impunity.

See reminder : 190410DE_JF

Courier of February 1st, 2019 : 190201DE_CM

Information to the President of the Grand Council : 190410DE_RM

051217DP_GC

La Liberté

190410DE_JF

190410DE_RM

IT IS Philippe BAUER, THE NATIONAL COUNSELLOR, WHO IS CONCERNED BY THE BREACH OF TRUST , AND EXPLANATIONS ARE REQUIRED FROM HIM :

See exhibit : 190403DE_PB

November 28th, 2018
The National Counsellor PLR
Me Philippe BAUER
asking for Pierre MAUDET to resign,

Philippe BAUER is in turn caught in the turmoil of the Trading in Influence

It was a High School Student who has uncovered the proverbial cans of worms oozing in the lawyer’s rule by reacting to the advice of Nuria GORRITE to take an interest in politics. He wants explanations from Me Philippe BAUER on the decisions that can be taken by the Presidents of the Bar to violate fundamental rights

There is also a reader of Arcinfo who discovered the request for a parliamentary inquiry with the advantages granted by Philippe BAUER to members of brotherhood of lawyers which violate the fundamental rights. She wants explanations from Philippe BAUER, following the publication of the article of September 3, 2018 by Arcinfo which questions him.

See : article_du_03_09_2019

Read also:
page 24 of FOCUS droit 2018

TODAY, the National Councillor Philippe BAUER IS IN TURN BEING BLAMED FOR FACTS NETTLY MORE SERIOUS THAN THOSE REPROACHED TO Pierre MAUDET.

A dissident lawyer, criticizes him for working for a criminal organization. The following three documents show that this claim is well founded:

051217DP_GC.....181030DE_VP ....190306DE_IG

A High School Student wants explanations from Philippe BAUER, by reacting to the advice given, which has given to them Nuria GORRITE :

It is important that Philippe BAUER answer the High School Student’s question on the request of the parliamentary inquiry, 051217DP_GC . This question is very relevant :

see exhibit: 190403DE_PB

« What is the risk for the key witness, a member of a brotherhood of lawyers, if he does not respect the decision of the President of the BAR which forbids him to testif ? "

An Arcinfo reader alerts about the violation of the Values of our Constitution by Phillippe BAUER who abuses his power as National Counsellor PLR, quote :

"J’étais loin de me douter qu’il utilisait son pouvoir politique de Conseiller national PLR pour donner des avantages aux membres de confréries d’avocats. Je vous recommande d’écrire à Philippe BAUER pour qu’il s’explique publiquement sur les faits que vous décrivez. C’est son devoir de Conseiller national d’être transparent comme le veut la tête du Parti suisse PLR, après l’affaire MAUDET"

see exhibit: 190403DE_PB

The solution to end the violations of the Constitution by Me Philippe BAUER, Pierre MAUDET, and many other elected officials and magistrates is :

"THE PROJECT OF INITIATIVE OF “THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES"

See project : LSSEMP_19

...in the meantime, it is important that Philippe BAUER explain himself and that the RTS inform the citizens !

The RTS gives an explanation on the LAW OF SILENCE which it broke by Parliamentarians for jihadists who did not get a response from Parliament, but which it did not break for much more serious but not spectacular cases.

See below for comments dated February 13, 20199

Exhibit : 190213DE_GM

Bernard RAPPAZ, the chief editor, started to respond, and suddenly he’s not talking....….

TV Current Events and MM
Bernard RAPPAZ
Chief Editor

Bernard RAPPAZ's unfinished answer

See exhibit : 190327DE_BR

190226BR_DE

We can’t see on the photo, if there is the National Councillor Philippe BAUER, or a high magistrate, who points a gun at him from behind on the head so that all of a sudden Bernard RAPPAZ stops talking.

Apparently, there are people who make decisions for it... and the RTS does not have the Freedom of Information that is expected from it

The fact remains that every citizen has the right to be informed about the actions of these elected representatives who give advantages to members of lawyers' fraternities, as did it Me Philippe BAUER.

The high school student addressed by Nuria GORRITE certainly cannot imagine that in Switzerland :

" A President of the Court, such as Bertrand SAUTEREL, can decide to say that the copyright violation did not cause damage of more than CHF 4000, while he has a judicial expertise that shows that the damage was more than 2 million.."

Nor can they know that this lie of the President of the Court was used to blackmail with dismissal to cover up a false accusation….involving Philippe Bauer, see exhibit : 190306DE_IG

They have no idea how elected officials and magistrates can violate the federal Constitution in a filthy way, see exhibit : 181030DE_VP

Women and young people, who are not jihadists, only observe that they have to protest and strike to be heard, whereas jihadists have nothing to do to be heard.....

Bernard RAPPAZ is invited to break the silence on the criminal organization for which Philippe BAUER and other elected officials and judges work.

190327DE_BR

The high school student will be even more surprised to learn that in Switzerland, a President of the Court, like Bertrand SAUTEREL, who decides to say that a damage of more than 2 million is worth only 4,000 CHF, received the «terrible punishment» to be promoted  State Judge,...
……. for having blackmail with dismissal to cover up a false accusation made by members of brotherhood of lawyers
…even more amazing, those, who promoted him as State Judge, knew about the request for a parliamentary inquiry……

051217DP_GC.....181030DE_VP ....190306DE_IG

190213DE_GM

190226BR_DE

190327DE_BR

181030DE_VP

190306DE_IG

«Get involved in politics or others will make the decisions for you.»

After being shocked by a decision of the authorities, Nuria GORRITE decided to be a politician in order to be able to make the decisions herself

See article le TEMPS 13.11.18

Nuria Gorrite
Vaud Council of State
President

With the Vaud government which has since today a majority of women, she is one of those who could finally break OMERTA on the outrageous decisions made by Pierre-Yves MAILLARD to cover organized crime by members of lawyers' fraternities with the help of his state collaborators

We remind that Pierre-Yves MAILLARD had been made aware of the false expertise made by the former Federal Socialist Judge, Claude Rouiller, to allow members of brotherhood lawyers to commit economic crime with impunity.

He knew that Judge Bertrand SAUTEREL had made the decision to say that a damage of more than 2 million by judicial expertise was only 4,000 CHF to cover organized crime.

lHe had been made aware that his collaborators intrigued on his behalf to enrich the richest by violating the rights of the weakest.

Voir 170408DE_PM

Warned to repair the damage :

See 190226DE_PM

Pierre-Yves Maillard used the formidable weapon which allows a President of the Council of State to violate fundamental rights, namely :

« the Silence law that may decide to impose a President of the Council of State who wants to cover organized crime, or to cover the outrageous decisions of his collaborators who represent him by acting without his knowledge”»

See 190318DE_NG

Today, on the eve of the strike of women who demand equality, Nuria GORRITE is at the helm of the Council of State :

She has the power to show that women make decisions which respect the federal Constitution, whose equality between citizens. This is a real societal issue as described by Nathalie FONTANET, Geneva State Counsellor.

See:TJ 19H30, March 6th :Interview of Natalie FONTANET

Expected response in the coming days !

See : 190318DE_NG

le TEMPS

190318DE_NG

190226DE_PM

170408DE_PM

The three federal counsellors, aware that the authorities are unable to enforce equality, are organising a summit meeting between women.

See : TJ 19h30, March 6, 2019

A new generation student, invited to the women’s summit meeting, asks to the seniors the following fundamental question for future constitutional respect :

"What could be changed in the Swiss system in relation to women, what could be done or not done to have a better future?"

Romane Mischler
Student
Invited at the Women's Summit Meeting

Answer to Romane MISCHLER :

"Equality could be respected with the law for the supervision of oaths of elected officials and magistrates by the people with curative measure."

See part 190312DE_RM

First benefit of this law

The first benefit of this law will be to enable the people to identify the elected and magistrates who lobby elected officials to cover up organized crime, by censoring them!

For example, in the above-mentioned letter (190312DE_RM), we quote the case of the national Councillor, Valérie Piller Carrard, who had committed to respond, see letter dated November 5, 2018 (181105DE_VP), and still not able to respond despite a reminder, see letter dated February 13, 2019 (190213DE_VP)

It is noted here that two parliamentary journalists have been called to the rescue to enforce equality under the law and to identify those who impose the “law of silence” to Valérie Piller Carrard.
See part 190306DE_PC

It is reminded that this silence serves to cover organized crime with the advantages given by Philippe BAUER to members of brotherhood of lawyers

See:TJ 19H30 of March 6, Interview of Natalie FONTANET

The inability of the authorities to enforce equality between citizens, a right guaranteed by the Swiss Constitution, led to the social conflict which is strike.

The fundamental question raised by this strike is :

“Why are the Swiss authorities unable to enforce the fundamental rights guaranteed by the federal Constitution?”

190312DE_RM

THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE :

there is no independent supervisory body to ensure that Magistrates and elected officials respect their Oath

The privileges granted by the National Councillor Philippe BAUER - acting as lawyer and former President of the Bar association - to the brotherhoods of lawyers, is one of the examples that clearly shows this lack of supervisory body

See part: 190306DE_IG

The solution to end violations of the Constitution by the Authorities is :

"THE PROJECT OF INITIATIVE OF “THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURE"

See project : LSSEMP_19

If this law existed, women would not need to go on strike, because their equality rights and all the other rights guaranteed by the Constitution would have been respected for a long time ago!

FOR A BETTER FUTURE LIFE WITH THE RESPECT OF EQUALITY :

Romane Mischler and all those who want a better future, where the authorities respect the Constitution, are invited to support this initiative project !

All citizens, who are outraged by the way the National Counsellor Philippe BAUER has given advantages to the members of brotherhood lawyers, are also invited to support this initiative project.

Their support is important for the respect of equality, because this project will not leave unpunished the elected or magistrates, like Phillippe BAUER or Pierre MAUDET, who violate their Oath to respect article 35 of the federal Constitution.

They will have to help compensate the victims of their actions, which should discourage those who want to violate their Oath from doing so!

190306DE_IG

The real issue of the June 14 strike :

It is to break the law of silence imposed by elected officials and magistrates, which they apply in order not to respect the Values of the Constitution. The violation of the respect of equality is made with this law of silence.

The serious social conflict evidenced by this 14 June strike, with the meeting at the women’s summit and the rumour of the prestigious charitable action of Doris LEUTHARD, should encourage parliamentary journalists to reveal the content of the hidden record that Doris LEUTHARD heard.

190306DE_PC

The content of this recording would make it possible to understand for the people, the real scope of the advantages given by Philippe BAUER to the members of brotherhood of lawyers.

The people could understand how criminal organizations operates and why Philippe BAUER is protected by the law of silence

The swiss people would understand the importance that these parliamentary journalists are identifying those who prevent Valérie Piller Carrard from responding when she knows that there is a violation of equality before the lawce.

In Summary as Nathalie FONTANET dixit :

"RESPECT OF EQUALITY IS A REAL NATIONAL ISSUE

"

R.MISCHLER

N. FONTANET

190312DE_RM

LSSEMP_19

190306DE_IG

181105DE_VP

190213DE_VP

190306DE_PC

Parliamentary journalists disappointed by Doris LEUTHARD who allegedly took a food mandate with a suspicion of conflict of interest

See rts replay 12H45 TJ March 1st

But there is a rumor, based on a hidden recording to the Press, which shows that Doris LEUTHARD wants to set an example for former judges to enforce the federal Constitution

Philippe CASTELLA
Parliamentary correspondent
LA LIBERTÉ

She has no children and her pension of federal Councillor is enough for her.

On the other hand, there is a rumour that Doris LEUTHARD, a lawyer, who is in possession of a recording that shows how elected officials, like Philippe BAUER, granted benefits to members of brotherhood lawyers, made the decision to make a prestigious charitable action to set an example for former magistrates

Since her pension is enough for her and she knows that some citizens had their rights violated by magistrates and elected officials who abused of their power, she took this COOP mandate to participate in repairing the damages of victims of abuse of Authority.

She is not going to use this money to complete her pension of former federal Councillor, but she is going to set an example by putting all these COOP mandates into a private fund to repair the damage caused by corrupt elites.

See part: 190306DE_PC

This rumor based on a recording hidden to the Press can be supported by analytical argument !

Parliamentary journalists Philippe CASTELLA and Bernard WUTHRICH are invited to inform voters about the behaviour of elected officials who have given advantages to colleagues by violating the rights of our people as did it the National Counsellor Philippe BAUER

See part: 190306DE_IG

190306DE_PC

190306DE_IG

The Parliament of Geneva gives the example, for the other States, by acknowledging receipt of the letters and indicating the curative measures they will take against a high magistrate who betrayed the confidence of the people

Jean ROMAIN
Geneva Parliament President

Letter of January 29th from Dr D. Erni to Jean ROMAIN

See part : 190129DE_GC

Appendix : LSSEMP_19

Acknowledgement of receipt of the President of Parliament with the description of the curative measures taken

See Part : 190215JR_DE

Thanks to Jean ROMAIN for leading by example !

It is reminded that Dr Adrian URWYLER, one of the highest magistrates of the Canton of Fribourg, President of the Judiciary Council and President of the Cantonal Tribunal, knew perfectly the content of the request for a parliamentary investigation

See part : 051217DP_GC

We know today that it was members of a secret society, a freemason lodge, who set up this judicial scam described by the request for a parliamentary investigation.

Dr Adrian URWYLER knew how Presidents of the BAR use the power of the Courts to allow members of lawyers' brotherhoods to commit crime with impunity by violating access to neutral and independent courts.

This sworn magistrate himself helped «his colleagues» to commit a damage of several million by violating access to neutral and independent courts

On his side, Pierre MAUDET, one of the highest Magistrates of the Canton of Geneva, President of the Council of State, is also involved in influence peddling. He also supported a secret society like the P26,

see link : abudhabi-p26-nepotisme-pierre-maudet

...but, Pierre Maudet  is not directly involved in organized crime as the one described in the request for a parliamentary investigation.

Answers with curative measures are still expected from the Judicial Council and the Fribourg Parliament, following the damage caused by the serious violation of fundamental rights by Dr Adrian URWYLER with the benefits he granted to members of lawyers associations. See parts :

190201DE_CM
190215DE_CM

190215DE_RM

Thanks to Jean ROMAIN for leading by example !

190129DE_GC

LSSEMP_19

190215JM_DE

051217DP_GC

190201DE_CM

190215DE_CM

190215DE_RM

WHAT DISTURBS ME IS NOT THAT YOU LIED TO ME, IT’S THAT FROM NOW ON, I WON’T BE ABLE TO BELIEVE YOU"
(Truth of Nietzsche)

See RTS TJ 19h30 Tuesday 19 feb.

No justice can restore confidence in citizens who have disrespected a population

Karin Keller Sutter
Minister of Justice
Federal Councillor

KARIN KELLER SUTTER explains that it is not enough that citizens, who have violated the Values of our Constitution, to claim that they will no longer violate these Values for this to be true !

Confidence is broken and they will never be credible again.

No judgement can restore confidence in citizens who do not respect the Values of the Swiss Constitution

...This Truth is also valid for people who has the responsibility of a task of state and who do not respect the Values of the Constitution !

Note : Cynthia GANI’s explanations showed a critical vulnerability of our justice system that no one had mastered. These explanations are no longer available from the document published by the RTS, see site RTS,

These explanations also disappeared from the RTS-replay video of the TJ on Saturday, February 9th. Instead of the interview with Cynthia GANI, there is the message: "this video section was only available for a specified period of time".

The judiciary system vulnerability has not disappeared, even if the interview was censored :

This vulnerability is the confidence that justice cannot restore if citizens have betrayed the Values of our Constitution.

For the first time, a justice minister shows that she is aware that if a magistrate commits a denial of justice, or a state official commits a procedural violation, there will be no way to prevent them from reoffending because they are citizens who have betrayed our trust....

The real problem is that the state has not managed to dissuade them to violate the Values of the Constitution, before they do it for the first time

WHAT IS TRUE FOR PIERRE MAUDET AND ALSO TRUE FOR JIHADISTS IS ALSO TRUE FOR ALL MAGISTRATES WHO BETRAY OUR PEOPLE:

"JUSTICE DOES NOT ALLOW TO RESTORE CONFIDENCE IN CITIZENS WHO BETRAY THE VALUES OF OUR CONSTITUTION"

=> WE WON’T BE ABLE ANY MORE TO TRUST THEM!

Most recently, Bertrand Tschanz, a clerk at the Estavayer-le-lac Prosecution Board, who has already violated procedural guarantees on several occasions, has shown that he is beginning to do so again with more boldness :

this time he made a seizure, by announcing it only after it was made ! It is a gross breach of procedural guarantees
See part 190215DE_CM

Criminal complaint is filed against criminal organization, as these procedural violations serve to cover benefits that President of the Bar, such as Me Philippe BAUER and others, have granted to members of brotherhoods of lawyers

The case has been adressed to appropiate authorities.
See part 190215DE_RM

An efficient preventing measure against criminal organization will be :

THE PROJECT OF INITIATIVE OF “THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES”

See part : LSSEMP_19

See RTS

190215DE_CM

190215DE_RM

LSSEMP_19

SWISS TELEVISION HELPS JIHADISTS TO GET AN ANSWER !

See website RTS

Is it necessary to be a jihadist in order that the Swiss Television help you to get an answer from National Counsellors with the explanations of a journalist, broadcasted in a 4-minute 5-second report on the television news of 7:30 pm ?

Cynthia GANI
Journalist helping jihadists to understand Swiss law on the television news

Gilles Marchand, Director of the RTS, is invited to grant the same length of time on the television news to other citizens who are in an unbearable waiting for an answer from the Parliament !

190213DE_GM

190210_RTS

180328DE_GM

For example, during an interview in October 2018, National Counsellor Valérie Piller CARRARD, a member of Parliament’s Supervisory Committee, was made aware of the critical vulnerability in the Swiss judicial system. She knows that this vulnerability allows members of brotherhoods of lawyers, to commit crimes with full impunity by applying a right, which is not inaccessible to the people.

See part : 181030DE_VP

She is committed to provide answers to this question :

See part: 181105DE_VP

After more than three months of waiting, she could not provide any answers.

See part :190213DE_VP

Journalists contacted to put an end to this unbearable waiting for an answer, do not want to act, it is a Tabou subject. One of them mentioned the existence of a conspiracy theory that could explain this situation.

REQUIRED INTERVENTION BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE RTS

Gilles Marchand, Director of the RTS, is made aware that it is not necessary to be a jihadist to benefit from 4 minutes 5 seconds of television news to put an end to an unbearable waiting for an answer from Parliament.

Moreover, it is reminded that the RTS cannot discriminate against citizens who are not members of a terrorist organization :

1) on the one hand, the RTS cannot help jihadists to avoid an unbearable waiting for an answer of Parliament, because they are members of a criminal organization

2) on the other hand if the RTS helps jihadists to get answers from National Councillors, then it must also help those who are not members of a criminal organization, to get answers to put an end to their unbearable waiting for an answer of Parliamentt

190213DE_GM

He is reminded that the unbearable waiting for an answer of the Authorities is a situation that affects many citizens as shown by Michèle Herzog’s Blogs. It’s not just the jihadists who are involved.

He is also reminded of the explanations given by Me de ROUGEMONT on the Zoug killing. The latter claims that this killing could have been prevented without the unbearable waiting imposed by elected officials.

190122DE_HU

190213DE_GM

site RTS

180328DE_GM

181105DE_VP

181030DE_VP

190213DE_VP

Blogs

190122DE_HU

…, by quoting this Nietzsche Truth, a journalist highlights a critical vulnerability of the Swiss democracy model with her unreliable judicial system :

There is no deterrent penalty to prevent recidivism of magistrates who betray our people by violating their oath with a strategy of lies and manipulation. They have to resign!

le Temps 13.01.2019

Fati MANSOUR
Journalist
Newspaper "le TEMPS"

JUSTICE PARALYZED WITH A CODE OF CRAZY PROCEDURES

Clément Bürge had made the observation in the Newspaper l’HEBDO that justice was paralyzed with crazy proceduress.

See HEBDO article on the paralysis of justice of April 7th, 2016

FATI MANSOUR SHOWS THAT JUSTICE IS ACTUALLY PARALYZED BY IMMORAL MAGISTRATES WHO CANNOT BE PUNISHED

With a quote, Fati MANSOUR has shown that there is no deterrent penalty against a magistrate who has violated his Oath with a strategy of lies and manipulation

One way to correct the situation is the initiative for the Law on the Supervision of Oaths of elected Representative and Magistrates by the People

LSSEMP_19

By quoting a Nietzsche Truth, Fati MANSOUR shows that the request - to have the Prosecutor recused made by Pierre MAUDET - is one more crazy procedure. This request won’t change the fact that we can’t believe him anymore, because of what he lied about.

Truth of Nietzsche : le Temps 13.01.2019

This request for recusal, motivated by the transmission to the Council of State «of elements covered by secrecy», shows that Pierre MAUDET does not want to play transparency with the people. He wants to impose again the Code of Silence rather than laying its cards on the table.

Le Temps January 16th, 2019

EQUALITY OF CITIZENS IN FRONT OF THE LAW

In her February 3rd blog on “Equality of citizens in front of the law”, Michèle Herzog wonders about the dysfunctions of the codes of procedure and the deterrent penalty that can be taken against Magistrates, such as Prosecutors, who do not respect the fundamental rights of citizens

She expressed surprise that the Deputies do not take corrective measures

Blog of February 3rd

It should be noted that the representatives of Geneva reacted to make the sad observation that :

The people has no immediate curative measures to dismiss a magistrate who violates his oath with a strategy of lies and manipulation,

See below the comments of Pierre VANEK and Alexandre de Senarclens dated January 30, 2019.

There is an awareness that a magistrate who violates his Oath is not trustworthy of the people

Above all, it must be observed that the Truth of Nietzsche shows that an Oath is sacred and that a person who betrays it with lies cannot occupy certain functions of state :

"The violation of an Oath by a Magistrate, like a Prosecutor, is like a bus driver who has committed not to drive with alcohol in his blood and who violates his Promise and endangers his passengers. There is nothing to judge. This driver is too dangerous in his driver position and he has to change of job"

To lay its cards on the table to end oaths violation with lies

It is time for Parliamentarians to discover the crazy procedures applied by magistrates to give benefits to members of the brotherhoods of lawyers by applying the Code of Silence. This is one of the challenges that must face the Fribourg Parliament.

181030DE_VP

190201DE_RM

190201DE_CM

LeTemps13.01

LeTemps16.01

MH_03.02

181030DE_VP

190201DE_RM

190201DE_CM

LSSEMP_19

THE GENEVAN PARLIAMENT GIVES THE EXAMPLE BY TAKING A CORRECTIVE ACTION TO RESPECT THE PEOPLE. A VULNERABILITY OF THE LAW MAKES INEFFECTIVE THE CORRECTION ACTION

Further to that Pierre MAUDET violated his Oath by lying, the Parliament wanted to enforce the Values of the Constitution by requiring that he resigns.

On the left, Deputy Pierre VANEK called back with dignity that it is not necessary that P. MAUDET extends this vaudeville team. He has to resign further to the violation of his Oath with lies

Pierre VANEK
Parliament Deputy, GE

On the right, Deputy Alexandre De Senarclens, President of the PLR, explained that the Confidence is broken with the violation by Pierre MAUDET of its magistrate's Oath with lies

Alexandre de Senarclens
PLR PRESIDENT
Parliament Deputy, GE

See RTS : TJ de 19h30/28.01.2019

Pierre MAUDET's reaction: I have the power to refuse to resign and I refuse to resign while I violated my Oath with liess

See : journal le matin 25.1.2019

Pierre MAUDET REFUSED TO RESIGN WHILE HE RECOGNIZED TO HAVE VIOLATED HIS OATH WITH LIES. HE SHOWED THAT THE PEOPLE HAS NO POSSIBILITY TO TAKE AN IMMEDIATE CURATIVE MEASURE TO NEUTRALIZE A MAGISTRATE WHO HAVE VIOLATED THIS OATH WITH LIES

The Parliament voted in his turn a resolution which asks to Pierre MAUDET to resign. He explained to Pierre Maudet that the confidence was broken further to the violation of his Oath with lies.

Pierre MAUDET showed that the Parliament is powerless to force an immoral Magistrate, who has violated his Oath with lies, to resign

190125_JLM

OF THE TERRIBLE AND CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF THE OATH OF OUR MAGISTRATES SHOWED WITH Pierre MAUDET’S ANSWER, WHO REFUSES TO RESPECT THE RESOLUTION OF THE PARLIAMENT

By refusing to respect the resolution of the Parliament which asks him to resign, while he confirmed having lied, Pierre Maudet shows that the people has no possibility to take an immediate curative measure, if a magistrate violates his Oath with lies.

Further, Pierre MAUDET showed that every magistrate, who violates his Oath with lies, knows that the people has no possibility to take an immediate curative measure to prevent him from continuing to make an abuse of power.

Pierre MAUDET shows, for example, that an immoral Magistrate, who would commit acts of abuse of power by violating its Oath with lies, has the power to oppress our people or citizens, without the latter have the possibility to take an immediate curative measure to end his acts of abuse of power

He shows that every immoral magistrate knows that the legislator did not plan an immediate curative measure to neutralize a magistrate who does not deserve any more the confidence of the people for having lied and violated his Oath.

OF THE PROJECT OF INITIATIVE OF “THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES”

See initiative project : LSSEMP_19

This bill aims at giving to the people the means to take an immediate curative measure against a Magistrate or an elected representative who violates his Oath of loyalty to the people.

Such a law would not have allowed Pierre Maudet to refuse to respect the resolution of the Parliament which asks him to resign.

It would have even avoided to the Parliament to have to waste time to vote for this resolution, because the people would have had the means to take an immediate curative measure against Pierre MAUDET for violation of his Oath with lies.

As the Parliament, who wants to respect the people, showed his powerlessness to be able to take an immediate curative measure, this bill was transmitted to him.

The violation of Oath by immoral magistrates is one of engines of the corruption in Switzerland, it's time to end it with effective measures

See part : 190129DE_GC

Thanks to the Deputies of the Parliament of Geneva, who made publicly a commitment to respect the people in front of Magistrates who violate their Oath with lies

An example to be followed by the other members of parliament who apply the Code of silence on the violations of Oath with lies by magistrates.

190125_JLM

190129DE_GC

TJ de 19h30

LSSEMP_19

Hanspeter USTER, a survivor of the Zug killing, called in reinforcement to break the CODE of SILENCE

Me de Rougemont had received a mandate from the Vaud Parliament to break the CODE of SILENCE that provoked the killing of Zug to avoid another killing

He could not complete his mission following the intervention of a former President of the Federal Court, who enjoys the protection of the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office (MPC)

181030DE_VP

Hanspeter USTER , Chairman of Supervisory Authority of the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office (MPC), has been called as reinforcements to complete the mission of Me de ROUGEMONT and break forever this CODE of SILENCE

Hanspeter USTER
Lawyer
Survivor of the Killing of Zug President of the Supervisory Authority of the MPC

Me de ROUGEMONT had his mission sabotaged by Claude ROUILLER, the former President of the Federal Court.

Hanspeter USTER, who is a survivor of the killing, is the man of the situation to complete the mission of Me de Rougemont.

Two requests were sent to him.

190122DE_HU

Me François de ROUGEMONT has been mandate to process the parliamentary investigation request,  that found the violation of fundamental rights with the relations that bind members of lawyers' brotherhoods to the Courts.

Request of Parliamentary Investigation : 051217DP_GC

In this context, Me François de ROUGEMONT explained that he was appointed after the Zug killing by Parliament to avoid a new killing.

He explained that it was the corrective measure taken by the Vaud Authorities to ensure respect for the fundamental rights

He explained how the CODE of SILENCE applied by the Zug authorities had provoked this killing of 14 elected officials

He had the mission for avoiding a new killing to break the CODE of SILENCE and he undertook to answer all questions accurately, without doublespeak.

He kept his word in this context of the processing of the request for a parliamentary investigation. He immediately confirmed that there was a violation of the fundamental rights with the interventions of the President of the bar, which allowed a managing President, member of a fraternity of lawyers, to violate copyright with full impunity

He was unable to complete his mission because he has been removed from the case.

The case was taken over by the former President of the Federal Court, Claude ROUILLER.

Claude ROUILLER simply denied the violation of fundamental rights by obscuring the facts established with Me de ROUGEMONT. He imposed the same CODE of SILENCE which had provoked Zug’s killing.

The Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office (MPC) is currently considering the case. The latter knows that Me de ROUGEMONT could not complete his mission. The MPC applies the CODE of SILENCE too.

FINDING : The Grand Council’s corrective measure to prevent further killing is not working.

REQUIRED INTERVENTION OF A SURVIVOR OF ZUG KILLING

The mission of Me De ROUGEMONT must be resumed and completed with more effective measures. These measures must take into account the CODE of SILENCE imposed by the former President of the Federal Court with the protections granted to him by the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office (MPC).

Hanspeter USTER, a survivor of the Zug killing, is asked to take these steps and to support the initiative project for :

"THE LAW ON THE SUPERVISION OF OATHS OF ELECTED OFFICIALS AND MAGISTRATES BY THE PEOPLE WITH CURATIVE MEASURES"

That is the corrective action that Parliament should have put in place to avoid the killing of Zug and the sabotage of the mission of Me De Rougemont by a former President of the Federal Court.

LSSEMP_19

190122DE_HU

LSSEMP_19

A clash of Titans involving two of the highest judicial authorities in the Canton of Freiburg, one of them is Dr Adrian URWYLER and the other is Dr Adrian URWYLER

Président of the State Court
(= Dr Urwyler in red)

President of the Judicial Council
(= Dr Urwyler in green)

Dr. Adrian Urwyler resigned by March 1, 2019.

He was one of the authors of the codes of procedure that serve to paralyze the entire judicial system by allowing the Judges to violate their Oath of Magistrate with full impunity.

These codes of crazy procedures provide a means for immoral high magistrates to impose the Code of Silence on organized crime by preventing to address the substantives issues.

See HEBDO article on the paralysis of justice of April 7th, 2016

AS PRESIDENT OF THE STATE COURT, HE GIVES A FINAL DEMONSTRATION OF HOW HIS CODE OF PROCEDURE ALLOWS IMMORAL JUDGES TO ENFORCE THE CODE OF SILENCE ON THE ORGANIZED CRIME.

It will be the heavy task for Dr Urwyler (in green) to act against Dr Urwyler (in red) who paralyzed all justice....

Citizens from Freiburg State are seriously concerned that their taxes are being used to finance immoral high magistrates who violate their Oath to respect fundamental rights.

Will Dr Adrian URWYLER (in green) be able to break the Code of Silence that Dr Adrian URWYLER (in red) has imposed with his code of crazy procedures ?

We remind that by definition :

"The Oath of an elected representative or a Magistrate is the contract by which he gives a personal undertaking to use the power that the people grant him or her to carry out his or her duty as an elected representative and magistrate in a loyal way to all citizent"

« THE IMPOSITION OF THE CODE OF SILENCE » IS THE MEANS USED BY IMMORAL MAGISTRATES TO VIOLATE AN OATH WITH FULL IMPUNITY

We remind that by definition:

"OMERTA, also known as the CODE OF SILENCE, is the Law of criminal organizations."
It is the means used by members of corrupt elites, including immoral magistrates, who abuse of their power, to give disloyal benefits to members of brotherhoods and secret societies.

LAST DEMONSTRATION OF THE PARALYSIS OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM MADE BY Dr ADRIAN URWYLER, PRESIDENT OF THE STATE COURT, WITH HIS CODE OF PROCEDURE WHICH ALLOWS TO IMPOSE THE OMERTA ON THE DISLOYAL ADVANTAGES GRANTED TO MEMBERS OF THE BROTHERHOODS.

Act nr 1 (November 2018): 181125DE_TC

Dr Adrian URWYLER knows that he is the subject of a criminal complaint, after having acknowledged that the code of procedure was not applicable in this context where he gave disloyal benefits to members of the brotherhoods of lawyers by abusing of his power.
All his colleagues know the situation.

Act nr 2 (December 2018): 190104DE_VS

The code of procedure which does not allow to take into account the disloyal benefits accorded By Dr Adrian URWYLER  to members of brotherhoords is, however, still applied by Virginie Sonney.

Act nr 3 (January 2019): 190104DE_TC

The situation is notified to all State Court JUDGES. The President of the State Court, Dr Adrian URWYLER, knows that he is a stakeholder and that he cannot answer in the names of all his colleagues, without violating his Oath of Magistrate.

Act nr 4 (January 2019): 190107AU_DE

Dr Adrian URWYLER violates his Oath of Magistrate by responding on behalf of his colleagues, to demonstrate that his code of procedure allows to impose the Code of Silence on the disloyal benefits he has granted to members of brotherhoods of lawyers with full impunity.

He specifies that there is the Judicial Council, which is the supervising authority for judges. He suggests that it is this Authority, whose Chairman is Dr Adrian URWYLER, which can address this substantive issue of disloyal benefits granted to members of lawyers' brotherhoods by him. He indeed acknowledged that his code of procedure is not applicable because it allows to give disloyal benefits to members of brotherhoods by violating access to neutral and independent Courts.

Act nr 5 (January): 190113DE_TC

Dr Adrian Urwyler has been notified that he has violated his Oath in an immoral manner

Act nr 6 (January):

190114DE_TC

LDr Adrian Urwyler’s colleagues are invited to pronounce on the actions of their President without violating their Oath of Magistrates.

190114DE_CM

The Judicial Council, whose President is Dr Adrian URWYLER (in green), magistrate above all suspicion, has been recourse to break the Code of Silence imposed by Dr Adrian URWYLER (in red) with the code of crazy procedures to give disloyal advantages to the brotherhoods. We remind that Dr Adrian URWYLER is one of the authors of this code of procedures.

Hebdo 7.04.16

181030DE_VP

181125DE_TC

190104DE_VS

190104DE_TC

190107AU_DE

190113DE_TC

190114DE_TC

190114DE_CM

Dr Adrian URWYLER set an example by resigning

Dr Adrian URWYLER, President of the Tribunal and the Judicial Council of Freiburg, refused to break the Code of Silence on the violation of his Oath to respect the Fundamental Rights in order to grant benefits to members of brotherhoods of lawyers, but he resigned !

Pierre MAUDET showed that the people no longer accept sworn magistrate, who violate their Oath. Therefore, we invite all the magistrates who violate their Oath, like Virginie SONNEY, to resign !

190104DE_VS

CHALLENGE FOR Roland MESOT

Roland MESOT
President of Fribourg
Parliament for 2019

It will certainly be the greatest challenge of Roland MESOT, our new President of the PARLIAMENT, to take measures so that the sworn officials who violate their Oath can no longer use the code of Silence to cover the violation of their Oath

190107DE_RM

Dr Adrian URWYLER leaves behind him a ravaged court system, contaminated by the establishment for several years of this culture of the violation by the magistrates of their Oath to respect the fundamental rights with strategies of lies and manipulation that he taught.

Impunity for this acts have been ensured by the code of Silence, which have magistrates the power to apply rather than to do their duty to answer legitimate basic questions. A technique of oaths violation, which Dr Adrian URWYLER also taught by giving the example in the above mentioned context.

For example, see below, dated February 7, 2018 :

« PUBLIC QUESTIONS TO THE Dr ADRIAN URWYLER, ONE OF THE AUTHORS OF THE CODES OF PROCEDURES

..questions that remained unanswered.... , and in parallel see the strategies of lies and manipulation, including the last example that was exposed to Maurice ROPRAZ, see below dated 21.11.18:

part : 181119DE_MR

After Dr Adrian URWYLER resigned, a magistrate like Virginie SONNEY has already taken over, as the following document shows it. Discover the"self-decision" process applied by Virginie Sonney to refuse to recuse herself for hiding that she is a stakeholder, see part:

190104DE_VS

=> she must also resign for violating her Oath of Respect the Fundamental Rights in order to give benefits to members of brotherhoods of lawyers 

Now that the process of violation of the Oath by using the Code of silence is known, it is essential that the members of the Fribourg Parliament, under the Presidency of Roland MESOT, take remedial actions for ending to this form of organized corruption that destroys our society

190107DE_RM

Maurice Ropraz, State Counsellor, lawyer, was also invited to take remedial actions to ensure the safety of victims of magistrates, who violate their Serment by imposing the Code of Silence:

190104DE_MR

Current Project of Initiative

The preservation of the sovereignty of our people against corrupt elites is also the challenge of every citizen

A project to launch an initiative for a law on the supervision of oaths of elected officials and magistrates by the people is in preparation

For citizens who want to be able to trust elected officials and sworn judges, it is time to act.

Members of corrupt elites must no longer be allowed to use the Code of Silence to violate their oath of magistrate or elected.

Sworn magistrates who violate their oaths must resign and be punished directly by the people

Take part in this initiative project to restore the sovereignty of our people who can no longer enforce the Values of their Constitution following the betrayal of corrupt elites

More information will soon be released on this site for this initiative project to stop the violation of the Values of our Constitution by corrupt elites.

Contact for the initiative project : swissaudit.one@gmail.com

181030DE_VP

190104DE_VS

190107DE_RM

190104DE_MR

Doris Leuthard
Future retired woman
Former Federal Councillor

She still has to break the Code OF THE SILENCE

For the curious, see: 181030DE_VP

She is the only person to have received this recording and to know it officially, at the exclusion of lawyers who have the full versions of it.

One of them wants to organize the intervention of a  "Maurice Bavaud" to end the violation of fundamental rights by sworn Magistrates.

She will be contacted in due time to break the law of Silence on the violation of the Values of the Constitution by elected officials and sworn magistrates who violate their duty as elected officials and magistrates.

181231DE_DL

To end impunity of sworn magistrates and elected officials who use lies strategies and manipulation strategies to deceive the people :

Supervision of the Oaths of the elected officials and magistrates must be done from now on by the people.

Supervision of the Oaths of the elected officials and Magistrates must be done by the people (launch of a initiative)

" Zero tolerance by the people for elected and sworn magistrates who use the Law of Silence to violate the Values of the Constitution"

"Let us use social networks, like are doing the yellow vests, to bring together citizens, who want that sworn elected officials and magistrate have to respect the Values of the Constitution, and cannot anymore violate their Oath in full impunity

It is to the well-being of the weakest of the members of a Country that we measure the respect of the Values of the Constitution and not with the well-being and salary of a Bank Director.

Thank you also to all those who act in the shade to fight against the dishonesty of some of our politicians and members of our Authorities!

Thank you in particular to those who allow the publication of this site !

Thank to all providers and social networks who fight against censhorship in the Media.

Sohn von Tell

Dominique de BUMAN,

President of the Federal Assembly, had committed at the beginning of his mandate to enforce the Values of the Constitution by referring to Nicolas de Flüe.

He made a personal commitment to bridge the gap between Parliament and the people.

This commitment allowed him to show that members of Parliament forced the members of the Supervisory Commissions to impose the code of Silence on the Violation of the Values of the Constitution by High Sworn Magistrates!

Dominique de BUMAN has in fact shown that the members of the Parliamentary Supervisory Commissions do not have the necessary independence to ensure that the sworn Magistrates respect their Oath to enforce the Values of the Constitution.

To that end, Dominique de BUMAN also established de facto the following result :

Thanks to Dominique de BUMAN for showing that many of our elected representatives use the Law of Silence to work against the interests of the Population !

Thanks to Dominique de BUMAN, for his explanations on the law of Silence, for helping to understand the notion of «INITIÉ» used by the Lawyer of the "GER". Speaking about the law of Silence, he said in 2016:

"Zug’s killer was an "INSIDER" and he did what he had to do"

It is up to everyone to draw his conclusions on the meaning of the word «INITIATED» with the explanations of Dominique de BUMAN....

Thanks also to Pierre MAUDET for showing that a sworn magistrate who uses lies and manipulation strategies loses the trust of the people!

Sohn von Tell

Alessandro Pelizzari, the sociologist, trade unionist UNIA, Swiss, observes that :

It’s time for Fear to change of Camp in France

Source Interview RTS /19h30
4.12.2018

Alessandro PELIZZARI
Sociologist
Trade unionist UNIA

Financials, including MACRON, play with fear of dismissal to impose their economic models

Yellow vests have shown that they can also create a climate of fear against those who do not respect human dignity. It’s a beautiful Christmas message!

Alessandro Pelizzari observes that social conflictuality is less visible in Switzerland because conflicts are atomized.

It is time for fear to change of Camp in Switzerland for our elected and sworn magistrates, who violate the rights of weak defenceless citizens by abusing of their Authority

Yellow vests have shown that social networks can help to combat censorship and manipulation of facts.

Pierre MAUDET Example

Pierre MAUDET showed that in atomized conflicts, fear will change of Camp, when sworn members of authorities, elected or magistrates, can no longer violate their Oath to respect the Values of the Constitution with impunity !

The petition, launch to make Pierre MAUDET resigning, shows the power of social networks :

Petition reminder: Pierre MAUDET must resign!

Click here to sign

This is the finest Christmas present which a sworn magistrate could give to the Swiss, as Pierre Maudet did it by showing that the application of lies strategies and manipulation has an Achiles’ heel :

it is the transparency of social networks

The fight against the use of the code of Silence used by magistrate to cover strategies of lies and manipulation is now possible with social networks :

Simonetta Sommaruga, who put her family in danger by enforcing the code of Silence, knows that Fear is changing from Camp

see part : 181205DE_LH

See part 181212DE_CB

The President of PARLIAMENT, as an EPFL engineer, was made aware of the situation.

See part : 181216DE_RJ

The EPFL differentiates itself from other Schools with the Oath of Archimedes. This Oath reminds the Values of Ethics and the responsibility of engineers to enforce the fundamental human rights and to preserve the quality of Life. Speaking to the EPFL engineer, who is the President of the Parliament, means referring to these Values that former students must preserves.

See Archimèdes OATH

Rémy JAQUIER
EPFL Engineer
Vaud Parliament President

If the President of Parliament discovers that Parliament is financing with our taxes a Sworn Lawyer to commit organized crime in his own name and in the name of other elected officials, he will be able to show that EPFL engineers do not accept that Sworn Lawyers abuse of their power with strategies of lies and manipulation like Pierre MAUDET.

It was the familiarization with the request for the parliamentary investigation with the actions of the president, Christian BETTEX, quoted in that request of investigation, which provoked the reaction of this parliamentarian.
He discovered and understood why Me Bettex wanted to prevent Me Schaller from defending his client:

For more details, see part: 181030DE_VP

Of the violation of the Oath of Elected Officials to Respect the Federal Constitution by the Sworn Lawyer acting on their behalf
This parliamentarian immediately understood why the actions of this Sworn Lawyer violate the Oath of Parliamentarians to Respect the Values of the Constitutionn.

He claims he never gave a power of attorney for such acts. Besides, he would never have given it if this Sworn Lawyer had asked for it  !

Verification of the existence of the Power of Attorney with the Sworn Lawyer who claims to have been mandated by the elected officials
Christian BETTEX has been asked to prove the existence of this Power of Attorney given by all the elected officials
See part : 181212DE_CB

Of the verification of the existence the Power of Attorney, which everyone can do by interviewing the parlemtarians

Everyone can also make the exercise of contacting the 150 Members of Parliament. Here is the list :

Parlementarians list

Everyone can ask them to confirm that their Sworn Attorney, Christian BETTEX, made them well aware of the reasons why he claimed to have a power of attorney to represent them validly.

Everyone can require from these elected representatives to confirm that they granted this Power of Attormey to their sworn lawyer, knowing that he was acting as a party and that he made them violating their Parliamentarian Oath to respect the Values of the Constitution.

Of the verification of the information provided by Bettex to elected officials in order to obtain his power of attorney
Everyone should check with the Parliamentarians, that in order to obtain his Power of Attorney in a loyal way, Me Bettex has made them aware of the content of the request for parliamentary investigation, which shows the violation of Fundamental Rights with the relations linking his Brotherhood of Lawyers to the Courts.

See part : 051217DP_GC

Anyone can ask parliamentarians to confirm that Mr. Bettex has informed them that he is the President of the bar, in this request for a parliamentary investigation, who prevented the principal witness from testifying. Anyone can ask the elected officials to confirm that Bettex made them pay close attention to Mr Schaller’s reaction, quote :

"Me Schaller déclare ce courrier du Bâtonnier comme sans valeur. Il demande au Juge qu'il fasse témoigner Me Bumet. Le Juge ne le fait pas. Me Schaller demande alors que le Juge porte plainte contre l'Ordre des avocats pour entrave à la Justice. Il souligne que l'Ordre des avocats réduit le pouvoir du Juge. Le juge ne le voudra pas"

All readers of the site will appreciate that Me Christian BETTEX cannot at once,  as President of the Bar, violate the right of Me Schaller to make a witness testify for exonerating his client,..... , and at the same time, acting as Sworn Layer of the Parliament, violate the Right of Me Schaller to be able to defend this client he has deprived of the Right to be cleared by his actions as President of the Bar !

181216DE_RJ

Serment_Ing

181212DE_CB

181030DE_VP

deputies_list

051217DP_GC

Two years ago, a dissenting lawyer said that there would have to be deaths to get that political authorities put in place control systems to ensure that fundamental rights are respected in all areas.

Today his prediction has been confirmed, and EPFL engineers can no longer recognise their values in the actions of these brigands' elites

Jacques ESSINGER
Ing. Physicien EPFL
CEO DE SYMETIS

Following the scandal of defective implants involving Swiss personalities, Jacques ESSINGER, an EFPL engineer, explains that EPFL engineers no longer recognize their values in these scandals committed by brigands

See RTS-Play /2.12.2018

This is just the tip of the iceberg in one area !

The President of the Vaud Big Council, Rémy Jaquier, an EPFL graduate, has the same problem with Christian BETTEX.  This latter pretends to be the Sworn Lawyer representing all the elected members of the Big Council

After a check, it appears that Christian BETTEX is applying a RIGHT which does not exist on behalf of all elected officials in order to give benefits to the members of his brotherhood.

After that Pierre MAUDET violated his oath to respect the values of the Constitution in order to obtain personal benefits by applying the law of SILENCE, the political authorities must face a much more serious scandal:

It is their own lawyer, Christian BETTEX, who acts in the name of this elected officials without their knowledge and their approval. The reason is simple, he is violating the Oath of the elected officials to enforce the fundamental Rights guaranteed by the Constitution for applying the law of silence on organized crime committed by members of his brotherhood.

See mail of November 6, 2018, addressed to EPFL Graduate President : 181106DE_RJ

See response from Christian BETTEX, the Sworn Lawyer claiming to represent all elected officials :181204CB_DE

Discover the power of attorney shown by Christian BETTEX to be able to say, quote:

I am the Sworn Lawyer representing all members of the Big Council.
See part : 181212DE_CB

How many deaths will be needed, among elected officials, before the Federal Council decide to put in place a monitoring system to ensure that fundamental rights are respected by Sworn Citizens in their decision ?

Rémy JAQUIER has the keys to act !

He has already to check and ensure that each elected official has granted Mr. Christian BETTEX the power of attorney to act on his behalf !

181106DE_RJ

181204CB_DE

181212DE_CB

181030DE_VP

RTS PLAY_1

RTS-Play_2

Writer Lukas HARTMANN, who had supported the repair initiative, is made aware of the difficulties encountered with Simonetta SOMMARUGA, who enforces the SILENCE law.

Lukas Hartmann
Simonetta SOMARUG's Husband
Committed Writer

He may be able to convince Simonetta SOMARUGA to resign for ending the use of the law of the silence. See part :

181205DE_LH

For those who want judges and elected officials of integrity who do not violate their Oath to Respect the Values of the Constitution, thank you for signing these two petitionss

Petition nr 1 :

Pierre MAUDET doit démissionner

Click here to sign

Pétition no 2 :

Creation of citizen juries to end abuse of judicial authorities

Click here to sign

a draft of initiative for Petition Nr. 2 is under review

And in the knowledge that only those who use their freedom remain free, and that the strength of a people is measured by the well-being of its weakest members ( Constitution preamble) :

A gathering of the Swiss yellow vests to Jurablick 65, in Spiegel, at Simonetta SOMMARUGA's place of residence, with a lasting days camp to handle the theme of the law of silence, is also an action which is in discussion to sound the knell for the magistrates who apply the law of silence

181205DE_LH

181122DE_SS

181114DE_SS

181030DE_VP

Pétition no 1

Pétition no 2

Pierre Maudet
Minister of Justice of Geneva
taking the oath to respect
the Values of the Constitution

"If an elected representative or a magistrate violates his oath to respect the Values of the Constitution, he has to resign."

It is the experience which lives Pierre MAUDET for having violated his OATH to respect the Values of the Constitution with lies.

See television news of 7:30 pm of Tuesday, November 27th of the RTS

RTS-Replay

See also :

181128_TDG

Pierre MAUDET is not the first elected representative, nor the first Magistrate of the Justice, who violates his Oath to respect the Values of the Constitution with lies

He is however the first elected representative and the first Magistrate who asserts that if the Genevan Justice can clear him with a procedure, then he will not have violated his Oath to respect the Values of the Constitution:

« For Pierre MAUDET, the elected representative or the magistrate violating his Oath to respect the Values of the Constitution with lies, who manages to be cleared by the justice, must be considered trustworthy by the people »

THE PEOPLE REMIND TO PIERRE MAUDE THAT AN OATH IS SACRED AND THAT NO LEGAL PROCEEDING ALLOWS TO RESTORE THE CONFIDENCE IF AN OATH WAS VIOLATED WITH LIES. IT IS MANIPULATOR’S REASONING WHICH IS NOT ACCEPTABLE FROM A SWORN MAGISTRATE :
HE HAS TO RESIGN !

With an on-line petition the people demand the resignation of Pierre MAUDET, further to that no judgment can erase the violation of the Values of the Constitution with lies.

See 181128_TDG

After a few hours the petition was already signed by more than 4000 citizens. After two days more than 12 000 citizens have signed it. See petition : Resignation of Pierre MAUDET

BUT THERE ARE STILL MAGISTRATES WHO VIOLATE IN A MUCH GRAVER WAY THEIR OATH TO RESPECT THE VALUES OF THE CONSTITUTION, AS THE RAPISTS OF THE CHILDREN OR THE RAPISTS OF THE RIGHTS OF DEFENCELESS CITIZEN, BY APPLYING A FAKE LAW FOR ABUSING OF THEIR POWER OF MAGISTRATES :

See part : 181030DE_VP

Among them, there is Adrian URWYLER, President of council of the Judiciary, whose resignation was required from the Big Council of Fribourg !

See Part : 181128DE_GC

181128DE_GC

181030DE_VP

181125DE_TC

181125DE_TF

Pétition

HE CHOOSES THE STRATEGY OF THE EXCUSE WITHOUT MANIPULATING THE FACTS, RATHER TO FOLLOW THE EXAMPLE OF THE CHIEF OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF FRIBOURG, WHO HAS CHOOSEN THE STRATEGY OF LYING AND MANIPULATING TO PROTECT MEMBERS OF CRIMINAL ORGANISATION

Philippe REBORD
Swiss Army Chief

The ethics of the Swiss Army chief is safe,...

.... while a criminal complaint was lodged against Adrian URWYLER, the Chief of the Judicial Council of Fribourg, who has choosen to have the behaviour and the ethics of a war criminal !

The law on the transparency showed excessive expenses made by high-ranking officers, which means unfair behaviour from Leaders who have to give the example:
See News Broadcast of 7:30 pm of Nov. 12th, 2018, RTS_replay

IMMEDIATE REACTION OF THE SWISS ARMY CHIEF : the facts are admitted and he apologizes to the people

To see excuses of Philippe Rebord on November 17 th 2018

OPPOSITE BEHAVIOUR OF THE CHIEF OF The JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF FRIBOURG:

...not only he does not apologize, in spite of the proof established by a Professional of the law of his abuse of authority, but he continues to make an excessive use of his power to violate in a grime way the fundamental rights. Indeed:

A lawyer revealed that LAW, inaccessible to the public, who says : "It is requested to have an authorization of the President of the BAR for lodging a penal complaint against a Director of a company, who violates the Copyright, when he is a member of a brotherhood of lawyers", does not exist !!!

It is an outlawed means, used by the High Magistrates of the Justice to prevent the instruction of breaches committed by members of brotherhoods of lawyers.
In particular, he specified that the Chief of the Judicial Council of Fribourg, Adrian URWYLER, knew it!

REACTION OF THE CHIEF OF THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF FRIBOURG:
As Pierre MAUDET, Adrian URWYLER applies a strategy of lies and manipulation of the facts which makes shudder to cover these acts of abuse of authority involving High Magistrates of the Swiss Justice.

See part: 181116DE_VS

and the complaint letter, 181119DE_MR, with the Title:

Monsieur le Ministre de notre Justice : quelles mesures allez-vous prendre pour faire respecter les droits fondamentaux garantis par la Constitution, violés avec les crimes de guerre économique que commettent des Magistrats de notre Justice en appliquant des stratégies de mensonges et manipulation 

which has been sent to the Freibourg State Councillor Maurice ROPRAZ. Let us hope that he will not keep silent, but will follow the lesson of ethics of Philippe REBORD !

181030DE_VP

181116DE_VS

181119DE_MR

Magnificent lesson of ethics of a Force of police inspectors from the criminal investigation, who made the Oath to respect the federal Constitution and the fundamental rights of the citizens. To honour this Serment they refuse to obey to a Chief who uses a strategy of lying and manipulating which is not compatible with confidence and respect of the Values of the Constitution.

See TV News of 18H30 from November 3 rd, 2018

Pierre MAUDET
Minister of Justice
of Geneva State,
who betrayer his Oath to respect the federal Constitution

The labour union of Police reminds that their first duty is to enforce the Constitution. Their role is not to work for MINISTER OF JUSTICE WHO DOES NOT SHARE THESE VALUES, but who uses the strategy of lying and of manipulating.

.

THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE of the State of Geneva forgot that we are sovereign people.

He forgot that the leading role of a Minister and a Magistrate is to apply and to enforce the Values of our Constitution.

He forgot that every police inspector from the criminal investigation made the Oath to respect the Values of the federal Constitution.

He forgot that his role of Minister of Justice is to be the servant of all the citizens who elected him to enforce the Values of their Constitution.

Of the historic importance of the decision of 101 inspectors of the Criminal Investigation Department to refuse to obey to a magistrate, Minister of Justice, who uses a the strategy of lying and manipulating :

In 1918, Switzerland was on the brink of a civil war further to that the Authorities did not want to enforce the fundamental rights of the weakest citizens guaranteed by the Constitution.

At that time, there was no deceit made by senior magistrates. It was a balance of power. The Committee of Olten found the necessary strength with the organization of the general strike of Olten to enforce the Values of the Constitution.

Today, if we look at the behaviour of Pierre MAUDET, nothing has changed, except that the senior magistrates use now the strategy of lying and manipulating to violate the Values of our Constitution.

The decision of the judicial Force of police inspectors of Geneva, to refuse to obey to a Minister of Justice who lies, is as important as the General Strike organized by the Committee of OLTEN to enforce the Values of our Constitution.

This lesson of ethics of the judicial Force of Police should incite our SWISS MINISTER OF JUSTICE, Simonetta Sommaruga, to make condemn in an exemplary way the senior magistrates and the elected representatives who are using a "Fake LAW" to assure  the impunity of members of corrupt elites, who as Pierre Maudet, have too much power.

An official request has been sent to Simonetta Sommaruga to enforce the federal Constitution and to take example on the actions made by the Commitee of Olten or the writer "Lukas Hartmann" to protect the fundamental rights of the weakest citizens, see :

181114DE_SS

Ethic Lesson

181114DE_SS

181030DE_VP

181020DE_ML

In both cases the fundamental rights of their customers are violated. In Switzerland, the customer is deprived of the human right to be defended by his lawyer, while in Pakistan the lawyer defending the customer has to flee the country to save his life.

Me SAIF UL MULOOK
Lawyer of ASIA BIBI
In Pakistan

This lawyer is not deprived of the right to defend his customer by the Authorities although they do not want to respect human rights!

But he had to flee in Holland for his safety and to mobilize the International opinion, see part :

181106DE_RJ

ASIABIBI

Of each to appreciate that on an ethical point of view, the federal Council uses a process of traitor and that the score published by Transparency International has no Value !

Presentation below of the process of traitor, used in Switzerland by ruling elites to violate the human rights, which knows well Alain Berset, President of the Confederacy.
Of each to assess it from an ethical point of view:

In Pakistan :
Lawyers can defend their customer and prove the violation of human rights. Their work is of no use. Their customers have their fundamental rights infringed further to that the Islamist elites, who manage the country, do not respect human rights.
Lawyers have to flee the country for their safety, further to the violation of the fundamental rights of their customers by the Authorities. Abroad, they can nevertheless mobilize the international opinion.

See case ASIABIBI

The transparency on the respect of the rights of the lawyers to defend their customers by the authorities gives a bad score with Transparency International for the respect of the Human rights of the lawyer customers by the Authorities

In Switzerland :
Lawyers are deprived of the right to defend their customer by the Authorities to prove the violation of human rights. Their customers have their fundamental rights infringed, as in Pakistan, following what ruling elites at the head of the country do not respect human rights.
Lawyers censored by the Authorities cannot mobilized the international opinion. They do not need to flee from their country for their safety as they are censored and cannot reveal the violation of the fundamental rights of their customers.

See case BETTEX

The absence of transparency, on the violation of the rights of the lawyers to defend the fundamental rights of their customers by the ruling elites, gives a wrongly good score with Transparency International for the Human rights respect by the Authorities due to the censorhip of the lawyer.

On an ethical point of view, we can hope that in Switzerland, elected representatives who are different of the ruling elites, alerted by the existence of this process of traitor used by ruling elites to hide the violation of human rights, are going to end it!

181106DE_RJ

181106DE_RJ

ASIABIBI

It is not because we are a high magistrate that we can violate the rules of the good faith with a report containing misleading figures

Dr Philippe Eggimann
President of the Medical Society
of french-speaking Switzerland

Dr Eggimann has the opportunity that his RIGHT to be heard couldn’t be violated by high magistrates with a misleading report. He gives a beautiful lesson of ethics to Alain Berset who is also valid for the misleading report made by Me Claude Rouiller

He shows that the silence of the President of the Confederacy on the deliberately vitiated report of Claude ROUILLER would not be acceptable for the members of the society of medicine.

For the members of the SVM, the high magistrates do not have the right to resort to studies containing misleading figures to cover dysfunctions of the Authorities.

The President of the Confederacy is made aware that a lawyer has just explained that the condition imposed by the Bar association to block the legal action is not a LAW, but an outlaw way used by the members of brotherhoods to obtain the prescription on their crimes.

In view of this new fact and of the lesson of ethics of Dr Eggimann, it is requested from Alain BERSET, President of the Confederacy, that he enforces the federal Constitutione

The criminal complaint filed against the Bar association, further to this LAW which does not exist, is sent to him for action.

181031DE_AB

181020DE_ML

It has been also requested from Dominique de BUMAN, President of the Parliament, to enforce the federal Constitution with the file of this criminal complaint delivered personally by hand to him

181025DE_DB

181031DE_AB

181025DE_DB

181020DE_ML

The conditions imposed by the Presidents of the bar are not a LAW. It is the reason why we cannot find them in the codes of procedures.

This lawyer explains that the crimes, committed with these conditions imposed by the Bar association to the Courts, are imprescriptible!

A criminal complaint was filed against the Bar association further to the interventions of the Presidents of the bar, Philippe Richard, Yves BURNAND, Christian BETTEX, Claude ROUILLER, Philippe BAUER, etc.

Me Christian BETTEX
Former President of the Bar
State Lawyer
Parliament Lawyer

The former President of the bar, Christian BETTEX, had explained that the conditions imposed by the Bar association to hinder the President of the Court, Bertrand SAUTEREL, of questioning a key witness, have allowed the members of the bar association to violate the constitutional fundamental rights

He omitted to say that these conditions imposed by himself were not a LAW and that the crimes committed with these conditions imposed to the Courts are imprescriptible !

A lawyer questioned about the limitation periods for the conditions imposed by the Presidents of the bar to block the legal action against their members, as the authorization request of the President of the bar to lodge a complaint against their members, completes the explanations of Me of ROUGEMONT.
He asserts that :

« The authorization request to be obtained from the President of the bar to be able to lodge a penal complaint against a PDG who violates the copyright, if he is a member of the bar association, does not exist in the LAW »

After having acquainted with the request of parliamentary inquiry which gives evidence of its existence, he observes that it is a way outside the LAW used by the members of bar association to obtain the prescription !

See content of the request of parliamentary inquiry, top of page 3: 051217DP_GC

In the case described by the request of parliamentary inquiry, he confirms that there is violation of the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution.

He specifies that the notion of limitation period has no sense, because the codes of procedures do not allow to manage the cases.

It is an imprescriptible case : the Bar association cannot hinder the legal action with conditions imposed to the Courts to obtain the prescription and then to take advantage of the prescription in this given context !

If these conditions imposed by the Bar association are not in the codes of procedures available for  the public, it is simply because they do not exist in LAW !

The silence of the elected representatives of our people on the violation of the fundamental rights, with these conditions imposed by the Bar association, takes a new dimension which reminds the Carpostal case.

We remind that for the case of Carpostal, national Councillors wanted that there is no prescription.

This time, it is even a lawyer who observes that it is an imprescriptible case, which shows the existence of a corrupt elite.

He explained that the Bar association, with its conditions imposed to the Courts to hinder legal action, violates the article 5 of the federal Constitution.

"Article 5 : the LAW is the base and the limit of the activity of the State"

A criminal complaint was filed against the bar association and the magistrates implicated in this case with the requirement of the access to neutral and independent Courts of the bar association.

181020DE_ML

051217DP_GC

181020DE_ML

181010DE_PM

181016DE_NG

Comments made by Me de ROUGEMONT, appointed by the vaudois Parliament, for the case presented here :

"THE COURTS ARE NOT COMPETENT TO HANDLE THIS CASE, BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT INDEPENDENT OF THE BAR ASSOCIATION"

WHO IS COMPETENT TO ENFORCE THE GUARANTEED FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION HERE ?

Nuria GORRITE
President of the State Council
of Vaud

She has certainly the power to do it or to find solutions!

The principle of separation of power applied correctly gives the competence to the other powers that the one of the justice to take corrective actions to assure the respect of the Values of the Constitution

Transparency is finally given on this unfailing method

They have invented the simple solution!

Disclosure of the method in two points:

Point 1 : During his last intervention in an audience of witnesses, the defence counsel explains to the President of the Court what a (fictitious) witness should have said, for example: (yadda… yadda)

Point 2 : The President of the Court notes then in his judgment with the standard formula : a witness, (for whom the judge has omitted the name in the judgment), said:  (yadda … yadda)

It's already over : It appears in the judgment witnesses audition report, the testimony (yadda … yadda) of a witness who has never existed and for whom the name is not quoted !

Explanations of a lawyer on the infallibility of this method:

Point A : The code of procedure does not allow the complainant counsel to dispute the registration of the testimony (yadda … yadda) by the President of the Court in its judgment

Point B :If the complainant counsel disputes this testimony by a mail (of clarification) sent to the President, the code of procedure allows the President to return him this mail so that the mail does not appear in the Court file.

Point C: If the complainant counsel wants to call upon this mail (of clarification) in a trial, the code of procedure does not allow him to do it.

Demonstration made by the lawyer Diego-Bischof with as President of the Court: Sir de Montmollin

In the case presented here, Diego Bischof shows how this method allowed him to introduce in the judgment the testimony of a (fictitious) witness who said that a CD containing a digital application cost 90 000 CHF, while its contractual price was 40 000 CHF.

For those who did not know this method applied by members of the Bar association,  to discover here the case presented to Mrs Nuria GORRITE : 181016DE_NG

To read on pages 8 and 9 comments quoted by 6 judges. They are brilliant! They explain that the codes of procedures allow them to make tell anything to witnesses auditioned in Court!

These judges confirm in this example that the Courts are not competent to enforce the fundamental rights as has already said it Me de ROUGEMONT !

181016DE_NG

181010DE_PM

051217DP_GC

Me Cynthia FIVAZ
Lawyer of Vaud State Council
FSA MEDIATOR

The angelic smile which adore the members of brotherhoods of lawyers, but which is dangerous for the members of the syndicates who want the respect of their constitutional rights !

Did Pierre-Yves MAILLARD know the activities of influence peddling of this lawyer of the state Council, when he was President of council of State?

Did she act alone or did she only executed Pierre - Yves MAILLARD's orders, which would have encouraged her to violate) the federal Constitution?

Did she correctly inform Pierre-Yves MAILLARD about her activities, or did she deceive him ?

A story to make shiver behind the scenes of the Council of State.

181010DE_PM

Pierre-Yves MAILLARD was invited to clarify the situation.

If he is involved in this influence peddling to allow a corrupt elite to violate the rights of the other citizens, he will not be credible at the head of the Swiss Labour Union.

To wash his hands, Pierre-Yves MAILLARD absolutely has to pursue a process of confrontation between Me Claude ROUILLER, former federal judge, and Me Rudolf SCHALLER.

It is Claude ROUILLER's answers to questions asked on his report that will allow to establish the Truth.

See part : 180909DE_CR

051217DP_GC

181010DE_PM

180909DE_CR

The employees of UBS detected the dysfunction of the procedures and gave the alert in time

Sergio Ermotti
UBS CEO

It is now the responsibility of the CEO of UBS to take the adequate measures, so that the bank procedures have to assure the security of the financials assets of its customers as well as the respect of the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution

After the violation of the American Constitution with delirious procedures, the employees of UBS learned from defects of bank procedures put in evidence by Bradley Birkenfeld.

It is the Jackpot: they have just detected a doubtful Court ORDER:

De facto, it is members of brotherhoods of lawyers that use their privileges to finance some organized crime by using cunningly services of prosecution.

The chief of the Service of the prosecution, Bertrand TSCHANZ, was warned that he applies codes of procedures which are not applicables.

180929DE_BT

Sergio Ermotti, CEO of UBS, who has the responsibility to ensure that the Bank procedures assure the respect of the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution, was made aware of this swindle. 180929DE_SE

He knows that members of brotherhoods of lawyers, among them Me Foetisch, found the way to finance some organized crime by using cunningly the services of prosecution to make court order with documents established by not competent Courts. 051217DP_GC

It is almost as vicious as the procedures described by Bradley Birkenfeld to violate the Constitution

This time, the CEO of UBS is informed in time to end this violation of the federal Constitution with vicious and delirious procedures. 180929DE_SE

180929DE_SE

051217DP_GC

180929DE_BT

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF INNOCENT CITIZENS ARE VIOLATED IN a GRIME WAY BY PROSECUTORS

Wolfang WOHLERS, Professor penalist of the University of Basel trembles with indignation in front of the violation of innocents' fundamental rights by deceit

Wolfgang WOHLERS
Penalist Professeur
University of Basel

A report by the TSR, not to be missed

An intervention of the Swiss Conference of the Prosecutors was required:

It concerns the case of the VIOLATION OF the RIGHT TO BE HEARD BY NEUTRAL AND INDEPENDENT COURTS, of which his President Fabien GASSER is accused, in response to the considerations of right violation established by Me François de ROUGEMONT

180626DE_FG

A report of the RTS which shows that we are back in the time of the inquisition of the Middle Ages

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Meu7D3BODSc

OBSERVATION OF a PENALIST PROFESSOR
Trembling with indignation, Wolgang WOHLERS suggests to delete the RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT if the Prosecutors use it as pretext to violate innocents' fundamental rights by deceit with traps.

To note that: the General prosecutor justifies his deceit with traps and the violation of the fundamental rights of an innocent in the only purpose to try to establish the Truth, and without having the assurance to be able to establish it

THE GOLDEN PALM OF THE HORROR FOR THE VIOLATION OF THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF AN INNOCENT IS GIVEN TO the GENERAL PROSECUTOR FABIEN GASSER

While the Prosecution of Fribourg was involved in an case of violation of the access to neutral and independent Courts, established by the processing of a request of parliamentary inquiry.
While Me of ROUGEMONT had explained that the codes of procedures were not applicable in the given context.
While he is the President of the CPS, Prosecutor Fabien GASSER did not hesitate to violate THE RIGHT TO BE HEARD BY NEUTRAL AND INDEPENDENT COURTS to prevent the Truth from being established. His action aimed at allowing a criminal, member of a brotherhood, to escape justice.

OBSERVATION OF A PENALIST PROFESSOR
Prof. F. RIKLIN of the University of FRIBOURG had already given evidence of the violation of the fundamental rights in 2005 for this case. Fabien Gasser who knew it continues to violate the fundamental rights!

To note that contrary to the first Prosecutor, Fabien GASSER violates the fundamental rights to prevent the Truth from being established. He contradicts himself. In an interview given to Sébastien FAURE, he considered that a Prosecutor can violate the fundamental rights in case he wants to establish the Truth

See interview de Fabien Gasser

TO VIOLATE THE "RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT" for establishing the Truth is not the same thing as TO VIOLATE THE "RIGHT TO BE HEARD" for preventing the Truth to be established. Funny defintion of the Truth for Fabien GASSER !

It is the job of the CPS to give its observations on these substantive topics, where Prosecutors do not want to enforce the RULE OF LAW, see : 180626DE_FG

180626DE_FG

051217DP_GC

070116DP_FR

Editorial of the Newspaper: le MATIN par Eric FELLEY 13.09.2018

Oath to respect
the federal Constitution:

What meant this Oath for Christian MIESCH, NATIONAL COUNCILLOR ?

What means this oath for Simonetta SOMMARUGA, our Minister of Justice ?,

What means this Oath for Philippe BAUER, national Councillor, when he is in the skin of a President of the bar ?

Philippe SCHWAB has already revealed that the elected representatives planned in the law of the Parliament that they can keep silent when they are informed about dysfunction of our institutions.

When we open the Pandora's box, come out that our elected representatives planned the rule that: "the accused has the right to lie to defend itself, nothing of what he says can be retained against him". This rule allows every smart elected representative to violate its Oath to respect the federal Constitution. He just has to lie in a way that a prosecutor cannot prove the direct link between given advantages and counterparty received by the elected representative !

Do you know Philippe Bauer's hidden side, when he is acting in the skin of a President of the bar?
Do you know that he obtained from the federal Court advantages for the members of brotherhoods of lawyers which allow them to commit offences and crimes with complete impunity ?

Do you know that Me François de ROUGEMONT explained that there is no division of powers between brotherhood of lawyers and Courts. He concluded that there are no independent Courts to judge the crimes and the offences committed by members of brotherhoods of lawyers !

What is worth Philippe BAUER's oath to respect the federal Constitution, while he sets up advantages for the members of brotherhoods who allow them to manage disloyally the interests of our people.
Do you know how Philippe BAUER made break a judgment of Neuchâtel Court to allow his colleague, Me Foetisch, to escape the justice for his crimes ?

Discover three questions asked to our Minister of Justice, Simonetta SOMMARUGA, on the advantages that the Presidents of the bar obtained from the Parliament to allow the members of their brotherhoods to escape the justice !

Discover how a big Swiss bank asserts being forced to steal his customers to finance organized crime for members of brotherhoods, further to the advantages given by Phillippe Bauer to the members of its brotherhood.
The key issue: how Simonetta SOMMARUGA, who made the Oath to respect the federal Constitution, is she going to end these advantages ?

To discover Philippe BAUER's hidden side acting in the skin of a President of the bar: answer the three questions asked in the front page of the following document :

180917DE_SS

051217DP_GC

180917DE_SS

070116DP_FR

070329PB_TC

WE MUST REQUIRE FROM THE PROSECUTION TO INVESTIGATE INTO THE BENEFITS RECEIVED BY THE MAGISTRATES AS COMPENSATION FOR THE OFFERED ADVANTAGES:

article du 12 septembre 2018 :

FIRST TEST MADE WITH PASCAL BROULIS:

Pascal BROULIS
State Councillor of Vaud
Decision-maker for the tax-benefits
Very discreet on the financing of its journeys in Russia

To note that the Prosecution has to be independent, or, this egg of Colomb would have to be a new absolute farce!

To require from the Prosecution to investigate into the benefits received by magistrates as compensation for the advantages which they offer is an initiative to remedy with a stopgap measure to the failure or the absence of supervisory organ.

It would be more effective to set up supervisory organ to verify that the magistrates respect in their decision their Oath to apply the federal Constitution.

It would be essential to make sure that the legislator sets up simple and effective supervision systems for identifying influence peddling.

OF THE SLAP GIVEN BY ME PHILIPPE BAUER, NATIONAL COUNCILLOR, TO THE FEDERAL ASSEMBLY

Do you know that an authorization of the President of the bar is requested for filing a criminal complaint against a Chairman of the Board of a company who commits a criminal offence, in the case where he is a member of a brotherhood of lawyers? ?

Do you know that Me Philippe BAUER, as President of the bar, has explained that:  the Chairman of the Board of a company who commits a criminal offence, has just to ignore the summons of the President of the bar to prevent that the President of the Bar can give an authorization. If the President of the Bar don’t give the authorization, it is not possible to file a criminal complaint against him ? IN PRACTISE HE IS UNTOUCHABLE WITH THIS PRIVILEGE!

Do you know that it is an advantage offered by the legislator to the members of brotherhood? Do you know that this advantage is hidden to our people?

As a result the Egg of Colomb could be a new absolute farce if the Prosecution has its power reduced by the privileges which the members of brotherhoods have set up for them with the approval of the Parliament.

For the national Councillor Philippe BAUER, the Swiss Constitution is not the supreme law which is applicable to the members of brotherhoods. They have a hidden law which allows them to make some influence peddling "legalized by the Parliament of which he is a member ".

OF A SIMPLE AND EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVE MEASURE TO FIGHT AGAINST THE INFLUENCE PEDDLING AND THE DISLOYAL MANAGEMENT OF THE INTERESTS OF THE STATE BY MAGISTRATES:

Referring to the obligation of magistrate to respect the federal Constitution, it has been requested from the former federal Judge, Me Claude ROUILLER, to indicate where is written in the law these privileges used by the colleagues of Me Philippe BAUER to give advantages to third parties.

See part 180909DE_CR

051217DP_GC

070329PB_TC

180909DE_CR

article du 4 septembre 2018.:

The application laws to enforce the Constitution, set up by the Parliament, allow people in charge of a task of the State, as Pierre MAUDET or Philippe SCHWAB to violate the federal Constitution by making judge their offences by Prosecutors who are not independent.

Pierre MAUDET
State Council President, GE
Head of the Justice, GE
"accused" of influence peddling
Considered innocent

Philippe SCHWAB, General Secretary of the Parliament, as Pierre MAUDET are considered innocents while the facts on the substantive items give evidence that they are involved in influence peddling.

Their acts are investigated by prosecutors who are not independent, that is an absolute farce which allows to explain their choice to make some influence peddling

The General prosecutor of the Canton of Geneva depends on Pierre Maudet. He cannot be independent.

On the other hand, he is elected by the Geneve people. If he informs the people that he leads an investigation for influence peddling and lie against Pierre MAUDET, he has a certain life insurance not to be dismissed. Indeed those who will want to censor the investigation could provoke the anger of those who denounce this absolute farce, where the Prosecutor is not independent !

Seen the situation, it is important that all the citizens are informed about the substantive questions. They can so form their own opinion of the capacity of the Prosecutor to enforce the Constitution independently of the influence peddling of which he could be the object!

For the substantive questions, according to his own ethics, the Prosecutor can prevent his investigation to become an absolute farce, by enforcing the Values of the Constitution in his judgment!

Analysis of Philippe SCHWAB case:

The General prosecutor of the Confederacy is elected by members of parliament.

If he leads an investigation on Philippe SCHWAB's calumny against Dominique de BUMAN, he will have to accuse the national Councillor Philippe BAUER of influence peddling further to the advantages whom Philippe BAUER gave to Me Foetisch and to his criminal organization.

As the election of the General prosecutor depends in particular on Philippe BAUER, the Prosecutor risks to be dismissed and to be the object of blackmail and influence peddling if he does not give up to the pressure of Philippe BAUER and members of brotherhoods of lawyers.

Seen the situation, it is important that all the citizens are informed about the substantive questions by Philippe SCHWAB. Indeed the latter could also have made the object of blackmail.

Soon, it will be exposed on this site the influence peddling in which is involved the national Councillor Philippe BAUER with millions of damage caused to our Nation.

For the substantive questions, Philippe SCHWAB is considered for the moment innocent. If he made the object of blackmail forcing him to malign Dominique de BUMAN, as well as the Authors and the signatories of the demand of parliamentary inquiry, he has the right of reply!

It is instructed to exercise this right to enforce the Values of the Constitution. See part :

180901DE_PS

051217DP_GC

180825DE_DB

180901DE_PS

Philippe SCHWAB
General Secretary of the Parliament

Philippe SCHWAB, in a demonic mail signed by him only, agrees with the colleague of Pascal COUCHEPIN by questioning the enforcement of the Constitution by Dominique de BUMAN.

Outrageous approach because this mail was not signed by Dominique de BUMAN.

Philippe SCHWAB knows that Dominique de BUMAN is a strong supporter of the Christian Values and that he would not allow to betray our nation by asserting that :

"The Parliament, which has the mission to enforce the federal Constitution, introduced a legislation which allows him to by-pass the compliance of the Constitution for its members "

But that is in fact what Philippe SCHWAB asserts in a mail signed by himself, with a reasoning which leaves stunned.

To do things correctly, this demonic mail was transmitted to Dominique de BUMAN, so that he can contradict it.

We remind here that such a mail serves to cover with the "trading in influence" and millions of damage caused by professionals of the law, who are protected by Presidents of the bar/former Presidents of the bar, as Philippe BAUER, national Councillor !

In each to base judgement on evidence :

180825DE_DB

180703DB_DE

For the non-jurists, we remind here that the federal Constitution is the supreme right and that all the laws must be established to enforce her, including the law on the Parliament !!!!

051217DP_GC

180825DE_DB

In Switzerland, it is not better! During the summer period, the Bridge established by Dominique de BUMAN between the people and the supervisory boards of the Parliament did not work.

All the mails requiring measures to end the risks and the damage caused by the critical vulnerability of the judicial system, revealed by Me François de ROUGEMONT, stayed without answer.

The only solution, proposed at present time by a professional of the law to end the critical vulnerability of the judicial system, is the death of a federal Councillor.

The coming to an end summer period, it's time to make sure that the solution proposed by the colleague to Pascal COUCHEPIN - who has this project to eliminate a federal Councillor to assure the safety of the citizens - corresponds to the will of the Parliament as asserts it this Couchepin colleague.

The collapse of the Bridge MORANDI shows that this solution (30 deaths to be heard in this case) seems to be effective to obtain that the political world assumes its responsibilities.

Next publication at the end of August

Pascal COUCHEPIN,
President de la Confederation
Lawyer

La suisse en faute

2016-unworthy justice-reminder
One of the colleagues to Pascal COUCHEPIN, dissident lawyer, accuses the Swiss federal Authorities of applying the methods of the Nazi justice, fought by Maurice BAVAUD, who became a hero of the Roman Catholic Church

2018-unworthy justice-reminder
In front of the violation of human rights by States, Roman Catholic Church makes a commitment to fight against the violation of human rights by the members of the governments. This time, it is the members of federal council who are implicated by the colleague to Pascal COUCHEPIN, further to the SILENCE of the FEDERAL COUNCIL MEMBERS on the critical vulnerability of the judicial system which they hid to the Swiss people.

The President of the federal Assembly, Dominique de BUMAN, the practising Catholic, opened a breach showing the existence of BLACK HOLES in the Parliament.

180626DE_DB

This request of investigation showed a dysfunction of the monitoring system of the Parliament checking the respect for the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitutione.

UPDATE ON THE SITUATION, JUNE 2018
Since then the scandals on the violation of the Values of the Constitution by the federal authorities became transparent, but monitoring system are still not functioning, we observe that:

a) Nothing changed since the faults of the federal authorities have been highlighted by the tribute to the memory of Maurice BAVAUD returned by Pascal COUCHEPIN and by the Roman Catholic Church.

b) Nothing changed since the investigation of Lord Charles MOREROD on the violation of human rights in the scandal of the INSTITUTE MARINI.

We observe simply that not only the monitoring system for controlling the respect of the fundamental rights is always neutralized by those who exercise an unworthy justice, but that now, they are lawyers - who want to denounce the violation of human rights - who are the object of constraint exercised by criminal organizations involving elected representatives.

OF THE PRESENCE OF BLACK HOLES IN THE PARLIAMENT

Recently, M Dominique de BUMAN, who shows his Values of practising Catholic and who made a commitment to break silence on the critical vulnerability of the judicial system, shows that there are Black Holes in the Parliament which force to SILENCE the members of the supervisory boards of the Parliament.

There are de facto members of parliament who have the power to silence all the members of supervisory boards who must control that the Values of the federal Constitution are respected.

OF THE ALERT PUT OUT BY THE COLLEAGUE TO PASCAL COUCHEPIN

We can appreciate that a lawyer has the courage to denounce the critical vulnerability of the judicial system by showing that it is associated with its corporation.

We can appreciate that this lawyer made a reference to Maurice BAVAUD and set the project to eliminate a federal Councillor for ending this critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

On the other hand, as citizens of sovereign people, we cannot tolerate that the members of supervisory boards, who must check that the fundamental rights are respected, allow BLACK HOLES of the PARLIAMENT to establish a climate of terror in Switzerland by exercising some constraint on lawyers.

OF THE FAULT OF THE MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSIONS OF SURVEILLANCE WHO TURN A BLIND EYE ON THE WAY USED BY ME FOETISCH TO FINANCE HIS CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION, BY MAKING EXERCISE SOME CONSTRAINT ON LAWYER WITH THE CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF the JUDICIAL SYSTEM

The constraint exercised by Me Foetisch and the members of his criminal organization to establish a climate of terror in Switzerland do not any more allow the members of the commissions of surveillance to keep silent.

They have to resign, or to end this climate of terror which justifies the project of elimination of a federal Councillor by the colleague to Pascal COUCHEPIN.

All the members of the Commissions of surveillance of the Parliament are instructed to break the silence further to the commitment taken by their President not to turn a blind eye to the critical vulnerability of the judicial system

180702DE_CG

051217DP_GC

180626DE_DB

180702DE_CG

Thursday, June 20th

Alain BERSET meets POPE FRANÇOIS, Head of State of Vatican, who is also the spiritual leader of the Roman Catholic Church.

It is time to remind the existence of the request of parliamentary inquiry, which notices the violation of human rights by the Swiss justice.

051217DP_GC

He knows now that Mr. Dominique de BUMAN and Mrs Doris LEUTHARD, who received him in the presence of Alain BERSET, are witnesses of the violation of the fundamental rights with the critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

He also knows now that freemasons, who deny the existence of GOD, are members of the criminal organization which allows Me Foetisch and his colleagues to commit crimes with complete impunity with the power and help of the Swiss Courts.

If GOD exists, POPE FRANCOIS should be able to convince Alain BERSET - who listens to him and respects him - to enforce the fundamental rights of all the Swiss citizens by ending the existence of the critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

Alain BERSET has taken the oath to respect the federal Constitution.

By taking measures to make condemn those who violate the fundamental rights of the weakest with the critical vulnerability of the judicial system, Alain BERSET would make only his duty of function of President of the Confederacy!

180626DE_PF

180626DE_AB

051217DP_GC

180626DE_PF

180626DE_AB

JEAN-BENOÌT MEUWLY, PRESIDENT OF the COURT OF LA BROYE, HAS BEEN GIVEN NOTICE TO EXPLAIN ITS BEHAVIOR IN FRONT OF THE PARLIAMENT

See part: 180610DE_JM

The scandal of CARPOSTAL showed the dysfunction of the supervisory boards of the State.

Jean-Benoît MEUWLY, President of the COURT of “la BROYE”, makes a masterful demonstration how the COURTS CAN BE ACCOMPLICE OF CORRUPTION if the supervisory boards of the State do not react in time in front of a critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

He tries even to make the President of the Chamber of the pursuits and the bankruptcies CANTONAL, Madam Catherine OVERNAY, complicit in hiding to her the existence of the critical vulnerability of the judicial system. See part: 180620 DE_CO

We observe that he gives the date of June 7th to his mail, (180607JM_DE) while he had already received the mail of June 10th where he has been given notice to explain its behaviour to the committees of surveillance of Parliament !

If the judges - who have to enforce the fundamental rights - can be financed by the State to create damage of several millions by violating these rights:  The first curative measure is to make them jointly responsible for the damage that they create, rather than to finance these magistrates with our taxes to create the damages for a minority corrupt elite: Let us follow the example of South Korea !

051217DP_GC

180610DE_JM

180620 DE_CO

Park Geun-Hye
President of South Korea
Removed by public-spirited Internet users : THE NETIZENS

In this context, which nobody anymore can ignore, Fabien GASSER applies a code of procedure which is not applicable to cover passive corruption. He does it with full knowledge of the facts. Fabien GASSER has been given a formal notice to explain within 10 days his behaviour to the commissions of surveillancee
180610DE_FG

The Court has been made aware that it is not competent to handle the case further to the existence of the critical vulnerability of the judicial system

180610DE_JM

See the upholders of the law of the NET:
(Envoyé spécial / France 2 du 8 juin 2018)

THEY HAVE INVENTED THE SIMPLE SOLUTION!
In front of magistrates who do not investigate and hinder the legal action, in front of media which do not tell the truth, the NETIZENS, public-spirited Internet users, leads their own investigation in a neutral and independent way of the Prosecutor, judicial Authorities and the media.

They publish these inquiries on the NET by showing how the corrupt politicians and the disrespectful employees of the Values of the Constitution proceed to allow a corrupt elite to violate the Values of their Constitution.

The NETIZENS require furthermore that the members of the corrupt elites have to pay off the damage with which they are in collusion.

The efficiency of their action was shown with the scandal of corruption of their President and his inner circle! With their investigation, they managed to make her remove, and to make her condemn by elected representatives who did not want to be in collusion with this corruption.

OF OURS INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION ON THE SCANDAL OF PASSIVE CORRUPTION BOUND TO THE CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND TO THE ROLE OF THE GENERAL PROSECUTOR FABIEN GASSER

The General Prosecutor Fabien GASSER and his deputy know well the request of parliamentary inquiry 051217DP_GC, and its processing made by Me de ROUGEMONT.

They know that the codes of procedures cannot take into account the hidden relations which bind the Bar association to the Courts. They know that it is a critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

They know that Me Foetisch and the members of the criminal organization - who protect him - uses this vulnerability of the judicial system to commit crimes with complete impunity. They know that the commission of surveillance have been alerted.

...Nevertheless, they continue to help Me Foetisch and his criminal organization to commit crimes with complete impunity and to escape the justice by applying these codes of procedure which are not applicable to cover this scandal of violation of the Values of the Swiss Constitution.

Within the framework of this scandal of corruption, where the Fribourgeois Prosecution even took hostage a lawyer by suspending a false denunciation of Me Foetisch for vitiating civil procedure, instead to investigate it, the General Prosecutor Fabien GASSER has been given notice to explain his behaviour to the Commissions of surveillance
180610DE_FG

051217DP_GC

180610DE_JM

180610DE_FG

Hugues HILTPOLD
Architect, national Councillor
Committee management member

Our national Councillor, Hugues Hiltpold, is not selling any alibis. He noted that :
" The processes of corruption described by two journalists show that the Parliament does not act in time!"

It's time that the Committee of management reacts in time in front of the critical vulnerability of the judicial system!

180605DE_HH

Eric Serge JEANNET, of the federal control of the finances, interviewed on one of the biggest financial scandals bound to the corruption, gives the key of the problem, quote :
«There are people who have a high position, where they can make decisions without the other people can contradict them, or question them »

The investigative journalist, Arnaud BÉDAT, describes the reprisals which undergo really, those who take the risk to denounce the violation of the Values of the Constitution, as he has experienced it himself.

The General prosecutor of the Canton of Geneva underlines that reprisals against whistle-blower is not the alone problem to eradicate the corruption: the Prosecutors are also helpless against corruption process to enforce the Values of the Constitution !

Thanks to our national Councillor Hugo HILTPOLD to notice that it is to the Parliament and to the Commissions of surveillance to act in time !
See part 180605DE_HH

Thanks to the journalists Yannick TENET and Dominique WILLEMIN for their broadcasted investigation which shows that the problem of the corruption in Switzerland, could be summarized with this sentence :
« There are people who have a high position, where they can take decisions without the other people can contradict them, or question them »

This sentence applies in any case to the former federal judge Claude ROUILLER who makes false reports, as well as for Me Foetisch, who for more than 20 years compromises all the Swiss justice and makes a fool of all the Prosecutors with his criminal organization.
These two figures have effectively a position more than high in Switzerland, ……as they are even protected by a critical vulnerability of the judicial system put in place by the members of their network

Again the Parliament has not reacted yet, while it knows that a lawyer asserts that the Swiss needs a Maurice BAVAUD so that their government enforces the Values of the federal Constitution! (See comments below of May 9th, 2018)

Michael LAUPER
General Prosecutor of the
Swiss Confederation

The General Prosecutor of the Confederation was warned that a plane has to crash on the Parliament !

Question : what is his duty if he has no competence to act in time as consequence of the existence of the critical vulnerability of the judicial system ?

This clarification was announced on December 14th, 2017. It is still not ended. 171214MP_DE

Since then, members of Me Foetisch’s life, who exploit the critical vulnerability of the judicial system to violate the fundamental rights, are taking advantage of this waiting time to keep exploiting the critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

They exploit it while they know that they are the object of a criminal complaint lodged at the  Prosecution of the Confederation and that the latter wants at first to clarify the federal competence to enforce the fundamental rights, further to the existence of this critical vulnerability of the codes of procedures.

In view of the gravity of the facts and the obligation to denounce in case of incompetence

Given that the majority of the citizens are taken for idiots by a minority elite which allows Me Foetisch and his entourage, among them Prosecutor Raphaël BOURQUIN, to commit crimes with complete impunity,
See part : 180501DE_RB

The General Prosecutor of the Confederacy, Michael LAUPER is made aware of his obligation to denounce the existence of this critical vulnerability of the judicial system to the Commissions of management of the Parliament.
See part : 180530DE_ML

The same approach was made with the President of the Penal Chamber of the cantonal Court of Fribourg, M. Hubert BUGNON
See part : 180529DE_HB

On his side, Sir Bertrand TSCHANZ shows that the code of procedure allows him to held bank as hostage for financing the crimes committed by the criminal organization which uses the critical vulnerability of the judicial system.
See part: 180529DE_BT

051217DP_GC

180501DE_RB

180530DE_ML

180529DE_HB

Hubert BUGNON
President of the Penal Chamber
Fribourg Cantonal Court

What is going to do this President of the Cantonal Court to honour his Oath to make apply the Values of the federal Constitution in view of the existence of the critical vulnerability of the judicial system, highlighted by the processing of the request of parliamentary inquiry?

See part 180519DE_HB

The cantonal and federal Committees of surveillance were informed about this critical vulnerability of the judicial system which the code of procedure does not allow to manage!

180519DE_GC

180521DE_DF

180521DE_AS

The criminal complaint, sent to Alain BERSET, was updated:

180521DE_AB

WHAT HAS TO DO Mr HUBERT BUGNON TO HONOR HIS OATH TO MAKE APPLY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION, FURTHER TO WHAT IT WAS DULY INFORMED ABOUT THE CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM WHICH USE THE MAGISTRATES, AMONG THEM PROSECUTOR RAPHAËL BOURQUIN, TO TAKE THE 90% OF THE CITIZENS FOR “IDIOTS” BY VIOLATING IN A GRIME WAY THE GUARANTEED FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION?

See part : 180501DE_RB
and part: 180504RB_TC

The critical vulnerability of the judicial system, according to the facts established with Me de ROUGEMONT during the processing of the request of parliamentary inquiry, made that the codes of procedures are not applicable. We deduct from this statement that a Cantonal Presiding judge, quibbling, could use this statement to pretend that he is not kept by the obligation to denounce as the code of procedure is not applicable !

It is in any case what would argue the members of the criminal organization who allow Me FOETISCH to commit crimes with complete impunity with the critical vulnerability of the judicial system! It is the vulnerability which uses Prosecutor Raphaël Bourquin to cover organised crime !

180521DE_AB

According to the Spirit of the laws, even if the codes of procedures are not applicable, the federal Constitution is applicable. It is the supreme law, which makes the reference !

The duty of every sworn senior magistrate being to respect the supreme right, and particularly the article 35 of the federal Constitution, we observe that the duty, in any case morale of Hubert BUGNON, is to inform the Parliament surveillance Commission of the existence of the critical vulnerability of the judicial system. He has to specify that he has no independence and no competence to judge the acts of abuse of authority of Prosecutor Raphaël Bourquin in this given context ! 180508DE_TC

He could even recommend to the Parliament commissions of management to organize a confrontation with Me Claude ROUILLER and to make public the recording which heard the federal Councillor Doris LEUTHARD who shows some blackmail with threaten of dismissal to cover organised crime. He could so highlight the critical vulnerability of the judicial system which hides millions of damage by respecting his Oath to make apply the federal Constitution !

IN VIEW OF the GIVEN CONTEXT, WHAT IS GOING TO MAKE THE PRESIDENT OF the CANTONAL COURT, HUBERT BUGNON, TO DENOUNCE THE ACTS OF ABUSE OF AUTHORITY OF PROSECUTOR RAPHAËL BOURQUIN???

180519DE_HB

051217DP_GC

180501DE_RB

180504RB_TC

180508DE_TC

180507HB_DE

180519DE_HB

180519DE_GC

180521DE_DF

180521DE_AS

180521DE_AB

Markus ITH
President Grand Council Fribourg

Our new President of the Big Council of Fribourg, Markus ITH listen to the citizens.
For the next judicial elections, it has been reported to him that several senior government officials and magistrates make an excessive use of a critical vulnerability of the judicial system and that they are the object of a criminal complaint. It is recommended not to elect magistrates who work against the interest of our nation and who take the 90 % of the citizens for "IDIOTS".
See part :180513DE_MI
See part : 180501DE_RB

THE ALERT IS GIVEN TO BANKS AND TO COMMISSIONS OF SURVEILLANCE OF the SWISS PARLIAMENT AND TO THE PRESIDENT OF FRIBOURGEOIS COUNCIL OF STATE:
See part 180513DE_AS
See part 180513DE_CM
See part 180513DE_GG

GOOD NEWS FOR THE CRIMINAL ORGANIZATIONS:
By knowing that the Price of the justice is proportional in its control by corrupt elites, the SWISS receives the best score for the exorbitant price of its justice
See article of May 10th of Beobachter:

As prestigious award for the authors of this unequalled score in the glory of the corrupt Swiss elites:

We recommend to nominate Dr Adrian URWYLER for its code of procedure which is at the origin of a justice which violates systematically the right to be heard and which blows up its price

To offer the prestigious OSCAR of “the magistrate who takes the 90 % of the citizens for "idiots" “ to The Prosecutor Raphaël Bourquin.

THE GOLDEN PALM to the criminal Organization of Me FOETISCH who shows how high magistrates can violate the fundamental rights of the citizens in Switzerland.

AWARD GIVEN BY THE 90 % OF THE CITIZENS WHO ARE TAKEN FOR "IDIOTS" BY THESE PROFESSIONALS OF THE LAW I

To reward these magistrates for their remarkable deceits, the citizens who are taken for idiots, that means the majority of the citizens of our State, recommend to Nicolas CHARRIÈRE, President of the Commission of surveillance of the Judicial Council, to propose to the Big Council fribourgeois :

"To elect magistrates who respect the federal Constitution, instead of these magistrates who violate their Oath to respect the federal Constitution by taking the 90 % of the citizens for idiots to serve the interests of a corrupt elite and those of the criminal organizations instead of those of the majority of the citizens."

See part : 180513DE_CM

051217DP_GC

180501DE_RB

180513DE_BT

180513DE_MI

180513DE_CM

180513DE_GG

180513DE_AS

180513DE_CM

Georges GODEL
Farmer-Entrepreneur
President of Council of State

This President of Council of State, who is also taken for a "IDIOT" by Prosecutor Raphaël BOURQUIN, has the power to enforce the Values of the Constitution.
As PDC farmer entrepreneur, he should be interested in the general interest of our people, who is the one of the 90 % of the citizens taken for "IDIOTS" by the criminal organization to which belongs Me Foetisch

First surprising fact:

The managing director of the BCV, invited to justify this hostage taking after having been informed about the content of the case, let know that Bertrand TSCHANZ had removed his request of seizure.

Second surprising fact:

Bertrand TSCHANZ contacted then by telephone one of the hoirs to tell him, quote :

"WE" found another way ....."

The "WE" is a new danger for the federal Council

The "WE" then showed itself to get the proof the dissident lawyer needed. We remind that this lawyer, who worked with the Swiss underworld, said that the words are of use to nothing more and that Switzerland needs a Maurice BAVAUD who shoots down a federal Councillor in order that the AUTHORITIES enforce again the Values of the Constitution.

The "WE" show clearly the existence of a corrupt elite which takes the 90 % of the citizens for "IDIOTS" by financing magistrates such Prosecutor Raphaël BOURQUIN with public money to destroy the Values of the Constitution.

It would be surprising that Georges GODEL, who is also taken for a "IDIOT" by the "WE", does not make his work of President of council of STATE when he will discover the case content.
See part 180509DE_GG

051217DP_GC

180509DE_GG

Bruno BOSCHUNG
Member of Parliament
President of Parliament in 2017

Bruno BOSCHUNG, President of the Fribourg Parliament in 2017, contrary to Prosecutor Raphaël Bourquin, worried about the contents of the demand of parliamentary inquiry. In a few minutes, he discovered the existence of the hidden relations which bind the Bar association to the Courts. He understood how Me Foetisch and his team used the power of the Courts to commit crimes with complete impunity. He made a commitment to clarify this critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

The Prosecutor BOURQUIN then makes Bruno BOSCHUNG sound like as an "IDIOT" as the 90 % of the citizens"

To be called "idiot" by a cheater who violates his Oath to respect the federal Constitution does not allow to erase the act of abuse of authority. On the contrary, it is an encouragement to clarify the situation, see part :
180502DE_BB

With breathtaking arrogance, while he is the object of a criminal complaint and while he is stackholder in a conflict, Prosecutor Raphaël Bourquin delivers a new judgment to cover his acts of abuse of authority in this conflict, rather than to recuse himself. The kicker is that the criminal complaint, which he judges, was not sent to him because he was stackholder.

With this new act of abuse of authority, he makes look like such a fool all the elected representatives who worry about the violation of the Values of the Constitution with the hidden relations which bind the members of brotherhoods of lawyers to the Courts and who expressed their will not to turn a blind eye on this critical vulnerability of the judicial system.

Among them, we have :

Bruno BOSCHUNG,

Doris LEUTHARD

Dominique de BUMAN

Me François de ROUGEMONT

Me Rudolf SCHALLER

The dissident lawyer

The WITNESSES of the violation of the fundamental rights by the members of brotherhoods of lawyers who files the demand of parliamentary inquiry

....especially the 90 % of the citizens who cannot trust anymore the Swiss justice.

Bruno BOSCHUNG understood at once, that if an authorization of the President of the bar is needed to lodge a complaint against a President administrator who commits a crime and who is a member of a brotherhood of lawyers, while no authorization is needed to lodge a complaint against a President administrator, who is not a member of a brotherhood of lawyers :
There is violation in a grime way of the Values of the Constitution .....

A new complaint is lodged against Prosecutor Bourquin for its new act of abuse of authority in front of a COURT which does not still exist, but which is planned and guaranteed by the federal Constitution

See part: 180501DE_RB

051217DP_GC

180502DE_BB

180501DE_RB

Alain BERSET
President of the Confederation

Alain BERSET called as additional help to end the taken hostage of a family showing into the open the way used by corrupt elites in Switzerland to violate the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution

If Alain Berset, touched, wrote to the  Scanio family who has been despised by the Authorities, he cannot tolerate the taken hostage of a family by a criminal organization, which shows an obvious violation of the Values of the Constitution by a corrupt elite

Mr ERNI HAS JUST HAD HIS FAMILY TAKEN HOSTAGE BY A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION TO BLACKMAIL HIM!

In 2016, the dissident lawyer had warned Mr ERNI that the Federal Court would prevent his lawyer from representing him in front of the Big Council on the report of the former federal judge, Claude ROUILLER, where his right to be heard had been violated, while this report was disputed for its obvious hypocrisy, attested with the elements established with Me of ROUGEMONT.

As Mr. Erni had announced that he would not give up enforcing his fundamental right to be heard, guaranteed by the federal Constitution, the dissident lawyer had warned him that it had to deal with members of a criminal organization, quote :

"c’est incroyable vous m’apprenez que vous voulez recourir au TF pour que votre avocat puisse vous représenter devant le Grand Conseil alors que Me Bettex vous a refusé ce droit. Je vous mets en garde qu’ils vont vous censurer et essayer par tous les moyens de vous anéantir. J’ai appartenu à leur milieu et vous n’avez aucune idée des moyens qu’ils peuvent utiliser"

See part: 161003DE_IG

Reprisals are even worse than those whom the dissident lawyer had announced. Now, those who want to prevent that Me SCHALLER is heard on the Claude ROUILLER's report got in touch with Mr. Erni's members of the family to threaten them with damage to silence Mr. Erni on this critical vulnerability of the judicial system used by professionals of the law to commit crimes with complete impunity.

See part 180425DE_AB

Thank you, Alain BERSET to enforce the Values of the Constitution

It is not any more a question here of identifying the direction in which swims the fish on the Flag of the City of Nyon, but to end the actions of a criminal organization protected by a corrupt elite.

051217DP_GC

161003DE_IG

180425DE_AB

Anne SEYDOUX-CHRISTE
Living in Délémont
(Jurist of The Uni of Fribourg)
PRESIDENTE of CDG-E

HEAVY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE JURA JURIST, THE PRESIDENT OF THE COMMISSION OF MANAGEMENT OF THE PARLIAMENT, TO END THE CRITICAL VULNERABILITY OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM

To be President of the Commission of surveillance of the Parliament, it is to be responsible for assuring that the Values of the Constitution are respected or to take the necessary corrective actions

It is interesting to note that the President of the federal Court confirms not only that he is not competent to deal with the critical vulnerability of the judicial system, but he specifies that in the past he would have already indicated in October, 2014, the weaknesses of the procedural system which allow professionals of the law to by-pass the respect of the Values of the Constitution.

Of the Existence of corrupt Elites of Leaders
Recently, the national Councillor Regula Rytz highlighted the dysfunctions of a public service by the actions of a corrupt elite and a monitoring system which does not work, to see below comments dated March 21st, 2018.

The paper of the former Vaud Deputy, Pierre Santschi entitled :
LA CONSTITUTION EN ETAT DE DISGRÂCE, 24 Heures of 21.03.2018,
shows that the corrupt elites are a threat for the Swiss democracy.

Of the Critical Vulnerability of the judicial System
After that the critical vulnerability of the judicial system was duly explained to Ulrich Meyer, President of the federal Court, quote:

« En 1994, j’ai signé un contrat avec un Président administrateur d’entreprise qui était avocat de métier.
Dans ce contrat, il n’était pas précisé qu’il existe une relation cachée qui lie les avocats aux tribunaux, soit une « disposition légale », cachée à la majorité du peuple, qui stipule que l’on doit obtenir une autorisation du Bâtonnier pour pouvoir porter plainte pénale contre un Président administrateur d’entreprise, qui est avocat de métier, alors qu’il n’en faut pas pour pouvoir porter plainte pénale contre un Président administrateur d’entreprise,  qui n’est pas avocat….. »
...see part 180327DE_TF

Ulrich MEYER confirmed that he had no competence to end this hidden relation which allows a corrupt elite to commit some organized crime with the power of the Courts, see part 180410TF_DE

Of Anne Seydoux's responsibility
It is reminded to the Jura jurist that these hidden relations have already provoked a request of parliamentary inquiry. It belongs to this President of the Parliament Committee of management to check that Swiss citizens, who could be her children, are not betrayed by this corrupt elite, quote:

« Lors de cette audience, nous avons été témoins de pratiques utilisées qui font frémir. Elles mettent en cause toute la crédibilité et l’indépendance de notre justice en particulier face à l'Ordre des avocats. Elles violent la Convention Européenne des Droits de l'Homme à laquelle la Suisse a adhéré »

See part 180417DE_CE

051217DP_GC

180328DE_CE

180327DE_TF

180410TF_DE

180417DE_CE

GOVERNMENT OF VAUD STATE :
THE REIGN OF THE SUSPICION

Nuria GORRITE
President of Council of State

Citizens are ready to give “Mobile phones”  to the Members of the Council of State, so that they can launch alerts to the Press for magistrate suspected of violating the federal Constitution without the risk to be identified on their "Mobile phone" invoice

They are going to analyze the phone invoices of their colleagues to identify the members who launch alerts by leaking information out to the Press

The public announcement already shows that a part of the Members of the Council of State do not approve the measure, but undergo it !

TO GOVERN, IT IS TO RESPECT THE VALUES OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION, BUT IT IS NOT TO PLAY the GAME OF KOH-LANTA WITH  ITS TREACHEROUS RULES

See part 180411DE_NG

The Members of the  Vaud Council of State, who want to enforce the Values of the federal Constitution could benefit from the help of an association of citizens to launch alerts without being worried by the analysis of their phone invoice.

The Council of  VAUD State has to require from the former federal judge, Claude ROUILLER, that he must explain publicly it contested report in its context to end in a credible way the reign of the suspicion.

Further to the set up of this treacherous rule of censorship set up by the Council of State, the mail sent to Cesla AMARELLE was communicated to the President of the Council of State. It is a public confrontation of Claude ROUILLER with those who disputed his expertise which can end the reign of the suspicion. In fact, it is the opposite of this measure of censorship with the surveillance of phone invoice which is necessary, because this measure of censorship can only aggravate this suspicion !!!

180403DE_CA

180411DE_NG

180403DE_CA

Celsa AMARELLE
Councillor of VAUD STATE

Madam Cesla AMARELLE wants to clarify the dysfunctions of the public service and to learn from it to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution, but she will not obtain it with an investigation made by the former federal judge Claude ROUILLER

See part: 180403DE_CA

Apparently we hid her that the former federal judge, Claude ROUILLER, has already made an expertise challenged for its unsoundness and bad faith to hide the dysfunctions of a service of the State. She don't know that a criminal complaint has been lodged against criminal organization, and that Claude ROUILLER is directly concerned by this penal complaint with his expertise where he denies the dysfunctions of a service public established with an other expert.

The federal Constitution in state of disgrace (page 4 of the newspaper 24 HOURS of March 21st, 2018):
It is the Title of the article where, “the guest” : Pierre SANTSCHI, former deputy of the Big Council of the State VAUD, sound the alarm on the violation of the Values of the Constitution by the members of the Swiss Authorities, who forget to respect their Oath to enforce the fundamental rights in their decisions.

See extract article : 180321_24H

The contents of this article were taken back and quoted by several Internet users who severely criticized the investigation entrusted by the State of VAUD to the former federal judge Claude ROUILLER.

Mr Erni received the request of several Internet users to inform the Councillor Cesla AMARELLE of the false expertise which this former federal judge made for the Council of State with the aim of denying the dysfunctions of a Service of the State. Expertise which had been made after these dysfunctions had been already established and explained by Me De ROUGEMONT in 2007 within the framework of the processing of the request of a parliamentary inquiry (051217DP_GC).

Mr Erni then simply invited the Council of State to organize a broadcast public debate so that every citizen has the ability to enquire of the situation in an independent way, (see part 180403DE_CA page 3, quote :

"Il y a actuellement plainte pénale contre organisation criminelle suite à cette fausse expertise de l’ancien juge fédéral Claude ROUILLER  utilisée par l’Etat de Vaud pour vicier un jugement. L’affaire est devant les Commissions de gestion du Parlement.

Cesla AMARELLE hold now all the cards to restore the confidence of the citizens in the Authorities!

To request from the former federal judge, Claude ROUILLER, to explain, in a contradictory public debate, the content of its expertise which denies the dysfunctions of the system already established with Me of ROUGEMONT, another expert of the law, is a simple and effective measure. It would be unacceptable that the State of VAUD pays huge amounts of money to this expert whose integrity was questioned for very serious reasons!

051217DP_GC

180321_24H

180403DE_CA

Gilles MARCHAND
Director of the RTS

Gilles MARCHAND is informed about one of the tricks that the Courts with the brotherhoods of lawyers set up to allow a President administrator of company, lawyer, to commit crimes with complete impunity by violating in a grime way the fundamental rights of the other citizens:

This is the authorization, which a President of the bar has to give, as precondition to be able to lodge a complaint against a President administrator of company, lawyer :

See part: 180328DE_GM

For the first broadcast, we suggest informing the people about the crimes that can commit with complete impunity Presidents administrators of company, lawyers, thanks to the hidden relations which bind lawyers to the Courts, with tricks which make shiver :

Do you know that?

« To lodge a penal complaint against a President administrator of company, lawyer, is needed an authorization of the President of the bar, while to lodge a penal complaint against a President administrator of company, who is not lawyer, is not needed an authorization of the President of the bar »

Do you know that?

The President of the bar can wait several months before giving his answer and he can refuse to give the authorization 

This authorization request is a part of a customary law (= trick) that the people cannot know but which is applied well and truly by professionnals of the law. It is a hidden door in the judicial system which has set up the professionnals of the law who drafted the codes to be able to rob citizens with complete impunity.

One of the specialists who uses this critical vulnerability of the judicial system is Dr Adrian URWYLER. He has just made a demonstration at the federal Court, how with this trick, criminals can cheat and escape from the justice, at the condition that he help them by committing denials of justice. To commit denials of justice with a code of procedure which is not applicable, he turned out to be a real Maestro, to see part 180311DE_TF

The President of the Federal Court, Ulrich Meyer was informed about trick used by this Maestro to cheat :

See part : 180327DE_TF.

The case is now in the hand of the federal Assembly, but a television debate would avoid to the citizens, who cannot know these tricks, to be despoiled by professionals of the law, as for example Dr Adrian URWYLER who cheats with a code of procedure which he knows that it is not applicable!

180328DE_GM

180311DE_TF

180327DE_TF

Regula RYTZ
National Councillor

Above, the National Councillor Regulated RYTZ breaking the OMERTA on the corruption which reigns in the management of a public service as CarPostal.

Quote:
" With these alleged acts we rather have to do with corrupt elites of Third World countries rather than with Swiss Post office"

IN RESPONSE TO THIS REPORT OF THE EXISTENCE OF CORRUPT ELITES, A MESSAGE OF A RADICAL CHANGE IS GIVEN BY NATIONAL COUNCILLORS of WHOM THE COUNCILLOR HUGUES HILTPOLD :

Those who commit criminal offences with tricks to cheat - that is trickeries - do not have to remain any more unpunished and, this rule should be applied at all level !

To discover some extracts of this Parliament debate at the origin of this new paradigm, to see pages 3 and 4 of the following document :

180320DE_CN

THIS DEBATE IS THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF AN INDISPENSABLE CHANGE OF PARADIGM WITH THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES WHICH GIVE TOO MUCH POWER TO THE CORRUPT ELITES :

The deceit with procedural tricks should not allow anymore corrupt elites to commit economic crimes with complete impunity, measures should be taken so that their members, who commit criminal offences, are punished

A warm congratulations and one THANKS TO the National Councillors who want that the members of a corrupt elite at the head of public service do not enjoy any more the impunity for the violation of the rules of the good faith by using tricks to cheat and by-pass the respect of the Values of the Constitution.

The scandal which grips a public service as CarPostal is due to the members of a corrupt ruling elite which uses tricks to cheat. They know that these tricks would send them directly in jail, if they would work for the private sector, but they use them by knowing that they have no risk, because they work at the head of a public service, for which the control systems are failing.
See the intervention at pages 2 to 4 : 180320DE_CN

IT IS EXACTLY THE ANALYSIS WHICH HAD MADE ME DE ROUGEMONT FOR THE DYSFUNCTION OF the PUBLIC SERVICE OF THE "JUSTICE COUPLED WITH THE BAR ASSOCIATION" DESCRIBED IN THE DEMAND OF PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRY AND FOR WHICH HE HAD PROPOSED TWO CURATIVE MEASURES:

a) To record all the audiences
b) To punish automatically those who violate the fundamental rights

See demand of parliament enquiry : 051217DP_GC

REMINDER OF SOME TRICKS USED TO CHEAT, EXPLAINED BY ME DE ROUGEMONT

1) One of the hidden tricks to the people put at disposal of a President of company, lawyer, to cheat
There are hidden relations which bind the Bar association to the Courts which requires that is needed an authorization of the President of the bar to lodge a complaint against a President of company, lawyer, while such an authorization is not needed to lodge a complaint against a President of company who is not lawyer. This requirement is hidden to the people.

In 1995, Me Foetisch, President of ICSA explained that he committed criminal offences because his Title of lawyer assured him the impunity. He used, among others, this trick of the authorization request hidden to the people to cheat, namely that he could not be the object of a criminal complaint without the authorization of the President of the bar and that he was assured that the President of the bar would refuse to give the authorization.

2) Tricks hidden to the people to cheat, put at disposal of the Presidents of Courts in the codes of procedures
Me De Rougemont had explained that :

The codes of procedures allow a judge to vitiate a judgment by ruling out the facts in favour of one of the parties without risking to be penalised.

The authors of the codes of procedures have planned no means of control to assure that a magistrate respects the fundamental rights in his decisions, among which the rules of the good faith.

By definition, the authors of code of procedures consider that a judge cannot be corrupted because he is sworn.

Me de Rougemont had confirmed :

The existence of the hiddenrelations to the people which bind the members of brotherhoods of lawyers to the Courts which allow them to commit economic crimes with complete impunity.

Me of ROUGEMONT had explained that a judge who commits a denial of justice knows that he will never be penalised. This principle with the hidden relations binding the bar association to the Courts allowed Me Foetisch with his colleagues to commit crimes with complete impunity. He qualified this critical dysfunction of the judiciary system as a deficiency of the application laws which do not give access to neutral and independent Courts.

When he learnt that Judge Bertrand Sauterel had asserted that a damage, estimated at more than 2 million for the violation of the copyright by judicial expertise, was only worth 4000 CHF, Me de ROUGEMONT could not explain it with the tricks put at disposal of the Courts to cheat. He wanted that judge SAUTEREL meets the public to explain such a judgment which violates in an incomprehensible way the rules of the good faith.

A QUESTION HAS RAISED WITH THE NEW PARADIGM AND THE RECOGNITION OF THE EXISTENCE OF CORRUPT ELITES:
Would the Judges, who assert respecting the fundamental rights as judge Bertrand SAUTEREL or judge Christine HABERMACHER, have been threatened in order that  Me De ROUGEMONT did not manage to explain how they can assert that a damage of 2 millions = a damage of 4000 CHFF

How come that the author of the code of procedure, Adrian URWYLER, did not take into account elements established with Me De ROUGEMONT to draft the code of procedure?

As underlined it the National Councillor Jean-Jacques MAIRE, it is now necessary to wonder about the motivations which push the members of an elite, as for example here magistrates, to commit ciminal offences among which of the denials of justice while they have to apply the article 35 in their decisionss !
Especially, it is necessary to take measures so that those who commit criminal offences as the denial of justice to grant advantages to a party must be automatically penalised and should not be allowed to get the prescription for their criminal offences,
See part : 180320DE_CE

051217DP_GC

180320DE_CN

180320DE_CE

Ulrich MEYER
President of the Federal Court

Ulrich Meyer cannot enforce any more the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution further to the judgment of the Federal Court which deprived Dr Erni to be represented by Me Schaller on the Rouilller Report.

See part 160819RS_TF

Me Foetisch and his colleagues finally managed to block the functioning of the Federal Court with the cover provided by the Rouiller Report granted by the Federal Court to Me Foetisch to cover up his economic crimes

Called at the bedside of the Federal Court, Dr Adrian URWYLER makes a masterful demonstration of the way the code of procedure, which he has drafted, allows to block the judicial system for the citizens who ask the respect of the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution, by forcing them to make excessive constitutional appeals.

See part : 180201TC_DE

.... but there will be no constitutional appeal.

See part : 180311DE_TF

This time the alert is given to the Committees of surveillance of the Federal Court :

See part : 180311DE_CN

A project of curative measure to restore the respect of the fundamental rights, among which the equality and the protection against the arbitrary power, the articles 8 and 9 of the federal Constitution, is proposed:

It is simply necessary to apply the principle of equality in front of the law for all and first and foremost for the Presidents of Courts:

“Since Presidents of Courts find normal to make dismiss citizens to protect members of brotherhoods, it is also necessary to make dismiss these Presidents of Courts by making them undergo the same damage as the one that they make undergo to the victims of crimes committed by lawyers with the cover, that the Federal Court grant to them "

See page 8 of part :180311DE_CE

Of the cover granted by the Federal Court and Professor Claude ROUILLER to Patrick Foetisch further to the hidden relations which bind the members of brotherhoods of lawyers to the Courts

In 1995, Claude ROUILLER is President of the Federal Court.
This year, Me Foetisch, as PRESIDENT of the executive board of ICSA Company commits 3 breaches : unfair management, swindle, and violation of the copyright to allow his friend Penel, manager of ICSA, to compete disloyally with Mr Erni. To do it, Me Foetisch declares that the contract of October 19th, 1994, which bound ICSA to Mr. Erni and which allowed him to have access to the know-how developed by Mr. Erni and protected by the copyright, was never valid. Then the President of ICSA announces that they are going to use the know-how and the product acquired with this contract in a illicit way, further to what he declared that the contract was never valid and that he does not want to return the product and knowhow benefits.

Of the cover granted by the Federal Court, of whom Claude ROUILLER is member, to the President of ICSA further to the hidden relations binding the bar association to the courts :
Me Foetisch explains to Mr. Erni that as lawyer he is protected at the highest level of the justice that means by the Federal Court, of whom the President is Claude ROUILLER, and that his breaches will never be investigate. He explains to Mr. Erni that if the latter dares to lodge a complaint, he will make him ruin and demolish by the Courts to must undergo unfair and abusive procedure until he gives up. He makes observe to Mr. Erni that he ruined him and that Mr. Erni does not have more than the choice to close his company immobilized by his breaches.

Of the bar association which confirms that the President of ICSA enjoys a protection cover of the judiciary system assuring him the impunity of his breaches (economical crimes)
Mr. Erni learns that he needs an authorization of the President of the Bar to lodge a complaint against the President of ICSA, because he is lawyer, while no authorization is needed to lodge a complaint against a President who is not lawyer. This authorization is refused.
Mr. Erni would never have signed a contract with the President of ICSA if he had known this occult right.
He is going to discover a whole series of hidden relations which allow Me Foetisch to commit crimes with complete impunity, as the latter announced it.

Of the confirmation by Me de ROUGEMONT of the existence of the hidden relations, which bind the Bar association to the Courts, which creates a breach in the cover granted by the Federal Court and Claude Rouiller, cited by Me Foetisch in 1995 to justify his crimes which would remain unpunished.

In 2007, further to a request of parliamentary inquiry, Me de ROUGEMONT confirms the existence of these hidden relations, binding lawyers to the Courts, which allow Me Foetisch to commit crimes with complete impunity.
He explains how Me Foetisch and his colleagues use these hidden relations binding them to the Courts to ruin their victims by forcing them to comply with unfair prescribed procedure.

He explains that the codes of procedures are not applicable, because they do not allow to take into account these hidden relations. That is how the Presidents of executive board of a Company, with a Title of lawyer, benefit of a cover of the Federal Court which assures them the impunity. He confirms that it does not belong to Mr Erni to have to undergo damage and to have to finance the judicial procedures with this lacking in the legislation which does not give access to neutral and independent Courts.

To seal the breach in the protection cover of Me Foetisch, made by the public revelations of Me de ROUGEMONT, the case is removed from him and transferred to Professor Claude ROUILLERR

Professor Claude ROUILLER drafts then a report which denies the established facts with Me de ROUGEMENT

The Federal Court violates then to Me Schaller the right guaranteed by the ECHR to represent Mr. Erni on the contents of this report of the former president of the Federal Court, while this report is disputed for its bad faith further to the revelations made by Me de ROUGEMONT. It is a censorship process which assures again the smooth running of the cover granted by the Federal Court and Claude ROUILLER to Me Foetisch to allow him to ruin the victims of his crimes to comply with unfair prescribed procedure.

See part 160520RS_TF then : 160819RS_TF

New curative measure proposed to the committees of surveillance of the judiciary system to end the cover provided by the Rouiller report granted by the Federal Court to Me Foetisch, which allows him to create damage by violating the fundamental rights of his victims with a code of not applicable and unfair prescribed procedures:

To apply the principle of the equality of the citizens, with the criterion of control :

" DO NOT DO TO OTHERS,WHAT YOU WOULD NOT WANT DONE TO YOU"

... and to charge to the magistrates the damage which they impose to the citizens to comply with unfair prescribed procedures violating the fundamental rights, and which they would not tolerate for themselves...

...with this measure, the critical vulnerability of the judiciary system, which allow Professional of the law to commit crimes with full impunity with the hidden relations would be then ended by applying the principe of equality guaranteed by the Constitution !

See curative measure page 8 : 180311DE_CE

We indicate that in 2002, the President of ICSA compromised all the judicial system by testifying on oath that the Contract of October 19th, 1994, which he had refused to honour to torpedo the company to Mr. Erni and compete with him disloyally, was the only valid contract !
It is the best given proof by the Professional of the law that the codes of procedures do not allow to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution, as had explained it Me de ROUGEMONT!

160819RS_TF

180201TC_DE

180311DE_TF

051217DP_GC

180311DE_CN

180311DE_CE

Me Patrick FOETISCH

1.- President of ICSA SA
2.- The MOUNTAIN of P. Penel
3.- The Hidden Lawyer of Penel
4.- Board of Directors Kudelski
5.- The favorite of Bar President
6.- The Brotherhoods Machiavelli

Jean TRECCANI was promoted substitute federal judge after having removed illicitly the private correspondences between the President of ICSA and the Mr. Penel which were under sequestration,...
..... but the photocopy of some parts before their disappearance left a dangerous track showing the hidden relations which assure him the impunity

The President of the Court Bertrand Sauterel was promoted State Judge for having asserted in his judgment that the damage for violation of the copyright was not upper to 4000 CHF while he knew that a judicial expertise had established it for more than 2 million. He made this act of abuse of authority to hide the professional blackmail with a false denunciation exercised by Me Foetisch and his colleagues against Mr Erni, further to what the latter had interrupted the prescription for the swindle and what he refused to remove it in exchange for a dismissal of the charges for the false denunciation, ...
..but a request of parliamentary inquiry filed by witnesses of the audience of judgment highlighted the act of abuse of authority
051217DP_GC

The Professor, Me Claude ROUILLER, promoted in the past federal Judge, made a false expertise to deny the established facts with the request of parliamentary inquiry. The hypocrisy of its expertise was not able to be established further to the violation made for Mr. Erni's lawyer to represent him. These facts were the object of a public conference in 2010 .....
... This act of unimaginable abuse of authority for the majority of the citizens led a dissident lawyer, to ask to consult all the file. He confirmed that Me Foetisch was a dangerous MOUNTAIN which could provoke at any time the death of a federal Councillor.....

We remind that at the origin of this case the President of the bar forbade that Me Foetisch can be the object of a criminal complaint.
961019DE_OP

Me Maire declared that the behavior of Me Foetisch was Machiavellian
970224JM_DE

The President of the Bar : Philippe Richard, Ives Burnand, Christian Bettex, Philippe Bauer,...., all showed that they did not hesitate to violate the Values of the Constitution to allow the President of ICSA being able to commit crimes with complete impunity.

IN 2018, THE SOCIETY 2.0, WITH THE ACCESSIBLE DIGITAL DATA TO EVERYBODY, DOES NOT ALLOW ANY MORE THOSE WHO MAKE AN EXCESSIVE USE OF THEIR POWER TO MAKE IT SHIELDED FROM THE LIGHTS. FOR EXAMPLE, WIKILEAKS SHOWS THAT THE CENSORSHIP OF THE PRESS AND THE CRIMINALITY OF STATE CAN BE MADE PUBLIC; ANONYMOUS SHOWS THAT THE CITIZENS HAVE NEW WAYS TO UNMASK THE PROFESSIONALS OF THE JUSTICE WHO DO NOT WANT TO ENFORCE THE FUNDAMENTAL GUARANTEED RIGHTS BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION.

HIDDEN RELATIONS BINDING the BAR ASSOCIATION TO THE COURTS WHICH CAUSED MR. PENEL’S DEATH ACCORDING TO THE EXPLANATIONS OF THE DISSIDENT LAWYER

OF THE DEATH OF POISONED P. PENEL
In 2016, in the above given context, a dissident lawyer, which had recordings taken between magistrates and lawyers showing negotiations for hidden arrangements, which could concern Mr. Erni, asked to see all the file concerning the crimes committed by the President of ICSA.

He was very interested in Mr. Penel's death. Like it was mentioned below, to see comments on February 7th, 2018, he considered that:

"Pierre PENEL would have been murdered (poisoned) further to what the hidden relations which bind the Bar association to the Courts allowed Judge de Montmollin to remove of the file the contents of the mail of January 18th, 1996"

OF THE ILLICIT REMOVING THE SEQUESTRATION OF PRIVATE CORRESPONDENCES BETWEEN FOETISCH and PENEL BY THE JUDGE TRECCANI
In 2007, Me Paratte had testified on the illicit removing the sequestration of parts (among which there was private correspondences between Mr. Penel and Me Foetisch) who had been returned to Mr. Penel by Judge Treccani.
See part d506 (point 1). Unbelieving Me Nardin had asked for an investigation to the Prosecution which had confirmed the illicit removing the sequestration.

The dissident lawyer had told Mr. Erni that Me Nardin had done well to ask for an investigation on this illicit removing the sequestration.
Some private correspondences (between Foetisch and Penel) under sequestration had been able to be photocopied before their disappearance. The dissident lawyer had made a Kafka's, but very relevant analysis of the illicit removing the sequestration of these private correspondences, made by Judge Jean Treccani.

We quote here two of these parts with the comments that the dissident lawyer had made for Mr. ERNI:

"THE MOUNTAIN OF Mr. PENEL" see part 950707PP_PF
The dissident lawyer had said, in this mail: you see that Judge Treccani knew that the President of ICSA, Me Foetisch, who must respect the non-competition clause, had announced to Mr. PENEL that he had the power of a MOUNTAIN and that he would make you annihilate by the Courts by violating this clause.
Dans ce courrier: you see that Judge Treccani knew that the President of ICSA, Me Foetisch, worked against the interests of ICSA to allow his friend Penel to compete with you as well as the administrator Hennard in an unfair way.

"THE HIDDEN LAWYER OF Mr. PENEL" see part 950515PF_PP
'The dissident lawyer had said, in this mail: in this mail, you see that Judge Treccani knew that the President of ICSA, Me Foetisch, acted as Mr. Penel's lawyer, who set up his own business while the contract which binds him to ICSA did not allow him to do it. Me Foetisch, as President of the Board of ICSA, couldn’t be the lawyer of Penel to swindle ICSA. This was unfair management.

"OF THE TESTIMONY ON OATH OF ME FOETISCH IN 2002"
The dissident lawyer had also found the testimony of the President of ICSA made on oath in 2002, to see comments below of January 2nd, 2018.
He had pointed out that by testifying that it was the Contract of October 19th, 1994 which was the only applicable contract, Patrick Foetisch had de facto sentenced to death Pierre PENEL whose hidden lawyer or the "MOUNTAIN" he was. (If Pierre PENEL had not been murdered, he had documents to make condemn Me Foetisch who had betrayed him with his testimony on OATH)".

He had observed that Judge Jean Treccani knew that when there is criminal complaint for swindle, violation of the copyright and unfair management, he could not remove the sequestration and give back to Mr. Penel the private correspondences (between Penel and Foetisch) which would have allowed him to charge the President of ICSA, in order to be able to grant a dismissal of the charges to Me Foetisch. It asked for no comment, except that the ban made by the Bar Association that Me Foetisch can be the object of a criminal complaint had put down all the functioning of the judicial system.

The dissident lawyer had simply explained to Mr Erni that: he had to deal with a powerful criminal organization and that the words were of use to nothing more. The dissident lawyer had said that he knew who had poisoned Mr Penel, and he had found in the file elements that it would not have imagined.

Since this organization had made murder P. Penel and had asked Professor Claude ROUILLER, former President of the federal Court to make a false report to contradict the established facts with Me de ROUGEMONT by depriving Mr. Erni of the right to be represented by his lawyer, the dissident lawyer asserted that the federal Court would violate to Mr. Erni the right to be represented by his lawyer if  he would appeal to get it !
He has been proved right, but the dissident lawyer is also committed to make a surgical strike if he has been proved right.
Today, Me Foetisch also became a dangerous MOUNTAIN for the federal Council and the unpunished magistrates for their denial of justice which the SOCIETY 2.0 cannot hide anymore !

961019DE_OP

950707PP_PF

950515PF_PP

051217DP_GC

970224JM_DE

Me Maurice ROPRAZ

1.- Lawyer (Fribourg University)
2.- Member of Judicial Council
3.- Councillor of Fribourg State

As Lawyer, Me Ropraz knows well the hidden relations from the Public, binding lawyers to the Courts, used by Me Foetisch and his colleagues to commit crimes with complete impunity.

As Lawyer, member of the Judicial Council, Me Ropraz knows well the process of denials of justice applied by the judges, who are assured that their abuses of authority will never be punished, as they made them to allow the members of brotherhoods of lawyers to commit crimes with complete impunity. He knows that the magistrates are incited to commit denials of justice to be promoted in the judicial hierarchy, while they should be condemned to violate the fundamental rights.

As representative of the Council of State for the Judicial Council, Me Maurice Ropraz can end the violation of the fundamental rights by requiring on the legislative level that the Judges, who commit denials of justice, cannot be any more promoted, but on the contrary must be condemned in a exemplary way.

He  knows that the codes of procedures are used by Me Foetisch and his colleagues to by-pass the respect for the fundamental rights by going, as far as depriving a citizen of the right to be represented by his lawyer within the framework of crimes committed by professionals of the law.

He knows that the vulnerability of the judicial system is that the codes of procedures do not force the professionals of the law to respect the fundamental rights in their decision

Me Ropraz, as Member of the Council of State, acting as Lawyer for an Average customer, knows that he could not enforce the fundamental rights if he had been deprived by Me Bettex and the federal Court of the right to pronounce on the report ROUILLER. He knows that, if the federal Court or the authorities violate the right of his Average customer to be represented by him on the report ROUILLER, the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution are violated.

He knows that such a process is unbearable in a democratic state governed by the rule of law.

THE PRIVILEGES & HIDDEN RELATIONS (Correction 1)
As experienced lawyer, Me Maurice ROPRAZ, as Me De ROUGEMONT explained it, knows that the codes of procedures are not applicable in this context because they do not allow to take into account the hidden relations, binding the Bar association to the Courts, which allow the members of brotherhoods to commit crimes with complete impunity.

As showed it the Presidents of the bar: Me Philippe Richard, Me Philippe BAUER, Me Christian BETTEX, then Professor Claude ROUILLER and the dissident lawyer,…, Me Maurice ROPRAZ knows that these hidden relations are critical vulnerabilities of the judicial system, which are used by the professionals of the law to violate in grime way the respect of the fundamental rights of a whole part of the population.

Of the authorization requested to lodge a complaint against a President of company, lawyer
Me Ropraz knows that it is not necessary to have an authorization of the President of the Bar to lodge a complaint against a President administrator of company, who is not lawyer, while it is needed for lodging a complaint against a President administrator, who is lawyer. He knows that Me Foetisch and his colleagues use this hidden privilege from the public to commit their crimes in full impunity.

Of the false denunciation which cannot be contradicted
Me Ropraz knows that the Bar association with a false denunciation, which it is not possible to contradict further to the hidden relations which bind the Bar association to the Courts, can ruin the victim of a crime committed by their members by forcing her to do excessive procedure in front of Courts which are not independent, as gave evidence of it Me Bettex.

Of the professional blackmail with a false denunciation
Me Ropraz knows that there is a real criminal organization behind Me Foetisch and his colleagues who use the false denunciation to make some professional blackmail. Me Ropraz knows that these criminal acts are possible thanks to the fact that Prosecutors, as "Raphaël Bourquin", "Fabien Gasser" who have the duty to enforce the fundamental rights in their decision, don’t do it because the code of procedures are vitiated with the hidden relations which bind the Courts to the bar Association. He knows that these hidden relations allow the members of the brotherhoods of lawyers to prevent the investigation of crimes committed by their members by violating with complete impunity the fundamental rights of the victims with permanent denials of justice.

Of the pressures exercised on the lawyers of the victims
Me Ropraz knows that the Bar association, by means of the federal Court, can censor the lawyer of the victim of Me Foetisch crime by depriving the lawyer of the right to represent his customer (Example: case of the report ROUILLER).
He knows that if lawyers refuse to take a mandate for defending the victim against Me Foetisch and his colleagues, the Courts will constraint the victim to pay arbitrary fees to the lawyers who have refused to take the mandate. For example, President Meuwly made it.

As state Councillor, Me Ropraz knows that, to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution, he has the duty to make delete these hidden relations and these privileges which lawyers have.

DENIALS OF JUSTICE CHARACTERIZED (Correction 2)
OF THE IMPUNITY OF THE DENIALS OF JUSTICE WHICH IS A SCANDAL ACCORDING TO ME De ROUGEMONT AND SEVERAL LAWYERS

As experienced lawyer, Me Maurice ROPRAZ, as Me De ROUGEMONT explained it, knows that it is incomprehensible that Judge Sauterel can argue that a damage estimated at more than 2 millions CHF with a judicial expertise was worth of only 4000 CHF.
He knows that it would not be possible if judges - who make denials of justice - were condemned and were deprived of any promotion.
He knows that today the system of evaluation of the prosecutors and the judges does not take into account the respect of the fundamental rights, but the number of handled files.
Me Ropraz knows that it is the critical vulnerability of the judicial system that a judge who commits a denial of justice, by not respecting the fundamental rights in his decisions, is not automatically accused of violation of the fundamental rights, but on the contrary is often rewarded by a promotion in the judicial hierarchy.

As noticed it Me De ROUGEMONT, Me Ropraz knows that it does not belong to the victims of denial of justice to have to finance of the procedure to enforce their fundamental rights, but it is the DUTY of the state to force the judges to enforce the fundamental rights in their decisions and to condemn those who violate the fundamental rights with codes of the procedures vitiated on purpose

With his three skills, Me Maurice ROPRAZ can end this critical vulnerability of the judicial system, see request below :

180225DE_CM

180225DE_OP

180225DE_CM

21.02.18

Professor Claude ROUILLER,
President of the federal Court
in 1995

In 2007, during the handling of a request of parliamentary inquiry, Me de ROUGEMONT had revealed that the codes of procedures were not applicable to judge the economic crimes committed by members of brotherhoods of lawyers, because they did not allow to take into account the hidden relations which bind the Bar association to the Courts, it is:

"a critical vulnerability of the judicial system"

In this context, he could not explain the behavior of the President of the Court Bertrand SAUTEREL, who put in his judgment that the damage estimated at more than 2 millions by judicial expertise for a violation of the copyright, were only of 4000 CHF. Me de ROUGEMONT had made a commitment to organize an interview between the judge and the authors of the parliamentary inquiry so that he answers directly their questions. Big surprise:

" Me de ROUGEMONT was then forbidden to organize the interview and he would have been  removed from the case"

Members of the Big Council (most probably freemasons) asked to Professor Claude ROUILLER, one of the former Presidents OF THE FEDERAL COURT, to resume the file. This professor, a  kind of legend of the judicial system, asserted in his report the opposite of the elements established with Me de ROUGEMONT.

The contents of the report of Me Claude ROUILLER having been disputed by Me Rudolf Schaller, Me Christian BETTEX asked to the "colleagues of the federal Court" of this former President of the federal Court to censor Me Rudolf SCHALLER.

(In each to consult the documents to verify that this story is not the one of a horror movie, but a reality due to the fact that the codes of procedures do not allow enforcing the fundamental rights in this given context)

On the hidden relations binding Me Foetisch to the Courts
In 1995, the Chairman of the board of the Company ICSA, Me Foetisch, violates the copyright and torpedos the company of Mr Erni to compete with him disloyally.
Me FOETISCH justifies it in calling upon its Title of lawyer and the hidden relations which bind his brotherhood to the Courts, which allow him to commit economic crimes with complete impunity.
The bar association confirms the existence of the hidden relations, by forbidding that a criminal complaint can be lodged against Me Foetisch. The damages caused by this violation of the copyright, committed with full impunity with the use of this critical vulnerability of the judicial system, are going to be estimated at more than 2 millions. It is only the beginning.

On the professional blackmail to force Mr Erni to give up his rights
Mr.  Erni interrupts the prescription.
He is then falsely accused by accomplices of Me Foetisch, among whom are members of the order of lawyers. They make him some professional blackmail to dismiss him by intriguing with his employer to force him to remove his interruption of prescription. There is a witness, who can prove the false accusation.

On the inequitable judgment of Judge Bertrand SAUTEREL, further to Mr. Erni's refusal to give in to the blackmail
Mr. Erni refuses to give in to the professional blackmail. He requires the testimony of the unique witness of the false accusation which can prove the falsity of the accusation.
The Judge Bertrand SAUTEREL says that he cannot make testify the unique witness, because this witness was forbidden by Me Christian BETTEX, vice-President of the bar, to testify.
Knowing that no Court can make testify this witness forbidden to testify by the Bar association, the judge Bertrand Sauterel asserts in his judgment that the damage was only 4000 CHF, while he knew that it was estimated  at more than 2 millions by judicial expertise.
This trick is used to persuade that the interruption of prescription was unjustified.

On the Codes of procedures which are not applicable in this given context
In 2007, Me de ROUGEMONT, appointed by the Big Council, explains that the codes of procedures are not applicable, because they cannot take into account the hidden relations which bind the bar association to the Courts. He explains that it is this principle which uses Me Foetisch and his colleagues to commit economic crimes with complete impunity. They force their victims to defend themselves with codes of procedures which are not applicable and inequitable.

On the the heavy artillery organized with a former President of the federal Court to counter the  facts established with Me de  ROUGEMONT
Me de ROUGEMONT would have been removed from the file. The latter is confided to one of a kind of legend of the justice, who is the former President of the federal Court: Professor Claude ROUILLER.
Me Claude ROUILLER drafts a report where he denies the established facts with Me de ROUGEMONT.
Me Schaller disputes the contents of the report, but his right to be able to represent Mr. Erni is violated, while he was officially appointed by Mr. Erni to represent him. This violation to be heard lasts for 8 years.

On the critical vulnerability of the judicial system, used by the federal Court to cover the organized crime
In 2016, during mediation, Me Bettex, who prevented the unique witness of the false accusation from testifying, confirms to Mr. Erni that it is impossible to contradict this false accusation in this given context. In front of Me Schaller, who maintains that Mr. Erni's fundamental rights have been violated, acting with its Title of lawyer of the State, Me BETTEX makes apply by the federal Court these codes of procedures which are not applicable, according to the elements established with Me de ROUGEMONT, to deprive Me Schaller to be able to pronounce on this report of Professor Claude ROUILLER, a kind of legend of the justice.

See part 180218DE_JS

(A dissident lawyer summarized these 21 years of unfair procedures made with these codes of procedures which are not applicable by saying that Switzerland needs a Maurice BAVAUD)

051217DP_GC

180218DE_JS

(See comments below at the date of January 9th, 2018)

Thanks to him, for the first time, the deficiencies of the justice are not anymore a TABOO subject.

The Management Committees of The Parliament have just been informed about a critical vulnerability of the judicial system which allows the Professionals of the law to abuse of their power and to violate in a grimeway the fundamental rights of a part of the population!

With the new rule:

" The Zero Tolerance becomes the Standard at Parliament" :

THE HIDDEN RELATIONS WHICH BIND LAWYERS, MEMBERS OF BROTHERHOODS, TO THE COURTS, USED BY LAWYERS TO COMMIT CRIMES WITH COMPLETE IMPUNITY, ARE NOT ANY MORE HIDDEN TO THE MEMBERS OF THE SUPERVISORY COMMISSIONS OF the PARLIAMENT

Management Committee of the Council of the States, to read:
Part : 180129DE_CE and part: 180212DE_CE

Management Committee of the National Council, to read :
Part : 180129DE_CN and part: 180212DE_CN

On this day of St Valentine's Day, it is a beautiful present for the lovers of the respect for the Values of the Constitution

180129DE_CE

180212DE_CE

180129DE_CN

180212DE_CN

Click here fore more info

Informed that the code of procedure is not applicable further to the elements established with Me  de ROUGEMONT, Dr Adrian Urwyler, with a breathtaking self-assurance, shows how the code of procedure allows to by-pass the respect of the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution.

See part 180204DE_AU

The Newspaper the HEBDO had sound the alarm on the dysfunction of the codes of procedures, Dr Adrian Urwyler, one of the authors of the codes, confirmed it !
See part: 160407_HEBDO

THE EXPLANATION OF the DYSFUNCTION OF OUR CODES OF PROCEDURES GIVEN BY OUR HARVEY  WEINSTEIN, THE NATIONAL COUNCILLOR, PHILIPPE BAUER, AS FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE BAR
On March 31st, 2010, Philippe BAUER obtained that the federal Court breaks the judgment of Neuchâtel of February 3rd, 2009, jugement_NE, which would have allowed to end the crimes committed by the members of brotherhoods with the hidden relations which bind them to the Courts. .
The President of the bar, Philippe BAUER, wanted that the federal Court admits that, if Me BETTEX had forbidden a member of their brotherhood - unique witness of a false accusation - to testify,  it was this witness who must take the risk of violating  the ban to testify  with the risk of being excluded from the Brotherhood for this disobeying orders. Everybody must know that Me de ROUGEMONT had explained in 2006 that no member of Brotherhood could take this economic risk to be excluded from the Brotherhood.
In summary, the President of the Bar, Philippe BAUER, wanted to put the private interest of its brotherhood ahead of those of our Nation by violating in a grime way the fundamental rights with the hidden relations binding his Brotherhood to the federal Court.

THE FEDERAL COURT APPLYING THE CODE OF PROCEDURE, VITIATED  WITH THE HIDDEN RELATIONS, AGREED WITH HIM.
AT THE PAGE 10 OF HIS JUDGMENT, THE FEDERAL COURT CONFIRMED THAT IT IS THE MEMBER OF THE BROTHERHOOD WHO MUST TAKE THE ECONOMIC RISK TO VIOLATE THE BAN TO TESTIFY MADE BY THE BROTHERHOOD IN ORDER TO RESPECT THE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT GUARANTEED BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF THE FALSE ACCUSED WITH A FALSE DENUNCIATION MADE BY MEMBERS OF THE BROTHERHOOD.

In short, the National Councillor, Me Philippe BAUER, had demonstrated masterfully that the codes of procedures do not yet have any measure for the control of the constitutional fundamental rights respect, because, in contrary, procedures are de facto drafted to allow the members of brotherhoods to commit crimes with complete impunity.

The federal Court, by this judgment, confirmed that the power of Presiding judges is reduced by the Bar association. The latter can force them to violate the fundamental rights of the citizens by depriving them of the right to be able to make testify the unique witness of a false accusation made by members of the Bar association.

FUNCTION OF THE CODES OF PROCEDURES:
THE CODES OF PROCEDURES AIM AT ENFORCING THE SUPERIOR RIGHTS, WHICH ARE THE FUNDAMENTAL GUARANTEED RIGHTS BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION

HIDDEN RELATIONS VITIATING THE CODES OF PROCEDURES
EN 1995, ME FOETISCH, PRESIDENT OF THE EXECUTIVE BOARD OF ICSA COMPANY, LAWYER, MEMBER OF A BROTHERHOOD, ANNOUNCED THAT HIS TITLE OF LAWYER, WITH THE RELATIONS BINDING HIM WITH HIS BROTHERHOOD TO THE COURTS, ALLOWED HIM TO COMMIT CRIMES WITH COMPLETE IMPUNITY.
IN 2005, ME de ROUGEMONT CONFIRMED THE EXISTENCE OF THESE HIDDEN RELATIONS WHICH THE PUBLIC CANNOT KNOW.

THE DEMONSTRATION OF ME FOETISCH WHICH PROVOKED THE MURDER OF PIERRE PENEL
In 1995, Me Foetisch, PRESIDENT of the executive board of ICSA Company commits 3 breaches, unfair management, swindle, and violation of the copyright to allow his friend Penel, manager of ICSA, to compete disloyally with Mr Erni.
At the time, when the codes of procedures must be applied to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution, the professionals of the law teach to Mr Erni that is needed an authorization of the President of the Bar to lodge a complaint against the President of the executive board of ICSA, because he is lawyer. This authorization will be refused.
In 2002, Me Foetisch, who must testify on oath, will compromise with his testimony all the judicial system by saying that the contract, which he disputed in 1995 to swindle Mr Erni, was valid. A little time after Mr Penel dies suddenly. According to a dissident lawyer, Mr Penel, become too annoying, was murdered by poisoning.
In 2006,5 minutes are necessary to Me de ROUGEMONT, to read the contract and notice breaches.
Me de ROUGEMONT declares that Me Foetisch should have been charged in 1995, ....
.... But he also confirms the existence of these hidden relations binding the Bar association to the Courts which do that the code of procedure is not applicable. He explains how the Bar association use them to allow their members to commit crimes with complete impunity. Facts confirmed in 2016 by Me Christian BETTEX.

PUBLIC QUESTIONS TO THE Dr ADRIAN URWYLER, ONE OF THE AUTHORS OF THE CODES OF PROCEDURES
Sir, Dr Adrian Urwyler, you have just shown how the code of procedure, of which you are one of authors, allows to by-pass the respect of the fundamental rights in this given context : 180204DE_AU

If we resume the demonstration made by the National Councillor, Me Philippe BAUER, namely that the codes of procedures do not yet have any measure for the control of the constitutional fundamental rights respect, because, in contrary, they are de facto drafted to allow the members of the brotherhoods to commit crimes with complete impunity:

1) Does it correspond to your Values?

2) Why did not you plan that the code of procedure forces the judges to verify that their decision respects the fundamental rights, because it is the first purpose of the codes of procedures?

3) How you can support that your code of procedure allowed Me Philippe BAUER to obtain that the federal Court breaks the judgment of Neuchâtel with the motivation that:
When a Court cannot make testify the unique witness of a false denunciation because it is forbidden to testify by the President of the Bar, it is the role of the  witness forbidden to testify by the brotherhood, to take the risk of undergoing an economic damage which is not bearable according to Me de ROUGEMONT, by violating the ban to testify made by the President of the BAR, to assure the respect for the fundamental rights of the accused citizen falsely accused?

4) How this economic risk for the witness forbidden to testify can be ignored by your code of procedure, when a false denunciation is made by members of the brotherhood for allowing a President of the Court, as Bertrand SAUTEREL, to assert that the violation of the copyright caused only a damage of 4000 CHF, while he knows that the judicial expertise calculated it for more than 2 million? How your code of procedure can allow such an act of abuse of authority which was inconceivable for Me de Rougemont?

5) How can your code of procedure assure the respect of the fundamental rights if a judge can remove the contents of the mail of January 18th, 1996, see comments at date 24.01.18 below?

6) What would you answer instead of Me Schaller to the questions asked in the document below?
180119DE_RS

7) How is it possible that your code of procedure allows to Me Christian BETTEX to be in the same case : President of the Bar, the lawyer of the State, the lawyer of the Parliament and to act as he made it?
How does your code of procedure allow to respect the fundamental rights by allowing that Judge Habermacher retrieve from the file, the document which describes this intervention of the former President of the Bar, Me Christian BETTEX, at all levels?, see part 170405DE_TA

8) How it is possible that your code of procedure allows two judges Mr CHAPUIS and Mr BRIAND to judge an case, where nobody knows them. We do not even know if they exist. They are maybe only virtual! See parts :
180119DE_BC
180119DE_CB

By knowing that only 5 minutes were necessary for Me de ROUGEMONT to read the contract and to declare that Me Foetisch should have been charged in 1995, by knowing that Me de Rougemont couldn't explain the behavior of Judge Treccani and Judge Sauterel, see comments below on January 31st, 2018, how do you explain that your code of procedure allows one such violation of the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution during 23 years of procedure?

How come that your code of procedure allows that a Court sends a file with ban to photocopy it, see below, comments at the date of 31.01.2018 ?

How come that your code of procedure can prevent Presiding judge from making  testify the unique witness of a false accusation made by members of the Bar association? Etc. …,it lasts for 23 years !

EACH OF US HAS TO APPRECIATE THAT YOUR CODE OF PROCEDURE HAS A SINGLE DEFECT, HE DOES NOT ALLOW TO ENFORCE THE FUNDAMENTAL GUARANTEED RIGHTS BY THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION, WHILE IT MUST BE ITS MAIN FUNCTION !

180204DE_AU

jugement_NE

180119DE_RS

180119DE_BC

180119DE_CB

170405DE_TA

He could explain that there is not only the contents kept in the dark of the Letter dated  January 18th, 1996, which shows the functioning of the hidden relations, highlighted further to what the judge de Montmollin had not planned that Mr Erni would write him a Letter by short-circuiting his lawyer. (See below comments at the date of January 24 th, 2018)

He could explain for example, how the contents kept in the dark of the secret questioning of July 15th, 1999 of Adel Michael shows the functioning of the hidden relations, highlighted further to what himself, as investigating judge, had not planned that Mr Erni comes to consult the file in the Court without his lawyer announced the surprised visit of Mr Erni.

We remind that Me de Rougemont explained that the code of procedures does not allow to take into account these hidden relations which allow the members of brotherhoods to commit crimes with complete impunity.
See part 171210DE_GB

With this project of a Chair in Law of the hidden relations, we expose here, for Judge Grégoire BOVET, this case of the secret questioning of July 15th, 1999, of Adel Michael. How, Judge Bovet could be appointed Professor for this new Chair in law of the hidden relations binding lawyers, members of brotherhoods, to the Courts, he will can certainly give an instructive lesson in law justifying the way taken by judge Jean Treccani, former substitute federal Judge, to enforce the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution by applying a code of procedure vitiated with the hidden relations !
180119DE_GB

If the criminal justice did not have its power reduced by the hidden relations which bind the national Councillor Philippe BAUER and his colleagues to the Federal Court, it is the choice of each citizen to assess that Prosecutor Fabien GASSER would not have violated the obligation to denounce!
(See below comments at the date January 17th 2018)

The Judge Virginie SONNEY could have the vocation to defend the members of the criminal organization which enriches Me Foetisch by violating in a way grime the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution. (See part 180119DE_VS)

THE SECRET QUESTIONING, OF JULY 15TH, 1999, OF ADEL MICHAEL BY THE JUDGE TRECCANI, SHOULD FASCINATE THE FUTURE PROFESSOR OF THE CHAIR IN LAW OF THE HIDDEN RELATIONS. IN ANY CASE IT DID NOT LEAVE INDIFFERENT THE DISSIDENT LAWYER, FOR DETAILS SEE BELOW:
Chronological facts (1995....)
1) The President of ICSA, Me Foetisch, with his accomplices 4M (Adel Michael) violate the copyright.
2) The Bar association forbids that a criminal complaint can be lodge against Me Foetisch, it could be lodged only against 4M.
See part 950822PR_OB
3) In August 15th, 1995, Mr Erni makes to judge Treccani, with a portable reader, a demonstration of the digital application stolen and copied illicitly by Me Foetisch. The Judge has the formal proof that the application specifications has been ordered with the contract of October 19th, 1994. The Judge knows that the copyright was violated by Me Foetisch who declared that contract of October 19th, 1994, binding its company to Mr Erni, has never been valid.
4) Mr Erni's lawyer cannot obtain, that the judge Treccani questionned 4M (Adel Michael), accused of violation of the copyright, so he cannot obtain that the accused produces the contract which he used to violate the copyright. Nevertheless, the judge Treccani, who does not want to question Adel Michael, knows that the contract is a false one further to the demonstration of the digital application which made to him Mr Erni.
5) In 2000, the Judge Treccani pronounced the dismissal of the charges for Me Foetisch and 4M, without having never questionned the accused of 4M according to Mr Erni's Lawyers. The dismissal of the charges was granted with benefit of the doubt further to that nobody could see the contract handed by Me Foetisch to 4M for violating the copyright. This procedure, used by the judge to dismiss the charges, has scandalized the public who attended the conference on this business case of the MBA-HEC in 2010. Nobody could understand that 4M (Adel Michael) did not have to show the contract received from Me Foetisch which, according to them, allowed them to reproduce the digital application.
See part 101208HEC

Chronological facts after the dismissal of the charges (2000)
1) Mr Erni pays a visit not announced to the Court, he discovers in the  trial file that Judge Treccani has questionned  in secret 4M (Adel Michael), on July 15th, 1999. He notes that Judge Treccani knew the contract which Me Foetisch handed to 4M, and he had the formal proof that Me Foetisch and 4M had violated the copyright.
2) Mr Erni interrupts the prescription further to this inconceivable discovery. His family will then be the object of pressure.
3) Mr Erni appoints another lawyer to obtain a certified true copy of the file. In the file sent by the Court, the Minutes of the secret questioning of 4M does not exist. Mr Erni will then be the object of outrageous professional blackmail.
4) Mr Erni appoints a new lawyer, Me Paratte. The latter discovers that there is a track in one of the operation Minutes of the file, which indicates that on July 15th 1999, 4M have been questioned. So the proof was brought that Judge Treccani questionned in secret the accused 4M!
5) Me Paratte requires again from the Court to get the original file.
6) The Court send the original file to the office of the Court of Neuchâtel with ban to allow Me Paratte doing copy of the file.
7) Me Paratte discovers that Mr Erni was right: the Minutes of the questioning dated July 15th 1999 existed in this original file and proved the violation of the copyright. But he was only the eyewitness of the existence of these Minutes, because he were forbidden by the Court to photocopy them. d506

To underline that in civil procedure, in 2002, Me Foetisch heard as witness, on oath, has confirmed that the contract of October 19th, 1994, was valid and was the contract which was linking his company to Mr Erni, while he had violated this contract in 1995 to compete unfairly against Mr Erni with an Italian company and to torpedo the company of Mr Erni with the hidden relations which bound him to the Courts.

Question to Mr Grégoire BOVET : After your two lessons in law, Sir, the future Professor of the Chair of the hidden relations: 180119DE_GB
1) Do you consider that Jean TRECCANI respected the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution in his decisions?
2) Do you agree with Me de Rougemont who says that the code of procedures is not applicable because the Courts have their power reduced by the hidden relations which bind them to the brotherhoods of lawyers?
3) Did Me Philippe BAUER respect the fundamental rights by calling upon the hidden relations who binds him to the federal Court to hand down the Neuchâtel judgment which restored the equality in front of the law? See comments below under date of December 20th, 2017, and of January 2nd, 2018?

171210DE_GB

180119DE_GB

180119DE_VS

950822PR_OB

101208HEC

Mr Penel would have been murdered with the hidden relations which bind Me Philippe BAUER and his colleagues to the Courts !

Two vaudois Judges, Bernard CHAPUIS and Cédric BRIAND, were instructed to explain to the Parliament vaudois the procedures which they used "to respect" the article 35 of the federal Constitution with a state of the facts that they knew to be incomplete and misleading.
180119DE_BC
180119DE_CB

(Let us hope that they will have the honesty of Yannick BUTTET which resigned when he realized that he had had a disrespectful behaviour of the Values of the Constitution. Their answer will be published on this site.)

If the criminal justice had not its power reduced by the hidden relations which bind the National Councillor Philippe BAUER and his colleagues to the Federal Court, Pierre PENEL would not have been murdered and Prosecutor Fabien GASSER would not have violated the obligation to denounce !

This letter of January 18th, 1996 has again been kept in the dark, apart from the file, in 2017 by Judge Christine HABERMACHER, to be able to deliver an inequitable judgment.
180119DE_RS

The dissident lawyer, who is the lawyer of the GER, (see below the date of 21.10.2016) asserted that Mr. Penel died poisoned. He is one of the 3 lawyers, who had knowledge of the contents of this letter of January 18th, 1996, which they consider to be as a time bomb.
He explained to Mr Erni that this letter of January 18th, 1996, that he discovered in April, 2016, had an impact which Mr Erni could not imagine when he wrote it. For the curious, see his explanations in the first and second paragraph of the page 14 and see the question G on the page 16 of the following document:
180119DE_RS

According to the dissident lawyer Mr Penel would have been murdered: because in 1996, Mr Erni lost the provisional measures further to what a lawyer, colleague of Me Foetisch, ordered to Judge de Montmollin to persuade in his judgment that Mr Erni was not competitive, while he did not have to prove it.
The lawyer made introduce by the judge a false price into his judgment, while the judge knew the real price which appeared in the contract and while he knew that this contractual price had been confirmed by the testimony of the signatory of the contract. The false price which the judge had to introduce in his judgment, to persuade that Mr Erni was not competitive, was more than the double of the contractual price. The judge introduced this false price in the judgment by asserting that it had been given by a witness, while he knew that this witness has never existed.
The judge did not plan that Mr Erni was going to point out it to him by a letter dated January 18th, 1996....
When the damage was estimated at more than two millions CHF, Mr Penel, who knew this agreement made between the colleague of Me Foetisch and the judge de Montmollin, would then have become a risk for the Bar association. He would then have died poisoned, and the lawyer of the GER would know his murderer.
The Bar association then made a false denunciation, which cannot be denied,  to persuade that Mr Erni had undergone only a damage of 4000 CHF by preventing the Judge from making testify  the unique witness of this false accusation.
The neuchâteloise justice having blamed the Bar association to have prevented the judge from making testify the witness, Me Philippe BAUER then called upon the privileges of the members of the Bar association which bind them to the Courts to hand down this judgment by the federal Court ... The privileges of the Bar association were considered more important than the respect for the guaranteed fundamental rights by the Constitutionn.

180119DE_RS

180119DE_BC

180119DE_CB

0990607TC_DE

Very respectful of the hidden relations which bind him to the members of the Brotherhoods of lawyers, he forgets his general prosecutor's duty !

Criminal complaint has been lodged :

180103DE_AF

Note : The national Councillor Philippe BAUER showed that there was actually no neutral and independent Court to handle such a complaint, but the Swiss Constitution guarantees it !

Question to our fellow citizens :
What a General Prosecutor has to do, if he knows the following request for a parliamentary inquiry : 051217DP_GC
... and that he knows that Me Christian BETTEX, state Lawyer, confirmed, in this given context, that the power of the judges is reduced as indicates it the request for a parliamentary inquiry ?

Who knew that in the judgment described in the request for a parliamentary inquiry, the President of the Court (Bertrand Sauterel) declared that Mr. Erni had undergone only a damage of 4000 CHF for the violation of the copyright while he had a judicial expertise, in his file, which estimated the damage at more than 2 million CHF?

Who knew that Judge Sauterel was forbidden by Me Foetisch Brotherhoods to make Me Burnet testify, because the latter made do the judicial expertise and that he could give evidence that judge Sauterel knew that the damage had been estimated at more than 2 millions and that Mr Erni was the object of a false complaint ?

Who knew that the national Councillor Philippe Bauer forced the federal Court to kneel before the Bar association to hand down the cantonal judgment which had ended this privilege. Privilèges

....according to the example of the national Councillor Philippe BAUER, Prosecutor Raphaël Bourquin violated the article 35 of the federal Constitution to protect the hidden privileges of the lawyers association. Prosecutor Fabien GASSER, in turn, violates the application of the article 302 CPP (obligation to denounce), while he has the duty to apply it. We remind that the Prosecutor has the obligation to respect the fundamental rights in his decisions (art 35 federal Constitution).

180103DE_AF

180103DE_MP

180103DE_DB

180103DE_AB

180103DE_BB

THE ZERO TOLERANCE BECOMES THE STANDARD AT PARLIAMENT
Dominique de BUMAN,
President of the Parliament

Contrary to his predecessors, he does not want to ignore the deficiencies of the justice and the violation of the fundamental rights

He begins his year of Presidency by giving the example. Contrary to his predecessors, not only he answers the mails, but consequent with his VALUES and his function, he does not want to close his eyes on personalities who make an excessive use of their balance of power.

As soon as Mr. Erni got in conctact with him, Mr. de BUMAN invited Mr. Erni to carry this case of deficiencies of the justice in front of both Chambers of management of the PARLIAMENT which have the competence to enforce the federal Constitution.

Thanks to the President of the federal Assembly wanting to apply Zero tolerance for those who make an excessive use of their position of strength.
As a reminder, see part 171208DE_DB

Are the chambers of management of the Parliament going to create an ad hoc, not statutory Court, to end the economic criminality committed by professionals of the law with their privileges, as suggests it, judge Grégoire BOVET?
See Part 171231DE_GB

After Yannick BUTTET, it's time that the OMERTA is broken on the Harassment made by people like Me Philippe BAUER, who makes an excessive use of the balance of power which they have with their Title of lawyer, former President of a brotherhood, and their Parliament function.

171208DE_DB

171231DE_GB

This national Councillor, puppeteer of Judges, with his Droit de Seigneur of former President of the Bar, made lay an egg of more than 40 000 CHF from one of his golden geese to thank his colleague Me Patrick Foetisch.
We remind that Me Patrick Foetisch showed that the judges have their power reduced by their privileges and that they are only their minions.

We wonder how Harvey Weinstein, who has violated the dignity of hundred women, was able to make an excessive use of his power during so many years with complete impunity?

Even more, each has to wonder how a National Councillor, as Philippe Bauer, who has no respect for the human dignity, was able to be elected to the Parliament having helped his colleague Foetisch to escape from justice by calling upon the privileges of his profession.

Who knew, when he elected Philippe BAUER, that the latter laughs completely with the guaranteed fundamental rights by the federal Constitution and that he makes an excessive use of his power and of the privileges of his profession to favour the members of his brotherhood by the Courts by allowing them to violate the rights of the other citizens?

All the members of Parliament, who made a commitment not to tolerate any more a behaviour by one of theirs that publicly harms the human dignity, are invited to apply it for 2018 !

REMINDER OF THE HISTORY OF THIS GOLD EGG LAID FOR Me PHILIPPE BAUER IN THANKS OF HIS SERVICES PROVIDED TO THE MEMBERS OF THE BROTHERHOODS.

Audience of September 4th. 2002 ,
Me Burnet obtains the testimony of Me Foetisch made under oath. The latter gave evidence that the contract which bound him to Mr Erni is the one that judge showed him. This contract was dated October 19th, 1994. According to this contract Mr Erni holds the copyright. A judicial expertise estimates the damage due to the violation of the copyright to more than 2 millions of CHF according to this contract authenticated by Me Foetisch.

Audience of October 26th 2005,
Mr Erni is falsely accused by Me Foetisch Brotherhood and by his associates 4M / Jean-Claude Roch with a contract which they did not put in the criminal complaint so that the falsehood of that allegation cannot be verified. They assert that Mr Erni did not hold the copyright by attributing false phone words to Me Burnet. Me Burnet is the only witness who can deny this false allegation. Me BETTEX, President of the Bar of Me Foetisch brotherhood forbade that Me Burnet can testify in Court.
The President of the Court says that he cannot make him testify since Me Bettex, Bar President of the brotherhood, forbade him to testify.
J.S., a witness of the audience of September 4th, 2002, will testify on what was established on September 4th, 2002 with Me Burnet. The judge had by this way the evidence of the false allegation, 020909PF_JS.
President of the Court, Judge Sauterel, will cunningly not mention this evidence in his judgment. He will assert in his judgment that Mr Erni did not undergo a damage greater than 4000 CHF, while he knows that the judicial expertise established it of more than 2 millions CHF based on the evidence of the testimony of Me Foetisch.
Me Foetisch brotherhood refuses to make a commitment to allow the unique witness of the false allegation to testify in the future, what makes impossible to deny the cunningly deceit of the Judge Sauterel.
A request of parliamentary inquiry is put down on these hidden relations which bind lawyers, members of brotherhoods, to the Courts 051217DP_GC
Me de Rougemont, lawyer mandated by the Parliament, confirms the existence of these hidden relations which bind lawyers, members of brotherhoods, to the Courts. He stressed that the code of procedure cannot take into account this hidden relations. Consequently, it is not applicable.

Judgement of Neuchâtel February 3rd, 2009
The Court of Neuchâtel, made aware of the violation of the fundamental rights by the brotherhood of Me Foetisch - who makes an excessive use of his hidden privileges - and made aware of the evidence established by Me Burnet on September 3rd, 2002, agrees with Mr Erni. The Court confirms that the brotherhood of Me Foetisch did not have the right to forbid Me Burnet to testify under these circumstances 090203_jugement_NE
Intervention of our Swiss Weinstein at the Federal Court
Philippe BAUER, big President of the Bar, laughing completely with the respect for the fundamental rights, requires and obtains cunningly from the Federal Court that it breaks this judgment of Neuchâtel based on the respect of the fundamental rights.
Philippe BAUER is then going to require the gratitude for the power of his brotherhood which can commit crimes with complete impunity
Further to this Philippe BAUER's intervention, one of its geese that lays the golden eggs, Sonia BULLIARD GROSSET, has just given 40 000 CHF to Me Foetisch for having shown that Me Philippe BAUER, National Councillor, defends unworthy Values for a PARLIAMENTARY. It should be stressed that the Values of Philippe BAUER are worse than those of Yannick BUTTET. Nobody was aware of this hidden face of Me Philippe BAUER during his election campaign to the Parliament and the way he is using his Droit du Seigneur with a code of procedure which cannot take into account his hidden privileges which bind him to the Federal Court.